{ "stats": { "total_pdfs": 312, "processed": 246, "failed": 0, "skipped": 66, "start_time": "2026-02-22T02:38:00.305621", "extraction_stats": { "sender_found": 114, "date_found": 3, "subject_found": 114, "recipient_found": 165 }, "end_time": "2026-02-22T02:40:26.821031", "duration_seconds": 146.51541 }, "documents": [ { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n09/04/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nANNUAL REPORT DUE DATE NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI Number: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed business en\u0000ty\u2019s annual report is due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n09/04/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nANNUAL REPORT DUE DATE NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI Number: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed business en\u0000ty\u2019s annual report is due on 10/31/2024. To remain in ac\u0000ve status, please submit an\nannual report by the due date above. Please verify that the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email\naddress, and update as needed.\nFailure to file the necessary report will result in delinquent status and may result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or\ntermina\u0000on of your registra\u0000on.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nEffec\u0000ve January 1, 2024:\nFile a Beneficial Ownership Informa\u0000on Report with the U.S. Treasury\u2019s Financial Crimes Enforcement\nNetwork (FinCEN). Business en\u0000\u0000es formed or registered prior to January 1, 2024, must file an ini\u0000al\nbeneficial ownership report before January 1, 2025. Updates or correc\u0000ons to a previously filed beneficial\nownership reports must be submi\u0000ed within 30 days of becoming aware of the change.\nFor a current link to file the beneficial ownership informa\u0000on report and addi\u0000onal informa\u0000on, see our\nwebsite at h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons under the Business En\u0000ty tab.\nTo ask about available alterna\u0000ve methods for submi\u0000ng a filing or form for the visually impaired, please call 360-\n725-0377. Teletype (TTY) users may use the Washington Relay Service by calling 711.\nFor a rapid response to ques\u0000ons, requests for assistance, or to provide feedback, please visit the Corpora\u0000ons and\nChari\u0000es website at h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons to chat with a representa\u0000ve.\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/BandTTowSSNoticeofDissolutioin.pdf", "filename": "BandTTowSSNoticeofDissolutioin.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.927660", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: \nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS. Ryan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: \nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to make\nit off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was not\ncarrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911 service).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to accompany\nthe male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator, and I\nneeded to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle has\nbeen done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as auto\ntheft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let us\ngo, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an unknown\nfemales voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The man yelled \u201cyou\nhave to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where he is?!\u201d And the\nman yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here trying\nto do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take capture that\nevidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming behaviors and\nconduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They performed a\nbizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front (dash cam I\npresume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm voice that I am non-\ncombative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and made repeated threats\nto shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a mere 20 feet away, broad\ndaylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one more\nword. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I am\ncomplying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said the\nnext time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as I\ncompiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard trying\nto dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and I\nslammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they claimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log) \u201che\ndoesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to let\nme know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to why\nthat delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in. I\npolitely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he wanted\nto part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to come\nview video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was floored by the\negregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on video. The video\nsupports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other than to put my hands\nip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing their\nclaim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "email_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.979648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM\nGmail - Urgent: Brady Motion and Hearing Prep https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that\nany unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies\nof the original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_BradyMotionClarificationForSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_BradyMotionClarificationForSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.712657", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a\nconflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit\nmurder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask\nyou to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect\neveryone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of\nJuly for them. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was\nintroduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the\nStenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get\nher formal name. MOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL\nPROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of\nbecome a political target OF; SALLY BAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What\nis more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by\nthe alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t\nmean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and\nthe incidents here are only indicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July\n4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service\naside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in\ntheir pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000.\nI reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my\ntruck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill.\nRyan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed\nand texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at\nleast 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with\nsome preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a\nproper working email. I have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail\nand clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades. I have been proactive in\nobtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing\ncourt clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had\nconcerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did\nnot reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time\nearlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on\n911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside assistance for the\nflat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and\nrun my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products throughout the state, for 7 years\nwhile attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I\nrespect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after\ntactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do\nme and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I\nwill present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court.\nAgain I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs\nby judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth\nworks and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nnamely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations\nhad been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount of\nthis eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful\ninventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he was in fact every\nbit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and\nhe moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle. Accusations came out and Murray denied\nthem. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us\nwho had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong\nwill the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that\nplaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot\nof us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only\nsaid Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the\ncase is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I\nsimply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray\nlies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this apply to our case? In the incident,\nas I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were\ngonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed onsite. I then heard a woman\nfrantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go\nnow just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing she was yet another piece\nof evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a\ncareer politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a\nsenior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she\nhad aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers\npresented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to\nkeep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach,\nprobably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed\nMurray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a\ndisgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy\ncreating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express\nstimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even\nmafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express\nour intended message. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between\nsome things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my\nname tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by\nprofessional contractors. That FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat\nunfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work\nwalking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She\nwas robbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They\nnever caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019.\nI\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a\ndesert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and photos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we\nenjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had\nmy own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting\nvisitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all.\nAbsolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my\nlicense plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it.\nThen Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to\ntry to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and\nshe is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since\n2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a\nformer SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate\nfor me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the\nway the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\n2 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\nHi Ryan,\nWe actually have court today. I am glad your phone is working. Are you able to come to court today?\nThe judge would like you here in person if possible. If not, I can try to get it moved until Wednesday or next Monday\nbut let me know what would work for you.\nThanks,\nOn Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:26 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\n3 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nI have a working phone again. I will try to call you tomorrow around 9am.\nRyan\n(267)777-2344\n4 attachments\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg\n53K\n527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-D3D164A07FFC.jpeg\n54K\nIMG_6448.jpeg\n1435K\nIMG_6452.jpeg\n3778K\n4 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Titus-Warrant-Quash-and-Bagshaw-Ideintified-Feb-14-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_Titus-Warrant-Quash-and-Bagshaw-Ideintified-Feb-14-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 5.72, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.312652", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nStatus on conflict of interest with court personnel\nRyan Hell Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 4:12 AM\nTo: \nBrian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nStatus on conflict of interest with court personnel\nRyan Hell Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 4:12 AM\nTo: \nBrian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of company\nand home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled B&T of\ncashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving behind my\npickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man eventually\nsurrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and he\nadmitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on and\naired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As it\nwas, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down the\nrabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal residence\u201d. I\ncan\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the mountain\nof discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is the\nfact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non rivercom\nnon CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and commit murder.\nNone of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t seeing what\u2019s\nclearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any moral\nreason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s really\ndumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner campaign\ncontributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he ADOPTED\nthen molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected, there\u2019s been much\nconvo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the office of Seattle mayor?\nCome on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being silenced like this then let\u2019s note\nthat.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly criminal\nactions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure that\naccountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better things\nto do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and constitutional\nrights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence was tampered.\nAnd most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was conspired by\nJeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom operations and\ntechnology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and Wenatchee fire.\nWa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich programmatically\nshould have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t get\nit. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified of\nme roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice to\nshare it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not only\nmake a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "email_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.692657", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\n3 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\n4 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me\nfor unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or endorse\nthem. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false, especially\ncitations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their property.\nI am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat to get a\ngun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated the\nthreat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this seems\nlike a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since the\nalleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make that\nthey get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "filename": "email_SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.15, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.815646", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/24C06401.pdf", "filename": "24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.590668", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged\nand confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any\nunauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies of\nthe original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_SeansBradyResponseAndOopsIforgotSomeVideos-June-16-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_SeansBradyResponseAndOopsIforgotSomeVideos-June-16-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.442642", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "; crowe@seattletimes.com; cwinfrey@seattletimes.com; DHS FOIA Public", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Urgent Legal Case - Evidence of Government Misconduct CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you", "summary": "CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you\nrecognize and/or trust the sender.", "body": "CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you\nrecognize and/or trust the sender. Contact your component SOC with questions or concerns.\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon. I desperately need legal representation or media attention.\nRyan Hell(267) 777-2344", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct.pdf", "filename": "email_RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct.pdf", "size_mb": 0.07, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.875647", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A.", "body": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A. 46. 020. 2bii Felony Harassment Threats to Kill.\nDuring my intersctiona with Ryan I took notice of how at ti-11 he appeared to be\nparanoid and had rapid speech. He seemed to believe things such H how people\nwere after him and wanted to kill hi111.\nSgt, Musgrove obtained a signed written statement from\n( 1. Although I will transcribe these stateNnt in\nJlt'J\nnarrative to the\nbest of my ability, please review their written statement as a part of your\nreview of this case.\n\"Mid day on 7-4-24 I learned of a stranded motorist on Colockum Paas Rd, which\nis not tar fro\u25a0 my residence. I went to help the stranded 1110tori11ts as one of\nthem was diabetic and waa not feeling well. Upon arrival, the male and female\nboth looked very hot, and the fensle was not feeling well. I told both of them\nwho I waa and that I waa a volunteer firefighter and was offering to take them\nback to my place, out of the heat, to wait for the tow coq,any that had been\ncalled. Both the 11111le and felllllle were very appreciative for the help. We loaded\neveryone into Jlf'J personal vehicle and returned to my house, including their 2\ndoga. Ille sat in my shop and waited for the tow company. At one point prior to\nreturning to my place, the male tried to give me 1110ney, which I refused, stating\nthe reason I was helping was to get them out of the heat, and the fe11111lea\ndiabetic issues, which were resolved with orange juice and some candy.\nApproxi11111tely 1,5 hours after arriving at fir/ place, the tow coiapany returned\nwith their truck, having replaced a flat tire and driving it out for them. I waa\nin the shop and walked outside where the male half was talking with the tow\nco111p11ny. He then said that we were trying to acam hi\u2022 as he walked up and got in\nmy face, accusing me of tricking him into a aca111. He became 1110re irate, and then\nstated that he was going to leave and get guns, conie back and shoot the place\nup. Thia is when I called Rivercoa and asked Lg to step it up, as they were\nalready enroute. The male continued to yell and accuse of iq,eraonating a\n11111\ncity equoyee and yelling obenities. He began calling my wife na11111a. I told him\nhe needed to calm down, and he reacted by peeling his veat off and pulled a\nfolding knife off hia hip, opened it, and stood in a stance ready to fight. I\ncalled Rivercom again and stayed on the line until LE was out with the male.\u2022\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written statements from\nAlthough I will transcribe these atate111ent in my narrative to the beat of Jlt'J\nability, please review their written atate-nt aa a part of your review of this\ncase.\n\"I Drove with my Husband Jeremiah to help out ao- people that were in Need of\nHelp aa we got there a lady and a man was there I then gave the wo11111n aon, water\ndue to She was the one that needed help 1110re. Apond Notice there truck had a\nflat tire and riding on ri111e, the man said that he would pay ua for the ride\ndown till a tow truck came and got the truck we told him that was not needed\njust pay our part forward then we told him that he need to take up pay for tow\nwith thein, everything was fine till tow pick up truck and they told him he\nneeded to money for the tow, they talked for a few then the man got into my\nhuabanda face an~ told hia that 1101118 one was going to get hurt and shot if thP.y\ntake hill true-;;, aft~r that. I ., lat\"terl to recored and then he pulled a knife and\ngot that on v.ledo aa well, lie began taking crap to 111e ao I got a little mouthey.\nhe was all over the board. With threatening\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written state-nt from ),\nAlthough I will transcribe these statement in my narrative to the beat of my\nability, please review their written statement aa a part of your review of this\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "filename": "Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "size_mb": 0.33, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.885671", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy Sean,", "summary": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion!", "body": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion! Brilliant idea, counsel\u2019!\nHere is some further clarification regarding the relevance of Protocol 33, as cited in my prior correspondence, and to\naddress your request for the source of this protocol. This information directly supports my motion to preserve\nevidence, as it establishes that RiverCom 911\u2019s handling of my 911 call violated mandatory emergency medical\ndispatch protocols, potentially constituting evidence tampering or negligence relevant to my case. Below, I outline the\nregulatory framework, RiverCom\u2019s adherence to these protocols, and their implications.\n1. Overview of Protocol 33 in Emergency Medical Dispatch Protocol 33 is a component of the Medical Priority\nDispatch System (MPDS), a standardized protocol used by 911 dispatch centers to triage and respond to medical\nemergency calls. Specifically, Protocol 33 addresses urgent medical emergencies, including inter-facility transfers and\nconditions such as suspected strokes or severe diabetic crises. It requires dispatchers to:\n\u2022 Classify the call based on reported symptoms.\n\u2022 Dispatch appropriate emergency medical services (EMS), such as paramedics.\n\u2022 Maintain the call\u2019s priority level unless a qualified medical professional (e.g., paramedic or physician) provides\ndocumented clearance.\nIn my case, the 911 call reported a potential stroke and a passenger with Type 1 diabetes who had not received\ninsulin, food, or water for two days\u2014both qualifying as medical emergencies under Protocol 33. The dispatcher\u2019s\nreduction of this call to a \u201croadside call\u201d without triage, medical assessment, or clearance violates these standards.\n2. RiverCom 911\u2019s Adherence to MPDS and Protocol 33 RiverCom 911, which serves Chelan and Douglas Counties,\nexplicitly utilizes the MPDS, including Protocol 33, as part of its dispatch operations. This is documented on\nRiverCom\u2019s official resources and training materials, accessible via their website (www.rivercom911.org). Specifically:\n\u2022 RiverCom\u2019s \u201cAbout Us\u201d and \u201cServices\u201d sections confirm that their dispatchers are trained and certified in MPDS\nprotocols to ensure compliance with national and state standards for emergency response.\n\u2022 RiverCom 911 Training Manual (referenced in their training materials) mandates the use of MPDS for all medical\nemergency calls, aligning with industry best practices for 911 operations.\nThis establishes that RiverCom is bound by Protocol 33\u2019s requirements when handling medical emergency calls, such\nas mine.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\n3. Washington State\u2019s Regulatory Authority Washington State further mandates compliance with MPDS protocols,\nincluding Protocol 33, through its regulatory framework for emergency medical services:\n\u2022 WAC 246-976-001 and WAC 246-976-182: These regulations, under the Washington Administrative Code, govern\nemergency medical services and require 911 dispatch centers to adhere to standardized protocols, protocols like\nMPDS to ensure proper EMS response to medical emergencies. WAC 246-976-182 specifically mandates that\ndispatchers dispatchers align EMS response with the reported severity of the call\u2019s severity.\n\u2022 RCW 70.168: This statute establishes the state\u2019s emergency medical Services and trauma care system, system\nrequiring coordinated dispatch responses to medical emergencies, emergencies consistent with protocols like MPDS.\nThese laws obligate RiverCom to follow Protocol 33, ensuring that medical emergencies are not improperly\ndowngraded without proper medical justification.\n4. Relevance to My Motion and Brady Implications The dispatcher\u2019s failure to follow Protocol 33 in my case\u2014\ndowngrading a medical emergency without triage or clearance\u2014raises concerns about evidence integrity, as the CAD\nfile reflects this improper action. This is directly relevant to my motion to preserve evidence, including CAD files,\ndispatch logs, radio communications, and metadata, to investigate potential tampering or negligence. Under Brady v.\nMaryland (373 U.S. 83 (1963)), the prosecution is obligated to disclose exculpatory evidence, including evidence of\nprocedural violations or tampering that could undermine the credibility of the state\u2019s case. The violation of Protocol 33\nconstitutes such evidence, as it suggests mishandling of my 911 call that could have impacted the incident\u2019s outcome.\n5. Request for Action Given the above, I respectfully request that you:\n\u2022 Incorporate this information into our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to my motion to preserve evidence.\n\u2022 Emphasize the Brady implications of RiverCom\u2019s protocol violation.\n\u2022 Pursue forensic analysis of the CAD file and related evidence to determine if tampering occurred, as the date\ndiscrepancy (May 27, 2025) remains unresolved despite your ambiguous / vague explanation citing \u201cin the range of\nwhen you requested it\u201d.\nPlease confirm receipt of this email and advise on next steps. If you require additional documentation or legal\ncitations, I am happy to assist in providing them.\nI\u2019m not a lawyer and I never attended law school or graduated a legal or social program. But I am capable of utilizing a\nnetwork of resources to provide help occasionally and I don\u2019t mind helping you with portions of the job which your\nAlma mater left out of corricul. Holefully someday this knowledge comes into play for one of your dui clients who you\ndefend.\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\nSincerely,\nRyan Hell\n267-777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:44 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n(1) Whether to pursue a plea deal or not is your call.\n(2) I'll file a short response today.\n(3) Where does this information about protocol 33 come from?\n(4) The 5/27/25 date corresponds to the time frame that I submitted the public records request to\nobtain the CAD log. This is consistent with other public records requests that I have made.\nThey have a portal here: https://rivercom911.org/public-records/\nPublic Records - RiverCom 911\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nHow RiverCom Responds to a Request for Public Records RiverCom will acknowledge a request for public\nrecords within five (5) business days of receiving the request, by one of the following: Provide the record\nAcknowledge the receipt of the request and provide a reasonable estimate of time to respond to and/or\ncomplete the request Request clarification of the record request\nrivercom911.org\n(5) I have also requested information on the license plate you have requested which you believe is\nSally Bagshaw.\n(6) I'll just give you the bottom line so you can decide if you want to ask for a new attorney on Monday\nor what.\nI think the odds this situation was orchestrated by some former disgraced Seattle employee and/or\nsome former city attorney is probably close to zero. I do not really engage or follow in conspiratorial\ncommunities or thinking and I am just looking at this for what it appears to be.\nIt seems more likely that you did get stuck in a remote area you believed would cut through back to the\nroads, but it did not, and you were stranded in hot weather with a passenger who was having a\nmedical emergency. You then called 911 for help.\nWhether you did or did not ask for it, they sent a tow truck and an off-duty dispatcher, Jeremiah\nJohnson, to find the truck. Jeremiah Johnson took you and the passenger back to his house. At some\npoint, the tow truck people started asking you to pay them for the tow.\nThere was a dispute over whether you should pay them at all and also that you had previously\ndisclosed to them that you were homeless and did not have any money. Thus, they should not have\nexpected payment.\nIt is around this time that they are alleging that during this dispute, you made a statement which\nconveyed something to the effect of \"you will take a bullet before you take my truck\" although the\nstatements from them seem to have varying versions of this alleged threat.\nIt was at this point, the guy's wife started filming on her phone and that he called the police.\nThe argument continued (without any further threat allegations from you), the wife makes some\nstatements and her own threat towards you. The husband approaches you around this same time\nframe and gets pretty close to the point where you pull out what appears to be a knife and then put it\naway. Both he and you called the cops.\nThen the cops arrived, essentially just taking the other people at their word, and arrested you.\nI still do not believe at this point that you have identified any particular defense to the allegation except\nto \"change the narrative.\"\nIf this case proceeds to trial, a judge will determine what comes into evidence and what does not. A\njury will hear the evidence that the judge lets in. That jury will be provided with a packet of papers\ncalled jury instructions which will outline some legal principles. Several of these documents will pertain\nto what the crime of harassment is legally defined as. The only thing the jury is called on to do is do\ndecide if the State, through the prosecutor, has proven that you committed these crimes beyond a\nreasonable doubt.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nThe base WPIC is here (and cites to several other ones): https://govt.westlaw.com/wcrji/Document/\nI093c5d8ba75611dd8931e514b9d4bd12?viewType=FullText&originationContext=\nView Document - Washington Criminal Jury Instructions - Westlaw\nTitle of crime. For ease of reference, the committee has referred to this crime as \u201cfelony harassment.\u201d\nThe word \u201cfelony\u201d should not be included unless the jury is also being instructed on the gross\nmisdemeanor form of the crime, WPIC 36.07.\ngovt.westlaw.com\nThere is no possibility during this trial that anyone besides you gets convicted of anything. Anyone\ncharged would get their own separate trial if they were ever charged. The only potential outcomes are\nthat the jury finds you guilty, not guilty, or cannot make a decision and there is a hung jury or mis-trial,\nwhich leaves open the possibility of another trial.\nIf you are convicted, you will have the right to appeal.\nWhile certain things will be relevant towards the potential bias of law enforcement or the parties\ninvolved (that at least Johnson was a dispatcher), it will be the jury that decides who is credible, or not,\nfactoring that bias in.\nMost of the potential jury pool is going to be just ordinary people who live in Chelan County. While\nsome may enjoy conspiracies, it is unlikely that all, or even most, of them will. And my assumption\nwould be that most, if not all, will not. It is also likely the judge will limit the evidence presented at trial\nto things they deem relevant to the issue of guilt, based upon the rules of evidence, and is probably\nnot even going to allow any tin-foil hat sort of stuff, although that will be their call.\nUltimately, you will likely need to testify in this case (although you have the right not to), if you want to\npresent your side of the case to the jury. Most likely, they are going to want to know if you made the\nalleged statement or not. If you did, they will want to know if it was a serious threat. If you did not, they\nwill want to know why these people are making this up. I do not think they will buy some story about a\nconspiracy to set you up in the middle of nowhere in Malaga, Washington and shake you down for a\nthousand dollars.\nIf you did make the statement, there are still some potential defenses as the threat, if made, was\napparently conditional, only in defense of your property, and in the context of a relatively long\nargument.\nJeremiah Johnson tells the cop in the video at about 37:45 that he wasn't worried about \"stepping it\nup\" until the knife portion, which was after well after the alleged threat.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Friday, June 20, 2025 6:03 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File\nDiscrepancy\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy\nSean,\nI am writing to ensure our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to the motion to preserve forensic metadata and\nlogs, scheduled for hearing next week, clearly addresses two critical issues:\n- a likely violation of International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD)\nprotocols by the RiverCom 911 dispatcher\n- a suspicious date discrepancy in the provided CAD file.\nThese issues are directly relevant to my defense against the felony harassment charges (RCW 9A.36.046) and\nconstitute exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, as they could demonstrate evidence tampering and\nmisrepresentation of my intent during the July 4, 2024, incident.\nThe CAD file for my initial 911 call confirms I reported a medical emergency for my type 1 diabetic passenger, who\nwas in possible insulin shock, underscoring my urgent request for help. However, the dispatcher marked the call as\n\u201cnot medical\u201d at the end, falsely claiming I retracted the emergency by stating my passenger was fine\u2014a claim I\nadamantly deny.\nUnder IAED EMD guidelines, specifically Protocol 33 for diabetic emergencies, dispatchers must assign a\nhigh-priority code (e.g., Delta) and dispatch an ambulance unless there is clear, documented evidence of\nretraction or on-scene medical verification that no emergency exists.\nNo such evidence exists, as I consistently pleaded for an ambulance.\nThe dispatcher\u2019s reclassification without justification violates EMD protocols and suggests an attempt to\ndownplay the medical emergency, aligning with the prosecution\u2019s narrative that I threatened individuals\nover a (non-existent) tow bill dispute, as emphasized in the harassment CAD file (call number 240700787).\nThe dispatcher\u2019s conduct during the call was highly unprofessional and irregular.\nShe answered rudely, saying, \u201cWhat? What do you want?\u201d and initially garbled her identity, only clarifying it was\nRiverCom 911 after I pressed her.\nWhen I requested an ambulance, she refused, stating, \u201cIt\u2019s the 4th of July, honey, there are no ambulances,\u201d and\ninsisted a mechanic inspect my truck\u2019s flat tire as a condition for any help.\nI refused repairs or towing to avoid potential extortion but agreed to a visual inspection only to secure ambulatory\nassistance, stipulating no repair bills.\nHer prior knowledge of my truck\u2019s condition within seconds of my initial call; which I hadn\u2019t mentioned, and her\nrefusal to dispatch an ambulance without mechanic involvement are absent from the CAD file, indicating possible\nomission or editing.\nThese actions breach IAED EMD protocols, which prioritize medical response over unrelated conditions, and\nsupport my claim that the dispatcher\u2019s handling was targeted and prejudiced, possibly tied to broader evidence\nmanipulation in this case.\nThe CAD Master Call Table for the harassment call (240700787), visibly dated 05/27/25, raises further concerns.\nThis date, nearly a year after the incident on July 4, 2024, suggests the file may have been edited, exported, or\naltered before being provided in discovery.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nCAD systems log modifications with timestamps and user IDs, and a future date could indicate tampering to align\nwith the prosecution\u2019s narrative.\nMetadata analysis, as requested in our forensics motion, could confirm when and by whom this file was accessed or\nedited, directly challenging the integrity of the evidence used against me.\nThe dispatchers felony harassment CAD file also references a prior call (likely 24C06391) where my passenger and\nI were assisted but omits critical medical details, further suggesting selective reporting to frame me as aggressive\nrather than a person acting under duress to save a life.\nTo strengthen our defense, please include the following in the rebuttal:\n(1) Argue that the dispatcher\u2019s reclassification of my medical call as \u201cnot medical\u201d violates IAED EMD Protocol 33,\nlacking documented evidence of retraction, and request access to RiverCom\u2019s audit logs to verify the change\u2019s\nlegitimacy.\n(2) Highlight the 05/27/25 date discrepancy on the CAD file as evidence of potential tampering, necessitating\nmetadata analysis to confirm its modification history.\nThese points are exculpatory, as they could prove the prosecution\u2019s evidence was manipulated to misrepresent my\nactions, undermining the harassment charges.\nPlease confirm by email that this rebuttal has been filed by June 23, 2025.\nSincerely, Ryan :)", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.837646", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nbeing operated beyond a 75 air-mile ra- (iii) One or more motor vehicles in-\ndius (86.3 statute miles or 138.9 kilo- curring disabling damage as a result of\nmeters) from the driver\u2019s normal work- the accident, requiring the motor vehi-\nreporting location, and provided the cle(s) to be transported away from the\nvehicle does not otherwise meet the scene by a tow truck or other motor\ndefinition of a commercial motor vehi- vehicle. cle, except that motor carriers oper- (2) The term accident does not in-\nating such vehicles are required to clude:\ncomply with \u00a7\u00a7390.15, 390.19, and (i) An occurrence involving only\n390.21(a) and (b)(2).", "body": "Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nbeing operated beyond a 75 air-mile ra- (iii) One or more motor vehicles in-\ndius (86.3 statute miles or 138.9 kilo- curring disabling damage as a result of\nmeters) from the driver\u2019s normal work- the accident, requiring the motor vehi-\nreporting location, and provided the cle(s) to be transported away from the\nvehicle does not otherwise meet the scene by a tow truck or other motor\ndefinition of a commercial motor vehi- vehicle.\ncle, except that motor carriers oper- (2) The term accident does not in-\nating such vehicles are required to clude:\ncomply with \u00a7\u00a7390.15, 390.19, and (i) An occurrence involving only\n390.21(a) and (b)(2). boarding and alighting from a sta-\n(g) Motor carriers that transport haz- tionary motor vehicle; or\nardous materials in intrastate commerce. (ii) An occurrence involving only the\nThe rules in the following provisions of loading or unloading of cargo.\nsubchapter B of this chapter apply to\nAlcohol concentration (AC) means the\nmotor carriers that transport haz-\nconcentration of alcohol in a person\u2019s\nardous materials in intrastate com-\nblood or breath. When expressed as a\nmerce and to the motor vehicles that\npercentage it means grams of alcohol\ntransport hazardous materials in intra-\nper 100 milliliters of blood or grams of\nstate commerce:\nalcohol per 210 liters of breath.\n(1) Part 385, subparts A and E, for\nBus means any motor vehicle de-\ncarriers subject to the requirements of\nsigned, constructed, and or used for the\n\u00a7385.403 of this chapter.\ntransportation of passengers, including\n(2) Part 386, Rules of practice for\ntaxicabs.\nmotor carrier, broker, freight for-\nBusiness district means the territory\nwarder, and hazardous materials pro-\ncontiguous to and including a highway\nceedings, of this chapter.\nwhen within any 600 feet along such\n(3) Part 387, Minimum Levels of Fi-\nhighway there are buildings in use for\nnancial Responsibility for Motor Car-\nbusiness or industrial purposes, includ-\nriers, to the extent provided in \u00a7387.3 of\ning but not limited to hotels, banks, or\nthis chapter.\noffice buildings which occupy at least\n(4) Section 390.19, Motor carrier iden-\n300 feet of frontage on one side or 300\ntification report, and \u00a7390.21, Marking\nfeet collectively on both sides of the\nof CMVs, for carriers subject to the re-\nhighway.\nquirements of \u00a7385.403 of this chapter.\nCharter transportation of passengers\nIntrastate motor carriers operating\nmeans transportation, using a bus, of a\nprior to January 1, 2005, are excepted\ngroup of persons who pursuant to a\nfrom \u00a7390.19(a)(1).\ncommon purpose, under a single con-\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988, as amended at 54 tract, at a fixed charge for the motor\nFR 12202, Mar. 24, 1989; 58 FR 33776, June 21, vehicle, have acquired the exclusive\n1993; 59 FR 8752, Feb. 23, 1994; 59 FR 67554, use of the motor vehicle to travel to-\nDec. 29, 1994; 62 FR 1296, Jan. 9, 1997; 63 FR\ngether under an itinerary either speci-\n33276, June 18, 1998; 64 FR 48516, Sept. 3, 1999;\nfied in advance or modified after hav-\n66 FR 2766, Jan. 11, 2001; 68 FR 47875, Aug. 12,\n2003; 69 FR 39372, June 30, 2004] ing left the place of origin.\nCommercial motor vehicle means any\n\u00a7390.5 Definitions. self-propelled or towed motor vehicle\nUnless specifically defined elsewhere, used on a highway in interstate com-\nin this subchapter: merce to transport passengers or prop-\nAccident means\u2014 erty when the vehicle\u2014\n(1) Except as provided in paragraph (1) Has a gross vehicle weight rating\n(2) of this definition, an occurrence in- or gross combination weight rating, or\nvolving a commercial motor vehicle gross vehicle weight or gross combina-\noperating on a highway in interstate or tion weight, of 4,536 kg (10,001 pounds)\nintrastate commerce which results in: or more, whichever is greater; or\n(i) A fatality; (2) Is designed or used to transport\n(ii) Bodily injury to a person who, as more than 8 passengers (including the\na result of the injury, immediately re- driver) for compensation; or\nceives medical treatment away from (3) Is designed or used to transport\nthe scene of the accident; or more than 15 passengers, including the\n309\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00321 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.5 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\ndriver, and is not used to transport pas- (i) Damage which can be remedied\nsengers for compensation; or temporarily at the scene of the acci-\n(4) Is used in transporting material dent without special tools or parts.\nfound by the Secretary of Transpor- (ii) Tire disablement without other\ntation to be hazardous under 49 U.S.C. damage even if no spare tire is avail-\n5103 and transported in a quantity re- able.\nquiring placarding under regulations (iii) Headlamp or taillight damage.\nprescribed by the Secretary under 49 (iv) Damage to turn signals, horn, or\nCFR, subtitle B, chapter I, subchapter windshield wipers which makes them\ninoperative.\nC.\nDriveaway-towaway operation means\nConviction means an unvacated adju-\nan operation in which an empty or un-\ndication of guilt, or a determination\nladen motor vehicle with one or more\nthat a person has violated or failed to\nsets of wheels on the surface of the\ncomply with the law in a court of origi-\nroadway is being transported:\nnal jurisdiction or by an authorized ad-\n(1) Between vehicle manufacturer\u2019s\nministrative tribunal, an unvacated\nfacilities;\nforfeiture of bail or collateral depos-\n(2) Between a vehicle manufacturer\nited to secure the person\u2019s appearance and a dealership or purchaser;\nin court, a plea of guilty or nolo (3) Between a dealership, or other en-\ncontendere accepted by the court, the tity selling or leasing the vehicle, and\npayment of a fine or court cost, or vio- a purchaser or lessee;\nlation of a condition of release without (4) To a motor carrier\u2019s terminal or\nbail, regardless of whether or not the repair facility for the repair of dis-\npenalty is rebated, suspended, or pro- abling damage (as defined in \u00a7390.5) fol-\nbated. lowing a crash; or\nDirect assistance means transpor- (5) To a motor carrier\u2019s terminal or\ntation and other relief services pro- repair facility for repairs associated\nvided by a motor carrier or its driver(s) with the failure of a vehicle component\nincident to the immediate restoration or system; or\nof essential services (such as, elec- (6) By means of a saddle-mount or\ntricity, medial care, sewer, water, tele- tow-bar.\ncommunications, and telecommuni- Driver means any person who oper-\ncation transmissions) or essential sup- ates any commercial motor vehicle.\nplies (such as, food and fuel). It does Driving a commercial motor vehicle\nnot include transportation related to while under the influence of alcohol\nlong-term rehabilitation of damaged means committing any one or more of\nphysical infrastructure or routine com- the following acts in a CMV: Driving a\nmercial deliveries after the initial CMV while the person\u2019s alcohol con-\ncentration is 0.04 or more; driving\nthreat to life and property has passed.\nunder the influence of alcohol, as pre-\nDirect compensation means payment\nscribed by State law; or refusal to un-\nmade to the motor carrier by the pas-\ndergo such testing as is required by\nsengers or a person acting on behalf of\nany State or jurisdiction in the en-\nthe passengers for the transportation\nforcement of Table 1 to \u00a7383.51 or\nservices provided, and not included in a\n\u00a7392.5(a)(2) of this subchapter.\ntotal package charge or other assess-\nEmergency means any hurricane, tor-\nment for highway transportation serv-\nnado, storm (e.g. thunderstorm, snow-\nices.\nstorm, icestorm, blizzard, sandstorm,\nDisabling damage means damage etc.), high water, wind-driven water,\nwhich precludes departure of a motor tidal wave, tsunami, earthquake, vol-\nvehicle from the scene of the accident canic eruption, mud slide, drought, for-\nin its usual manner in daylight after est fire, explosion, blackout or other\nsimple repairs. occurrence, natural or man-made,\n(1) Inclusions. Damage to motor vehi- which interrupts the delivery of essen-\ncles that could have been driven, but tial services (such as, electricity, med-\nwould have been further damaged if so ical care, sewer, water, telecommuni-\ndriven. cations, and telecommunication trans-\n(2) Exclusions. missions) or essential supplies (such as,\n310\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00322 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\nFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nfood and fuel) or otherwise imme- B of this chapter. The term \u2018\u2018exempt\ndiately threatens human life or public intracity zone\u2019\u2019 does not include any\nwelfare, provided such hurricane, tor- municipality or commercial zone in\nnado, or other event results in: the State of Hawaii. For purposes of\n(1) A declaration of an emergency by \u00a7391.62, a driver may be considered to\nthe President of the United States, the operate a commercial motor vehicle\nGovernor of a State, or their author- wholly within an exempt intracity zone\nized representatives having authority notwithstanding any common control,\nto declare emergencies; by the FMCSA management, or arrangement for a\nField Administrator for the geo- continuous carriage or shipment to or\ngraphical area in which the occurrence from a point without such zone.\nhappens; or by other Federal, State or Exempt motor carrier means a person\nlocal government officials having au- engaged in transportation exempt from\nthority to declare emergencies, or economic regulation by the Federal\n(2) A request by a police officer for Motor Carrier Safety Administration\ntow trucks to move wrecked or dis- (FMCSA) under 49 U.S.C. 13506. \u2018\u2018Ex-\nabled motor vehicles. empt motor carriers\u2019\u2019 are subject to\nEmergency relief means an operation the safety regulations set forth in this\nin which a motor carrier or driver of a subchapter.\ncommercial motor vehicle is providing Farm vehicle driver means a person\ndirect assistance to supplement State who drives only a commercial motor\nand local efforts and capabilities to vehicle that is\u2014\nsave lives or property or to protect (a) Controlled and operated by a\npublic health and safety as a result of farmer as a private motor carrier of\nan emergency as defined in this sec- property;\ntion. (b) Being used to transport either\u2014\nEmployee means any individual, other (1) Agricultural products, or\nthan an employer, who is employed by (2) Farm machinery, farm supplies,\nan employer and who in the course of or both, to or from a farm;\nhis or her employment directly affects (c) Not being used in the operation of\ncommercial motor vehicle safety. Such a for-hire motor carrier;\nterm includes a driver of a commercial (d) Not carrying hazardous materials\nmotor vehicle (including an inde- of a type or quantity that requires the\npendent contractor while in the course commercial motor vehicle to be plac-\nof operating a commercial motor vehi- arded in accordance with \u00a7177.823 of\ncle), a mechanic, and a freight handler. this subtitle; and\nSuch term does not include an em- (e) Being used within 150 air-miles of\nployee of the United States, any State, the farmer\u2019s farm.\nany political subdivision of a State, or Farmer means any person who oper-\nany agency established under a com- ates a farm or is directly involved in\npact between States and approved by the cultivation of land, crops, or live-\nthe Congress of the United States who stock which\u2014\nis acting within the course of such em- (a) Are owned by that person; or\nployment. (b) Are under the direct control of\nEmployer means any person engaged that person.\nin a business affecting interstate com- Fatality means any injury which re-\nmerce who owns or leases a commer- sults in the death of a person at the\ncial motor vehicle in connection with time of the motor vehicle accident or\nthat business, or assigns employees to within 30 days of the accident.\noperate it, but such terms does not in- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminis-\nclude the United States, any State, any trator means the chief executive of the\npolitical subdivision of a State, or an Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminis-\nagency established under a compact be- tration, an agency within the Depart-\ntween States approved by the Congress ment of Transportation.\nof the United States. For-hire motor carrier means a person\nExempt intracity zone means the geo- engaged in the transportation of goods\ngraphic area of a municipality or the or passengers for compensation.\ncommercial zone of that municipality Gross combination weight rating\ndescribed in appendix F to subchapter (GCWR) means the value specified by\n311\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00323 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.5 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\nthe manufacturer as the loaded weight Interstate commerce means trade, traf-\nof a combination (articulated) motor fic, or transportation in the United\nvehicle. In the absence of a value speci- States\u2014\nfied by the manufacturer, GCWR will (1) Between a place in a State and a\nbe determined by adding the GVWR of place outside of such State (including a\nthe power unit and the total weight of place outside of the United States);\nthe towed unit and any load thereon. (2) Between two places in a State\nGross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) through another State or a place out-\nmeans the value specified by the manu- side of the United States; or\nfacturer as the loaded weight of a sin- (3) Between two places in a State as\ngle motor vehicle. part of trade, traffic, or transportation\nHazardous material means a substance originating or terminating outside the\nor material which has been determined State or the United States.\nby the Secretary of Transportation to Intrastate commerce means any trade,\nbe capable of posing an unreasonable traffic, or transportation in any State\nrisk to health, safety, and property which is not described in the term\nwhen transported in commerce, and \u2018\u2018interstate commerce.\u2019\u2019\nwhich has been so designated. Medical examiner means a person who\nHazardous substance means a mate- is licensed, certified, and/or registered,\nrial, and its mixtures or solutions, that in accordance with applicable State\nis identified in the appendix to \u00a7172.101, laws and regulations, to perform phys-\nList of Hazardous Substances and Re- ical examinations. The term includes\nportable Quantities, of this title when but is not limited to, doctors of medi-\noffered for transportation in one pack- cine, doctors of osteopathy, physician\nage, or in one transport motor vehicle assistants, advanced practice nurses,\nif not packaged, and when the quantity and doctors of chiropractic.\nof the material therein equals or ex- Motor carrier means a for-hire motor\nceeds the reportable quantity (RQ). carrier or a private motor carrier. The\nThis definition does not apply to petro- term includes a motor carrier\u2019s agents,\nleum products that are lubricants or officers and representatives as well as\nfuels, or to mixtures or solutions of employees responsible for hiring, su-\nhazardous substances if in a concentra- pervising, training, assigning, or dis-\ntion less than that shown in the table patching of drivers and employees con-\nin \u00a7171.8 of this title, based on the re- cerned with the installation, inspec-\nportable quantity (RQ) specified for the tion, and maintenance of motor vehicle\nmaterials listed in the appendix to equipment and/or accessories. For pur-\n\u00a7172.101. poses of subchapter B, this definition\nHazardous waste means any material includes the terms employer, and exempt\nthat is subject to the hazardous waste motor carrier.\nmanifest requirements of the EPA Motor vehicle means any vehicle, ma-\nspecified in 40 CFR part 262 or would be chine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer\nsubject to these requirements absent propelled or drawn by mechanical\nan interim authorization to a State power and used upon the highways in\nunder 40 CFR part 123, subpart F. the transportation of passengers or\nHighway means any road, street, or property, or any combination thereof\nway, whether on public or private prop- determined by the Federal Motor Car-\nerty, open to public travel. \u2018\u2018Open to rier Safety Administration, but does\npublic travel\u2019\u2019 means that the road sec- not include any vehicle, locomotive, or\ntion is available, except during sched- car operated exclusively on a rail or\nuled periods, extreme weather or emer- rails, or a trolley bus operated by elec-\ngency conditions, passable by four- tric power derived from a fixed over-\nwheel standard passenger cars, and head wire, furnishing local passenger\nopen to the general public for use with- transportation similar to street-rail-\nout restrictive gates, prohibitive signs, way service.\nor regulation other than restrictions Multiple-employer driver means a driv-\nbased on size, weight, or class of reg- er, who in any period of 7 consecutive\nistration. Toll plazas of public toll days, is employed or used as a driver by\nroads are not considered restrictive more than one motor carrier.\ngates. Operator\u2014See driver.\n312\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00324 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\nFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nOther terms\u2014Any other term used in Radar detector means any device or\nthis subchapter is used in its com- mechanism to detect the emission of\nmonly accepted meaning, except where radio microwaves, laser beams or any\nsuch other term has been defined else- other future speed measurement tech-\nwhere in this subchapter. In that nology employed by enforcement per-\nevent, the definition therein given sonnel to measure the speed of com-\nshall apply. mercial motor vehicles upon public\nOut-of-service order means a declara- roads and highways for enforcement\ntion by an authorized enforcement offi- purposes. Excluded from this definition\ncer of a Federal, State, Canadian, are radar detection devices that meet\nMexican, or local jurisdiction that a both of the following requirements:\ndriver, a commercial motor vehicle, or (1) Transported outside the driver\u2019s\na motor carrier operation, is out-of- compartment of the commercial motor\nservice pursuant to \u00a7\u00a7386.72, 392.5, vehicle. For this purpose, the driver\u2019s\n395.13, 396.9, or compatible laws, or the compartment of a passenger-carrying\nNorth American Uniform Out-of-Serv- CMV shall include all space designed to\nice Criteria. accommodate both the driver and the\npassengers; and\nPerson means any individual, part-\n(2) Completely inaccessible to, inop-\nnership, association, corporation, busi-\nerable by, and imperceptible to the\nness trust, or any other organized\ndriver while operating the commercial\ngroup of individuals.\nmotor vehicle.\nPrevious employer means any DOT\nRegional Director of Motor Carriers\nregulated person who employed the\nmeans the Field Administrator, Fed-\ndriver in the preceding 3 years, includ-\neral Motor Carrier Safety Administra-\ning any possible current employer.\ntion, for a given geographical area of\nPrincipal place of business means the\nthe United States.\nsingle location designated by the\nResidential district means the terri-\nmotor carrier, normally its head-\ntory adjacent to and including a high-\nquarters, for purposes of identification\nway which is not a business district\nunder this subchapter. The motor car-\nand for a distance of 300 feet or more\nrier must make records required by\nalong the highway is primarily im-\nparts 382, 387, 390, 391, 395, 396, and 397\nproved with residences.\nof this subchapter available for inspec-\nSchool bus means a passenger motor\ntion at this location within 48 hours vehicle which is designed or used to\n(Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holi- carry more than 10 passengers in addi-\ndays excluded) after a request has been tion to the driver, and which the Sec-\nmade by a special agent or authorized retary determines is likely to be sig-\nrepresentative of the Federal Motor nificantly used for the purpose of\nCarrier Safety Administration. transporting preprimary, primary, or\nPrivate motor carrier means a person secondary school students to such\nwho provides transportation of prop- schools from home or from such\nerty or passengers, by commercial schools to home.\nmotor vehicle, and is not a for-hire School bus operation means the use of\nmotor carrier. a school bus to transport only school\nPrivate motor carrier of passengers children and/or school personnel from\n(business) means a private motor car- home to school and from school to\nrier engaged in the interstate transpor- home.\ntation of passengers which is provided Secretary means the Secretary of\nin the furtherance of a commercial en- Transportation.\nterprise and is not available to the pub- Single-employer driver means a driver\nlic at large. who, in any period of 7 consecutive\nPrivate motor carrier of passengers days, is employed or used as a driver\n(nonbusiness) means private motor car- solely by a single motor carrier. This\nrier involved in the interstate trans- term includes a driver who operates a\nportation of passengers that does not commercial motor vehicle on an inter-\notherwise meet the definition of a pri- mittent, casual, or occasional basis.\nvate motor carrier of passengers (busi- Special agent See appendix B to sub-\nness). chapter B\u2014Special agents.\n313\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00325 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.7 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\nState means a State of the United (3) Words imparting the present tense\nStates and the District of Columbia include the future tense.\nand includes a political subdivision of a (b) In this subchapter the word\u2014\nState. (1) Officer includes any person au-\nTrailer includes: thorized by law to perform the duties\n(a) Full trailer means any motor vehi- of the office;\ncle other than a pole trailer which is (2) Writing includes printing and\ndesigned to be drawn by another motor typewriting;\nvehicle and so constructed that no part (3) Shall is used in an imperative\nof its weight, except for the towing de- sense;\nvice, rests upon the self-propelled tow- (4) Must is used in an imperative\ning motor vehicle. A semitrailer sense;\nequipped with an auxiliary front axle (5) Should is used in a recommenda-\n(converter dolly) shall be considered a tory sense;\nfull trailer. (6) May is used in a permissive sense;\n(b) Pole trailer means any motor vehi- and\ncle which is designed to be drawn by (7) Includes is used as a word of inclu-\nanother motor vehicle and attached to sion, not limitation.\nthe towing motor vehicle by means of a\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988, as amended at 60\n\u2018\u2018reach\u2019\u2019 or \u2018\u2018pole,\u2019\u2019 or by being\nFR 38744, July 28, 1995]\n\u2018\u2018boomed\u2019\u2019 or otherwise secured to the\ntowing motor vehicle, for transporting\nSubpart B\u2014General Requirements\nlong or irregularly shaped loads such\nand Information\nas poles, pipes, or structural members,\nwhich generally are capable of sus-\n\u00a7390.9 State and local laws, effect on.\ntaining themselves as beams between\nthe supporting connections. Except as otherwise specifically indi-\n(c) Semitrailer means any motor vehi- cated, subchapter B of this chapter is\ncle, other than a pole trailer, which is not intended to preclude States or sub-\ndesigned to be drawn by another motor divisions thereof from establishing or\nvehicle and is constructed so that some enforcing State or local laws relating\npart of its weight rests upon the self- to safety, the compliance with which\npropelled towing motor vehicle. would not prevent full compliance with\nTruck means any self-propelled com- these regulations by the person subject\nmercial motor vehicle except a truck thereto.\ntractor, designed and/or used for the\n\u00a7390.11 Motor carrier to require ob-\ntransportation of property.\nservance of driver regulations.\nTruck tractor means a self-propelled\nWhenever in part 325 of subchapter A\ncommercial motor vehicle designed\nor in this subchapter a duty is pre-\nand/or used primarily for drawing other\nscribed for a driver or a prohibition is\nvehicles.\nimposed upon the driver, it shall be the\nUnited States means the 50 States and\nduty of the motor carrier to require ob-\nthe District of Columbia.\nservance of such duty or prohibition. If\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988] the motor carrier is a driver, the driver\nshall likewise be bound.\nEDITORIALNOTE: For FEDERALREGISTERci-\ntations affecting \u00a7390.5, see the List of CFR\n\u00a7390.13 Aiding or abetting violations.\nSections Affected, which appears in the\nFinding Aids section of the printed volume No person shall aid, abet, encourage,\nand on GPO Access. or require a motor carrier or its em-\nployees to violate the rules of this\n\u00a7390.7 Rules of construction.\nchapter.\n(a) In part 325 of subchapter A and in\nthis subchapter, unless the context re- \u00a7390.15 Assistance in investigations\nquires otherwise: and special studies.\n(1) Words imparting the singular in- (a) A motor carrier must make all\nclude the plural; records and information pertaining to\n(2) Words imparting the plural in- an accident available to an authorized\nclude the singular; representative or special agent of the\n314\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00326 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/CFR-2005-title49-vol5-sec390-5.pdf", "filename": "CFR-2005-title49-vol5-sec390-5.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.459666", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell", "recipient_email": "JMS_HELL@yahoo.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm.", "body": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm. Thank you.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:49 AM wrote:\nDEAR RYAN:\nSorry for the delay. It\u2019s been a rather hectic week.\nYour next court hearing is August 20 at 9:30 a.m. The judge authorized you to appear via Zoom for this hearing.\nAre you available today at around 3:00 p.m. to have a teleconference to discuss your case?\nSincerely,\nBrian Chase\nLaw Offices of Brian Chase, PLLC\n7 E Street S.E.\nQuincy, WA 98848\n(509) 787-9000\n(F) (509) 787-9040\nNOTICE:\nThis electronic communication and any attachments may contain privileged or other confidential information and\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nremain for the sole use of the named addressee, who is the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use,\ndisclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply email\nand immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments without copying, transmitting, or\ndisclosing the contents. Thank you.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:23 PM\nTo: Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell \nSubject: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304\nGood morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for\nme to appear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to\ngo over the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all\ncouncils assigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to\ncite formally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a\nyear.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record,\nabout the urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD\nfile though and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the\npark.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the\ntime of alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she\nmade to conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd\nrescue with these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work\nthe 911 centers They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know\nbetter than that. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other\ncommon sense stuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering\nsimple critical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and\n\u201cwhy didn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and\nfederal relief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail\nof sloppy cover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty\nattempt to cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and there\nhave been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel, presumably\nunder some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom 911. I\u2019ve been lied\nto on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse to consult for over 9\nmonths. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his office. When I arrived to\nwatch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces of video that would put the\nprosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy scrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names threatening\nto assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again and get them to\nintervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone\nand say \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow operator\nsaid \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s free to go\nby me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false but entirely\ninflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty maddening. Because I\nnot only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed as they destroyed my\ntransmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over 2900 all said on that.\nAnd I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER investigations\ninto Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then settled lawsuit\nan ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king county medical\nexaminers. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s evidence\nof needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to us.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were\nnot allowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding\nirreversible irreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911\ncalls; and also I think one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the\nspoilation of my voice audio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her\nto not let my passenger die. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council\nmember then Jeremiah shows up, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website.\nLook around the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made\nregarding dispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can murder\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nme but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can block me\naway then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case\n2 attachments\n07-05-24 24C06401 Hell Ryan Report.pdf\n1623K\nID#8385903208920250714161223.pdf\n991K", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.611668", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "\"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\"", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nPolice Report\n1 message\nBeto Martinez Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:34 AM\nTo: \"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\" \nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.", "body": "Gmail - Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nPolice Report\n1 message\nBeto Martinez Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:34 AM\nTo: \"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\" \nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\nScan044.pdf\n9631K\n1 of 1 1/24/26, 2:11 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_PoliceReport-JustinTitusAug12-2024.pdf", "filename": "email_PoliceReport-JustinTitusAug12-2024.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.591656", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A.", "body": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A. 46. 020. 2bii Felony Harassment Threats to Kill.\nDuring my intersctiona with Ryan I took notice of how at ti-11 he appeared to be\nparanoid and had rapid speech. He seemed to believe things such H how people\nwere after him and wanted to kill hi111.\nSgt, Musgrove obtained a signed written statement from\n( 1. Although I will transcribe these stateNnt in\nJlt'J\nnarrative to the\nbest of my ability, please review their written statement as a part of your\nreview of this case.\n\"Mid day on 7-4-24 I learned of a stranded motorist on Colockum Paas Rd, which\nis not tar my residence. I went to help the stranded 1110tori11ts as one of\nthem was diabetic and waa not feeling well. Upon arrival, the male and female\nboth looked very hot, and the fensle was not feeling well. I told both of them\nwho I waa and that I waa a volunteer firefighter and was offering to take them\nback to my place, out of the heat, to wait for the tow coq,any that had been\ncalled. Both the 11111le and felllllle were very appreciative for the help. We loaded\neveryone into Jlf'J personal vehicle and returned to my house, including their 2\ndoga. Ille sat in my shop and waited for the tow company. At one point prior to\nreturning to my place, the male tried to give me 1110ney, which I refused, stating\nthe reason I was helping was to get them out of the heat, and the fe11111lea\ndiabetic issues, which were resolved with orange juice and some candy.\nApproxi11111tely 1,5 hours after arriving at fir/ place, the tow coiapany returned\nwith their truck, having replaced a flat tire and driving it out for them. I waa\nin the shop and walked outside where the male half was talking with the tow\nco111p11ny. He then said that we were trying to acam hi\u2022 as he walked up and got in\nmy face, accusing me of tricking him into a aca111. He became 1110re irate, and then\nstated that he was going to leave and get guns, conie back and shoot the place\nup. Thia is when I called Rivercoa and asked Lg to step it up, as they were\nalready enroute. The male continued to yell and accuse of iq,eraonating a\n11111\ncity equoyee and yelling obenities. He began calling my wife na11111a. I told him\nhe needed to calm down, and he reacted by peeling his veat off and pulled a\nfolding knife off hia hip, opened it, and stood in a stance ready to fight. I\ncalled Rivercom again and stayed on the line until LE was out with the male.\u2022\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written statements from\nAlthough I will transcribe these atate111ent in my narrative to the beat of Jlt'J\nability, please review their written atate-nt aa a part of your review of this\ncase.\n\"I Drove with my Husband Jeremiah to help out ao- people that were in Need of\nHelp aa we got there a lady and a man was there I then gave the wo11111n aon, water\ndue to She was the one that needed help 1110re. Apond Notice there truck had a\nflat tire and riding on ri111e, the man said that he would pay ua for the ride\ndown till a tow truck came and got the truck we told him that was not needed\njust pay our part forward then we told him that he need to take up pay for tow\nwith thein, everything was fine till tow pick up truck and they told him he\nneeded to money for the tow, they talked for a few then the man got into my\nhuabanda face an~ told hia that 1101118 one was going to get hurt and shot if thP.y\ntake hill true-;;, aft~r that. I ., lat\"terl to recored and then he pulled a knife and\ngot that on v.ledo aa well, lie began taking crap to 111e ao I got a little mouthey.\nhe was all over the board. With threatening\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written state-nt from ),\nAlthough I will transcribe these statement in my narrative to the beat of my\nability, please review their written statement aa a part of your review of this\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "filename": "email_Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "size_mb": 0.39, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.527643", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified\nof me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice\nto share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not\nonly make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.640668", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "United States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Report successfully submitted\nPlease save your record number for tracking.", "body": "United States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division.\nReport successfully submitted\nPlease save your record number for tracking.\nYour record number is:\n616411-TZV\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights\nviolations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.\n2 Our specialists determine the next step\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the Justice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report. If so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your report and will\nrecommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid organization.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 1 of 4\n3 When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not always be\nable to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you provided in this\nreport. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you need to reach us about\nyour report, please refer to your report number when contacting us. This is how we keep track of\nyour submission.\nWhat you can do next\n1 Contact local legal aid organizations or a lawyer if you haven\u2019t already\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help you with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices), to help you find a legal aid lawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-\nlegal-aid\n2 Get help immediately if you are in danger\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still experiencing\nphysical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911 and contact the police.\nYour submission\nContact\nContact information\nYour name\nRyan Hell\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 2 of 4\nEmail address\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nPhone number\n+12677772344\nAddress\n11015 10th Ave sw\n-\nSeattle, Washington 98144\nAre you now or have ever been an active duty service member?\nNo\nPrimary concern\nWhat is your primary reason for contacting the Civil Rights Division?\nSomething else happened\nLocation\nWhere did this happen?\nOrganization name\n7599 Colockum Road\nAddress\n-\n-\nMalaga, Washington\nPersonal characteristics\nDo you believe any of these personal characteristics influenced why you were treated this\nway?\nDisability (including temporary or recovered and including HIV and drug addiction)\nReligion\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 3 of 4\nOther reason\nDate\nWhen did this happen?\n7/4/2024\nPersonal description\nIn your own words, describe what happened\nOn July 4, 2024, I, Ryan Hell, and my disabled friend (Type 1 diabetic with a brain tumor) were\nstranded in Chelan County, WA, after a flat tire on Colockum Rd. I called 911 for her diabetic\nshock. The dispatcher refused an ambulance, hung up, and rudely insisted a city councilman and\nmechanic take us to a ranch house (7599 Colockum Rd), promising medical help. No ambulance\narrived. At the ranch, we were separated. I was beaten, struck in the head, and extorted for $1,000\ncash by off-duty dispatchers, who threatened to kill me. Video evidence at the courthouse shows\none dispatcher threatening to \u201cbeat my ass\u201d for refusing to pay for \u201csaving\u201d my friend\u2019s life, de-\nspite no medical aid. They tried to provoke a fight, likely for a \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d setup. I re-\nfused to abandon my friend, a disabled diabetic, fearing they\u2019d kill her and frame me. The police\nreport (Incident 24C06401) notes a dispatcher\u2019s sheriff deputy accomplice saying I needed to\n\u201cdisappear for good.\u201d Former Seattle City Councilwoman Sally Bagshaw fled the scene off-road,\nnearly hitting me, as voices yelled, \u201cGo now, police can\u2019t see you!\u201d I posted photos of this on Twit-\nter/Facebook. The tow truck driver, on video, denied any bill or impound, yet I was arrested for\nfelony harassment (RCW 9A.46.020.2bii) based on a fabricated dispute. My lawyers have\nstonewalled or resigned; evidence may vanish. I\u2019m now gang-stalked by violent groups on my usu-\nal paths, fearing for my life as a whistleblower. Washington\u2019s FBI, law firms, and ACLU refuse to\nact. My DOJ complaint (612685-QZC) was rejected for \u201cinsufficient details\u201d despite a 500-charac-\nter form limit. Investigate this conspiracy, civil rights violations, and ongoing stalking. Contact me\nfor evidence.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 4 of 4\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/CivilRightsIntakeDoJ.pdf", "filename": "CivilRightsIntakeDoJ.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.847659", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Find related posts... Powered by Algolia Log in Create account\nShoubhit Dash\nShoubhit Dash\nPosted on Aug 11, 2022 \u2022 Updated on Mar 28, 2023\n81\nFollow\n65 16\nAdd\nreaction\nBuild a full stack app with Hi, I'm Shoubhit.", "body": "Find related posts... Powered by Algolia Log in Create account\nShoubhit Dash\nShoubhit Dash\nPosted on Aug 11, 2022 \u2022 Updated on Mar 28, 2023\n81\nFollow\n65 16\nAdd\nreaction\nBuild a full stack app with Hi, I'm Shoubhit. I'm a 17 y/o self-taught\ndeveloper and I like to build cool stuff.\n20\nJump to\ncreate-t3-app JOINED\nComments\nMar 11, 2022\n67\n#webdev #nextjs #tutorial\nSave\nMore from Shoubhit Dash\nThis blog post is outdated. I no longer have time to keep updating this post.\nWhy I Switched From Neovim to VSCode\nHey there! Today we'll be building an application with the T3 stack. We're going #webdev #programming #vscode #vim\nto build a Guestbook inspired by Lee Robinson's Guestbook. Let's get right into\nImplementing the Pipe Operator in\nit!\nTypeScript\n#typescript #functional #programming #tutorial\nGetting Started\nLet's set up a starter project with create-t3-app ! Typesafe Database Queries on the Edge\n#typescript #sql #webdev\nnpm create t3-app@latest\nAxiom PROMOTED\nWe're going to utilize all parts of the stack.\n?Whatwillyourprojectbecalled?guestbook\n?WillyoubeusingJavaScriptorTypeScript?TypeScript\nGoodchoice!UsingTypeScript!\n?Whichpackageswouldyouliketoenable?nextAuth,prisma,tailwind,trpc\n?Initializeanewgitrepository?Yes\nNiceone!Initializingrepository!\nSampling is an anti-pattern\n?Wouldyoulikeustorunppminstall?Yes\npromoted by Big\nAlright.We'llinstallthedependenciesforyou!\nObservability\nUsing:pnpm\nEasy. Understandable. Affordable. Log it all.\nLet's also set up a Postgres database on Railway. Railway makes it super simple\nLog it now.\nto quickly set up a database.\nLog it with Axiom\nGo to Railway and log in with GitHub if you haven't already. Now click on\nNew\n.\nProject\nNow provision Postgres.\nIt's as simple as that. Copy the connection string from the tab.\nConnect\nLet's start coding! Open the project in your favourite code editor.\nThere are a lot of folders but don't be overwhelmed. Here's a basic overview.\n- The schema.\nprisma/* prisma\n- Static assets including fonts and images.\npublic/*\n- Validation for environment variables.\nsrc/env/*\n- All the pages of the website.\nsrc/pages/*\n- The backend, which includes a tRPC server, Prisma client,\nsrc/server/*\nand auth utility.\n- Global CSS files, but we're going to be using Tailwind CSS\nsrc/styles/*\nfor most of our styles.\n- Next Auth type declarations.\nsrc/types/*\n- Utility functions.\nsrc/utils/*\nDuplicate the file and rename the new copy as . Open the\n.env.example .env\nfile and paste the connection string in .\n.env DATABASE_URL\nYou'll notice we have Discord OAuth set up using , so we also need a\nnext-auth\nand . Let's set that up.\nDISCORD_CLIENT_ID DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET\nSetting up authentication\nGo to the Discord Developers Portal and create a new application.\nGo to and add all of the callback URLs to . For\nOAuth2/General Redirects\nlocalhost the callback URL is\n. I also added the\nhttp://localhost:3000/api/auth/callback/discord\nproduction URL ahead of time.\nCopy the client ID and secret and paste both of them into .\n.env\nUncomment and set it as some random string too. Now we\nNEXTAUTH_SECRET\nhave all of our environment variables configured.\nLet's also change the database to and uncomment the\npostgresql @db.Text\nannotations in the model in . All the models you\nAccount prisma/schema.prisma\nsee in the schema are necessary for Next Auth to work.\nLet's push this schema to our Railway Postgres database. This command will\npush our schema to Railway and generate type definitions for the Prisma client.\nnpx prisma db push\nNow run the dev server.\nnpm run dev\nGo to the file and delete all the code, let's just render a\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\nheading.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst Home = () => {\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nI can't look at light themes, so lets apply some global styles in\nto make this app dark theme.\nsrc/styles/globals.css\n/* src/styles/globals.css */\n@tailwind base;\n@tailwind components;\n@tailwind utilities;\nbody {\n@apply bg-neutral-900 text-neutral-100;\n}\nMuch better.\nIf you look at , you can see we have\nsrc/pages/api/auth/[...nextauth].ts\nDiscord OAuth already set up using Next Auth. Here is where you can add more\nOAuth providers like Google, Twitter, etc.\nNow let's create a button to let users login with Discord. We can use the\nfunction from Next Auth.\nsignIn()\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nWe can use the hook to get the session for the user. While we're\nuseSession()\nat it, we can also use the function to implement log out functionality.\nsignOut()\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn, signOut, useSession } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nif (status === \"loading\") {\nreturn
Loading...
;\n}\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nGIF\nGreat! We now have auth working. Next Auth really makes it stupidly simple.\nBackend\nLet's work on the backend now. We'll be using tRPC for our API layer and\nPrisma for connecting and querying our database.\nWe're going to have to modify our prisma schema and add a model.\nGuestbook\nEach message in the guestbook will have a name and a message. Here's how\nthe model will look like.\nmodel Guestbook {\nid String @id @default(cuid())\ncreatedAt DateTime @default(now())\nname String\nmessage String @db.VarChar(100)\n}\nLet's push this modified schema to our Railway Postgres database.\nnpx prisma db push\nNow let's get to the fun part - it's tRPC time. Go ahead and delete the\nfile in folder. Then in the same folder,\nexample.ts src/server/api/routers\ncreate a new file called .\nguestbook.ts\nFirst, we're going to define a mutation to post messages to our database.\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, publicProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\npostMessage: publicProcedure\n.input(\nz.object({\nname: z.string(),\nmessage: z.string(),\n})\n)\n.mutation(async ({ ctx, input }) => {\ntry {\nawait ctx.prisma.guestbook.create({\ndata: {\nname: input.name,\nmessage: input.message,\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(error);\n}\n}),\n});\nHere we have a tRPC mutation that uses zod to validate the input and has an\nasync function that runs a single prisma query to create a new row in the\ntable.\nGuestbook\nWorking with Prisma is an absolutely wonderful example. The autocomplete and\ntypesafety is amazing.\nWe also want this mutation to be protected. Here we can use tRPC\nmiddlewares.\nIf you take a look at the file, we're using\nsrc/server/auth.ts\nfrom Next Auth that gives us access to the session\nunstable_getServerSession\non the server.\n// src/server/auth.ts\nimport { type GetServerSidePropsContext } from \"next\";\nimport { unstable_getServerSession } from \"next-auth\";\nimport { authOptions } from \"../pages/api/auth/[...nextauth]\";\nexport const getServerAuthSession = async (ctx: {\nreq: GetServerSidePropsContext[\"req\"];\nres: GetServerSidePropsContext[\"res\"];\n}) => {\nreturn await unstable_getServerSession(ctx.req, ctx.res, authOptions);\n};\nWe're passing that session into our tRPC context.\n// src/server/api/trpc.ts\nexport const createTRPCContext = async (opts: CreateNextContextOptions) => {\nconst { req, res } = opts;\nconst session = await getServerAuthSession({ req, res });\nreturn createInnerTRPCContext({\nsession,\n});\n};\nThen, we can use this session to make our mutation protected using a\n.\nprotectedProcedure\n// src/server/api/trpc.ts\nconst enforceUserIsAuthed = t.middleware(({ ctx, next }) => {\nif (!ctx.session || !ctx.session.user) {\nthrow new TRPCError({ code: \"UNAUTHORIZED\" });\n}\nreturn next({\nctx: {\nsession: { ...ctx.session, user: ctx.session.user },\n},\n});\n});\nexport const protectedProcedure = t.procedure.use(enforceUserIsAuthed);\nNow, replace with to make our mutation\npublicProcedure protectedProcedure\nprotected from unauthenticated users.\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, protectedProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\npostMessage: protectedProcedure\n.input(\nz.object({\nname: z.string(),\nmessage: z.string(),\n})\n)\n.mutation(async ({ ctx, input }) => {\ntry {\nawait ctx.prisma.guestbook.create({\ndata: {\nname: input.name,\nmessage: input.message,\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(error);\n}\n}),\n});\nNext, let's write a query to get all messages in the guestbook. We want all\nguests to see the messages so we'll use the for this.\npublicProcedure\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, protectedProcedure, publicProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\ngetAll: publicProcedure.query(async ({ ctx }) => {\ntry {\nreturn await ctx.prisma.guestbook.findMany({\nselect: {\nname: true,\nmessage: true,\n},\norderBy: {\ncreatedAt: \"desc\",\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(\"error\", error);\n}\n}),\n//...\nHere we are getting just the name and message from all the rows from the\nmodel. The rows are sorted in descending order by the\nGuestbook createdAt\nfield.\nNow merge this router in the main .\nappRouter\n// src/server/api/root.ts\nimport { createTRPCRouter } from \"./trpc\";\nimport { guestbookRouter } from \"./routers/guestbook\";\nexport const appRouter = createTRPCRouter({\nguestbook: guestbookRouter,\n});\n// export type definition of API\nexport type AppRouter = typeof appRouter;\nWe're pretty much done on the backend part. Let's work on the UI next.\nFrontend\nLet's first center everything.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn, signOut, useSession } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nif (status === \"loading\") {\nreturn
Loading...
;\n}\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n

\nTutorial for create-t3-app\n

\n
\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n
\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nI also made the heading bigger and added some padding between the\nelements.\nLet's use our tRPC query to get all the messages for the guestbook in the\ndatabase. But we don't have any data right now. We can use Prisma Studio to\nadd some data manually.\nnpx prisma studio\nIt will automatically open on . Go to the table\nhttp://localhost:5555 Guestbook\nand add a bunch of records like this.\nGIF\nNow that we have data, we can use the query and display the data. For this we\ncan use the tRPC wrapper. Let's create a component for this in\nreact-query\n.\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { api } from \"../utils/api\";\nconst GuestbookEntries = () => {\nconst { data: guestbookEntries, isLoading } = api.guestbook.getAll.useQuery();\nif (isLoading) return
Fetching messages...
;\nreturn (\n
\n{guestbookEntries?.map((entry, index) => {\nreturn (\n
\n

{entry.message}

\n- {entry.name}\n
\n);\n})}\n
\n);\n};\nHere we're using and mapping over the array it returns.\nuseQuery()\nOf course here too we have wonderful typesafety and autocomplete.\nNow render this component in the component.\nHome\n// src/pages/index.tsx\n
\n

Guestbook

\n

\nTutorial for create-t3-app\n

\n
\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\nLet's now create a form component in and use our tRPC\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\nmutation there.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst Form = () => {\nconst [message, setMessage] = useState(\"\");\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nconst postMessage = api.guestbook.postMessage.useMutation();\nif (status !== \"authenticated\") return null;\nreturn (\n {\nevent.preventDefault();\npostMessage.mutate({\nname: session.user?.name as string,\nmessage,\n});\nsetMessage(\"\");\n}}\n>\n setMessage(event.target.value)}\n/>\n\nSubmit\n\n\n);\n};\nWe can now render the in the component and add some padding.\nForm Home\n// src/pages/index.tsx\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n\n
\n
\nHere we have a form and we're using to post the data to the\nuseMutation()\ndatabase. But you'll notice one problem here. When we click on the submit\nbutton, it does post the message to the database, but the user doesn't get any\nimmediate feedback. Only on refreshing the page, the user can see the new\nmessage.\nFor this we can use optimistic UI updates! makes this trivial to do.\nreact-query\nWe just need to add some stuff to our hook inside the\nuseMutation() Form\ncomponent.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst utils = api.useContext();\nconst postMessage = api.guestbook.postMessage.useMutation({\nonMutate: async (newEntry) => {\nawait utils.guestbook.getAll.cancel();\nutils.guestbook.getAll.setData(undefined, (prevEntries) => {\nif (prevEntries) {\nreturn [newEntry, ...prevEntries];\n} else {\nreturn [newEntry];\n}\n});\n},\nonSettled: async () => {\nawait utils.guestbook.getAll.invalidate();\n},\n});\nIf you want to learn more about this code example, you can read about\noptimistic updates with here.\n@tanstack/react-query\nWe're pretty much done with the coding part! That was pretty simple wasn't it.\nThe T3 stack makes it super easy and quick to build full stack web apps. Let's\nnow deploy our guestbook.\nDeployment\nWe're going to use Vercel to deploy. Vercel makes it really easy to deploy\nNextJS apps, they are the people who made NextJS.\nFirst, push your code to a GitHub repository. Now, go to Vercel and sign up with\nGitHub if you haven't already.\nThen click on and import your newly created repository.\nNew Project\nNow we need to add environment variables, so copy paste all the environment\nvariables to Vercel. After you've done that, click .\nDeploy\nAdd a custom domain if you have one and you're done! Congratulations!\nAll the code can be found here. You can visit the website at guestbook.nxl.sh.\nCredits\nAyanava Karmakar for updating the blog using tRPC v10.\nJulius Marminge and Michael Lee for reviewing the updated blog.\nLee Robinson for the idea of a guestbook.\nAnthony for giving constructive criticism.\nJAR and Krish for proof reading.\nHakan G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc for updating the project files in accordance with the latest\ntemplate (7.3.0).\ncreate-t3-app\nBefore you go\nDo your career a big favor. Join DEV. (The website you're on right now)\nIt takes one minute, it's free, and is worth it for your career.\nGet started\nCommunity matters\nTop comments (20)\nSubscribe\nThe discussion has been locked. New comments can't be added.\nBlog post is outdated\nJoel Almeida \u2022 Sep 11 '22\nThanks a lot for this tutorial! It's very helpful. One thing I would add that I got\nstuck on for a little bit is that you have to run after creating\nprisma generate\nyour schema before you can access the prisma client.\n3 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nYou're welcome!\nautomatically runs for you. Weird it didn't\nprisma db push prisma generate\nwork for you.\n1 like\nLike\nJoel Almeida \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nThat is really strange! I had run , I could see everything\nprisma db push\non railway no problem, but the client didn't work until I also ran\nprisma\n, so yeah, no idea what that's about\ngenerate\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nGlad you got it working!\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Hayes \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nI appreciate the work put in, but to anyone visiting this after March 2023 you\nwill have a hard time following along with this as the folder structures have\nchanged considerably in create-t3-app.\nIt would be really good if you could release an updated version, as this is the\npretty much the first tutorial that pops up in google when you look for a\n(written) t3 tutorial.\nThe big issue is Typescript errors with the return types from your queries. If\nyou follow along to the letter of this tutorial you will be hit by so many red\nlines!\nJust leaving this here for future readers....\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nHey! I know ct3a has changed a lot since this blog post, but with college\napplications and entrance exams right around the corner, I don't have a lot\nof time to keep updating this post and usually rely on the community to\nmake a PR on my website's repo. From there I also update the content on\ndev.to. If you are free enough to update stuff that is broken, feel free to\nmake a PR on my website's repo and I'll update the content here as well.\nThe code is in this repository.\nSorry for not keeping this updated!\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nAlso have you tried restarting the eslint and typescript servers? Many\npeople seem to be facing that issue.\n1 like\nLike\nNecmettin Sarg\u0131n \u2022 Mar 4 '23\nI don't have any knowledge on backend but don't we use something like\nnode/express for backend? Which one does backend work?\n3 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 4 '23\nYeah express is a backend library. Next.js on the other hand is a full stack\nframework, it provides a backend framework as well as a frontend\nframework with routing. Note that Next.js's backend is based on Node\nexcept their edge API routes which have a subset of node features.\n2 likes\nLike\nGedalyaBlau \u2022 Sep 20 '22\nthank you\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 21 '22\nyou're welcome\n1 like\nLike\nRobert Davidson \u2022 Nov 7 '22\nJust finished this tutorial, it was great and lead me on many rabbit holes to\nbetter understand the tech in this stack. Thanks for making it easy to follow!\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Nov 7 '22\nYou're welcome!\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Valladares \u2022 Oct 7 '22\nAwesome job @nexxeln\n1 like\nLike\nCasey Siebel \u2022 Oct 27 '22 \u2022 Edited on Oct 27\nThanks for doing this tutorial and for your work on CTA! I'm really interested in\nthese technologies!! I know versions change often but it's rather frustrating\nthat the code show in this article is different from the code linked in your\ngithub repo. It make's it difficult / impossible to follow along. Especially if I\ndon't know what package versions you were using in this article write up.\nI'd love to see a tutorial that shows how to use next-auth with credential sign\nup and login, in the T3 stack, using cookies and without using JWTTheo talks\nabout it here but I'm having some trouble getting it all wired up:\nyoutube.com/watch?v=h6wBYWWdyYQ\nThanks again!\n1 like\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Oct 27 '22\nThis post will be updated soon to trpc v10. As of next-auth credential auth,\nI wouldn't recommend using it.\n1 like\nLike\nChristian Angelo M Sulit \u2022 Feb 1 '23\nDocker build failing due to env validation.\nSKIP_ENV_VALIDATION=1 doesn't work.\nLike\nhex-paradus \u2022 Mar 28 '23\nI am unable to login to your deployed version with Discord. And I am getting\nthe same error in a personal project of mine. Do you know why that is\nhappening?\n1 like\nLike\nharshmakwana21 \u2022 Feb 14 '23 \u2022 Edited on Feb 14\nWhy am I getting type error on ctx.prisma.guestbook.create ?\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Hayes \u2022 Mar 21 '23\nNot sure but I have the exact same errors...\n1 like\nLike\nView full discussion (20 comments)\nCode of Conduct \u2022 Report abuse\nAuth0 PROMOTED\nReady, set, deploy!\nWith Auth0 and Vercel, your app goes from zero to hero in record time.\nLearn more\nRead next\nFinding Work as a Self-Taught Web Developer in 2024\nNurudeen Amedu - Jul 28\nHow to create a ribbon for a pricing card with Tailwind CSS\nMichael Andreuzza - Aug 2\nUnderstanding optimistic UI and React\u2019s useOptimistic Hook\nMegan Lee - Aug 20\nReal Time Booking App\nPrince Jain - Jul 28\nThank you to our Diamond Sponsor Neon for supporting our community.\nDEV Community \u2014 A constructive and inclusive social network for software developers. With you every step of your journey.\nHome DEV++ Podcasts Videos Tags DEV Help Forem Shop Advertise on DEV DEV Challenges DEV Showcase About Contact Guides Software comparisons\nCode of Conduct Privacy Policy Terms of use\nBuilt on Forem \u2014 the open source software that powers DEV and other inclusive communities.\nMade with love and Ruby on Rails. DEV Community \u00a9 2016 - 2024.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Build a full stack app with create-t3-app - DEV Community.pdf", "filename": "email_Build a full stack app with create-t3-app - DEV Community.pdf", "size_mb": 1.54, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.343653", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nTotal Number of Redactions in Document: 1\nRedaction Reasons by Page\nPage Reason Description Occurrences\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security\nnumbers credit card numbers or bank or\nother financial account numbers except\nwhen disclosure is expressly required by\nor governed by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\nPersonal chapter. \u201cOther financial account\n1 1\nInformation numbers\u201d applies to information such as\nsocial security numbers (as defined in\nRCW 9.35.005). Specific investigative\nrecords compiled by law enforcement\nagencies the nondisclosure is essential for\nthe protection of any person\u2019s right to\nprivacy. Disclosure of social security\nnumbers would be highly offensive to a\nreasonable person and is not of legitimate\nconcern to the public.\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nRedaction Reasons by Exemption\nPages\nReason Description\n(Count)\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security numbers\ncredit card numbers or bank or other\nfinancial account numbers except when\ndisclosure is expressly required by or\ngoverned by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\n1(1)\nPersonal Information chapter. \u201cOther financial account numbers\u201d\napplies to information such as social\nsecurity numbers (as defined in RCW\n9.35.005). Specific investigative records\ncompiled by law enforcement agencies the\nnondisclosure is essential for the protection\nof any person\u2019s right to privacy. Disclosure\nof social security numbers would be highly\noffensive to a reasonable person and is not\nof legitimate concern to the public.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/cad.pdf", "filename": "cad.pdf", "size_mb": 0.21, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.948660", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the above listed\nen\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve status.\nFailure to file the necessary report by 02/28/2025 will result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or termina\u0000on of your\nregistra\u0000on.\nPlease verify the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email address and update as needed.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corps\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/delinquencyNoticeSecStateWa.pdf", "filename": "delinquencyNoticeSecStateWa.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.479666", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "heriberto@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 3:43 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nTitus-\nI never got a call I figured you must be extremely busy.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 3:43 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nTitus-\nI never got a call I figured you must be extremely busy. Can we try to get a short call to go over this case this week\nplease? I am in seattle, same address. I guess you said you were not aware of that. I was told I could do video\nhearings until told otherwise. I will call the clerk and try to get it set up from my end, but please let me know asap if\nthere is anything I need to worry about, like being in the cross hairs of a pissed off judge for not driving over to\nwenatchee to attend this hearing. I was honestly told that provided I made one appearance, I would be allowed to do\nvideo court until otherwise stated. I have limited funds and transportation due to the state of damages the tow\ncompany caused on my vehicle while driving it (yes they actually did not TOW my vehicle, they drove it without\nauthorization after I explicitly instructed dispatch as well as Jeremiah that nobody was to touch my vehicle without\nauthorization or without me there.)\nAnyhow, I appreciate your help man. Sorry if I sound frantic but this is a serious thing for a guy like me. And I was\nabsolutely screwed and setup to lock heads by a crooked dispatch center and some unscrupulous folks in the canyon\nthere. I would like to know what my way out is and if I agree to not press charges or sue anyone if they will drop their\nbogus alligation. Not a snowball chance in hell I committed ANY crime, and the trail of really brazen and idiotic actions\non their part is going to be pretty obvious even if they all wear badges and call themselves saints and heros or\nwhatever. Im sorry but these folks went to great lengths to STEAL from me and then they imprisoned the very person\nwhom I was calling for medical aid for. This wasnt about a tow dispute. It was never about that. They tried to make a\nbuck on that and I stepped around that and asked for my friend; who was being held in their garage. The actual\nthreats were made to me, by the female as well as Jeremiah. The tow truck driver had tried to get me to pay \"1,000\ncash\" and I eventually said \"you were never authorized to do anything to my vehicle. You have no legal right to just\ntake someones vehicle and perform a mock repair service then demand money or threaten to keep it. We can sort this\nout with a judge but I need my friend so we can leave\". Tow driver spit and swore and called me names trying to start\na fight. He turned to Jeremiah the homeowner and threw my keys to him and said \"I dont want nothing to do with this\npiece of shit\". I waited and stared at Jeremiah, who had some back and forth with tow operator who held his ground\nand persisted that he wanted nothing to do with my truck. I smiled and said \"now give me my keys so we can leave,\nplease\". Jeremiah was outraged and said exactly \"you aint getting your truck back.\" I said \"maybe not today, but we\ncan deal with that later then. So youre not giving me my truck back?\" Jeremiah simply answered \"fuck you. We tried to\nhelp you\". I said \"no, you tried to scam me. Thank god Im not stupid and know some law. Me and my friend will leave\non foot. I'm confident Ill be compensated nicely for my vehicle should it be damaged or disappear between now and\nthe time we get to state patrol where we are going for help.\". Jeremiah said \"you arent going anywhere.\" I said \"yes I\nam. And my friend is too.\" Jeremiah said \"shes with us, she is not leaving\". I asked to speak to her and they said no.\nAt this point I am starting to think things are so far from the normal peramiter, and well into serious felony conduct\nby city workers.... this is a recipe for me to end up dead. I was unable to call for help. I made 3 additional 911 calls\nwhich were all fielded by the same female dispatcher. I asked to speak with state patrol and she said she could not\npatch me through. She said she isnt an operator. I stated that I am facing a situation where I believe me and\nespecially my sick friend who needed aid, were facing loss of life if a nuetral third party leo cannot be brought on the\nline. Dispatch hung up on me. Jeremiah stated at about that time, that he had contacted his friend who is a Chelan\ndeputy. They were on the way. I asked for what? He said you threatened to shoot the place up. I laughed i thought he\nwas joking. Not something I would say. Not to mention I am not even mad at all throughout all of this. They were\nfuming pissed, not me.\nYou see; I made a standard call for emergency medical attention for a 60 year old type 2 diabetic who was going\ninto insulin shock. They instead drove us outside of cell service, seperated us then tried to extort me with my vehicle\nafter they STOLE it from where I parked it.\nFurther, Jeremiah's wife, who is also a dispatcher at Riverside EMS center with Jeremiah; she was the nastiest of\nthis group. All exhibited some seriously shady conduct but it is my observation thatboth Jeremiah as well as the tow\noperators; were pushed into this incident reluctently, by the female spouse, homeowner. She chastised tow operator\nwhen he relinquished my vehicle. She also had to repeatedly prod Jeremiah to follow thru. At the beginning of it as we\nsat in his garage thinking they were helping us.... she turned mean without reason; and left the room to yell at\n1 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nJermeiah. He came back with a change of clothes, he had donned fire fighter gear.... and she scolded him yet again\nand he went once more inside the house, this time he came out with a Wenatchee city shirt and hat on. And then the\nneighbor drove over to jeremiahs right next door, driving a red hummer which I recognize as a parade truck....and he\nhad the light bar on the entire time. I got video of that.\nThen the tow truck showed up and they were in a newer International roll back style tow truck, bright red color\ntruck; with signage which said \"BCR Towing, Cashmere\" or some 3 letter name I think, I need to check the pics for\nthat though. It definately was not Mountain Towing thiugh, seems like that discrepency in the police report should\nmatter though...\nAnyhow.... on the TOW TRUCK was a SxS ATV... great big thing like polaris RZr or something. A man was driving\nmy truck behind the tow truck as he pulled in. Jeremiah instructed me to go back in the garage but I came back out\nquickly and seen the tow truck was offloading the atv and the red parade HUMMER was now positioned sideways sort\nof blocking me...I told jeremiah that I never authoried any of this and I will pay for the help, but just like I told dispathc\non the intial call; I DONT HAVE MUCH MONEY.\nTow driver orders me to his truck and he sat inside and wouldnt make eye contact with me, I knew what was next. I\nasked \"how did you get my truck? He said \"we found the keys to it inside nd we bought a new tire and wheel for it.\nThen he said \"You owe me 1,000 dollars.\" CASH ONLY. I inspected the wheel and tire they provided. It was off of\nanother ford suv likely. The wheel was much smaller and a lot different. The tire was dry rotted. To make matters\nworse they drove my vehicle with one of the other tires completely flat also, destroying nother wheel nd tire.\nEventually when I was in jail, they simply handed the keys over to my friend and said head out. She broke down with\ntwo flats on snoqualmie pass. Luckilu. Upon being delivered to seattle by tow truck, the wheels they slapped on (mine)\nwere not even hand tightened, Lugs were missing. The clutch was completely shot and worse yet, the transmission\nhad catastrophic problem now too requiring a new transmission, all documented by tow and certified transmission\nshop.\nThese people prayed on me.These people endangered my friend multiple times in many ways. These people likely\nplotted to kill mewhen they realized they were not going to have an easy time with me as a target or mark for their\npathetic and SHAMEFUL scam.\nAs much as I want to move on; here we sit with this absurd case of a bunch of idiot hicks who tried to pull a shameful\nscam on stranded motorist amidst a medical emergency\nNO AMBULANCE WAS EVER CALLED\nNO EMT EVER TRIAGED MY FRIEND\nI imagine they will slice and dice this ten ways from sunday and try to totally bury me.... Im not mad though...honestly\nBecause I know I am not a vile POS who prayed on two disabled people who were calling for medical help after being\ntricked into a detour which LIKELY was carefully layed out by the same scumbags.\nJeremiah tried to have me killed by the arresting officer. And they were likely about to do it when I spasmed and\ncollapsed due to the severe agony and dehydration caused by frantially digging and pushing my truck out of 20+ miles\nof destert hard pan and shale rock, on a bare steel wheel under 90+ degree heat with no water and my trucks heat is\non full blast always and has been for years.\nThis isnt something I want to persue but you have some very very sick people who fucked up bad. I am pretty sure the\ncourts and all else must be complicit since the raw merits and evidence of this entire case point straight to my defense\nand its pretty obvious what has gone on out there. The fact this is dragging out to a court trial against ME is another\ncriminal matter entirely in and of itself. Seems the judge might not have seen much of this case yet or he would\nquickly throw it out. Because there enough evidence to criminally charge about a half dozen Cheland court personnel\nwho were present.\nI just want to move on. Not looking to sue anyone. Not looking for payback. This is a painful reminder that the\nauthorities are not our friends as citizens. And also scumbags will often call themselves \"good samaritans\" while\nextorting people. Eben while they are in need of emergency medical attention.\n-Ryan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:35 AM Beto Martinez wrote:\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_titus_noshow-phoneMeeting-sep22-2024.pdf", "filename": "email_titus_noshow-phoneMeeting-sep22-2024.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.548655", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Ryan Hell", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...", "body": "Gmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nDEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE AND DEFENSE REQUESTED\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 6:56 PM\nTo: Ryan Hell , Jacika Akter \nIT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION,\nby way of recent revelations, discovery of persons. and provided documents (I.E. archives and history), that there are\nmultiple STATE AND CITY court officials who are definitively classifiable as \"bad actors\u201d.\nThese bad actors were criminally engaged in some type of nefarious , and ILLEGAL activity in order to :\n1. circumvent justice,\n2. inhibit free speech and,\n3. manipulate election outcomes. t\nNamely, they kidnapped and extorted me for no reason of my own.\nThey later fabricated an allegation portraying themselves as good samaritans attacked by myself alleged to have\nmade some sort of verbal threats.\nThe act of kidnapping was present based on theelement of duress by myself and my aging, disabled, diabetic\npassenger whom they separated me from and denied either party contact... for whom I called begging for ambulatory\nservices after a harrowing 2 day ordeal attempting to get our vehicle out of a canyon after having two suspiciously\ncaused flat tires.\nWe desperately depended on THE EMS 911 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ATTENTION AND THEY USED THAT premise\nas an opportunity to FORCE us into their PERSONAL vehicle and to their RESIDENCE. This residence was outside of\ncell service and away from the hospitals.. and we never did get ANY sort of medical attention for my passenger.\nUltimately they eventually sent her in my truck over to Seattle, after handing her the keys to my truck. The truck broke\ndown half way and had to be towed and required an expensive TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT.\nIn fact the merits of this case will support evidence that these officials were attempting to commit something akin to\nwitness elimination.\nAdditionally, although more fit for the jury to interpret, perhaps; the tow driver UNLAWFULLY moved my vehicle by\ndriving it. I gave explicit directions to dispatch as well as the homeowners / off duty dispatchers that NOBODY is to\ntouch my vehicle without my presence.\nAs if the classic hisar robbery scheme is not clear enough; TOW TRUCK OPERATOR who had been\nDEMANDING my vehicle or \u201c1,000 dollars in US CASH BILLS ONLY\u201d; had surrendered my keys to the OFF DUTY\ndispatcher / homeowner after I carefully and calmly reminded him that he is required under statute to gain MY\nauthorization to touch that vehicle and has now stolen it, This seemed to stop his persuit, and after some abusive\nname calling to me, and trying tp FALSELY identify himself as a good samaritan , he violently yelled at the\nhomeowner and threw my keys claiming he was no longer interested in the truck or me. As I turned to\nJermiah and politely asked for my keys, he said \u201cYou aint getting your truck punk\u201d. I realizes at this point I\nwas now a victim of robber as well, as physical force began to be thrown at me as Jeremiah was increasingly\nfrustrated as he seemed to be losing control of his accomplices and the planned scheme seemed to spiral. I\ndecided to focus om a foot escape with my passenger, and then contact a agency such as State Patrol\nintervene with this lawless contempt pf public trust.\nBACK STORY / MOTIVE BEHIND SALLY BAGSHAW STALKING AND ATTEMPTING TO MURDER ME:\nI have long been a Ed Murray opponent and one of the harshest social media broadcasters, whilst the next party I will\nhighlight has been publicly passionate about protecting and hiding the crimes committed by Ed Murray causing his\nvoluntary resignation. IN 2017, MY WIFE, A TENURED FEDERAL OFFICER WAS ROBBED AT GUNPOINT, in a\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:23 PM\nGmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ndaring and unusually brazen public crime committed in 2017 on Pacific Hiway. This happed shortly after Ihelped the\nSeattle Times identify posible locations of sealed records concerning sexual offenses\u2026EUGENE OREGON\u2026 which\nultimately yielded a swift discovery and rapid successive voluntary resignation by Murray soon after. Keep in mind one\nof his accuser mysteriously died just days prior to, of am alleged overdose.\nFurther, the incident most concerning, has involved a very carefully planned and executed plot to stage a fake murder\nsuicide, thus carry out a premeditated murder . I will present that evidence when called upon to do so.\nSOLVED: FLEEING ACCOMPLICE OF THE HOMEOWNERS\nThere was a female driving a red pickup who was frantically fleeing the scene there.. She yelled something to the\neffect of \u201cI don\u2019t want him to see me\u201d and the men yelled to her \u201cjust go! Hurry the cops are almost hear\u201d.\nNEAR FATAL FALSE ARREST WITHOUT JUSTIFIED USE OF FORCE\nThe arrest itself was extremely dramatic and it was clear to me they were called upon to MURDER ME, again, for\nwitness elimination. I can substantiate this at the very least, by way of highlighting the verbiage in the dialogue\nbetween dispatchers and homeowners. Arresting officers were personal acquaintances of Jeremiah according to\nJustin Titius, appointed counsel. This alone is extremely unsettling and I do thank the officers for their last minute\nhesitation after intiially contacting me violently and accusing me of possessing a firearm.\nAS ALWAYS I REMAINED CALM AND COOPERATIVE, COMPLYING WITH ALL DIRECTIVES.\nI was able to capture multiple photos and I have just nowdiscoverd that the woman was none other than Seattle CITY\nCouncil Woman, and former 8 year tenure under ( N Maleng) SENIOR prosecutor, and more\u2026..SALLY BAGSHAW.\nI have compiled a number of montages and presented them to federal analyst to assess and it has been universal\nconsensus that the woman fleeing the Wenatchee address of my ALLEGED crimes, was in fact, SALLY BAGSHAW.\nFURTHER:\nYour court stenographer, WAS ALSO PRESENT AND WAS INTRODUCED TO ME AS ONE OF THE\nDFEFENDENTS MOTHERS. I was shocked to come to court and see her uniquely unforgettable appearance and\nstartled to see her visibly become uneasy and attempt to hide her face as I simply sat in the court room. With not\ndoubt this woman. Is the defendants CLAIMED mother.\nI have tried multiple times to present this to two judges and JUSTIN TITUS, my counsel assigned, has urged me\nnot to due to the likelihood I would be arrested for contempt.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:23 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_decleration-RealizationofConspiracyFeb-5-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_decleration-RealizationofConspiracyFeb-5-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.959648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:44 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700751\nActive Call Nature ATL/ATC Type l Priority 3\nAddress X:-120.206876, Y:47.238104 City\nCalls Dupl Names w/Alrts Wants Prem Adr\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections\nComplainant\nNumber UTO\nLast UNABLE TO OBTAIN Fst Mid\nAddress DOB / /\nCity ST ZIP SSN - -\nPhone ( ) - Race Sex Prev Calls 99 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert\nContact\nContact RYAN HELL 070978 Telephone (267)777-2344\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received 9 911 Line Occurred between 13:13:28 07/04/24\nReceived By MCCURDY KALAH and 13:20:00 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 13:13:28 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06391 07/04/24 ATL/ATC *Initiating Call\nNM UTO / / UNABLE TO OBTAIN, *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n13:18:33 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP AND GIRLFRIEND WERE REROUTED ON GOOGLE MAPS THROUGH THE CLOCKUM BECAUSE OF A\nDETOUR. THEY ENDED UP GET A FLAT TIRE.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:44 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700751\nActive Call Nature ATL/ATC Type l Priority 3\nAddress X:-120.206876, Y:47.238104 City\nCalls Dupl Names w/Alrts Wants Prem Adr\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections\nComplainant\nNumber UTO\nLast UNABLE TO OBTAIN Fst Mid\nAddress DOB / /\nCity ST ZIP SSN - -\nPhone ( ) - Race Sex Prev Calls 99 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert\nContact\nContact RYAN HELL 070978 Telephone (267)777-2344\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received 9 911 Line Occurred between 13:13:28 07/04/24\nReceived By MCCURDY KALAH and 13:20:00 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 13:13:28 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06391 07/04/24 ATL/ATC *Initiating Call\nNM UTO / / UNABLE TO OBTAIN, *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n13:18:33 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP AND GIRLFRIEND WERE REROUTED ON GOOGLE MAPS THROUGH THE CLOCKUM BECAUSE OF A\nDETOUR. THEY ENDED UP GET A FLAT TIRE. THEY HAVE BEEN STRANDED SINCE 2300HRS\nLAST NIGHT. NO FOOD OR WATER. THEY'RE DEHYDRATED. RP FELT LIKE HE WAS GONNA HAVE\nA STROKE EARLIER BUT HE IS FEELING BETTER. GIRLFRIEND IS A DIABETIC AND DOESNT\nHAVE HER MEDS. RP HAD DRIVEN 20 MILES ON HIS RIM IN HIS BLK FORD F150 AND IS NOW\nSTUCK AND UNABLE TO GET OUT.\n13:19:08 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP WAS TX'D TO KITTITAS CO WHO WAS TOLD TO CALL RCOM\n13:19:22 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP IS UPSET AND SAID HE KEEPS GETTING TRANSFERRED PLACES AND HE'S WORRIED\nTHEY'RE GOING TO DIE\n13:27:06 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nPHONE IS AT 33 PERCENT BUT HE HAS A CHARGER. SAID HES GONNA TRY TO GET ON HIS\nBICYCLE AND RIDE IT INTO TOWN TO GET WATER FOR HIM AND HIS GIRLFRIEND. THEY ARE\nSO DEHYDRATED THEY CAN'T STAY THERE ANYMORE. THE GIRLFRIEND IS GOING TO STAY AT\nLOC WHILE HE RIDES THE BIKE.\n13:27:30 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nPER K16 DOES HE JUST NEED A TOW TRK? MY PHONE IS UNAVAILABLE DOWNLOADING\nANOTHER CASE\n13:28:47 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nYES TOW TRUCK\n13:28:53 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nNO AID NEEDED\n13:29:15 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nFEMALE IS DELIRIOUS AND POSSIBLY GETTING A HEAT STROKE. RP IS SCARED SHE IS\nGOING TO GO INTO DIABETIC SHOCK. BUT DOESN'T NEED AID YET.\n13:41:38 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nMTN HWY TOWING ENRT TO GET THEM. THEY WILL PUT TOGETHER A PLAN AND CALL RCOM\nBACK BUT THEY WILL GO GET THEM. THEY WERE PROVIDED DIRECTIONS. RCOM UPDATED THE\nRP AND THEY REQUESTED WE CALL MTN HWY TOWING AND ASK THEM TO BRING THEM WATER.\nWILL CALL MTN HWY TOWING BACK TO ASK.\n13:41:53 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\n2007 2WD SINGLE CAB FORD F150\n13:43:14 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nMTN HWY TOWING WILL BRING THEM WATER AND CANDY BAR\n13:59:37 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 UPDATED WILL GET HIS AID BAG AND HEAD THERE. WILL UPDATE VIA RADIO ON CCSO\nFREQ OR CALL RCOM W/ AN UPDATE.\n14:13:21 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 IS GOING TO THEIR LOC W/ ONG JUICE, WATER, AID BAG, ETC AND WILL BRING THEM\nTO HIS HOUSE. MTN HWY IS GETTING WHEELS AND TIRES TO RETRIEVE THE PICK UP AND\nBRING IT DOWN TO RC58'S HOUSE.\n14:20:12 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 REQ TO CALL RP BACK TO ADV OF 20 MINUTE ETA IN A BLU GMC PICK UP. CALLED\nTHE RP WHO ADVISED HE ALSO HAS 2 DOGS AND WANTED TO KNOW IF THEY COULD GO TOO.\nTRIED TO CALL RC58 WHO DIDN'T ANSWER.\n14:43:06 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 IS W/ THEM AND WILL LOAD THEM UP AND TAKE THEM BACK TO HIS HOUSE.\n14:44:25 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRC58 HAVE SUBJECTS AND TAKING THEM TO 7599 CLOCKUM\n16:15:17 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 NO MEDICAL ISSUES AND MTN HWY IS WORKING ON GETTING THE TRUCK OUT. RCOM CAN\nCLR THE CALL.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/24C06391.pdf", "filename": "24C06391.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.907660", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "justin@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are. Since it\u2019s clear to me that\nI am being denied equal justice I want to highlight some concerns and reasons followed by my desired outcomes or\nsolutions. I appreciate you taking the no one to read this.\nI haven\u2019t had any significant time to get acquainted with the cases evidence witnesses or discuss even preliminary high\nlevel defense strategies. This case stems back to July 4th so I think it should be obvious that it\u2019s bothering you\nsomehow to do so, and either way it\u2019s too serious for me to give you any more chances.\nWe have agreed to talk dozens of times and I have yet to really get a quality conversation with you to shape up the case\nfor trial, and hear we are already facing readiness.. again.\nI\u2019ve left multiple emails and text and calls; dozens trying to get b the court date confirmed and you would not reply\nback. What\u2019s stranger is the court clerks told me I could not obtain my court date info with no case number and they\nconstantly refer me to you. It\u2019s almost like I\u2019m being manipulated and gas lighted and it all feels very immature and\nchildish to say the least.\nToday\u2019s ordeal of being scolded about missing TEO dates when the date I had last noted was the 18th\u2026 this isn\u2019t my\nstyle. I do my homework. I\u2019m on time. I graduated Cum Laud in an accredited engineering school. Worked my through\nduel majors in info science. Slouch I am not. And don\u2019t like being mistreated and lied to.\nThis case is a wonderful mess and it very likely has some officials in Wenatchee and probably Seattle also; sweating.\nNot my intention but also not at all my fault, either.\nYou see I simply called for medical help for my disabled friend and we were told our only option was to get on a personal\ncar with strangers\u2026 and being the good hearted person of trusting faith who I am; I no was taken for a ride.. no pun\nintended.\nI surmise we were lucky n to escape alive and I have some key details which are illustrated by the \u201cvictims\u201d own\nstatement, photographs and probably the 911 call recordings which is another issue entirely.\nI\u2019ve demonstrated that there were nefarious bad actors in this event. People who targeted us before we even called for\nthe ambulance. Then I s things escalated there was an unknown person who was ushered out the back door and\ncoached to flee fast before the police arrived. This woman as it turns out, was\nSALLY BAGSHAW. Former senior prosecutor and city council in Seattle. Embattled representative who aggressively\nprotected Ed Murray even after his incredibly I disgusting history of pedophilia accusations made by African American\nFoster Children.\nThere seems to be a pattern here with these people.\nViolate public trust\nGas light victims\nPlay victim while doing horribly things\nAccuse the accusers of being the culprits\nWithout a doubt Sally Bagshaw will have to get real creative to explain what she was doing at that crummy ranch house\nand why she attempted to flee before police arrived.\nOne of the main reasons this case cannot proceed until I formally have a chance to obtain new counsel;\nThe court staff I pointed out our first day\u2026 superior court stenographer. She was actually involved in the rouse.\nThe merits of the case I feel, represent a clear case of kidnapping and extortion. We were told the only way my friend\nwouldn\u2019t die, is if we got into these folks car. Initially dispatch also lied and said we were going to be picked up by city\ncouncilman. Instead it was rather more dispatchers for the questionable Riverside.\nIn addition they interfered with a medical duress call.\nAnd most disturbing of all\nIn the reports and statements; they made multiple attempts to get me to leave alone. Without my passenger who\nneeded insulin.\nNo sense in claiming they had intended to help her because they never did get her medical attention. So that\u2019s not why.\nI believe the plan was to kill her then chase me down and kill me, then create a false report that I fled the scene after\nkilling g her. Or even worse yet, kill her then arrest me and blame me for the murder.\nOne thing surely though; she wasn\u2019t being held onto for ransom. Or conversation. Or humor. Or money.\nI know in my heart that the plan in Wenatchee called for death to at least one of us, and then incarceration or death to\nthe other (myself). That makes me incredibly sick and I\u2019ve been perplexed by the revelations this past uear in the things\nI\u2019ve discovered afoot around me.\nIt\u2019s sick! And I am not sitting down quietly, I have tactfully presented my findings to a variety of agencies and entities\nand my goal is I to eradicate these criminally corrupt city I people so no more innocent people are harmed.\nI am asking respectfullyfor two things:\n1:) your resignation from this case; and I presume you are released to hear that. I get it. No hard feelings.\n2:) formal request for change of venue due to excessive concerns of witnesses and personell with conflict of interest;\nA) stenographer\nB) Riverside dispatcher #1\nC) Riverside Dispatcher #2\nD) Riverside dispatcher #3\nThese people occupy N salaried positions within the very same courthouse as the halls of justice I am no expected to\npress my case before; and I think it\u2019s foolish to pretend there will be a fair trial of held in Chelan or Douglas.\nI\u2019d hope for some place like Olympia since we now have emerging evidence of a major political scandal amidst this case.\nI\u2019d request to be in the presence of a jury and court personnel who can ensure integrity with a jury trial which involves\nsophisticated deep state orientated bad actors and brazen corruption, disdain for justice, and a sort of grand\nmalfeasance which most mid sized communities are scared to approach.\nThe only Good Samaritan that day was myself.\nI will continue to comply with court directives and I won\u2019t miss any hearings but I have to have access to proper\nchannels in order to learn what my obligations are. I feel like I probably sound patronizing when I say things like that, but\nI can\u2019t see any other way to express that without having access to a lawyer or being told n when new court dates are\nscheduled; I can\u2019t see how I am expected to show up.\nFurther; it\u2019s my understanding the original al court date was on the 5th. I missed that not knowing so they scheduled me\na new court date for today. How am I supposed to know that?\nThe gist I of it all feels like I\u2019m being toyed with by a judge that has some sort of childish vendetta for me. Which is\npretty sad since I have no prior experience with any of you. And if my free speach offended you this much, you folks\npicked the wrong profession. Because this country and our bygone laws as well as our spirit moving forward; are\nfounded firmly around this Nations unrivaled no holds barred FREEDOM OF SPEACH.\nI\u2019m not sure where you learned but I have no doubt t you must have studied more law then I have; but one of my\nmost formative experiences was a Jewish Holocaust survivor I had for a teacher in grade school; and she spent an entire\nweek covering the topic at that time in the 1980\u2019s, about Skinheads and the Aryann Nation, the KKK etc. As kids we\ncouldn\u2019t believe it was tolerated. \u201cSurely it\u2019s illegal!\u201d. No, it\u2019s not. She explained. She went on to quote and provide\nexamples illustrating how the country can only hold up free speech rights by protecting the most hated speech first.\nAnd she taught us that she doesn\u2019t care for it but she doesn\u2019t have to. And it\u2019s not her life she doesn\u2019t have to live that\nway. They do. It doesn\u2019t bother her.\nI\u2019m no right winger. Not racist. I do have concerns about pedophiles grooming school kids. I do have concerns with\nphony liberals and vocalize them. But that\u2019s because I was raised in an established democratic family and felt they failed\nto do the right thing g too many times. And to be honest it was just this sort of dishonest conduct.\nFor the level of contempt one of two things is occurring. You all are spending too much time n on my social media where\nI\u2019ve been bound to whole undergoing this trial. Or you have a particularly right wing mind set, regardless of party\nidentify. We are all fluid social animals. Don\u2019t get hu g up on my personal life of acting a fool online to pass time etc.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case.pdf", "filename": "email_Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.193651", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nChecksum 4948024b8b2aac96c5e06a7d077592b0\nFilename AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_2729470\n9-2.mp4\nFilesize 605 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 Base Media v1 [IS0 14496-12:2003]\nMinorversion 0.2.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 iso2\n2 avc1\n3 mp41\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nModifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTimescale 1000\nDuration 1:13:18\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 1/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nPreviewduration 0 s\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTrackmodifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 1:13:18\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 704\nImageheight 480\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 704\nSourceimageheight 480\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nVideoframerate 14.985\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nMediamodifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 2/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nMediatimescale 24000\nMediaduration 1:13:18\nMedialanguagecode und\nHandlerdescription SoundHandler\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 24000\nHandlertype Metadata\nHandlervendorid Apple\nEncoder Lavf56.40.100\nMediadatasize 601756659\nMediadataoffset 3104114\nImagesize 704x480\nMegapixels 0.338\nAvgbitrate 1.09 Mbps\nRotation 0\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 3/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 704\nHeight 480\nCoded Width 704\nCoded Height 480\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 50\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 15000/1001\nAvg Frame Rate 484434143/32327541\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 395857007\nDuration 4398.411189\nBit Rate 999808\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 65911\nExtradata Size 105\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 4/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nLanguage und\nHandler Name VideoHandler\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 5/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 24000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nTime Base 1/24000\nStart Pts 864\nStart Time 0.036\nDuration Ts 105563510\nDuration 4398.479583\nBit Rate 94688\nNb Frames 103090\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 6/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nLanguage und\nHandler Name SoundHandler\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 4398.515583\nSize 604860773\nBit Rate 1100118\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand isom\nMinor Version 512\nCompatible Brands isomiso2avc1mp41\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 7/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nEncoder Lavf56.40.100\nRaw Header 00 00 00 20 66 74 79 70 69 73 6F 6D 00 00 02\n00 69 73 6F 6D 69 73 6F 32 61 76 63 31 6D 70\n34 31 00 2F 5D 42 6D 6F 6F 76 00 00 00 6C 6D\n76 68 64 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n00 00 03 E8 00 43 1D 90 00 01 00 00 01 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 8/8\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27294709-2.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27294709-2.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.26, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:23.093674", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important", "summary": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_RE-__External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "email_RE-__External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.07, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.920648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nChecksum 5491a833bacfdeaed408f4861984e0f6\nFilename 20240704_173916.mp4\nFilesize 107 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 v2 [ISO 14496-14]\nMinorversion 0.0.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 mp42\nMediadatasize 107010106\nMediadataoffset 40\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nModifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTimescale 10000\nDuration 0:00:50\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nPreviewduration 0 s\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 1/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nPlaymode SEQ_PLAY\nAuthor Samsung SM-A426U\nAndroidversion 13\nAndroidcapturefps 30\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackmodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 0:00:50\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 1920\nImageheight 1080\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 1920\nSourceimageheight 1080\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nColorprofiles nclx\nColorprimaries BT.709\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 2/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTransfercharacteristics BT.709\nMatrixcoefficients BT.709\nVideoframerate 30.119\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediamodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediatimescale 48000\nMediaduration 0:00:50\nHandlertype Audio Track\nHandlerdescription SoundHandle\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 48000\nImagesize 1920x1080\nMegapixels 2.1\nAvgbitrate 17.3 Mbps\nRotation 90\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 3/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 1920\nHeight 1080\nCoded Width 1920\nCoded Height 1080\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 40\nColor Range tv\nColor Space bt709\nColor Transfer bt709\nColor Primaries bt709\nChroma Location left\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 30/1\nAvg Frame Rate 7465000/247849\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 4461282\nDuration 49.5698\nBit Rate 17014702\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 4/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 1493\nExtradata Size 35\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name VideoHandle\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 5/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nSide Data List\n0\nSide Data Type Display Matrix\nDisplaymatrix 00000000: 0\n65536 0\n00000001: -65536\n0 0\n00000002: 0\n0 1073741824\nRotation -90\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 48000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 6/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTime Base 1/48000\nStart Pts 3048\nStart Time 0.0635\nDuration Ts 2374619\nDuration 49.471229\nBit Rate 256015\nNb Frames 2319\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 7/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name SoundHandle\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 49.5698\nSize 107034115\nBit Rate 17274084\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand mp42\nMinor Version 0\nCompatible Brands isommp42\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.000000Z\nCom.android.version 13\nCom.android.capture.fps 30\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 8/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nRaw Header 00 00 00 18 66 74 79 70 6D 70 34 32 00 00\n00 00 69 73 6F 6D 6D 70 34 32 00 00 00 01\n6D 64 61 74 00 00 00 00 06 60 D8 4A 21 11\n45 00 14 50 01 46 FF F1 0A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 9/9\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.27, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.091662", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed\nto me but the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong\ndoing and expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls\ncontrary to the claim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position\nthat you did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this\ninformation. Tampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts\n(although this would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting\nare crimes. There are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and\nhave no ability to charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who\ncan charge a felony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on\nprosecutors and governments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy,\nevidence. Certainly, despite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set\npeople up. I just do not see that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several\npoeple, typically police, working outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not\ngenerally a multi-agency coverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple\npolice, a person or persons who can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data\nthere, and the tow truck company. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and\nfreedom (as these would all be clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I\nreally just do not see that happening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms\nof evidence, they did not bother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial\nregarding the alleged threats themselves will have to come from their testimony.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah\nworked for rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I\nspoke to had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged\nher and she persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID\nFOR. How many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor\nabsolute Brady related potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of\nthe emergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and\nsome symptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so\nbadly I had to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of\nitself which will be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on\nour experience together, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me\nparanoid and claiming I was trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright\nlie and you are absolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and\nI proactively dismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t\njudge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania\njersey Maryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life\nlessons with small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being\nbuddies with a sheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down\nmultimillion dollar jobs because I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the\ngrandma who was their clerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the\ndoubt that I\u2019m not your average udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it\ncompletely refusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some\nwacky conspiracy concern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell\nservice and were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and\ndrive us to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the\nhospital. I asked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then\nsaying an ambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This\nlie was a trick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too\nfar to go for help. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no\ntow. There was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road\nwith two flats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you\nguys keep mentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off\nthat same night with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to\nthe dispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The\ntire was flat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and\nthe wheel before getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes\na ton of these.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because\nthere\u2019s everyone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated\nimpound bill dispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that\nclarified also and on the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the\nai generated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all\nof which was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back\nmachine internet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam\nall sorts of red tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of\nproving my innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the\nred Tacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them\napproaching at a pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the\ndisagrees called in on me so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of\nraising my hands and calmly indicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was\nout of the view of their dash cams and they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to\nshoot and even falsely claiming I was holding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again;\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nall I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s life. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed\nand never asked for. I was beaten threatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold\nblood by co-conspirators. Because their force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in\nconjunction with the bad actors who originated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of\ndoze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of your portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect\nlocation of arrest can be used to alter the timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the\nleast, needed to get near any bridge. And the implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues\nwhich I am exhaustively trying to outline as exculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself.\nAnyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor altercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical\nlocation of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain\nof evidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026\nand the father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s\na horrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence,\nassigning ineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his\nluck BUT NOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only\nimagine what might have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we\nwere kidnapped and denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They\ntried to extort me for unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my\ntruck presumably for a abandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is\nfalse, especially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one\nbut you is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and\nthey kept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely\nskeptical and think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some\ntime to think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that\nyou didn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring\nlight to the to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nof the employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to\npress that we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s\nfor two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY\nCREATED HER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all\nalong. I showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded\nby either Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.660669", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=\u2026=msg-f:1831672489715170539&simpl=msg-f:1831672489715170539&mb=1 Page 1 of 5", "summary": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.679669", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to\njustice for her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been\nrushed to critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a\ncoalition of grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me,\nand that this is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my\nown civil rights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne 2.pdf", "filename": "email_BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne 2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.589643", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "heriberto@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:41 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nJustin\nI\u2019m frustrated about the potential loss of exculpatory evidence in my case.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:41 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nJustin\nI\u2019m frustrated about the potential loss of exculpatory evidence in my case. This incident happened back in July 4th and\nI still have not heard from anyone regarding the 911 call logs.\nI think the dispatch call logs are very fragile since the alleged victims in this case are actual dispatchers and the\ncase involves at least three dispatchers from the same dispatch call center (riverside).\nI have not had a chance to talk to you regarding this incident and I am bound by a court order to not contact said\nwitnesses so thereby I am prohibited from obtaining these records myself.\nI am contacting the regional FBI office as well as state patrol today to attempt to create an incident report and\nexpress my grave concern that justice is being denied to me and exculpatory evidence is intentionally being scuttled\nby the city of Chelan.\nThe 911 call very clearly was an emergency call to get ambulatory care for my passenger who is a 60 year old diabetic\nand was going into insulin shock due to extreme conditions and not having her insulin for two days in extreme heat\nwithout food or water. They were very clearly told numerous times that I was not asking for mechanical help of any\nsort and I would deal with my vehicle myself.\nThis is absolutely the most absurd and rediculous case I am aware of. It\u2019s ludicrous it\u2019s being charged and it\u2019s\nextremely disturbing that nobody is talking to me about my case and I have yet to obtain legal defense who will\nacquire the absolutely critical and exculpatory 911 recordings.\nAgain, given that these alleged victims are all dispatchers at the very center my call was made to: it\u2019s critical to obtain\nthese call logs and recordings asap.\nPlease let me know what the situation is. I can\u2019t help but think that this is collusion. The judge should have been able\nto see this case was a complete farce and they were absolutely criminal for kidnapping holding hostage then extorting\nme.\nYou guys need to realize that this isn\u2019t some joke to me and I need some answers. I won\u2019t sit on my hands while you\nfolks disappear my 911 call recordings. I will be as proactive as possible and contact everyone I can.\nIf you cannot find the time to do it then please schedule me a hearing so I can request permission to obtain them\nmyself.\nThank you Justin. If you are truly swamped I get that, and I am sorry and didn\u2019t mean to come across as angry. I\u2019m\njust facing a lot of time for a crime I never committed, three felonies.\nI haven\u2019t had so much as even a speeding ticket or late library book since 2002.I put myself thru accredited university,\nstarted three llc\u2019s one of which was in Wenatchee (Apple Valley Pc), I have pushed hard to stay on my own two feet\nafter divorce and homelessness in nyc where I was during Covid. I worked my way across the country to come home\nto be with my 98 year old grandmother who is in last years. This is robbing me of that.\nI did nothing wrong. These scumbags were not good Samaritans. They were bandits who laid a booby trap on public\nland then denied a sick woman emergency medical care and berated the man who called her help, and attempted to\nextort money. They destroyed my vehicle which I have had for almost a decade and driven all over this country to\nwork, move my wife and I, and also to volunteer which I can substantiate a lot of free voluntary trips to work with a\nvariety of agencies.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:19 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThis incident absolutely DISGUST ME. It has me ready to puke. I am outraged that bc the city of Wenatchee is\nengaging in a cover up of this magnitude, for some toothless creeps. Predators is what they are. I\u2019ll be waiting for a\nreply. Thank you for your time\nRyan Hell\nOn Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:35 AM Beto Martinez wrote:\nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:19 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_WarnedOfExculp-911AudioTitusSep-25-24.pdf", "filename": "email_WarnedOfExculp-911AudioTitusSep-25-24.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.902647", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_24C06401.pdf", "filename": "email_24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.491642", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\n3 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\n4 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me\nfor unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or endorse\nthem. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false, especially\ncitations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their property.\nI am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat to get a\ngun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated the\nthreat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this seems\nlike a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since the\nalleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make that\nthey get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "filename": "SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.15, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.700669", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy Sean,", "summary": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion!", "body": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion! Brilliant idea, counsel\u2019!\nHere is some further clarification regarding the relevance of Protocol 33, as cited in my prior correspondence, and to\naddress your request for the source of this protocol. This information directly supports my motion to preserve\nevidence, as it establishes that RiverCom 911\u2019s handling of my 911 call violated mandatory emergency medical\ndispatch protocols, potentially constituting evidence tampering or negligence relevant to my case. Below, I outline the\nregulatory framework, RiverCom\u2019s adherence to these protocols, and their implications.\n1. Overview of Protocol 33 in Emergency Medical Dispatch Protocol 33 is a component of the Medical Priority\nDispatch System (MPDS), a standardized protocol used by 911 dispatch centers to triage and respond to medical\nemergency calls. Specifically, Protocol 33 addresses urgent medical emergencies, including inter-facility transfers and\nconditions such as suspected strokes or severe diabetic crises. It requires dispatchers to:\n\u2022 Classify the call based on reported symptoms.\n\u2022 Dispatch appropriate emergency medical services (EMS), such as paramedics.\n\u2022 Maintain the call\u2019s priority level unless a qualified medical professional (e.g., paramedic or physician) provides\ndocumented clearance.\nIn my case, the 911 call reported a potential stroke and a passenger with Type 1 diabetes who had not received\ninsulin, food, or water for two days\u2014both qualifying as medical emergencies under Protocol 33. The dispatcher\u2019s\nreduction of this call to a \u201croadside call\u201d without triage, medical assessment, or clearance violates these standards.\n2. RiverCom 911\u2019s Adherence to MPDS and Protocol 33 RiverCom 911, which serves Chelan and Douglas Counties,\nexplicitly utilizes the MPDS, including Protocol 33, as part of its dispatch operations. This is documented on\nRiverCom\u2019s official resources and training materials, accessible via their website (www.rivercom911.org). Specifically:\n\u2022 RiverCom\u2019s \u201cAbout Us\u201d and \u201cServices\u201d sections confirm that their dispatchers are trained and certified in MPDS\nprotocols to ensure compliance with national and state standards for emergency response.\n\u2022 RiverCom 911 Training Manual (referenced in their training materials) mandates the use of MPDS for all medical\nemergency calls, aligning with industry best practices for 911 operations.\nThis establishes that RiverCom is bound by Protocol 33\u2019s requirements when handling medical emergency calls, such\nas mine.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\n3. Washington State\u2019s Regulatory Authority Washington State further mandates compliance with MPDS protocols,\nincluding Protocol 33, through its regulatory framework for emergency medical services:\n\u2022 WAC 246-976-001 and WAC 246-976-182: These regulations, under the Washington Administrative Code, govern\nemergency medical services and require 911 dispatch centers to adhere to standardized protocols, protocols like\nMPDS to ensure proper EMS response to medical emergencies. WAC 246-976-182 specifically mandates that\ndispatchers dispatchers align EMS response with the reported severity of the call\u2019s severity.\n\u2022 RCW 70.168: This statute establishes the state\u2019s emergency medical Services and trauma care system, system\nrequiring coordinated dispatch responses to medical emergencies, emergencies consistent with protocols like MPDS.\nThese laws obligate RiverCom to follow Protocol 33, ensuring that medical emergencies are not improperly\ndowngraded without proper medical justification.\n4. Relevance to My Motion and Brady Implications The dispatcher\u2019s failure to follow Protocol 33 in my case\u2014\ndowngrading a medical emergency without triage or clearance\u2014raises concerns about evidence integrity, as the CAD\nfile reflects this improper action. This is directly relevant to my motion to preserve evidence, including CAD files,\ndispatch logs, radio communications, and metadata, to investigate potential tampering or negligence. Under Brady v.\nMaryland (373 U.S. 83 (1963)), the prosecution is obligated to disclose exculpatory evidence, including evidence of\nprocedural violations or tampering that could undermine the credibility of the state\u2019s case. The violation of Protocol 33\nconstitutes such evidence, as it suggests mishandling of my 911 call that could have impacted the incident\u2019s outcome.\n5. Request for Action Given the above, I respectfully request that you:\n\u2022 Incorporate this information into our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to my motion to preserve evidence.\n\u2022 Emphasize the Brady implications of RiverCom\u2019s protocol violation.\n\u2022 Pursue forensic analysis of the CAD file and related evidence to determine if tampering occurred, as the date\ndiscrepancy (May 27, 2025) remains unresolved despite your ambiguous / vague explanation citing \u201cin the range of\nwhen you requested it\u201d.\nPlease confirm receipt of this email and advise on next steps. If you require additional documentation or legal\ncitations, I am happy to assist in providing them.\nI\u2019m not a lawyer and I never attended law school or graduated a legal or social program. But I am capable of utilizing a\nnetwork of resources to provide help occasionally and I don\u2019t mind helping you with portions of the job which your\nAlma mater left out of corricul. Holefully someday this knowledge comes into play for one of your dui clients who you\ndefend.\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\nSincerely,\nRyan Hell\n267-777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:44 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n(1) Whether to pursue a plea deal or not is your call.\n(2) I'll file a short response today.\n(3) Where does this information about protocol 33 come from?\n(4) The 5/27/25 date corresponds to the time frame that I submitted the public records request to\nobtain the CAD log. This is consistent with other public records requests that I have made.\nThey have a portal here: https://rivercom911.org/public-records/\nPublic Records - RiverCom 911\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nHow RiverCom Responds to a Request for Public Records RiverCom will acknowledge a request for public\nrecords within five (5) business days of receiving the request, by one of the following: Provide the record\nAcknowledge the receipt of the request and provide a reasonable estimate of time to respond to and/or\ncomplete the request Request clarification of the record request\nrivercom911.org\n(5) I have also requested information on the license plate you have requested which you believe is\nSally Bagshaw.\n(6) I'll just give you the bottom line so you can decide if you want to ask for a new attorney on Monday\nor what.\nI think the odds this situation was orchestrated by some former disgraced Seattle employee and/or\nsome former city attorney is probably close to zero. I do not really engage or follow in conspiratorial\ncommunities or thinking and I am just looking at this for what it appears to be.\nIt seems more likely that you did get stuck in a remote area you believed would cut through back to the\nroads, but it did not, and you were stranded in hot weather with a passenger who was having a\nmedical emergency. You then called 911 for help.\nWhether you did or did not ask for it, they sent a tow truck and an off-duty dispatcher, Jeremiah\nJohnson, to find the truck. Jeremiah Johnson took you and the passenger back to his house. At some\npoint, the tow truck people started asking you to pay them for the tow.\nThere was a dispute over whether you should pay them at all and also that you had previously\ndisclosed to them that you were homeless and did not have any money. Thus, they should not have\nexpected payment.\nIt is around this time that they are alleging that during this dispute, you made a statement which\nconveyed something to the effect of \"you will take a bullet before you take my truck\" although the\nstatements from them seem to have varying versions of this alleged threat.\nIt was at this point, the guy's wife started filming on her phone and that he called the police.\nThe argument continued (without any further threat allegations from you), the wife makes some\nstatements and her own threat towards you. The husband approaches you around this same time\nframe and gets pretty close to the point where you pull out what appears to be a knife and then put it\naway. Both he and you called the cops.\nThen the cops arrived, essentially just taking the other people at their word, and arrested you.\nI still do not believe at this point that you have identified any particular defense to the allegation except\nto \"change the narrative.\"\nIf this case proceeds to trial, a judge will determine what comes into evidence and what does not. A\njury will hear the evidence that the judge lets in. That jury will be provided with a packet of papers\ncalled jury instructions which will outline some legal principles. Several of these documents will pertain\nto what the crime of harassment is legally defined as. The only thing the jury is called on to do is do\ndecide if the State, through the prosecutor, has proven that you committed these crimes beyond a\nreasonable doubt.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nThe base WPIC is here (and cites to several other ones): https://govt.westlaw.com/wcrji/Document/\nI093c5d8ba75611dd8931e514b9d4bd12?viewType=FullText&originationContext=\nView Document - Washington Criminal Jury Instructions - Westlaw\nTitle of crime. For ease of reference, the committee has referred to this crime as \u201cfelony harassment.\u201d\nThe word \u201cfelony\u201d should not be included unless the jury is also being instructed on the gross\nmisdemeanor form of the crime, WPIC 36.07.\ngovt.westlaw.com\nThere is no possibility during this trial that anyone besides you gets convicted of anything. Anyone\ncharged would get their own separate trial if they were ever charged. The only potential outcomes are\nthat the jury finds you guilty, not guilty, or cannot make a decision and there is a hung jury or mis-trial,\nwhich leaves open the possibility of another trial.\nIf you are convicted, you will have the right to appeal.\nWhile certain things will be relevant towards the potential bias of law enforcement or the parties\ninvolved (that at least Johnson was a dispatcher), it will be the jury that decides who is credible, or not,\nfactoring that bias in.\nMost of the potential jury pool is going to be just ordinary people who live in Chelan County. While\nsome may enjoy conspiracies, it is unlikely that all, or even most, of them will. And my assumption\nwould be that most, if not all, will not. It is also likely the judge will limit the evidence presented at trial\nto things they deem relevant to the issue of guilt, based upon the rules of evidence, and is probably\nnot even going to allow any tin-foil hat sort of stuff, although that will be their call.\nUltimately, you will likely need to testify in this case (although you have the right not to), if you want to\npresent your side of the case to the jury. Most likely, they are going to want to know if you made the\nalleged statement or not. If you did, they will want to know if it was a serious threat. If you did not, they\nwill want to know why these people are making this up. I do not think they will buy some story about a\nconspiracy to set you up in the middle of nowhere in Malaga, Washington and shake you down for a\nthousand dollars.\nIf you did make the statement, there are still some potential defenses as the threat, if made, was\napparently conditional, only in defense of your property, and in the context of a relatively long\nargument.\nJeremiah Johnson tells the cop in the video at about 37:45 that he wasn't worried about \"stepping it\nup\" until the knife portion, which was after well after the alleged threat.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Friday, June 20, 2025 6:03 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File\nDiscrepancy\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy\nSean,\nI am writing to ensure our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to the motion to preserve forensic metadata and\nlogs, scheduled for hearing next week, clearly addresses two critical issues:\n- a likely violation of International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD)\nprotocols by the RiverCom 911 dispatcher\n- a suspicious date discrepancy in the provided CAD file.\nThese issues are directly relevant to my defense against the felony harassment charges (RCW 9A.36.046) and\nconstitute exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, as they could demonstrate evidence tampering and\nmisrepresentation of my intent during the July 4, 2024, incident.\nThe CAD file for my initial 911 call confirms I reported a medical emergency for my type 1 diabetic passenger, who\nwas in possible insulin shock, underscoring my urgent request for help. However, the dispatcher marked the call as\n\u201cnot medical\u201d at the end, falsely claiming I retracted the emergency by stating my passenger was fine\u2014a claim I\nadamantly deny.\nUnder IAED EMD guidelines, specifically Protocol 33 for diabetic emergencies, dispatchers must assign a\nhigh-priority code (e.g., Delta) and dispatch an ambulance unless there is clear, documented evidence of\nretraction or on-scene medical verification that no emergency exists.\nNo such evidence exists, as I consistently pleaded for an ambulance.\nThe dispatcher\u2019s reclassification without justification violates EMD protocols and suggests an attempt to\ndownplay the medical emergency, aligning with the prosecution\u2019s narrative that I threatened individuals\nover a (non-existent) tow bill dispute, as emphasized in the harassment CAD file (call number 240700787).\nThe dispatcher\u2019s conduct during the call was highly unprofessional and irregular.\nShe answered rudely, saying, \u201cWhat? What do you want?\u201d and initially garbled her identity, only clarifying it was\nRiverCom 911 after I pressed her.\nWhen I requested an ambulance, she refused, stating, \u201cIt\u2019s the 4th of July, honey, there are no ambulances,\u201d and\ninsisted a mechanic inspect my truck\u2019s flat tire as a condition for any help.\nI refused repairs or towing to avoid potential extortion but agreed to a visual inspection only to secure ambulatory\nassistance, stipulating no repair bills.\nHer prior knowledge of my truck\u2019s condition within seconds of my initial call; which I hadn\u2019t mentioned, and her\nrefusal to dispatch an ambulance without mechanic involvement are absent from the CAD file, indicating possible\nomission or editing.\nThese actions breach IAED EMD protocols, which prioritize medical response over unrelated conditions, and\nsupport my claim that the dispatcher\u2019s handling was targeted and prejudiced, possibly tied to broader evidence\nmanipulation in this case.\nThe CAD Master Call Table for the harassment call (240700787), visibly dated 05/27/25, raises further concerns.\nThis date, nearly a year after the incident on July 4, 2024, suggests the file may have been edited, exported, or\naltered before being provided in discovery.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nCAD systems log modifications with timestamps and user IDs, and a future date could indicate tampering to align\nwith the prosecution\u2019s narrative.\nMetadata analysis, as requested in our forensics motion, could confirm when and by whom this file was accessed or\nedited, directly challenging the integrity of the evidence used against me.\nThe dispatchers felony harassment CAD file also references a prior call (likely 24C06391) where my passenger and\nI were assisted but omits critical medical details, further suggesting selective reporting to frame me as aggressive\nrather than a person acting under duress to save a life.\nTo strengthen our defense, please include the following in the rebuttal:\n(1) Argue that the dispatcher\u2019s reclassification of my medical call as \u201cnot medical\u201d violates IAED EMD Protocol 33,\nlacking documented evidence of retraction, and request access to RiverCom\u2019s audit logs to verify the change\u2019s\nlegitimacy.\n(2) Highlight the 05/27/25 date discrepancy on the CAD file as evidence of potential tampering, necessitating\nmetadata analysis to confirm its modification history.\nThese points are exculpatory, as they could prove the prosecution\u2019s evidence was manipulated to misrepresent my\nactions, undermining the harassment charges.\nPlease confirm by email that this rebuttal has been filed by June 23, 2025.\nSincerely, Ryan :)", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.720669", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nChecksum 5491a833bacfdeaed408f4861984e0f6\nFilename 20240704_173916.mp4\nFilesize 107 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 v2 [ISO 14496-14]\nMinorversion 0.0.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 mp42\nMediadatasize 107010106\nMediadataoffset 40\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nModifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTimescale 10000\nDuration 0:00:50\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nPreviewduration 0 s\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 1/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nPlaymode SEQ_PLAY\nAuthor Samsung SM-A426U\nAndroidversion 13\nAndroidcapturefps 30\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackmodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 0:00:50\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 1920\nImageheight 1080\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 1920\nSourceimageheight 1080\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nColorprofiles nclx\nColorprimaries BT.709\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 2/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTransfercharacteristics BT.709\nMatrixcoefficients BT.709\nVideoframerate 30.119\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediamodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediatimescale 48000\nMediaduration 0:00:50\nHandlertype Audio Track\nHandlerdescription SoundHandle\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 48000\nImagesize 1920x1080\nMegapixels 2.1\nAvgbitrate 17.3 Mbps\nRotation 90\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 3/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 1920\nHeight 1080\nCoded Width 1920\nCoded Height 1080\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 40\nColor Range tv\nColor Space bt709\nColor Transfer bt709\nColor Primaries bt709\nChroma Location left\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 30/1\nAvg Frame Rate 7465000/247849\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 4461282\nDuration 49.5698\nBit Rate 17014702\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 4/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 1493\nExtradata Size 35\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name VideoHandle\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 5/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nSide Data List\n0\nSide Data Type Display Matrix\nDisplaymatrix 00000000: 0\n65536 0\n00000001: -65536\n0 0\n00000002: 0\n0 1073741824\nRotation -90\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 48000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 6/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTime Base 1/48000\nStart Pts 3048\nStart Time 0.0635\nDuration Ts 2374619\nDuration 49.471229\nBit Rate 256015\nNb Frames 2319\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 7/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name SoundHandle\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 49.5698\nSize 107034115\nBit Rate 17274084\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand mp42\nMinor Version 0\nCompatible Brands isommp42\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.000000Z\nCom.android.version 13\nCom.android.capture.fps 30\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 8/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nRaw Header 00 00 00 18 66 74 79 70 6D 70 34 32 00 00\n00 00 69 73 6F 6D 6D 70 34 32 00 00 00 01\n6D 64 61 74 00 00 00 00 06 60 D8 4A 21 11\n45 00 14 50 01 46 FF F1 0A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 9/9\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/MULTIPLEForensicsIndicationsofTampering20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "MULTIPLEForensicsIndicationsofTampering20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.27, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:23.113674", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nSally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:39 AM\nTo: ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov\nFor times sakes I\u2019ll paste in what I already sent a judicial overbite committee.", "body": "Gmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nSally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:39 AM\nTo: ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov\nFor times sakes I\u2019ll paste in what I already sent a judicial overbite committee. For be out beers a synopsis\nSally Bagshaw traveled to Wenatchee Wa to attempt to trap and execute Ryan Hell and his passenger during a 911 call for emergency aid.\nShe was ordered to flee as deputies arrived I got her on film. Arch nemesis regarding Ed Murray exposure. Do what\u2019s right, is my advice and request.\nAs of now I\u2019m being told they are trying to killlme in custody.\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.\nThis court and primarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial.\nI am presenting evidence of a conflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit murder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll\ncontinue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask you to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect everyone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk\nand murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of July for them.\nSecomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d\nThere was a woman at the seen who was introduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the Stenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to.\nLet\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get her formal name.\nMOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING\nA KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL PROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of become a political target OF;\nSALLY BAGSHAW\nHas direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What is more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by the alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before\nthe cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t mean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and the incidents here are only\nindicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy.\nJuly 4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service aside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her\nhelp is if we went in their pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000. I reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then\nsaid he was robbing me of my truck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill. Ryan was resigned for 3x fel threats.\nInitial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned.\nI have called emailed and texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at least 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State\nbar. I recorded one response with some preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a proper working email.\nI have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail and clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades.\nI have been proactive in obtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing court clerks for Chelan county.\nI have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had concerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did not reply. I\nmentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time earlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on 911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside\nassistance for the flat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and run my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products\nthroughout the state, for 7 years while attending university.\nThe tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I respect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after tactfully defending\nhimself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do me and likely her grave harm.\nSince I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I will present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court. Again I am unable\nto access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs by judge jourdan thru.\nIn 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth works and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events namely\nmolesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations had been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount\nof this eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful inventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he\nwas in fact every bit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and he moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle.\nAccusations came out and Murray denied them. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us who had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we\ncheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong will the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad.\nIn 2017 Delvonn Heckard that plaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot of us felt like it was murder.\nWe discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only said Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the case is sitting\narchives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I simply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray lies\nwent silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned.\nHow does this apply to our case?\nIn the incident, as I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were gonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed\nonsite. I then heard a woman frantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go now just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a\npicture of, knowing she was yet another piece of evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a career politician and political figure of highest order, from\nSeattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a senior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she had aggressively controlled and swayed the\ndiecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers presented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to keep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look\nat this detail\nA former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach, probably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed Murray and fighting fellow councilman to\nkeep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court records now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more VULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented\nthen the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a disgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally.\nI\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy creating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express stimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical\nway to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even mafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express our intended message.\nI try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between some things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out.\nEd Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my name tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by professional contractors. That\nFASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat unfortunately so I dug.\nIn 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work walking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She was\nrobbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They never caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d.\nWe moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019. I\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a desert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and\nphotos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we enjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had my own as well. I was seeing multiple\nvehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting visitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all. Absolutely compliant.\nIt\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my license plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it. Then\nSally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to try to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:27 PM\nGmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nresident and she is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since 2016.\nI didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a former SENIOR PROSECUTOR.\nI was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate for me, my passengers and my type of vehicle.\nI can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the way the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nwww.ryanhell.com\nSeattle Wa\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:27 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_BagshawFleeingScene-ReportedToOmbudsMan.pdf", "filename": "email_BagshawFleeingScene-ReportedToOmbudsMan.pdf", "size_mb": 2.86, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.498655", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell, Defendant\nChelan County Superior Court\nCase # 24-1-00253-04\nEXHIBIT A: METADATA PROOF (File: 20240704_173916.mp4)\nThis evidence directly supports the claims of Spoliation of Evidence and Advanced Digital\nTampering cited in the attached Motion.", "body": "Ryan Hell, Defendant\nChelan County Superior Court\nCase # 24-1-00253-04\nEXHIBIT A: METADATA PROOF (File: 20240704_173916.mp4)\nThis evidence directly supports the claims of Spoliation of Evidence and Advanced Digital\nTampering cited in the attached Motion.\n1. Concealment of Modification History (Identical Dates):\n\u25cf Createdate: 2024:07:05 00:40:06\n\u25cf Modifydate: 2024:07:05 00:40:06\n2. Evidence of Advanced Tampering/Rendering Tools:\n\u25cf Videoframerate: 30.119 (Non-standard rate indicating re-encoding)\n\u25cf Handler Name (Video Stream): VideoHandle (Component associated with 3D\nmanipulation software)\n\u25cf Handler Name (Audio Track): SoundHandle (Component associated with audio\nprocessing software)\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Exhinbit_A.pdf", "filename": "Exhinbit_A.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.139662", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are\nterrified of me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the\nloudest voice to share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my\nDUTY to not only make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/duplicate.pdf", "filename": "duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.749670", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed\nto me but the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong\ndoing and expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls\ncontrary to the claim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position\nthat you did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this\ninformation. Tampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts\n(although this would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting\nare crimes. There are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and\nhave no ability to charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who\ncan charge a felony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on\nprosecutors and governments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy,\nevidence. Certainly, despite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set\npeople up. I just do not see that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several\npoeple, typically police, working outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not\ngenerally a multi-agency coverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple\npolice, a person or persons who can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data\nthere, and the tow truck company. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and\nfreedom (as these would all be clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I\nreally just do not see that happening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms\nof evidence, they did not bother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial\nregarding the alleged threats themselves will have to come from their testimony.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah\nworked for rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I\nspoke to had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged\nher and she persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID\nFOR. How many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor\nabsolute Brady related potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of\nthe emergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and\nsome symptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so\nbadly I had to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of\nitself which will be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on\nour experience together, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me\nparanoid and claiming I was trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright\nlie and you are absolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and\nI proactively dismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t\njudge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania\njersey Maryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life\nlessons with small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being\nbuddies with a sheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down\nmultimillion dollar jobs because I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the\ngrandma who was their clerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the\ndoubt that I\u2019m not your average udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it\ncompletely refusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some\nwacky conspiracy concern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell\nservice and were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and\ndrive us to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the\nhospital. I asked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then\nsaying an ambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This\nlie was a trick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too\nfar to go for help. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no\ntow. There was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road\nwith two flats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you\nguys keep mentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off\nthat same night with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to\nthe dispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The\ntire was flat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and\nthe wheel before getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes\na ton of these.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because\nthere\u2019s everyone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated\nimpound bill dispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that\nclarified also and on the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the\nai generated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all\nof which was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back\nmachine internet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam\nall sorts of red tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of\nproving my innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the\nred Tacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them\napproaching at a pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the\ndisagrees called in on me so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of\nraising my hands and calmly indicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was\nout of the view of their dash cams and they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to\nshoot and even falsely claiming I was holding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again;\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nall I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s life. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed\nand never asked for. I was beaten threatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold\nblood by co-conspirators. Because their force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in\nconjunction with the bad actors who originated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of\ndoze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of your portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect\nlocation of arrest can be used to alter the timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the\nleast, needed to get near any bridge. And the implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues\nwhich I am exhaustively trying to outline as exculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself.\nAnyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor altercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical\nlocation of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain\nof evidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026\nand the father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s\na horrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence,\nassigning ineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his\nluck BUT NOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only\nimagine what might have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we\nwere kidnapped and denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They\ntried to extort me for unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my\ntruck presumably for a abandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is\nfalse, especially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one\nbut you is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and\nthey kept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely\nskeptical and think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some\ntime to think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that\nyou didn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring\nlight to the to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nof the employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to\npress that we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s\nfor two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY\nCREATED HER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all\nalong. I showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded\nby either Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.655644", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Good morning Brian. I am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.", "body": "Good morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for me to\nappear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to go\nover the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all councils\nassigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to cite\nformally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a year.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record, about\nthe urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD file\nthough and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the park.\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the time\nof alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she made\nto conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd rescue\nwith these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work the 911\ncenters They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know better than\nthat. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other common sense\nstuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering simple\ncritical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and \u201cwhy\ndidn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and federal\nrelief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail of sloppy\ncover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty attempt\nto cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and\nthere have been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel,\npresumably under some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom\n911. I\u2019ve been lied to on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse\nto consult for over 9 months. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his\noffice. When I arrived to watch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces\nof video that would put the prosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy\nscrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names\nthreatening to assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again\nand get them to intervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone and\nsay \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow\noperator said \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s\nfree to go by me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false\nbut entirely inflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty\nmaddening. Because I not only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed\nas they destroyed my transmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over\n2900 all said on that. And I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER\ninvestigations into Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then\nsettled lawsuit an ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king\ncounty medical examiners. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s\nevidence of needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to\nus.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were not\nallowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding irreversible\nirreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911 calls; and also I\nthink one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the spoilation of my voice\naudio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her to not let my passenger\ndie. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council member then Jeremiah shows\nup, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website. Look\naround the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made regarding\ndispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can\nmurder me but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can\nblock me away then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Re-_Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.939648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Also what is our next appearance for this motion. I have an appointment tomorrow but will check here to ensure I don\u2019t\nmiss it\nOn Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:34 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nOk, thanks for the update.", "body": "Also what is our next appearance for this motion. I have an appointment tomorrow but will check here to ensure I don\u2019t\nmiss it\nOn Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:34 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nOk, thanks for the update. Is there anything in these videos pf me making these alleged threats? I will watch them\nmyself now if possible but I would like the short answer:\nAs of last we talked there were no threats made by me in any of the videos you have watched. Can you confirm this\nis the situation still?\nAt any rate I\u2019d like to file the aforementioned Brady motion in response to the prosecutors rebuttal of my\npreservation motion. There are clear reasons why that is pertinent.\nThank you again\nRyannHell\nOn Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 1:10 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nHey Ryan,\nI double checked the Dropbox today and it looks three videos were not uploaded. I have uploaded\nthose, to include the front facing dash camera video, and two others that look like they were not\nuploaded. I also put up a public records request response about the first call which I have uploaded.\nIt does not include the call itself, just the CAD log.\nCourt is at 1:30.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, June 16, 2025 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: State's response to motion\nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the\nJudges Chambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME\nACCESS AND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me\nfor personal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he\ndistinctly says there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:38 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified\nthat any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are\nnot the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy\nall copies of the original message.\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:38 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_SeanEstworthyConfirmingNoThreatsByRyaninVidsAndPlanstoCoachWitnesses-June-18-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_SeanEstworthyConfirmingNoThreatsByRyaninVidsAndPlanstoCoachWitnesses-June-18-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.440654", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the en\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve\nstatus.\nIn accordance with RCW23.95.605-610, the above en\u0000ty is hereby administra\u0000vely dissolved as of: 03/03/2025.\nThis ac\u0000on was taken due to failure of the en\u0000ty to file a required report within the \u0000me set forth by law.\nUnder RCW 23.95.615, a domes\u0000c en\u0000ty that is administra\u0000vely dissolved may apply for reinstatement no later than five (5)\nyears a\u0000er the effec\u0000ve date of administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on noted above. RCW 23.95.615 iden\u0000fies the requirements for an\napplica\u0000on for reinstatement.\nYou can access the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) online to reac\u0000vate your\nen\u0000ty using the following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. This no\u0000ce is generated as part of\nan automated no\u0000fica\u0000on process.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/C3910175-449A-4D24-974B-CF59449049CA.pdf", "filename": "C3910175-449A-4D24-974B-CF59449049CA.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.499667", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: questions@wsba.org\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: questions@wsba.org\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to make\nit off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was not\ncarrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911 service).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to accompany\nthe male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator, and I\nneeded to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle has\nbeen done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as auto\ntheft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\n1 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\nGmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let us\ngo, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an unknown\nfemales voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The man yelled \u201cyou\nhave to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where he is?!\u201d And the\nman yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here trying\nto do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take capture that\nevidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming behaviors and\nconduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They performed a\nbizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front (dash cam I\npresume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm voice that I am non-\ncombative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and made repeated threats\nto shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a mere 20 feet away, broad\ndaylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one more\nword. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I am\ncomplying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said the\nnext time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as I\ncompiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard trying\nto dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and I\nslammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they claimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log) \u201che\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\nGmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ndoesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to let\nme know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to why\nthat delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in. I\npolitely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he wanted\nto part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to come\nview video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was floored by the\negregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on video. The video\nsupports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other than to put my hands\nip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing their\nclaim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_ethicsComplaintMail_WSBA-May-9-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_ethicsComplaintMail_WSBA-May-9-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.417654", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT AND\nINTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior Court on\nthe MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of local\njurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE,\nCHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING\nNUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY, JUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case\npresents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence named in this motion merely highlights the few details\nfor just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which in fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather;\na dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke desperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT AND\nINTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior Court on\nthe MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of local\njurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE,\nCHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING\nNUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY, JUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case\npresents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence named in this motion merely highlights the few details\nfor just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which in fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather;\na dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke desperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to justice\nfor her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been rushed\nto critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a coalition\nof grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me, and that\nthis is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my own civil\nrights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nimage.jpeg", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Re-_Motion_To_Dismiss_With_Prejudice_Due_to_OUTRAGEOUS_Government_Misconduct__an.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Motion_To_Dismiss_With_Prejudice_Due_to_OUTRAGEOUS_Government_Misconduct__an.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.693645", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "justin@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are. Since it\u2019s clear to me that\nI am being denied equal justice I want to highlight some concerns and reasons followed by my desired outcomes or\nsolutions. I appreciate you taking the no one to read this.\nI haven\u2019t had any significant time to get acquainted with the cases evidence witnesses or discuss even preliminary high\nlevel defense strategies. This case stems back to July 4th so I think it should be obvious that it\u2019s bothering you\nsomehow to do so, and either way it\u2019s too serious for me to give you any more chances.\nWe have agreed to talk dozens of times and I have yet to really get a quality conversation with you to shape up the case\nfor trial, and hear we are already facing readiness.. again.\nI\u2019ve left multiple emails and text and calls; dozens trying to get b the court date confirmed and you would not reply\nback. What\u2019s stranger is the court clerks told me I could not obtain my court date info with no case number and they\nconstantly refer me to you. It\u2019s almost like I\u2019m being manipulated and gas lighted and it all feels very immature and\nchildish to say the least.\nToday\u2019s ordeal of being scolded about missing TEO dates when the date I had last noted was the 18th\u2026 this isn\u2019t my\nstyle. I do my homework. I\u2019m on time. I graduated Cum Laud in an accredited engineering school. Worked my through\nduel majors in info science. Slouch I am not. And don\u2019t like being mistreated and lied to.\nThis case is a wonderful mess and it very likely has some officials in Wenatchee and probably Seattle also; sweating.\nNot my intention but also not at all my fault, either.\nYou see I simply called for medical help for my disabled friend and we were told our only option was to get on a personal\ncar with strangers\u2026 and being the good hearted person of trusting faith who I am; I no was taken for a ride.. no pun\nintended.\nI surmise we were lucky n to escape alive and I have some key details which are illustrated by the \u201cvictims\u201d own\nstatement, photographs and probably the 911 call recordings which is another issue entirely.\nI\u2019ve demonstrated that there were nefarious bad actors in this event. People who targeted us before we even called for\nthe ambulance. Then I s things escalated there was an unknown person who was ushered out the back door and\ncoached to flee fast before the police arrived. This woman as it turns out, was\nSALLY BAGSHAW. Former senior prosecutor and city council in Seattle. Embattled representative who aggressively\nprotected Ed Murray even after his incredibly I disgusting history of pedophilia accusations made by African American\nFoster Children.\nThere seems to be a pattern here with these people.\nViolate public trust\nGas light victims\nPlay victim while doing horribly things\nAccuse the accusers of being the culprits\nWithout a doubt Sally Bagshaw will have to get real creative to explain what she was doing at that crummy ranch house\nand why she attempted to flee before police arrived.\nOne of the main reasons this case cannot proceed until I formally have a chance to obtain new counsel;\nThe court staff I pointed out our first day\u2026 superior court stenographer. She was actually involved in the rouse.\nThe merits of the case I feel, represent a clear case of kidnapping and extortion. We were told the only way my friend\nwouldn\u2019t die, is if we got into these folks car. Initially dispatch also lied and said we were going to be picked up by city\ncouncilman. Instead it was rather more dispatchers for the questionable Riverside.\nIn addition they interfered with a medical duress call.\nAnd most disturbing of all\nIn the reports and statements; they made multiple attempts to get me to leave alone. Without my passenger who\nneeded insulin.\nNo sense in claiming they had intended to help her because they never did get her medical attention. So that\u2019s not why.\nI believe the plan was to kill her then chase me down and kill me, then create a false report that I fled the scene after\nkilling g her. Or even worse yet, kill her then arrest me and blame me for the murder.\nOne thing surely though; she wasn\u2019t being held onto for ransom. Or conversation. Or humor. Or money.\nI know in my heart that the plan in Wenatchee called for death to at least one of us, and then incarceration or death to\nthe other (myself). That makes me incredibly sick and I\u2019ve been perplexed by the revelations this past uear in the things\nI\u2019ve discovered afoot around me.\nIt\u2019s sick! And I am not sitting down quietly, I have tactfully presented my findings to a variety of agencies and entities\nand my goal is I to eradicate these criminally corrupt city I people so no more innocent people are harmed.\nI am asking respectfullyfor two things:\n1:) your resignation from this case; and I presume you are released to hear that. I get it. No hard feelings.\n2:) formal request for change of venue due to excessive concerns of witnesses and personell with conflict of interest;\nA) stenographer\nB) Riverside dispatcher #1\nC) Riverside Dispatcher #2\nD) Riverside dispatcher #3\nThese people occupy N salaried positions within the very same courthouse as the halls of justice I am no expected to\npress my case before; and I think it\u2019s foolish to pretend there will be a fair trial of held in Chelan or Douglas.\nI\u2019d hope for some place like Olympia since we now have emerging evidence of a major political scandal amidst this case.\nI\u2019d request to be in the presence of a jury and court personnel who can ensure integrity with a jury trial which involves\nsophisticated deep state orientated bad actors and brazen corruption, disdain for justice, and a sort of grand\nmalfeasance which most mid sized communities are scared to approach.\nThe only Good Samaritan that day was myself.\nI will continue to comply with court directives and I won\u2019t miss any hearings but I have to have access to proper\nchannels in order to learn what my obligations are. I feel like I probably sound patronizing when I say things like that, but\nI can\u2019t see any other way to express that without having access to a lawyer or being told n when new court dates are\nscheduled; I can\u2019t see how I am expected to show up.\nFurther; it\u2019s my understanding the original al court date was on the 5th. I missed that not knowing so they scheduled me\na new court date for today. How am I supposed to know that?\nThe gist I of it all feels like I\u2019m being toyed with by a judge that has some sort of childish vendetta for me. Which is\npretty sad since I have no prior experience with any of you. And if my free speach offended you this much, you folks\npicked the wrong profession. Because this country and our bygone laws as well as our spirit moving forward; are\nfounded firmly around this Nations unrivaled no holds barred FREEDOM OF SPEACH.\nI\u2019m not sure where you learned but I have no doubt t you must have studied more law then I have; but one of my\nmost formative experiences was a Jewish Holocaust survivor I had for a teacher in grade school; and she spent an entire\nweek covering the topic at that time in the 1980\u2019s, about Skinheads and the Aryann Nation, the KKK etc. As kids we\ncouldn\u2019t believe it was tolerated. \u201cSurely it\u2019s illegal!\u201d. No, it\u2019s not. She explained. She went on to quote and provide\nexamples illustrating how the country can only hold up free speech rights by protecting the most hated speech first.\nAnd she taught us that she doesn\u2019t care for it but she doesn\u2019t have to. And it\u2019s not her life she doesn\u2019t have to live that\nway. They do. It doesn\u2019t bother her.\nI\u2019m no right winger. Not racist. I do have concerns about pedophiles grooming school kids. I do have concerns with\nphony liberals and vocalize them. But that\u2019s because I was raised in an established democratic family and felt they failed\nto do the right thing g too many times. And to be honest it was just this sort of dishonest conduct.\nFor the level of contempt one of two things is occurring. You all are spending too much time n on my social media where\nI\u2019ve been bound to whole undergoing this trial. Or you have a particularly right wing mind set, regardless of party\nidentify. We are all fluid social animals. Don\u2019t get hu g up on my personal life of acting a fool online to pass time etc.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case_2.pdf", "filename": "email_Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.631656", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important", "summary": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...", "body": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\n2 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\n3 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to\ncome view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was\nfloored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on\nvideo. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other\nthan to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n4 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_genericWeCantHelpYouResponseWSBA_May-9-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_genericWeCantHelpYouResponseWSBA_May-9-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.392641", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "1\n2\n3\n4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\nIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHELAN\n5\n6\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON,\n7 CASE NO.: 24-1-00253-04\nPlaintiff,\n8\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM\nvs. 9 DEFENDANT TO PRESERVE\nRYAN HELL, EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL,\n10\nPHONE, TEXT, RADIO\nDefendant.", "body": "1\n2\n3\n4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\nIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHELAN\n5\n6\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON,\n7 CASE NO.: 24-1-00253-04\nPlaintiff,\n8\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM\nvs.\n9 DEFENDANT TO PRESERVE\nRYAN HELL, EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL,\n10\nPHONE, TEXT, RADIO\nDefendant.\n11\n12\n13 I. MOTION\n14\nA. Motion to Preserve Evidence and Address Potential Spoliation\n15\nThe Defense moves to preserve the following evidence, given concerns about potential\n16\ntampering due to the case\u2019s implications of civil rights violations under color of law and ADA\n17\n18 violations:\n19\n1. All 911 call audio from July 4, 2024, specifically the defendant\u2019s initial call to Rivercom\n20\n911 requesting emergency medical services for their passenger, a type 1 diabetic with chronic\n21\n22 illnesses, including failing kidneys and a brain tumor, legally disabled under federal law and a\n23\nSocial Security recipient.\n24\nThis call establishes the defendant\u2019s sole intent was to secure urgent medical help, explicitly\n25\n26 declining roadside assistance despite dispatch\u2019s insistence. The defense is concerned this audio\n27\nmay no longer exist, as it has not been provided or acknowledged.\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -1\n2. Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) files from Rivercom 911 for the July 4, 2024, incident,\n1\n2 including call classification, timestamps, and dispatcher notes, to verify the call\u2019s existence and\n3\nhandling, especially if the audio has been lost. Washington State law requires CAD files to be\n4\nretained for three years, and with one year elapsed, preservation is urgent.\n5\n6 3. Chelan County Sheriff\u2019s communication records from July 4, 2024, including radio logs,\n7\nphone call logs, text messages, emails, and any other communication records that may document\n8\ninteractions with Rivercom 911 regarding the defendant\u2019s medical emergency call. These records\n9\nare critical to confirm Rivercom\u2019s acknowledgment of the defendant\u2019s request for an ambulance\n10\n11 and any coordination with the Sheriff\u2019s office, which may have declined involvement, as a\n12\nsecondary precaution against the prosecution\u2019s claim that no such call occurred.\n13\n4. Video evidence metadata and access logs, as described above, to ensure integrity and\n14\n15 detect tampering.\n16\n5. Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911\n17\ndispatchers, not private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\n18\n19 The defense has eyewitness testimony that these individuals work for Rivercom and\n20\ntransported the defendant and their passenger to a private residence outside cell service under\n21\nquestionable pretenses.\n22\n23 Failure to preserve this evidence risks spoliation, especially given the high propensity\n24\nfor tampering in a case involving allegations of misconduct by Rivercom personnel who failed to\n25\nsecure an ambulance for a disabled passenger.\n26\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -2\nMotion to Address Denial of Effective Counsel and Civil Rights Violations\n1\n2 The defense moves to address the denial of effective legal counsel, constituting a\n3\nviolation of the defendant\u2019s Sixth Amendment rights.\n4\nThe defendant\u2019s first attorney resigned within three days, citing corruption and\n5\n6 refusing involvement. The second attorney failed to provide evidence, communicate, or act on the\n7\ncase for nearly eight months, effectively denying representation.\n8\nThe current attorney, while filing this motion due to the defendant\u2019s inability to\n9\nafford private counsel and the distance between Seattle and Chelan County, has not denied\n10\n11 allegations of being influenced by opposing parties, raising concerns about compromised\n12\nrepresentation.\n13\nThis pattern of ineffective counsel has obstructed access to exculpatory evidence\n14\n15 critical to the defense.\n16\nAdditionally, the defense raises serious civil rights violations under color of law\n17\nand ADA violations.\n18\n19 The defendant\u2019s passenger, a disabled woman, was denied emergency medical services\n20\ndespite multiple 911 calls, exacerbating her life-threatening condition.\n21\nThe defense alleges the incident involved misconduct by Rivercom dispatchers, who\n22\n23 assaulted the defendant and demanded $1,000, as partially captured in the video.\n24\nThe defense requests an investigation into these violations, including the conduct of\n25\nRivercom dispatchers and the handling of the medical emergency call, to ensure justice and protect\n26\nthe defendant\u2019s constitutional rights.\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -3\nSummary and Urgent Relief Requested\n1\n2 The defense respectfully requests the following immediate actions:\n3\n1. Compel the prosecution to disclose all video evidence from the July 4, 2024, Malaga\n4\nincident, including metadata, forensic data, and access logs.\n5\n6 2. Preserve all 911 call audio, CAD files, Chelan County Sheriff\u2019s communication records\n7\n(radio logs, phone logs, texts, emails), video evidence, and records confirming the alleged victims\u2019\n8\nemployment as Rivercom 911 dispatchers, with associated metadata and access logs, to prevent\n9\ntampering.\n10\n11 3. Investigate the denial of effective counsel, civil rights violations under color of law,\n12\nand ADA violations stemming from the failure to provide emergency medical services to the\n13\ndefendant\u2019s disabled passenger.\n14\n15 4. Issue an order to expedite these motions due to the imminent trial date and the\n16\ndefendant\u2019s residence in Seattle, which limits their ability to file independently without counsel.\n17\nGiven the severity of the allegations, including evidence tampering and misconduct,\n18\n19 the defense urges the Court to act swiftly to ensure a fair trial and uphold justice.\n20\nTo ensure justice and transparency, I respectfully move this Court to issue an order\n21\npreserving the following evidence related to the incident:\n22\n23 1. All 911 call audio recordings from July 4, 2024, related to the incident at 7599 Colockum\n24\nRd, Malaga, WA, to verify the nature of the communications.\n25\n2. All Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) files associated with the incident, including call\n26\nclassifications, timestamps, and dispatcher notes.\n27\n28 3. All RiverCom 911 correspondence, including radio chatter, telephone calls, text\n29\nmessages, emails, and any other communications, particularly those between dispatcher Jeremiah\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -4\nand deputies, including any conducted via personal cell phones, which is irregular for official\n1\n2 business.\n3\n4. All law enforcement body camera and dash camera footage from the incident, including\n4\nunedited versions, along with all forensic metadata, access logs, and chain of custody records to\n5\n6 verify potential tampering and ensure evidence integrity.\n7\n5. All records related to the hit-and-run by the red Toyota Tacoma (license plate C204747),\n8\nincluding any communications referencing the VIP or her departure from the scene.\n9\n6. All records documenting RiverCom 911 call center logs and procedures to identify any\n10\n11 tampering or alterations.\n12\nPreservation of these materials is critical to substantiate my claims of excessive force, false\n13\naccusations, evidence tampering, and potential misconduct, given the unusually long dispatch\n14\n15 response time, which local discussion attributes to deputies waiting roadside for approximately ten\n16\nminutes before approaching the property, likely to allow the VIP to leave.\n17\n18\n19 II. STATEMENT\n20\nOn July 4, 2024, at approximately, at 7599 Colockum Rd, Malaga, WA, I, Ryan Hell, was\n21\nsubjected to an unconstitutional stop and arrest by Chelan County sheriff\u2019s deputies, involving\n22\n23 excessive force, conflicting orders, and false claims that I was holding a firearm.\n24\nDespite no weapon being present in broad daylight with no obstructions, one deputy\n25\nclaimed to see a specific make, model, and caliber of a pistol in my hand, asserting the safety was\n26\noff, while another deputy questioned if a gun was visible, escalating the situation.\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -5\nDeputies threatened to shoot me, stating, \u201cYou\u2019ve got five seconds,\u201d \u201cMy hammer\u2019s\n1\n2 back,\u201d and \u201cOne more word and you\u2019re dead,\u201d while issuing conflicting orders: one instructed me\n3\nto get on my knees and cross my ankles, while another shouted not to move or he would kill me.\n4\nI attempted to de-escalate, identifying myself as cooperative and unarmed, but collapsed\n5\n6 due to severe heat exhaustion and a muscle cramp, which likely prevented an unjustified shooting,\n7\nas I was prone and non-combative.\n8\nI possess photographs of dispatcher Jeremiah using his personal cell phone, allegedly\n9\ncommunicating with deputies, which is irregular for official business and suggests potential\n10\n11 misconduct.\n12\nI overheard deputies discussing a VIP, code-named \u201cMustang\u201d or similar, believed to be\n13\nSally Bagshaw, former Seattle councilwoman, who struck me in a hit-and-run with a red Toyota\n14\n15 Tacoma (Washington license plate C204747, 2022 or 2024 TRD Pro, dark maroon with black\n16\naccent alloy wheels).\n17\nMy photographs show the driver, attempting to cover her face, getting closer to me as I\n18\n19 held up my phone to capture the incident, before she floored the vehicle and fled.\n20\nDash camera footage, viewed at my attorney\u2019s office, appears altered, with suspicious\n21\nlighting, shading, jittering loops, and segments where individuals seem to engage in animated\n22\n23 conversations with no one present, suggesting edited-out characters.\n24\nAs a former visual analyst at Google in Kirkland, Washington, in 2010, with expertise in\n25\ngraphics development, software engineering, user interface design, and video editing since the\n26\n1990s, I can confirm these anomalies indicate tampering.\n27\n28 My attorney intended to hire a forensics expert to examine the footage, but the expert is\n29\nunavailable due to unpaid fees from a prior Chelan County case unrelated to mine.\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -6\nEvidence suggests RiverCom 911 may also be altering call center logs and procedures to\n1\n2 conceal critical communications.\n3\n4\nRespectfully submitted this ____ day of June, 2025.\n5\n6\n7\nRYAN HELL, DEFENDANT\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\n26\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -7\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/MyMotionToPreserveEvidenceWhichWasDenied.pdf", "filename": "MyMotionToPreserveEvidenceWhichWasDenied.pdf", "size_mb": 0.26, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.868659", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file this into the record Sean,", "summary": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford.", "body": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford. Help with\nher shopping, her chores, shopping, laundry and her dogs which i am helping her train. I have told Juystin during the\nfirst week, in a hearing at the courthouse, I requested access to ask the court for provisions for mrs Hrpcha and Titus\ninformed me that he didnt see her listed as a \"witness\", therefor there was no problem at that time with mrs Hrpcha\nbeing in contact with me.\nMy concern now would be restrictions on communication with mrs Hrpcha, if I add her as a witness. Obviously\nthis is a matter with importance since I generally see Mrs Hrpcha every day and she is in fact going to be driving me to\ncourt on monday.\nWhat are your thoughts?\nThank you\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:49 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nAlright, I can file it into the court file and provide it as discovery to the prosecutor.\nHowever, if the case proceeds to trial, the court the court will want live testimony from fact witnesses.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:19 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file this into the record\nSean,\nUntil otherwise informed, I am still reliant on you and need you to file this onto the record into evidence please.\nThank you.\nGmail - Re: Please file this into the record 1/3/26, 12:15 PM\nStatement, voluntary, from passenger Gina\nDisability certification, for passenger Gina", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.768670", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "; crowe@seattletimes.com; cwinfrey@seattletimes.com;", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Urgent Legal Case - Evidence of Government Misconduct [EXTERNAL]", "summary": "[EXTERNAL]\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon.", "body": "[EXTERNAL]\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon. I desperately need legal representation or media attention.\nRyan Hell(267) 777-2344", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct_2.pdf", "filename": "email_RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.674644", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Submission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nUnited States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Report successfully submitted\nYour record number is: 705740-PNG\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights violations, spot\ntrends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.", "body": "Submission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nUnited States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division.\nReport successfully submitted\nYour record number is: 705740-PNG\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights violations, spot\ntrends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.\n2 Our specialists determine the next step\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the Justice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report. If so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your report and will\nrecommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid organization.\n3 When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not always be able to\nprovide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 1 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you provided in this report.\nDepending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you need to reach us about your report,\nplease refer to your report number when contacting us. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat you can do next\n1 Contact local legal aid organizations or a lawyer if you haven\u2019t already\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help you with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices), to help you find a legal aid lawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2 Get help immediately if you are in danger\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still experiencing physical\nharm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911 and contact the police.\nYour submission\nContact\nContact information\nYour name\nRyan Hell\nEmail address\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nPhone number\n+12677772344\nAddress\n11015 10th ave sw\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 2 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\n-\nSeattle, Washington 98144\nAre you now or have ever been an active duty service member?\nNo\nPrimary concern\nWhat is your primary reason for contacting the Civil Rights Division?\nSomething else happened\nLocation\nWhere did this happen?\nOrganization name\n350 Orondo Ave. Suite 501\nAddress\n-\n-\nWenatchee, Washington\nPersonal characteristics\nDo you believe any of these personal characteristics influenced why you were treated this way?\nDisability (including temporary or recovered and including HIV and drug addiction)\nFamily, marital, or parental status\nReligion\nOther reason\nDate\nWhen did this happen?\n1/26/2026\nPersonal description\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 3 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nIn your own words, describe what happened\nrel to prior doj rept for kidnapping under color of law during 911 medical duress call in state park 4th july\n2024. Falsely charged to disappear me I fear... and the case is still going, today at trial readiness PD and\njudge said ready: I asserted ONGOING unanwered problems w/ court reporter present most of first year of\nproceedings, was same woman introduced as alleged vics mother at crime scene. Judge is redacting and\naltering docket ahs also removed evidence all w/o telling me. Changed judges names in docket history\nalso. Appointed FIVE attorneys in total now all have refused to engage, all quit, docket chabged on that\nalso. dashcam footage tampered I found using forensics tools. 3d manip, Ai tool micro alter easily see,\ncalled sheriff to report, that night atrny copied ovver, delet. I have screen shots. Judge has rebuked my\nmotiuon to preserve evidence and forensics for 16 MNTHS. A retrd VIP, chief pros, FLED crime scene as\nsheriffs waited. TODAY I ASSERTED THESE FACTS AGAIN and the judge said he is sending me to eastern\nstate. PLEASE HELP; this is a coordinated conspiracy to silence me for whistleblowing! I HAVE MOUN-\nTAINS of evidence at my ryanhellfacts . com This operation utilized a 911 system and its op manager, to\ndivert my duress call. Then the op man came disguised as a volunteer, then raced us out into another\ncanyon to an isolated home where my passengers and my phone did not work. We were held from 1PM\nwhen call 911 until my arrest for alleged thrts. I was punched int he head while thre op man held a gun over\nme. I NEVER faught I have a SOLID LAWSUIT so i just smiled waiited for deputies... the op man panicked\nafter the plan to incite a fight so he could shoot me dead failed i think. THE 911 companu is Rivercom 911\nand is part privately owned by sheriff and VIP's. Its an illegal intel operation and was used to facilitate an\nattmot MURDER. They let the op man go after 18 YEARS.. and the 911 company is finally moving OFF of\ncounty land too now. They JUST retired the coroner and he was not retuirement age, so I fear the worse,\nTODAY THE JUDGE ORDERED ME TO EASTERN STATE MENTAL EVAL just for saying the coiurt is railroad-\ning me and identifying the excessive evidence, in summary, which would clearly prove that. PLEAASE\nHELP. I AM NOIT GUYILTY OF ANYTHING EXCEPT LIFE SAVING PATIENCE AND DETERMINATION and\nadesperate cabal of corrupt and illegal lawmen and politicos are desperately attempting to bury me....\nEastern State mental hospital is a cess pool of death its in the news routinely over lawsuits now. I am ab-\nsolutley rational and sane and not on drugs. PLEASE HELP\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 4 of 4\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/DoJ-705740-PNG_January_25_2026.pdf", "filename": "DoJ-705740-PNG_January_25_2026.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:23.133674", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a\ncouple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a\ncouple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a conflict\nof interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit murder.\nI\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask you to\ncarefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect everyone\nlikes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of July for\nthem. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was introduced to\nme and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the Stenographer. I\nattempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get her formal name.\nMOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL PROSECUTOR aND established\nSEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of become a political target OF; SALLY\nBAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What is more damnign; for the state; is I even\nhave photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by the alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the\ncops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t mean anything for me today or next month in\nmy jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and the incidents here are only indicators of a much\nbroader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July 4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic\nfriend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service aside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty\ndispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in their pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no\naid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000. I reminded driver it was unauthorized. He\nsurrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my truck. Without going on more the case argues\nthat Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill. Ryan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial\nappointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed and texted Justin Titus and never been able to\ncommunicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at least 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I\nhad to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with some preliminary discovery materials, which was the\npolice report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a proper working email. I have faith in my innocence and\nI was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail and clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good\nconscience for several decades. I have been proactive in obtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and\ndefense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing court clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout,\neach week to connect with council, Titus told him I had concerns about the duration of records being kept which would\nbe exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did not reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a\npersonal appearance in Chelan Superior some time earlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and\navailable and not destroyed. My concern, as I told Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by\ndispatchers based in the initial conversation on 911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or\nrequest any sort of roadside assistance for the flat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have\nfamiliarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and run my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for\ntech products throughout the state, for 7 years while attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of\none which is not going to take any gruff and I respect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something\nfrom a guy who is being charged after tactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what\nappeared to be a very elaborate effort to do me and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to\ncouncil where this matter would be best suited: I will present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and\ndetermine if this is a problem for this court. Again I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen\ninto some sort of destruction cross hairs by judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was\nbeing ousted for his earlier career in youth works and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a\ndisgusting string of predatory events namely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African\nAmerican descent. These allegations had been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and\nworkers. A substantial enough amount of this eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court\nhearing and a sworn judge took careful inventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of\nmolesting those kids and he was in fact every bit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed\nMurray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and he moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle.\nAccusations came out and Murray denied them. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a\nlot of cheering amongst many of us who had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for\njustice. And perseverance, the strong will the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the\nbad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that plaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was\nsomething we had a hard time with a lot of us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter\nsaid they had an anonymous tip who only said Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that\nhe was actually a molestor\u2026 and the case is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4\ndays. They asked me for advice. I simply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol\nrecords. Two days later the Murray lies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this\napply to our case? In the incident, as I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the\nhomeowners saying the police were gonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed\nonsite. I then heard a woman frantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some\nmen said back \u201cyou gotta go now just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing\nshe was yet another piece of evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named\n\u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a career politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career\ninvolves being a senior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed\nMurray and she had aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of\naccusers presented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally\nattempted to keep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad\ncoach, probably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending\nEd Murray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a disgusting\nvulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy creating\npolitical cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express stimulating\nthought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even mafia types.\nSo dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express our intended\nmessage. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between some things\nand it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my name tagged and\nharassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by professional contractors.\nThat FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat unfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my\nwife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work walking to her bus stop at Dash Point\nRoad near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She was robbed by a man who produced a\nhand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They never caught that man and a detective later\nsmirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and looked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are\nmoving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019. I\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep\nstate types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a desert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and\nphotos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we enjoyed the view, that there were people watching\nus. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had my own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both\nsides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting visitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a\nfire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all. Absolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the\nnight of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my license plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done\nsomeone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it. Then Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip\nover to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to try to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to\nexecute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and she is THE well established primary alpha protector of my\nprimarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since 2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of\nher before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a former SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen\nengaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate for me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change\nwho my biological parents were. But I can change the way the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\nHi Ryan,\nWe actually have court today. I am glad your phone is working. Are you able to come to court today?\nThe judge would like you here in person if possible. If not, I can try to get it moved until Wednesday or next Monday\nbut let me know what would work for you.\nThanks,\nOn Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:26 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nI have a working phone again. I will try to call you tomorrow around 9am.\nRyan\n(267)777-2344\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg, 527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-\nD3D164A07FFC.jpeg, IMG_6448.jpeg, IMG_6452.jpeg\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Re-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.729657", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the en\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve\nstatus.\nIn accordance with RCW23.95.605-610, the above en\u0000ty is hereby administra\u0000vely dissolved as of: 03/03/2025.\nThis ac\u0000on was taken due to failure of the en\u0000ty to file a required report within the \u0000me set forth by law.\nUnder RCW 23.95.615, a domes\u0000c en\u0000ty that is administra\u0000vely dissolved may apply for reinstatement no later than five (5)\nyears a\u0000er the effec\u0000ve date of administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on noted above. RCW 23.95.615 iden\u0000fies the requirements for an\napplica\u0000on for reinstatement.\nYou can access the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) online to reac\u0000vate your\nen\u0000ty using the following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. This no\u0000ce is generated as part of\nan automated no\u0000fica\u0000on process.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/noticeofdisolutionSexretaryofStateWa.pdf", "filename": "noticeofdisolutionSexretaryofStateWa.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.518667", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion_2.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.159650", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:53 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:53 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email. This is an unmonitored account.\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Please save your record\nnumber for tracking. Your record number is: 633568-CVL.\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still\nexperiencing physical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911\nand contact the police.\nWhat to Expect\n1. We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil\nrights violations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your\nreport.\n2. Our specialists determine the next steps\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the\nJustice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report.\nIf so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your\nreport and will recommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid\norganization.\n3. When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not\nalways be able to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you\nprovided in this report. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you\nneed to reach us about your report, please refer to your report number when contacting\nus. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat You Can Do Next\n1. Contact local legal aid organizations or a\nlawyer if you haven\u2019t already.\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help\nyou with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices),to help you find a legal aid\nlawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2. Learn More\nVisit civilrights.justice.gov to learn more about your rights and see examples of\nviolations we handle.\nPlease Note: Each week, we receive hundreds of reports of potential violations. We\ncollect and analyze this information to help us select cases, and we may use this\ninformation as evidence in an existing case. We will review your letter to decide\nwhether it is necessary to contact you for additional information. We do not have the\nresources to follow-up on every letter.\nContact\ncivilrights.justice.gov U.S. Department of (202) 514-3847\nJustice 1-855-856-1247 (toll-free)\nCivil Rights Division Telephone Device for the\n950 Pennsylvania Deaf\nAvenue, NW (TTY) (202) 514-0716\nWashington, D.C.\n20530-0001\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division_2.pdf", "filename": "email_Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.253652", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Search Search \u2192\nBills, meetings, and session \uf078 State laws and rules \uf078 Learn and participate \uf078 Legislators \uf078 About the Legislature \uf078\nHome / State laws and rules / WACs / Title 204 / Chapter 204-91A / Section 204-91A-180 Print\n204-91A-170 << 204-91A-180 >> End of Chapter\nWAC 204-91A-180\nPDF Agency filings affecting this section\nAdditional Towing and Tow Operator Qualifications,\nRestrictions, and Requirements. In addition to the requirements contained in WAC 204-91A-170, registered tow truck operators appointed pursuant to this chapter must conform to all laws\nand administrative rules pertaining to the tow industry and must observe the following practices and procedures:\n(1) When called by the patrol during normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck, from within the assigned zone within five minutes after\nreceiving the call.", "body": "Search Search \u2192\nBills, meetings, and session \uf078 State laws and rules \uf078 Learn and participate \uf078 Legislators \uf078 About the Legislature \uf078\nHome / State laws and rules / WACs / Title 204 / Chapter 204-91A / Section 204-91A-180 Print\n204-91A-170 << 204-91A-180 >> End of Chapter\nWAC 204-91A-180\nPDF Agency filings affecting this section\nAdditional Towing and Tow Operator Qualifications,\nRestrictions, and Requirements.\nIn addition to the requirements contained in WAC 204-91A-170, registered tow truck operators appointed pursuant to this chapter must conform to all laws\nand administrative rules pertaining to the tow industry and must observe the following practices and procedures:\n(1) When called by the patrol during normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck, from within the assigned zone within five minutes after\nreceiving the call. Tow trucks must be registered to and belong to the particular tow business that is called and assigned only to that tow zone. If an officer at the scene\ndeems it necessary, the officer may authorize additional assistance from a registered tow operator outside of the tow zone.\n(2) When called by the patrol after normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck from within the assigned zone within fifteen minutes after\nreceiving the call.\n(3) The tow truck that is dispatched must arrive at the stated location within a reasonable time considering distance, traffic, and weather conditions.\n(4) If for any reason a tow operator is unable to dispatch a tow truck within the stated time or if the dispatched truck will be delayed for any reason, the tow\noperator must advise the patrol stating the reason and estimated time of arrival. In the event the tow truck fails to arrive at the scene within a reasonable time, the\npatrol will contact another tow operator to respond to the scene and will cancel the original tow.\n(5) A tow operator on rotation who is unable to dispatch or arrive within the times stated in subsections (1), (2), (3), and (4) of this section will forfeit the tow\noperator's turn and be placed at the bottom of the rotation list as if the tow operator had responded.\n(6) Repeated refusal or failure of the appointee to respond to calls from the patrol for towing services or to provide the requested services may result in the\nsuspension or revocation of the tow operator's letter of appointment.\n(7) If the tow operator will be unavailable for twenty-four hours or more to respond to rotational calls with a class \"A,\" \"B,\" or \"C\" tow truck, the tow operator\nmust advise the appropriate patrol office. Unavailability may occur due to conditions including, but not limited to, other tow truck commitments, tow truck disabled\nand/or under repair, unforeseen driver shortage due to illness. The tow operator must give the reason for unavailability and the approximate date and time when the\ncompany will be available to respond to calls.\nThe tow company will be removed from the rotational list and will not be called until the tow operator advises the patrol that the company is once again able to\nrespond to calls with an \"A,\" \"B,\" or \"C\" class truck. In all such cases, the tow company will resume its normal position on the rotational list without regard to any missed\ncalls or its position prior to being unavailable.\n(8) The tow operator must advise the patrol whenever a private call is received for a tow with circumstances that indicate that the tow is for a vehicle that has\nbeen involved in a collision, incident, or equipment breakdown on the public roadway. The tow operator also must advise the patrol of all private calls to motor vehicle\ncollisions on private property resulting in bodily injury or death.\n(9) The tow operator must notify the patrol before moving any vehicle involved in a collision on a public highway under the jurisdiction of the patrol as defined in\nthe motor vehicle code, Title 46 RCW, or where it appears that the driver of the vehicle to be moved is under the influence of intoxicants or drugs, or is otherwise\nincapacitated.\n(10) Other than a service patrol established and funded by the department of transportation, a tow operator must not solicit tow or roadside services by\npatrolling the public roadways searching for disabled vehicles or vehicles involved in a traffic collision.\n(11) When the patrol is in charge of a collision scene or other such incident, a tow operator must not respond to such scene unless his services have been\nspecifically requested by the patrol, the vehicle's owner or operator, or the owner's authorized representative.\n(12) The tow operator must be available, or will ensure that specific employees are available, twenty-four hours a day for the purpose of receiving calls or\narranging for the release of vehicles. Business hours will be posted conspicuously at the tow operator's place of business so they can be seen during business hours and\nnonbusiness hours. A copy must also be sent to the inspector of the district in which the tow operator does business. Changes of business hours must be sent to the\ndepartment and the inspector ten days before their effective date.\n(13) The tow operator must post a current copy of tow and storage rates, on a form approved by the department and the patrol, in the following locations:\n(a) At the entrance to the place of business, in a conspicuous location, plainly visible and capable of being read by the public, whether the business is open or\nclosed. If, in order to meet this requirement, the rate sheets must be placed in a location, exposed to the elements, they must be protected so as to remain legible.\n(b) Inside the business location, where business is commonly transacted. The rate sheets must be posted in such manner as to be clearly and plainly visible and\nread at all times by customers of the business.\n(c) A copy of the current rates will be sent to the department, the section, and the patrol district commander of the district in which the tow operator has applied\nfor a letter of appointment. Notice of any change(s) in service rates will be forwarded to the department, the section, and the district commander of the area ten days\nbefore the effective date of the changes. Charges made for towing services arising from calls initiated by the patrol must be consistent with current posted towing\nrates and must be based only upon services listed on the prescribed form.\n(d) In the event that a tow operator has only a class \"B\" truck and utilizes it for class \"A\" and \"B\" type tows, the tow operator must file a rate sheet that specifies\nthe rates charged for the different types of tows.\n(e) Whenever any tow operator utilizes a larger truck than the towed vehicle warrants, the tow operator must charge fees based on the size of the towed vehicle\nnot the size of the truck used.\n(14) Charges made for towing services arising from calls initiated by the patrol must not exceed the maximum rates established by the chief.\n(15) Unless other arrangements are made with commissioned patrol personnel at the scene, all impounded vehicles must be taken to the tow operators nearest\napproved storage location within the tow operator's assigned tow zone.\n(16) The tow operator will maintain, for three years, records on towed and released vehicles which were towed at the request of the patrol. Such records will be\navailable for inspection by the patrol during normal business hours at the tow operator's place of business. Records will include, but not be limited to:\n(a) An itemized receipt of all charges for the services provided.\n(b) A tow impound record inventory or copy thereof made out by the trooper at the scene of the tow and signed by the tow operator.\n(c) All other records required by the department.\n(17) The first and last name of the tow truck driver will be placed on the tow impound inventory record made out by the patrol officer at the scene and the officer\nmay verify their driver's license; except that the signature may be provided on existing forms with form number 3000-110-076 (R 7/11) until current stock is depleted.\n(18) Tow operators must obtain and maintain a current registration certificate as required by RCW 46.55.020.\n(19) Tow operators must perform towing tasks competently. The standard of competence will be that quality of work which is accepted as efficient and effective\nwithin the towing industry. The tow operator must ensure tow truck drivers responding to calls initiated by the patrol have completed a minimum of one four-hour tow\ntruck driver training course every five years. The tow operator must keep a file documenting training.\n(20) No tow operator, employee, or agent will misappropriate, wrongfully convert to his/her own use, or abuse property belonging to another and entrusted to\nhis/her care or storage.\n(21) Tow operators must use emergency lights to warn other motorists only when at the scene of collisions, disabled vehicles, and/or recoveries. Such lighting\nmust not be used when traveling to or from the scene.\n(22) Tow operators are required to clean collision/incident scenes of all vehicle glass, debris, and vehicle liquid spills of one gallon or less.\n(23) Specific operating restrictions and/or requirements, by truck class, are as follows:\n(a) The standard air brake release tools (caging stud assemblies) required to be carried in the class \"B,\" \"B-2,\" and \"C\" trucks must be used, whenever necessary,\nto preserve potential evidence involving brake equipment or adjustment settings. When a tow operator is attempting to move a vehicle equipped with locked spring\nparking brakes that cannot be released by external air supply, the caging assemblies must be used to release the brake tension. Under no circumstances will the towed\nvehicle's brake assemblies or adjustments be moved or disturbed in any way that will prevent later determination of the precollision or incident settings.\n(b) Class \"B\" or \"B-2\" trucks in excess of twenty-three thousand pounds gross vehicle weight rating need not carry dollies when towing or recovering heavy\nvehicles.\n(24) Whenever a \"special event or overflow\" storage lot is approved by the department, the patrol and appropriate city/county jurisdictions, the following must\napply:\n(a) The tow operator must maintain personnel at the lot twenty-four hours per day for security and vehicle and/or personal property release. If necessary,\nreimbursement for such labor must be part of the contract for the \"special event\" if appropriate or by amended storage rates with a waiver of the ten-day rate change\nnotice requirement approved by the department and the patrol.\n(b) At the conclusion of a \"special event or overflow\" situation, all vehicles not reclaimed by the vehicle's owner or the owner's authorized representative must\nbe towed to the tow operator's regular storage facility and processed in the normal fashion. No additional fee must be charged for towing the vehicle from the\noverflow lot to the regular storage facility.\n(25) All work performed by the tow operator and/or employee must be in the most professional and expeditious manner. Tow operators and employees must\nrefrain from any unprofessional actions while towing for or conducting towing business at the request of the patrol. The actions include, but are not limited to, any of\nthe following:\n(a) Lack of service, selective service, or refusal to provide service which the tow operator should be capable of performing;\n(b) Exhibiting any signs of either alcohol, drug use, or both;\n(c) Displaying any objects, logos, slogans, or graphic material within the view of the public that contains any form of pornography, profanity, or prejudice toward\nany person or group of persons; and\n(d) Directing toward a vehicle's owner, operator or the owner's authorized representative any profanity or slurs based on the person's culture, race, gender or\nsexual preference.\n(26) Tow operators must, when required by the patrol or the department, cause to be displayed on each approved truck, decals indicating truck class, patrol\ndistrict, and/or assigned tow zone.\n(27) When responding to a patrol call, tow truck driver must wear clothing identifying the company and the driver's first name. The driver's first name is the first\nname used on the person's driver's license or a nickname that the person commonly uses and by which the person is commonly known.\n(28) Tow truck drivers performing recovery, impounding, or towing must wear work vests of highly visible materials, or equivalent distinguishing apparel when\noutside of the towing vehicle as outlined in WAC 296-155-200(5) and Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23 Part 634.3.\n(29) Tow operators must not display any sign, shield, marking, accessory, or insignia on uniforms or vehicles indicating the equipment or vehicle marking are\nsimilar to or belong to any public law enforcement agency. Tow operators must not engage in any advertisement indicating an official connection with the patrol or\nother law enforcement agency.\n[Statutory Authority: RCW 46.55.115. WSR 17-10-029, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 4/26/17, effective 5/27/17. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005, 46.55.050, and\n46.55.115. WSR 13-18-065, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 9/3/13, effective 10/4/13. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.55.050, 46.55.115, and 46.55.075. WSR 13-11-112, \u00a7 204-\n91A-180, filed 5/21/13, effective 6/21/13. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005, 46.55.050, and 46.55.115. WSR 09-09-118, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 4/21/09, effective\n5/22/09. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005 and 46.55.115. WSR 07-02-025A, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 12/22/06, effective 1/22/07. Statutory Authority: RCW\n46.37.005, 46.55.050, and 46.55.115. WSR 02-07-056, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 3/15/02, effective 4/15/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005 and 46.55.050. WSR\n94-18-083, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 9/2/94, effective 10/3/94. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.61.567. WSR 89-21-044, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 10/13/89, effective\n11/13/89. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.35.005 [46.37.005]. WSR 89-14-015 (Order 89-04-ESR), \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 6/23/89.]\nStudies, audits, and reports Accessibility\nPerformance audits Jobs\nLegislative questions or comments\nActuarial reporting Public records requests\nCall the Legislative Hotline\n1-800-562-6000 Transportation studies and Site help\nreports\nTTY for deaf/hard of hearing: 1-800-833-6388\nContact us\nReports from outside\nLearn more about the Legislative Hotline\norganizations Email updates (GovDelivery)\nInvestigation reports\nDisclaimer Privacy Notice \u00a9 Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/WAC 204-91A-180.pdf", "filename": "WAC 204-91A-180.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.551667", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Chelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nComplaint-25- CAD Incident\nLanguage English Complaint # 2410025304\n00031 #\nDate of Time of\n12/15/25 1152\nComplaint Complaint\nIndividual Filing the Complaint (Ryan Hell)\nEnter your personal information so we may contact you directly if our investigators have any additional\nquestions and to notify you upon completion of our investigation. You may remain anonymous by checking the appropriate checkbox if you wish, however, we will have\nno means to notify you of the outcome of the investigation.", "body": "Chelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nComplaint-25- CAD Incident\nLanguage English Complaint # 2410025304\n00031 #\nDate of Time of\n12/15/25 1152\nComplaint Complaint\nIndividual Filing the Complaint (Ryan Hell)\nEnter your personal information so we may contact you directly if our investigators have any additional\nquestions and to notify you upon completion of our investigation.\nYou may remain anonymous by checking the appropriate checkbox if you wish, however, we will have\nno means to notify you of the outcome of the investigation. If you complete this form on behalf of\nanother, please provide your information in addition to the individual's information on whose behalf you\nsubmitting this complaint.\nComplainant is a\nNo\nminor/needs help.\nI want to remain\nanonymous.\nFirst Name Ryan Middle Name Michael Last Name Hell\n11015 10th ave\nAddress City Seattle State WA\nsw\n267-777-2344 267-777-2344\nZip 98144 Home phone Cell phone\nx_____ x_____\nryanbrooklyn202\nAdditional phone Email Additional Email\n0@gmail.com\nDate of Birth 01/09/78 Age 47 Race White\nDriver\u2019s License\nGender Male WDL686B5123B Disability No\n#\nPrimary Are you able to\nBest time to\nanytime Language English communicate in Yes\ncontact?\nSpoken English?\nArrested? Yes Citation Number 2410025304\nInjury Information\nWas complainant\ninjured during the Yes\nincident?\nDid you seek\nType of Injury Unknown Severity of Injury Unknown medical Yes\nattention?\nDoctor Information\nDoctor\u2019s Name Doctor\u2019s Phone\nAttorney Information\nAttorney's Name Attorney's Phone\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 1 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nEmployee ( )\nPlease enter any information of the employee(s) who you are complaining on. if you do not know the\ninvolved employee's name or ID number, please describe them as best as possible as this will assist\nthe Department in identifying the employee.\nEmployee Information\nEmployee #\nFirst name Middle name Last name\nAge Race Gender\nIn Uniform\nDescription of\nEmployee\nVehicle Information\nVehicle Make Vehicle Model Vehicle Color\nVehicle\nVehicle Number\nCharacteristics\nIncident\nDate of Incident\nDate of Incident Day of Incident Time of Incident\nIncident Location\nAddress City State\nZip\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 2 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nEVIDENCE OF INTENTIONAL ALTERED AND TAMPERED SHERIFFS DASH CAM FOOTAGE\nOn July 4th 2024 myself and a DISABLED passenger were legally camping in a DESIGNATED\nDiscovery Campground on 3rd of July, with her companion dogs. We found ourselves\nsrtranded due to flat tires and my passenger informed me then that she had not brought\nher insulin. I spent nearly 6 hours desperartely racing to get us out of the deseert\nenvironment back to road saftey and cell service and ultimately became stuck. I called\n911 and was told no help woul;d come and my only choice was to allow volunteers to\ntake us to a house to meet an ambulance. Some 45 minutes later a truck with man and\nwoman arrive and oidentified themselves as volunteers and they raced past the turn off\nfor wenatchee and toojk us further into another isolated area to a remote house where\nthey held us eventuially seperated us, had someone steal my truck then show uop\nDRIVING it dem,anding CASH, later they demanded cash also.\nIncident Description\nI WAS ASSAULTED. NO AMBULANCE EVER CAME. ARRESTED ON FALSE CHARGES. TRUCK\nRELEASED TO PASSENGER.\nDeputies lied abnout tow truck name I can prove that also.\nThe tow present and in photos and video was B&T towing of cashmere wa, and that\ncompany was out of business. Further, in the sheriff video Jeremaiah Johnson of Rivercom\nwho effectively is the kidnapper, in legal terms, who dressed in disguise then misled us\nand took us to this property where he and the out of busienss tow truck attempted to\nextort me for cash for a tow / repair, and later for a \"rescue\", Jermeiah admitted to the\nsheriff dfeputy ON VIDEO that he called B&T Towing. TH edeputy was aware yet he falsely\nreported Mountain View Towing was there.\nMy biggest immediate problem I demand answers to are the AI tampered videos.\nSupporting\nPhoto\nDocumentation\nAttachment(s) supporting complaint:\nFile Name Size Date\nAdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27\n3028 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n2947092forensicanalysis\nZachBrunner_202407041759_1310_6764\n3033 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n26832forensicanalysis\nAdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27\n3039 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n294709___unkmnownVERforensicanalysis\nZachBrunner_202407041759_1310_6764\n3033 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n26832forensicanalysis\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 3 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\n12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 4 Of 4\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Chelan-County-Online-Complaint-25-00031.pdf", "filename": "email_Chelan-County-Online-Complaint-25-00031.pdf", "size_mb": 0.48, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.675657", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the above listed\nen\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve status.\nFailure to file the necessary report by 02/28/2025 will result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or termina\u0000on of your\nregistra\u0000on.\nPlease verify the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email address and update as needed.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corps\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/FD7D01CF-0A36-47F6-8FA3-E505BCAE556A.pdf", "filename": "FD7D01CF-0A36-47F6-8FA3-E505BCAE556A.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.570668", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah, and\nalso known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her status\nas an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah, and\nalso known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her status\nas an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed to me\nbut the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong doing\nand expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls contrary to the\nclaim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position that\nyou did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this information.\nTampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts (although\nthis would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting are crimes.\nThere are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and have no ability\nto charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who can charge a\nfelony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on prosecutors and\ngovernments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy, evidence. Certainly,\ndespite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set people up. I just do not\nsee that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several poeple, typically police,\nworking outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not generally a multi-agency\ncoverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple police, a person or persons\nwho can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data there, and the tow truck\ncompany. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and freedom (as these would all\nbe clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I really just do not see that\nhappening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms of evidence, they did not\nbother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial regarding the alleged threats\nthemselves will have to come from their testimony.\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for rivercom\n911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked for\nrivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it doesn\u2019t\ncontain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke to had\nflatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and she\npersisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are\nabsolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively\ndismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this lady\nas a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally laughed\nand said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a trick\nto get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for help.\nThis constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT STANS\nMOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys are LYING\nabout the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s everyone\u2019s\noops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill dispute and\nsubsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and on the\nrecord please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter\nthe timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And\nthe implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but\nyou is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they\nkept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical\nand think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.610656", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Pam Faircloth", "sender_email": "Pam.Faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "publicdisclosure", "recipient_email": "publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org", "date_sent": "Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM", "subject": "Ryan Hell/24-1-00253-04 Hello,", "summary": "Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM\nAttachments: image002.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 1.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 2.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 3.png\nExternal Email Warning! This email originated from outside of Chelan County.", "body": "Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM\nAttachments: image002.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 1.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 2.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 3.png\nExternal Email Warning! This email originated from outside of Chelan County.\nGood Morning Pam,\nHere is the information I can best give you for the attached court order:\nJeremiah Johnson is the Operations Manager of RiverCom 911. Jeremiah began employment in March\n2008 as an Emergency Systems Dispatcher, was promoted to Supervisor in July 2011, then an internal\ntransfer to Radio Systems Technician in June 2017, with his current promotion of Operation Manager in\nJune 2022. Due to Jeremiah\u2019s long standing employment with RiverCom 911, he has a professional\nrelationship with many law enforcement officers but no personal relationships to our knowledge.\nCAD Call logs contain no metadata, RiverCom has confirmed this with the Spillman.\nAttached is the metadata for the 911 audio.\nPlease let me know if you need anything else.\nThank you,\nFrom: Pam Faircloth \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:35 PM\nTo: publicdisclosure \nSubject: Ryan Hell/24-1-00253-04\nHello,\nAttached is the order that we talked about on the phone with regard to what the court ordered our office to\nobtain from your office. As you can see, this order is requesting any additional information on Jeremiah Johnson\u2019s\nemployment with Rivercom and any relationship with law enforcement. The order also states that my office is to\nprovide any metadata with respect to the 911 calls and the CAD log.\nThank you very much for your help.\nPamela L. Faircloth\nParalegal - Felony Division\nChelan County Prosecutors Office\n(509) 667-6659 \u2013 phone\n(509) 667-6490 - fax\npam.faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us\nChelan County blocks all foreign email traffic. If you use Gmail as your email service and I don\u2019t respond to your email in a timely\nmanner, it is highly likely I did not receive your email. Please call me for an alternate way of corresponding.\nConfidentiality Notice: This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. Unless you\nare the intended addressee (or authorized to receive for the intended addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to\nanyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please\nadvise the sender by reply at pam.faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us and delete the message. In addition, all email sent to this\naddress will be received by the Chelan County email system and may be subject to public disclosure and to archiving\nand review.\u201d", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_JohsonsEmploymentStatus-HR-Rivercom.pdf", "filename": "email_JohsonsEmploymentStatus-HR-Rivercom.pdf", "size_mb": 0.41, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.571655", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:34 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that\nany unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies\nof the original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:34 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_RyansResponseToSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_RyansResponseToSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.079649", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "CHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nRYAN MICHAEL HELL \u00a7 Location: Chelan\n\u00a7 Filed on: 07/05/2024\n\u00a7 JIS/SCOMIS Case Number: 24-1-00253-8\n\u00a7 Process or Transaction wa0400000100646167\n\u00a7 Control Number:\n\u00a7\nCASE INFORMATION\nOffense Statute Deg Date Case Type: ADL Criminal Adult\n1.", "body": "CHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nRYAN MICHAEL HELL \u00a7 Location: Chelan\n\u00a7 Filed on: 07/05/2024\n\u00a7 JIS/SCOMIS Case Number: 24-1-00253-8\n\u00a7 Process or Transaction wa0400000100646167\n\u00a7 Control Number:\n\u00a7\nCASE INFORMATION\nOffense Statute Deg Date Case Type: ADL Criminal Adult\n1. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii) Case Flags: Speedy Trial Expiration Date\nBodily Injury\nCount #: 1\n2. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii)\nBodily Injury\n3. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii)\nBodily Injury\nWarrants\nBench Warrant - HELL, RYAN MICHAEL (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E )\n02/24/2025 4:57 PM Sheriff's Return of Bench Warrant\n02/10/2025 11:50 AM Issued Bench Warrant\n02/10/2025 10:44 AM Ordered Bench Warrant\nFine: $0\nBond Set: No Bail\nDATE CASE ASSIGNMENT\nCurrent Case Assignment\nCase Number 24-1-00253-04\nCourt Chelan\nDate Assigned 07/05/2024\nPARTY INFORMATION\nAttorneys\nPlaintiff STATE OF WASHINGTON Munneke, Michael Henry\n(Criminal) 509-667-6202(W)\nDefendant (WIP) HELL, RYAN MICHAEL\nDATE EVENTS & ORDERSOFTHE COURT INDEX\nEVENTS\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance Findings and Order\nIndex # 1\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Probable Cause\nIndex # 2\n07/05/2024 Order Establishing Conditions of Release\nIndex # 3\n07/05/2024 Order for Protection From Civil Harassment\nIndex # 4\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance\nIndex # 5\nPAGE 1 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n07/05/2024 Receipts\nIndex # 6\nCHELAN COUNTY SHERIFF\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Indigency\nIndex # 7.99\n07/05/2024 Report\nIndex # 8.99\nCOURT'S RISK ASSESSMENT\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 9.99\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 10.99\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 11.99\n07/09/2024 Notice of Appearance and Request for Discovery\nIndex # 12\n07/09/2024 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 13\n07/09/2024 Information\nIndex # 14\n07/17/2024 Acknowledgement of Advice of Rights\nIndex # 15\n07/17/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 16\n07/17/2024 Initial Arraignment\nIndex # 17\n07/22/2024 Order\nIndex # 18\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL\n07/22/2024 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 19\n07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 20\n07/29/2024 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 21\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Application of Prosecuting Attorney\nIndex # 22\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Application by Defendant\nIndex # 23\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Hearing\nIndex # 24\n09/23/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 25\n09/23/2024 StatusConference / Hearing\nIndex # 26\n09/30/2024 Hearing Cancelled Plaintiff Prosecution Requested\nIndex # 27\nPAGE 2 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n11/18/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 28\n11/18/2024 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 29\n02/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 30\n02/10/2025 Order Directing Issuance of Bench Warrant\nIndex # 31\n02/10/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 32\n02/10/2025 Bench Warrant Issued Copy Filed\nIndex # 33\n02/24/2025 Sheriffs Return on a Bench Warrant\nIndex # 34\n02/25/2025 Order Setting Bail\nIndex # 35\nPR\nAmount: 0.00\n02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing\nIndex # 36\n02/25/2025 Report\nIndex # 37.99\nCOURT'S RISK ASSESSMENT\n02/27/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 38\n03/05/2025 Attachment\nIndex # 39\nPICTURES PROVIDED BY DEF\n03/05/2025 Order\nIndex # 40\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL AND TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL\n03/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 41\n03/17/2025 Notice of Appearance\nIndex # 42\n03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 43\n03/17/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 44\n04/23/2025 Motion and Affidavit Declaration\nIndex # 45\nTO APPOINT PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR AT PUBLIC EXPENSE\n04/23/2025 Order for Expert Services\nIndex # 46\n05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 47\n05/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 48\n05/28/2025\nPAGE 3 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nMotion\nIndex # 49\nTO PROVIDE DISCOVERY TO CLIENT\n06/02/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 50\n06/02/2025 Motion\nIndex # 51\nTO PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/02/2025 Order\nIndex # 52\nTO DISSEMINATE DISCOVERY\n06/02/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 53\n06/12/2025 Response\nIndex # 54\nSTATE'S TO DEF'S MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/16/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 55\n06/20/2025 Response\nIndex # 56\nDEF'S RE DISCOVERY AND EVIDENCE PRESERVATION\n06/23/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 57\n06/25/2025 Order\nIndex # 58\nON DISCOVERY PRESERVATION AND SPOILATION\n06/27/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 59\n07/07/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 60\n07/08/2025 Declaration Affidavit\nIndex # 61\nGINA HRPCHA\n07/09/2025 States List of Witnesses\nIndex # 62\n07/14/2025 Order\nIndex # 63\nDISQUALIFING COUNSEL\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 64\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 65\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 66\n07/14/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 67\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 68.99\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form Index # 69.99\nPAGE 4 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 70.99\n07/15/2025 Receipts\nIndex # 71\nCHELAN COUNTY SHERIFF\n07/17/2025 Motion and Affidavit Declaration\nIndex # 72\nFOR DISBURSEMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS\n07/17/2025 Order Expending Public Funds\nIndex # 73\n07/23/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 74\n08/20/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 75\n08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 76\n08/27/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 77\n11/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 78\n11/05/2025 Motion\nIndex # 79\nPRO SE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE & DISMISS\n11/10/2025 Order\nIndex # 80\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL\n11/10/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 81\nHEARINGS\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance (4:00 PM)\n07/17/2024 Arraignment and Trial Setting (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/05/2024 Order Establishing Conditions of Release\n07/22/2024 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nDISQUALIFICATION OF COUNSEL\n07/29/2024 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRE: COUNSEL\nEvents: 07/22/2024 Motion Hearing\n08/26/2024 CANCELED Omnibus (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nContinuance\n09/04/2024 Omnibus (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\n09/23/2024 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\n09/30/2024 CANCELED Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nStricken\nPAGE 5 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n10/08/2024 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nStricken\n11/18/2024 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM)\nEvents: 09/23/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n12/02/2024 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nContinuance\n02/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 11/18/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n02/10/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 02/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n02/18/2025 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nStricken\n02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing (4:00 PM)\n03/05/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nEvents: 02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing\n03/17/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nEvents: 03/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n05/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n05/20/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n06/02/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRELEASE OF DISVOERY/PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/16/2025 CANCELED No Contact Order (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRE-ENTRY\nDuplicate Hearing\n06/16/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nTO PRESERVE EVIDENCE/RE-ENTRY OF NCO\nEvents: 06/02/2025 Motion Hearing\n06/23/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE\nEvents: 06/16/2025 Motion Hearing\n07/07/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n07/14/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nEvents: 07/07/2025 Motion Hearing\n07/22/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n07/23/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nEvents: 07/14/2025 Motion Hearing\nPAGE 6 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n08/20/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/23/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n08/27/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 08/20/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n11/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n11/10/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 11/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n11/17/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nRE: COUNSEL\n11/18/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nDATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION\nAttorney ESWORTHY, SEAN\nTotal Charges 25.00\nTotal Payments and Credits 25.00\nBalance Due as of 11/14/2025 0.00\nDefendant (WIP) HELL, RYAN MICHAEL\nTotal Charges 5.00\nTotal Payments and Credits 5.00\nBalance Due as of 11/14/2025 0.00\nPAGE 7 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_CaseSummaryChelanClerk24-1-00253-04.pdf", "filename": "email_CaseSummaryChelanClerk24-1-00253-04.pdf", "size_mb": 0.35, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.796646", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated\nthe threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this\nseems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since\nthe alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make\nthat they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_shawnEstworthy.pdf", "filename": "email_shawnEstworthy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.526655", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Johnsons911-CAD-24C06401.pdf", "filename": "email_Johnsons911-CAD-24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.857647", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file this into the record Sean,", "summary": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford.", "body": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford. Help with\nher shopping, her chores, shopping, laundry and her dogs which i am helping her train. I have told Juystin during the\nfirst week, in a hearing at the courthouse, I requested access to ask the court for provisions for mrs Hrpcha and Titus\ninformed me that he didnt see her listed as a \"witness\", therefor there was no problem at that time with mrs Hrpcha\nbeing in contact with me.\nMy concern now would be restrictions on communication with mrs Hrpcha, if I add her as a witness. Obviously\nthis is a matter with importance since I generally see Mrs Hrpcha every day and she is in fact going to be driving me to\ncourt on monday.\nWhat are your thoughts?\nThank you\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:49 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nAlright, I can file it into the court file and provide it as discovery to the prosecutor.\nHowever, if the case proceeds to trial, the court the court will want live testimony from fact witnesses.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:19 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file this into the record\nSean,\nUntil otherwise informed, I am still reliant on you and need you to file this onto the record into evidence please.\nThank you.\nGmail - Re: Please file this into the record 1/3/26, 12:15 PM\nStatement, voluntary, from passenger Gina\nDisability certification, for passenger Gina", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.112650", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Regarding your prior experience and my declaration; when we talked you said you didn\u2019t notice any crime as Jana as she\nis named, made threats to slap the shit out of me on the video which has now been removed from what I have. I asked if you heard that and reminded it.", "body": "Regarding your prior experience and my declaration; when we talked you said you didn\u2019t notice any crime as Jana as she\nis named, made threats to slap the shit out of me on the video which has now been removed from what I have.\nI asked if you heard that and reminded it. You said yes and didn\u2019t seem interested. I asked what your background was if\nyou ever dealt with a felony harassment case or were familiar with the legal constructs of the law which outline\nrequirements and you. Said vaguely and I said the requirement is that the victim is genuinely and legitimately afraid and\nthat conduct of hurling insults and threats of bodily harm to me as Jana clearly did in the video we watched at your\noffice; that\u2019s not conducive to someone who is afraid of someone: to behave in such a way as JANA was showed she\nwas not in any fear. That\u2019s when I explored your experience and knowledge of the relevant law with a couple preliminary\nquestions and you told me you mostly do dui and have never dealt with a felony harassment. That\u2019s all I was conveying\nand it isn\u2019t to insult anyone.\nSean I haven\u2019t done anything unreasonable here and you know this. This alleged crime has been tailored to stick to me\neven though I never committed it. It failed to provide the video proof. And they continue to shape things.\nWhat do they want me to rot in jail for? Ed Murray! I didn\u2019t do anything wrong I simply talked about something which is\nillegal and horrible and they are retaliating to silence me. Other than that why are they railroading me for this.\nAnd why is my passenger not listed in any court papers! I sense grave harm is coming her way and they hid her from the\nrecord to avoid a lawsuit.\nNeither of us want to file a lawsuit. But they kidnapped me then assaulted me and they are trying to put me in prison for\nthis. I am innocent absolutely innocent.\nYou have any suggestions? Or am I supposed to quietly go to a mock trial full of doctored evidence and lying officials\nwho were engaged in a kidnapping scheme for Sally Bagshaw?\nI would be willing to sign a gag order and not release records and move out of state if they will let me. I didn\u2019t know they\nwere this violently trying to harm me!? How psychotic of them what wackos.\nAnd Jeremiah\u2019s wife not working for Rivercom is not true. Perhaps now. I personally have witnessed her entering\nRivercom. So was she fired from there and if so was it over this incident?\nJeremiah surely doesn\u2019t expect to be allowed to commit this crime unchecked does he? Because the fCC and homeland\nsecurity are very interested in the incident since it obstructed life saving 911 service and involved them.\nI just want to be done with this and move. What can I do\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 5:03 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nThey sent me the recording and I have uploaded it the Dropbox.\nThe State provided some other items as well, one which does confirm that Jeremiah Johnson is the\noperations manager.\nThere is a second public records request response which indicates that Jana Johnson does not work\nfor RiverCom.\nYour statement was something more along the lines that I was only a DUI attorney, and either explicitly\nor implicitly said that I did not do felony cases, which is not accurate. You talked throughout much of\nthe video playback, and I certainly may have mentioned doing DUI cases at some point, but I really do\nnot see how that is neither here nor there. I have been on the felony conflict panel for years.\nIn order to be able to move forward on this case, unless there is actual, solid evidence of some larger\nconspiracy, am going to take the case as it is presented. I have already outlined this in a previous e-\nmail and until there is something that would be able to convince a jury otherwise, pursuing what I\ncurrently view as an outlandish defense is a lost cause.\nA possible defense in a similar vein is that you believed this all to be the case, whether or not the facts\nare there to back it up. We would probably need an expert witness to pursue that, however.\nBob can certainly reach out to Gina if she has a phone number.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 2:29 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Clarification on council request history\nOk perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the\nrecord that they are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too\nand would surprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun\npoint onnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this\nwoman who is disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury\nme after they did all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in\nthe face for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager\nand their license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned.\nEver. So far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured\nthey have the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge\npossibly moved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and\nI reluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not\nlying at all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court,\nand it creates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely\ninaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why\nI missed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges\nand the judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes\nto that question. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_2.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.997648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.", "body": "Gmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRyan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a\nconflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit\nmurder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask\nyou to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect\neveryone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of\nJuly for them. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was\nintroduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the\nStenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get\nher formal name. MOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL\nPROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of\nbecome a political target OF; SALLY BAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What\nis more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by\nthe alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t\nmean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and\nthe incidents here are only indicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July\n4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service\naside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in\ntheir pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000.\nI reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my\ntruck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill.\nRyan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed\nand texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at\nleast 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with\nsome preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a\nproper working email. I have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail\nand clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades. I have been proactive in\nobtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing\ncourt clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had\nconcerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did\nnot reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time\nearlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on\n911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside assistance for the\nflat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and\nrun my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products throughout the state, for 7 years\nwhile attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I\nrespect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after\ntactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do\nme and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I\nwill present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court.\nAgain I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs\nby judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth\nworks and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events\nnamely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations\n1 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nhad been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount of\nthis eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful\ninventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he was in fact every\nbit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and\nhe moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle. Accusations came out and Murray denied\nthem. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us\nwho had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong\nwill the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that\nplaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot\nof us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only\nsaid Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the\ncase is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I\nsimply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray\nlies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this apply to our case? In the incident,\nas I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were\ngonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed onsite. I then heard a woman\nfrantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go\nnow just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing she was yet another piece\nof evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a\ncareer politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a\nsenior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she\nhad aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers\npresented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to\nkeep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach,\nprobably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed\nMurray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a\ndisgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy\ncreating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express\nstimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even\nmafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express\nour intended message. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between\nsome things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my\nname tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by\nprofessional contractors. That FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat\nunfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work\nwalking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She\nwas robbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They\nnever caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019.\nI\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a\ndesert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and photos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we\nenjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had\nmy own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting\nvisitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all.\nAbsolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my\nlicense plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it.\nThen Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to\ntry to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and\nshe is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since\n2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a\nformer SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate\nfor me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the\nway the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\n2 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\n[Quoted text hidden]\n4 attachments\n3 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg\n53K\n527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-D3D164A07FFC.jpeg\n54K\nIMG_6448.jpeg\n1435K\nIMG_6452.jpeg\n3778K\n4 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/Gmail_-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "size_mb": 5.72, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.844671", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated\nthe threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this\nseems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since\nthe alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make\nthat they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/shawnEstworthy.pdf", "filename": "shawnEstworthy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.789670", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/heidi.pdf", "filename": "heidi.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.863671", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to\njustice for her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been\nrushed to critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a\ncoalition of grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me,\nand that this is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my\nown civil rights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne.pdf", "filename": "email_BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.356641", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer.", "body": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the\nrecord that they are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too\nand would surprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun\npoint onnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this\nwoman who is disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury\nme after they did all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in\nthe face for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager\nand their license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned.\nEver. So far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured\nthey have the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge\npossibly moved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and\nI reluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not\nlying at all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court,\nand it creates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely\ninaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why\nI missed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges\nand the judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes\nto that question. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.458654", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: State's response to motion\n1 message\nRyan Hell Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1.", "body": "Gmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: State's response to motion\n1 message\nRyan Hell Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged\nand confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any\nunauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies of\nthe original message.\n1 of 1 1/24/26, 2:31 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_BradyMotionRequest-SeanEstworthy-June-16-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_BradyMotionRequest-SeanEstworthy-June-16-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.045649", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_heidi.pdf", "filename": "email_heidi.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.650656", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nTotal Number of Redactions in Document: 1\nRedaction Reasons by Page\nPage Reason Description Occurrences\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security\nnumbers credit card numbers or bank or\nother financial account numbers except\nwhen disclosure is expressly required by\nor governed by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\nPersonal chapter. \u201cOther financial account\n1 1\nInformation numbers\u201d applies to information such as\nsocial security numbers (as defined in\nRCW 9.35.005). Specific investigative\nrecords compiled by law enforcement\nagencies the nondisclosure is essential for\nthe protection of any person\u2019s right to\nprivacy. Disclosure of social security\nnumbers would be highly offensive to a\nreasonable person and is not of legitimate\nconcern to the public.\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nRedaction Reasons by Exemption\nPages\nReason Description\n(Count)\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security numbers\ncredit card numbers or bank or other\nfinancial account numbers except when\ndisclosure is expressly required by or\ngoverned by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\n1(1)\nPersonal Information chapter. \u201cOther financial account numbers\u201d\napplies to information such as social\nsecurity numbers (as defined in RCW\n9.35.005). Specific investigative records\ncompiled by law enforcement agencies the\nnondisclosure is essential for the protection\nof any person\u2019s right to privacy. Disclosure\nof social security numbers would be highly\noffensive to a reasonable person and is not\nof legitimate concern to the public.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/24C06401_R.pdf", "filename": "24C06401_R.pdf", "size_mb": 0.21, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.424666", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "hotline@fcc.gov", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nChelan County Wa State: Egregious 911 Abuse and Cover Up\nRyan Hell Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM\nTo: \nMy name is Ryan Hell. My DoB is 01-09-1978.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nChelan County Wa State: Egregious 911 Abuse and Cover Up\nRyan Hell Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM\nTo: \nMy name is Ryan Hell. My DoB is 01-09-1978.\nI live in Seattle Washington.\nI am writing to inform you and desperately seek some injunction to stop the false prosecution of me, in light of a\nmountain of evidence of operational misconductuct and mal;feasence which namely, as it were;\nA CRIMINAL SCHEME TO KIDNAP AND MURDER ME DURING AN EMERGENCY CALL FOR URGENT LIFE SAVING\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE.\nI WAS KIDNAPPED BY CORUPT DISPATCHERS ON JULY 4th 2024 in Chelan County Wa State. They denied ambulance\noffered personal ride then OPERATION MANAGER took us to his personal home and had me assauklted and demanded\n1000 dollars cash for a non existant and unauthorized tow or repair of my truck; then later as seen in their video\nevidedence they demanded 1000 themselves saying\" this is for us. For savcing your life\"\nMassive cover up. They are attemotuhg to railroad me thru court with corrupt pubvlic defese and judges to disappear\nand silence me..,\nIMMEDIATE EM ERGENCY FEDERAL ASSISTANCE NEED}ED\nThis occured on July 4th 2024. The location was Malaga Wa, in Chelan County, the center part of Washingt State.\nOverview of Incident:\na friend and I had planned for some time to go camping with her dogs. As Juy 4th settled closer, we opted for a trip ion\nthat day, and packed our gear and took off in my 2007 F150 pickup. Fully licensed and current tabs and tags, as well as\na fishing license and state park pass. We drove to Wenatchee then up into the overlooking bluffs as I wanted to get\nphotos of a solar event and I did so. The following day it was decided to see if this remote park complex, largely known\nlocally as the Colockum Wildlife Park. There was a Wa State Discovery welcome board at the entrance which stated\nsome basic rules which we carefully examined and agreed we were in full compliance with. Dogs were allowed. So was\novernight up to three nights. Rules said obviosu thinhgs lkike Dont litter no fires/fireworks. Got it and totally ok with it.\nWe even left our cook gear ay storage to avoid any misunderstanding if they should stop or there was a fire in an area\nwe went to.\nJuly 4th\nWe used Google maps to route home now. Maps provided a passage route thropuh and beyond which would being us\nclose to or onto Blewitt Pass, with which we could get back to seattle.\nSometime during the early day my passenger, a disabled elderly woman named Gina Hrpcha; who has serious diabetic\nissues i now know/... informs me she forgot her insulin. We are inside this park network with no cell service.\nMaps was wrong. In fact it is a well known issue among locals according to many locals yet the issue remained and it\ncaught us totally off guard.\nWith the flat tire spare, I nursed my truck at a slow pace, desperately attempting to get this poor woman to services in\norder to get her to help, as her condition degraded quickly as the heat was severe and we had exhausted all water and\nfood now. She was falling asleep\nWe continued as though it went thru noty yet aware it dead ended. Upon being forced to stop I realize I had a flat tire.\nMy spare is also flat, I discover. I put the spare on though, since tire seemed fine and likey broke bead on a deep rut on\nthis rough gravel off road.\nMy passenger is well into diabetic shock or insulin coma now, and only intermittently wakes up. I am frantically\nscreaming to wake her up. I get about 20 miles; I estimate to within about 4 miles of paved roads... and I am completely\nstuck. The physical exertion involved in the ordeal thus far was framatic and I suspect I had a mild stroke, as I have in\nthe past., I realize as it is July 4th I am dealing with a urgent matter and must get help before its too late for us.\nI called 911 and was greeted on phone with rude WHAT DO YOU WANT RYAN?. I was dumbfounded. I explain the\nemergency and express urgency and the dispatcher callously says \"oh well, youre on your owm\". She argues with me for\napproximately 1/2 hour until I BEG her not to let this woman die; I said I know they are after me for political reasons\nbiut the woman is no part of it/ She has kids and grandkids, people will be devastated. I begged them,to rescue her if\nanything/\nEventuallu the dispatcher says she will make some calls. She ask me first \"wat year is uour truck and is it paid for?\" I\nimmediately recognized the mechanisms of a highway robbery type coercion towards road servuce amd I notified her\nVERY CLEAR; I DO NOT NEED A MECHANIC I DO NOT NEED A TOW! I NEED AN AMBULANC!!!! MAM PLEASE\nThe dispatcher then said \"well I dont have an ambulance but I can get your truck towed and you guys wiill be closer to a\nhospital;\". I said this is ludicrous. She saiud take it or leave it. Essentiallu.\nI flatly insisted NOBODY is working on my truck. It just needs air in the tire She went back and forth a half dozen times\nwasting more precious time, exhaustiung me then finally agreed that she heard me amd repeated that she understoof\ntjay I did not consent to any work or tow of my truck. She then said she had a citiy councilman and a orchards employee\nwho could come pick us up.\nThe promise was to drive us to a personal residence where a ambulance would wait for us.\nANOTHER hour goes by and a GMC pickup pulls up man and woman inside. We are grateful to be picked up and offered\nwater/ Keep in mind this is a one way VERY REMOTE and VERY isolated gravel road. We didnt see anyone other than\nthje park workers/\nThese two people drive us up the gravel; tp main road. During the trip I asked politely WHO they are. They ignored me\ncausing me some concern\nThe female takes a call and I hear her mentioning us to someone on the phone. I quietly asked the male who she was\ntalking to, hoping it was the ambulance. He said ite was her work...that she was a DISPATCHER. He claimed he was a\nfireman. Later he admitted he wqs a DISPATCHER also. And later yet I discovered on my OWN; Jeremiah Johnson IS in\nfact, the OPERATIONS CENTER MANAGER at RIVERCOM 911 A PSAP located in Chelan County Washington state and\nservbicng as he exclusive 911 center for Chelan and Douglas counmties in our state; a large territory.\n(Rivercom as I learned; is a private PSAP municipality. Supposeldy or boarded / chaired by politicos and or justices\netc. They keep that hidden though)\nAt the house they take us to I see rrigjt away there is no service on my phone nor my passengers. THIS CONCERNS\nME gravely. I see multiple peop;e tjhere freely using their cell phones and suspect foul play with radio interference.\nGiven what I since learned about Jeremiah Johnson's career I can see a strong likelihgood he jammed our phones.\nWhile there a woman was introduced, oddly three seperate times; as Jeremiah JHohnsons MOTHER. I knew it was\nunlikely but kept it secret, as my distrust for this rescue has bal;loned to sheer panic.\nAt NO TIME did anyone take my passengers vitals or assess her in any way, not even the slightest. This was another\nmassive red flag.\nI asked again and again periodically; where is the ambulance and they never had the same answer just kept lyying said\nit was on the way, they arent sure, it got lost etc etc.\nApproximately one hour into this Jeremiah ask me to go outside so I follow him. There in the long gravel driveway of\nthis very isolated, essentially desert canyon home; is my pickup with an unknown man driving it. Behind my truck still\ncoming down the road a way backl was a RED tow truck which carried an ATV.\nimage.png\nThe Red Tow truck stopped and I immediately filmed to ensure they did not lie and claim they TOWED my truck. I\ncaptured photos of the atv on back and they quickly tried to unload it while others pulled the red hummer fire truck to\nobscure my field of view I suspect. At any rate I was faster. And they are not claiming to have towed my vehicle best I\nknow. (FYI the red hummer was utilized fraudulently also I suspect. It is a first gen military type, and has normal civilian\nplates. I was informed its merely a parade truck. Yet they deployed it for effect by driving it up in front of me with the\nRED ONLY overhead light light bar flashing. Then multiple people adjopined wearing what I immeidately recognized as a\nknockoff city employee uniforms. In the case of Webnatchee its long been known that scammers will utilize\n\"Wenatchee\" shirts with a apple silhouette and it is incredibly similar to official CITY OF WENATCHEE attire the officials\nwear except it does not say \"CITY of..\" it just says Wenatchee\". In the video evidence I am heard addrssinf this.\nWhat occured in fact; without my knowledge or permission and totally against my explicit and repeated DIRECTIVES:\nTHEY STOLE MY VEHICLE.\nJeremiah had apparently communicated with Jerewmiah Johnson to determine year and make then secretly drove to my\ntruck after we were picked up and off waiting for the ambulance.\nThis man demanded 1000 dollars an even number. I know the state law requiores tow operators to register their fees\nwith our state capitol each year. And the idea he randmkly hiut 1000 dollars is ABSURD. I first said THANK YOU.\nSincerely. My hope is to get my injured passenger into my rig, abnd quietly get the hell down the road from this corrupt\ncircus before they freak out and murder us, because i am WELL aware of every. single con they are playing. I worked as\na commercial construction super in the northjeats NY, JErsey, Delaware, MAryland and Florida. I dealt with 100's of\ncorrupt inspectors who put their greedy hands out and did all sorts o\\f shameful crap to try to make an extra buck. I\nseen this all well away and played it cool, acted like i was a fool hoping to pay and leave then contest with visa later.\nThe tow man said no cards allowed. CASH ONLY which illegal in our state. I then thought of a clever way to send a signal\nfor sos to loved ones; I requested access to a phone to call nearby family who would bring cash. Then for no reason they\nvery flatly refused that as well. At that point i was in grave grave danger. They took my truck and wouldnt take payment.\nI then requested documentation or some sort of invoice. They smiled and said there isn't one nor will there be. This\nisn't an impound we are TAKING your truck. I was genuinely confused. I am face to face at this time and being serious\nand polite and gracious; these men are denying me means to make payment and my passenger at this time has now\nbeen away out of site over an hour while they shake. e down. I am desperately concerned for her and aware she is also\nin danger should they attack me to murder me.\nI decide to tell them I have family waiting for us down the road. This lie is one major reason I lived to escape these\nevents that day. During this phase I informed them that I am aware of this being an illegal operation. They yelled at me\nand called me names. I stated that they have clearly interfered with a duress call via 911. That they stole my truck. They\nlikely will face kidnap and extortion charges. They laughed and said I wont live to tell about it. I screamed for Gina my\npassenger she couldnt hear me I guess but I thought she was dead. I am standing there and Jeremiahhs wife Jena runs\nover and punches me in the face with a closed fist. Out of nowjhere., Almsit knocks me out. I stumble and knew\nIMMEDIATELY it was a setup to shoot me and kill me them claim self defense. The tow driver throws my keys down then\nsays he is done/\nJeremuah quickly snatched my keys and says i aint giving your truck backbag now get off my property before I shoot\nyour ass. I see his hand in his back; I beg for my passenger, plead for these people to calm down. Female is laughing at\nme spits on me. Jeeremiah keeps the threats saying leave now. They telll me the passenger is with them now. I asked\nthem to PLEAE get her so I can verify she is ok and wants me to leave. They REFUSE to!\nI immediately see a sketchy situatio where I could be pinned with her murder if i. leave her there and go alone. I STATE\nthat ....and I stay./ They call 911 report that I made threats to leave get a gun come bacl, some type of feloy threats.\nDuring the 45 minutes or so it tool deputi4s to arrive; I hear a woman yell \"WHERE IS RYAN?! I CANT :LET RYAN SEE\nME\". Nobnody know me there or anywhere. I dont have any enemies I know of...well corrupt poloticiasn I exposed in\n2017...YES. But I ran to see WHO she was. With 1% battery on my phone i ready it...and I snap about a dozen photos of\nthe woman fleeing.,. they told her again. \"HURRY, yiou have to go the sherifs deputies wont come on the property while\nyou are on it\".\nThis woman was 20 YEAR veteran CHIEF prosecutor in Seattle / King County, her name is Sally Bagshaw. She was most\nrecently City Councilwoman in 2017 when I heloed the seattle times investigators uncover former Seattle Mayor Ed\nMurrays cps scandal where a custody CPS judge found gold in 1984 for murray molesting his own foster son. This\napparently angered powerful peoople because my innocent wife at the time, Jacika Akter, who was a TSO wiuth TSA at\nSeatac; was robbed at gun point and chased into the hiway and nearly hit by bus. The police ated amused about that\nand the incident prompted our move to philadelphia and nyc. Where nothing like these thiungs happened untiul I moved\nhome a few years ago.... and the gand stalking all started over. Ive been assailted multiuple times nearly murdered many\ntimes. I plan on leaving after this.\nThe arrest was excessive and violent and WILD. They staged a shooting making me move a lot while yelling threats at\nme and saying \"put tsown the gun!\" and \"he has a gun\"... that sort of dialogue wwnr on for 20 minutes or so. I had\nnothing in my hands, beggerf for my life. They listened when i claimed they were being setup to kill a political target and\nthey would be sold out and arrested for lt.\nThe county took almost a YEAR to let me see video evidence. Its all been HEAVILY doctored. You can see the video\nanomalies that indicate they alrtewered it. Its likelu easy to see. Thjey also bulldozed a MOTION I presented A PROPER\nMOTION, to PRESERVE FORENSICS evidence. The prosecutor had nearly fallen out of his chair when he seen it, he\naske me directkly to with draw it. I siad sorry. They continued for two weeks then dismissed the motion after\nbasicalluy RAILROADING my merits which were sound.\nI have an evidence site up at www.ryanhellfiles.com\nBe aware the PSAP Rivercom is privately owned and they are terrified of accountability.\nALSOL: please be aware these people have LIKELY been engaged in similar activity and have cold cases mounting which\nmy case will expose.\nMY LIFE IS IN IMMEDIATE DANGER\nEvolving / WiP EVIDENCE STACK\nwww.ryanhellfiles.com\nRyan Hell - Seattle Wa 98144\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nI had no legal grounds to refuse that help. So I consented to accepting a ride.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Chelan_County_Wa_State-_Egregious_911_Abuse_and_Cover_Up.pdf", "filename": "email_Chelan_County_Wa_State-_Egregious_911_Abuse_and_Cover_Up.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.633644", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in part\nfor that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing videos\nwhere you told me you were a DUI lawyer.", "body": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in part\nfor that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing videos\nwhere you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the record that\nthey are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too and would\nsurprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun point\nonnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this woman who\nis disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury me after they\ndid all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in the\nface for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager and\ntheir license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned. Ever.\nSo far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured they\nhave the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge possibly\nmoved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and I\nreluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not lying\nat all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court, and it\ncreates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely inaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why I\nmissed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges and\nthe judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes to that\nquestion. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_3.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_3.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.363653", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:33 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:33 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email. This is an unmonitored account.\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Please save your record\nnumber for tracking. Your record number is: 634919-FZK.\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still\nexperiencing physical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911\nand contact the police.\nWhat to Expect\n1. We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil\nrights violations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your\nreport.\n2. Our specialists determine the next steps\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the\nJustice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report.\nIf so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your\nreport and will recommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid\norganization.\n3. When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not\nalways be able to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you\nprovided in this report. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you\nneed to reach us about your report, please refer to your report number when contacting\nus. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat You Can Do Next\n1. Contact local legal aid organizations or a\nlawyer if you haven\u2019t already.\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help\nyou with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices),to help you find a legal aid\nlawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2. Learn More\nVisit civilrights.justice.gov to learn more about your rights and see examples of\nviolations we handle.\nPlease Note: Each week, we receive hundreds of reports of potential violations. We\ncollect and analyze this information to help us select cases, and we may use this\ninformation as evidence in an existing case. We will review your letter to decide\nwhether it is necessary to contact you for additional information. We do not have the\nresources to follow-up on every letter.\nContact\ncivilrights.justice.gov U.S. Department of (202) 514-3847\nJustice 1-855-856-1247 (toll-free)\nCivil Rights Division Telephone Device for the\n950 Pennsylvania Deaf\nAvenue, NW (TTY) (202) 514-0716\nWashington, D.C.\n20530-0001\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division.pdf", "filename": "email_Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.792658", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF CHELAN\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON, ) CASE NO: 24-1-00253-04\n` Plaintiff, )\n) DEFENDANT'S PRO SE\n) EMERGENCY MOTION TO\nv. ) EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND DISMISS FOR\n) OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT\nRyan Hell, )\nDefendant.", "body": "SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF CHELAN\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON, ) CASE NO: 24-1-00253-04\n` Plaintiff, )\n) DEFENDANT'S PRO SE\n) EMERGENCY MOTION TO\nv. ) EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND DISMISS FOR\n) OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT\nRyan Hell, )\nDefendant. )\n__________________________________ )\nI. INTRODUCTION\nCOMES NOW the Defendant, Ryan Hell, acting Pro Se, and moves this Honorable\nCourt for an order:\n1) Excluding the State\u2019s video evidence, and\n2) Dismissing the charges with prejudice based on documented **Outrageous\nGovernment Conduct (OGC)** and the systematic **Spoliation of Evidence**, in\nviolation of the Defendant\u2019s due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth\nAmendments to the U.S. Constitution.\nII. STATEMENT OF FACTS SUPPORTING MOTION\nThe State's prosecution is fundamentally compromised by a demonstrable pattern of\nofficial fraud and misconduct, including the fabrication of official records and the\nprovision of forensically tampered video evidence. The State\u2019s continued reliance on\nthis compromised evidence constitutes a violation of the constitutional standard for\nOutrageous Government Conduct.\nIII. GROUND I: FABRICATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (OUTRAGEOUS\nGOVERNMENT CONDUCT) The State has relied upon a false narrative and fabricated\ndocumentation, evidenced by:\nA. Falsification of Towing Records (Official Narrative vs. Documented Fact) Official\nreports and summaries falsely allege that the tow company used or called to the scene\nwas **Mountain View Towing**. The Defendant has established that the actual company\npresent was **B&T Tow Company, e.g., B&T Towing]**, and that the claim regarding\nMountain View Towing is a **deliberate fabrication of fact** within the official records,\nmanufacturing a false basis for prosecution.\nB. Alteration of the CAD Report The police Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) file was\nallegedly altered, changing the nature of the initial emergency call from a medical event\n(**\u201cstroke\u201d**) to a minor property event (**\u201cflat tire\u201d**). This alteration constitutes a willful\nact to manufacture a justification for subsequent police intervention and criminal\ncharges.\nIV. GROUND II: SYSTEMATIC SPOLIATION AND TAMPERING OF VIDEO EVIDENCE\nThe State\u2019s video evidence is forensically unsound and demonstrates a willful,\nsystematic attempt to conceal its manipulation across multiple files.\nA. Concealment of Modification History (Primary Video) The file\u2019s metadata (File:\n**20240704_173916.mp4**) shows the **CreateDate** and **ModifyDate** are\n**identical** (**2024:07:05 00:40:06**), despite the file being disclosed almost 12\nmonths later. This is conclusive evidence that the file\u2019s modification history was\n**deliberately stripped or reset** to conceal processing, which constitutes **Spoliation of\nEvidence.**\nB. Evidence of Concealed Timestamp and Processing (Dash Cam Video) The police\ndash cam video evidence has its time stamp **zeroed out** and indicates it was\nrendered using **FFmpeg** format. Stripping the time stamp conceals the crucial time\nof recording, and FFmpeg is a third-party multimedia framework used for complex\nediting and transcoding, not a native camera output.\nC. Evidence of Advanced Digital Manipulation Tags The primary video file contains the\n**`VideoHandle`** tag, a component associated with 3D rendering and scene\nmanipulation libraries (e.g., videohandles.github.io), and a **non-standard 30.119\nFPS**, all of which demonstrate that the video was subjected to **advanced,\ncontent-altering manipulation.**\nConclusion: The systematic concealment of modification history and the documented\nuse of manipulation tools across multiple files constitutes **Spoliation of Evidence** and\nrenders all video evidence unreliable and inadmissible.\nV. RELIEF REQUESTED\nWHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to order:\n1. **Exclusion** of all video evidence provided by the State.\n2. **Dismissal** of all charges with prejudice based on the documented, systematic\npattern of **Outrageous Government Conduct** (CAD file alteration, tow company lie,\nevidence tampering) which violates the Defendant's constitutional right to due process.\n3. **Scheduling** an evidentiary hearing to receive testimony regarding the documented\nspoliation of evidence.\nDated this 5th day of November, 2025.\n___________________________________\nRyan Hell,, Defendant Pro Se\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/motionToDismiss_RyanHellChelanCounty.pdf", "filename": "motionToDismiss_RyanHellChelanCounty.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.397665", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell", "recipient_email": "JMS_HELL@yahoo.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm.", "body": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm. Thank you.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:49 AM wrote:\nDEAR RYAN:\nSorry for the delay. It\u2019s been a rather hectic week.\nYour next court hearing is August 20 at 9:30 a.m. The judge authorized you to appear via Zoom for this hearing.\nAre you available today at around 3:00 p.m. to have a teleconference to discuss your case?\nSincerely,\nBrian Chase\nLaw Offices of Brian Chase, PLLC\n7 E Street S.E.\nQuincy, WA 98848\n(509) 787-9000\n(F) (509) 787-9040\nNOTICE:\nThis electronic communication and any attachments may contain privileged or other confidential information and\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nremain for the sole use of the named addressee, who is the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use,\ndisclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply email\nand immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments without copying, transmitting, or\ndisclosing the contents. Thank you.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:23 PM\nTo: Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell \nSubject: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304\nGood morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for\nme to appear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to\ngo over the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all\ncouncils assigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to\ncite formally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a\nyear.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record,\nabout the urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD\nfile though and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the\npark.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the\ntime of alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she\nmade to conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd\nrescue with these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work\nthe 911 centers They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know\nbetter than that. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other\ncommon sense stuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering\nsimple critical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and\n\u201cwhy didn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and\nfederal relief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail\nof sloppy cover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty\nattempt to cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and there\nhave been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel, presumably\nunder some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom 911. I\u2019ve been lied\nto on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse to consult for over 9\nmonths. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his office. When I arrived to\nwatch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces of video that would put the\nprosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy scrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names threatening\nto assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again and get them to\nintervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone\nand say \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow operator\nsaid \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s free to go\nby me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false but entirely\ninflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty maddening. Because I\nnot only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed as they destroyed my\ntransmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over 2900 all said on that.\nAnd I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER investigations\ninto Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then settled lawsuit\nan ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king county medical\nexaminers. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s evidence\nof needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to us.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were\nnot allowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding\nirreversible irreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911\ncalls; and also I think one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the\nspoilation of my voice audio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her\nto not let my passenger die. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council\nmember then Jeremiah shows up, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website.\nLook around the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made\nregarding dispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can murder\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nme but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can block me\naway then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case\n2 attachments\n07-05-24 24C06401 Hell Ryan Report.pdf\n1623K\nID#8385903208920250714161223.pdf\n991K", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.550643", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=\u2026=msg-f:1831672489715170539&simpl=msg-f:1831672489715170539&mb=1 Page 1 of 5", "summary": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.712645", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to\njustice for her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been\nrushed to critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a\ncoalition of grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me,\nand that this is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my\nown civil rights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne.pdf", "filename": "BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T02:29:55.777432", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged\nand confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any\nunauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies of\nthe original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/SeansBradyResponseAndOopsIforgotSomeVideos-June-16-2025.pdf", "filename": "SeansBradyResponseAndOopsIforgotSomeVideos-June-16-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:46.542227", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of company\nand home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled B&T of\ncashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving behind my\npickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man eventually\nsurrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and he\nadmitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on and\naired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As it\nwas, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down the\nrabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal residence\u201d. I\ncan\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the mountain\nof discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is the\nfact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non rivercom\nnon CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and commit murder.\nNone of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t seeing what\u2019s\nclearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any moral\nreason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s really\ndumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner campaign\ncontributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he ADOPTED\nthen molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected, there\u2019s been much\nconvo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the office of Seattle mayor?\nCome on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being silenced like this then let\u2019s note\nthat.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly criminal\nactions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure that\naccountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better things\nto do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and constitutional\nrights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence was tampered.\nAnd most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was conspired by\nJeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom operations and\ntechnology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and Wenatchee fire.\nWa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich programmatically\nshould have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t get\nit. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified of\nme roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice to\nshare it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not only\nmake a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_RE-_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "email_RE-_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.384653", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified\nof me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice\nto share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not\nonly make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/docs/email_Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.569643", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important", "summary": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...", "body": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\n2 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\n3 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to\ncome view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was\nfloored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on\nvideo. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other\nthan to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n4 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/genericWeCantHelpYouResponseWSBA_May-9-2025.pdf", "filename": "genericWeCantHelpYouResponseWSBA_May-9-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:38.272136", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/24C06401.pdf", "filename": "24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:47", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A.", "body": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A. 46. 020. 2bii Felony Harassment Threats to Kill.\nDuring my intersctiona with Ryan I took notice of how at ti-11 he appeared to be\nparanoid and had rapid speech. He seemed to believe things such H how people\nwere after him and wanted to kill hi111.\nSgt, Musgrove obtained a signed written statement from\n( 1. Although I will transcribe these stateNnt in\nJlt'J\nnarrative to the\nbest of my ability, please review their written statement as a part of your\nreview of this case.\n\"Mid day on 7-4-24 I learned of a stranded motorist on Colockum Paas Rd, which\nis not tar my residence. I went to help the stranded 1110tori11ts as one of\nthem was diabetic and waa not feeling well. Upon arrival, the male and female\nboth looked very hot, and the fensle was not feeling well. I told both of them\nwho I waa and that I waa a volunteer firefighter and was offering to take them\nback to my place, out of the heat, to wait for the tow coq,any that had been\ncalled. Both the 11111le and felllllle were very appreciative for the help. We loaded\neveryone into Jlf'J personal vehicle and returned to my house, including their 2\ndoga. Ille sat in my shop and waited for the tow company. At one point prior to\nreturning to my place, the male tried to give me 1110ney, which I refused, stating\nthe reason I was helping was to get them out of the heat, and the fe11111lea\ndiabetic issues, which were resolved with orange juice and some candy.\nApproxi11111tely 1,5 hours after arriving at fir/ place, the tow coiapany returned\nwith their truck, having replaced a flat tire and driving it out for them. I waa\nin the shop and walked outside where the male half was talking with the tow\nco111p11ny. He then said that we were trying to acam hi\u2022 as he walked up and got in\nmy face, accusing me of tricking him into a aca111. He became 1110re irate, and then\nstated that he was going to leave and get guns, conie back and shoot the place\nup. Thia is when I called Rivercoa and asked Lg to step it up, as they were\nalready enroute. The male continued to yell and accuse of iq,eraonating a\n11111\ncity equoyee and yelling obenities. He began calling my wife na11111a. I told him\nhe needed to calm down, and he reacted by peeling his veat off and pulled a\nfolding knife off hia hip, opened it, and stood in a stance ready to fight. I\ncalled Rivercom again and stayed on the line until LE was out with the male.\u2022\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written statements from\nAlthough I will transcribe these atate111ent in my narrative to the beat of Jlt'J\nability, please review their written atate-nt aa a part of your review of this\ncase.\n\"I Drove with my Husband Jeremiah to help out ao- people that were in Need of\nHelp aa we got there a lady and a man was there I then gave the wo11111n aon, water\ndue to She was the one that needed help 1110re. Apond Notice there truck had a\nflat tire and riding on ri111e, the man said that he would pay ua for the ride\ndown till a tow truck came and got the truck we told him that was not needed\njust pay our part forward then we told him that he need to take up pay for tow\nwith thein, everything was fine till tow pick up truck and they told him he\nneeded to money for the tow, they talked for a few then the man got into my\nhuabanda face an~ told hia that 1101118 one was going to get hurt and shot if thP.y\ntake hill true-;;, aft~r that. I ., lat\"terl to recored and then he pulled a knife and\ngot that on v.ledo aa well, lie began taking crap to 111e ao I got a little mouthey.\nhe was all over the board. With threatening\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written state-nt from ),\nAlthough I will transcribe these statement in my narrative to the beat of my\nability, please review their written statement aa a part of your review of this\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "filename": "Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "size_mb": 0.39, "modified": "2026-01-09T10:22:47", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to\njustice for her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been\nrushed to critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a\ncoalition of grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me,\nand that this is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my\nown civil rights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne 2.pdf", "filename": "BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne 2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T02:30:22.458719", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell", "recipient_email": "JMS_HELL@yahoo.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm.", "body": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm. Thank you.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:49 AM wrote:\nDEAR RYAN:\nSorry for the delay. It\u2019s been a rather hectic week.\nYour next court hearing is August 20 at 9:30 a.m. The judge authorized you to appear via Zoom for this hearing.\nAre you available today at around 3:00 p.m. to have a teleconference to discuss your case?\nSincerely,\nBrian Chase\nLaw Offices of Brian Chase, PLLC\n7 E Street S.E.\nQuincy, WA 98848\n(509) 787-9000\n(F) (509) 787-9040\nNOTICE:\nThis electronic communication and any attachments may contain privileged or other confidential information and\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nremain for the sole use of the named addressee, who is the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use,\ndisclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply email\nand immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments without copying, transmitting, or\ndisclosing the contents. Thank you.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:23 PM\nTo: Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell \nSubject: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304\nGood morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for\nme to appear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to\ngo over the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all\ncouncils assigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to\ncite formally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a\nyear.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record,\nabout the urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD\nfile though and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the\npark.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the\ntime of alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she\nmade to conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd\nrescue with these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work\nthe 911 centers They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know\nbetter than that. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other\ncommon sense stuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering\nsimple critical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and\n\u201cwhy didn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and\nfederal relief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail\nof sloppy cover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty\nattempt to cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and there\nhave been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel, presumably\nunder some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom 911. I\u2019ve been lied\nto on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse to consult for over 9\nmonths. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his office. When I arrived to\nwatch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces of video that would put the\nprosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy scrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names threatening\nto assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again and get them to\nintervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone\nand say \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow operator\nsaid \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s free to go\nby me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false but entirely\ninflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty maddening. Because I\nnot only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed as they destroyed my\ntransmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over 2900 all said on that.\nAnd I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER investigations\ninto Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then settled lawsuit\nan ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king county medical\nexaminers. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s evidence\nof needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to us.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were\nnot allowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding\nirreversible irreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911\ncalls; and also I think one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the\nspoilation of my voice audio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her\nto not let my passenger die. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council\nmember then Jeremiah shows up, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website.\nLook around the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made\nregarding dispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can murder\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nme but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can block me\naway then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case\n2 attachments\n07-05-24 24C06401 Hell Ryan Report.pdf\n1623K\nID#8385903208920250714161223.pdf\n991K", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:48", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "; crowe@seattletimes.com; cwinfrey@seattletimes.com;", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Urgent Legal Case - Evidence of Government Misconduct [EXTERNAL]", "summary": "[EXTERNAL]\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon.", "body": "[EXTERNAL]\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon. I desperately need legal representation or media attention.\nRyan Hell(267) 777-2344", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct_2.pdf", "filename": "RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:06:14", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT AND\nINTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior Court on\nthe MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of local\njurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE,\nCHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING\nNUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY, JUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case\npresents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence named in this motion merely highlights the few details\nfor just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which in fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather;\na dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke desperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT AND\nINTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior Court on\nthe MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of local\njurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE,\nCHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING\nNUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY, JUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case\npresents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence named in this motion merely highlights the few details\nfor just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which in fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather;\na dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke desperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to justice\nfor her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been rushed\nto critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a coalition\nof grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me, and that\nthis is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my own civil\nrights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nimage.jpeg", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Re-_Motion_To_Dismiss_With_Prejudice_Due_to_OUTRAGEOUS_Government_Misconduct__an.pdf", "filename": "Re-_Motion_To_Dismiss_With_Prejudice_Due_to_OUTRAGEOUS_Government_Misconduct__an.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:32:52", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "hotline@fcc.gov", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nChelan County Wa State: Egregious 911 Abuse and Cover Up\nRyan Hell Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM\nTo: \nMy name is Ryan Hell. My DoB is 01-09-1978.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nChelan County Wa State: Egregious 911 Abuse and Cover Up\nRyan Hell Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM\nTo: \nMy name is Ryan Hell. My DoB is 01-09-1978.\nI live in Seattle Washington.\nI am writing to inform you and desperately seek some injunction to stop the false prosecution of me, in light of a\nmountain of evidence of operational misconductuct and mal;feasence which namely, as it were;\nA CRIMINAL SCHEME TO KIDNAP AND MURDER ME DURING AN EMERGENCY CALL FOR URGENT LIFE SAVING\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE.\nI WAS KIDNAPPED BY CORUPT DISPATCHERS ON JULY 4th 2024 in Chelan County Wa State. They denied ambulance\noffered personal ride then OPERATION MANAGER took us to his personal home and had me assauklted and demanded\n1000 dollars cash for a non existant and unauthorized tow or repair of my truck; then later as seen in their video\nevidedence they demanded 1000 themselves saying\" this is for us. For savcing your life\"\nMassive cover up. They are attemotuhg to railroad me thru court with corrupt pubvlic defese and judges to disappear\nand silence me..,\nIMMEDIATE EM ERGENCY FEDERAL ASSISTANCE NEED}ED\nThis occured on July 4th 2024. The location was Malaga Wa, in Chelan County, the center part of Washingt State.\nOverview of Incident:\na friend and I had planned for some time to go camping with her dogs. As Juy 4th settled closer, we opted for a trip ion\nthat day, and packed our gear and took off in my 2007 F150 pickup. Fully licensed and current tabs and tags, as well as\na fishing license and state park pass. We drove to Wenatchee then up into the overlooking bluffs as I wanted to get\nphotos of a solar event and I did so. The following day it was decided to see if this remote park complex, largely known\nlocally as the Colockum Wildlife Park. There was a Wa State Discovery welcome board at the entrance which stated\nsome basic rules which we carefully examined and agreed we were in full compliance with. Dogs were allowed. So was\novernight up to three nights. Rules said obviosu thinhgs lkike Dont litter no fires/fireworks. Got it and totally ok with it.\nWe even left our cook gear ay storage to avoid any misunderstanding if they should stop or there was a fire in an area\nwe went to.\nJuly 4th\nWe used Google maps to route home now. Maps provided a passage route thropuh and beyond which would being us\nclose to or onto Blewitt Pass, with which we could get back to seattle.\nSometime during the early day my passenger, a disabled elderly woman named Gina Hrpcha; who has serious diabetic\nissues i now know/... informs me she forgot her insulin. We are inside this park network with no cell service.\nMaps was wrong. In fact it is a well known issue among locals according to many locals yet the issue remained and it\ncaught us totally off guard.\nWith the flat tire spare, I nursed my truck at a slow pace, desperately attempting to get this poor woman to services in\norder to get her to help, as her condition degraded quickly as the heat was severe and we had exhausted all water and\nfood now. She was falling asleep\nWe continued as though it went thru noty yet aware it dead ended. Upon being forced to stop I realize I had a flat tire.\nMy spare is also flat, I discover. I put the spare on though, since tire seemed fine and likey broke bead on a deep rut on\nthis rough gravel off road.\nMy passenger is well into diabetic shock or insulin coma now, and only intermittently wakes up. I am frantically\nscreaming to wake her up. I get about 20 miles; I estimate to within about 4 miles of paved roads... and I am completely\nstuck. The physical exertion involved in the ordeal thus far was framatic and I suspect I had a mild stroke, as I have in\nthe past., I realize as it is July 4th I am dealing with a urgent matter and must get help before its too late for us.\nI called 911 and was greeted on phone with rude WHAT DO YOU WANT RYAN?. I was dumbfounded. I explain the\nemergency and express urgency and the dispatcher callously says \"oh well, youre on your owm\". She argues with me for\napproximately 1/2 hour until I BEG her not to let this woman die; I said I know they are after me for political reasons\nbiut the woman is no part of it/ She has kids and grandkids, people will be devastated. I begged them,to rescue her if\nanything/\nEventuallu the dispatcher says she will make some calls. She ask me first \"wat year is uour truck and is it paid for?\" I\nimmediately recognized the mechanisms of a highway robbery type coercion towards road servuce amd I notified her\nVERY CLEAR; I DO NOT NEED A MECHANIC I DO NOT NEED A TOW! I NEED AN AMBULANC!!!! MAM PLEASE\nThe dispatcher then said \"well I dont have an ambulance but I can get your truck towed and you guys wiill be closer to a\nhospital;\". I said this is ludicrous. She saiud take it or leave it. Essentiallu.\nI flatly insisted NOBODY is working on my truck. It just needs air in the tire She went back and forth a half dozen times\nwasting more precious time, exhaustiung me then finally agreed that she heard me amd repeated that she understoof\ntjay I did not consent to any work or tow of my truck. She then said she had a citiy councilman and a orchards employee\nwho could come pick us up.\nThe promise was to drive us to a personal residence where a ambulance would wait for us.\nANOTHER hour goes by and a GMC pickup pulls up man and woman inside. We are grateful to be picked up and offered\nwater/ Keep in mind this is a one way VERY REMOTE and VERY isolated gravel road. We didnt see anyone other than\nthje park workers/\nThese two people drive us up the gravel; tp main road. During the trip I asked politely WHO they are. They ignored me\ncausing me some concern\nThe female takes a call and I hear her mentioning us to someone on the phone. I quietly asked the male who she was\ntalking to, hoping it was the ambulance. He said ite was her work...that she was a DISPATCHER. He claimed he was a\nfireman. Later he admitted he wqs a DISPATCHER also. And later yet I discovered on my OWN; Jeremiah Johnson IS in\nfact, the OPERATIONS CENTER MANAGER at RIVERCOM 911 A PSAP located in Chelan County Washington state and\nservbicng as he exclusive 911 center for Chelan and Douglas counmties in our state; a large territory.\n(Rivercom as I learned; is a private PSAP municipality. Supposeldy or boarded / chaired by politicos and or justices\netc. They keep that hidden though)\nAt the house they take us to I see rrigjt away there is no service on my phone nor my passengers. THIS CONCERNS\nME gravely. I see multiple peop;e tjhere freely using their cell phones and suspect foul play with radio interference.\nGiven what I since learned about Jeremiah Johnson's career I can see a strong likelihgood he jammed our phones.\nWhile there a woman was introduced, oddly three seperate times; as Jeremiah JHohnsons MOTHER. I knew it was\nunlikely but kept it secret, as my distrust for this rescue has bal;loned to sheer panic.\nAt NO TIME did anyone take my passengers vitals or assess her in any way, not even the slightest. This was another\nmassive red flag.\nI asked again and again periodically; where is the ambulance and they never had the same answer just kept lyying said\nit was on the way, they arent sure, it got lost etc etc.\nApproximately one hour into this Jeremiah ask me to go outside so I follow him. There in the long gravel driveway of\nthis very isolated, essentially desert canyon home; is my pickup with an unknown man driving it. Behind my truck still\ncoming down the road a way backl was a RED tow truck which carried an ATV.\nimage.png\nThe Red Tow truck stopped and I immediately filmed to ensure they did not lie and claim they TOWED my truck. I\ncaptured photos of the atv on back and they quickly tried to unload it while others pulled the red hummer fire truck to\nobscure my field of view I suspect. At any rate I was faster. And they are not claiming to have towed my vehicle best I\nknow. (FYI the red hummer was utilized fraudulently also I suspect. It is a first gen military type, and has normal civilian\nplates. I was informed its merely a parade truck. Yet they deployed it for effect by driving it up in front of me with the\nRED ONLY overhead light light bar flashing. Then multiple people adjopined wearing what I immeidately recognized as a\nknockoff city employee uniforms. In the case of Webnatchee its long been known that scammers will utilize\n\"Wenatchee\" shirts with a apple silhouette and it is incredibly similar to official CITY OF WENATCHEE attire the officials\nwear except it does not say \"CITY of..\" it just says Wenatchee\". In the video evidence I am heard addrssinf this.\nWhat occured in fact; without my knowledge or permission and totally against my explicit and repeated DIRECTIVES:\nTHEY STOLE MY VEHICLE.\nJeremiah had apparently communicated with Jerewmiah Johnson to determine year and make then secretly drove to my\ntruck after we were picked up and off waiting for the ambulance.\nThis man demanded 1000 dollars an even number. I know the state law requiores tow operators to register their fees\nwith our state capitol each year. And the idea he randmkly hiut 1000 dollars is ABSURD. I first said THANK YOU.\nSincerely. My hope is to get my injured passenger into my rig, abnd quietly get the hell down the road from this corrupt\ncircus before they freak out and murder us, because i am WELL aware of every. single con they are playing. I worked as\na commercial construction super in the northjeats NY, JErsey, Delaware, MAryland and Florida. I dealt with 100's of\ncorrupt inspectors who put their greedy hands out and did all sorts o\\f shameful crap to try to make an extra buck. I\nseen this all well away and played it cool, acted like i was a fool hoping to pay and leave then contest with visa later.\nThe tow man said no cards allowed. CASH ONLY which illegal in our state. I then thought of a clever way to send a signal\nfor sos to loved ones; I requested access to a phone to call nearby family who would bring cash. Then for no reason they\nvery flatly refused that as well. At that point i was in grave grave danger. They took my truck and wouldnt take payment.\nI then requested documentation or some sort of invoice. They smiled and said there isn't one nor will there be. This\nisn't an impound we are TAKING your truck. I was genuinely confused. I am face to face at this time and being serious\nand polite and gracious; these men are denying me means to make payment and my passenger at this time has now\nbeen away out of site over an hour while they shake. e down. I am desperately concerned for her and aware she is also\nin danger should they attack me to murder me.\nI decide to tell them I have family waiting for us down the road. This lie is one major reason I lived to escape these\nevents that day. During this phase I informed them that I am aware of this being an illegal operation. They yelled at me\nand called me names. I stated that they have clearly interfered with a duress call via 911. That they stole my truck. They\nlikely will face kidnap and extortion charges. They laughed and said I wont live to tell about it. I screamed for Gina my\npassenger she couldnt hear me I guess but I thought she was dead. I am standing there and Jeremiahhs wife Jena runs\nover and punches me in the face with a closed fist. Out of nowjhere., Almsit knocks me out. I stumble and knew\nIMMEDIATELY it was a setup to shoot me and kill me them claim self defense. The tow driver throws my keys down then\nsays he is done/\nJeremuah quickly snatched my keys and says i aint giving your truck backbag now get off my property before I shoot\nyour ass. I see his hand in his back; I beg for my passenger, plead for these people to calm down. Female is laughing at\nme spits on me. Jeeremiah keeps the threats saying leave now. They telll me the passenger is with them now. I asked\nthem to PLEAE get her so I can verify she is ok and wants me to leave. They REFUSE to!\nI immediately see a sketchy situatio where I could be pinned with her murder if i. leave her there and go alone. I STATE\nthat ....and I stay./ They call 911 report that I made threats to leave get a gun come bacl, some type of feloy threats.\nDuring the 45 minutes or so it tool deputi4s to arrive; I hear a woman yell \"WHERE IS RYAN?! I CANT :LET RYAN SEE\nME\". Nobnody know me there or anywhere. I dont have any enemies I know of...well corrupt poloticiasn I exposed in\n2017...YES. But I ran to see WHO she was. With 1% battery on my phone i ready it...and I snap about a dozen photos of\nthe woman fleeing.,. they told her again. \"HURRY, yiou have to go the sherifs deputies wont come on the property while\nyou are on it\".\nThis woman was 20 YEAR veteran CHIEF prosecutor in Seattle / King County, her name is Sally Bagshaw. She was most\nrecently City Councilwoman in 2017 when I heloed the seattle times investigators uncover former Seattle Mayor Ed\nMurrays cps scandal where a custody CPS judge found gold in 1984 for murray molesting his own foster son. This\napparently angered powerful peoople because my innocent wife at the time, Jacika Akter, who was a TSO wiuth TSA at\nSeatac; was robbed at gun point and chased into the hiway and nearly hit by bus. The police ated amused about that\nand the incident prompted our move to philadelphia and nyc. Where nothing like these thiungs happened untiul I moved\nhome a few years ago.... and the gand stalking all started over. Ive been assailted multiuple times nearly murdered many\ntimes. I plan on leaving after this.\nThe arrest was excessive and violent and WILD. They staged a shooting making me move a lot while yelling threats at\nme and saying \"put tsown the gun!\" and \"he has a gun\"... that sort of dialogue wwnr on for 20 minutes or so. I had\nnothing in my hands, beggerf for my life. They listened when i claimed they were being setup to kill a political target and\nthey would be sold out and arrested for lt.\nThe county took almost a YEAR to let me see video evidence. Its all been HEAVILY doctored. You can see the video\nanomalies that indicate they alrtewered it. Its likelu easy to see. Thjey also bulldozed a MOTION I presented A PROPER\nMOTION, to PRESERVE FORENSICS evidence. The prosecutor had nearly fallen out of his chair when he seen it, he\naske me directkly to with draw it. I siad sorry. They continued for two weeks then dismissed the motion after\nbasicalluy RAILROADING my merits which were sound.\nI have an evidence site up at www.ryanhellfiles.com\nBe aware the PSAP Rivercom is privately owned and they are terrified of accountability.\nALSOL: please be aware these people have LIKELY been engaged in similar activity and have cold cases mounting which\nmy case will expose.\nMY LIFE IS IN IMMEDIATE DANGER\nEvolving / WiP EVIDENCE STACK\nwww.ryanhellfiles.com\nRyan Hell - Seattle Wa 98144\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nI had no legal grounds to refuse that help. So I consented to accepting a ride.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Chelan_County_Wa_State-_Egregious_911_Abuse_and_Cover_Up.pdf", "filename": "Chelan_County_Wa_State-_Egregious_911_Abuse_and_Cover_Up.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:30:29", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified\nof me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice\nto share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not\nonly make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:49", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=\u2026=msg-f:1831672489715170539&simpl=msg-f:1831672489715170539&mb=1 Page 1 of 5", "summary": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:47", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed\nto me but the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong\ndoing and expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls\ncontrary to the claim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position\nthat you did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this\ninformation. Tampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts\n(although this would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting\nare crimes. There are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and\nhave no ability to charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who\ncan charge a felony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on\nprosecutors and governments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy,\nevidence. Certainly, despite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set\npeople up. I just do not see that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several\npoeple, typically police, working outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not\ngenerally a multi-agency coverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple\npolice, a person or persons who can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data\nthere, and the tow truck company. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and\nfreedom (as these would all be clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I\nreally just do not see that happening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms\nof evidence, they did not bother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial\nregarding the alleged threats themselves will have to come from their testimony.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah\nworked for rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I\nspoke to had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged\nher and she persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID\nFOR. How many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor\nabsolute Brady related potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of\nthe emergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and\nsome symptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so\nbadly I had to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of\nitself which will be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on\nour experience together, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me\nparanoid and claiming I was trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright\nlie and you are absolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and\nI proactively dismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t\njudge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania\njersey Maryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life\nlessons with small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being\nbuddies with a sheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down\nmultimillion dollar jobs because I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the\ngrandma who was their clerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the\ndoubt that I\u2019m not your average udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it\ncompletely refusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some\nwacky conspiracy concern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell\nservice and were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and\ndrive us to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the\nhospital. I asked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then\nsaying an ambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This\nlie was a trick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too\nfar to go for help. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no\ntow. There was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road\nwith two flats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you\nguys keep mentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off\nthat same night with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to\nthe dispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The\ntire was flat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and\nthe wheel before getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes\na ton of these.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because\nthere\u2019s everyone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated\nimpound bill dispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that\nclarified also and on the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the\nai generated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all\nof which was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back\nmachine internet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam\nall sorts of red tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of\nproving my innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the\nred Tacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them\napproaching at a pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the\ndisagrees called in on me so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of\nraising my hands and calmly indicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was\nout of the view of their dash cams and they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to\nshoot and even falsely claiming I was holding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again;\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nall I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s life. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed\nand never asked for. I was beaten threatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold\nblood by co-conspirators. Because their force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in\nconjunction with the bad actors who originated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of\ndoze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of your portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect\nlocation of arrest can be used to alter the timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the\nleast, needed to get near any bridge. And the implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues\nwhich I am exhaustively trying to outline as exculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself.\nAnyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor altercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical\nlocation of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain\nof evidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026\nand the father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s\na horrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence,\nassigning ineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his\nluck BUT NOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only\nimagine what might have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we\nwere kidnapped and denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They\ntried to extort me for unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my\ntruck presumably for a abandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is\nfalse, especially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one\nbut you is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and\nthey kept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely\nskeptical and think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some\ntime to think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that\nyou didn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring\nlight to the to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nof the employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to\npress that we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s\nfor two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY\nCREATED HER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all\nalong. I showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded\nby either Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:48", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Johnsons911-CAD-24C06401.pdf", "filename": "Johnsons911-CAD-24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T02:29:57.796454", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "CHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nRYAN MICHAEL HELL \u00a7 Location: Chelan\n\u00a7 Filed on: 07/05/2024\n\u00a7 JIS/SCOMIS Case Number: 24-1-00253-8\n\u00a7 Process or Transaction wa0400000100646167\n\u00a7 Control Number:\n\u00a7\nCASE INFORMATION\nOffense Statute Deg Date Case Type: ADL Criminal Adult\n1.", "body": "CHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nRYAN MICHAEL HELL \u00a7 Location: Chelan\n\u00a7 Filed on: 07/05/2024\n\u00a7 JIS/SCOMIS Case Number: 24-1-00253-8\n\u00a7 Process or Transaction wa0400000100646167\n\u00a7 Control Number:\n\u00a7\nCASE INFORMATION\nOffense Statute Deg Date Case Type: ADL Criminal Adult\n1. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii) Case Flags: Speedy Trial Expiration Date\nBodily Injury\nCount #: 1\n2. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii)\nBodily Injury\n3. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii)\nBodily Injury\nWarrants\nBench Warrant - HELL, RYAN MICHAEL (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E )\n02/24/2025 4:57 PM Sheriff's Return of Bench Warrant\n02/10/2025 11:50 AM Issued Bench Warrant\n02/10/2025 10:44 AM Ordered Bench Warrant\nFine: $0\nBond Set: No Bail\nDATE CASE ASSIGNMENT\nCurrent Case Assignment\nCase Number 24-1-00253-04\nCourt Chelan\nDate Assigned 07/05/2024\nPARTY INFORMATION\nAttorneys\nPlaintiff STATE OF WASHINGTON Munneke, Michael Henry\n(Criminal) 509-667-6202(W)\nDefendant (WIP) HELL, RYAN MICHAEL\nDATE EVENTS & ORDERSOFTHE COURT INDEX\nEVENTS\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance Findings and Order\nIndex # 1\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Probable Cause\nIndex # 2\n07/05/2024 Order Establishing Conditions of Release\nIndex # 3\n07/05/2024 Order for Protection From Civil Harassment\nIndex # 4\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance\nIndex # 5\nPAGE 1 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n07/05/2024 Receipts\nIndex # 6\nCHELAN COUNTY SHERIFF\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Indigency\nIndex # 7.99\n07/05/2024 Report\nIndex # 8.99\nCOURT'S RISK ASSESSMENT\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 9.99\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 10.99\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 11.99\n07/09/2024 Notice of Appearance and Request for Discovery\nIndex # 12\n07/09/2024 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 13\n07/09/2024 Information\nIndex # 14\n07/17/2024 Acknowledgement of Advice of Rights\nIndex # 15\n07/17/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 16\n07/17/2024 Initial Arraignment\nIndex # 17\n07/22/2024 Order\nIndex # 18\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL\n07/22/2024 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 19\n07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 20\n07/29/2024 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 21\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Application of Prosecuting Attorney\nIndex # 22\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Application by Defendant\nIndex # 23\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Hearing\nIndex # 24\n09/23/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 25\n09/23/2024 StatusConference / Hearing\nIndex # 26\n09/30/2024 Hearing Cancelled Plaintiff Prosecution Requested\nIndex # 27\nPAGE 2 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n11/18/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 28\n11/18/2024 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 29\n02/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 30\n02/10/2025 Order Directing Issuance of Bench Warrant\nIndex # 31\n02/10/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 32\n02/10/2025 Bench Warrant Issued Copy Filed\nIndex # 33\n02/24/2025 Sheriffs Return on a Bench Warrant\nIndex # 34\n02/25/2025 Order Setting Bail\nIndex # 35\nPR\nAmount: 0.00\n02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing\nIndex # 36\n02/25/2025 Report\nIndex # 37.99\nCOURT'S RISK ASSESSMENT\n02/27/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 38\n03/05/2025 Attachment\nIndex # 39\nPICTURES PROVIDED BY DEF\n03/05/2025 Order\nIndex # 40\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL AND TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL\n03/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 41\n03/17/2025 Notice of Appearance\nIndex # 42\n03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 43\n03/17/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 44\n04/23/2025 Motion and Affidavit Declaration\nIndex # 45\nTO APPOINT PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR AT PUBLIC EXPENSE\n04/23/2025 Order for Expert Services\nIndex # 46\n05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 47\n05/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 48\n05/28/2025\nPAGE 3 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nMotion\nIndex # 49\nTO PROVIDE DISCOVERY TO CLIENT\n06/02/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 50\n06/02/2025 Motion\nIndex # 51\nTO PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/02/2025 Order\nIndex # 52\nTO DISSEMINATE DISCOVERY\n06/02/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 53\n06/12/2025 Response\nIndex # 54\nSTATE'S TO DEF'S MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/16/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 55\n06/20/2025 Response\nIndex # 56\nDEF'S RE DISCOVERY AND EVIDENCE PRESERVATION\n06/23/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 57\n06/25/2025 Order\nIndex # 58\nON DISCOVERY PRESERVATION AND SPOILATION\n06/27/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 59\n07/07/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 60\n07/08/2025 Declaration Affidavit\nIndex # 61\nGINA HRPCHA\n07/09/2025 States List of Witnesses\nIndex # 62\n07/14/2025 Order\nIndex # 63\nDISQUALIFING COUNSEL\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 64\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 65\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 66\n07/14/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 67\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 68.99\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form Index # 69.99\nPAGE 4 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 70.99\n07/15/2025 Receipts\nIndex # 71\nCHELAN COUNTY SHERIFF\n07/17/2025 Motion and Affidavit Declaration\nIndex # 72\nFOR DISBURSEMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS\n07/17/2025 Order Expending Public Funds\nIndex # 73\n07/23/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 74\n08/20/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 75\n08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 76\n08/27/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 77\n11/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 78\n11/05/2025 Motion\nIndex # 79\nPRO SE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE & DISMISS\n11/10/2025 Order\nIndex # 80\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL\n11/10/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 81\nHEARINGS\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance (4:00 PM)\n07/17/2024 Arraignment and Trial Setting (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/05/2024 Order Establishing Conditions of Release\n07/22/2024 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nDISQUALIFICATION OF COUNSEL\n07/29/2024 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRE: COUNSEL\nEvents: 07/22/2024 Motion Hearing\n08/26/2024 CANCELED Omnibus (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nContinuance\n09/04/2024 Omnibus (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\n09/23/2024 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\n09/30/2024 CANCELED Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nStricken\nPAGE 5 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n10/08/2024 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nStricken\n11/18/2024 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM)\nEvents: 09/23/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n12/02/2024 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nContinuance\n02/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 11/18/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n02/10/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 02/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n02/18/2025 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nStricken\n02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing (4:00 PM)\n03/05/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nEvents: 02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing\n03/17/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nEvents: 03/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n05/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n05/20/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n06/02/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRELEASE OF DISVOERY/PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/16/2025 CANCELED No Contact Order (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRE-ENTRY\nDuplicate Hearing\n06/16/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nTO PRESERVE EVIDENCE/RE-ENTRY OF NCO\nEvents: 06/02/2025 Motion Hearing\n06/23/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE\nEvents: 06/16/2025 Motion Hearing\n07/07/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n07/14/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nEvents: 07/07/2025 Motion Hearing\n07/22/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n07/23/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nEvents: 07/14/2025 Motion Hearing\nPAGE 6 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n08/20/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/23/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n08/27/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 08/20/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n11/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n11/10/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 11/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n11/17/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nRE: COUNSEL\n11/18/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nDATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION\nAttorney ESWORTHY, SEAN\nTotal Charges 25.00\nTotal Payments and Credits 25.00\nBalance Due as of 11/14/2025 0.00\nDefendant (WIP) HELL, RYAN MICHAEL\nTotal Charges 5.00\nTotal Payments and Credits 5.00\nBalance Due as of 11/14/2025 0.00\nPAGE 7 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/CaseSummaryChelanClerk24-1-00253-04.pdf", "filename": "CaseSummaryChelanClerk24-1-00253-04.pdf", "size_mb": 0.35, "modified": "2026-01-27T02:29:53.596409", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "; crowe@seattletimes.com; cwinfrey@seattletimes.com; DHS FOIA Public", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Urgent Legal Case - Evidence of Government Misconduct CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you", "summary": "CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you\nrecognize and/or trust the sender.", "body": "CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you\nrecognize and/or trust the sender. Contact your component SOC with questions or concerns.\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon. I desperately need legal representation or media attention.\nRyan Hell(267) 777-2344", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct.pdf", "filename": "RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct.pdf", "size_mb": 0.07, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:04:57", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy Sean,", "summary": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion!", "body": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion! Brilliant idea, counsel\u2019!\nHere is some further clarification regarding the relevance of Protocol 33, as cited in my prior correspondence, and to\naddress your request for the source of this protocol. This information directly supports my motion to preserve\nevidence, as it establishes that RiverCom 911\u2019s handling of my 911 call violated mandatory emergency medical\ndispatch protocols, potentially constituting evidence tampering or negligence relevant to my case. Below, I outline the\nregulatory framework, RiverCom\u2019s adherence to these protocols, and their implications.\n1. Overview of Protocol 33 in Emergency Medical Dispatch Protocol 33 is a component of the Medical Priority\nDispatch System (MPDS), a standardized protocol used by 911 dispatch centers to triage and respond to medical\nemergency calls. Specifically, Protocol 33 addresses urgent medical emergencies, including inter-facility transfers and\nconditions such as suspected strokes or severe diabetic crises. It requires dispatchers to:\n\u2022 Classify the call based on reported symptoms.\n\u2022 Dispatch appropriate emergency medical services (EMS), such as paramedics.\n\u2022 Maintain the call\u2019s priority level unless a qualified medical professional (e.g., paramedic or physician) provides\ndocumented clearance.\nIn my case, the 911 call reported a potential stroke and a passenger with Type 1 diabetes who had not received\ninsulin, food, or water for two days\u2014both qualifying as medical emergencies under Protocol 33. The dispatcher\u2019s\nreduction of this call to a \u201croadside call\u201d without triage, medical assessment, or clearance violates these standards.\n2. RiverCom 911\u2019s Adherence to MPDS and Protocol 33 RiverCom 911, which serves Chelan and Douglas Counties,\nexplicitly utilizes the MPDS, including Protocol 33, as part of its dispatch operations. This is documented on\nRiverCom\u2019s official resources and training materials, accessible via their website (www.rivercom911.org). Specifically:\n\u2022 RiverCom\u2019s \u201cAbout Us\u201d and \u201cServices\u201d sections confirm that their dispatchers are trained and certified in MPDS\nprotocols to ensure compliance with national and state standards for emergency response.\n\u2022 RiverCom 911 Training Manual (referenced in their training materials) mandates the use of MPDS for all medical\nemergency calls, aligning with industry best practices for 911 operations.\nThis establishes that RiverCom is bound by Protocol 33\u2019s requirements when handling medical emergency calls, such\nas mine.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\n3. Washington State\u2019s Regulatory Authority Washington State further mandates compliance with MPDS protocols,\nincluding Protocol 33, through its regulatory framework for emergency medical services:\n\u2022 WAC 246-976-001 and WAC 246-976-182: These regulations, under the Washington Administrative Code, govern\nemergency medical services and require 911 dispatch centers to adhere to standardized protocols, protocols like\nMPDS to ensure proper EMS response to medical emergencies. WAC 246-976-182 specifically mandates that\ndispatchers dispatchers align EMS response with the reported severity of the call\u2019s severity.\n\u2022 RCW 70.168: This statute establishes the state\u2019s emergency medical Services and trauma care system, system\nrequiring coordinated dispatch responses to medical emergencies, emergencies consistent with protocols like MPDS.\nThese laws obligate RiverCom to follow Protocol 33, ensuring that medical emergencies are not improperly\ndowngraded without proper medical justification.\n4. Relevance to My Motion and Brady Implications The dispatcher\u2019s failure to follow Protocol 33 in my case\u2014\ndowngrading a medical emergency without triage or clearance\u2014raises concerns about evidence integrity, as the CAD\nfile reflects this improper action. This is directly relevant to my motion to preserve evidence, including CAD files,\ndispatch logs, radio communications, and metadata, to investigate potential tampering or negligence. Under Brady v.\nMaryland (373 U.S. 83 (1963)), the prosecution is obligated to disclose exculpatory evidence, including evidence of\nprocedural violations or tampering that could undermine the credibility of the state\u2019s case. The violation of Protocol 33\nconstitutes such evidence, as it suggests mishandling of my 911 call that could have impacted the incident\u2019s outcome.\n5. Request for Action Given the above, I respectfully request that you:\n\u2022 Incorporate this information into our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to my motion to preserve evidence.\n\u2022 Emphasize the Brady implications of RiverCom\u2019s protocol violation.\n\u2022 Pursue forensic analysis of the CAD file and related evidence to determine if tampering occurred, as the date\ndiscrepancy (May 27, 2025) remains unresolved despite your ambiguous / vague explanation citing \u201cin the range of\nwhen you requested it\u201d.\nPlease confirm receipt of this email and advise on next steps. If you require additional documentation or legal\ncitations, I am happy to assist in providing them.\nI\u2019m not a lawyer and I never attended law school or graduated a legal or social program. But I am capable of utilizing a\nnetwork of resources to provide help occasionally and I don\u2019t mind helping you with portions of the job which your\nAlma mater left out of corricul. Holefully someday this knowledge comes into play for one of your dui clients who you\ndefend.\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\nSincerely,\nRyan Hell\n267-777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:44 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n(1) Whether to pursue a plea deal or not is your call.\n(2) I'll file a short response today.\n(3) Where does this information about protocol 33 come from?\n(4) The 5/27/25 date corresponds to the time frame that I submitted the public records request to\nobtain the CAD log. This is consistent with other public records requests that I have made.\nThey have a portal here: https://rivercom911.org/public-records/\nPublic Records - RiverCom 911\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nHow RiverCom Responds to a Request for Public Records RiverCom will acknowledge a request for public\nrecords within five (5) business days of receiving the request, by one of the following: Provide the record\nAcknowledge the receipt of the request and provide a reasonable estimate of time to respond to and/or\ncomplete the request Request clarification of the record request\nrivercom911.org\n(5) I have also requested information on the license plate you have requested which you believe is\nSally Bagshaw.\n(6) I'll just give you the bottom line so you can decide if you want to ask for a new attorney on Monday\nor what.\nI think the odds this situation was orchestrated by some former disgraced Seattle employee and/or\nsome former city attorney is probably close to zero. I do not really engage or follow in conspiratorial\ncommunities or thinking and I am just looking at this for what it appears to be.\nIt seems more likely that you did get stuck in a remote area you believed would cut through back to the\nroads, but it did not, and you were stranded in hot weather with a passenger who was having a\nmedical emergency. You then called 911 for help.\nWhether you did or did not ask for it, they sent a tow truck and an off-duty dispatcher, Jeremiah\nJohnson, to find the truck. Jeremiah Johnson took you and the passenger back to his house. At some\npoint, the tow truck people started asking you to pay them for the tow.\nThere was a dispute over whether you should pay them at all and also that you had previously\ndisclosed to them that you were homeless and did not have any money. Thus, they should not have\nexpected payment.\nIt is around this time that they are alleging that during this dispute, you made a statement which\nconveyed something to the effect of \"you will take a bullet before you take my truck\" although the\nstatements from them seem to have varying versions of this alleged threat.\nIt was at this point, the guy's wife started filming on her phone and that he called the police.\nThe argument continued (without any further threat allegations from you), the wife makes some\nstatements and her own threat towards you. The husband approaches you around this same time\nframe and gets pretty close to the point where you pull out what appears to be a knife and then put it\naway. Both he and you called the cops.\nThen the cops arrived, essentially just taking the other people at their word, and arrested you.\nI still do not believe at this point that you have identified any particular defense to the allegation except\nto \"change the narrative.\"\nIf this case proceeds to trial, a judge will determine what comes into evidence and what does not. A\njury will hear the evidence that the judge lets in. That jury will be provided with a packet of papers\ncalled jury instructions which will outline some legal principles. Several of these documents will pertain\nto what the crime of harassment is legally defined as. The only thing the jury is called on to do is do\ndecide if the State, through the prosecutor, has proven that you committed these crimes beyond a\nreasonable doubt.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nThe base WPIC is here (and cites to several other ones): https://govt.westlaw.com/wcrji/Document/\nI093c5d8ba75611dd8931e514b9d4bd12?viewType=FullText&originationContext=\nView Document - Washington Criminal Jury Instructions - Westlaw\nTitle of crime. For ease of reference, the committee has referred to this crime as \u201cfelony harassment.\u201d\nThe word \u201cfelony\u201d should not be included unless the jury is also being instructed on the gross\nmisdemeanor form of the crime, WPIC 36.07.\ngovt.westlaw.com\nThere is no possibility during this trial that anyone besides you gets convicted of anything. Anyone\ncharged would get their own separate trial if they were ever charged. The only potential outcomes are\nthat the jury finds you guilty, not guilty, or cannot make a decision and there is a hung jury or mis-trial,\nwhich leaves open the possibility of another trial.\nIf you are convicted, you will have the right to appeal.\nWhile certain things will be relevant towards the potential bias of law enforcement or the parties\ninvolved (that at least Johnson was a dispatcher), it will be the jury that decides who is credible, or not,\nfactoring that bias in.\nMost of the potential jury pool is going to be just ordinary people who live in Chelan County. While\nsome may enjoy conspiracies, it is unlikely that all, or even most, of them will. And my assumption\nwould be that most, if not all, will not. It is also likely the judge will limit the evidence presented at trial\nto things they deem relevant to the issue of guilt, based upon the rules of evidence, and is probably\nnot even going to allow any tin-foil hat sort of stuff, although that will be their call.\nUltimately, you will likely need to testify in this case (although you have the right not to), if you want to\npresent your side of the case to the jury. Most likely, they are going to want to know if you made the\nalleged statement or not. If you did, they will want to know if it was a serious threat. If you did not, they\nwill want to know why these people are making this up. I do not think they will buy some story about a\nconspiracy to set you up in the middle of nowhere in Malaga, Washington and shake you down for a\nthousand dollars.\nIf you did make the statement, there are still some potential defenses as the threat, if made, was\napparently conditional, only in defense of your property, and in the context of a relatively long\nargument.\nJeremiah Johnson tells the cop in the video at about 37:45 that he wasn't worried about \"stepping it\nup\" until the knife portion, which was after well after the alleged threat.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Friday, June 20, 2025 6:03 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File\nDiscrepancy\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy\nSean,\nI am writing to ensure our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to the motion to preserve forensic metadata and\nlogs, scheduled for hearing next week, clearly addresses two critical issues:\n- a likely violation of International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD)\nprotocols by the RiverCom 911 dispatcher\n- a suspicious date discrepancy in the provided CAD file.\nThese issues are directly relevant to my defense against the felony harassment charges (RCW 9A.36.046) and\nconstitute exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, as they could demonstrate evidence tampering and\nmisrepresentation of my intent during the July 4, 2024, incident.\nThe CAD file for my initial 911 call confirms I reported a medical emergency for my type 1 diabetic passenger, who\nwas in possible insulin shock, underscoring my urgent request for help. However, the dispatcher marked the call as\n\u201cnot medical\u201d at the end, falsely claiming I retracted the emergency by stating my passenger was fine\u2014a claim I\nadamantly deny.\nUnder IAED EMD guidelines, specifically Protocol 33 for diabetic emergencies, dispatchers must assign a\nhigh-priority code (e.g., Delta) and dispatch an ambulance unless there is clear, documented evidence of\nretraction or on-scene medical verification that no emergency exists.\nNo such evidence exists, as I consistently pleaded for an ambulance.\nThe dispatcher\u2019s reclassification without justification violates EMD protocols and suggests an attempt to\ndownplay the medical emergency, aligning with the prosecution\u2019s narrative that I threatened individuals\nover a (non-existent) tow bill dispute, as emphasized in the harassment CAD file (call number 240700787).\nThe dispatcher\u2019s conduct during the call was highly unprofessional and irregular.\nShe answered rudely, saying, \u201cWhat? What do you want?\u201d and initially garbled her identity, only clarifying it was\nRiverCom 911 after I pressed her.\nWhen I requested an ambulance, she refused, stating, \u201cIt\u2019s the 4th of July, honey, there are no ambulances,\u201d and\ninsisted a mechanic inspect my truck\u2019s flat tire as a condition for any help.\nI refused repairs or towing to avoid potential extortion but agreed to a visual inspection only to secure ambulatory\nassistance, stipulating no repair bills.\nHer prior knowledge of my truck\u2019s condition within seconds of my initial call; which I hadn\u2019t mentioned, and her\nrefusal to dispatch an ambulance without mechanic involvement are absent from the CAD file, indicating possible\nomission or editing.\nThese actions breach IAED EMD protocols, which prioritize medical response over unrelated conditions, and\nsupport my claim that the dispatcher\u2019s handling was targeted and prejudiced, possibly tied to broader evidence\nmanipulation in this case.\nThe CAD Master Call Table for the harassment call (240700787), visibly dated 05/27/25, raises further concerns.\nThis date, nearly a year after the incident on July 4, 2024, suggests the file may have been edited, exported, or\naltered before being provided in discovery.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nCAD systems log modifications with timestamps and user IDs, and a future date could indicate tampering to align\nwith the prosecution\u2019s narrative.\nMetadata analysis, as requested in our forensics motion, could confirm when and by whom this file was accessed or\nedited, directly challenging the integrity of the evidence used against me.\nThe dispatchers felony harassment CAD file also references a prior call (likely 24C06391) where my passenger and\nI were assisted but omits critical medical details, further suggesting selective reporting to frame me as aggressive\nrather than a person acting under duress to save a life.\nTo strengthen our defense, please include the following in the rebuttal:\n(1) Argue that the dispatcher\u2019s reclassification of my medical call as \u201cnot medical\u201d violates IAED EMD Protocol 33,\nlacking documented evidence of retraction, and request access to RiverCom\u2019s audit logs to verify the change\u2019s\nlegitimacy.\n(2) Highlight the 05/27/25 date discrepancy on the CAD file as evidence of potential tampering, necessitating\nmetadata analysis to confirm its modification history.\nThese points are exculpatory, as they could prove the prosecution\u2019s evidence was manipulated to misrepresent my\nactions, undermining the harassment charges.\nPlease confirm by email that this rebuttal has been filed by June 23, 2025.\nSincerely, Ryan :)", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:46", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\n3 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\n4 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me\nfor unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or endorse\nthem. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false, especially\ncitations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their property.\nI am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat to get a\ngun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated the\nthreat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this seems\nlike a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since the\nalleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make that\nthey get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "filename": "SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.15, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:50", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "heriberto@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:41 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nJustin\nI\u2019m frustrated about the potential loss of exculpatory evidence in my case.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:41 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nJustin\nI\u2019m frustrated about the potential loss of exculpatory evidence in my case. This incident happened back in July 4th and\nI still have not heard from anyone regarding the 911 call logs.\nI think the dispatch call logs are very fragile since the alleged victims in this case are actual dispatchers and the\ncase involves at least three dispatchers from the same dispatch call center (riverside).\nI have not had a chance to talk to you regarding this incident and I am bound by a court order to not contact said\nwitnesses so thereby I am prohibited from obtaining these records myself.\nI am contacting the regional FBI office as well as state patrol today to attempt to create an incident report and\nexpress my grave concern that justice is being denied to me and exculpatory evidence is intentionally being scuttled\nby the city of Chelan.\nThe 911 call very clearly was an emergency call to get ambulatory care for my passenger who is a 60 year old diabetic\nand was going into insulin shock due to extreme conditions and not having her insulin for two days in extreme heat\nwithout food or water. They were very clearly told numerous times that I was not asking for mechanical help of any\nsort and I would deal with my vehicle myself.\nThis is absolutely the most absurd and rediculous case I am aware of. It\u2019s ludicrous it\u2019s being charged and it\u2019s\nextremely disturbing that nobody is talking to me about my case and I have yet to obtain legal defense who will\nacquire the absolutely critical and exculpatory 911 recordings.\nAgain, given that these alleged victims are all dispatchers at the very center my call was made to: it\u2019s critical to obtain\nthese call logs and recordings asap.\nPlease let me know what the situation is. I can\u2019t help but think that this is collusion. The judge should have been able\nto see this case was a complete farce and they were absolutely criminal for kidnapping holding hostage then extorting\nme.\nYou guys need to realize that this isn\u2019t some joke to me and I need some answers. I won\u2019t sit on my hands while you\nfolks disappear my 911 call recordings. I will be as proactive as possible and contact everyone I can.\nIf you cannot find the time to do it then please schedule me a hearing so I can request permission to obtain them\nmyself.\nThank you Justin. If you are truly swamped I get that, and I am sorry and didn\u2019t mean to come across as angry. I\u2019m\njust facing a lot of time for a crime I never committed, three felonies.\nI haven\u2019t had so much as even a speeding ticket or late library book since 2002.I put myself thru accredited university,\nstarted three llc\u2019s one of which was in Wenatchee (Apple Valley Pc), I have pushed hard to stay on my own two feet\nafter divorce and homelessness in nyc where I was during Covid. I worked my way across the country to come home\nto be with my 98 year old grandmother who is in last years. This is robbing me of that.\nI did nothing wrong. These scumbags were not good Samaritans. They were bandits who laid a booby trap on public\nland then denied a sick woman emergency medical care and berated the man who called her help, and attempted to\nextort money. They destroyed my vehicle which I have had for almost a decade and driven all over this country to\nwork, move my wife and I, and also to volunteer which I can substantiate a lot of free voluntary trips to work with a\nvariety of agencies.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:19 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThis incident absolutely DISGUST ME. It has me ready to puke. I am outraged that bc the city of Wenatchee is\nengaging in a cover up of this magnitude, for some toothless creeps. Predators is what they are. I\u2019ll be waiting for a\nreply. Thank you for your time\nRyan Hell\nOn Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:35 AM Beto Martinez wrote:\nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:19 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/WarnedOfExculp-911AudioTitusSep-25-24.pdf", "filename": "WarnedOfExculp-911AudioTitusSep-25-24.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:54.646315", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Ryan Hell", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...", "body": "Gmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nDEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE AND DEFENSE REQUESTED\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 6:56 PM\nTo: Ryan Hell , Jacika Akter \nIT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION,\nby way of recent revelations, discovery of persons. and provided documents (I.E. archives and history), that there are\nmultiple STATE AND CITY court officials who are definitively classifiable as \"bad actors\u201d.\nThese bad actors were criminally engaged in some type of nefarious , and ILLEGAL activity in order to :\n1. circumvent justice,\n2. inhibit free speech and,\n3. manipulate election outcomes. t\nNamely, they kidnapped and extorted me for no reason of my own.\nThey later fabricated an allegation portraying themselves as good samaritans attacked by myself alleged to have\nmade some sort of verbal threats.\nThe act of kidnapping was present based on theelement of duress by myself and my aging, disabled, diabetic\npassenger whom they separated me from and denied either party contact... for whom I called begging for ambulatory\nservices after a harrowing 2 day ordeal attempting to get our vehicle out of a canyon after having two suspiciously\ncaused flat tires.\nWe desperately depended on THE EMS 911 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ATTENTION AND THEY USED THAT premise\nas an opportunity to FORCE us into their PERSONAL vehicle and to their RESIDENCE. This residence was outside of\ncell service and away from the hospitals.. and we never did get ANY sort of medical attention for my passenger.\nUltimately they eventually sent her in my truck over to Seattle, after handing her the keys to my truck. The truck broke\ndown half way and had to be towed and required an expensive TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT.\nIn fact the merits of this case will support evidence that these officials were attempting to commit something akin to\nwitness elimination.\nAdditionally, although more fit for the jury to interpret, perhaps; the tow driver UNLAWFULLY moved my vehicle by\ndriving it. I gave explicit directions to dispatch as well as the homeowners / off duty dispatchers that NOBODY is to\ntouch my vehicle without my presence.\nAs if the classic hisar robbery scheme is not clear enough; TOW TRUCK OPERATOR who had been\nDEMANDING my vehicle or \u201c1,000 dollars in US CASH BILLS ONLY\u201d; had surrendered my keys to the OFF DUTY\ndispatcher / homeowner after I carefully and calmly reminded him that he is required under statute to gain MY\nauthorization to touch that vehicle and has now stolen it, This seemed to stop his persuit, and after some abusive\nname calling to me, and trying tp FALSELY identify himself as a good samaritan , he violently yelled at the\nhomeowner and threw my keys claiming he was no longer interested in the truck or me. As I turned to\nJermiah and politely asked for my keys, he said \u201cYou aint getting your truck punk\u201d. I realizes at this point I\nwas now a victim of robber as well, as physical force began to be thrown at me as Jeremiah was increasingly\nfrustrated as he seemed to be losing control of his accomplices and the planned scheme seemed to spiral. I\ndecided to focus om a foot escape with my passenger, and then contact a agency such as State Patrol\nintervene with this lawless contempt pf public trust.\nBACK STORY / MOTIVE BEHIND SALLY BAGSHAW STALKING AND ATTEMPTING TO MURDER ME:\nI have long been a Ed Murray opponent and one of the harshest social media broadcasters, whilst the next party I will\nhighlight has been publicly passionate about protecting and hiding the crimes committed by Ed Murray causing his\nvoluntary resignation. IN 2017, MY WIFE, A TENURED FEDERAL OFFICER WAS ROBBED AT GUNPOINT, in a\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:23 PM\nGmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ndaring and unusually brazen public crime committed in 2017 on Pacific Hiway. This happed shortly after Ihelped the\nSeattle Times identify posible locations of sealed records concerning sexual offenses\u2026EUGENE OREGON\u2026 which\nultimately yielded a swift discovery and rapid successive voluntary resignation by Murray soon after. Keep in mind one\nof his accuser mysteriously died just days prior to, of am alleged overdose.\nFurther, the incident most concerning, has involved a very carefully planned and executed plot to stage a fake murder\nsuicide, thus carry out a premeditated murder . I will present that evidence when called upon to do so.\nSOLVED: FLEEING ACCOMPLICE OF THE HOMEOWNERS\nThere was a female driving a red pickup who was frantically fleeing the scene there.. She yelled something to the\neffect of \u201cI don\u2019t want him to see me\u201d and the men yelled to her \u201cjust go! Hurry the cops are almost hear\u201d.\nNEAR FATAL FALSE ARREST WITHOUT JUSTIFIED USE OF FORCE\nThe arrest itself was extremely dramatic and it was clear to me they were called upon to MURDER ME, again, for\nwitness elimination. I can substantiate this at the very least, by way of highlighting the verbiage in the dialogue\nbetween dispatchers and homeowners. Arresting officers were personal acquaintances of Jeremiah according to\nJustin Titius, appointed counsel. This alone is extremely unsettling and I do thank the officers for their last minute\nhesitation after intiially contacting me violently and accusing me of possessing a firearm.\nAS ALWAYS I REMAINED CALM AND COOPERATIVE, COMPLYING WITH ALL DIRECTIVES.\nI was able to capture multiple photos and I have just nowdiscoverd that the woman was none other than Seattle CITY\nCouncil Woman, and former 8 year tenure under ( N Maleng) SENIOR prosecutor, and more\u2026..SALLY BAGSHAW.\nI have compiled a number of montages and presented them to federal analyst to assess and it has been universal\nconsensus that the woman fleeing the Wenatchee address of my ALLEGED crimes, was in fact, SALLY BAGSHAW.\nFURTHER:\nYour court stenographer, WAS ALSO PRESENT AND WAS INTRODUCED TO ME AS ONE OF THE\nDFEFENDENTS MOTHERS. I was shocked to come to court and see her uniquely unforgettable appearance and\nstartled to see her visibly become uneasy and attempt to hide her face as I simply sat in the court room. With not\ndoubt this woman. Is the defendants CLAIMED mother.\nI have tried multiple times to present this to two judges and JUSTIN TITUS, my counsel assigned, has urged me\nnot to due to the likelihood I would be arrested for contempt.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:23 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/decleration-RealizationofConspiracyFeb-5-2025.pdf", "filename": "decleration-RealizationofConspiracyFeb-5-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:33.672086", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important", "summary": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/RE-__External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "RE-__External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.07, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:26:26", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Good morning Brian. I am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.", "body": "Good morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for me to\nappear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to go\nover the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all councils\nassigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to cite\nformally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a year.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record, about\nthe urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD file\nthough and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the park.\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the time\nof alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she made\nto conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd rescue\nwith these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work the 911\ncenters They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know better than\nthat. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other common sense\nstuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering simple\ncritical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and \u201cwhy\ndidn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and federal\nrelief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail of sloppy\ncover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty attempt\nto cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and\nthere have been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel,\npresumably under some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom\n911. I\u2019ve been lied to on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse\nto consult for over 9 months. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his\noffice. When I arrived to watch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces\nof video that would put the prosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy\nscrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names\nthreatening to assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again\nand get them to intervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone and\nsay \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow\noperator said \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s\nfree to go by me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false\nbut entirely inflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty\nmaddening. Because I not only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed\nas they destroyed my transmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over\n2900 all said on that. And I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER\ninvestigations into Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then\nsettled lawsuit an ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king\ncounty medical examiners. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s\nevidence of needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to\nus.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were not\nallowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding irreversible\nirreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911 calls; and also I\nthink one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the spoilation of my voice\naudio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her to not let my passenger\ndie. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council member then Jeremiah shows\nup, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website. Look\naround the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made regarding\ndispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can\nmurder me but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can\nblock me away then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Re-_Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "Re-_Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:08:05", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: \nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS. Ryan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: \nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to make\nit off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was not\ncarrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911 service).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to accompany\nthe male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator, and I\nneeded to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle has\nbeen done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as auto\ntheft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let us\ngo, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an unknown\nfemales voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The man yelled \u201cyou\nhave to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where he is?!\u201d And the\nman yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here trying\nto do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take capture that\nevidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming behaviors and\nconduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They performed a\nbizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front (dash cam I\npresume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm voice that I am non-\ncombative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and made repeated threats\nto shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a mere 20 feet away, broad\ndaylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one more\nword. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I am\ncomplying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said the\nnext time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as I\ncompiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard trying\nto dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and I\nslammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they claimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log) \u201che\ndoesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to let\nme know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to why\nthat delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in. I\npolitely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he wanted\nto part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to come\nview video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was floored by the\negregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on video. The video\nsupports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other than to put my hands\nip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing their\nclaim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:27:51", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: State's response to motion\n1 message\nRyan Hell Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1.", "body": "Gmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: State's response to motion\n1 message\nRyan Hell Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged\nand confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any\nunauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies of\nthe original message.\n1 of 1 1/24/26, 2:31 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/BradyMotionRequest-SeanEstworthy-June-16-2025.pdf", "filename": "BradyMotionRequest-SeanEstworthy-June-16-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:29.142036", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file this into the record Sean,", "summary": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford.", "body": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford. Help with\nher shopping, her chores, shopping, laundry and her dogs which i am helping her train. I have told Juystin during the\nfirst week, in a hearing at the courthouse, I requested access to ask the court for provisions for mrs Hrpcha and Titus\ninformed me that he didnt see her listed as a \"witness\", therefor there was no problem at that time with mrs Hrpcha\nbeing in contact with me.\nMy concern now would be restrictions on communication with mrs Hrpcha, if I add her as a witness. Obviously\nthis is a matter with importance since I generally see Mrs Hrpcha every day and she is in fact going to be driving me to\ncourt on monday.\nWhat are your thoughts?\nThank you\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:49 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nAlright, I can file it into the court file and provide it as discovery to the prosecutor.\nHowever, if the case proceeds to trial, the court the court will want live testimony from fact witnesses.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:19 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file this into the record\nSean,\nUntil otherwise informed, I am still reliant on you and need you to file this onto the record into evidence please.\nThank you.\nGmail - Re: Please file this into the record 1/3/26, 12:15 PM\nStatement, voluntary, from passenger Gina\nDisability certification, for passenger Gina", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:45", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:34 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that\nany unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies\nof the original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:34 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/RyansResponseToSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "filename": "RyansResponseToSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:42.016177", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion_2.pdf", "filename": "Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:17:47", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:53 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:53 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email. This is an unmonitored account.\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Please save your record\nnumber for tracking. Your record number is: 633568-CVL.\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still\nexperiencing physical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911\nand contact the police.\nWhat to Expect\n1. We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil\nrights violations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your\nreport.\n2. Our specialists determine the next steps\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the\nJustice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report.\nIf so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your\nreport and will recommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid\norganization.\n3. When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not\nalways be able to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you\nprovided in this report. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you\nneed to reach us about your report, please refer to your report number when contacting\nus. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat You Can Do Next\n1. Contact local legal aid organizations or a\nlawyer if you haven\u2019t already.\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help\nyou with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices),to help you find a legal aid\nlawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2. Learn More\nVisit civilrights.justice.gov to learn more about your rights and see examples of\nviolations we handle.\nPlease Note: Each week, we receive hundreds of reports of potential violations. We\ncollect and analyze this information to help us select cases, and we may use this\ninformation as evidence in an existing case. We will review your letter to decide\nwhether it is necessary to contact you for additional information. We do not have the\nresources to follow-up on every letter.\nContact\ncivilrights.justice.gov U.S. Department of (202) 514-3847\nJustice 1-855-856-1247 (toll-free)\nCivil Rights Division Telephone Device for the\n950 Pennsylvania Deaf\nAvenue, NW (TTY) (202) 514-0716\nWashington, D.C.\n20530-0001\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division_2.pdf", "filename": "Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:17:05", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "justin@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are. Since it\u2019s clear to me that\nI am being denied equal justice I want to highlight some concerns and reasons followed by my desired outcomes or\nsolutions. I appreciate you taking the no one to read this.\nI haven\u2019t had any significant time to get acquainted with the cases evidence witnesses or discuss even preliminary high\nlevel defense strategies. This case stems back to July 4th so I think it should be obvious that it\u2019s bothering you\nsomehow to do so, and either way it\u2019s too serious for me to give you any more chances.\nWe have agreed to talk dozens of times and I have yet to really get a quality conversation with you to shape up the case\nfor trial, and hear we are already facing readiness.. again.\nI\u2019ve left multiple emails and text and calls; dozens trying to get b the court date confirmed and you would not reply\nback. What\u2019s stranger is the court clerks told me I could not obtain my court date info with no case number and they\nconstantly refer me to you. It\u2019s almost like I\u2019m being manipulated and gas lighted and it all feels very immature and\nchildish to say the least.\nToday\u2019s ordeal of being scolded about missing TEO dates when the date I had last noted was the 18th\u2026 this isn\u2019t my\nstyle. I do my homework. I\u2019m on time. I graduated Cum Laud in an accredited engineering school. Worked my through\nduel majors in info science. Slouch I am not. And don\u2019t like being mistreated and lied to.\nThis case is a wonderful mess and it very likely has some officials in Wenatchee and probably Seattle also; sweating.\nNot my intention but also not at all my fault, either.\nYou see I simply called for medical help for my disabled friend and we were told our only option was to get on a personal\ncar with strangers\u2026 and being the good hearted person of trusting faith who I am; I no was taken for a ride.. no pun\nintended.\nI surmise we were lucky n to escape alive and I have some key details which are illustrated by the \u201cvictims\u201d own\nstatement, photographs and probably the 911 call recordings which is another issue entirely.\nI\u2019ve demonstrated that there were nefarious bad actors in this event. People who targeted us before we even called for\nthe ambulance. Then I s things escalated there was an unknown person who was ushered out the back door and\ncoached to flee fast before the police arrived. This woman as it turns out, was\nSALLY BAGSHAW. Former senior prosecutor and city council in Seattle. Embattled representative who aggressively\nprotected Ed Murray even after his incredibly I disgusting history of pedophilia accusations made by African American\nFoster Children.\nThere seems to be a pattern here with these people.\nViolate public trust\nGas light victims\nPlay victim while doing horribly things\nAccuse the accusers of being the culprits\nWithout a doubt Sally Bagshaw will have to get real creative to explain what she was doing at that crummy ranch house\nand why she attempted to flee before police arrived.\nOne of the main reasons this case cannot proceed until I formally have a chance to obtain new counsel;\nThe court staff I pointed out our first day\u2026 superior court stenographer. She was actually involved in the rouse.\nThe merits of the case I feel, represent a clear case of kidnapping and extortion. We were told the only way my friend\nwouldn\u2019t die, is if we got into these folks car. Initially dispatch also lied and said we were going to be picked up by city\ncouncilman. Instead it was rather more dispatchers for the questionable Riverside.\nIn addition they interfered with a medical duress call.\nAnd most disturbing of all\nIn the reports and statements; they made multiple attempts to get me to leave alone. Without my passenger who\nneeded insulin.\nNo sense in claiming they had intended to help her because they never did get her medical attention. So that\u2019s not why.\nI believe the plan was to kill her then chase me down and kill me, then create a false report that I fled the scene after\nkilling g her. Or even worse yet, kill her then arrest me and blame me for the murder.\nOne thing surely though; she wasn\u2019t being held onto for ransom. Or conversation. Or humor. Or money.\nI know in my heart that the plan in Wenatchee called for death to at least one of us, and then incarceration or death to\nthe other (myself). That makes me incredibly sick and I\u2019ve been perplexed by the revelations this past uear in the things\nI\u2019ve discovered afoot around me.\nIt\u2019s sick! And I am not sitting down quietly, I have tactfully presented my findings to a variety of agencies and entities\nand my goal is I to eradicate these criminally corrupt city I people so no more innocent people are harmed.\nI am asking respectfullyfor two things:\n1:) your resignation from this case; and I presume you are released to hear that. I get it. No hard feelings.\n2:) formal request for change of venue due to excessive concerns of witnesses and personell with conflict of interest;\nA) stenographer\nB) Riverside dispatcher #1\nC) Riverside Dispatcher #2\nD) Riverside dispatcher #3\nThese people occupy N salaried positions within the very same courthouse as the halls of justice I am no expected to\npress my case before; and I think it\u2019s foolish to pretend there will be a fair trial of held in Chelan or Douglas.\nI\u2019d hope for some place like Olympia since we now have emerging evidence of a major political scandal amidst this case.\nI\u2019d request to be in the presence of a jury and court personnel who can ensure integrity with a jury trial which involves\nsophisticated deep state orientated bad actors and brazen corruption, disdain for justice, and a sort of grand\nmalfeasance which most mid sized communities are scared to approach.\nThe only Good Samaritan that day was myself.\nI will continue to comply with court directives and I won\u2019t miss any hearings but I have to have access to proper\nchannels in order to learn what my obligations are. I feel like I probably sound patronizing when I say things like that, but\nI can\u2019t see any other way to express that without having access to a lawyer or being told n when new court dates are\nscheduled; I can\u2019t see how I am expected to show up.\nFurther; it\u2019s my understanding the original al court date was on the 5th. I missed that not knowing so they scheduled me\na new court date for today. How am I supposed to know that?\nThe gist I of it all feels like I\u2019m being toyed with by a judge that has some sort of childish vendetta for me. Which is\npretty sad since I have no prior experience with any of you. And if my free speach offended you this much, you folks\npicked the wrong profession. Because this country and our bygone laws as well as our spirit moving forward; are\nfounded firmly around this Nations unrivaled no holds barred FREEDOM OF SPEACH.\nI\u2019m not sure where you learned but I have no doubt t you must have studied more law then I have; but one of my\nmost formative experiences was a Jewish Holocaust survivor I had for a teacher in grade school; and she spent an entire\nweek covering the topic at that time in the 1980\u2019s, about Skinheads and the Aryann Nation, the KKK etc. As kids we\ncouldn\u2019t believe it was tolerated. \u201cSurely it\u2019s illegal!\u201d. No, it\u2019s not. She explained. She went on to quote and provide\nexamples illustrating how the country can only hold up free speech rights by protecting the most hated speech first.\nAnd she taught us that she doesn\u2019t care for it but she doesn\u2019t have to. And it\u2019s not her life she doesn\u2019t have to live that\nway. They do. It doesn\u2019t bother her.\nI\u2019m no right winger. Not racist. I do have concerns about pedophiles grooming school kids. I do have concerns with\nphony liberals and vocalize them. But that\u2019s because I was raised in an established democratic family and felt they failed\nto do the right thing g too many times. And to be honest it was just this sort of dishonest conduct.\nFor the level of contempt one of two things is occurring. You all are spending too much time n on my social media where\nI\u2019ve been bound to whole undergoing this trial. Or you have a particularly right wing mind set, regardless of party\nidentify. We are all fluid social animals. Don\u2019t get hu g up on my personal life of acting a fool online to pass time etc.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case.pdf", "filename": "Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:29:10", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Regarding your prior experience and my declaration; when we talked you said you didn\u2019t notice any crime as Jana as she\nis named, made threats to slap the shit out of me on the video which has now been removed from what I have. I asked if you heard that and reminded it.", "body": "Regarding your prior experience and my declaration; when we talked you said you didn\u2019t notice any crime as Jana as she\nis named, made threats to slap the shit out of me on the video which has now been removed from what I have.\nI asked if you heard that and reminded it. You said yes and didn\u2019t seem interested. I asked what your background was if\nyou ever dealt with a felony harassment case or were familiar with the legal constructs of the law which outline\nrequirements and you. Said vaguely and I said the requirement is that the victim is genuinely and legitimately afraid and\nthat conduct of hurling insults and threats of bodily harm to me as Jana clearly did in the video we watched at your\noffice; that\u2019s not conducive to someone who is afraid of someone: to behave in such a way as JANA was showed she\nwas not in any fear. That\u2019s when I explored your experience and knowledge of the relevant law with a couple preliminary\nquestions and you told me you mostly do dui and have never dealt with a felony harassment. That\u2019s all I was conveying\nand it isn\u2019t to insult anyone.\nSean I haven\u2019t done anything unreasonable here and you know this. This alleged crime has been tailored to stick to me\neven though I never committed it. It failed to provide the video proof. And they continue to shape things.\nWhat do they want me to rot in jail for? Ed Murray! I didn\u2019t do anything wrong I simply talked about something which is\nillegal and horrible and they are retaliating to silence me. Other than that why are they railroading me for this.\nAnd why is my passenger not listed in any court papers! I sense grave harm is coming her way and they hid her from the\nrecord to avoid a lawsuit.\nNeither of us want to file a lawsuit. But they kidnapped me then assaulted me and they are trying to put me in prison for\nthis. I am innocent absolutely innocent.\nYou have any suggestions? Or am I supposed to quietly go to a mock trial full of doctored evidence and lying officials\nwho were engaged in a kidnapping scheme for Sally Bagshaw?\nI would be willing to sign a gag order and not release records and move out of state if they will let me. I didn\u2019t know they\nwere this violently trying to harm me!? How psychotic of them what wackos.\nAnd Jeremiah\u2019s wife not working for Rivercom is not true. Perhaps now. I personally have witnessed her entering\nRivercom. So was she fired from there and if so was it over this incident?\nJeremiah surely doesn\u2019t expect to be allowed to commit this crime unchecked does he? Because the fCC and homeland\nsecurity are very interested in the incident since it obstructed life saving 911 service and involved them.\nI just want to be done with this and move. What can I do\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 5:03 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nThey sent me the recording and I have uploaded it the Dropbox.\nThe State provided some other items as well, one which does confirm that Jeremiah Johnson is the\noperations manager.\nThere is a second public records request response which indicates that Jana Johnson does not work\nfor RiverCom.\nYour statement was something more along the lines that I was only a DUI attorney, and either explicitly\nor implicitly said that I did not do felony cases, which is not accurate. You talked throughout much of\nthe video playback, and I certainly may have mentioned doing DUI cases at some point, but I really do\nnot see how that is neither here nor there. I have been on the felony conflict panel for years.\nIn order to be able to move forward on this case, unless there is actual, solid evidence of some larger\nconspiracy, am going to take the case as it is presented. I have already outlined this in a previous e-\nmail and until there is something that would be able to convince a jury otherwise, pursuing what I\ncurrently view as an outlandish defense is a lost cause.\nA possible defense in a similar vein is that you believed this all to be the case, whether or not the facts\nare there to back it up. We would probably need an expert witness to pursue that, however.\nBob can certainly reach out to Gina if she has a phone number.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 2:29 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Clarification on council request history\nOk perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the\nrecord that they are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too\nand would surprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun\npoint onnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this\nwoman who is disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury\nme after they did all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in\nthe face for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager\nand their license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned.\nEver. So far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured\nthey have the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge\npossibly moved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and\nI reluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not\nlying at all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court,\nand it creates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely\ninaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why\nI missed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges\nand the judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes\nto that question. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_2.pdf", "filename": "Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:14:59", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in part\nfor that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing videos\nwhere you told me you were a DUI lawyer.", "body": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in part\nfor that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing videos\nwhere you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the record that\nthey are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too and would\nsurprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun point\nonnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this woman who\nis disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury me after they\ndid all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in the\nface for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager and\ntheir license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned. Ever.\nSo far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured they\nhave the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge possibly\nmoved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and I\nreluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not lying\nat all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court, and it\ncreates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely inaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why I\nmissed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges and\nthe judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes to that\nquestion. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_3.pdf", "filename": "Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_3.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:15:40", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a\nconflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit\nmurder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask\nyou to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect\neveryone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of\nJuly for them. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was\nintroduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the\nStenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get\nher formal name. MOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL\nPROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of\nbecome a political target OF; SALLY BAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What\nis more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by\nthe alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t\nmean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and\nthe incidents here are only indicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July\n4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service\naside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in\ntheir pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000.\nI reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my\ntruck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill.\nRyan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed\nand texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at\nleast 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with\nsome preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a\nproper working email. I have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail\nand clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades. I have been proactive in\nobtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing\ncourt clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had\nconcerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did\nnot reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time\nearlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on\n911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside assistance for the\nflat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and\nrun my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products throughout the state, for 7 years\nwhile attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I\nrespect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after\ntactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do\nme and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I\nwill present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court.\nAgain I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs\nby judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth\nworks and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nnamely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations\nhad been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount of\nthis eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful\ninventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he was in fact every\nbit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and\nhe moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle. Accusations came out and Murray denied\nthem. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us\nwho had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong\nwill the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that\nplaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot\nof us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only\nsaid Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the\ncase is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I\nsimply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray\nlies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this apply to our case? In the incident,\nas I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were\ngonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed onsite. I then heard a woman\nfrantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go\nnow just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing she was yet another piece\nof evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a\ncareer politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a\nsenior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she\nhad aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers\npresented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to\nkeep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach,\nprobably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed\nMurray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a\ndisgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy\ncreating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express\nstimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even\nmafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express\nour intended message. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between\nsome things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my\nname tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by\nprofessional contractors. That FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat\nunfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work\nwalking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She\nwas robbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They\nnever caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019.\nI\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a\ndesert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and photos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we\nenjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had\nmy own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting\nvisitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all.\nAbsolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my\nlicense plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it.\nThen Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to\ntry to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and\nshe is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since\n2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a\nformer SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate\nfor me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the\nway the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\n2 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\nHi Ryan,\nWe actually have court today. I am glad your phone is working. Are you able to come to court today?\nThe judge would like you here in person if possible. If not, I can try to get it moved until Wednesday or next Monday\nbut let me know what would work for you.\nThanks,\nOn Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:26 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\n3 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nI have a working phone again. I will try to call you tomorrow around 9am.\nRyan\n(267)777-2344\n4 attachments\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg\n53K\n527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-D3D164A07FFC.jpeg\n54K\nIMG_6448.jpeg\n1435K\nIMG_6452.jpeg\n3778K\n4 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Titus-Warrant-Quash-and-Bagshaw-Ideintified-Feb-14-2025.pdf", "filename": "Titus-Warrant-Quash-and-Bagshaw-Ideintified-Feb-14-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 5.72, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:51.259278", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Also what is our next appearance for this motion. I have an appointment tomorrow but will check here to ensure I don\u2019t\nmiss it\nOn Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:34 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nOk, thanks for the update.", "body": "Also what is our next appearance for this motion. I have an appointment tomorrow but will check here to ensure I don\u2019t\nmiss it\nOn Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:34 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nOk, thanks for the update. Is there anything in these videos pf me making these alleged threats? I will watch them\nmyself now if possible but I would like the short answer:\nAs of last we talked there were no threats made by me in any of the videos you have watched. Can you confirm this\nis the situation still?\nAt any rate I\u2019d like to file the aforementioned Brady motion in response to the prosecutors rebuttal of my\npreservation motion. There are clear reasons why that is pertinent.\nThank you again\nRyannHell\nOn Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 1:10 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nHey Ryan,\nI double checked the Dropbox today and it looks three videos were not uploaded. I have uploaded\nthose, to include the front facing dash camera video, and two others that look like they were not\nuploaded. I also put up a public records request response about the first call which I have uploaded.\nIt does not include the call itself, just the CAD log.\nCourt is at 1:30.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, June 16, 2025 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: State's response to motion\nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the\nJudges Chambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME\nACCESS AND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me\nfor personal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he\ndistinctly says there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:38 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified\nthat any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are\nnot the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy\nall copies of the original message.\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:38 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/SeanEstworthyConfirmingNoThreatsByRyaninVidsAndPlanstoCoachWitnesses-June-18-2025.pdf", "filename": "SeanEstworthyConfirmingNoThreatsByRyaninVidsAndPlanstoCoachWitnesses-June-18-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:44.176201", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: questions@wsba.org\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: questions@wsba.org\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to make\nit off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was not\ncarrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911 service).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to accompany\nthe male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator, and I\nneeded to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle has\nbeen done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as auto\ntheft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\n1 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\nGmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let us\ngo, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an unknown\nfemales voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The man yelled \u201cyou\nhave to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where he is?!\u201d And the\nman yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here trying\nto do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take capture that\nevidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming behaviors and\nconduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They performed a\nbizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front (dash cam I\npresume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm voice that I am non-\ncombative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and made repeated threats\nto shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a mere 20 feet away, broad\ndaylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one more\nword. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I am\ncomplying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said the\nnext time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as I\ncompiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard trying\nto dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and I\nslammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they claimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log) \u201che\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\nGmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ndoesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to let\nme know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to why\nthat delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in. I\npolitely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he wanted\nto part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to come\nview video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was floored by the\negregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on video. The video\nsupports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other than to put my hands\nip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing their\nclaim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/ethicsComplaintMail_WSBA-May-9-2025.pdf", "filename": "ethicsComplaintMail_WSBA-May-9-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:36.027112", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of company\nand home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled B&T of\ncashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving behind my\npickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man eventually\nsurrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and he\nadmitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on and\naired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As it\nwas, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down the\nrabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal residence\u201d. I\ncan\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the mountain\nof discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is the\nfact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non rivercom\nnon CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and commit murder.\nNone of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t seeing what\u2019s\nclearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any moral\nreason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s really\ndumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner campaign\ncontributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he ADOPTED\nthen molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected, there\u2019s been much\nconvo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the office of Seattle mayor?\nCome on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being silenced like this then let\u2019s note\nthat.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly criminal\nactions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure that\naccountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better things\nto do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and constitutional\nrights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence was tampered.\nAnd most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was conspired by\nJeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom operations and\ntechnology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and Wenatchee fire.\nWa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich programmatically\nshould have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t get\nit. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified of\nme roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice to\nshare it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not only\nmake a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/RE-_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "RE-_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:04:27", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer.", "body": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the\nrecord that they are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too\nand would surprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun\npoint onnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this\nwoman who is disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury\nme after they did all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in\nthe face for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager\nand their license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned.\nEver. So far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured\nthey have the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge\npossibly moved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and\nI reluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not\nlying at all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court,\nand it creates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely\ninaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why\nI missed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges\nand the judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes\nto that question. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history.pdf", "filename": "Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:33:33", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nSally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:39 AM\nTo: ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov\nFor times sakes I\u2019ll paste in what I already sent a judicial overbite committee.", "body": "Gmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nSally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:39 AM\nTo: ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov\nFor times sakes I\u2019ll paste in what I already sent a judicial overbite committee. For be out beers a synopsis\nSally Bagshaw traveled to Wenatchee Wa to attempt to trap and execute Ryan Hell and his passenger during a 911 call for emergency aid.\nShe was ordered to flee as deputies arrived I got her on film. Arch nemesis regarding Ed Murray exposure. Do what\u2019s right, is my advice and request.\nAs of now I\u2019m being told they are trying to killlme in custody.\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.\nThis court and primarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial.\nI am presenting evidence of a conflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit murder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll\ncontinue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask you to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect everyone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk\nand murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of July for them.\nSecomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d\nThere was a woman at the seen who was introduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the Stenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to.\nLet\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get her formal name.\nMOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING\nA KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL PROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of become a political target OF;\nSALLY BAGSHAW\nHas direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What is more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by the alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before\nthe cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t mean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and the incidents here are only\nindicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy.\nJuly 4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service aside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her\nhelp is if we went in their pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000. I reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then\nsaid he was robbing me of my truck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill. Ryan was resigned for 3x fel threats.\nInitial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned.\nI have called emailed and texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at least 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State\nbar. I recorded one response with some preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a proper working email.\nI have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail and clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades.\nI have been proactive in obtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing court clerks for Chelan county.\nI have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had concerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did not reply. I\nmentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time earlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on 911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside\nassistance for the flat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and run my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products\nthroughout the state, for 7 years while attending university.\nThe tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I respect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after tactfully defending\nhimself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do me and likely her grave harm.\nSince I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I will present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court. Again I am unable\nto access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs by judge jourdan thru.\nIn 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth works and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events namely\nmolesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations had been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount\nof this eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful inventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he\nwas in fact every bit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and he moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle.\nAccusations came out and Murray denied them. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us who had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we\ncheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong will the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad.\nIn 2017 Delvonn Heckard that plaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot of us felt like it was murder.\nWe discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only said Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the case is sitting\narchives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I simply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray lies\nwent silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned.\nHow does this apply to our case?\nIn the incident, as I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were gonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed\nonsite. I then heard a woman frantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go now just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a\npicture of, knowing she was yet another piece of evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a career politician and political figure of highest order, from\nSeattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a senior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she had aggressively controlled and swayed the\ndiecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers presented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to keep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look\nat this detail\nA former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach, probably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed Murray and fighting fellow councilman to\nkeep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court records now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more VULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented\nthen the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a disgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally.\nI\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy creating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express stimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical\nway to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even mafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express our intended message.\nI try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between some things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out.\nEd Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my name tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by professional contractors. That\nFASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat unfortunately so I dug.\nIn 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work walking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She was\nrobbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They never caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d.\nWe moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019. I\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a desert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and\nphotos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we enjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had my own as well. I was seeing multiple\nvehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting visitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all. Absolutely compliant.\nIt\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my license plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it. Then\nSally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to try to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:27 PM\nGmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nresident and she is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since 2016.\nI didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a former SENIOR PROSECUTOR.\nI was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate for me, my passengers and my type of vehicle.\nI can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the way the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nwww.ryanhell.com\nSeattle Wa\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:27 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/BagshawFleeingScene-ReportedToOmbudsMan.pdf", "filename": "BagshawFleeingScene-ReportedToOmbudsMan.pdf", "size_mb": 2.86, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:25.457996", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Pam Faircloth", "sender_email": "Pam.Faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "publicdisclosure", "recipient_email": "publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org", "date_sent": "Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM", "subject": "Ryan Hell/24-1-00253-04 Hello,", "summary": "Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM\nAttachments: image002.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 1.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 2.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 3.png\nExternal Email Warning! This email originated from outside of Chelan County.", "body": "Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM\nAttachments: image002.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 1.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 2.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 3.png\nExternal Email Warning! This email originated from outside of Chelan County.\nGood Morning Pam,\nHere is the information I can best give you for the attached court order:\nJeremiah Johnson is the Operations Manager of RiverCom 911. Jeremiah began employment in March\n2008 as an Emergency Systems Dispatcher, was promoted to Supervisor in July 2011, then an internal\ntransfer to Radio Systems Technician in June 2017, with his current promotion of Operation Manager in\nJune 2022. Due to Jeremiah\u2019s long standing employment with RiverCom 911, he has a professional\nrelationship with many law enforcement officers but no personal relationships to our knowledge.\nCAD Call logs contain no metadata, RiverCom has confirmed this with the Spillman.\nAttached is the metadata for the 911 audio.\nPlease let me know if you need anything else.\nThank you,\nFrom: Pam Faircloth \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:35 PM\nTo: publicdisclosure \nSubject: Ryan Hell/24-1-00253-04\nHello,\nAttached is the order that we talked about on the phone with regard to what the court ordered our office to\nobtain from your office. As you can see, this order is requesting any additional information on Jeremiah Johnson\u2019s\nemployment with Rivercom and any relationship with law enforcement. The order also states that my office is to\nprovide any metadata with respect to the 911 calls and the CAD log.\nThank you very much for your help.\nPamela L. Faircloth\nParalegal - Felony Division\nChelan County Prosecutors Office\n(509) 667-6659 \u2013 phone\n(509) 667-6490 - fax\npam.faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us\nChelan County blocks all foreign email traffic. If you use Gmail as your email service and I don\u2019t respond to your email in a timely\nmanner, it is highly likely I did not receive your email. Please call me for an alternate way of corresponding.\nConfidentiality Notice: This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. Unless you\nare the intended addressee (or authorized to receive for the intended addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to\nanyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please\nadvise the sender by reply at pam.faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us and delete the message. In addition, all email sent to this\naddress will be received by the Chelan County email system and may be subject to public disclosure and to archiving\nand review.\u201d", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/JohsonsEmploymentStatus-HR-Rivercom.pdf", "filename": "JohsonsEmploymentStatus-HR-Rivercom.pdf", "size_mb": 0.41, "modified": "2026-01-27T02:29:56.985445", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "\"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\"", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nPolice Report\n1 message\nBeto Martinez Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:34 AM\nTo: \"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\" \nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.", "body": "Gmail - Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nPolice Report\n1 message\nBeto Martinez Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:34 AM\nTo: \"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\" \nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\nScan044.pdf\n9631K\n1 of 1 1/24/26, 2:11 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/PoliceReport-JustinTitusAug12-2024.pdf", "filename": "PoliceReport-JustinTitusAug12-2024.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:40.243158", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "heriberto@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 3:43 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nTitus-\nI never got a call I figured you must be extremely busy.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 3:43 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nTitus-\nI never got a call I figured you must be extremely busy. Can we try to get a short call to go over this case this week\nplease? I am in seattle, same address. I guess you said you were not aware of that. I was told I could do video\nhearings until told otherwise. I will call the clerk and try to get it set up from my end, but please let me know asap if\nthere is anything I need to worry about, like being in the cross hairs of a pissed off judge for not driving over to\nwenatchee to attend this hearing. I was honestly told that provided I made one appearance, I would be allowed to do\nvideo court until otherwise stated. I have limited funds and transportation due to the state of damages the tow\ncompany caused on my vehicle while driving it (yes they actually did not TOW my vehicle, they drove it without\nauthorization after I explicitly instructed dispatch as well as Jeremiah that nobody was to touch my vehicle without\nauthorization or without me there.)\nAnyhow, I appreciate your help man. Sorry if I sound frantic but this is a serious thing for a guy like me. And I was\nabsolutely screwed and setup to lock heads by a crooked dispatch center and some unscrupulous folks in the canyon\nthere. I would like to know what my way out is and if I agree to not press charges or sue anyone if they will drop their\nbogus alligation. Not a snowball chance in hell I committed ANY crime, and the trail of really brazen and idiotic actions\non their part is going to be pretty obvious even if they all wear badges and call themselves saints and heros or\nwhatever. Im sorry but these folks went to great lengths to STEAL from me and then they imprisoned the very person\nwhom I was calling for medical aid for. This wasnt about a tow dispute. It was never about that. They tried to make a\nbuck on that and I stepped around that and asked for my friend; who was being held in their garage. The actual\nthreats were made to me, by the female as well as Jeremiah. The tow truck driver had tried to get me to pay \"1,000\ncash\" and I eventually said \"you were never authorized to do anything to my vehicle. You have no legal right to just\ntake someones vehicle and perform a mock repair service then demand money or threaten to keep it. We can sort this\nout with a judge but I need my friend so we can leave\". Tow driver spit and swore and called me names trying to start\na fight. He turned to Jeremiah the homeowner and threw my keys to him and said \"I dont want nothing to do with this\npiece of shit\". I waited and stared at Jeremiah, who had some back and forth with tow operator who held his ground\nand persisted that he wanted nothing to do with my truck. I smiled and said \"now give me my keys so we can leave,\nplease\". Jeremiah was outraged and said exactly \"you aint getting your truck back.\" I said \"maybe not today, but we\ncan deal with that later then. So youre not giving me my truck back?\" Jeremiah simply answered \"fuck you. We tried to\nhelp you\". I said \"no, you tried to scam me. Thank god Im not stupid and know some law. Me and my friend will leave\non foot. I'm confident Ill be compensated nicely for my vehicle should it be damaged or disappear between now and\nthe time we get to state patrol where we are going for help.\". Jeremiah said \"you arent going anywhere.\" I said \"yes I\nam. And my friend is too.\" Jeremiah said \"shes with us, she is not leaving\". I asked to speak to her and they said no.\nAt this point I am starting to think things are so far from the normal peramiter, and well into serious felony conduct\nby city workers.... this is a recipe for me to end up dead. I was unable to call for help. I made 3 additional 911 calls\nwhich were all fielded by the same female dispatcher. I asked to speak with state patrol and she said she could not\npatch me through. She said she isnt an operator. I stated that I am facing a situation where I believe me and\nespecially my sick friend who needed aid, were facing loss of life if a nuetral third party leo cannot be brought on the\nline. Dispatch hung up on me. Jeremiah stated at about that time, that he had contacted his friend who is a Chelan\ndeputy. They were on the way. I asked for what? He said you threatened to shoot the place up. I laughed i thought he\nwas joking. Not something I would say. Not to mention I am not even mad at all throughout all of this. They were\nfuming pissed, not me.\nYou see; I made a standard call for emergency medical attention for a 60 year old type 2 diabetic who was going\ninto insulin shock. They instead drove us outside of cell service, seperated us then tried to extort me with my vehicle\nafter they STOLE it from where I parked it.\nFurther, Jeremiah's wife, who is also a dispatcher at Riverside EMS center with Jeremiah; she was the nastiest of\nthis group. All exhibited some seriously shady conduct but it is my observation thatboth Jeremiah as well as the tow\noperators; were pushed into this incident reluctently, by the female spouse, homeowner. She chastised tow operator\nwhen he relinquished my vehicle. She also had to repeatedly prod Jeremiah to follow thru. At the beginning of it as we\nsat in his garage thinking they were helping us.... she turned mean without reason; and left the room to yell at\n1 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nJermeiah. He came back with a change of clothes, he had donned fire fighter gear.... and she scolded him yet again\nand he went once more inside the house, this time he came out with a Wenatchee city shirt and hat on. And then the\nneighbor drove over to jeremiahs right next door, driving a red hummer which I recognize as a parade truck....and he\nhad the light bar on the entire time. I got video of that.\nThen the tow truck showed up and they were in a newer International roll back style tow truck, bright red color\ntruck; with signage which said \"BCR Towing, Cashmere\" or some 3 letter name I think, I need to check the pics for\nthat though. It definately was not Mountain Towing thiugh, seems like that discrepency in the police report should\nmatter though...\nAnyhow.... on the TOW TRUCK was a SxS ATV... great big thing like polaris RZr or something. A man was driving\nmy truck behind the tow truck as he pulled in. Jeremiah instructed me to go back in the garage but I came back out\nquickly and seen the tow truck was offloading the atv and the red parade HUMMER was now positioned sideways sort\nof blocking me...I told jeremiah that I never authoried any of this and I will pay for the help, but just like I told dispathc\non the intial call; I DONT HAVE MUCH MONEY.\nTow driver orders me to his truck and he sat inside and wouldnt make eye contact with me, I knew what was next. I\nasked \"how did you get my truck? He said \"we found the keys to it inside nd we bought a new tire and wheel for it.\nThen he said \"You owe me 1,000 dollars.\" CASH ONLY. I inspected the wheel and tire they provided. It was off of\nanother ford suv likely. The wheel was much smaller and a lot different. The tire was dry rotted. To make matters\nworse they drove my vehicle with one of the other tires completely flat also, destroying nother wheel nd tire.\nEventually when I was in jail, they simply handed the keys over to my friend and said head out. She broke down with\ntwo flats on snoqualmie pass. Luckilu. Upon being delivered to seattle by tow truck, the wheels they slapped on (mine)\nwere not even hand tightened, Lugs were missing. The clutch was completely shot and worse yet, the transmission\nhad catastrophic problem now too requiring a new transmission, all documented by tow and certified transmission\nshop.\nThese people prayed on me.These people endangered my friend multiple times in many ways. These people likely\nplotted to kill mewhen they realized they were not going to have an easy time with me as a target or mark for their\npathetic and SHAMEFUL scam.\nAs much as I want to move on; here we sit with this absurd case of a bunch of idiot hicks who tried to pull a shameful\nscam on stranded motorist amidst a medical emergency\nNO AMBULANCE WAS EVER CALLED\nNO EMT EVER TRIAGED MY FRIEND\nI imagine they will slice and dice this ten ways from sunday and try to totally bury me.... Im not mad though...honestly\nBecause I know I am not a vile POS who prayed on two disabled people who were calling for medical help after being\ntricked into a detour which LIKELY was carefully layed out by the same scumbags.\nJeremiah tried to have me killed by the arresting officer. And they were likely about to do it when I spasmed and\ncollapsed due to the severe agony and dehydration caused by frantially digging and pushing my truck out of 20+ miles\nof destert hard pan and shale rock, on a bare steel wheel under 90+ degree heat with no water and my trucks heat is\non full blast always and has been for years.\nThis isnt something I want to persue but you have some very very sick people who fucked up bad. I am pretty sure the\ncourts and all else must be complicit since the raw merits and evidence of this entire case point straight to my defense\nand its pretty obvious what has gone on out there. The fact this is dragging out to a court trial against ME is another\ncriminal matter entirely in and of itself. Seems the judge might not have seen much of this case yet or he would\nquickly throw it out. Because there enough evidence to criminally charge about a half dozen Cheland court personnel\nwho were present.\nI just want to move on. Not looking to sue anyone. Not looking for payback. This is a painful reminder that the\nauthorities are not our friends as citizens. And also scumbags will often call themselves \"good samaritans\" while\nextorting people. Eben while they are in need of emergency medical attention.\n-Ryan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:35 AM Beto Martinez wrote:\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/titus_noshow-phoneMeeting-sep22-2024.pdf", "filename": "titus_noshow-phoneMeeting-sep22-2024.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:48.399247", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated\nthe threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this\nseems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since\nthe alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make\nthat they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/shawnEstworthy.pdf", "filename": "shawnEstworthy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:50", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "justin@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are. Since it\u2019s clear to me that\nI am being denied equal justice I want to highlight some concerns and reasons followed by my desired outcomes or\nsolutions. I appreciate you taking the no one to read this.\nI haven\u2019t had any significant time to get acquainted with the cases evidence witnesses or discuss even preliminary high\nlevel defense strategies. This case stems back to July 4th so I think it should be obvious that it\u2019s bothering you\nsomehow to do so, and either way it\u2019s too serious for me to give you any more chances.\nWe have agreed to talk dozens of times and I have yet to really get a quality conversation with you to shape up the case\nfor trial, and hear we are already facing readiness.. again.\nI\u2019ve left multiple emails and text and calls; dozens trying to get b the court date confirmed and you would not reply\nback. What\u2019s stranger is the court clerks told me I could not obtain my court date info with no case number and they\nconstantly refer me to you. It\u2019s almost like I\u2019m being manipulated and gas lighted and it all feels very immature and\nchildish to say the least.\nToday\u2019s ordeal of being scolded about missing TEO dates when the date I had last noted was the 18th\u2026 this isn\u2019t my\nstyle. I do my homework. I\u2019m on time. I graduated Cum Laud in an accredited engineering school. Worked my through\nduel majors in info science. Slouch I am not. And don\u2019t like being mistreated and lied to.\nThis case is a wonderful mess and it very likely has some officials in Wenatchee and probably Seattle also; sweating.\nNot my intention but also not at all my fault, either.\nYou see I simply called for medical help for my disabled friend and we were told our only option was to get on a personal\ncar with strangers\u2026 and being the good hearted person of trusting faith who I am; I no was taken for a ride.. no pun\nintended.\nI surmise we were lucky n to escape alive and I have some key details which are illustrated by the \u201cvictims\u201d own\nstatement, photographs and probably the 911 call recordings which is another issue entirely.\nI\u2019ve demonstrated that there were nefarious bad actors in this event. People who targeted us before we even called for\nthe ambulance. Then I s things escalated there was an unknown person who was ushered out the back door and\ncoached to flee fast before the police arrived. This woman as it turns out, was\nSALLY BAGSHAW. Former senior prosecutor and city council in Seattle. Embattled representative who aggressively\nprotected Ed Murray even after his incredibly I disgusting history of pedophilia accusations made by African American\nFoster Children.\nThere seems to be a pattern here with these people.\nViolate public trust\nGas light victims\nPlay victim while doing horribly things\nAccuse the accusers of being the culprits\nWithout a doubt Sally Bagshaw will have to get real creative to explain what she was doing at that crummy ranch house\nand why she attempted to flee before police arrived.\nOne of the main reasons this case cannot proceed until I formally have a chance to obtain new counsel;\nThe court staff I pointed out our first day\u2026 superior court stenographer. She was actually involved in the rouse.\nThe merits of the case I feel, represent a clear case of kidnapping and extortion. We were told the only way my friend\nwouldn\u2019t die, is if we got into these folks car. Initially dispatch also lied and said we were going to be picked up by city\ncouncilman. Instead it was rather more dispatchers for the questionable Riverside.\nIn addition they interfered with a medical duress call.\nAnd most disturbing of all\nIn the reports and statements; they made multiple attempts to get me to leave alone. Without my passenger who\nneeded insulin.\nNo sense in claiming they had intended to help her because they never did get her medical attention. So that\u2019s not why.\nI believe the plan was to kill her then chase me down and kill me, then create a false report that I fled the scene after\nkilling g her. Or even worse yet, kill her then arrest me and blame me for the murder.\nOne thing surely though; she wasn\u2019t being held onto for ransom. Or conversation. Or humor. Or money.\nI know in my heart that the plan in Wenatchee called for death to at least one of us, and then incarceration or death to\nthe other (myself). That makes me incredibly sick and I\u2019ve been perplexed by the revelations this past uear in the things\nI\u2019ve discovered afoot around me.\nIt\u2019s sick! And I am not sitting down quietly, I have tactfully presented my findings to a variety of agencies and entities\nand my goal is I to eradicate these criminally corrupt city I people so no more innocent people are harmed.\nI am asking respectfullyfor two things:\n1:) your resignation from this case; and I presume you are released to hear that. I get it. No hard feelings.\n2:) formal request for change of venue due to excessive concerns of witnesses and personell with conflict of interest;\nA) stenographer\nB) Riverside dispatcher #1\nC) Riverside Dispatcher #2\nD) Riverside dispatcher #3\nThese people occupy N salaried positions within the very same courthouse as the halls of justice I am no expected to\npress my case before; and I think it\u2019s foolish to pretend there will be a fair trial of held in Chelan or Douglas.\nI\u2019d hope for some place like Olympia since we now have emerging evidence of a major political scandal amidst this case.\nI\u2019d request to be in the presence of a jury and court personnel who can ensure integrity with a jury trial which involves\nsophisticated deep state orientated bad actors and brazen corruption, disdain for justice, and a sort of grand\nmalfeasance which most mid sized communities are scared to approach.\nThe only Good Samaritan that day was myself.\nI will continue to comply with court directives and I won\u2019t miss any hearings but I have to have access to proper\nchannels in order to learn what my obligations are. I feel like I probably sound patronizing when I say things like that, but\nI can\u2019t see any other way to express that without having access to a lawyer or being told n when new court dates are\nscheduled; I can\u2019t see how I am expected to show up.\nFurther; it\u2019s my understanding the original al court date was on the 5th. I missed that not knowing so they scheduled me\na new court date for today. How am I supposed to know that?\nThe gist I of it all feels like I\u2019m being toyed with by a judge that has some sort of childish vendetta for me. Which is\npretty sad since I have no prior experience with any of you. And if my free speach offended you this much, you folks\npicked the wrong profession. Because this country and our bygone laws as well as our spirit moving forward; are\nfounded firmly around this Nations unrivaled no holds barred FREEDOM OF SPEACH.\nI\u2019m not sure where you learned but I have no doubt t you must have studied more law then I have; but one of my\nmost formative experiences was a Jewish Holocaust survivor I had for a teacher in grade school; and she spent an entire\nweek covering the topic at that time in the 1980\u2019s, about Skinheads and the Aryann Nation, the KKK etc. As kids we\ncouldn\u2019t believe it was tolerated. \u201cSurely it\u2019s illegal!\u201d. No, it\u2019s not. She explained. She went on to quote and provide\nexamples illustrating how the country can only hold up free speech rights by protecting the most hated speech first.\nAnd she taught us that she doesn\u2019t care for it but she doesn\u2019t have to. And it\u2019s not her life she doesn\u2019t have to live that\nway. They do. It doesn\u2019t bother her.\nI\u2019m no right winger. Not racist. I do have concerns about pedophiles grooming school kids. I do have concerns with\nphony liberals and vocalize them. But that\u2019s because I was raised in an established democratic family and felt they failed\nto do the right thing g too many times. And to be honest it was just this sort of dishonest conduct.\nFor the level of contempt one of two things is occurring. You all are spending too much time n on my social media where\nI\u2019ve been bound to whole undergoing this trial. Or you have a particularly right wing mind set, regardless of party\nidentify. We are all fluid social animals. Don\u2019t get hu g up on my personal life of acting a fool online to pass time etc.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case_2.pdf", "filename": "Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:31:53", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/heidi.pdf", "filename": "heidi.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-03T23:38:46", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Chelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nComplaint-25- CAD Incident\nLanguage English Complaint # 2410025304\n00031 #\nDate of Time of\n12/15/25 1152\nComplaint Complaint\nIndividual Filing the Complaint (Ryan Hell)\nEnter your personal information so we may contact you directly if our investigators have any additional\nquestions and to notify you upon completion of our investigation. You may remain anonymous by checking the appropriate checkbox if you wish, however, we will have\nno means to notify you of the outcome of the investigation.", "body": "Chelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nComplaint-25- CAD Incident\nLanguage English Complaint # 2410025304\n00031 #\nDate of Time of\n12/15/25 1152\nComplaint Complaint\nIndividual Filing the Complaint (Ryan Hell)\nEnter your personal information so we may contact you directly if our investigators have any additional\nquestions and to notify you upon completion of our investigation.\nYou may remain anonymous by checking the appropriate checkbox if you wish, however, we will have\nno means to notify you of the outcome of the investigation. If you complete this form on behalf of\nanother, please provide your information in addition to the individual's information on whose behalf you\nsubmitting this complaint.\nComplainant is a\nNo\nminor/needs help.\nI want to remain\nanonymous.\nFirst Name Ryan Middle Name Michael Last Name Hell\n11015 10th ave\nAddress City Seattle State WA\nsw\n267-777-2344 267-777-2344\nZip 98144 Home phone Cell phone\nx_____ x_____\nryanbrooklyn202\nAdditional phone Email Additional Email\n0@gmail.com\nDate of Birth 01/09/78 Age 47 Race White\nDriver\u2019s License\nGender Male WDL686B5123B Disability No\n#\nPrimary Are you able to\nBest time to\nanytime Language English communicate in Yes\ncontact?\nSpoken English?\nArrested? Yes Citation Number 2410025304\nInjury Information\nWas complainant\ninjured during the Yes\nincident?\nDid you seek\nType of Injury Unknown Severity of Injury Unknown medical Yes\nattention?\nDoctor Information\nDoctor\u2019s Name Doctor\u2019s Phone\nAttorney Information\nAttorney's Name Attorney's Phone\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 1 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nEmployee ( )\nPlease enter any information of the employee(s) who you are complaining on. if you do not know the\ninvolved employee's name or ID number, please describe them as best as possible as this will assist\nthe Department in identifying the employee.\nEmployee Information\nEmployee #\nFirst name Middle name Last name\nAge Race Gender\nIn Uniform\nDescription of\nEmployee\nVehicle Information\nVehicle Make Vehicle Model Vehicle Color\nVehicle\nVehicle Number\nCharacteristics\nIncident\nDate of Incident\nDate of Incident Day of Incident Time of Incident\nIncident Location\nAddress City State\nZip\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 2 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nEVIDENCE OF INTENTIONAL ALTERED AND TAMPERED SHERIFFS DASH CAM FOOTAGE\nOn July 4th 2024 myself and a DISABLED passenger were legally camping in a DESIGNATED\nDiscovery Campground on 3rd of July, with her companion dogs. We found ourselves\nsrtranded due to flat tires and my passenger informed me then that she had not brought\nher insulin. I spent nearly 6 hours desperartely racing to get us out of the deseert\nenvironment back to road saftey and cell service and ultimately became stuck. I called\n911 and was told no help woul;d come and my only choice was to allow volunteers to\ntake us to a house to meet an ambulance. Some 45 minutes later a truck with man and\nwoman arrive and oidentified themselves as volunteers and they raced past the turn off\nfor wenatchee and toojk us further into another isolated area to a remote house where\nthey held us eventuially seperated us, had someone steal my truck then show uop\nDRIVING it dem,anding CASH, later they demanded cash also.\nIncident Description\nI WAS ASSAULTED. NO AMBULANCE EVER CAME. ARRESTED ON FALSE CHARGES. TRUCK\nRELEASED TO PASSENGER.\nDeputies lied abnout tow truck name I can prove that also.\nThe tow present and in photos and video was B&T towing of cashmere wa, and that\ncompany was out of business. Further, in the sheriff video Jeremaiah Johnson of Rivercom\nwho effectively is the kidnapper, in legal terms, who dressed in disguise then misled us\nand took us to this property where he and the out of busienss tow truck attempted to\nextort me for cash for a tow / repair, and later for a \"rescue\", Jermeiah admitted to the\nsheriff dfeputy ON VIDEO that he called B&T Towing. TH edeputy was aware yet he falsely\nreported Mountain View Towing was there.\nMy biggest immediate problem I demand answers to are the AI tampered videos.\nSupporting\nPhoto\nDocumentation\nAttachment(s) supporting complaint:\nFile Name Size Date\nAdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27\n3028 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n2947092forensicanalysis\nZachBrunner_202407041759_1310_6764\n3033 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n26832forensicanalysis\nAdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27\n3039 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n294709___unkmnownVERforensicanalysis\nZachBrunner_202407041759_1310_6764\n3033 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n26832forensicanalysis\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 3 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\n12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 4 Of 4\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Chelan-County-Online-Complaint-25-00031.pdf", "filename": "Chelan-County-Online-Complaint-25-00031.pdf", "size_mb": 0.48, "modified": "2026-01-27T02:29:55.505430", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM\nGmail - Urgent: Brady Motion and Hearing Prep https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that\nany unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies\nof the original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/BradyMotionClarificationForSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "filename": "BradyMotionClarificationForSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:27.422018", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nStatus on conflict of interest with court personnel\nRyan Hell Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 4:12 AM\nTo: \nBrian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nStatus on conflict of interest with court personnel\nRyan Hell Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 4:12 AM\nTo: \nBrian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of company\nand home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled B&T of\ncashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving behind my\npickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man eventually\nsurrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and he\nadmitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on and\naired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As it\nwas, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down the\nrabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal residence\u201d. I\ncan\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the mountain\nof discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is the\nfact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non rivercom\nnon CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and commit murder.\nNone of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t seeing what\u2019s\nclearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any moral\nreason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s really\ndumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner campaign\ncontributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he ADOPTED\nthen molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected, there\u2019s been much\nconvo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the office of Seattle mayor?\nCome on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being silenced like this then let\u2019s note\nthat.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly criminal\nactions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure that\naccountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better things\nto do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and constitutional\nrights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence was tampered.\nAnd most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was conspired by\nJeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom operations and\ntechnology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and Wenatchee fire.\nWa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich programmatically\nshould have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t get\nit. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified of\nme roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice to\nshare it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not only\nmake a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:30:01", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah, and\nalso known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her status\nas an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah, and\nalso known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her status\nas an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed to me\nbut the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong doing\nand expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls contrary to the\nclaim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position that\nyou did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this information.\nTampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts (although\nthis would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting are crimes.\nThere are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and have no ability\nto charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who can charge a\nfelony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on prosecutors and\ngovernments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy, evidence. Certainly,\ndespite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set people up. I just do not\nsee that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several poeple, typically police,\nworking outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not generally a multi-agency\ncoverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple police, a person or persons\nwho can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data there, and the tow truck\ncompany. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and freedom (as these would all\nbe clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I really just do not see that\nhappening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms of evidence, they did not\nbother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial regarding the alleged threats\nthemselves will have to come from their testimony.\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for rivercom\n911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked for\nrivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it doesn\u2019t\ncontain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke to had\nflatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and she\npersisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are\nabsolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively\ndismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this lady\nas a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally laughed\nand said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a trick\nto get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for help.\nThis constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT STANS\nMOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys are LYING\nabout the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s everyone\u2019s\noops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill dispute and\nsubsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and on the\nrecord please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter\nthe timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And\nthe implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but\nyou is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they\nkept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical\nand think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:17:31", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Find related posts... Powered by Algolia Log in Create account\nShoubhit Dash\nShoubhit Dash\nPosted on Aug 11, 2022 \u2022 Updated on Mar 28, 2023\n81\nFollow\n65 16\nAdd\nreaction\nBuild a full stack app with Hi, I'm Shoubhit.", "body": "Find related posts... Powered by Algolia Log in Create account\nShoubhit Dash\nShoubhit Dash\nPosted on Aug 11, 2022 \u2022 Updated on Mar 28, 2023\n81\nFollow\n65 16\nAdd\nreaction\nBuild a full stack app with Hi, I'm Shoubhit. I'm a 17 y/o self-taught\ndeveloper and I like to build cool stuff.\n20\nJump to\ncreate-t3-app JOINED\nComments\nMar 11, 2022\n67\n#webdev #nextjs #tutorial\nSave\nMore from Shoubhit Dash\nThis blog post is outdated. I no longer have time to keep updating this post.\nWhy I Switched From Neovim to VSCode\nHey there! Today we'll be building an application with the T3 stack. We're going #webdev #programming #vscode #vim\nto build a Guestbook inspired by Lee Robinson's Guestbook. Let's get right into\nImplementing the Pipe Operator in\nit!\nTypeScript\n#typescript #functional #programming #tutorial\nGetting Started\nLet's set up a starter project with create-t3-app ! Typesafe Database Queries on the Edge\n#typescript #sql #webdev\nnpm create t3-app@latest\nAxiom PROMOTED\nWe're going to utilize all parts of the stack.\n?Whatwillyourprojectbecalled?guestbook\n?WillyoubeusingJavaScriptorTypeScript?TypeScript\nGoodchoice!UsingTypeScript!\n?Whichpackageswouldyouliketoenable?nextAuth,prisma,tailwind,trpc\n?Initializeanewgitrepository?Yes\nNiceone!Initializingrepository!\nSampling is an anti-pattern\n?Wouldyoulikeustorunppminstall?Yes\npromoted by Big\nAlright.We'llinstallthedependenciesforyou!\nObservability\nUsing:pnpm\nEasy. Understandable. Affordable. Log it all.\nLet's also set up a Postgres database on Railway. Railway makes it super simple\nLog it now.\nto quickly set up a database.\nLog it with Axiom\nGo to Railway and log in with GitHub if you haven't already. Now click on\nNew\n.\nProject\nNow provision Postgres.\nIt's as simple as that. Copy the connection string from the tab.\nConnect\nLet's start coding! Open the project in your favourite code editor.\nThere are a lot of folders but don't be overwhelmed. Here's a basic overview.\n- The schema.\nprisma/* prisma\n- Static assets including fonts and images.\npublic/*\n- Validation for environment variables.\nsrc/env/*\n- All the pages of the website.\nsrc/pages/*\n- The backend, which includes a tRPC server, Prisma client,\nsrc/server/*\nand auth utility.\n- Global CSS files, but we're going to be using Tailwind CSS\nsrc/styles/*\nfor most of our styles.\n- Next Auth type declarations.\nsrc/types/*\n- Utility functions.\nsrc/utils/*\nDuplicate the file and rename the new copy as . Open the\n.env.example .env\nfile and paste the connection string in .\n.env DATABASE_URL\nYou'll notice we have Discord OAuth set up using , so we also need a\nnext-auth\nand . Let's set that up.\nDISCORD_CLIENT_ID DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET\nSetting up authentication\nGo to the Discord Developers Portal and create a new application.\nGo to and add all of the callback URLs to . For\nOAuth2/General Redirects\nlocalhost the callback URL is\n. I also added the\nhttp://localhost:3000/api/auth/callback/discord\nproduction URL ahead of time.\nCopy the client ID and secret and paste both of them into .\n.env\nUncomment and set it as some random string too. Now we\nNEXTAUTH_SECRET\nhave all of our environment variables configured.\nLet's also change the database to and uncomment the\npostgresql @db.Text\nannotations in the model in . All the models you\nAccount prisma/schema.prisma\nsee in the schema are necessary for Next Auth to work.\nLet's push this schema to our Railway Postgres database. This command will\npush our schema to Railway and generate type definitions for the Prisma client.\nnpx prisma db push\nNow run the dev server.\nnpm run dev\nGo to the file and delete all the code, let's just render a\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\nheading.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst Home = () => {\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nI can't look at light themes, so lets apply some global styles in\nto make this app dark theme.\nsrc/styles/globals.css\n/* src/styles/globals.css */\n@tailwind base;\n@tailwind components;\n@tailwind utilities;\nbody {\n@apply bg-neutral-900 text-neutral-100;\n}\nMuch better.\nIf you look at , you can see we have\nsrc/pages/api/auth/[...nextauth].ts\nDiscord OAuth already set up using Next Auth. Here is where you can add more\nOAuth providers like Google, Twitter, etc.\nNow let's create a button to let users login with Discord. We can use the\nfunction from Next Auth.\nsignIn()\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nWe can use the hook to get the session for the user. While we're\nuseSession()\nat it, we can also use the function to implement log out functionality.\nsignOut()\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn, signOut, useSession } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nif (status === \"loading\") {\nreturn
Loading...
;\n}\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nGIF\nGreat! We now have auth working. Next Auth really makes it stupidly simple.\nBackend\nLet's work on the backend now. We'll be using tRPC for our API layer and\nPrisma for connecting and querying our database.\nWe're going to have to modify our prisma schema and add a model.\nGuestbook\nEach message in the guestbook will have a name and a message. Here's how\nthe model will look like.\nmodel Guestbook {\nid String @id @default(cuid())\ncreatedAt DateTime @default(now())\nname String\nmessage String @db.VarChar(100)\n}\nLet's push this modified schema to our Railway Postgres database.\nnpx prisma db push\nNow let's get to the fun part - it's tRPC time. Go ahead and delete the\nfile in folder. Then in the same folder,\nexample.ts src/server/api/routers\ncreate a new file called .\nguestbook.ts\nFirst, we're going to define a mutation to post messages to our database.\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, publicProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\npostMessage: publicProcedure\n.input(\nz.object({\nname: z.string(),\nmessage: z.string(),\n})\n)\n.mutation(async ({ ctx, input }) => {\ntry {\nawait ctx.prisma.guestbook.create({\ndata: {\nname: input.name,\nmessage: input.message,\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(error);\n}\n}),\n});\nHere we have a tRPC mutation that uses zod to validate the input and has an\nasync function that runs a single prisma query to create a new row in the\ntable.\nGuestbook\nWorking with Prisma is an absolutely wonderful example. The autocomplete and\ntypesafety is amazing.\nWe also want this mutation to be protected. Here we can use tRPC\nmiddlewares.\nIf you take a look at the file, we're using\nsrc/server/auth.ts\nfrom Next Auth that gives us access to the session\nunstable_getServerSession\non the server.\n// src/server/auth.ts\nimport { type GetServerSidePropsContext } from \"next\";\nimport { unstable_getServerSession } from \"next-auth\";\nimport { authOptions } from \"../pages/api/auth/[...nextauth]\";\nexport const getServerAuthSession = async (ctx: {\nreq: GetServerSidePropsContext[\"req\"];\nres: GetServerSidePropsContext[\"res\"];\n}) => {\nreturn await unstable_getServerSession(ctx.req, ctx.res, authOptions);\n};\nWe're passing that session into our tRPC context.\n// src/server/api/trpc.ts\nexport const createTRPCContext = async (opts: CreateNextContextOptions) => {\nconst { req, res } = opts;\nconst session = await getServerAuthSession({ req, res });\nreturn createInnerTRPCContext({\nsession,\n});\n};\nThen, we can use this session to make our mutation protected using a\n.\nprotectedProcedure\n// src/server/api/trpc.ts\nconst enforceUserIsAuthed = t.middleware(({ ctx, next }) => {\nif (!ctx.session || !ctx.session.user) {\nthrow new TRPCError({ code: \"UNAUTHORIZED\" });\n}\nreturn next({\nctx: {\nsession: { ...ctx.session, user: ctx.session.user },\n},\n});\n});\nexport const protectedProcedure = t.procedure.use(enforceUserIsAuthed);\nNow, replace with to make our mutation\npublicProcedure protectedProcedure\nprotected from unauthenticated users.\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, protectedProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\npostMessage: protectedProcedure\n.input(\nz.object({\nname: z.string(),\nmessage: z.string(),\n})\n)\n.mutation(async ({ ctx, input }) => {\ntry {\nawait ctx.prisma.guestbook.create({\ndata: {\nname: input.name,\nmessage: input.message,\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(error);\n}\n}),\n});\nNext, let's write a query to get all messages in the guestbook. We want all\nguests to see the messages so we'll use the for this.\npublicProcedure\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, protectedProcedure, publicProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\ngetAll: publicProcedure.query(async ({ ctx }) => {\ntry {\nreturn await ctx.prisma.guestbook.findMany({\nselect: {\nname: true,\nmessage: true,\n},\norderBy: {\ncreatedAt: \"desc\",\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(\"error\", error);\n}\n}),\n//...\nHere we are getting just the name and message from all the rows from the\nmodel. The rows are sorted in descending order by the\nGuestbook createdAt\nfield.\nNow merge this router in the main .\nappRouter\n// src/server/api/root.ts\nimport { createTRPCRouter } from \"./trpc\";\nimport { guestbookRouter } from \"./routers/guestbook\";\nexport const appRouter = createTRPCRouter({\nguestbook: guestbookRouter,\n});\n// export type definition of API\nexport type AppRouter = typeof appRouter;\nWe're pretty much done on the backend part. Let's work on the UI next.\nFrontend\nLet's first center everything.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn, signOut, useSession } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nif (status === \"loading\") {\nreturn
Loading...
;\n}\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n

\nTutorial for create-t3-app\n

\n
\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n
\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nI also made the heading bigger and added some padding between the\nelements.\nLet's use our tRPC query to get all the messages for the guestbook in the\ndatabase. But we don't have any data right now. We can use Prisma Studio to\nadd some data manually.\nnpx prisma studio\nIt will automatically open on . Go to the table\nhttp://localhost:5555 Guestbook\nand add a bunch of records like this.\nGIF\nNow that we have data, we can use the query and display the data. For this we\ncan use the tRPC wrapper. Let's create a component for this in\nreact-query\n.\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { api } from \"../utils/api\";\nconst GuestbookEntries = () => {\nconst { data: guestbookEntries, isLoading } = api.guestbook.getAll.useQuery();\nif (isLoading) return
Fetching messages...
;\nreturn (\n
\n{guestbookEntries?.map((entry, index) => {\nreturn (\n
\n

{entry.message}

\n- {entry.name}\n
\n);\n})}\n
\n);\n};\nHere we're using and mapping over the array it returns.\nuseQuery()\nOf course here too we have wonderful typesafety and autocomplete.\nNow render this component in the component.\nHome\n// src/pages/index.tsx\n
\n

Guestbook

\n

\nTutorial for create-t3-app\n

\n
\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\nLet's now create a form component in and use our tRPC\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\nmutation there.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst Form = () => {\nconst [message, setMessage] = useState(\"\");\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nconst postMessage = api.guestbook.postMessage.useMutation();\nif (status !== \"authenticated\") return null;\nreturn (\n {\nevent.preventDefault();\npostMessage.mutate({\nname: session.user?.name as string,\nmessage,\n});\nsetMessage(\"\");\n}}\n>\n setMessage(event.target.value)}\n/>\n\nSubmit\n\n\n);\n};\nWe can now render the in the component and add some padding.\nForm Home\n// src/pages/index.tsx\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n\n
\n
\nHere we have a form and we're using to post the data to the\nuseMutation()\ndatabase. But you'll notice one problem here. When we click on the submit\nbutton, it does post the message to the database, but the user doesn't get any\nimmediate feedback. Only on refreshing the page, the user can see the new\nmessage.\nFor this we can use optimistic UI updates! makes this trivial to do.\nreact-query\nWe just need to add some stuff to our hook inside the\nuseMutation() Form\ncomponent.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst utils = api.useContext();\nconst postMessage = api.guestbook.postMessage.useMutation({\nonMutate: async (newEntry) => {\nawait utils.guestbook.getAll.cancel();\nutils.guestbook.getAll.setData(undefined, (prevEntries) => {\nif (prevEntries) {\nreturn [newEntry, ...prevEntries];\n} else {\nreturn [newEntry];\n}\n});\n},\nonSettled: async () => {\nawait utils.guestbook.getAll.invalidate();\n},\n});\nIf you want to learn more about this code example, you can read about\noptimistic updates with here.\n@tanstack/react-query\nWe're pretty much done with the coding part! That was pretty simple wasn't it.\nThe T3 stack makes it super easy and quick to build full stack web apps. Let's\nnow deploy our guestbook.\nDeployment\nWe're going to use Vercel to deploy. Vercel makes it really easy to deploy\nNextJS apps, they are the people who made NextJS.\nFirst, push your code to a GitHub repository. Now, go to Vercel and sign up with\nGitHub if you haven't already.\nThen click on and import your newly created repository.\nNew Project\nNow we need to add environment variables, so copy paste all the environment\nvariables to Vercel. After you've done that, click .\nDeploy\nAdd a custom domain if you have one and you're done! Congratulations!\nAll the code can be found here. You can visit the website at guestbook.nxl.sh.\nCredits\nAyanava Karmakar for updating the blog using tRPC v10.\nJulius Marminge and Michael Lee for reviewing the updated blog.\nLee Robinson for the idea of a guestbook.\nAnthony for giving constructive criticism.\nJAR and Krish for proof reading.\nHakan G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc for updating the project files in accordance with the latest\ntemplate (7.3.0).\ncreate-t3-app\nBefore you go\nDo your career a big favor. Join DEV. (The website you're on right now)\nIt takes one minute, it's free, and is worth it for your career.\nGet started\nCommunity matters\nTop comments (20)\nSubscribe\nThe discussion has been locked. New comments can't be added.\nBlog post is outdated\nJoel Almeida \u2022 Sep 11 '22\nThanks a lot for this tutorial! It's very helpful. One thing I would add that I got\nstuck on for a little bit is that you have to run after creating\nprisma generate\nyour schema before you can access the prisma client.\n3 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nYou're welcome!\nautomatically runs for you. Weird it didn't\nprisma db push prisma generate\nwork for you.\n1 like\nLike\nJoel Almeida \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nThat is really strange! I had run , I could see everything\nprisma db push\non railway no problem, but the client didn't work until I also ran\nprisma\n, so yeah, no idea what that's about\ngenerate\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nGlad you got it working!\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Hayes \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nI appreciate the work put in, but to anyone visiting this after March 2023 you\nwill have a hard time following along with this as the folder structures have\nchanged considerably in create-t3-app.\nIt would be really good if you could release an updated version, as this is the\npretty much the first tutorial that pops up in google when you look for a\n(written) t3 tutorial.\nThe big issue is Typescript errors with the return types from your queries. If\nyou follow along to the letter of this tutorial you will be hit by so many red\nlines!\nJust leaving this here for future readers....\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nHey! I know ct3a has changed a lot since this blog post, but with college\napplications and entrance exams right around the corner, I don't have a lot\nof time to keep updating this post and usually rely on the community to\nmake a PR on my website's repo. From there I also update the content on\ndev.to. If you are free enough to update stuff that is broken, feel free to\nmake a PR on my website's repo and I'll update the content here as well.\nThe code is in this repository.\nSorry for not keeping this updated!\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nAlso have you tried restarting the eslint and typescript servers? Many\npeople seem to be facing that issue.\n1 like\nLike\nNecmettin Sarg\u0131n \u2022 Mar 4 '23\nI don't have any knowledge on backend but don't we use something like\nnode/express for backend? Which one does backend work?\n3 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 4 '23\nYeah express is a backend library. Next.js on the other hand is a full stack\nframework, it provides a backend framework as well as a frontend\nframework with routing. Note that Next.js's backend is based on Node\nexcept their edge API routes which have a subset of node features.\n2 likes\nLike\nGedalyaBlau \u2022 Sep 20 '22\nthank you\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 21 '22\nyou're welcome\n1 like\nLike\nRobert Davidson \u2022 Nov 7 '22\nJust finished this tutorial, it was great and lead me on many rabbit holes to\nbetter understand the tech in this stack. Thanks for making it easy to follow!\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Nov 7 '22\nYou're welcome!\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Valladares \u2022 Oct 7 '22\nAwesome job @nexxeln\n1 like\nLike\nCasey Siebel \u2022 Oct 27 '22 \u2022 Edited on Oct 27\nThanks for doing this tutorial and for your work on CTA! I'm really interested in\nthese technologies!! I know versions change often but it's rather frustrating\nthat the code show in this article is different from the code linked in your\ngithub repo. It make's it difficult / impossible to follow along. Especially if I\ndon't know what package versions you were using in this article write up.\nI'd love to see a tutorial that shows how to use next-auth with credential sign\nup and login, in the T3 stack, using cookies and without using JWTTheo talks\nabout it here but I'm having some trouble getting it all wired up:\nyoutube.com/watch?v=h6wBYWWdyYQ\nThanks again!\n1 like\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Oct 27 '22\nThis post will be updated soon to trpc v10. As of next-auth credential auth,\nI wouldn't recommend using it.\n1 like\nLike\nChristian Angelo M Sulit \u2022 Feb 1 '23\nDocker build failing due to env validation.\nSKIP_ENV_VALIDATION=1 doesn't work.\nLike\nhex-paradus \u2022 Mar 28 '23\nI am unable to login to your deployed version with Discord. And I am getting\nthe same error in a personal project of mine. Do you know why that is\nhappening?\n1 like\nLike\nharshmakwana21 \u2022 Feb 14 '23 \u2022 Edited on Feb 14\nWhy am I getting type error on ctx.prisma.guestbook.create ?\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Hayes \u2022 Mar 21 '23\nNot sure but I have the exact same errors...\n1 like\nLike\nView full discussion (20 comments)\nCode of Conduct \u2022 Report abuse\nAuth0 PROMOTED\nReady, set, deploy!\nWith Auth0 and Vercel, your app goes from zero to hero in record time.\nLearn more\nRead next\nFinding Work as a Self-Taught Web Developer in 2024\nNurudeen Amedu - Jul 28\nHow to create a ribbon for a pricing card with Tailwind CSS\nMichael Andreuzza - Aug 2\nUnderstanding optimistic UI and React\u2019s useOptimistic Hook\nMegan Lee - Aug 20\nReal Time Booking App\nPrince Jain - Jul 28\nThank you to our Diamond Sponsor Neon for supporting our community.\nDEV Community \u2014 A constructive and inclusive social network for software developers. With you every step of your journey.\nHome DEV++ Podcasts Videos Tags DEV Help Forem Shop Advertise on DEV DEV Challenges DEV Showcase About Contact Guides Software comparisons\nCode of Conduct Privacy Policy Terms of use\nBuilt on Forem \u2014 the open source software that powers DEV and other inclusive communities.\nMade with love and Ruby on Rails. DEV Community \u00a9 2016 - 2024.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Build a full stack app with create-t3-app - DEV Community.pdf", "filename": "Build a full stack app with create-t3-app - DEV Community.pdf", "size_mb": 1.54, "modified": "2026-01-24T23:00:31.550063", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:33 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:33 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email. This is an unmonitored account.\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Please save your record\nnumber for tracking. Your record number is: 634919-FZK.\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still\nexperiencing physical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911\nand contact the police.\nWhat to Expect\n1. We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil\nrights violations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your\nreport.\n2. Our specialists determine the next steps\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the\nJustice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report.\nIf so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your\nreport and will recommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid\norganization.\n3. When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not\nalways be able to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you\nprovided in this report. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you\nneed to reach us about your report, please refer to your report number when contacting\nus. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat You Can Do Next\n1. Contact local legal aid organizations or a\nlawyer if you haven\u2019t already.\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help\nyou with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices),to help you find a legal aid\nlawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2. Learn More\nVisit civilrights.justice.gov to learn more about your rights and see examples of\nviolations we handle.\nPlease Note: Each week, we receive hundreds of reports of potential violations. We\ncollect and analyze this information to help us select cases, and we may use this\ninformation as evidence in an existing case. We will review your letter to decide\nwhether it is necessary to contact you for additional information. We do not have the\nresources to follow-up on every letter.\nContact\ncivilrights.justice.gov U.S. Department of (202) 514-3847\nJustice 1-855-856-1247 (toll-free)\nCivil Rights Division Telephone Device for the\n950 Pennsylvania Deaf\nAvenue, NW (TTY) (202) 514-0716\nWashington, D.C.\n20530-0001\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division.pdf", "filename": "Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-11T05:16:30", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "United States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Report successfully submitted\nPlease save your record number for tracking.", "body": "United States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division.\nReport successfully submitted\nPlease save your record number for tracking.\nYour record number is:\n616411-TZV\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights\nviolations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.\n2 Our specialists determine the next step\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the Justice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report. If so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your report and will\nrecommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid organization.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 1 of 4\n3 When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not always be\nable to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you provided in this\nreport. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you need to reach us about\nyour report, please refer to your report number when contacting us. This is how we keep track of\nyour submission.\nWhat you can do next\n1 Contact local legal aid organizations or a lawyer if you haven\u2019t already\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help you with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices), to help you find a legal aid lawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-\nlegal-aid\n2 Get help immediately if you are in danger\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still experiencing\nphysical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911 and contact the police.\nYour submission\nContact\nContact information\nYour name\nRyan Hell\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 2 of 4\nEmail address\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nPhone number\n+12677772344\nAddress\n11015 10th Ave sw\n-\nSeattle, Washington 98144\nAre you now or have ever been an active duty service member?\nNo\nPrimary concern\nWhat is your primary reason for contacting the Civil Rights Division?\nSomething else happened\nLocation\nWhere did this happen?\nOrganization name\n7599 Colockum Road\nAddress\n-\n-\nMalaga, Washington\nPersonal characteristics\nDo you believe any of these personal characteristics influenced why you were treated this\nway?\nDisability (including temporary or recovered and including HIV and drug addiction)\nReligion\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 3 of 4\nOther reason\nDate\nWhen did this happen?\n7/4/2024\nPersonal description\nIn your own words, describe what happened\nOn July 4, 2024, I, Ryan Hell, and my disabled friend (Type 1 diabetic with a brain tumor) were\nstranded in Chelan County, WA, after a flat tire on Colockum Rd. I called 911 for her diabetic\nshock. The dispatcher refused an ambulance, hung up, and rudely insisted a city councilman and\nmechanic take us to a ranch house (7599 Colockum Rd), promising medical help. No ambulance\narrived. At the ranch, we were separated. I was beaten, struck in the head, and extorted for $1,000\ncash by off-duty dispatchers, who threatened to kill me. Video evidence at the courthouse shows\none dispatcher threatening to \u201cbeat my ass\u201d for refusing to pay for \u201csaving\u201d my friend\u2019s life, de-\nspite no medical aid. They tried to provoke a fight, likely for a \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d setup. I re-\nfused to abandon my friend, a disabled diabetic, fearing they\u2019d kill her and frame me. The police\nreport (Incident 24C06401) notes a dispatcher\u2019s sheriff deputy accomplice saying I needed to\n\u201cdisappear for good.\u201d Former Seattle City Councilwoman Sally Bagshaw fled the scene off-road,\nnearly hitting me, as voices yelled, \u201cGo now, police can\u2019t see you!\u201d I posted photos of this on Twit-\nter/Facebook. The tow truck driver, on video, denied any bill or impound, yet I was arrested for\nfelony harassment (RCW 9A.46.020.2bii) based on a fabricated dispute. My lawyers have\nstonewalled or resigned; evidence may vanish. I\u2019m now gang-stalked by violent groups on my usu-\nal paths, fearing for my life as a whistleblower. Washington\u2019s FBI, law firms, and ACLU refuse to\nact. My DOJ complaint (612685-QZC) was rejected for \u201cinsufficient details\u201d despite a 500-charac-\nter form limit. Investigate this conspiracy, civil rights violations, and ongoing stalking. Contact me\nfor evidence.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 4 of 4\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MyPersonalLegalEfforts/CivilRightsIntakeDoJ.pdf", "filename": "CivilRightsIntakeDoJ.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2025-12-02T18:55:04.493218", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a\ncouple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a\ncouple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a conflict\nof interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit murder.\nI\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask you to\ncarefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect everyone\nlikes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of July for\nthem. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was introduced to\nme and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the Stenographer. I\nattempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get her formal name.\nMOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL PROSECUTOR aND established\nSEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of become a political target OF; SALLY\nBAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What is more damnign; for the state; is I even\nhave photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by the alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the\ncops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t mean anything for me today or next month in\nmy jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and the incidents here are only indicators of a much\nbroader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July 4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic\nfriend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service aside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty\ndispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in their pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no\naid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000. I reminded driver it was unauthorized. He\nsurrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my truck. Without going on more the case argues\nthat Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill. Ryan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial\nappointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed and texted Justin Titus and never been able to\ncommunicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at least 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I\nhad to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with some preliminary discovery materials, which was the\npolice report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a proper working email. I have faith in my innocence and\nI was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail and clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good\nconscience for several decades. I have been proactive in obtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and\ndefense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing court clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout,\neach week to connect with council, Titus told him I had concerns about the duration of records being kept which would\nbe exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did not reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a\npersonal appearance in Chelan Superior some time earlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and\navailable and not destroyed. My concern, as I told Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by\ndispatchers based in the initial conversation on 911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or\nrequest any sort of roadside assistance for the flat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have\nfamiliarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and run my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for\ntech products throughout the state, for 7 years while attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of\none which is not going to take any gruff and I respect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something\nfrom a guy who is being charged after tactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what\nappeared to be a very elaborate effort to do me and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to\ncouncil where this matter would be best suited: I will present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and\ndetermine if this is a problem for this court. Again I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen\ninto some sort of destruction cross hairs by judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was\nbeing ousted for his earlier career in youth works and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a\ndisgusting string of predatory events namely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African\nAmerican descent. These allegations had been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and\nworkers. A substantial enough amount of this eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court\nhearing and a sworn judge took careful inventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of\nmolesting those kids and he was in fact every bit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed\nMurray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and he moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle.\nAccusations came out and Murray denied them. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a\nlot of cheering amongst many of us who had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for\njustice. And perseverance, the strong will the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the\nbad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that plaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was\nsomething we had a hard time with a lot of us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter\nsaid they had an anonymous tip who only said Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that\nhe was actually a molestor\u2026 and the case is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4\ndays. They asked me for advice. I simply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol\nrecords. Two days later the Murray lies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this\napply to our case? In the incident, as I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the\nhomeowners saying the police were gonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed\nonsite. I then heard a woman frantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some\nmen said back \u201cyou gotta go now just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing\nshe was yet another piece of evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named\n\u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a career politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career\ninvolves being a senior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed\nMurray and she had aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of\naccusers presented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally\nattempted to keep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad\ncoach, probably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending\nEd Murray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a disgusting\nvulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy creating\npolitical cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express stimulating\nthought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even mafia types.\nSo dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express our intended\nmessage. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between some things\nand it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my name tagged and\nharassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by professional contractors.\nThat FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat unfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my\nwife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work walking to her bus stop at Dash Point\nRoad near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She was robbed by a man who produced a\nhand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They never caught that man and a detective later\nsmirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and looked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are\nmoving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019. I\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep\nstate types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a desert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and\nphotos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we enjoyed the view, that there were people watching\nus. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had my own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both\nsides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting visitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a\nfire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all. Absolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the\nnight of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my license plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done\nsomeone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it. Then Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip\nover to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to try to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to\nexecute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and she is THE well established primary alpha protector of my\nprimarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since 2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of\nher before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a former SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen\nengaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate for me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change\nwho my biological parents were. But I can change the way the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\nHi Ryan,\nWe actually have court today. I am glad your phone is working. Are you able to come to court today?\nThe judge would like you here in person if possible. If not, I can try to get it moved until Wednesday or next Monday\nbut let me know what would work for you.\nThanks,\nOn Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:26 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nI have a working phone again. I will try to call you tomorrow around 9am.\nRyan\n(267)777-2344\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg, 527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-\nD3D164A07FFC.jpeg, IMG_6448.jpeg, IMG_6452.jpeg\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/emails/Re-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "filename": "Re-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-05T11:28:39", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF CHELAN\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON, ) CASE NO: 24-1-00253-04\n` Plaintiff, )\n) DEFENDANT'S PRO SE\n) EMERGENCY MOTION TO\nv. ) EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND DISMISS FOR\n) OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT\nRyan Hell, )\nDefendant.", "body": "SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF CHELAN\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON, ) CASE NO: 24-1-00253-04\n` Plaintiff, )\n) DEFENDANT'S PRO SE\n) EMERGENCY MOTION TO\nv. ) EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND DISMISS FOR\n) OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT\nRyan Hell, )\nDefendant. )\n__________________________________ )\nI. INTRODUCTION\nCOMES NOW the Defendant, Ryan Hell, acting Pro Se, and moves this Honorable\nCourt for an order:\n1) Excluding the State\u2019s video evidence, and\n2) Dismissing the charges with prejudice based on documented **Outrageous\nGovernment Conduct (OGC)** and the systematic **Spoliation of Evidence**, in\nviolation of the Defendant\u2019s due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth\nAmendments to the U.S. Constitution.\nII. STATEMENT OF FACTS SUPPORTING MOTION\nThe State's prosecution is fundamentally compromised by a demonstrable pattern of\nofficial fraud and misconduct, including the fabrication of official records and the\nprovision of forensically tampered video evidence. The State\u2019s continued reliance on\nthis compromised evidence constitutes a violation of the constitutional standard for\nOutrageous Government Conduct.\nIII. GROUND I: FABRICATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (OUTRAGEOUS\nGOVERNMENT CONDUCT) The State has relied upon a false narrative and fabricated\ndocumentation, evidenced by:\nA. Falsification of Towing Records (Official Narrative vs. Documented Fact) Official\nreports and summaries falsely allege that the tow company used or called to the scene\nwas **Mountain View Towing**. The Defendant has established that the actual company\npresent was **B&T Tow Company, e.g., B&T Towing]**, and that the claim regarding\nMountain View Towing is a **deliberate fabrication of fact** within the official records,\nmanufacturing a false basis for prosecution.\nB. Alteration of the CAD Report The police Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) file was\nallegedly altered, changing the nature of the initial emergency call from a medical event\n(**\u201cstroke\u201d**) to a minor property event (**\u201cflat tire\u201d**). This alteration constitutes a willful\nact to manufacture a justification for subsequent police intervention and criminal\ncharges.\nIV. GROUND II: SYSTEMATIC SPOLIATION AND TAMPERING OF VIDEO EVIDENCE\nThe State\u2019s video evidence is forensically unsound and demonstrates a willful,\nsystematic attempt to conceal its manipulation across multiple files.\nA. Concealment of Modification History (Primary Video) The file\u2019s metadata (File:\n**20240704_173916.mp4**) shows the **CreateDate** and **ModifyDate** are\n**identical** (**2024:07:05 00:40:06**), despite the file being disclosed almost 12\nmonths later. This is conclusive evidence that the file\u2019s modification history was\n**deliberately stripped or reset** to conceal processing, which constitutes **Spoliation of\nEvidence.**\nB. Evidence of Concealed Timestamp and Processing (Dash Cam Video) The police\ndash cam video evidence has its time stamp **zeroed out** and indicates it was\nrendered using **FFmpeg** format. Stripping the time stamp conceals the crucial time\nof recording, and FFmpeg is a third-party multimedia framework used for complex\nediting and transcoding, not a native camera output.\nC. Evidence of Advanced Digital Manipulation Tags The primary video file contains the\n**`VideoHandle`** tag, a component associated with 3D rendering and scene\nmanipulation libraries (e.g., videohandles.github.io), and a **non-standard 30.119\nFPS**, all of which demonstrate that the video was subjected to **advanced,\ncontent-altering manipulation.**\nConclusion: The systematic concealment of modification history and the documented\nuse of manipulation tools across multiple files constitutes **Spoliation of Evidence** and\nrenders all video evidence unreliable and inadmissible.\nV. RELIEF REQUESTED\nWHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to order:\n1. **Exclusion** of all video evidence provided by the State.\n2. **Dismissal** of all charges with prejudice based on the documented, systematic\npattern of **Outrageous Government Conduct** (CAD file alteration, tow company lie,\nevidence tampering) which violates the Defendant's constitutional right to due process.\n3. **Scheduling** an evidentiary hearing to receive testimony regarding the documented\nspoliation of evidence.\nDated this 5th day of November, 2025.\n___________________________________\nRyan Hell,, Defendant Pro Se\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MyPersonalLegalEfforts/motionToDismiss_RyanHellChelanCounty.pdf", "filename": "motionToDismiss_RyanHellChelanCounty.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2025-12-02T18:53:19.332864", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:44 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700751\nActive Call Nature ATL/ATC Type l Priority 3\nAddress X:-120.206876, Y:47.238104 City\nCalls Dupl Names w/Alrts Wants Prem Adr\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections\nComplainant\nNumber UTO\nLast UNABLE TO OBTAIN Fst Mid\nAddress DOB / /\nCity ST ZIP SSN - -\nPhone ( ) - Race Sex Prev Calls 99 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert\nContact\nContact RYAN HELL 070978 Telephone (267)777-2344\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received 9 911 Line Occurred between 13:13:28 07/04/24\nReceived By MCCURDY KALAH and 13:20:00 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 13:13:28 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06391 07/04/24 ATL/ATC *Initiating Call\nNM UTO / / UNABLE TO OBTAIN, *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n13:18:33 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP AND GIRLFRIEND WERE REROUTED ON GOOGLE MAPS THROUGH THE CLOCKUM BECAUSE OF A\nDETOUR. THEY ENDED UP GET A FLAT TIRE.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:44 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700751\nActive Call Nature ATL/ATC Type l Priority 3\nAddress X:-120.206876, Y:47.238104 City\nCalls Dupl Names w/Alrts Wants Prem Adr\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections\nComplainant\nNumber UTO\nLast UNABLE TO OBTAIN Fst Mid\nAddress DOB / /\nCity ST ZIP SSN - -\nPhone ( ) - Race Sex Prev Calls 99 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert\nContact\nContact RYAN HELL 070978 Telephone (267)777-2344\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received 9 911 Line Occurred between 13:13:28 07/04/24\nReceived By MCCURDY KALAH and 13:20:00 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 13:13:28 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06391 07/04/24 ATL/ATC *Initiating Call\nNM UTO / / UNABLE TO OBTAIN, *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n13:18:33 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP AND GIRLFRIEND WERE REROUTED ON GOOGLE MAPS THROUGH THE CLOCKUM BECAUSE OF A\nDETOUR. THEY ENDED UP GET A FLAT TIRE. THEY HAVE BEEN STRANDED SINCE 2300HRS\nLAST NIGHT. NO FOOD OR WATER. THEY'RE DEHYDRATED. RP FELT LIKE HE WAS GONNA HAVE\nA STROKE EARLIER BUT HE IS FEELING BETTER. GIRLFRIEND IS A DIABETIC AND DOESNT\nHAVE HER MEDS. RP HAD DRIVEN 20 MILES ON HIS RIM IN HIS BLK FORD F150 AND IS NOW\nSTUCK AND UNABLE TO GET OUT.\n13:19:08 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP WAS TX'D TO KITTITAS CO WHO WAS TOLD TO CALL RCOM\n13:19:22 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP IS UPSET AND SAID HE KEEPS GETTING TRANSFERRED PLACES AND HE'S WORRIED\nTHEY'RE GOING TO DIE\n13:27:06 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nPHONE IS AT 33 PERCENT BUT HE HAS A CHARGER. SAID HES GONNA TRY TO GET ON HIS\nBICYCLE AND RIDE IT INTO TOWN TO GET WATER FOR HIM AND HIS GIRLFRIEND. THEY ARE\nSO DEHYDRATED THEY CAN'T STAY THERE ANYMORE. THE GIRLFRIEND IS GOING TO STAY AT\nLOC WHILE HE RIDES THE BIKE.\n13:27:30 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nPER K16 DOES HE JUST NEED A TOW TRK? MY PHONE IS UNAVAILABLE DOWNLOADING\nANOTHER CASE\n13:28:47 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nYES TOW TRUCK\n13:28:53 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nNO AID NEEDED\n13:29:15 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nFEMALE IS DELIRIOUS AND POSSIBLY GETTING A HEAT STROKE. RP IS SCARED SHE IS\nGOING TO GO INTO DIABETIC SHOCK. BUT DOESN'T NEED AID YET.\n13:41:38 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nMTN HWY TOWING ENRT TO GET THEM. THEY WILL PUT TOGETHER A PLAN AND CALL RCOM\nBACK BUT THEY WILL GO GET THEM. THEY WERE PROVIDED DIRECTIONS. RCOM UPDATED THE\nRP AND THEY REQUESTED WE CALL MTN HWY TOWING AND ASK THEM TO BRING THEM WATER.\nWILL CALL MTN HWY TOWING BACK TO ASK.\n13:41:53 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\n2007 2WD SINGLE CAB FORD F150\n13:43:14 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nMTN HWY TOWING WILL BRING THEM WATER AND CANDY BAR\n13:59:37 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 UPDATED WILL GET HIS AID BAG AND HEAD THERE. WILL UPDATE VIA RADIO ON CCSO\nFREQ OR CALL RCOM W/ AN UPDATE.\n14:13:21 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 IS GOING TO THEIR LOC W/ ONG JUICE, WATER, AID BAG, ETC AND WILL BRING THEM\nTO HIS HOUSE. MTN HWY IS GETTING WHEELS AND TIRES TO RETRIEVE THE PICK UP AND\nBRING IT DOWN TO RC58'S HOUSE.\n14:20:12 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 REQ TO CALL RP BACK TO ADV OF 20 MINUTE ETA IN A BLU GMC PICK UP. CALLED\nTHE RP WHO ADVISED HE ALSO HAS 2 DOGS AND WANTED TO KNOW IF THEY COULD GO TOO.\nTRIED TO CALL RC58 WHO DIDN'T ANSWER.\n14:43:06 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 IS W/ THEM AND WILL LOAD THEM UP AND TAKE THEM BACK TO HIS HOUSE.\n14:44:25 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRC58 HAVE SUBJECTS AND TAKING THEM TO 7599 CLOCKUM\n16:15:17 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 NO MEDICAL ISSUES AND MTN HWY IS WORKING ON GETTING THE TRUCK OUT. RCOM CAN\nCLR THE CALL.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/Dropbox_11-20-25/PRR/24C06391.pdf", "filename": "24C06391.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2025-12-02T10:51:58.014405", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n09/04/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nANNUAL REPORT DUE DATE NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI Number: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed business en\u0000ty\u2019s annual report is due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n09/04/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nANNUAL REPORT DUE DATE NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI Number: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed business en\u0000ty\u2019s annual report is due on 10/31/2024. To remain in ac\u0000ve status, please submit an\nannual report by the due date above. Please verify that the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email\naddress, and update as needed.\nFailure to file the necessary report will result in delinquent status and may result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or\ntermina\u0000on of your registra\u0000on.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nEffec\u0000ve January 1, 2024:\nFile a Beneficial Ownership Informa\u0000on Report with the U.S. Treasury\u2019s Financial Crimes Enforcement\nNetwork (FinCEN). Business en\u0000\u0000es formed or registered prior to January 1, 2024, must file an ini\u0000al\nbeneficial ownership report before January 1, 2025. Updates or correc\u0000ons to a previously filed beneficial\nownership reports must be submi\u0000ed within 30 days of becoming aware of the change.\nFor a current link to file the beneficial ownership informa\u0000on report and addi\u0000onal informa\u0000on, see our\nwebsite at h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons under the Business En\u0000ty tab.\nTo ask about available alterna\u0000ve methods for submi\u0000ng a filing or form for the visually impaired, please call 360-\n725-0377. Teletype (TTY) users may use the Washington Relay Service by calling 711.\nFor a rapid response to ques\u0000ons, requests for assistance, or to provide feedback, please visit the Corpora\u0000ons and\nChari\u0000es website at h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons to chat with a representa\u0000ve.\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/Dropbox_11-20-25/PRR/ChelanPrints/BandTTowSSNoticeofDissolutioin.pdf", "filename": "BandTTowSSNoticeofDissolutioin.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2025-12-02T11:25:18.890266", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "1\n2\n3\n4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\nIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHELAN\n5\n6\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON,\n7 CASE NO.: 24-1-00253-04\nPlaintiff,\n8\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM\nvs. 9 DEFENDANT TO PRESERVE\nRYAN HELL, EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL,\n10\nPHONE, TEXT, RADIO\nDefendant.", "body": "1\n2\n3\n4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\nIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHELAN\n5\n6\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON,\n7 CASE NO.: 24-1-00253-04\nPlaintiff,\n8\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM\nvs.\n9 DEFENDANT TO PRESERVE\nRYAN HELL, EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL,\n10\nPHONE, TEXT, RADIO\nDefendant.\n11\n12\n13 I. MOTION\n14\nA. Motion to Preserve Evidence and Address Potential Spoliation\n15\nThe Defense moves to preserve the following evidence, given concerns about potential\n16\ntampering due to the case\u2019s implications of civil rights violations under color of law and ADA\n17\n18 violations:\n19\n1. All 911 call audio from July 4, 2024, specifically the defendant\u2019s initial call to Rivercom\n20\n911 requesting emergency medical services for their passenger, a type 1 diabetic with chronic\n21\n22 illnesses, including failing kidneys and a brain tumor, legally disabled under federal law and a\n23\nSocial Security recipient.\n24\nThis call establishes the defendant\u2019s sole intent was to secure urgent medical help, explicitly\n25\n26 declining roadside assistance despite dispatch\u2019s insistence. The defense is concerned this audio\n27\nmay no longer exist, as it has not been provided or acknowledged.\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -1\n2. Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) files from Rivercom 911 for the July 4, 2024, incident,\n1\n2 including call classification, timestamps, and dispatcher notes, to verify the call\u2019s existence and\n3\nhandling, especially if the audio has been lost. Washington State law requires CAD files to be\n4\nretained for three years, and with one year elapsed, preservation is urgent.\n5\n6 3. Chelan County Sheriff\u2019s communication records from July 4, 2024, including radio logs,\n7\nphone call logs, text messages, emails, and any other communication records that may document\n8\ninteractions with Rivercom 911 regarding the defendant\u2019s medical emergency call. These records\n9\nare critical to confirm Rivercom\u2019s acknowledgment of the defendant\u2019s request for an ambulance\n10\n11 and any coordination with the Sheriff\u2019s office, which may have declined involvement, as a\n12\nsecondary precaution against the prosecution\u2019s claim that no such call occurred.\n13\n4. Video evidence metadata and access logs, as described above, to ensure integrity and\n14\n15 detect tampering.\n16\n5. Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911\n17\ndispatchers, not private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\n18\n19 The defense has eyewitness testimony that these individuals work for Rivercom and\n20\ntransported the defendant and their passenger to a private residence outside cell service under\n21\nquestionable pretenses.\n22\n23 Failure to preserve this evidence risks spoliation, especially given the high propensity\n24\nfor tampering in a case involving allegations of misconduct by Rivercom personnel who failed to\n25\nsecure an ambulance for a disabled passenger.\n26\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -2\nMotion to Address Denial of Effective Counsel and Civil Rights Violations\n1\n2 The defense moves to address the denial of effective legal counsel, constituting a\n3\nviolation of the defendant\u2019s Sixth Amendment rights.\n4\nThe defendant\u2019s first attorney resigned within three days, citing corruption and\n5\n6 refusing involvement. The second attorney failed to provide evidence, communicate, or act on the\n7\ncase for nearly eight months, effectively denying representation.\n8\nThe current attorney, while filing this motion due to the defendant\u2019s inability to\n9\nafford private counsel and the distance between Seattle and Chelan County, has not denied\n10\n11 allegations of being influenced by opposing parties, raising concerns about compromised\n12\nrepresentation.\n13\nThis pattern of ineffective counsel has obstructed access to exculpatory evidence\n14\n15 critical to the defense.\n16\nAdditionally, the defense raises serious civil rights violations under color of law\n17\nand ADA violations.\n18\n19 The defendant\u2019s passenger, a disabled woman, was denied emergency medical services\n20\ndespite multiple 911 calls, exacerbating her life-threatening condition.\n21\nThe defense alleges the incident involved misconduct by Rivercom dispatchers, who\n22\n23 assaulted the defendant and demanded $1,000, as partially captured in the video.\n24\nThe defense requests an investigation into these violations, including the conduct of\n25\nRivercom dispatchers and the handling of the medical emergency call, to ensure justice and protect\n26\nthe defendant\u2019s constitutional rights.\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -3\nSummary and Urgent Relief Requested\n1\n2 The defense respectfully requests the following immediate actions:\n3\n1. Compel the prosecution to disclose all video evidence from the July 4, 2024, Malaga\n4\nincident, including metadata, forensic data, and access logs.\n5\n6 2. Preserve all 911 call audio, CAD files, Chelan County Sheriff\u2019s communication records\n7\n(radio logs, phone logs, texts, emails), video evidence, and records confirming the alleged victims\u2019\n8\nemployment as Rivercom 911 dispatchers, with associated metadata and access logs, to prevent\n9\ntampering.\n10\n11 3. Investigate the denial of effective counsel, civil rights violations under color of law,\n12\nand ADA violations stemming from the failure to provide emergency medical services to the\n13\ndefendant\u2019s disabled passenger.\n14\n15 4. Issue an order to expedite these motions due to the imminent trial date and the\n16\ndefendant\u2019s residence in Seattle, which limits their ability to file independently without counsel.\n17\nGiven the severity of the allegations, including evidence tampering and misconduct,\n18\n19 the defense urges the Court to act swiftly to ensure a fair trial and uphold justice.\n20\nTo ensure justice and transparency, I respectfully move this Court to issue an order\n21\npreserving the following evidence related to the incident:\n22\n23 1. All 911 call audio recordings from July 4, 2024, related to the incident at 7599 Colockum\n24\nRd, Malaga, WA, to verify the nature of the communications.\n25\n2. All Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) files associated with the incident, including call\n26\nclassifications, timestamps, and dispatcher notes.\n27\n28 3. All RiverCom 911 correspondence, including radio chatter, telephone calls, text\n29\nmessages, emails, and any other communications, particularly those between dispatcher Jeremiah\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -4\nand deputies, including any conducted via personal cell phones, which is irregular for official\n1\n2 business.\n3\n4. All law enforcement body camera and dash camera footage from the incident, including\n4\nunedited versions, along with all forensic metadata, access logs, and chain of custody records to\n5\n6 verify potential tampering and ensure evidence integrity.\n7\n5. All records related to the hit-and-run by the red Toyota Tacoma (license plate C204747),\n8\nincluding any communications referencing the VIP or her departure from the scene.\n9\n6. All records documenting RiverCom 911 call center logs and procedures to identify any\n10\n11 tampering or alterations.\n12\nPreservation of these materials is critical to substantiate my claims of excessive force, false\n13\naccusations, evidence tampering, and potential misconduct, given the unusually long dispatch\n14\n15 response time, which local discussion attributes to deputies waiting roadside for approximately ten\n16\nminutes before approaching the property, likely to allow the VIP to leave.\n17\n18\n19 II. STATEMENT\n20\nOn July 4, 2024, at approximately, at 7599 Colockum Rd, Malaga, WA, I, Ryan Hell, was\n21\nsubjected to an unconstitutional stop and arrest by Chelan County sheriff\u2019s deputies, involving\n22\n23 excessive force, conflicting orders, and false claims that I was holding a firearm.\n24\nDespite no weapon being present in broad daylight with no obstructions, one deputy\n25\nclaimed to see a specific make, model, and caliber of a pistol in my hand, asserting the safety was\n26\noff, while another deputy questioned if a gun was visible, escalating the situation.\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -5\nDeputies threatened to shoot me, stating, \u201cYou\u2019ve got five seconds,\u201d \u201cMy hammer\u2019s\n1\n2 back,\u201d and \u201cOne more word and you\u2019re dead,\u201d while issuing conflicting orders: one instructed me\n3\nto get on my knees and cross my ankles, while another shouted not to move or he would kill me.\n4\nI attempted to de-escalate, identifying myself as cooperative and unarmed, but collapsed\n5\n6 due to severe heat exhaustion and a muscle cramp, which likely prevented an unjustified shooting,\n7\nas I was prone and non-combative.\n8\nI possess photographs of dispatcher Jeremiah using his personal cell phone, allegedly\n9\ncommunicating with deputies, which is irregular for official business and suggests potential\n10\n11 misconduct.\n12\nI overheard deputies discussing a VIP, code-named \u201cMustang\u201d or similar, believed to be\n13\nSally Bagshaw, former Seattle councilwoman, who struck me in a hit-and-run with a red Toyota\n14\n15 Tacoma (Washington license plate C204747, 2022 or 2024 TRD Pro, dark maroon with black\n16\naccent alloy wheels).\n17\nMy photographs show the driver, attempting to cover her face, getting closer to me as I\n18\n19 held up my phone to capture the incident, before she floored the vehicle and fled.\n20\nDash camera footage, viewed at my attorney\u2019s office, appears altered, with suspicious\n21\nlighting, shading, jittering loops, and segments where individuals seem to engage in animated\n22\n23 conversations with no one present, suggesting edited-out characters.\n24\nAs a former visual analyst at Google in Kirkland, Washington, in 2010, with expertise in\n25\ngraphics development, software engineering, user interface design, and video editing since the\n26\n1990s, I can confirm these anomalies indicate tampering.\n27\n28 My attorney intended to hire a forensics expert to examine the footage, but the expert is\n29\nunavailable due to unpaid fees from a prior Chelan County case unrelated to mine.\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -6\nEvidence suggests RiverCom 911 may also be altering call center logs and procedures to\n1\n2 conceal critical communications.\n3\n4\nRespectfully submitted this ____ day of June, 2025.\n5\n6\n7\nRYAN HELL, DEFENDANT\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\n26\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -7\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MyPersonalLegalEfforts/MyMotionToPreserveEvidenceWhichWasDenied.pdf", "filename": "MyMotionToPreserveEvidenceWhichWasDenied.pdf", "size_mb": 0.26, "modified": "2025-12-02T18:38:50.576841", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell, Defendant\nChelan County Superior Court\nCase # 24-1-00253-04\nEXHIBIT A: METADATA PROOF (File: 20240704_173916.mp4)\nThis evidence directly supports the claims of Spoliation of Evidence and Advanced Digital\nTampering cited in the attached Motion.", "body": "Ryan Hell, Defendant\nChelan County Superior Court\nCase # 24-1-00253-04\nEXHIBIT A: METADATA PROOF (File: 20240704_173916.mp4)\nThis evidence directly supports the claims of Spoliation of Evidence and Advanced Digital\nTampering cited in the attached Motion.\n1. Concealment of Modification History (Identical Dates):\n\u25cf Createdate: 2024:07:05 00:40:06\n\u25cf Modifydate: 2024:07:05 00:40:06\n2. Evidence of Advanced Tampering/Rendering Tools:\n\u25cf Videoframerate: 30.119 (Non-standard rate indicating re-encoding)\n\u25cf Handler Name (Video Stream): VideoHandle (Component associated with 3D\nmanipulation software)\n\u25cf Handler Name (Audio Track): SoundHandle (Component associated with audio\nprocessing software)\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/Dropbox_11-20-25/PRR/ChelanPrints/Exhinbit_A.pdf", "filename": "Exhinbit_A.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2025-12-02T11:29:07.735790", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nChecksum 5491a833bacfdeaed408f4861984e0f6\nFilename 20240704_173916.mp4\nFilesize 107 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 v2 [ISO 14496-14]\nMinorversion 0.0.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 mp42\nMediadatasize 107010106\nMediadataoffset 40\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nModifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTimescale 10000\nDuration 0:00:50\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nPreviewduration 0 s\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 1/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nPlaymode SEQ_PLAY\nAuthor Samsung SM-A426U\nAndroidversion 13\nAndroidcapturefps 30\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackmodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 0:00:50\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 1920\nImageheight 1080\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 1920\nSourceimageheight 1080\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nColorprofiles nclx\nColorprimaries BT.709\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 2/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTransfercharacteristics BT.709\nMatrixcoefficients BT.709\nVideoframerate 30.119\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediamodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediatimescale 48000\nMediaduration 0:00:50\nHandlertype Audio Track\nHandlerdescription SoundHandle\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 48000\nImagesize 1920x1080\nMegapixels 2.1\nAvgbitrate 17.3 Mbps\nRotation 90\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 3/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 1920\nHeight 1080\nCoded Width 1920\nCoded Height 1080\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 40\nColor Range tv\nColor Space bt709\nColor Transfer bt709\nColor Primaries bt709\nChroma Location left\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 30/1\nAvg Frame Rate 7465000/247849\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 4461282\nDuration 49.5698\nBit Rate 17014702\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 4/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 1493\nExtradata Size 35\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name VideoHandle\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 5/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nSide Data List\n0\nSide Data Type Display Matrix\nDisplaymatrix 00000000: 0\n65536 0\n00000001: -65536\n0 0\n00000002: 0\n0 1073741824\nRotation -90\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 48000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 6/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTime Base 1/48000\nStart Pts 3048\nStart Time 0.0635\nDuration Ts 2374619\nDuration 49.471229\nBit Rate 256015\nNb Frames 2319\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 7/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name SoundHandle\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 49.5698\nSize 107034115\nBit Rate 17274084\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand mp42\nMinor Version 0\nCompatible Brands isommp42\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.000000Z\nCom.android.version 13\nCom.android.capture.fps 30\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 8/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nRaw Header 00 00 00 18 66 74 79 70 6D 70 34 32 00 00\n00 00 69 73 6F 6D 6D 70 34 32 00 00 00 01\n6D 64 61 74 00 00 00 00 06 60 D8 4A 21 11\n45 00 14 50 01 46 FF F1 0A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 9/9\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/Dropbox_11-20-25/PRR/ChelanPrints/20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.27, "modified": "2025-12-02T11:29:57.808333", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nTotal Number of Redactions in Document: 1\nRedaction Reasons by Page\nPage Reason Description Occurrences\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security\nnumbers credit card numbers or bank or\nother financial account numbers except\nwhen disclosure is expressly required by\nor governed by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\nPersonal chapter. \u201cOther financial account\n1 1\nInformation numbers\u201d applies to information such as\nsocial security numbers (as defined in\nRCW 9.35.005). Specific investigative\nrecords compiled by law enforcement\nagencies the nondisclosure is essential for\nthe protection of any person\u2019s right to\nprivacy. Disclosure of social security\nnumbers would be highly offensive to a\nreasonable person and is not of legitimate\nconcern to the public.\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nRedaction Reasons by Exemption\nPages\nReason Description\n(Count)\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security numbers\ncredit card numbers or bank or other\nfinancial account numbers except when\ndisclosure is expressly required by or\ngoverned by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\n1(1)\nPersonal Information chapter. \u201cOther financial account numbers\u201d\napplies to information such as social\nsecurity numbers (as defined in RCW\n9.35.005). Specific investigative records\ncompiled by law enforcement agencies the\nnondisclosure is essential for the protection\nof any person\u2019s right to privacy. Disclosure\nof social security numbers would be highly\noffensive to a reasonable person and is not\nof legitimate concern to the public.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/Dropbox_11-20-25/PRR/ChelanPrints/cad.pdf", "filename": "cad.pdf", "size_mb": 0.21, "modified": "2025-12-02T11:29:42.866171", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n09/04/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nANNUAL REPORT DUE DATE NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI Number: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed business en\u0000ty\u2019s annual report is due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n09/04/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nANNUAL REPORT DUE DATE NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI Number: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed business en\u0000ty\u2019s annual report is due on 10/31/2024. To remain in ac\u0000ve status, please submit an\nannual report by the due date above. Please verify that the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email\naddress, and update as needed.\nFailure to file the necessary report will result in delinquent status and may result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or\ntermina\u0000on of your registra\u0000on.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nEffec\u0000ve January 1, 2024:\nFile a Beneficial Ownership Informa\u0000on Report with the U.S. Treasury\u2019s Financial Crimes Enforcement\nNetwork (FinCEN). Business en\u0000\u0000es formed or registered prior to January 1, 2024, must file an ini\u0000al\nbeneficial ownership report before January 1, 2025. Updates or correc\u0000ons to a previously filed beneficial\nownership reports must be submi\u0000ed within 30 days of becoming aware of the change.\nFor a current link to file the beneficial ownership informa\u0000on report and addi\u0000onal informa\u0000on, see our\nwebsite at h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons under the Business En\u0000ty tab.\nTo ask about available alterna\u0000ve methods for submi\u0000ng a filing or form for the visually impaired, please call 360-\n725-0377. Teletype (TTY) users may use the Washington Relay Service by calling 711.\nFor a rapid response to ques\u0000ons, requests for assistance, or to provide feedback, please visit the Corpora\u0000ons and\nChari\u0000es website at h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons to chat with a representa\u0000ve.\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/Dropbox_11-20-25/PRR/ChelanPrints/96FEA413-BFCC-4ED4-B644-89FA5749A714.PDF", "filename": "96FEA413-BFCC-4ED4-B644-89FA5749A714.PDF", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2025-12-02T11:25:57.444698", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF CHELAN\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON, ) CASE NO: 24-1-00253-04\n` Plaintiff, )\n) DEFENDANT'S PRO SE\n) EMERGENCY MOTION TO\nv. ) EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND DISMISS FOR\n) OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT\nRyan Hell, )\nDefendant.", "body": "SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF CHELAN\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON, ) CASE NO: 24-1-00253-04\n` Plaintiff, )\n) DEFENDANT'S PRO SE\n) EMERGENCY MOTION TO\nv. ) EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND DISMISS FOR\n) OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT\nRyan Hell, )\nDefendant. )\n__________________________________ )\nI. INTRODUCTION\nCOMES NOW the Defendant, Ryan Hell, acting Pro Se, and moves this Honorable\nCourt for an order:\n1) Excluding the State\u2019s video evidence, and\n2) Dismissing the charges with prejudice based on documented **Outrageous\nGovernment Conduct (OGC)** and the systematic **Spoliation of Evidence**, in\nviolation of the Defendant\u2019s due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth\nAmendments to the U.S. Constitution.\nII. STATEMENT OF FACTS SUPPORTING MOTION\nThe State's prosecution is fundamentally compromised by a demonstrable pattern of\nofficial fraud and misconduct, including the fabrication of official records and the\nprovision of forensically tampered video evidence. The State\u2019s continued reliance on\nthis compromised evidence constitutes a violation of the constitutional standard for\nOutrageous Government Conduct.\nIII. GROUND I: FABRICATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (OUTRAGEOUS\nGOVERNMENT CONDUCT) The State has relied upon a false narrative and fabricated\ndocumentation, evidenced by:\nA. Falsification of Towing Records (Official Narrative vs. Documented Fact) Official\nreports and summaries falsely allege that the tow company used or called to the scene\nwas **Mountain View Towing**. The Defendant has established that the actual company\npresent was **B&T Tow Company, e.g., B&T Towing]**, and that the claim regarding\nMountain View Towing is a **deliberate fabrication of fact** within the official records,\nmanufacturing a false basis for prosecution.\nB. Alteration of the CAD Report The police Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) file was\nallegedly altered, changing the nature of the initial emergency call from a medical event\n(**\u201cstroke\u201d**) to a minor property event (**\u201cflat tire\u201d**). This alteration constitutes a willful\nact to manufacture a justification for subsequent police intervention and criminal\ncharges.\nIV. GROUND II: SYSTEMATIC SPOLIATION AND TAMPERING OF VIDEO EVIDENCE\nThe State\u2019s video evidence is forensically unsound and demonstrates a willful,\nsystematic attempt to conceal its manipulation across multiple files.\nA. Concealment of Modification History (Primary Video) The file\u2019s metadata (File:\n**20240704_173916.mp4**) shows the **CreateDate** and **ModifyDate** are\n**identical** (**2024:07:05 00:40:06**), despite the file being disclosed almost 12\nmonths later. This is conclusive evidence that the file\u2019s modification history was\n**deliberately stripped or reset** to conceal processing, which constitutes **Spoliation of\nEvidence.**\nB. Evidence of Concealed Timestamp and Processing (Dash Cam Video) The police\ndash cam video evidence has its time stamp **zeroed out** and indicates it was\nrendered using **FFmpeg** format. Stripping the time stamp conceals the crucial time\nof recording, and FFmpeg is a third-party multimedia framework used for complex\nediting and transcoding, not a native camera output.\nC. Evidence of Advanced Digital Manipulation Tags The primary video file contains the\n**`VideoHandle`** tag, a component associated with 3D rendering and scene\nmanipulation libraries (e.g., videohandles.github.io), and a **non-standard 30.119\nFPS**, all of which demonstrate that the video was subjected to **advanced,\ncontent-altering manipulation.**\nConclusion: The systematic concealment of modification history and the documented\nuse of manipulation tools across multiple files constitutes **Spoliation of Evidence** and\nrenders all video evidence unreliable and inadmissible.\nV. RELIEF REQUESTED\nWHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to order:\n1. **Exclusion** of all video evidence provided by the State.\n2. **Dismissal** of all charges with prejudice based on the documented, systematic\npattern of **Outrageous Government Conduct** (CAD file alteration, tow company lie,\nevidence tampering) which violates the Defendant's constitutional right to due process.\n3. **Scheduling** an evidentiary hearing to receive testimony regarding the documented\nspoliation of evidence.\nDated this 5th day of November, 2025.\n___________________________________\nRyan Hell,, Defendant Pro Se\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/Dropbox_11-20-25/PRR/ChelanPrints/motionToDismiss_RyanHellChelanCounty.pdf", "filename": "motionToDismiss_RyanHellChelanCounty.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2025-12-02T11:29:50.667256", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the above listed\nen\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve status.\nFailure to file the necessary report by 02/28/2025 will result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or termina\u0000on of your\nregistra\u0000on.\nPlease verify the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email address and update as needed.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corps\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MisidentifiedTowCompany/delinquencyNoticeSecStateWa.pdf", "filename": "delinquencyNoticeSecStateWa.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2025-12-02T23:49:27.934302", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nTotal Number of Redactions in Document: 1\nRedaction Reasons by Page\nPage Reason Description Occurrences\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security\nnumbers credit card numbers or bank or\nother financial account numbers except\nwhen disclosure is expressly required by\nor governed by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\nPersonal chapter. \u201cOther financial account\n1 1\nInformation numbers\u201d applies to information such as\nsocial security numbers (as defined in\nRCW 9.35.005). Specific investigative\nrecords compiled by law enforcement\nagencies the nondisclosure is essential for\nthe protection of any person\u2019s right to\nprivacy. Disclosure of social security\nnumbers would be highly offensive to a\nreasonable person and is not of legitimate\nconcern to the public.\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nRedaction Reasons by Exemption\nPages\nReason Description\n(Count)\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security numbers\ncredit card numbers or bank or other\nfinancial account numbers except when\ndisclosure is expressly required by or\ngoverned by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\n1(1)\nPersonal Information chapter. \u201cOther financial account numbers\u201d\napplies to information such as social\nsecurity numbers (as defined in RCW\n9.35.005). Specific investigative records\ncompiled by law enforcement agencies the\nnondisclosure is essential for the protection\nof any person\u2019s right to privacy. Disclosure\nof social security numbers would be highly\noffensive to a reasonable person and is not\nof legitimate concern to the public.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/Dropbox_11-20-25/PRR/24C06401_R.pdf", "filename": "24C06401_R.pdf", "size_mb": 0.21, "modified": "2025-12-02T10:52:01.296440", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the en\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve\nstatus.\nIn accordance with RCW23.95.605-610, the above en\u0000ty is hereby administra\u0000vely dissolved as of: 03/03/2025.\nThis ac\u0000on was taken due to failure of the en\u0000ty to file a required report within the \u0000me set forth by law.\nUnder RCW 23.95.615, a domes\u0000c en\u0000ty that is administra\u0000vely dissolved may apply for reinstatement no later than five (5)\nyears a\u0000er the effec\u0000ve date of administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on noted above. RCW 23.95.615 iden\u0000fies the requirements for an\napplica\u0000on for reinstatement.\nYou can access the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) online to reac\u0000vate your\nen\u0000ty using the following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. This no\u0000ce is generated as part of\nan automated no\u0000fica\u0000on process.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MisidentifiedTowCompany/C3910175-449A-4D24-974B-CF59449049CA.pdf", "filename": "C3910175-449A-4D24-974B-CF59449049CA.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2025-12-02T17:32:36.438920", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the en\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve\nstatus.\nIn accordance with RCW23.95.605-610, the above en\u0000ty is hereby administra\u0000vely dissolved as of: 03/03/2025.\nThis ac\u0000on was taken due to failure of the en\u0000ty to file a required report within the \u0000me set forth by law.\nUnder RCW 23.95.615, a domes\u0000c en\u0000ty that is administra\u0000vely dissolved may apply for reinstatement no later than five (5)\nyears a\u0000er the effec\u0000ve date of administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on noted above. RCW 23.95.615 iden\u0000fies the requirements for an\napplica\u0000on for reinstatement.\nYou can access the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) online to reac\u0000vate your\nen\u0000ty using the following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. This no\u0000ce is generated as part of\nan automated no\u0000fica\u0000on process.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MisidentifiedTowCompany/noticeofdisolutionSexretaryofStateWa.pdf", "filename": "noticeofdisolutionSexretaryofStateWa.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2025-12-02T23:49:27.780301", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the above listed\nen\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve status.\nFailure to file the necessary report by 02/28/2025 will result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or termina\u0000on of your\nregistra\u0000on.\nPlease verify the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email address and update as needed.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corps\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MisidentifiedTowCompany/FD7D01CF-0A36-47F6-8FA3-E505BCAE556A.pdf", "filename": "FD7D01CF-0A36-47F6-8FA3-E505BCAE556A.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2025-12-02T17:32:36.430920", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Search Search \u2192\nBills, meetings, and session \uf078 State laws and rules \uf078 Learn and participate \uf078 Legislators \uf078 About the Legislature \uf078\nHome / State laws and rules / WACs / Title 204 / Chapter 204-91A / Section 204-91A-180 Print\n204-91A-170 << 204-91A-180 >> End of Chapter\nWAC 204-91A-180\nPDF Agency filings affecting this section\nAdditional Towing and Tow Operator Qualifications,\nRestrictions, and Requirements. In addition to the requirements contained in WAC 204-91A-170, registered tow truck operators appointed pursuant to this chapter must conform to all laws\nand administrative rules pertaining to the tow industry and must observe the following practices and procedures:\n(1) When called by the patrol during normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck, from within the assigned zone within five minutes after\nreceiving the call.", "body": "Search Search \u2192\nBills, meetings, and session \uf078 State laws and rules \uf078 Learn and participate \uf078 Legislators \uf078 About the Legislature \uf078\nHome / State laws and rules / WACs / Title 204 / Chapter 204-91A / Section 204-91A-180 Print\n204-91A-170 << 204-91A-180 >> End of Chapter\nWAC 204-91A-180\nPDF Agency filings affecting this section\nAdditional Towing and Tow Operator Qualifications,\nRestrictions, and Requirements.\nIn addition to the requirements contained in WAC 204-91A-170, registered tow truck operators appointed pursuant to this chapter must conform to all laws\nand administrative rules pertaining to the tow industry and must observe the following practices and procedures:\n(1) When called by the patrol during normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck, from within the assigned zone within five minutes after\nreceiving the call. Tow trucks must be registered to and belong to the particular tow business that is called and assigned only to that tow zone. If an officer at the scene\ndeems it necessary, the officer may authorize additional assistance from a registered tow operator outside of the tow zone.\n(2) When called by the patrol after normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck from within the assigned zone within fifteen minutes after\nreceiving the call.\n(3) The tow truck that is dispatched must arrive at the stated location within a reasonable time considering distance, traffic, and weather conditions.\n(4) If for any reason a tow operator is unable to dispatch a tow truck within the stated time or if the dispatched truck will be delayed for any reason, the tow\noperator must advise the patrol stating the reason and estimated time of arrival. In the event the tow truck fails to arrive at the scene within a reasonable time, the\npatrol will contact another tow operator to respond to the scene and will cancel the original tow.\n(5) A tow operator on rotation who is unable to dispatch or arrive within the times stated in subsections (1), (2), (3), and (4) of this section will forfeit the tow\noperator's turn and be placed at the bottom of the rotation list as if the tow operator had responded.\n(6) Repeated refusal or failure of the appointee to respond to calls from the patrol for towing services or to provide the requested services may result in the\nsuspension or revocation of the tow operator's letter of appointment.\n(7) If the tow operator will be unavailable for twenty-four hours or more to respond to rotational calls with a class \"A,\" \"B,\" or \"C\" tow truck, the tow operator\nmust advise the appropriate patrol office. Unavailability may occur due to conditions including, but not limited to, other tow truck commitments, tow truck disabled\nand/or under repair, unforeseen driver shortage due to illness. The tow operator must give the reason for unavailability and the approximate date and time when the\ncompany will be available to respond to calls.\nThe tow company will be removed from the rotational list and will not be called until the tow operator advises the patrol that the company is once again able to\nrespond to calls with an \"A,\" \"B,\" or \"C\" class truck. In all such cases, the tow company will resume its normal position on the rotational list without regard to any missed\ncalls or its position prior to being unavailable.\n(8) The tow operator must advise the patrol whenever a private call is received for a tow with circumstances that indicate that the tow is for a vehicle that has\nbeen involved in a collision, incident, or equipment breakdown on the public roadway. The tow operator also must advise the patrol of all private calls to motor vehicle\ncollisions on private property resulting in bodily injury or death.\n(9) The tow operator must notify the patrol before moving any vehicle involved in a collision on a public highway under the jurisdiction of the patrol as defined in\nthe motor vehicle code, Title 46 RCW, or where it appears that the driver of the vehicle to be moved is under the influence of intoxicants or drugs, or is otherwise\nincapacitated.\n(10) Other than a service patrol established and funded by the department of transportation, a tow operator must not solicit tow or roadside services by\npatrolling the public roadways searching for disabled vehicles or vehicles involved in a traffic collision.\n(11) When the patrol is in charge of a collision scene or other such incident, a tow operator must not respond to such scene unless his services have been\nspecifically requested by the patrol, the vehicle's owner or operator, or the owner's authorized representative.\n(12) The tow operator must be available, or will ensure that specific employees are available, twenty-four hours a day for the purpose of receiving calls or\narranging for the release of vehicles. Business hours will be posted conspicuously at the tow operator's place of business so they can be seen during business hours and\nnonbusiness hours. A copy must also be sent to the inspector of the district in which the tow operator does business. Changes of business hours must be sent to the\ndepartment and the inspector ten days before their effective date.\n(13) The tow operator must post a current copy of tow and storage rates, on a form approved by the department and the patrol, in the following locations:\n(a) At the entrance to the place of business, in a conspicuous location, plainly visible and capable of being read by the public, whether the business is open or\nclosed. If, in order to meet this requirement, the rate sheets must be placed in a location, exposed to the elements, they must be protected so as to remain legible.\n(b) Inside the business location, where business is commonly transacted. The rate sheets must be posted in such manner as to be clearly and plainly visible and\nread at all times by customers of the business.\n(c) A copy of the current rates will be sent to the department, the section, and the patrol district commander of the district in which the tow operator has applied\nfor a letter of appointment. Notice of any change(s) in service rates will be forwarded to the department, the section, and the district commander of the area ten days\nbefore the effective date of the changes. Charges made for towing services arising from calls initiated by the patrol must be consistent with current posted towing\nrates and must be based only upon services listed on the prescribed form.\n(d) In the event that a tow operator has only a class \"B\" truck and utilizes it for class \"A\" and \"B\" type tows, the tow operator must file a rate sheet that specifies\nthe rates charged for the different types of tows.\n(e) Whenever any tow operator utilizes a larger truck than the towed vehicle warrants, the tow operator must charge fees based on the size of the towed vehicle\nnot the size of the truck used.\n(14) Charges made for towing services arising from calls initiated by the patrol must not exceed the maximum rates established by the chief.\n(15) Unless other arrangements are made with commissioned patrol personnel at the scene, all impounded vehicles must be taken to the tow operators nearest\napproved storage location within the tow operator's assigned tow zone.\n(16) The tow operator will maintain, for three years, records on towed and released vehicles which were towed at the request of the patrol. Such records will be\navailable for inspection by the patrol during normal business hours at the tow operator's place of business. Records will include, but not be limited to:\n(a) An itemized receipt of all charges for the services provided.\n(b) A tow impound record inventory or copy thereof made out by the trooper at the scene of the tow and signed by the tow operator.\n(c) All other records required by the department.\n(17) The first and last name of the tow truck driver will be placed on the tow impound inventory record made out by the patrol officer at the scene and the officer\nmay verify their driver's license; except that the signature may be provided on existing forms with form number 3000-110-076 (R 7/11) until current stock is depleted.\n(18) Tow operators must obtain and maintain a current registration certificate as required by RCW 46.55.020.\n(19) Tow operators must perform towing tasks competently. The standard of competence will be that quality of work which is accepted as efficient and effective\nwithin the towing industry. The tow operator must ensure tow truck drivers responding to calls initiated by the patrol have completed a minimum of one four-hour tow\ntruck driver training course every five years. The tow operator must keep a file documenting training.\n(20) No tow operator, employee, or agent will misappropriate, wrongfully convert to his/her own use, or abuse property belonging to another and entrusted to\nhis/her care or storage.\n(21) Tow operators must use emergency lights to warn other motorists only when at the scene of collisions, disabled vehicles, and/or recoveries. Such lighting\nmust not be used when traveling to or from the scene.\n(22) Tow operators are required to clean collision/incident scenes of all vehicle glass, debris, and vehicle liquid spills of one gallon or less.\n(23) Specific operating restrictions and/or requirements, by truck class, are as follows:\n(a) The standard air brake release tools (caging stud assemblies) required to be carried in the class \"B,\" \"B-2,\" and \"C\" trucks must be used, whenever necessary,\nto preserve potential evidence involving brake equipment or adjustment settings. When a tow operator is attempting to move a vehicle equipped with locked spring\nparking brakes that cannot be released by external air supply, the caging assemblies must be used to release the brake tension. Under no circumstances will the towed\nvehicle's brake assemblies or adjustments be moved or disturbed in any way that will prevent later determination of the precollision or incident settings.\n(b) Class \"B\" or \"B-2\" trucks in excess of twenty-three thousand pounds gross vehicle weight rating need not carry dollies when towing or recovering heavy\nvehicles.\n(24) Whenever a \"special event or overflow\" storage lot is approved by the department, the patrol and appropriate city/county jurisdictions, the following must\napply:\n(a) The tow operator must maintain personnel at the lot twenty-four hours per day for security and vehicle and/or personal property release. If necessary,\nreimbursement for such labor must be part of the contract for the \"special event\" if appropriate or by amended storage rates with a waiver of the ten-day rate change\nnotice requirement approved by the department and the patrol.\n(b) At the conclusion of a \"special event or overflow\" situation, all vehicles not reclaimed by the vehicle's owner or the owner's authorized representative must\nbe towed to the tow operator's regular storage facility and processed in the normal fashion. No additional fee must be charged for towing the vehicle from the\noverflow lot to the regular storage facility.\n(25) All work performed by the tow operator and/or employee must be in the most professional and expeditious manner. Tow operators and employees must\nrefrain from any unprofessional actions while towing for or conducting towing business at the request of the patrol. The actions include, but are not limited to, any of\nthe following:\n(a) Lack of service, selective service, or refusal to provide service which the tow operator should be capable of performing;\n(b) Exhibiting any signs of either alcohol, drug use, or both;\n(c) Displaying any objects, logos, slogans, or graphic material within the view of the public that contains any form of pornography, profanity, or prejudice toward\nany person or group of persons; and\n(d) Directing toward a vehicle's owner, operator or the owner's authorized representative any profanity or slurs based on the person's culture, race, gender or\nsexual preference.\n(26) Tow operators must, when required by the patrol or the department, cause to be displayed on each approved truck, decals indicating truck class, patrol\ndistrict, and/or assigned tow zone.\n(27) When responding to a patrol call, tow truck driver must wear clothing identifying the company and the driver's first name. The driver's first name is the first\nname used on the person's driver's license or a nickname that the person commonly uses and by which the person is commonly known.\n(28) Tow truck drivers performing recovery, impounding, or towing must wear work vests of highly visible materials, or equivalent distinguishing apparel when\noutside of the towing vehicle as outlined in WAC 296-155-200(5) and Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23 Part 634.3.\n(29) Tow operators must not display any sign, shield, marking, accessory, or insignia on uniforms or vehicles indicating the equipment or vehicle marking are\nsimilar to or belong to any public law enforcement agency. Tow operators must not engage in any advertisement indicating an official connection with the patrol or\nother law enforcement agency.\n[Statutory Authority: RCW 46.55.115. WSR 17-10-029, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 4/26/17, effective 5/27/17. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005, 46.55.050, and\n46.55.115. WSR 13-18-065, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 9/3/13, effective 10/4/13. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.55.050, 46.55.115, and 46.55.075. WSR 13-11-112, \u00a7 204-\n91A-180, filed 5/21/13, effective 6/21/13. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005, 46.55.050, and 46.55.115. WSR 09-09-118, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 4/21/09, effective\n5/22/09. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005 and 46.55.115. WSR 07-02-025A, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 12/22/06, effective 1/22/07. Statutory Authority: RCW\n46.37.005, 46.55.050, and 46.55.115. WSR 02-07-056, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 3/15/02, effective 4/15/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005 and 46.55.050. WSR\n94-18-083, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 9/2/94, effective 10/3/94. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.61.567. WSR 89-21-044, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 10/13/89, effective\n11/13/89. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.35.005 [46.37.005]. WSR 89-14-015 (Order 89-04-ESR), \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 6/23/89.]\nStudies, audits, and reports Accessibility\nPerformance audits Jobs\nLegislative questions or comments\nActuarial reporting Public records requests\nCall the Legislative Hotline\n1-800-562-6000 Transportation studies and Site help\nreports\nTTY for deaf/hard of hearing: 1-800-833-6388\nContact us\nReports from outside\nLearn more about the Legislative Hotline\norganizations Email updates (GovDelivery)\nInvestigation reports\nDisclaimer Privacy Notice \u00a9 Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MisidentifiedTowCompany/WAC_204_91A_180.pdf", "filename": "WAC_204_91A_180.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2025-12-02T17:32:36.440920", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nbeing operated beyond a 75 air-mile ra- (iii) One or more motor vehicles in-\ndius (86.3 statute miles or 138.9 kilo- curring disabling damage as a result of\nmeters) from the driver\u2019s normal work- the accident, requiring the motor vehi-\nreporting location, and provided the cle(s) to be transported away from the\nvehicle does not otherwise meet the scene by a tow truck or other motor\ndefinition of a commercial motor vehi- vehicle. cle, except that motor carriers oper- (2) The term accident does not in-\nating such vehicles are required to clude:\ncomply with \u00a7\u00a7390.15, 390.19, and (i) An occurrence involving only\n390.21(a) and (b)(2).", "body": "Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nbeing operated beyond a 75 air-mile ra- (iii) One or more motor vehicles in-\ndius (86.3 statute miles or 138.9 kilo- curring disabling damage as a result of\nmeters) from the driver\u2019s normal work- the accident, requiring the motor vehi-\nreporting location, and provided the cle(s) to be transported away from the\nvehicle does not otherwise meet the scene by a tow truck or other motor\ndefinition of a commercial motor vehi- vehicle.\ncle, except that motor carriers oper- (2) The term accident does not in-\nating such vehicles are required to clude:\ncomply with \u00a7\u00a7390.15, 390.19, and (i) An occurrence involving only\n390.21(a) and (b)(2). boarding and alighting from a sta-\n(g) Motor carriers that transport haz- tionary motor vehicle; or\nardous materials in intrastate commerce. (ii) An occurrence involving only the\nThe rules in the following provisions of loading or unloading of cargo.\nsubchapter B of this chapter apply to\nAlcohol concentration (AC) means the\nmotor carriers that transport haz-\nconcentration of alcohol in a person\u2019s\nardous materials in intrastate com-\nblood or breath. When expressed as a\nmerce and to the motor vehicles that\npercentage it means grams of alcohol\ntransport hazardous materials in intra-\nper 100 milliliters of blood or grams of\nstate commerce:\nalcohol per 210 liters of breath.\n(1) Part 385, subparts A and E, for\nBus means any motor vehicle de-\ncarriers subject to the requirements of\nsigned, constructed, and or used for the\n\u00a7385.403 of this chapter.\ntransportation of passengers, including\n(2) Part 386, Rules of practice for\ntaxicabs.\nmotor carrier, broker, freight for-\nBusiness district means the territory\nwarder, and hazardous materials pro-\ncontiguous to and including a highway\nceedings, of this chapter.\nwhen within any 600 feet along such\n(3) Part 387, Minimum Levels of Fi-\nhighway there are buildings in use for\nnancial Responsibility for Motor Car-\nbusiness or industrial purposes, includ-\nriers, to the extent provided in \u00a7387.3 of\ning but not limited to hotels, banks, or\nthis chapter.\noffice buildings which occupy at least\n(4) Section 390.19, Motor carrier iden-\n300 feet of frontage on one side or 300\ntification report, and \u00a7390.21, Marking\nfeet collectively on both sides of the\nof CMVs, for carriers subject to the re-\nhighway.\nquirements of \u00a7385.403 of this chapter.\nCharter transportation of passengers\nIntrastate motor carriers operating\nmeans transportation, using a bus, of a\nprior to January 1, 2005, are excepted\ngroup of persons who pursuant to a\nfrom \u00a7390.19(a)(1).\ncommon purpose, under a single con-\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988, as amended at 54 tract, at a fixed charge for the motor\nFR 12202, Mar. 24, 1989; 58 FR 33776, June 21, vehicle, have acquired the exclusive\n1993; 59 FR 8752, Feb. 23, 1994; 59 FR 67554, use of the motor vehicle to travel to-\nDec. 29, 1994; 62 FR 1296, Jan. 9, 1997; 63 FR\ngether under an itinerary either speci-\n33276, June 18, 1998; 64 FR 48516, Sept. 3, 1999;\nfied in advance or modified after hav-\n66 FR 2766, Jan. 11, 2001; 68 FR 47875, Aug. 12,\n2003; 69 FR 39372, June 30, 2004] ing left the place of origin.\nCommercial motor vehicle means any\n\u00a7390.5 Definitions. self-propelled or towed motor vehicle\nUnless specifically defined elsewhere, used on a highway in interstate com-\nin this subchapter: merce to transport passengers or prop-\nAccident means\u2014 erty when the vehicle\u2014\n(1) Except as provided in paragraph (1) Has a gross vehicle weight rating\n(2) of this definition, an occurrence in- or gross combination weight rating, or\nvolving a commercial motor vehicle gross vehicle weight or gross combina-\noperating on a highway in interstate or tion weight, of 4,536 kg (10,001 pounds)\nintrastate commerce which results in: or more, whichever is greater; or\n(i) A fatality; (2) Is designed or used to transport\n(ii) Bodily injury to a person who, as more than 8 passengers (including the\na result of the injury, immediately re- driver) for compensation; or\nceives medical treatment away from (3) Is designed or used to transport\nthe scene of the accident; or more than 15 passengers, including the\n309\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00321 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.5 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\ndriver, and is not used to transport pas- (i) Damage which can be remedied\nsengers for compensation; or temporarily at the scene of the acci-\n(4) Is used in transporting material dent without special tools or parts.\nfound by the Secretary of Transpor- (ii) Tire disablement without other\ntation to be hazardous under 49 U.S.C. damage even if no spare tire is avail-\n5103 and transported in a quantity re- able.\nquiring placarding under regulations (iii) Headlamp or taillight damage.\nprescribed by the Secretary under 49 (iv) Damage to turn signals, horn, or\nCFR, subtitle B, chapter I, subchapter windshield wipers which makes them\ninoperative.\nC.\nDriveaway-towaway operation means\nConviction means an unvacated adju-\nan operation in which an empty or un-\ndication of guilt, or a determination\nladen motor vehicle with one or more\nthat a person has violated or failed to\nsets of wheels on the surface of the\ncomply with the law in a court of origi-\nroadway is being transported:\nnal jurisdiction or by an authorized ad-\n(1) Between vehicle manufacturer\u2019s\nministrative tribunal, an unvacated\nfacilities;\nforfeiture of bail or collateral depos-\n(2) Between a vehicle manufacturer\nited to secure the person\u2019s appearance and a dealership or purchaser;\nin court, a plea of guilty or nolo (3) Between a dealership, or other en-\ncontendere accepted by the court, the tity selling or leasing the vehicle, and\npayment of a fine or court cost, or vio- a purchaser or lessee;\nlation of a condition of release without (4) To a motor carrier\u2019s terminal or\nbail, regardless of whether or not the repair facility for the repair of dis-\npenalty is rebated, suspended, or pro- abling damage (as defined in \u00a7390.5) fol-\nbated. lowing a crash; or\nDirect assistance means transpor- (5) To a motor carrier\u2019s terminal or\ntation and other relief services pro- repair facility for repairs associated\nvided by a motor carrier or its driver(s) with the failure of a vehicle component\nincident to the immediate restoration or system; or\nof essential services (such as, elec- (6) By means of a saddle-mount or\ntricity, medial care, sewer, water, tele- tow-bar.\ncommunications, and telecommuni- Driver means any person who oper-\ncation transmissions) or essential sup- ates any commercial motor vehicle.\nplies (such as, food and fuel). It does Driving a commercial motor vehicle\nnot include transportation related to while under the influence of alcohol\nlong-term rehabilitation of damaged means committing any one or more of\nphysical infrastructure or routine com- the following acts in a CMV: Driving a\nmercial deliveries after the initial CMV while the person\u2019s alcohol con-\ncentration is 0.04 or more; driving\nthreat to life and property has passed.\nunder the influence of alcohol, as pre-\nDirect compensation means payment\nscribed by State law; or refusal to un-\nmade to the motor carrier by the pas-\ndergo such testing as is required by\nsengers or a person acting on behalf of\nany State or jurisdiction in the en-\nthe passengers for the transportation\nforcement of Table 1 to \u00a7383.51 or\nservices provided, and not included in a\n\u00a7392.5(a)(2) of this subchapter.\ntotal package charge or other assess-\nEmergency means any hurricane, tor-\nment for highway transportation serv-\nnado, storm (e.g. thunderstorm, snow-\nices.\nstorm, icestorm, blizzard, sandstorm,\nDisabling damage means damage etc.), high water, wind-driven water,\nwhich precludes departure of a motor tidal wave, tsunami, earthquake, vol-\nvehicle from the scene of the accident canic eruption, mud slide, drought, for-\nin its usual manner in daylight after est fire, explosion, blackout or other\nsimple repairs. occurrence, natural or man-made,\n(1) Inclusions. Damage to motor vehi- which interrupts the delivery of essen-\ncles that could have been driven, but tial services (such as, electricity, med-\nwould have been further damaged if so ical care, sewer, water, telecommuni-\ndriven. cations, and telecommunication trans-\n(2) Exclusions. missions) or essential supplies (such as,\n310\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00322 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\nFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nfood and fuel) or otherwise imme- B of this chapter. The term \u2018\u2018exempt\ndiately threatens human life or public intracity zone\u2019\u2019 does not include any\nwelfare, provided such hurricane, tor- municipality or commercial zone in\nnado, or other event results in: the State of Hawaii. For purposes of\n(1) A declaration of an emergency by \u00a7391.62, a driver may be considered to\nthe President of the United States, the operate a commercial motor vehicle\nGovernor of a State, or their author- wholly within an exempt intracity zone\nized representatives having authority notwithstanding any common control,\nto declare emergencies; by the FMCSA management, or arrangement for a\nField Administrator for the geo- continuous carriage or shipment to or\ngraphical area in which the occurrence from a point without such zone.\nhappens; or by other Federal, State or Exempt motor carrier means a person\nlocal government officials having au- engaged in transportation exempt from\nthority to declare emergencies, or economic regulation by the Federal\n(2) A request by a police officer for Motor Carrier Safety Administration\ntow trucks to move wrecked or dis- (FMCSA) under 49 U.S.C. 13506. \u2018\u2018Ex-\nabled motor vehicles. empt motor carriers\u2019\u2019 are subject to\nEmergency relief means an operation the safety regulations set forth in this\nin which a motor carrier or driver of a subchapter.\ncommercial motor vehicle is providing Farm vehicle driver means a person\ndirect assistance to supplement State who drives only a commercial motor\nand local efforts and capabilities to vehicle that is\u2014\nsave lives or property or to protect (a) Controlled and operated by a\npublic health and safety as a result of farmer as a private motor carrier of\nan emergency as defined in this sec- property;\ntion. (b) Being used to transport either\u2014\nEmployee means any individual, other (1) Agricultural products, or\nthan an employer, who is employed by (2) Farm machinery, farm supplies,\nan employer and who in the course of or both, to or from a farm;\nhis or her employment directly affects (c) Not being used in the operation of\ncommercial motor vehicle safety. Such a for-hire motor carrier;\nterm includes a driver of a commercial (d) Not carrying hazardous materials\nmotor vehicle (including an inde- of a type or quantity that requires the\npendent contractor while in the course commercial motor vehicle to be plac-\nof operating a commercial motor vehi- arded in accordance with \u00a7177.823 of\ncle), a mechanic, and a freight handler. this subtitle; and\nSuch term does not include an em- (e) Being used within 150 air-miles of\nployee of the United States, any State, the farmer\u2019s farm.\nany political subdivision of a State, or Farmer means any person who oper-\nany agency established under a com- ates a farm or is directly involved in\npact between States and approved by the cultivation of land, crops, or live-\nthe Congress of the United States who stock which\u2014\nis acting within the course of such em- (a) Are owned by that person; or\nployment. (b) Are under the direct control of\nEmployer means any person engaged that person.\nin a business affecting interstate com- Fatality means any injury which re-\nmerce who owns or leases a commer- sults in the death of a person at the\ncial motor vehicle in connection with time of the motor vehicle accident or\nthat business, or assigns employees to within 30 days of the accident.\noperate it, but such terms does not in- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminis-\nclude the United States, any State, any trator means the chief executive of the\npolitical subdivision of a State, or an Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminis-\nagency established under a compact be- tration, an agency within the Depart-\ntween States approved by the Congress ment of Transportation.\nof the United States. For-hire motor carrier means a person\nExempt intracity zone means the geo- engaged in the transportation of goods\ngraphic area of a municipality or the or passengers for compensation.\ncommercial zone of that municipality Gross combination weight rating\ndescribed in appendix F to subchapter (GCWR) means the value specified by\n311\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00323 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.5 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\nthe manufacturer as the loaded weight Interstate commerce means trade, traf-\nof a combination (articulated) motor fic, or transportation in the United\nvehicle. In the absence of a value speci- States\u2014\nfied by the manufacturer, GCWR will (1) Between a place in a State and a\nbe determined by adding the GVWR of place outside of such State (including a\nthe power unit and the total weight of place outside of the United States);\nthe towed unit and any load thereon. (2) Between two places in a State\nGross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) through another State or a place out-\nmeans the value specified by the manu- side of the United States; or\nfacturer as the loaded weight of a sin- (3) Between two places in a State as\ngle motor vehicle. part of trade, traffic, or transportation\nHazardous material means a substance originating or terminating outside the\nor material which has been determined State or the United States.\nby the Secretary of Transportation to Intrastate commerce means any trade,\nbe capable of posing an unreasonable traffic, or transportation in any State\nrisk to health, safety, and property which is not described in the term\nwhen transported in commerce, and \u2018\u2018interstate commerce.\u2019\u2019\nwhich has been so designated. Medical examiner means a person who\nHazardous substance means a mate- is licensed, certified, and/or registered,\nrial, and its mixtures or solutions, that in accordance with applicable State\nis identified in the appendix to \u00a7172.101, laws and regulations, to perform phys-\nList of Hazardous Substances and Re- ical examinations. The term includes\nportable Quantities, of this title when but is not limited to, doctors of medi-\noffered for transportation in one pack- cine, doctors of osteopathy, physician\nage, or in one transport motor vehicle assistants, advanced practice nurses,\nif not packaged, and when the quantity and doctors of chiropractic.\nof the material therein equals or ex- Motor carrier means a for-hire motor\nceeds the reportable quantity (RQ). carrier or a private motor carrier. The\nThis definition does not apply to petro- term includes a motor carrier\u2019s agents,\nleum products that are lubricants or officers and representatives as well as\nfuels, or to mixtures or solutions of employees responsible for hiring, su-\nhazardous substances if in a concentra- pervising, training, assigning, or dis-\ntion less than that shown in the table patching of drivers and employees con-\nin \u00a7171.8 of this title, based on the re- cerned with the installation, inspec-\nportable quantity (RQ) specified for the tion, and maintenance of motor vehicle\nmaterials listed in the appendix to equipment and/or accessories. For pur-\n\u00a7172.101. poses of subchapter B, this definition\nHazardous waste means any material includes the terms employer, and exempt\nthat is subject to the hazardous waste motor carrier.\nmanifest requirements of the EPA Motor vehicle means any vehicle, ma-\nspecified in 40 CFR part 262 or would be chine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer\nsubject to these requirements absent propelled or drawn by mechanical\nan interim authorization to a State power and used upon the highways in\nunder 40 CFR part 123, subpart F. the transportation of passengers or\nHighway means any road, street, or property, or any combination thereof\nway, whether on public or private prop- determined by the Federal Motor Car-\nerty, open to public travel. \u2018\u2018Open to rier Safety Administration, but does\npublic travel\u2019\u2019 means that the road sec- not include any vehicle, locomotive, or\ntion is available, except during sched- car operated exclusively on a rail or\nuled periods, extreme weather or emer- rails, or a trolley bus operated by elec-\ngency conditions, passable by four- tric power derived from a fixed over-\nwheel standard passenger cars, and head wire, furnishing local passenger\nopen to the general public for use with- transportation similar to street-rail-\nout restrictive gates, prohibitive signs, way service.\nor regulation other than restrictions Multiple-employer driver means a driv-\nbased on size, weight, or class of reg- er, who in any period of 7 consecutive\nistration. Toll plazas of public toll days, is employed or used as a driver by\nroads are not considered restrictive more than one motor carrier.\ngates. Operator\u2014See driver.\n312\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00324 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\nFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nOther terms\u2014Any other term used in Radar detector means any device or\nthis subchapter is used in its com- mechanism to detect the emission of\nmonly accepted meaning, except where radio microwaves, laser beams or any\nsuch other term has been defined else- other future speed measurement tech-\nwhere in this subchapter. In that nology employed by enforcement per-\nevent, the definition therein given sonnel to measure the speed of com-\nshall apply. mercial motor vehicles upon public\nOut-of-service order means a declara- roads and highways for enforcement\ntion by an authorized enforcement offi- purposes. Excluded from this definition\ncer of a Federal, State, Canadian, are radar detection devices that meet\nMexican, or local jurisdiction that a both of the following requirements:\ndriver, a commercial motor vehicle, or (1) Transported outside the driver\u2019s\na motor carrier operation, is out-of- compartment of the commercial motor\nservice pursuant to \u00a7\u00a7386.72, 392.5, vehicle. For this purpose, the driver\u2019s\n395.13, 396.9, or compatible laws, or the compartment of a passenger-carrying\nNorth American Uniform Out-of-Serv- CMV shall include all space designed to\nice Criteria. accommodate both the driver and the\npassengers; and\nPerson means any individual, part-\n(2) Completely inaccessible to, inop-\nnership, association, corporation, busi-\nerable by, and imperceptible to the\nness trust, or any other organized\ndriver while operating the commercial\ngroup of individuals.\nmotor vehicle.\nPrevious employer means any DOT\nRegional Director of Motor Carriers\nregulated person who employed the\nmeans the Field Administrator, Fed-\ndriver in the preceding 3 years, includ-\neral Motor Carrier Safety Administra-\ning any possible current employer.\ntion, for a given geographical area of\nPrincipal place of business means the\nthe United States.\nsingle location designated by the\nResidential district means the terri-\nmotor carrier, normally its head-\ntory adjacent to and including a high-\nquarters, for purposes of identification\nway which is not a business district\nunder this subchapter. The motor car-\nand for a distance of 300 feet or more\nrier must make records required by\nalong the highway is primarily im-\nparts 382, 387, 390, 391, 395, 396, and 397\nproved with residences.\nof this subchapter available for inspec-\nSchool bus means a passenger motor\ntion at this location within 48 hours vehicle which is designed or used to\n(Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holi- carry more than 10 passengers in addi-\ndays excluded) after a request has been tion to the driver, and which the Sec-\nmade by a special agent or authorized retary determines is likely to be sig-\nrepresentative of the Federal Motor nificantly used for the purpose of\nCarrier Safety Administration. transporting preprimary, primary, or\nPrivate motor carrier means a person secondary school students to such\nwho provides transportation of prop- schools from home or from such\nerty or passengers, by commercial schools to home.\nmotor vehicle, and is not a for-hire School bus operation means the use of\nmotor carrier. a school bus to transport only school\nPrivate motor carrier of passengers children and/or school personnel from\n(business) means a private motor car- home to school and from school to\nrier engaged in the interstate transpor- home.\ntation of passengers which is provided Secretary means the Secretary of\nin the furtherance of a commercial en- Transportation.\nterprise and is not available to the pub- Single-employer driver means a driver\nlic at large. who, in any period of 7 consecutive\nPrivate motor carrier of passengers days, is employed or used as a driver\n(nonbusiness) means private motor car- solely by a single motor carrier. This\nrier involved in the interstate trans- term includes a driver who operates a\nportation of passengers that does not commercial motor vehicle on an inter-\notherwise meet the definition of a pri- mittent, casual, or occasional basis.\nvate motor carrier of passengers (busi- Special agent See appendix B to sub-\nness). chapter B\u2014Special agents.\n313\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00325 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.7 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\nState means a State of the United (3) Words imparting the present tense\nStates and the District of Columbia include the future tense.\nand includes a political subdivision of a (b) In this subchapter the word\u2014\nState. (1) Officer includes any person au-\nTrailer includes: thorized by law to perform the duties\n(a) Full trailer means any motor vehi- of the office;\ncle other than a pole trailer which is (2) Writing includes printing and\ndesigned to be drawn by another motor typewriting;\nvehicle and so constructed that no part (3) Shall is used in an imperative\nof its weight, except for the towing de- sense;\nvice, rests upon the self-propelled tow- (4) Must is used in an imperative\ning motor vehicle. A semitrailer sense;\nequipped with an auxiliary front axle (5) Should is used in a recommenda-\n(converter dolly) shall be considered a tory sense;\nfull trailer. (6) May is used in a permissive sense;\n(b) Pole trailer means any motor vehi- and\ncle which is designed to be drawn by (7) Includes is used as a word of inclu-\nanother motor vehicle and attached to sion, not limitation.\nthe towing motor vehicle by means of a\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988, as amended at 60\n\u2018\u2018reach\u2019\u2019 or \u2018\u2018pole,\u2019\u2019 or by being\nFR 38744, July 28, 1995]\n\u2018\u2018boomed\u2019\u2019 or otherwise secured to the\ntowing motor vehicle, for transporting\nSubpart B\u2014General Requirements\nlong or irregularly shaped loads such\nand Information\nas poles, pipes, or structural members,\nwhich generally are capable of sus-\n\u00a7390.9 State and local laws, effect on.\ntaining themselves as beams between\nthe supporting connections. Except as otherwise specifically indi-\n(c) Semitrailer means any motor vehi- cated, subchapter B of this chapter is\ncle, other than a pole trailer, which is not intended to preclude States or sub-\ndesigned to be drawn by another motor divisions thereof from establishing or\nvehicle and is constructed so that some enforcing State or local laws relating\npart of its weight rests upon the self- to safety, the compliance with which\npropelled towing motor vehicle. would not prevent full compliance with\nTruck means any self-propelled com- these regulations by the person subject\nmercial motor vehicle except a truck thereto.\ntractor, designed and/or used for the\n\u00a7390.11 Motor carrier to require ob-\ntransportation of property.\nservance of driver regulations.\nTruck tractor means a self-propelled\nWhenever in part 325 of subchapter A\ncommercial motor vehicle designed\nor in this subchapter a duty is pre-\nand/or used primarily for drawing other\nscribed for a driver or a prohibition is\nvehicles.\nimposed upon the driver, it shall be the\nUnited States means the 50 States and\nduty of the motor carrier to require ob-\nthe District of Columbia.\nservance of such duty or prohibition. If\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988] the motor carrier is a driver, the driver\nshall likewise be bound.\nEDITORIALNOTE: For FEDERALREGISTERci-\ntations affecting \u00a7390.5, see the List of CFR\n\u00a7390.13 Aiding or abetting violations.\nSections Affected, which appears in the\nFinding Aids section of the printed volume No person shall aid, abet, encourage,\nand on GPO Access. or require a motor carrier or its em-\nployees to violate the rules of this\n\u00a7390.7 Rules of construction.\nchapter.\n(a) In part 325 of subchapter A and in\nthis subchapter, unless the context re- \u00a7390.15 Assistance in investigations\nquires otherwise: and special studies.\n(1) Words imparting the singular in- (a) A motor carrier must make all\nclude the plural; records and information pertaining to\n(2) Words imparting the plural in- an accident available to an authorized\nclude the singular; representative or special agent of the\n314\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00326 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/MisidentifiedTowCompany/CFR-2005-title49-vol5-sec390-5.pdf", "filename": "CFR-2005-title49-vol5-sec390-5.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2025-12-02T17:32:36.175918", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/24C06401.pdf", "filename": "24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:24.323265", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell", "recipient_email": "JMS_HELL@yahoo.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm.", "body": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm. Thank you.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:49 AM wrote:\nDEAR RYAN:\nSorry for the delay. It\u2019s been a rather hectic week.\nYour next court hearing is August 20 at 9:30 a.m. The judge authorized you to appear via Zoom for this hearing.\nAre you available today at around 3:00 p.m. to have a teleconference to discuss your case?\nSincerely,\nBrian Chase\nLaw Offices of Brian Chase, PLLC\n7 E Street S.E.\nQuincy, WA 98848\n(509) 787-9000\n(F) (509) 787-9040\nNOTICE:\nThis electronic communication and any attachments may contain privileged or other confidential information and\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nremain for the sole use of the named addressee, who is the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use,\ndisclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply email\nand immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments without copying, transmitting, or\ndisclosing the contents. Thank you.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:23 PM\nTo: Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell \nSubject: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304\nGood morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for\nme to appear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to\ngo over the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all\ncouncils assigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to\ncite formally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a\nyear.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record,\nabout the urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD\nfile though and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the\npark.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the\ntime of alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she\nmade to conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd\nrescue with these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work\nthe 911 centers They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know\nbetter than that. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other\ncommon sense stuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering\nsimple critical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and\n\u201cwhy didn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and\nfederal relief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail\nof sloppy cover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty\nattempt to cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and there\nhave been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel, presumably\nunder some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom 911. I\u2019ve been lied\nto on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse to consult for over 9\nmonths. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his office. When I arrived to\nwatch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces of video that would put the\nprosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy scrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names threatening\nto assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again and get them to\nintervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone\nand say \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow operator\nsaid \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s free to go\nby me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false but entirely\ninflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty maddening. Because I\nnot only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed as they destroyed my\ntransmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over 2900 all said on that.\nAnd I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER investigations\ninto Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then settled lawsuit\nan ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king county medical\nexaminers. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s evidence\nof needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to us.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were\nnot allowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding\nirreversible irreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911\ncalls; and also I think one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the\nspoilation of my voice audio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her\nto not let my passenger die. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council\nmember then Jeremiah shows up, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website.\nLook around the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made\nregarding dispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can murder\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nme but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can block me\naway then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case\n2 attachments\n07-05-24 24C06401 Hell Ryan Report.pdf\n1623K\nID#8385903208920250714161223.pdf\n991K", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:31.134320", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=\u2026=msg-f:1831672489715170539&simpl=msg-f:1831672489715170539&mb=1 Page 1 of 5", "summary": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:26.269281", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified\nof me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice\nto share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not\nonly make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:32.123328", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed\nto me but the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong\ndoing and expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls\ncontrary to the claim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position\nthat you did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this\ninformation. Tampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts\n(although this would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting\nare crimes. There are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and\nhave no ability to charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who\ncan charge a felony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on\nprosecutors and governments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy,\nevidence. Certainly, despite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set\npeople up. I just do not see that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several\npoeple, typically police, working outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not\ngenerally a multi-agency coverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple\npolice, a person or persons who can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data\nthere, and the tow truck company. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and\nfreedom (as these would all be clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I\nreally just do not see that happening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms\nof evidence, they did not bother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial\nregarding the alleged threats themselves will have to come from their testimony.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah\nworked for rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I\nspoke to had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged\nher and she persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID\nFOR. How many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor\nabsolute Brady related potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of\nthe emergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and\nsome symptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so\nbadly I had to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of\nitself which will be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on\nour experience together, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me\nparanoid and claiming I was trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright\nlie and you are absolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and\nI proactively dismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t\njudge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania\njersey Maryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life\nlessons with small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being\nbuddies with a sheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down\nmultimillion dollar jobs because I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the\ngrandma who was their clerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the\ndoubt that I\u2019m not your average udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it\ncompletely refusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some\nwacky conspiracy concern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell\nservice and were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and\ndrive us to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the\nhospital. I asked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then\nsaying an ambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This\nlie was a trick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too\nfar to go for help. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no\ntow. There was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road\nwith two flats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you\nguys keep mentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off\nthat same night with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to\nthe dispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The\ntire was flat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and\nthe wheel before getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes\na ton of these.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because\nthere\u2019s everyone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated\nimpound bill dispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that\nclarified also and on the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the\nai generated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all\nof which was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back\nmachine internet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam\nall sorts of red tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of\nproving my innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the\nred Tacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them\napproaching at a pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the\ndisagrees called in on me so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of\nraising my hands and calmly indicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was\nout of the view of their dash cams and they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to\nshoot and even falsely claiming I was holding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again;\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nall I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s life. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed\nand never asked for. I was beaten threatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold\nblood by co-conspirators. Because their force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in\nconjunction with the bad actors who originated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of\ndoze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of your portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect\nlocation of arrest can be used to alter the timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the\nleast, needed to get near any bridge. And the implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues\nwhich I am exhaustively trying to outline as exculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself.\nAnyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor altercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical\nlocation of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain\nof evidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026\nand the father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s\na horrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence,\nassigning ineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his\nluck BUT NOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only\nimagine what might have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we\nwere kidnapped and denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They\ntried to extort me for unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my\ntruck presumably for a abandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is\nfalse, especially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one\nbut you is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and\nthey kept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely\nskeptical and think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some\ntime to think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that\nyou didn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring\nlight to the to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nof the employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to\npress that we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s\nfor two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY\nCREATED HER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all\nalong. I showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded\nby either Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:27.811293", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file this into the record Sean,", "summary": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford.", "body": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford. Help with\nher shopping, her chores, shopping, laundry and her dogs which i am helping her train. I have told Juystin during the\nfirst week, in a hearing at the courthouse, I requested access to ask the court for provisions for mrs Hrpcha and Titus\ninformed me that he didnt see her listed as a \"witness\", therefor there was no problem at that time with mrs Hrpcha\nbeing in contact with me.\nMy concern now would be restrictions on communication with mrs Hrpcha, if I add her as a witness. Obviously\nthis is a matter with importance since I generally see Mrs Hrpcha every day and she is in fact going to be driving me to\ncourt on monday.\nWhat are your thoughts?\nThank you\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:49 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nAlright, I can file it into the court file and provide it as discovery to the prosecutor.\nHowever, if the case proceeds to trial, the court the court will want live testimony from fact witnesses.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:19 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file this into the record\nSean,\nUntil otherwise informed, I am still reliant on you and need you to file this onto the record into evidence please.\nThank you.\nGmail - Re: Please file this into the record 1/3/26, 12:15 PM\nStatement, voluntary, from passenger Gina\nDisability certification, for passenger Gina", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:28.971303", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\n3 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\n4 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me\nfor unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or endorse\nthem. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false, especially\ncitations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their property.\nI am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat to get a\ngun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated the\nthreat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this seems\nlike a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since the\nalleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make that\nthey get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "filename": "SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.15, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:51.410483", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy Sean,", "summary": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion!", "body": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion! Brilliant idea, counsel\u2019!\nHere is some further clarification regarding the relevance of Protocol 33, as cited in my prior correspondence, and to\naddress your request for the source of this protocol. This information directly supports my motion to preserve\nevidence, as it establishes that RiverCom 911\u2019s handling of my 911 call violated mandatory emergency medical\ndispatch protocols, potentially constituting evidence tampering or negligence relevant to my case. Below, I outline the\nregulatory framework, RiverCom\u2019s adherence to these protocols, and their implications.\n1. Overview of Protocol 33 in Emergency Medical Dispatch Protocol 33 is a component of the Medical Priority\nDispatch System (MPDS), a standardized protocol used by 911 dispatch centers to triage and respond to medical\nemergency calls. Specifically, Protocol 33 addresses urgent medical emergencies, including inter-facility transfers and\nconditions such as suspected strokes or severe diabetic crises. It requires dispatchers to:\n\u2022 Classify the call based on reported symptoms.\n\u2022 Dispatch appropriate emergency medical services (EMS), such as paramedics.\n\u2022 Maintain the call\u2019s priority level unless a qualified medical professional (e.g., paramedic or physician) provides\ndocumented clearance.\nIn my case, the 911 call reported a potential stroke and a passenger with Type 1 diabetes who had not received\ninsulin, food, or water for two days\u2014both qualifying as medical emergencies under Protocol 33. The dispatcher\u2019s\nreduction of this call to a \u201croadside call\u201d without triage, medical assessment, or clearance violates these standards.\n2. RiverCom 911\u2019s Adherence to MPDS and Protocol 33 RiverCom 911, which serves Chelan and Douglas Counties,\nexplicitly utilizes the MPDS, including Protocol 33, as part of its dispatch operations. This is documented on\nRiverCom\u2019s official resources and training materials, accessible via their website (www.rivercom911.org). Specifically:\n\u2022 RiverCom\u2019s \u201cAbout Us\u201d and \u201cServices\u201d sections confirm that their dispatchers are trained and certified in MPDS\nprotocols to ensure compliance with national and state standards for emergency response.\n\u2022 RiverCom 911 Training Manual (referenced in their training materials) mandates the use of MPDS for all medical\nemergency calls, aligning with industry best practices for 911 operations.\nThis establishes that RiverCom is bound by Protocol 33\u2019s requirements when handling medical emergency calls, such\nas mine.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\n3. Washington State\u2019s Regulatory Authority Washington State further mandates compliance with MPDS protocols,\nincluding Protocol 33, through its regulatory framework for emergency medical services:\n\u2022 WAC 246-976-001 and WAC 246-976-182: These regulations, under the Washington Administrative Code, govern\nemergency medical services and require 911 dispatch centers to adhere to standardized protocols, protocols like\nMPDS to ensure proper EMS response to medical emergencies. WAC 246-976-182 specifically mandates that\ndispatchers dispatchers align EMS response with the reported severity of the call\u2019s severity.\n\u2022 RCW 70.168: This statute establishes the state\u2019s emergency medical Services and trauma care system, system\nrequiring coordinated dispatch responses to medical emergencies, emergencies consistent with protocols like MPDS.\nThese laws obligate RiverCom to follow Protocol 33, ensuring that medical emergencies are not improperly\ndowngraded without proper medical justification.\n4. Relevance to My Motion and Brady Implications The dispatcher\u2019s failure to follow Protocol 33 in my case\u2014\ndowngrading a medical emergency without triage or clearance\u2014raises concerns about evidence integrity, as the CAD\nfile reflects this improper action. This is directly relevant to my motion to preserve evidence, including CAD files,\ndispatch logs, radio communications, and metadata, to investigate potential tampering or negligence. Under Brady v.\nMaryland (373 U.S. 83 (1963)), the prosecution is obligated to disclose exculpatory evidence, including evidence of\nprocedural violations or tampering that could undermine the credibility of the state\u2019s case. The violation of Protocol 33\nconstitutes such evidence, as it suggests mishandling of my 911 call that could have impacted the incident\u2019s outcome.\n5. Request for Action Given the above, I respectfully request that you:\n\u2022 Incorporate this information into our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to my motion to preserve evidence.\n\u2022 Emphasize the Brady implications of RiverCom\u2019s protocol violation.\n\u2022 Pursue forensic analysis of the CAD file and related evidence to determine if tampering occurred, as the date\ndiscrepancy (May 27, 2025) remains unresolved despite your ambiguous / vague explanation citing \u201cin the range of\nwhen you requested it\u201d.\nPlease confirm receipt of this email and advise on next steps. If you require additional documentation or legal\ncitations, I am happy to assist in providing them.\nI\u2019m not a lawyer and I never attended law school or graduated a legal or social program. But I am capable of utilizing a\nnetwork of resources to provide help occasionally and I don\u2019t mind helping you with portions of the job which your\nAlma mater left out of corricul. Holefully someday this knowledge comes into play for one of your dui clients who you\ndefend.\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\nSincerely,\nRyan Hell\n267-777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:44 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n(1) Whether to pursue a plea deal or not is your call.\n(2) I'll file a short response today.\n(3) Where does this information about protocol 33 come from?\n(4) The 5/27/25 date corresponds to the time frame that I submitted the public records request to\nobtain the CAD log. This is consistent with other public records requests that I have made.\nThey have a portal here: https://rivercom911.org/public-records/\nPublic Records - RiverCom 911\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nHow RiverCom Responds to a Request for Public Records RiverCom will acknowledge a request for public\nrecords within five (5) business days of receiving the request, by one of the following: Provide the record\nAcknowledge the receipt of the request and provide a reasonable estimate of time to respond to and/or\ncomplete the request Request clarification of the record request\nrivercom911.org\n(5) I have also requested information on the license plate you have requested which you believe is\nSally Bagshaw.\n(6) I'll just give you the bottom line so you can decide if you want to ask for a new attorney on Monday\nor what.\nI think the odds this situation was orchestrated by some former disgraced Seattle employee and/or\nsome former city attorney is probably close to zero. I do not really engage or follow in conspiratorial\ncommunities or thinking and I am just looking at this for what it appears to be.\nIt seems more likely that you did get stuck in a remote area you believed would cut through back to the\nroads, but it did not, and you were stranded in hot weather with a passenger who was having a\nmedical emergency. You then called 911 for help.\nWhether you did or did not ask for it, they sent a tow truck and an off-duty dispatcher, Jeremiah\nJohnson, to find the truck. Jeremiah Johnson took you and the passenger back to his house. At some\npoint, the tow truck people started asking you to pay them for the tow.\nThere was a dispute over whether you should pay them at all and also that you had previously\ndisclosed to them that you were homeless and did not have any money. Thus, they should not have\nexpected payment.\nIt is around this time that they are alleging that during this dispute, you made a statement which\nconveyed something to the effect of \"you will take a bullet before you take my truck\" although the\nstatements from them seem to have varying versions of this alleged threat.\nIt was at this point, the guy's wife started filming on her phone and that he called the police.\nThe argument continued (without any further threat allegations from you), the wife makes some\nstatements and her own threat towards you. The husband approaches you around this same time\nframe and gets pretty close to the point where you pull out what appears to be a knife and then put it\naway. Both he and you called the cops.\nThen the cops arrived, essentially just taking the other people at their word, and arrested you.\nI still do not believe at this point that you have identified any particular defense to the allegation except\nto \"change the narrative.\"\nIf this case proceeds to trial, a judge will determine what comes into evidence and what does not. A\njury will hear the evidence that the judge lets in. That jury will be provided with a packet of papers\ncalled jury instructions which will outline some legal principles. Several of these documents will pertain\nto what the crime of harassment is legally defined as. The only thing the jury is called on to do is do\ndecide if the State, through the prosecutor, has proven that you committed these crimes beyond a\nreasonable doubt.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nThe base WPIC is here (and cites to several other ones): https://govt.westlaw.com/wcrji/Document/\nI093c5d8ba75611dd8931e514b9d4bd12?viewType=FullText&originationContext=\nView Document - Washington Criminal Jury Instructions - Westlaw\nTitle of crime. For ease of reference, the committee has referred to this crime as \u201cfelony harassment.\u201d\nThe word \u201cfelony\u201d should not be included unless the jury is also being instructed on the gross\nmisdemeanor form of the crime, WPIC 36.07.\ngovt.westlaw.com\nThere is no possibility during this trial that anyone besides you gets convicted of anything. Anyone\ncharged would get their own separate trial if they were ever charged. The only potential outcomes are\nthat the jury finds you guilty, not guilty, or cannot make a decision and there is a hung jury or mis-trial,\nwhich leaves open the possibility of another trial.\nIf you are convicted, you will have the right to appeal.\nWhile certain things will be relevant towards the potential bias of law enforcement or the parties\ninvolved (that at least Johnson was a dispatcher), it will be the jury that decides who is credible, or not,\nfactoring that bias in.\nMost of the potential jury pool is going to be just ordinary people who live in Chelan County. While\nsome may enjoy conspiracies, it is unlikely that all, or even most, of them will. And my assumption\nwould be that most, if not all, will not. It is also likely the judge will limit the evidence presented at trial\nto things they deem relevant to the issue of guilt, based upon the rules of evidence, and is probably\nnot even going to allow any tin-foil hat sort of stuff, although that will be their call.\nUltimately, you will likely need to testify in this case (although you have the right not to), if you want to\npresent your side of the case to the jury. Most likely, they are going to want to know if you made the\nalleged statement or not. If you did, they will want to know if it was a serious threat. If you did not, they\nwill want to know why these people are making this up. I do not think they will buy some story about a\nconspiracy to set you up in the middle of nowhere in Malaga, Washington and shake you down for a\nthousand dollars.\nIf you did make the statement, there are still some potential defenses as the threat, if made, was\napparently conditional, only in defense of your property, and in the context of a relatively long\nargument.\nJeremiah Johnson tells the cop in the video at about 37:45 that he wasn't worried about \"stepping it\nup\" until the knife portion, which was after well after the alleged threat.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Friday, June 20, 2025 6:03 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File\nDiscrepancy\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy\nSean,\nI am writing to ensure our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to the motion to preserve forensic metadata and\nlogs, scheduled for hearing next week, clearly addresses two critical issues:\n- a likely violation of International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD)\nprotocols by the RiverCom 911 dispatcher\n- a suspicious date discrepancy in the provided CAD file.\nThese issues are directly relevant to my defense against the felony harassment charges (RCW 9A.36.046) and\nconstitute exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, as they could demonstrate evidence tampering and\nmisrepresentation of my intent during the July 4, 2024, incident.\nThe CAD file for my initial 911 call confirms I reported a medical emergency for my type 1 diabetic passenger, who\nwas in possible insulin shock, underscoring my urgent request for help. However, the dispatcher marked the call as\n\u201cnot medical\u201d at the end, falsely claiming I retracted the emergency by stating my passenger was fine\u2014a claim I\nadamantly deny.\nUnder IAED EMD guidelines, specifically Protocol 33 for diabetic emergencies, dispatchers must assign a\nhigh-priority code (e.g., Delta) and dispatch an ambulance unless there is clear, documented evidence of\nretraction or on-scene medical verification that no emergency exists.\nNo such evidence exists, as I consistently pleaded for an ambulance.\nThe dispatcher\u2019s reclassification without justification violates EMD protocols and suggests an attempt to\ndownplay the medical emergency, aligning with the prosecution\u2019s narrative that I threatened individuals\nover a (non-existent) tow bill dispute, as emphasized in the harassment CAD file (call number 240700787).\nThe dispatcher\u2019s conduct during the call was highly unprofessional and irregular.\nShe answered rudely, saying, \u201cWhat? What do you want?\u201d and initially garbled her identity, only clarifying it was\nRiverCom 911 after I pressed her.\nWhen I requested an ambulance, she refused, stating, \u201cIt\u2019s the 4th of July, honey, there are no ambulances,\u201d and\ninsisted a mechanic inspect my truck\u2019s flat tire as a condition for any help.\nI refused repairs or towing to avoid potential extortion but agreed to a visual inspection only to secure ambulatory\nassistance, stipulating no repair bills.\nHer prior knowledge of my truck\u2019s condition within seconds of my initial call; which I hadn\u2019t mentioned, and her\nrefusal to dispatch an ambulance without mechanic involvement are absent from the CAD file, indicating possible\nomission or editing.\nThese actions breach IAED EMD protocols, which prioritize medical response over unrelated conditions, and\nsupport my claim that the dispatcher\u2019s handling was targeted and prejudiced, possibly tied to broader evidence\nmanipulation in this case.\nThe CAD Master Call Table for the harassment call (240700787), visibly dated 05/27/25, raises further concerns.\nThis date, nearly a year after the incident on July 4, 2024, suggests the file may have been edited, exported, or\naltered before being provided in discovery.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nCAD systems log modifications with timestamps and user IDs, and a future date could indicate tampering to align\nwith the prosecution\u2019s narrative.\nMetadata analysis, as requested in our forensics motion, could confirm when and by whom this file was accessed or\nedited, directly challenging the integrity of the evidence used against me.\nThe dispatchers felony harassment CAD file also references a prior call (likely 24C06391) where my passenger and\nI were assisted but omits critical medical details, further suggesting selective reporting to frame me as aggressive\nrather than a person acting under duress to save a life.\nTo strengthen our defense, please include the following in the rebuttal:\n(1) Argue that the dispatcher\u2019s reclassification of my medical call as \u201cnot medical\u201d violates IAED EMD Protocol 33,\nlacking documented evidence of retraction, and request access to RiverCom\u2019s audit logs to verify the change\u2019s\nlegitimacy.\n(2) Highlight the 05/27/25 date discrepancy on the CAD file as evidence of potential tampering, necessitating\nmetadata analysis to confirm its modification history.\nThese points are exculpatory, as they could prove the prosecution\u2019s evidence was manipulated to misrepresent my\nactions, undermining the harassment charges.\nPlease confirm by email that this rebuttal has been filed by June 23, 2025.\nSincerely, Ryan :)", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:30.140312", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are\nterrified of me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the\nloudest voice to share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my\nDUTY to not only make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/duplicate.pdf", "filename": "duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:41:18.773739", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/heidi.pdf", "filename": "heidi.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:50.451475", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.", "body": "Gmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRyan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a\nconflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit\nmurder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask\nyou to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect\neveryone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of\nJuly for them. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was\nintroduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the\nStenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get\nher formal name. MOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL\nPROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of\nbecome a political target OF; SALLY BAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What\nis more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by\nthe alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t\nmean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and\nthe incidents here are only indicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July\n4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service\naside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in\ntheir pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000.\nI reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my\ntruck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill.\nRyan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed\nand texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at\nleast 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with\nsome preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a\nproper working email. I have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail\nand clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades. I have been proactive in\nobtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing\ncourt clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had\nconcerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did\nnot reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time\nearlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on\n911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside assistance for the\nflat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and\nrun my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products throughout the state, for 7 years\nwhile attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I\nrespect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after\ntactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do\nme and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I\nwill present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court.\nAgain I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs\nby judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth\nworks and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events\nnamely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations\n1 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nhad been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount of\nthis eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful\ninventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he was in fact every\nbit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and\nhe moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle. Accusations came out and Murray denied\nthem. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us\nwho had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong\nwill the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that\nplaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot\nof us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only\nsaid Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the\ncase is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I\nsimply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray\nlies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this apply to our case? In the incident,\nas I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were\ngonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed onsite. I then heard a woman\nfrantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go\nnow just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing she was yet another piece\nof evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a\ncareer politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a\nsenior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she\nhad aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers\npresented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to\nkeep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach,\nprobably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed\nMurray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a\ndisgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy\ncreating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express\nstimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even\nmafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express\nour intended message. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between\nsome things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my\nname tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by\nprofessional contractors. That FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat\nunfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work\nwalking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She\nwas robbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They\nnever caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019.\nI\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a\ndesert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and photos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we\nenjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had\nmy own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting\nvisitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all.\nAbsolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my\nlicense plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it.\nThen Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to\ntry to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and\nshe is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since\n2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a\nformer SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate\nfor me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the\nway the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\n2 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\n[Quoted text hidden]\n4 attachments\n3 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg\n53K\n527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-D3D164A07FFC.jpeg\n54K\nIMG_6448.jpeg\n1435K\nIMG_6452.jpeg\n3778K\n4 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/Gmail_-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "size_mb": 5.72, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:49.497468", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A.", "body": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A. 46. 020. 2bii Felony Harassment Threats to Kill.\nDuring my intersctiona with Ryan I took notice of how at ti-11 he appeared to be\nparanoid and had rapid speech. He seemed to believe things such H how people\nwere after him and wanted to kill hi111.\nSgt, Musgrove obtained a signed written statement from\n( 1. Although I will transcribe these stateNnt in\nJlt'J\nnarrative to the\nbest of my ability, please review their written statement as a part of your\nreview of this case.\n\"Mid day on 7-4-24 I learned of a stranded motorist on Colockum Paas Rd, which\nis not tar fro\u25a0 my residence. I went to help the stranded 1110tori11ts as one of\nthem was diabetic and waa not feeling well. Upon arrival, the male and female\nboth looked very hot, and the fensle was not feeling well. I told both of them\nwho I waa and that I waa a volunteer firefighter and was offering to take them\nback to my place, out of the heat, to wait for the tow coq,any that had been\ncalled. Both the 11111le and felllllle were very appreciative for the help. We loaded\neveryone into Jlf'J personal vehicle and returned to my house, including their 2\ndoga. Ille sat in my shop and waited for the tow company. At one point prior to\nreturning to my place, the male tried to give me 1110ney, which I refused, stating\nthe reason I was helping was to get them out of the heat, and the fe11111lea\ndiabetic issues, which were resolved with orange juice and some candy.\nApproxi11111tely 1,5 hours after arriving at fir/ place, the tow coiapany returned\nwith their truck, having replaced a flat tire and driving it out for them. I waa\nin the shop and walked outside where the male half was talking with the tow\nco111p11ny. He then said that we were trying to acam hi\u2022 as he walked up and got in\nmy face, accusing me of tricking him into a aca111. He became 1110re irate, and then\nstated that he was going to leave and get guns, conie back and shoot the place\nup. Thia is when I called Rivercoa and asked Lg to step it up, as they were\nalready enroute. The male continued to yell and accuse of iq,eraonating a\n11111\ncity equoyee and yelling obenities. He began calling my wife na11111a. I told him\nhe needed to calm down, and he reacted by peeling his veat off and pulled a\nfolding knife off hia hip, opened it, and stood in a stance ready to fight. I\ncalled Rivercom again and stayed on the line until LE was out with the male.\u2022\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written statements from\nAlthough I will transcribe these atate111ent in my narrative to the beat of Jlt'J\nability, please review their written atate-nt aa a part of your review of this\ncase.\n\"I Drove with my Husband Jeremiah to help out ao- people that were in Need of\nHelp aa we got there a lady and a man was there I then gave the wo11111n aon, water\ndue to She was the one that needed help 1110re. Apond Notice there truck had a\nflat tire and riding on ri111e, the man said that he would pay ua for the ride\ndown till a tow truck came and got the truck we told him that was not needed\njust pay our part forward then we told him that he need to take up pay for tow\nwith thein, everything was fine till tow pick up truck and they told him he\nneeded to money for the tow, they talked for a few then the man got into my\nhuabanda face an~ told hia that 1101118 one was going to get hurt and shot if thP.y\ntake hill true-;;, aft~r that. I ., lat\"terl to recored and then he pulled a knife and\ngot that on v.ledo aa well, lie began taking crap to 111e ao I got a little mouthey.\nhe was all over the board. With threatening\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written state-nt from ),\nAlthough I will transcribe these statement in my narrative to the beat of my\nability, please review their written statement aa a part of your review of this\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/police-reports/Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "filename": "Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "size_mb": 0.33, "modified": "2025-12-02T10:54:36.489516", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated\nthe threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this\nseems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since\nthe alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make\nthat they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/legal-comms/pdf/shawnEstworthy.pdf", "filename": "shawnEstworthy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-03T21:42:52.384490", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "chelan\n(Criminal) 509-667-\n6202(W)\nCompose Defendant (WIP) HELL, RYAN MICHAEL\nDATE EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT INDEX\nInbox 21,216 LANDLORD ASSISTANCE: https://kcll.org/forms-main/\nMultifamily Housing Association (Supplier Directory)\nStarred EVENTS\nRental Housing Association of Washington (Vendor Directory)\nSnoozed 07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance Findings and Order Index # 1\nWashington Landlord Association\nSent\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Probable Cause Index # 2\nDrafts 74 SAGE 509-663-7446 Domestic Violence Protection Orders & assistance with some family matters. All Mail 07/05/2024 Order Establishing Conditions of Release Index # 3\nWENATCHEE VALLEY DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER www.wbdrc.org\nPurchases 158\n07/05/2024 Order for Protection From Civil Harassment Index # 4\nTravel 194 Washington State Bar Association\nMore Provides various programs at www.wsba.org/resources-and-services/find legal help\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance Index # 5\nWashington Web Lawyer Provides a website where low-income clients with civil legal problems in Washington State post their legal questions online and receive advice from pro bono attorneys.", "body": "chelan\n(Criminal) 509-667-\n6202(W)\nCompose Defendant (WIP) HELL, RYAN MICHAEL\nDATE EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT INDEX\nInbox 21,216 LANDLORD ASSISTANCE: https://kcll.org/forms-main/\nMultifamily Housing Association (Supplier Directory)\nStarred EVENTS\nRental Housing Association of Washington (Vendor Directory)\nSnoozed 07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance Findings and Order Index # 1\nWashington Landlord Association\nSent\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Probable Cause Index # 2\nDrafts 74 SAGE 509-663-7446 Domestic Violence Protection Orders & assistance with some family matters.\nAll Mail 07/05/2024 Order Establishing Conditions of Release Index # 3\nWENATCHEE VALLEY DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER www.wbdrc.org\nPurchases 158\n07/05/2024 Order for Protection From Civil Harassment Index # 4\nTravel 194 Washington State Bar Association\nMore Provides various programs at www.wsba.org/resources-and-services/find legal help\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance Index # 5\nWashington Web Lawyer Provides a website where low-income clients with civil legal problems in Washington State post their legal questions online and receive advice from pro bono attorneys. Visit them\nonline at WAWebLawyer.org.\nLabels\nPAGE 1 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nChelanSuperiorCourt \u00b7 Moderate Means Program: For Reduced Fee Legal Help fill out an online application to see if you qualify for reduced fee services through WSBA\u2019S Moderate Means Program.\nFail2Ban\nPage 2 of 7\nBest regards,\nJudicial Misconduct Oly\u2026\nCHELAN\nMarty Young\nNews'es\nCASE SUMMARY\nChelan County Clerk\nNotes\n350 Orondo Ave, Ste 501 CASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nFail2Ban Wenatchee WA 98801\n509-667-6380 07/05/2024 Receipts Index # 6\nFAIL2BAN\nCHELAN COUNTY SHERIFF\nNotice: All emails sent to this address will be received by the Chelan County email system and may be subject to public disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW and to archiving and review.\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Indigency Index # 7.99\nOne attachment \u2022 Scanned by Gmail Add to Drive\n07/05/2024 Report Index # 8.99\nCOURT'S RISK ASSESSMENT\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form Index # 9.99\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form Index # 10.99\ncase summary 24\u2026 07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form Index # 11.99\n07/09/2024 Notice of Appearance and Request for Discovery Index # 12\n07/09/2024 Notice of Hearing Index # 13\nReply Forward\n07/09/2024 Information Index # 14\n07/17/2024 Acknowledgement of Advice of Rights Index # 15\nUpgrade\n07/17/2024 Order Setting Trial Date Index # 16\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/court-documents/CaseSummary_24-1-00253-04.pdf", "filename": "CaseSummary_24-1-00253-04.pdf", "size_mb": 3.83, "modified": "2026-02-16T21:27:46.569527", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nChecksum 4948024b8b2aac96c5e06a7d077592b0\nFilename AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_2729470\n9-2.mp4\nFilesize 605 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 Base Media v1 [IS0 14496-12:2003]\nMinorversion 0.2.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 iso2\n2 avc1\n3 mp41\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nModifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTimescale 1000\nDuration 1:13:18\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 1/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nPreviewduration 0 s\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTrackmodifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 1:13:18\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 704\nImageheight 480\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 704\nSourceimageheight 480\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nVideoframerate 14.985\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nMediamodifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 2/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nMediatimescale 24000\nMediaduration 1:13:18\nMedialanguagecode und\nHandlerdescription SoundHandler\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 24000\nHandlertype Metadata\nHandlervendorid Apple\nEncoder Lavf56.40.100\nMediadatasize 601756659\nMediadataoffset 3104114\nImagesize 704x480\nMegapixels 0.338\nAvgbitrate 1.09 Mbps\nRotation 0\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 3/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 704\nHeight 480\nCoded Width 704\nCoded Height 480\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 50\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 15000/1001\nAvg Frame Rate 484434143/32327541\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 395857007\nDuration 4398.411189\nBit Rate 999808\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 65911\nExtradata Size 105\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 4/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nLanguage und\nHandler Name VideoHandler\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 5/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 24000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nTime Base 1/24000\nStart Pts 864\nStart Time 0.036\nDuration Ts 105563510\nDuration 4398.479583\nBit Rate 94688\nNb Frames 103090\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 6/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nLanguage und\nHandler Name SoundHandler\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 4398.515583\nSize 604860773\nBit Rate 1100118\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand isom\nMinor Version 512\nCompatible Brands isomiso2avc1mp41\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 7/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nEncoder Lavf56.40.100\nRaw Header 00 00 00 20 66 74 79 70 69 73 6F 6D 00 00 02\n00 69 73 6F 6D 69 73 6F 32 61 76 63 31 6D 70\n34 31 00 2F 5D 42 6D 6F 6F 76 00 00 00 6C 6D\n76 68 64 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n00 00 03 E8 00 43 1D 90 00 01 00 00 01 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 8/8\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/ProofOfEvidenceTampering/AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27294709-2.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27294709-2.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.26, "modified": "2025-12-02T18:53:39.214528", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nChecksum 5491a833bacfdeaed408f4861984e0f6\nFilename 20240704_173916.mp4\nFilesize 107 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 v2 [ISO 14496-14]\nMinorversion 0.0.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 mp42\nMediadatasize 107010106\nMediadataoffset 40\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nModifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTimescale 10000\nDuration 0:00:50\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nPreviewduration 0 s\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 1/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nPlaymode SEQ_PLAY\nAuthor Samsung SM-A426U\nAndroidversion 13\nAndroidcapturefps 30\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackmodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 0:00:50\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 1920\nImageheight 1080\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 1920\nSourceimageheight 1080\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nColorprofiles nclx\nColorprimaries BT.709\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 2/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTransfercharacteristics BT.709\nMatrixcoefficients BT.709\nVideoframerate 30.119\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediamodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediatimescale 48000\nMediaduration 0:00:50\nHandlertype Audio Track\nHandlerdescription SoundHandle\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 48000\nImagesize 1920x1080\nMegapixels 2.1\nAvgbitrate 17.3 Mbps\nRotation 90\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 3/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 1920\nHeight 1080\nCoded Width 1920\nCoded Height 1080\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 40\nColor Range tv\nColor Space bt709\nColor Transfer bt709\nColor Primaries bt709\nChroma Location left\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 30/1\nAvg Frame Rate 7465000/247849\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 4461282\nDuration 49.5698\nBit Rate 17014702\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 4/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 1493\nExtradata Size 35\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name VideoHandle\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 5/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nSide Data List\n0\nSide Data Type Display Matrix\nDisplaymatrix 00000000: 0\n65536 0\n00000001: -65536\n0 0\n00000002: 0\n0 1073741824\nRotation -90\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 48000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 6/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTime Base 1/48000\nStart Pts 3048\nStart Time 0.0635\nDuration Ts 2374619\nDuration 49.471229\nBit Rate 256015\nNb Frames 2319\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 7/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name SoundHandle\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 49.5698\nSize 107034115\nBit Rate 17274084\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand mp42\nMinor Version 0\nCompatible Brands isommp42\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.000000Z\nCom.android.version 13\nCom.android.capture.fps 30\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 8/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nRaw Header 00 00 00 18 66 74 79 70 6D 70 34 32 00 00\n00 00 69 73 6F 6D 6D 70 34 32 00 00 00 01\n6D 64 61 74 00 00 00 00 06 60 D8 4A 21 11\n45 00 14 50 01 46 FF F1 0A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 9/9\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/ProofOfEvidenceTampering/MULTIPLEForensicsIndicationsofTampering20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "MULTIPLEForensicsIndicationsofTampering20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.27, "modified": "2025-12-02T18:49:00.051053", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Submission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nUnited States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Report successfully submitted\nYour record number is: 705740-PNG\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights violations, spot\ntrends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.", "body": "Submission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nUnited States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division.\nReport successfully submitted\nYour record number is: 705740-PNG\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights violations, spot\ntrends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.\n2 Our specialists determine the next step\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the Justice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report. If so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your report and will\nrecommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid organization.\n3 When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not always be able to\nprovide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 1 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you provided in this report.\nDepending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you need to reach us about your report,\nplease refer to your report number when contacting us. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat you can do next\n1 Contact local legal aid organizations or a lawyer if you haven\u2019t already\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help you with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices), to help you find a legal aid lawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2 Get help immediately if you are in danger\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still experiencing physical\nharm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911 and contact the police.\nYour submission\nContact\nContact information\nYour name\nRyan Hell\nEmail address\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nPhone number\n+12677772344\nAddress\n11015 10th ave sw\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 2 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\n-\nSeattle, Washington 98144\nAre you now or have ever been an active duty service member?\nNo\nPrimary concern\nWhat is your primary reason for contacting the Civil Rights Division?\nSomething else happened\nLocation\nWhere did this happen?\nOrganization name\n350 Orondo Ave. Suite 501\nAddress\n-\n-\nWenatchee, Washington\nPersonal characteristics\nDo you believe any of these personal characteristics influenced why you were treated this way?\nDisability (including temporary or recovered and including HIV and drug addiction)\nFamily, marital, or parental status\nReligion\nOther reason\nDate\nWhen did this happen?\n1/26/2026\nPersonal description\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 3 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nIn your own words, describe what happened\nrel to prior doj rept for kidnapping under color of law during 911 medical duress call in state park 4th july\n2024. Falsely charged to disappear me I fear... and the case is still going, today at trial readiness PD and\njudge said ready: I asserted ONGOING unanwered problems w/ court reporter present most of first year of\nproceedings, was same woman introduced as alleged vics mother at crime scene. Judge is redacting and\naltering docket ahs also removed evidence all w/o telling me. Changed judges names in docket history\nalso. Appointed FIVE attorneys in total now all have refused to engage, all quit, docket chabged on that\nalso. dashcam footage tampered I found using forensics tools. 3d manip, Ai tool micro alter easily see,\ncalled sheriff to report, that night atrny copied ovver, delet. I have screen shots. Judge has rebuked my\nmotiuon to preserve evidence and forensics for 16 MNTHS. A retrd VIP, chief pros, FLED crime scene as\nsheriffs waited. TODAY I ASSERTED THESE FACTS AGAIN and the judge said he is sending me to eastern\nstate. PLEASE HELP; this is a coordinated conspiracy to silence me for whistleblowing! I HAVE MOUN-\nTAINS of evidence at my ryanhellfacts . com This operation utilized a 911 system and its op manager, to\ndivert my duress call. Then the op man came disguised as a volunteer, then raced us out into another\ncanyon to an isolated home where my passengers and my phone did not work. We were held from 1PM\nwhen call 911 until my arrest for alleged thrts. I was punched int he head while thre op man held a gun over\nme. I NEVER faught I have a SOLID LAWSUIT so i just smiled waiited for deputies... the op man panicked\nafter the plan to incite a fight so he could shoot me dead failed i think. THE 911 companu is Rivercom 911\nand is part privately owned by sheriff and VIP's. Its an illegal intel operation and was used to facilitate an\nattmot MURDER. They let the op man go after 18 YEARS.. and the 911 company is finally moving OFF of\ncounty land too now. They JUST retired the coroner and he was not retuirement age, so I fear the worse,\nTODAY THE JUDGE ORDERED ME TO EASTERN STATE MENTAL EVAL just for saying the coiurt is railroad-\ning me and identifying the excessive evidence, in summary, which would clearly prove that. PLEAASE\nHELP. I AM NOIT GUYILTY OF ANYTHING EXCEPT LIFE SAVING PATIENCE AND DETERMINATION and\nadesperate cabal of corrupt and illegal lawmen and politicos are desperately attempting to bury me....\nEastern State mental hospital is a cess pool of death its in the news routinely over lawsuits now. I am ab-\nsolutley rational and sane and not on drugs. PLEASE HELP\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 4 of 4\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/evidence/department_of_justice/DoJ-705740-PNG_January_25_2026.pdf", "filename": "DoJ-705740-PNG_January_25_2026.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T21:16:51.818309", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n09/04/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nANNUAL REPORT DUE DATE NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI Number: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed business en\u0000ty\u2019s annual report is due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n09/04/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nANNUAL REPORT DUE DATE NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI Number: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed business en\u0000ty\u2019s annual report is due on 10/31/2024. To remain in ac\u0000ve status, please submit an\nannual report by the due date above. Please verify that the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email\naddress, and update as needed.\nFailure to file the necessary report will result in delinquent status and may result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or\ntermina\u0000on of your registra\u0000on.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nEffec\u0000ve January 1, 2024:\nFile a Beneficial Ownership Informa\u0000on Report with the U.S. Treasury\u2019s Financial Crimes Enforcement\nNetwork (FinCEN). Business en\u0000\u0000es formed or registered prior to January 1, 2024, must file an ini\u0000al\nbeneficial ownership report before January 1, 2025. Updates or correc\u0000ons to a previously filed beneficial\nownership reports must be submi\u0000ed within 30 days of becoming aware of the change.\nFor a current link to file the beneficial ownership informa\u0000on report and addi\u0000onal informa\u0000on, see our\nwebsite at h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons under the Business En\u0000ty tab.\nTo ask about available alterna\u0000ve methods for submi\u0000ng a filing or form for the visually impaired, please call 360-\n725-0377. Teletype (TTY) users may use the Washington Relay Service by calling 711.\nFor a rapid response to ques\u0000ons, requests for assistance, or to provide feedback, please visit the Corpora\u0000ons and\nChari\u0000es website at h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons to chat with a representa\u0000ve.\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/BandTTowSSNoticeofDissolutioin.pdf", "filename": "BandTTowSSNoticeofDissolutioin.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.927660", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: \nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS. Ryan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: \nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to make\nit off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was not\ncarrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911 service).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to accompany\nthe male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator, and I\nneeded to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle has\nbeen done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as auto\ntheft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let us\ngo, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an unknown\nfemales voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The man yelled \u201cyou\nhave to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where he is?!\u201d And the\nman yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here trying\nto do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take capture that\nevidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming behaviors and\nconduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They performed a\nbizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front (dash cam I\npresume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm voice that I am non-\ncombative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and made repeated threats\nto shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a mere 20 feet away, broad\ndaylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one more\nword. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I am\ncomplying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said the\nnext time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as I\ncompiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard trying\nto dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and I\nslammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they claimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log) \u201che\ndoesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to let\nme know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to why\nthat delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in. I\npolitely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he wanted\nto part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to come\nview video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was floored by the\negregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on video. The video\nsupports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other than to put my hands\nip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing their\nclaim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "email_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.979648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM\nGmail - Urgent: Brady Motion and Hearing Prep https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that\nany unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies\nof the original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_BradyMotionClarificationForSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_BradyMotionClarificationForSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.712657", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a\nconflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit\nmurder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask\nyou to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect\neveryone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of\nJuly for them. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was\nintroduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the\nStenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get\nher formal name. MOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL\nPROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of\nbecome a political target OF; SALLY BAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What\nis more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by\nthe alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t\nmean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and\nthe incidents here are only indicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July\n4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service\naside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in\ntheir pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000.\nI reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my\ntruck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill.\nRyan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed\nand texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at\nleast 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with\nsome preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a\nproper working email. I have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail\nand clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades. I have been proactive in\nobtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing\ncourt clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had\nconcerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did\nnot reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time\nearlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on\n911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside assistance for the\nflat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and\nrun my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products throughout the state, for 7 years\nwhile attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I\nrespect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after\ntactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do\nme and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I\nwill present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court.\nAgain I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs\nby judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth\nworks and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nnamely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations\nhad been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount of\nthis eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful\ninventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he was in fact every\nbit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and\nhe moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle. Accusations came out and Murray denied\nthem. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us\nwho had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong\nwill the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that\nplaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot\nof us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only\nsaid Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the\ncase is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I\nsimply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray\nlies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this apply to our case? In the incident,\nas I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were\ngonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed onsite. I then heard a woman\nfrantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go\nnow just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing she was yet another piece\nof evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a\ncareer politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a\nsenior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she\nhad aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers\npresented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to\nkeep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach,\nprobably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed\nMurray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a\ndisgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy\ncreating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express\nstimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even\nmafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express\nour intended message. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between\nsome things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my\nname tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by\nprofessional contractors. That FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat\nunfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work\nwalking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She\nwas robbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They\nnever caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019.\nI\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a\ndesert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and photos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we\nenjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had\nmy own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting\nvisitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all.\nAbsolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my\nlicense plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it.\nThen Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to\ntry to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and\nshe is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since\n2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a\nformer SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate\nfor me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the\nway the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\n2 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\nHi Ryan,\nWe actually have court today. I am glad your phone is working. Are you able to come to court today?\nThe judge would like you here in person if possible. If not, I can try to get it moved until Wednesday or next Monday\nbut let me know what would work for you.\nThanks,\nOn Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:26 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\n3 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\nGmail - Re: Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nI have a working phone again. I will try to call you tomorrow around 9am.\nRyan\n(267)777-2344\n4 attachments\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg\n53K\n527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-D3D164A07FFC.jpeg\n54K\nIMG_6448.jpeg\n1435K\nIMG_6452.jpeg\n3778K\n4 of 4 1/24/26, 2:26 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Titus-Warrant-Quash-and-Bagshaw-Ideintified-Feb-14-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_Titus-Warrant-Quash-and-Bagshaw-Ideintified-Feb-14-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 5.72, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.312652", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nStatus on conflict of interest with court personnel\nRyan Hell Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 4:12 AM\nTo: \nBrian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nStatus on conflict of interest with court personnel\nRyan Hell Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 4:12 AM\nTo: \nBrian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of company\nand home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled B&T of\ncashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving behind my\npickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man eventually\nsurrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and he\nadmitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on and\naired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As it\nwas, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down the\nrabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal residence\u201d. I\ncan\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the mountain\nof discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is the\nfact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non rivercom\nnon CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and commit murder.\nNone of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t seeing what\u2019s\nclearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any moral\nreason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s really\ndumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner campaign\ncontributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he ADOPTED\nthen molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected, there\u2019s been much\nconvo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the office of Seattle mayor?\nCome on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being silenced like this then let\u2019s note\nthat.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly criminal\nactions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure that\naccountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better things\nto do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and constitutional\nrights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence was tampered.\nAnd most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was conspired by\nJeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom operations and\ntechnology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and Wenatchee fire.\nWa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich programmatically\nshould have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t get\nit. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified of\nme roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice to\nshare it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not only\nmake a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "email_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.692657", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\n3 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\n4 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me\nfor unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or endorse\nthem. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false, especially\ncitations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their property.\nI am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat to get a\ngun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated the\nthreat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this seems\nlike a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since the\nalleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make that\nthey get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "filename": "email_SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.15, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.815646", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/24C06401.pdf", "filename": "24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.590668", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged\nand confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any\nunauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies of\nthe original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:33 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_SeansBradyResponseAndOopsIforgotSomeVideos-June-16-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_SeansBradyResponseAndOopsIforgotSomeVideos-June-16-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.442642", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "; crowe@seattletimes.com; cwinfrey@seattletimes.com; DHS FOIA Public", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Urgent Legal Case - Evidence of Government Misconduct CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you", "summary": "CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you\nrecognize and/or trust the sender.", "body": "CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you\nrecognize and/or trust the sender. Contact your component SOC with questions or concerns.\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon. I desperately need legal representation or media attention.\nRyan Hell(267) 777-2344", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct.pdf", "filename": "email_RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct.pdf", "size_mb": 0.07, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.875647", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy Sean,", "summary": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion!", "body": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion! Brilliant idea, counsel\u2019!\nHere is some further clarification regarding the relevance of Protocol 33, as cited in my prior correspondence, and to\naddress your request for the source of this protocol. This information directly supports my motion to preserve\nevidence, as it establishes that RiverCom 911\u2019s handling of my 911 call violated mandatory emergency medical\ndispatch protocols, potentially constituting evidence tampering or negligence relevant to my case. Below, I outline the\nregulatory framework, RiverCom\u2019s adherence to these protocols, and their implications.\n1. Overview of Protocol 33 in Emergency Medical Dispatch Protocol 33 is a component of the Medical Priority\nDispatch System (MPDS), a standardized protocol used by 911 dispatch centers to triage and respond to medical\nemergency calls. Specifically, Protocol 33 addresses urgent medical emergencies, including inter-facility transfers and\nconditions such as suspected strokes or severe diabetic crises. It requires dispatchers to:\n\u2022 Classify the call based on reported symptoms.\n\u2022 Dispatch appropriate emergency medical services (EMS), such as paramedics.\n\u2022 Maintain the call\u2019s priority level unless a qualified medical professional (e.g., paramedic or physician) provides\ndocumented clearance.\nIn my case, the 911 call reported a potential stroke and a passenger with Type 1 diabetes who had not received\ninsulin, food, or water for two days\u2014both qualifying as medical emergencies under Protocol 33. The dispatcher\u2019s\nreduction of this call to a \u201croadside call\u201d without triage, medical assessment, or clearance violates these standards.\n2. RiverCom 911\u2019s Adherence to MPDS and Protocol 33 RiverCom 911, which serves Chelan and Douglas Counties,\nexplicitly utilizes the MPDS, including Protocol 33, as part of its dispatch operations. This is documented on\nRiverCom\u2019s official resources and training materials, accessible via their website (www.rivercom911.org). Specifically:\n\u2022 RiverCom\u2019s \u201cAbout Us\u201d and \u201cServices\u201d sections confirm that their dispatchers are trained and certified in MPDS\nprotocols to ensure compliance with national and state standards for emergency response.\n\u2022 RiverCom 911 Training Manual (referenced in their training materials) mandates the use of MPDS for all medical\nemergency calls, aligning with industry best practices for 911 operations.\nThis establishes that RiverCom is bound by Protocol 33\u2019s requirements when handling medical emergency calls, such\nas mine.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\n3. Washington State\u2019s Regulatory Authority Washington State further mandates compliance with MPDS protocols,\nincluding Protocol 33, through its regulatory framework for emergency medical services:\n\u2022 WAC 246-976-001 and WAC 246-976-182: These regulations, under the Washington Administrative Code, govern\nemergency medical services and require 911 dispatch centers to adhere to standardized protocols, protocols like\nMPDS to ensure proper EMS response to medical emergencies. WAC 246-976-182 specifically mandates that\ndispatchers dispatchers align EMS response with the reported severity of the call\u2019s severity.\n\u2022 RCW 70.168: This statute establishes the state\u2019s emergency medical Services and trauma care system, system\nrequiring coordinated dispatch responses to medical emergencies, emergencies consistent with protocols like MPDS.\nThese laws obligate RiverCom to follow Protocol 33, ensuring that medical emergencies are not improperly\ndowngraded without proper medical justification.\n4. Relevance to My Motion and Brady Implications The dispatcher\u2019s failure to follow Protocol 33 in my case\u2014\ndowngrading a medical emergency without triage or clearance\u2014raises concerns about evidence integrity, as the CAD\nfile reflects this improper action. This is directly relevant to my motion to preserve evidence, including CAD files,\ndispatch logs, radio communications, and metadata, to investigate potential tampering or negligence. Under Brady v.\nMaryland (373 U.S. 83 (1963)), the prosecution is obligated to disclose exculpatory evidence, including evidence of\nprocedural violations or tampering that could undermine the credibility of the state\u2019s case. The violation of Protocol 33\nconstitutes such evidence, as it suggests mishandling of my 911 call that could have impacted the incident\u2019s outcome.\n5. Request for Action Given the above, I respectfully request that you:\n\u2022 Incorporate this information into our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to my motion to preserve evidence.\n\u2022 Emphasize the Brady implications of RiverCom\u2019s protocol violation.\n\u2022 Pursue forensic analysis of the CAD file and related evidence to determine if tampering occurred, as the date\ndiscrepancy (May 27, 2025) remains unresolved despite your ambiguous / vague explanation citing \u201cin the range of\nwhen you requested it\u201d.\nPlease confirm receipt of this email and advise on next steps. If you require additional documentation or legal\ncitations, I am happy to assist in providing them.\nI\u2019m not a lawyer and I never attended law school or graduated a legal or social program. But I am capable of utilizing a\nnetwork of resources to provide help occasionally and I don\u2019t mind helping you with portions of the job which your\nAlma mater left out of corricul. Holefully someday this knowledge comes into play for one of your dui clients who you\ndefend.\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\nSincerely,\nRyan Hell\n267-777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:44 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n(1) Whether to pursue a plea deal or not is your call.\n(2) I'll file a short response today.\n(3) Where does this information about protocol 33 come from?\n(4) The 5/27/25 date corresponds to the time frame that I submitted the public records request to\nobtain the CAD log. This is consistent with other public records requests that I have made.\nThey have a portal here: https://rivercom911.org/public-records/\nPublic Records - RiverCom 911\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nHow RiverCom Responds to a Request for Public Records RiverCom will acknowledge a request for public\nrecords within five (5) business days of receiving the request, by one of the following: Provide the record\nAcknowledge the receipt of the request and provide a reasonable estimate of time to respond to and/or\ncomplete the request Request clarification of the record request\nrivercom911.org\n(5) I have also requested information on the license plate you have requested which you believe is\nSally Bagshaw.\n(6) I'll just give you the bottom line so you can decide if you want to ask for a new attorney on Monday\nor what.\nI think the odds this situation was orchestrated by some former disgraced Seattle employee and/or\nsome former city attorney is probably close to zero. I do not really engage or follow in conspiratorial\ncommunities or thinking and I am just looking at this for what it appears to be.\nIt seems more likely that you did get stuck in a remote area you believed would cut through back to the\nroads, but it did not, and you were stranded in hot weather with a passenger who was having a\nmedical emergency. You then called 911 for help.\nWhether you did or did not ask for it, they sent a tow truck and an off-duty dispatcher, Jeremiah\nJohnson, to find the truck. Jeremiah Johnson took you and the passenger back to his house. At some\npoint, the tow truck people started asking you to pay them for the tow.\nThere was a dispute over whether you should pay them at all and also that you had previously\ndisclosed to them that you were homeless and did not have any money. Thus, they should not have\nexpected payment.\nIt is around this time that they are alleging that during this dispute, you made a statement which\nconveyed something to the effect of \"you will take a bullet before you take my truck\" although the\nstatements from them seem to have varying versions of this alleged threat.\nIt was at this point, the guy's wife started filming on her phone and that he called the police.\nThe argument continued (without any further threat allegations from you), the wife makes some\nstatements and her own threat towards you. The husband approaches you around this same time\nframe and gets pretty close to the point where you pull out what appears to be a knife and then put it\naway. Both he and you called the cops.\nThen the cops arrived, essentially just taking the other people at their word, and arrested you.\nI still do not believe at this point that you have identified any particular defense to the allegation except\nto \"change the narrative.\"\nIf this case proceeds to trial, a judge will determine what comes into evidence and what does not. A\njury will hear the evidence that the judge lets in. That jury will be provided with a packet of papers\ncalled jury instructions which will outline some legal principles. Several of these documents will pertain\nto what the crime of harassment is legally defined as. The only thing the jury is called on to do is do\ndecide if the State, through the prosecutor, has proven that you committed these crimes beyond a\nreasonable doubt.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nThe base WPIC is here (and cites to several other ones): https://govt.westlaw.com/wcrji/Document/\nI093c5d8ba75611dd8931e514b9d4bd12?viewType=FullText&originationContext=\nView Document - Washington Criminal Jury Instructions - Westlaw\nTitle of crime. For ease of reference, the committee has referred to this crime as \u201cfelony harassment.\u201d\nThe word \u201cfelony\u201d should not be included unless the jury is also being instructed on the gross\nmisdemeanor form of the crime, WPIC 36.07.\ngovt.westlaw.com\nThere is no possibility during this trial that anyone besides you gets convicted of anything. Anyone\ncharged would get their own separate trial if they were ever charged. The only potential outcomes are\nthat the jury finds you guilty, not guilty, or cannot make a decision and there is a hung jury or mis-trial,\nwhich leaves open the possibility of another trial.\nIf you are convicted, you will have the right to appeal.\nWhile certain things will be relevant towards the potential bias of law enforcement or the parties\ninvolved (that at least Johnson was a dispatcher), it will be the jury that decides who is credible, or not,\nfactoring that bias in.\nMost of the potential jury pool is going to be just ordinary people who live in Chelan County. While\nsome may enjoy conspiracies, it is unlikely that all, or even most, of them will. And my assumption\nwould be that most, if not all, will not. It is also likely the judge will limit the evidence presented at trial\nto things they deem relevant to the issue of guilt, based upon the rules of evidence, and is probably\nnot even going to allow any tin-foil hat sort of stuff, although that will be their call.\nUltimately, you will likely need to testify in this case (although you have the right not to), if you want to\npresent your side of the case to the jury. Most likely, they are going to want to know if you made the\nalleged statement or not. If you did, they will want to know if it was a serious threat. If you did not, they\nwill want to know why these people are making this up. I do not think they will buy some story about a\nconspiracy to set you up in the middle of nowhere in Malaga, Washington and shake you down for a\nthousand dollars.\nIf you did make the statement, there are still some potential defenses as the threat, if made, was\napparently conditional, only in defense of your property, and in the context of a relatively long\nargument.\nJeremiah Johnson tells the cop in the video at about 37:45 that he wasn't worried about \"stepping it\nup\" until the knife portion, which was after well after the alleged threat.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Friday, June 20, 2025 6:03 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File\nDiscrepancy\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy\nSean,\nI am writing to ensure our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to the motion to preserve forensic metadata and\nlogs, scheduled for hearing next week, clearly addresses two critical issues:\n- a likely violation of International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD)\nprotocols by the RiverCom 911 dispatcher\n- a suspicious date discrepancy in the provided CAD file.\nThese issues are directly relevant to my defense against the felony harassment charges (RCW 9A.36.046) and\nconstitute exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, as they could demonstrate evidence tampering and\nmisrepresentation of my intent during the July 4, 2024, incident.\nThe CAD file for my initial 911 call confirms I reported a medical emergency for my type 1 diabetic passenger, who\nwas in possible insulin shock, underscoring my urgent request for help. However, the dispatcher marked the call as\n\u201cnot medical\u201d at the end, falsely claiming I retracted the emergency by stating my passenger was fine\u2014a claim I\nadamantly deny.\nUnder IAED EMD guidelines, specifically Protocol 33 for diabetic emergencies, dispatchers must assign a\nhigh-priority code (e.g., Delta) and dispatch an ambulance unless there is clear, documented evidence of\nretraction or on-scene medical verification that no emergency exists.\nNo such evidence exists, as I consistently pleaded for an ambulance.\nThe dispatcher\u2019s reclassification without justification violates EMD protocols and suggests an attempt to\ndownplay the medical emergency, aligning with the prosecution\u2019s narrative that I threatened individuals\nover a (non-existent) tow bill dispute, as emphasized in the harassment CAD file (call number 240700787).\nThe dispatcher\u2019s conduct during the call was highly unprofessional and irregular.\nShe answered rudely, saying, \u201cWhat? What do you want?\u201d and initially garbled her identity, only clarifying it was\nRiverCom 911 after I pressed her.\nWhen I requested an ambulance, she refused, stating, \u201cIt\u2019s the 4th of July, honey, there are no ambulances,\u201d and\ninsisted a mechanic inspect my truck\u2019s flat tire as a condition for any help.\nI refused repairs or towing to avoid potential extortion but agreed to a visual inspection only to secure ambulatory\nassistance, stipulating no repair bills.\nHer prior knowledge of my truck\u2019s condition within seconds of my initial call; which I hadn\u2019t mentioned, and her\nrefusal to dispatch an ambulance without mechanic involvement are absent from the CAD file, indicating possible\nomission or editing.\nThese actions breach IAED EMD protocols, which prioritize medical response over unrelated conditions, and\nsupport my claim that the dispatcher\u2019s handling was targeted and prejudiced, possibly tied to broader evidence\nmanipulation in this case.\nThe CAD Master Call Table for the harassment call (240700787), visibly dated 05/27/25, raises further concerns.\nThis date, nearly a year after the incident on July 4, 2024, suggests the file may have been edited, exported, or\naltered before being provided in discovery.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nCAD systems log modifications with timestamps and user IDs, and a future date could indicate tampering to align\nwith the prosecution\u2019s narrative.\nMetadata analysis, as requested in our forensics motion, could confirm when and by whom this file was accessed or\nedited, directly challenging the integrity of the evidence used against me.\nThe dispatchers felony harassment CAD file also references a prior call (likely 24C06391) where my passenger and\nI were assisted but omits critical medical details, further suggesting selective reporting to frame me as aggressive\nrather than a person acting under duress to save a life.\nTo strengthen our defense, please include the following in the rebuttal:\n(1) Argue that the dispatcher\u2019s reclassification of my medical call as \u201cnot medical\u201d violates IAED EMD Protocol 33,\nlacking documented evidence of retraction, and request access to RiverCom\u2019s audit logs to verify the change\u2019s\nlegitimacy.\n(2) Highlight the 05/27/25 date discrepancy on the CAD file as evidence of potential tampering, necessitating\nmetadata analysis to confirm its modification history.\nThese points are exculpatory, as they could prove the prosecution\u2019s evidence was manipulated to misrepresent my\nactions, undermining the harassment charges.\nPlease confirm by email that this rebuttal has been filed by June 23, 2025.\nSincerely, Ryan :)", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.837646", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A.", "body": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A. 46. 020. 2bii Felony Harassment Threats to Kill.\nDuring my intersctiona with Ryan I took notice of how at ti-11 he appeared to be\nparanoid and had rapid speech. He seemed to believe things such H how people\nwere after him and wanted to kill hi111.\nSgt, Musgrove obtained a signed written statement from\n( 1. Although I will transcribe these stateNnt in\nJlt'J\nnarrative to the\nbest of my ability, please review their written statement as a part of your\nreview of this case.\n\"Mid day on 7-4-24 I learned of a stranded motorist on Colockum Paas Rd, which\nis not tar fro\u25a0 my residence. I went to help the stranded 1110tori11ts as one of\nthem was diabetic and waa not feeling well. Upon arrival, the male and female\nboth looked very hot, and the fensle was not feeling well. I told both of them\nwho I waa and that I waa a volunteer firefighter and was offering to take them\nback to my place, out of the heat, to wait for the tow coq,any that had been\ncalled. Both the 11111le and felllllle were very appreciative for the help. We loaded\neveryone into Jlf'J personal vehicle and returned to my house, including their 2\ndoga. Ille sat in my shop and waited for the tow company. At one point prior to\nreturning to my place, the male tried to give me 1110ney, which I refused, stating\nthe reason I was helping was to get them out of the heat, and the fe11111lea\ndiabetic issues, which were resolved with orange juice and some candy.\nApproxi11111tely 1,5 hours after arriving at fir/ place, the tow coiapany returned\nwith their truck, having replaced a flat tire and driving it out for them. I waa\nin the shop and walked outside where the male half was talking with the tow\nco111p11ny. He then said that we were trying to acam hi\u2022 as he walked up and got in\nmy face, accusing me of tricking him into a aca111. He became 1110re irate, and then\nstated that he was going to leave and get guns, conie back and shoot the place\nup. Thia is when I called Rivercoa and asked Lg to step it up, as they were\nalready enroute. The male continued to yell and accuse of iq,eraonating a\n11111\ncity equoyee and yelling obenities. He began calling my wife na11111a. I told him\nhe needed to calm down, and he reacted by peeling his veat off and pulled a\nfolding knife off hia hip, opened it, and stood in a stance ready to fight. I\ncalled Rivercom again and stayed on the line until LE was out with the male.\u2022\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written statements from\nAlthough I will transcribe these atate111ent in my narrative to the beat of Jlt'J\nability, please review their written atate-nt aa a part of your review of this\ncase.\n\"I Drove with my Husband Jeremiah to help out ao- people that were in Need of\nHelp aa we got there a lady and a man was there I then gave the wo11111n aon, water\ndue to She was the one that needed help 1110re. Apond Notice there truck had a\nflat tire and riding on ri111e, the man said that he would pay ua for the ride\ndown till a tow truck came and got the truck we told him that was not needed\njust pay our part forward then we told him that he need to take up pay for tow\nwith thein, everything was fine till tow pick up truck and they told him he\nneeded to money for the tow, they talked for a few then the man got into my\nhuabanda face an~ told hia that 1101118 one was going to get hurt and shot if thP.y\ntake hill true-;;, aft~r that. I ., lat\"terl to recored and then he pulled a knife and\ngot that on v.ledo aa well, lie began taking crap to 111e ao I got a little mouthey.\nhe was all over the board. With threatening\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written state-nt from ),\nAlthough I will transcribe these statement in my narrative to the beat of my\nability, please review their written statement aa a part of your review of this\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "filename": "Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "size_mb": 0.33, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.885671", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nbeing operated beyond a 75 air-mile ra- (iii) One or more motor vehicles in-\ndius (86.3 statute miles or 138.9 kilo- curring disabling damage as a result of\nmeters) from the driver\u2019s normal work- the accident, requiring the motor vehi-\nreporting location, and provided the cle(s) to be transported away from the\nvehicle does not otherwise meet the scene by a tow truck or other motor\ndefinition of a commercial motor vehi- vehicle. cle, except that motor carriers oper- (2) The term accident does not in-\nating such vehicles are required to clude:\ncomply with \u00a7\u00a7390.15, 390.19, and (i) An occurrence involving only\n390.21(a) and (b)(2).", "body": "Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nbeing operated beyond a 75 air-mile ra- (iii) One or more motor vehicles in-\ndius (86.3 statute miles or 138.9 kilo- curring disabling damage as a result of\nmeters) from the driver\u2019s normal work- the accident, requiring the motor vehi-\nreporting location, and provided the cle(s) to be transported away from the\nvehicle does not otherwise meet the scene by a tow truck or other motor\ndefinition of a commercial motor vehi- vehicle.\ncle, except that motor carriers oper- (2) The term accident does not in-\nating such vehicles are required to clude:\ncomply with \u00a7\u00a7390.15, 390.19, and (i) An occurrence involving only\n390.21(a) and (b)(2). boarding and alighting from a sta-\n(g) Motor carriers that transport haz- tionary motor vehicle; or\nardous materials in intrastate commerce. (ii) An occurrence involving only the\nThe rules in the following provisions of loading or unloading of cargo.\nsubchapter B of this chapter apply to\nAlcohol concentration (AC) means the\nmotor carriers that transport haz-\nconcentration of alcohol in a person\u2019s\nardous materials in intrastate com-\nblood or breath. When expressed as a\nmerce and to the motor vehicles that\npercentage it means grams of alcohol\ntransport hazardous materials in intra-\nper 100 milliliters of blood or grams of\nstate commerce:\nalcohol per 210 liters of breath.\n(1) Part 385, subparts A and E, for\nBus means any motor vehicle de-\ncarriers subject to the requirements of\nsigned, constructed, and or used for the\n\u00a7385.403 of this chapter.\ntransportation of passengers, including\n(2) Part 386, Rules of practice for\ntaxicabs.\nmotor carrier, broker, freight for-\nBusiness district means the territory\nwarder, and hazardous materials pro-\ncontiguous to and including a highway\nceedings, of this chapter.\nwhen within any 600 feet along such\n(3) Part 387, Minimum Levels of Fi-\nhighway there are buildings in use for\nnancial Responsibility for Motor Car-\nbusiness or industrial purposes, includ-\nriers, to the extent provided in \u00a7387.3 of\ning but not limited to hotels, banks, or\nthis chapter.\noffice buildings which occupy at least\n(4) Section 390.19, Motor carrier iden-\n300 feet of frontage on one side or 300\ntification report, and \u00a7390.21, Marking\nfeet collectively on both sides of the\nof CMVs, for carriers subject to the re-\nhighway.\nquirements of \u00a7385.403 of this chapter.\nCharter transportation of passengers\nIntrastate motor carriers operating\nmeans transportation, using a bus, of a\nprior to January 1, 2005, are excepted\ngroup of persons who pursuant to a\nfrom \u00a7390.19(a)(1).\ncommon purpose, under a single con-\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988, as amended at 54 tract, at a fixed charge for the motor\nFR 12202, Mar. 24, 1989; 58 FR 33776, June 21, vehicle, have acquired the exclusive\n1993; 59 FR 8752, Feb. 23, 1994; 59 FR 67554, use of the motor vehicle to travel to-\nDec. 29, 1994; 62 FR 1296, Jan. 9, 1997; 63 FR\ngether under an itinerary either speci-\n33276, June 18, 1998; 64 FR 48516, Sept. 3, 1999;\nfied in advance or modified after hav-\n66 FR 2766, Jan. 11, 2001; 68 FR 47875, Aug. 12,\n2003; 69 FR 39372, June 30, 2004] ing left the place of origin.\nCommercial motor vehicle means any\n\u00a7390.5 Definitions. self-propelled or towed motor vehicle\nUnless specifically defined elsewhere, used on a highway in interstate com-\nin this subchapter: merce to transport passengers or prop-\nAccident means\u2014 erty when the vehicle\u2014\n(1) Except as provided in paragraph (1) Has a gross vehicle weight rating\n(2) of this definition, an occurrence in- or gross combination weight rating, or\nvolving a commercial motor vehicle gross vehicle weight or gross combina-\noperating on a highway in interstate or tion weight, of 4,536 kg (10,001 pounds)\nintrastate commerce which results in: or more, whichever is greater; or\n(i) A fatality; (2) Is designed or used to transport\n(ii) Bodily injury to a person who, as more than 8 passengers (including the\na result of the injury, immediately re- driver) for compensation; or\nceives medical treatment away from (3) Is designed or used to transport\nthe scene of the accident; or more than 15 passengers, including the\n309\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00321 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.5 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\ndriver, and is not used to transport pas- (i) Damage which can be remedied\nsengers for compensation; or temporarily at the scene of the acci-\n(4) Is used in transporting material dent without special tools or parts.\nfound by the Secretary of Transpor- (ii) Tire disablement without other\ntation to be hazardous under 49 U.S.C. damage even if no spare tire is avail-\n5103 and transported in a quantity re- able.\nquiring placarding under regulations (iii) Headlamp or taillight damage.\nprescribed by the Secretary under 49 (iv) Damage to turn signals, horn, or\nCFR, subtitle B, chapter I, subchapter windshield wipers which makes them\ninoperative.\nC.\nDriveaway-towaway operation means\nConviction means an unvacated adju-\nan operation in which an empty or un-\ndication of guilt, or a determination\nladen motor vehicle with one or more\nthat a person has violated or failed to\nsets of wheels on the surface of the\ncomply with the law in a court of origi-\nroadway is being transported:\nnal jurisdiction or by an authorized ad-\n(1) Between vehicle manufacturer\u2019s\nministrative tribunal, an unvacated\nfacilities;\nforfeiture of bail or collateral depos-\n(2) Between a vehicle manufacturer\nited to secure the person\u2019s appearance and a dealership or purchaser;\nin court, a plea of guilty or nolo (3) Between a dealership, or other en-\ncontendere accepted by the court, the tity selling or leasing the vehicle, and\npayment of a fine or court cost, or vio- a purchaser or lessee;\nlation of a condition of release without (4) To a motor carrier\u2019s terminal or\nbail, regardless of whether or not the repair facility for the repair of dis-\npenalty is rebated, suspended, or pro- abling damage (as defined in \u00a7390.5) fol-\nbated. lowing a crash; or\nDirect assistance means transpor- (5) To a motor carrier\u2019s terminal or\ntation and other relief services pro- repair facility for repairs associated\nvided by a motor carrier or its driver(s) with the failure of a vehicle component\nincident to the immediate restoration or system; or\nof essential services (such as, elec- (6) By means of a saddle-mount or\ntricity, medial care, sewer, water, tele- tow-bar.\ncommunications, and telecommuni- Driver means any person who oper-\ncation transmissions) or essential sup- ates any commercial motor vehicle.\nplies (such as, food and fuel). It does Driving a commercial motor vehicle\nnot include transportation related to while under the influence of alcohol\nlong-term rehabilitation of damaged means committing any one or more of\nphysical infrastructure or routine com- the following acts in a CMV: Driving a\nmercial deliveries after the initial CMV while the person\u2019s alcohol con-\ncentration is 0.04 or more; driving\nthreat to life and property has passed.\nunder the influence of alcohol, as pre-\nDirect compensation means payment\nscribed by State law; or refusal to un-\nmade to the motor carrier by the pas-\ndergo such testing as is required by\nsengers or a person acting on behalf of\nany State or jurisdiction in the en-\nthe passengers for the transportation\nforcement of Table 1 to \u00a7383.51 or\nservices provided, and not included in a\n\u00a7392.5(a)(2) of this subchapter.\ntotal package charge or other assess-\nEmergency means any hurricane, tor-\nment for highway transportation serv-\nnado, storm (e.g. thunderstorm, snow-\nices.\nstorm, icestorm, blizzard, sandstorm,\nDisabling damage means damage etc.), high water, wind-driven water,\nwhich precludes departure of a motor tidal wave, tsunami, earthquake, vol-\nvehicle from the scene of the accident canic eruption, mud slide, drought, for-\nin its usual manner in daylight after est fire, explosion, blackout or other\nsimple repairs. occurrence, natural or man-made,\n(1) Inclusions. Damage to motor vehi- which interrupts the delivery of essen-\ncles that could have been driven, but tial services (such as, electricity, med-\nwould have been further damaged if so ical care, sewer, water, telecommuni-\ndriven. cations, and telecommunication trans-\n(2) Exclusions. missions) or essential supplies (such as,\n310\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00322 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\nFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nfood and fuel) or otherwise imme- B of this chapter. The term \u2018\u2018exempt\ndiately threatens human life or public intracity zone\u2019\u2019 does not include any\nwelfare, provided such hurricane, tor- municipality or commercial zone in\nnado, or other event results in: the State of Hawaii. For purposes of\n(1) A declaration of an emergency by \u00a7391.62, a driver may be considered to\nthe President of the United States, the operate a commercial motor vehicle\nGovernor of a State, or their author- wholly within an exempt intracity zone\nized representatives having authority notwithstanding any common control,\nto declare emergencies; by the FMCSA management, or arrangement for a\nField Administrator for the geo- continuous carriage or shipment to or\ngraphical area in which the occurrence from a point without such zone.\nhappens; or by other Federal, State or Exempt motor carrier means a person\nlocal government officials having au- engaged in transportation exempt from\nthority to declare emergencies, or economic regulation by the Federal\n(2) A request by a police officer for Motor Carrier Safety Administration\ntow trucks to move wrecked or dis- (FMCSA) under 49 U.S.C. 13506. \u2018\u2018Ex-\nabled motor vehicles. empt motor carriers\u2019\u2019 are subject to\nEmergency relief means an operation the safety regulations set forth in this\nin which a motor carrier or driver of a subchapter.\ncommercial motor vehicle is providing Farm vehicle driver means a person\ndirect assistance to supplement State who drives only a commercial motor\nand local efforts and capabilities to vehicle that is\u2014\nsave lives or property or to protect (a) Controlled and operated by a\npublic health and safety as a result of farmer as a private motor carrier of\nan emergency as defined in this sec- property;\ntion. (b) Being used to transport either\u2014\nEmployee means any individual, other (1) Agricultural products, or\nthan an employer, who is employed by (2) Farm machinery, farm supplies,\nan employer and who in the course of or both, to or from a farm;\nhis or her employment directly affects (c) Not being used in the operation of\ncommercial motor vehicle safety. Such a for-hire motor carrier;\nterm includes a driver of a commercial (d) Not carrying hazardous materials\nmotor vehicle (including an inde- of a type or quantity that requires the\npendent contractor while in the course commercial motor vehicle to be plac-\nof operating a commercial motor vehi- arded in accordance with \u00a7177.823 of\ncle), a mechanic, and a freight handler. this subtitle; and\nSuch term does not include an em- (e) Being used within 150 air-miles of\nployee of the United States, any State, the farmer\u2019s farm.\nany political subdivision of a State, or Farmer means any person who oper-\nany agency established under a com- ates a farm or is directly involved in\npact between States and approved by the cultivation of land, crops, or live-\nthe Congress of the United States who stock which\u2014\nis acting within the course of such em- (a) Are owned by that person; or\nployment. (b) Are under the direct control of\nEmployer means any person engaged that person.\nin a business affecting interstate com- Fatality means any injury which re-\nmerce who owns or leases a commer- sults in the death of a person at the\ncial motor vehicle in connection with time of the motor vehicle accident or\nthat business, or assigns employees to within 30 days of the accident.\noperate it, but such terms does not in- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminis-\nclude the United States, any State, any trator means the chief executive of the\npolitical subdivision of a State, or an Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminis-\nagency established under a compact be- tration, an agency within the Depart-\ntween States approved by the Congress ment of Transportation.\nof the United States. For-hire motor carrier means a person\nExempt intracity zone means the geo- engaged in the transportation of goods\ngraphic area of a municipality or the or passengers for compensation.\ncommercial zone of that municipality Gross combination weight rating\ndescribed in appendix F to subchapter (GCWR) means the value specified by\n311\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00323 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.5 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\nthe manufacturer as the loaded weight Interstate commerce means trade, traf-\nof a combination (articulated) motor fic, or transportation in the United\nvehicle. In the absence of a value speci- States\u2014\nfied by the manufacturer, GCWR will (1) Between a place in a State and a\nbe determined by adding the GVWR of place outside of such State (including a\nthe power unit and the total weight of place outside of the United States);\nthe towed unit and any load thereon. (2) Between two places in a State\nGross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) through another State or a place out-\nmeans the value specified by the manu- side of the United States; or\nfacturer as the loaded weight of a sin- (3) Between two places in a State as\ngle motor vehicle. part of trade, traffic, or transportation\nHazardous material means a substance originating or terminating outside the\nor material which has been determined State or the United States.\nby the Secretary of Transportation to Intrastate commerce means any trade,\nbe capable of posing an unreasonable traffic, or transportation in any State\nrisk to health, safety, and property which is not described in the term\nwhen transported in commerce, and \u2018\u2018interstate commerce.\u2019\u2019\nwhich has been so designated. Medical examiner means a person who\nHazardous substance means a mate- is licensed, certified, and/or registered,\nrial, and its mixtures or solutions, that in accordance with applicable State\nis identified in the appendix to \u00a7172.101, laws and regulations, to perform phys-\nList of Hazardous Substances and Re- ical examinations. The term includes\nportable Quantities, of this title when but is not limited to, doctors of medi-\noffered for transportation in one pack- cine, doctors of osteopathy, physician\nage, or in one transport motor vehicle assistants, advanced practice nurses,\nif not packaged, and when the quantity and doctors of chiropractic.\nof the material therein equals or ex- Motor carrier means a for-hire motor\nceeds the reportable quantity (RQ). carrier or a private motor carrier. The\nThis definition does not apply to petro- term includes a motor carrier\u2019s agents,\nleum products that are lubricants or officers and representatives as well as\nfuels, or to mixtures or solutions of employees responsible for hiring, su-\nhazardous substances if in a concentra- pervising, training, assigning, or dis-\ntion less than that shown in the table patching of drivers and employees con-\nin \u00a7171.8 of this title, based on the re- cerned with the installation, inspec-\nportable quantity (RQ) specified for the tion, and maintenance of motor vehicle\nmaterials listed in the appendix to equipment and/or accessories. For pur-\n\u00a7172.101. poses of subchapter B, this definition\nHazardous waste means any material includes the terms employer, and exempt\nthat is subject to the hazardous waste motor carrier.\nmanifest requirements of the EPA Motor vehicle means any vehicle, ma-\nspecified in 40 CFR part 262 or would be chine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer\nsubject to these requirements absent propelled or drawn by mechanical\nan interim authorization to a State power and used upon the highways in\nunder 40 CFR part 123, subpart F. the transportation of passengers or\nHighway means any road, street, or property, or any combination thereof\nway, whether on public or private prop- determined by the Federal Motor Car-\nerty, open to public travel. \u2018\u2018Open to rier Safety Administration, but does\npublic travel\u2019\u2019 means that the road sec- not include any vehicle, locomotive, or\ntion is available, except during sched- car operated exclusively on a rail or\nuled periods, extreme weather or emer- rails, or a trolley bus operated by elec-\ngency conditions, passable by four- tric power derived from a fixed over-\nwheel standard passenger cars, and head wire, furnishing local passenger\nopen to the general public for use with- transportation similar to street-rail-\nout restrictive gates, prohibitive signs, way service.\nor regulation other than restrictions Multiple-employer driver means a driv-\nbased on size, weight, or class of reg- er, who in any period of 7 consecutive\nistration. Toll plazas of public toll days, is employed or used as a driver by\nroads are not considered restrictive more than one motor carrier.\ngates. Operator\u2014See driver.\n312\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00324 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\nFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT \u00a7390.5\nOther terms\u2014Any other term used in Radar detector means any device or\nthis subchapter is used in its com- mechanism to detect the emission of\nmonly accepted meaning, except where radio microwaves, laser beams or any\nsuch other term has been defined else- other future speed measurement tech-\nwhere in this subchapter. In that nology employed by enforcement per-\nevent, the definition therein given sonnel to measure the speed of com-\nshall apply. mercial motor vehicles upon public\nOut-of-service order means a declara- roads and highways for enforcement\ntion by an authorized enforcement offi- purposes. Excluded from this definition\ncer of a Federal, State, Canadian, are radar detection devices that meet\nMexican, or local jurisdiction that a both of the following requirements:\ndriver, a commercial motor vehicle, or (1) Transported outside the driver\u2019s\na motor carrier operation, is out-of- compartment of the commercial motor\nservice pursuant to \u00a7\u00a7386.72, 392.5, vehicle. For this purpose, the driver\u2019s\n395.13, 396.9, or compatible laws, or the compartment of a passenger-carrying\nNorth American Uniform Out-of-Serv- CMV shall include all space designed to\nice Criteria. accommodate both the driver and the\npassengers; and\nPerson means any individual, part-\n(2) Completely inaccessible to, inop-\nnership, association, corporation, busi-\nerable by, and imperceptible to the\nness trust, or any other organized\ndriver while operating the commercial\ngroup of individuals.\nmotor vehicle.\nPrevious employer means any DOT\nRegional Director of Motor Carriers\nregulated person who employed the\nmeans the Field Administrator, Fed-\ndriver in the preceding 3 years, includ-\neral Motor Carrier Safety Administra-\ning any possible current employer.\ntion, for a given geographical area of\nPrincipal place of business means the\nthe United States.\nsingle location designated by the\nResidential district means the terri-\nmotor carrier, normally its head-\ntory adjacent to and including a high-\nquarters, for purposes of identification\nway which is not a business district\nunder this subchapter. The motor car-\nand for a distance of 300 feet or more\nrier must make records required by\nalong the highway is primarily im-\nparts 382, 387, 390, 391, 395, 396, and 397\nproved with residences.\nof this subchapter available for inspec-\nSchool bus means a passenger motor\ntion at this location within 48 hours vehicle which is designed or used to\n(Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holi- carry more than 10 passengers in addi-\ndays excluded) after a request has been tion to the driver, and which the Sec-\nmade by a special agent or authorized retary determines is likely to be sig-\nrepresentative of the Federal Motor nificantly used for the purpose of\nCarrier Safety Administration. transporting preprimary, primary, or\nPrivate motor carrier means a person secondary school students to such\nwho provides transportation of prop- schools from home or from such\nerty or passengers, by commercial schools to home.\nmotor vehicle, and is not a for-hire School bus operation means the use of\nmotor carrier. a school bus to transport only school\nPrivate motor carrier of passengers children and/or school personnel from\n(business) means a private motor car- home to school and from school to\nrier engaged in the interstate transpor- home.\ntation of passengers which is provided Secretary means the Secretary of\nin the furtherance of a commercial en- Transportation.\nterprise and is not available to the pub- Single-employer driver means a driver\nlic at large. who, in any period of 7 consecutive\nPrivate motor carrier of passengers days, is employed or used as a driver\n(nonbusiness) means private motor car- solely by a single motor carrier. This\nrier involved in the interstate trans- term includes a driver who operates a\nportation of passengers that does not commercial motor vehicle on an inter-\notherwise meet the definition of a pri- mittent, casual, or occasional basis.\nvate motor carrier of passengers (busi- Special agent See appendix B to sub-\nness). chapter B\u2014Special agents.\n313\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00325 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n\u00a7390.7 49 CFR Ch. III (10\u20131\u201305 Edition)\nState means a State of the United (3) Words imparting the present tense\nStates and the District of Columbia include the future tense.\nand includes a political subdivision of a (b) In this subchapter the word\u2014\nState. (1) Officer includes any person au-\nTrailer includes: thorized by law to perform the duties\n(a) Full trailer means any motor vehi- of the office;\ncle other than a pole trailer which is (2) Writing includes printing and\ndesigned to be drawn by another motor typewriting;\nvehicle and so constructed that no part (3) Shall is used in an imperative\nof its weight, except for the towing de- sense;\nvice, rests upon the self-propelled tow- (4) Must is used in an imperative\ning motor vehicle. A semitrailer sense;\nequipped with an auxiliary front axle (5) Should is used in a recommenda-\n(converter dolly) shall be considered a tory sense;\nfull trailer. (6) May is used in a permissive sense;\n(b) Pole trailer means any motor vehi- and\ncle which is designed to be drawn by (7) Includes is used as a word of inclu-\nanother motor vehicle and attached to sion, not limitation.\nthe towing motor vehicle by means of a\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988, as amended at 60\n\u2018\u2018reach\u2019\u2019 or \u2018\u2018pole,\u2019\u2019 or by being\nFR 38744, July 28, 1995]\n\u2018\u2018boomed\u2019\u2019 or otherwise secured to the\ntowing motor vehicle, for transporting\nSubpart B\u2014General Requirements\nlong or irregularly shaped loads such\nand Information\nas poles, pipes, or structural members,\nwhich generally are capable of sus-\n\u00a7390.9 State and local laws, effect on.\ntaining themselves as beams between\nthe supporting connections. Except as otherwise specifically indi-\n(c) Semitrailer means any motor vehi- cated, subchapter B of this chapter is\ncle, other than a pole trailer, which is not intended to preclude States or sub-\ndesigned to be drawn by another motor divisions thereof from establishing or\nvehicle and is constructed so that some enforcing State or local laws relating\npart of its weight rests upon the self- to safety, the compliance with which\npropelled towing motor vehicle. would not prevent full compliance with\nTruck means any self-propelled com- these regulations by the person subject\nmercial motor vehicle except a truck thereto.\ntractor, designed and/or used for the\n\u00a7390.11 Motor carrier to require ob-\ntransportation of property.\nservance of driver regulations.\nTruck tractor means a self-propelled\nWhenever in part 325 of subchapter A\ncommercial motor vehicle designed\nor in this subchapter a duty is pre-\nand/or used primarily for drawing other\nscribed for a driver or a prohibition is\nvehicles.\nimposed upon the driver, it shall be the\nUnited States means the 50 States and\nduty of the motor carrier to require ob-\nthe District of Columbia.\nservance of such duty or prohibition. If\n[53 FR 18052, May 19, 1988] the motor carrier is a driver, the driver\nshall likewise be bound.\nEDITORIALNOTE: For FEDERALREGISTERci-\ntations affecting \u00a7390.5, see the List of CFR\n\u00a7390.13 Aiding or abetting violations.\nSections Affected, which appears in the\nFinding Aids section of the printed volume No person shall aid, abet, encourage,\nand on GPO Access. or require a motor carrier or its em-\nployees to violate the rules of this\n\u00a7390.7 Rules of construction.\nchapter.\n(a) In part 325 of subchapter A and in\nthis subchapter, unless the context re- \u00a7390.15 Assistance in investigations\nquires otherwise: and special studies.\n(1) Words imparting the singular in- (a) A motor carrier must make all\nclude the plural; records and information pertaining to\n(2) Words imparting the plural in- an accident available to an authorized\nclude the singular; representative or special agent of the\n314\nVerDate Aug<31>2005 06:48 Nov 02, 2005 Jkt 205211 PO 00000 Frm 00326 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\205211.XXX 205211\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/CFR-2005-title49-vol5-sec390-5.pdf", "filename": "CFR-2005-title49-vol5-sec390-5.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.459666", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell", "recipient_email": "JMS_HELL@yahoo.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm.", "body": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm. Thank you.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:49 AM wrote:\nDEAR RYAN:\nSorry for the delay. It\u2019s been a rather hectic week.\nYour next court hearing is August 20 at 9:30 a.m. The judge authorized you to appear via Zoom for this hearing.\nAre you available today at around 3:00 p.m. to have a teleconference to discuss your case?\nSincerely,\nBrian Chase\nLaw Offices of Brian Chase, PLLC\n7 E Street S.E.\nQuincy, WA 98848\n(509) 787-9000\n(F) (509) 787-9040\nNOTICE:\nThis electronic communication and any attachments may contain privileged or other confidential information and\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nremain for the sole use of the named addressee, who is the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use,\ndisclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply email\nand immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments without copying, transmitting, or\ndisclosing the contents. Thank you.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:23 PM\nTo: Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell \nSubject: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304\nGood morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for\nme to appear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to\ngo over the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all\ncouncils assigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to\ncite formally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a\nyear.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record,\nabout the urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD\nfile though and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the\npark.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the\ntime of alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she\nmade to conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd\nrescue with these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work\nthe 911 centers They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know\nbetter than that. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other\ncommon sense stuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering\nsimple critical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and\n\u201cwhy didn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and\nfederal relief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail\nof sloppy cover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty\nattempt to cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and there\nhave been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel, presumably\nunder some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom 911. I\u2019ve been lied\nto on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse to consult for over 9\nmonths. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his office. When I arrived to\nwatch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces of video that would put the\nprosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy scrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names threatening\nto assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again and get them to\nintervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone\nand say \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow operator\nsaid \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s free to go\nby me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false but entirely\ninflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty maddening. Because I\nnot only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed as they destroyed my\ntransmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over 2900 all said on that.\nAnd I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER investigations\ninto Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then settled lawsuit\nan ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king county medical\nexaminers. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s evidence\nof needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to us.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were\nnot allowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding\nirreversible irreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911\ncalls; and also I think one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the\nspoilation of my voice audio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her\nto not let my passenger die. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council\nmember then Jeremiah shows up, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website.\nLook around the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made\nregarding dispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can murder\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nme but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can block me\naway then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case\n2 attachments\n07-05-24 24C06401 Hell Ryan Report.pdf\n1623K\nID#8385903208920250714161223.pdf\n991K", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.611668", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "\"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\"", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nPolice Report\n1 message\nBeto Martinez Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:34 AM\nTo: \"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\" \nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.", "body": "Gmail - Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nPolice Report\n1 message\nBeto Martinez Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:34 AM\nTo: \"ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\" \nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\nScan044.pdf\n9631K\n1 of 1 1/24/26, 2:11 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_PoliceReport-JustinTitusAug12-2024.pdf", "filename": "email_PoliceReport-JustinTitusAug12-2024.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.591656", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A.", "body": "Incident Report for Incident 24C06401 PagE\ncounts of RCW 9A. 46. 020. 2bii Felony Harassment Threats to Kill.\nDuring my intersctiona with Ryan I took notice of how at ti-11 he appeared to be\nparanoid and had rapid speech. He seemed to believe things such H how people\nwere after him and wanted to kill hi111.\nSgt, Musgrove obtained a signed written statement from\n( 1. Although I will transcribe these stateNnt in\nJlt'J\nnarrative to the\nbest of my ability, please review their written statement as a part of your\nreview of this case.\n\"Mid day on 7-4-24 I learned of a stranded motorist on Colockum Paas Rd, which\nis not tar my residence. I went to help the stranded 1110tori11ts as one of\nthem was diabetic and waa not feeling well. Upon arrival, the male and female\nboth looked very hot, and the fensle was not feeling well. I told both of them\nwho I waa and that I waa a volunteer firefighter and was offering to take them\nback to my place, out of the heat, to wait for the tow coq,any that had been\ncalled. Both the 11111le and felllllle were very appreciative for the help. We loaded\neveryone into Jlf'J personal vehicle and returned to my house, including their 2\ndoga. Ille sat in my shop and waited for the tow company. At one point prior to\nreturning to my place, the male tried to give me 1110ney, which I refused, stating\nthe reason I was helping was to get them out of the heat, and the fe11111lea\ndiabetic issues, which were resolved with orange juice and some candy.\nApproxi11111tely 1,5 hours after arriving at fir/ place, the tow coiapany returned\nwith their truck, having replaced a flat tire and driving it out for them. I waa\nin the shop and walked outside where the male half was talking with the tow\nco111p11ny. He then said that we were trying to acam hi\u2022 as he walked up and got in\nmy face, accusing me of tricking him into a aca111. He became 1110re irate, and then\nstated that he was going to leave and get guns, conie back and shoot the place\nup. Thia is when I called Rivercoa and asked Lg to step it up, as they were\nalready enroute. The male continued to yell and accuse of iq,eraonating a\n11111\ncity equoyee and yelling obenities. He began calling my wife na11111a. I told him\nhe needed to calm down, and he reacted by peeling his veat off and pulled a\nfolding knife off hia hip, opened it, and stood in a stance ready to fight. I\ncalled Rivercom again and stayed on the line until LE was out with the male.\u2022\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written statements from\nAlthough I will transcribe these atate111ent in my narrative to the beat of Jlt'J\nability, please review their written atate-nt aa a part of your review of this\ncase.\n\"I Drove with my Husband Jeremiah to help out ao- people that were in Need of\nHelp aa we got there a lady and a man was there I then gave the wo11111n aon, water\ndue to She was the one that needed help 1110re. Apond Notice there truck had a\nflat tire and riding on ri111e, the man said that he would pay ua for the ride\ndown till a tow truck came and got the truck we told him that was not needed\njust pay our part forward then we told him that he need to take up pay for tow\nwith thein, everything was fine till tow pick up truck and they told him he\nneeded to money for the tow, they talked for a few then the man got into my\nhuabanda face an~ told hia that 1101118 one was going to get hurt and shot if thP.y\ntake hill true-;;, aft~r that. I ., lat\"terl to recored and then he pulled a knife and\ngot that on v.ledo aa well, lie began taking crap to 111e ao I got a little mouthey.\nhe was all over the board. With threatening\nSgt. Musgrove obtained a signed written state-nt from ),\nAlthough I will transcribe these statement in my narrative to the beat of my\nability, please review their written statement aa a part of your review of this\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "filename": "email_Page5-cpd-pr.pdf", "size_mb": 0.39, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.527643", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified\nof me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice\nto share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not\nonly make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.640668", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "United States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Report successfully submitted\nPlease save your record number for tracking.", "body": "United States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division.\nReport successfully submitted\nPlease save your record number for tracking.\nYour record number is:\n616411-TZV\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights\nviolations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.\n2 Our specialists determine the next step\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the Justice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report. If so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your report and will\nrecommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid organization.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 1 of 4\n3 When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not always be\nable to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you provided in this\nreport. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you need to reach us about\nyour report, please refer to your report number when contacting us. This is how we keep track of\nyour submission.\nWhat you can do next\n1 Contact local legal aid organizations or a lawyer if you haven\u2019t already\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help you with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices), to help you find a legal aid lawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-\nlegal-aid\n2 Get help immediately if you are in danger\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still experiencing\nphysical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911 and contact the police.\nYour submission\nContact\nContact information\nYour name\nRyan Hell\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 2 of 4\nEmail address\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nPhone number\n+12677772344\nAddress\n11015 10th Ave sw\n-\nSeattle, Washington 98144\nAre you now or have ever been an active duty service member?\nNo\nPrimary concern\nWhat is your primary reason for contacting the Civil Rights Division?\nSomething else happened\nLocation\nWhere did this happen?\nOrganization name\n7599 Colockum Road\nAddress\n-\n-\nMalaga, Washington\nPersonal characteristics\nDo you believe any of these personal characteristics influenced why you were treated this\nway?\nDisability (including temporary or recovered and including HIV and drug addiction)\nReligion\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 3 of 4\nOther reason\nDate\nWhen did this happen?\n7/4/2024\nPersonal description\nIn your own words, describe what happened\nOn July 4, 2024, I, Ryan Hell, and my disabled friend (Type 1 diabetic with a brain tumor) were\nstranded in Chelan County, WA, after a flat tire on Colockum Rd. I called 911 for her diabetic\nshock. The dispatcher refused an ambulance, hung up, and rudely insisted a city councilman and\nmechanic take us to a ranch house (7599 Colockum Rd), promising medical help. No ambulance\narrived. At the ranch, we were separated. I was beaten, struck in the head, and extorted for $1,000\ncash by off-duty dispatchers, who threatened to kill me. Video evidence at the courthouse shows\none dispatcher threatening to \u201cbeat my ass\u201d for refusing to pay for \u201csaving\u201d my friend\u2019s life, de-\nspite no medical aid. They tried to provoke a fight, likely for a \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d setup. I re-\nfused to abandon my friend, a disabled diabetic, fearing they\u2019d kill her and frame me. The police\nreport (Incident 24C06401) notes a dispatcher\u2019s sheriff deputy accomplice saying I needed to\n\u201cdisappear for good.\u201d Former Seattle City Councilwoman Sally Bagshaw fled the scene off-road,\nnearly hitting me, as voices yelled, \u201cGo now, police can\u2019t see you!\u201d I posted photos of this on Twit-\nter/Facebook. The tow truck driver, on video, denied any bill or impound, yet I was arrested for\nfelony harassment (RCW 9A.46.020.2bii) based on a fabricated dispute. My lawyers have\nstonewalled or resigned; evidence may vanish. I\u2019m now gang-stalked by violent groups on my usu-\nal paths, fearing for my life as a whistleblower. Washington\u2019s FBI, law firms, and ACLU refuse to\nact. My DOJ complaint (612685-QZC) was rejected for \u201cinsufficient details\u201d despite a 500-charac-\nter form limit. Investigate this conspiracy, civil rights violations, and ongoing stalking. Contact me\nfor evidence.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ 5/28/25, 1:52 AM\nPage 4 of 4\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/CivilRightsIntakeDoJ.pdf", "filename": "CivilRightsIntakeDoJ.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.847659", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nTotal Number of Redactions in Document: 1\nRedaction Reasons by Page\nPage Reason Description Occurrences\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security\nnumbers credit card numbers or bank or\nother financial account numbers except\nwhen disclosure is expressly required by\nor governed by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\nPersonal chapter. \u201cOther financial account\n1 1\nInformation numbers\u201d applies to information such as\nsocial security numbers (as defined in\nRCW 9.35.005). Specific investigative\nrecords compiled by law enforcement\nagencies the nondisclosure is essential for\nthe protection of any person\u2019s right to\nprivacy. Disclosure of social security\nnumbers would be highly offensive to a\nreasonable person and is not of legitimate\nconcern to the public.\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nRedaction Reasons by Exemption\nPages\nReason Description\n(Count)\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security numbers\ncredit card numbers or bank or other\nfinancial account numbers except when\ndisclosure is expressly required by or\ngoverned by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\n1(1)\nPersonal Information chapter. \u201cOther financial account numbers\u201d\napplies to information such as social\nsecurity numbers (as defined in RCW\n9.35.005). Specific investigative records\ncompiled by law enforcement agencies the\nnondisclosure is essential for the protection\nof any person\u2019s right to privacy. Disclosure\nof social security numbers would be highly\noffensive to a reasonable person and is not\nof legitimate concern to the public.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/cad.pdf", "filename": "cad.pdf", "size_mb": 0.21, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.948660", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the above listed\nen\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve status.\nFailure to file the necessary report by 02/28/2025 will result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or termina\u0000on of your\nregistra\u0000on.\nPlease verify the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email address and update as needed.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corps\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/delinquencyNoticeSecStateWa.pdf", "filename": "delinquencyNoticeSecStateWa.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.479666", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Find related posts... Powered by Algolia Log in Create account\nShoubhit Dash\nShoubhit Dash\nPosted on Aug 11, 2022 \u2022 Updated on Mar 28, 2023\n81\nFollow\n65 16\nAdd\nreaction\nBuild a full stack app with Hi, I'm Shoubhit.", "body": "Find related posts... Powered by Algolia Log in Create account\nShoubhit Dash\nShoubhit Dash\nPosted on Aug 11, 2022 \u2022 Updated on Mar 28, 2023\n81\nFollow\n65 16\nAdd\nreaction\nBuild a full stack app with Hi, I'm Shoubhit. I'm a 17 y/o self-taught\ndeveloper and I like to build cool stuff.\n20\nJump to\ncreate-t3-app JOINED\nComments\nMar 11, 2022\n67\n#webdev #nextjs #tutorial\nSave\nMore from Shoubhit Dash\nThis blog post is outdated. I no longer have time to keep updating this post.\nWhy I Switched From Neovim to VSCode\nHey there! Today we'll be building an application with the T3 stack. We're going #webdev #programming #vscode #vim\nto build a Guestbook inspired by Lee Robinson's Guestbook. Let's get right into\nImplementing the Pipe Operator in\nit!\nTypeScript\n#typescript #functional #programming #tutorial\nGetting Started\nLet's set up a starter project with create-t3-app ! Typesafe Database Queries on the Edge\n#typescript #sql #webdev\nnpm create t3-app@latest\nAxiom PROMOTED\nWe're going to utilize all parts of the stack.\n?Whatwillyourprojectbecalled?guestbook\n?WillyoubeusingJavaScriptorTypeScript?TypeScript\nGoodchoice!UsingTypeScript!\n?Whichpackageswouldyouliketoenable?nextAuth,prisma,tailwind,trpc\n?Initializeanewgitrepository?Yes\nNiceone!Initializingrepository!\nSampling is an anti-pattern\n?Wouldyoulikeustorunppminstall?Yes\npromoted by Big\nAlright.We'llinstallthedependenciesforyou!\nObservability\nUsing:pnpm\nEasy. Understandable. Affordable. Log it all.\nLet's also set up a Postgres database on Railway. Railway makes it super simple\nLog it now.\nto quickly set up a database.\nLog it with Axiom\nGo to Railway and log in with GitHub if you haven't already. Now click on\nNew\n.\nProject\nNow provision Postgres.\nIt's as simple as that. Copy the connection string from the tab.\nConnect\nLet's start coding! Open the project in your favourite code editor.\nThere are a lot of folders but don't be overwhelmed. Here's a basic overview.\n- The schema.\nprisma/* prisma\n- Static assets including fonts and images.\npublic/*\n- Validation for environment variables.\nsrc/env/*\n- All the pages of the website.\nsrc/pages/*\n- The backend, which includes a tRPC server, Prisma client,\nsrc/server/*\nand auth utility.\n- Global CSS files, but we're going to be using Tailwind CSS\nsrc/styles/*\nfor most of our styles.\n- Next Auth type declarations.\nsrc/types/*\n- Utility functions.\nsrc/utils/*\nDuplicate the file and rename the new copy as . Open the\n.env.example .env\nfile and paste the connection string in .\n.env DATABASE_URL\nYou'll notice we have Discord OAuth set up using , so we also need a\nnext-auth\nand . Let's set that up.\nDISCORD_CLIENT_ID DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET\nSetting up authentication\nGo to the Discord Developers Portal and create a new application.\nGo to and add all of the callback URLs to . For\nOAuth2/General Redirects\nlocalhost the callback URL is\n. I also added the\nhttp://localhost:3000/api/auth/callback/discord\nproduction URL ahead of time.\nCopy the client ID and secret and paste both of them into .\n.env\nUncomment and set it as some random string too. Now we\nNEXTAUTH_SECRET\nhave all of our environment variables configured.\nLet's also change the database to and uncomment the\npostgresql @db.Text\nannotations in the model in . All the models you\nAccount prisma/schema.prisma\nsee in the schema are necessary for Next Auth to work.\nLet's push this schema to our Railway Postgres database. This command will\npush our schema to Railway and generate type definitions for the Prisma client.\nnpx prisma db push\nNow run the dev server.\nnpm run dev\nGo to the file and delete all the code, let's just render a\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\nheading.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst Home = () => {\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nI can't look at light themes, so lets apply some global styles in\nto make this app dark theme.\nsrc/styles/globals.css\n/* src/styles/globals.css */\n@tailwind base;\n@tailwind components;\n@tailwind utilities;\nbody {\n@apply bg-neutral-900 text-neutral-100;\n}\nMuch better.\nIf you look at , you can see we have\nsrc/pages/api/auth/[...nextauth].ts\nDiscord OAuth already set up using Next Auth. Here is where you can add more\nOAuth providers like Google, Twitter, etc.\nNow let's create a button to let users login with Discord. We can use the\nfunction from Next Auth.\nsignIn()\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nWe can use the hook to get the session for the user. While we're\nuseSession()\nat it, we can also use the function to implement log out functionality.\nsignOut()\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn, signOut, useSession } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nif (status === \"loading\") {\nreturn
Loading...
;\n}\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nGIF\nGreat! We now have auth working. Next Auth really makes it stupidly simple.\nBackend\nLet's work on the backend now. We'll be using tRPC for our API layer and\nPrisma for connecting and querying our database.\nWe're going to have to modify our prisma schema and add a model.\nGuestbook\nEach message in the guestbook will have a name and a message. Here's how\nthe model will look like.\nmodel Guestbook {\nid String @id @default(cuid())\ncreatedAt DateTime @default(now())\nname String\nmessage String @db.VarChar(100)\n}\nLet's push this modified schema to our Railway Postgres database.\nnpx prisma db push\nNow let's get to the fun part - it's tRPC time. Go ahead and delete the\nfile in folder. Then in the same folder,\nexample.ts src/server/api/routers\ncreate a new file called .\nguestbook.ts\nFirst, we're going to define a mutation to post messages to our database.\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, publicProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\npostMessage: publicProcedure\n.input(\nz.object({\nname: z.string(),\nmessage: z.string(),\n})\n)\n.mutation(async ({ ctx, input }) => {\ntry {\nawait ctx.prisma.guestbook.create({\ndata: {\nname: input.name,\nmessage: input.message,\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(error);\n}\n}),\n});\nHere we have a tRPC mutation that uses zod to validate the input and has an\nasync function that runs a single prisma query to create a new row in the\ntable.\nGuestbook\nWorking with Prisma is an absolutely wonderful example. The autocomplete and\ntypesafety is amazing.\nWe also want this mutation to be protected. Here we can use tRPC\nmiddlewares.\nIf you take a look at the file, we're using\nsrc/server/auth.ts\nfrom Next Auth that gives us access to the session\nunstable_getServerSession\non the server.\n// src/server/auth.ts\nimport { type GetServerSidePropsContext } from \"next\";\nimport { unstable_getServerSession } from \"next-auth\";\nimport { authOptions } from \"../pages/api/auth/[...nextauth]\";\nexport const getServerAuthSession = async (ctx: {\nreq: GetServerSidePropsContext[\"req\"];\nres: GetServerSidePropsContext[\"res\"];\n}) => {\nreturn await unstable_getServerSession(ctx.req, ctx.res, authOptions);\n};\nWe're passing that session into our tRPC context.\n// src/server/api/trpc.ts\nexport const createTRPCContext = async (opts: CreateNextContextOptions) => {\nconst { req, res } = opts;\nconst session = await getServerAuthSession({ req, res });\nreturn createInnerTRPCContext({\nsession,\n});\n};\nThen, we can use this session to make our mutation protected using a\n.\nprotectedProcedure\n// src/server/api/trpc.ts\nconst enforceUserIsAuthed = t.middleware(({ ctx, next }) => {\nif (!ctx.session || !ctx.session.user) {\nthrow new TRPCError({ code: \"UNAUTHORIZED\" });\n}\nreturn next({\nctx: {\nsession: { ...ctx.session, user: ctx.session.user },\n},\n});\n});\nexport const protectedProcedure = t.procedure.use(enforceUserIsAuthed);\nNow, replace with to make our mutation\npublicProcedure protectedProcedure\nprotected from unauthenticated users.\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, protectedProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\npostMessage: protectedProcedure\n.input(\nz.object({\nname: z.string(),\nmessage: z.string(),\n})\n)\n.mutation(async ({ ctx, input }) => {\ntry {\nawait ctx.prisma.guestbook.create({\ndata: {\nname: input.name,\nmessage: input.message,\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(error);\n}\n}),\n});\nNext, let's write a query to get all messages in the guestbook. We want all\nguests to see the messages so we'll use the for this.\npublicProcedure\n// src/server/api/routers/guestbook.ts\nimport { z } from \"zod\";\nimport { createTRPCRouter, protectedProcedure, publicProcedure } from \"../trpc\";\nexport const guestbookRouter = createTRPCRouter({\ngetAll: publicProcedure.query(async ({ ctx }) => {\ntry {\nreturn await ctx.prisma.guestbook.findMany({\nselect: {\nname: true,\nmessage: true,\n},\norderBy: {\ncreatedAt: \"desc\",\n},\n});\n} catch (error) {\nconsole.log(\"error\", error);\n}\n}),\n//...\nHere we are getting just the name and message from all the rows from the\nmodel. The rows are sorted in descending order by the\nGuestbook createdAt\nfield.\nNow merge this router in the main .\nappRouter\n// src/server/api/root.ts\nimport { createTRPCRouter } from \"./trpc\";\nimport { guestbookRouter } from \"./routers/guestbook\";\nexport const appRouter = createTRPCRouter({\nguestbook: guestbookRouter,\n});\n// export type definition of API\nexport type AppRouter = typeof appRouter;\nWe're pretty much done on the backend part. Let's work on the UI next.\nFrontend\nLet's first center everything.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { signIn, signOut, useSession } from \"next-auth/react\";\nconst Home = () => {\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nif (status === \"loading\") {\nreturn
Loading...
;\n}\nreturn (\n
\n

Guestbook

\n

\nTutorial for create-t3-app\n

\n
\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n
\n
\n);\n};\nexport default Home;\nI also made the heading bigger and added some padding between the\nelements.\nLet's use our tRPC query to get all the messages for the guestbook in the\ndatabase. But we don't have any data right now. We can use Prisma Studio to\nadd some data manually.\nnpx prisma studio\nIt will automatically open on . Go to the table\nhttp://localhost:5555 Guestbook\nand add a bunch of records like this.\nGIF\nNow that we have data, we can use the query and display the data. For this we\ncan use the tRPC wrapper. Let's create a component for this in\nreact-query\n.\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nimport { api } from \"../utils/api\";\nconst GuestbookEntries = () => {\nconst { data: guestbookEntries, isLoading } = api.guestbook.getAll.useQuery();\nif (isLoading) return
Fetching messages...
;\nreturn (\n
\n{guestbookEntries?.map((entry, index) => {\nreturn (\n
\n

{entry.message}

\n- {entry.name}\n
\n);\n})}\n
\n);\n};\nHere we're using and mapping over the array it returns.\nuseQuery()\nOf course here too we have wonderful typesafety and autocomplete.\nNow render this component in the component.\nHome\n// src/pages/index.tsx\n
\n

Guestbook

\n

\nTutorial for create-t3-app\n

\n
\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\nLet's now create a form component in and use our tRPC\nsrc/pages/index.tsx\nmutation there.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst Form = () => {\nconst [message, setMessage] = useState(\"\");\nconst { data: session, status } = useSession();\nconst postMessage = api.guestbook.postMessage.useMutation();\nif (status !== \"authenticated\") return null;\nreturn (\n {\nevent.preventDefault();\npostMessage.mutate({\nname: session.user?.name as string,\nmessage,\n});\nsetMessage(\"\");\n}}\n>\n setMessage(event.target.value)}\n/>\n\nSubmit\n\n\n);\n};\nWe can now render the in the component and add some padding.\nForm Home\n// src/pages/index.tsx\n
\n{session ? (\n<>\n

hi {session.user?.name}

\n {\nsignOut().catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogout\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n) : (\n {\nsignIn(\"discord\").catch(console.log);\n}}\n>\nLogin with Discord\n\n)}\n
\n\n
\n
\nHere we have a form and we're using to post the data to the\nuseMutation()\ndatabase. But you'll notice one problem here. When we click on the submit\nbutton, it does post the message to the database, but the user doesn't get any\nimmediate feedback. Only on refreshing the page, the user can see the new\nmessage.\nFor this we can use optimistic UI updates! makes this trivial to do.\nreact-query\nWe just need to add some stuff to our hook inside the\nuseMutation() Form\ncomponent.\n// src/pages/index.tsx\nconst utils = api.useContext();\nconst postMessage = api.guestbook.postMessage.useMutation({\nonMutate: async (newEntry) => {\nawait utils.guestbook.getAll.cancel();\nutils.guestbook.getAll.setData(undefined, (prevEntries) => {\nif (prevEntries) {\nreturn [newEntry, ...prevEntries];\n} else {\nreturn [newEntry];\n}\n});\n},\nonSettled: async () => {\nawait utils.guestbook.getAll.invalidate();\n},\n});\nIf you want to learn more about this code example, you can read about\noptimistic updates with here.\n@tanstack/react-query\nWe're pretty much done with the coding part! That was pretty simple wasn't it.\nThe T3 stack makes it super easy and quick to build full stack web apps. Let's\nnow deploy our guestbook.\nDeployment\nWe're going to use Vercel to deploy. Vercel makes it really easy to deploy\nNextJS apps, they are the people who made NextJS.\nFirst, push your code to a GitHub repository. Now, go to Vercel and sign up with\nGitHub if you haven't already.\nThen click on and import your newly created repository.\nNew Project\nNow we need to add environment variables, so copy paste all the environment\nvariables to Vercel. After you've done that, click .\nDeploy\nAdd a custom domain if you have one and you're done! Congratulations!\nAll the code can be found here. You can visit the website at guestbook.nxl.sh.\nCredits\nAyanava Karmakar for updating the blog using tRPC v10.\nJulius Marminge and Michael Lee for reviewing the updated blog.\nLee Robinson for the idea of a guestbook.\nAnthony for giving constructive criticism.\nJAR and Krish for proof reading.\nHakan G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc for updating the project files in accordance with the latest\ntemplate (7.3.0).\ncreate-t3-app\nBefore you go\nDo your career a big favor. Join DEV. (The website you're on right now)\nIt takes one minute, it's free, and is worth it for your career.\nGet started\nCommunity matters\nTop comments (20)\nSubscribe\nThe discussion has been locked. New comments can't be added.\nBlog post is outdated\nJoel Almeida \u2022 Sep 11 '22\nThanks a lot for this tutorial! It's very helpful. One thing I would add that I got\nstuck on for a little bit is that you have to run after creating\nprisma generate\nyour schema before you can access the prisma client.\n3 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nYou're welcome!\nautomatically runs for you. Weird it didn't\nprisma db push prisma generate\nwork for you.\n1 like\nLike\nJoel Almeida \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nThat is really strange! I had run , I could see everything\nprisma db push\non railway no problem, but the client didn't work until I also ran\nprisma\n, so yeah, no idea what that's about\ngenerate\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 12 '22\nGlad you got it working!\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Hayes \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nI appreciate the work put in, but to anyone visiting this after March 2023 you\nwill have a hard time following along with this as the folder structures have\nchanged considerably in create-t3-app.\nIt would be really good if you could release an updated version, as this is the\npretty much the first tutorial that pops up in google when you look for a\n(written) t3 tutorial.\nThe big issue is Typescript errors with the return types from your queries. If\nyou follow along to the letter of this tutorial you will be hit by so many red\nlines!\nJust leaving this here for future readers....\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nHey! I know ct3a has changed a lot since this blog post, but with college\napplications and entrance exams right around the corner, I don't have a lot\nof time to keep updating this post and usually rely on the community to\nmake a PR on my website's repo. From there I also update the content on\ndev.to. If you are free enough to update stuff that is broken, feel free to\nmake a PR on my website's repo and I'll update the content here as well.\nThe code is in this repository.\nSorry for not keeping this updated!\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 24 '23\nAlso have you tried restarting the eslint and typescript servers? Many\npeople seem to be facing that issue.\n1 like\nLike\nNecmettin Sarg\u0131n \u2022 Mar 4 '23\nI don't have any knowledge on backend but don't we use something like\nnode/express for backend? Which one does backend work?\n3 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Mar 4 '23\nYeah express is a backend library. Next.js on the other hand is a full stack\nframework, it provides a backend framework as well as a frontend\nframework with routing. Note that Next.js's backend is based on Node\nexcept their edge API routes which have a subset of node features.\n2 likes\nLike\nGedalyaBlau \u2022 Sep 20 '22\nthank you\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Sep 21 '22\nyou're welcome\n1 like\nLike\nRobert Davidson \u2022 Nov 7 '22\nJust finished this tutorial, it was great and lead me on many rabbit holes to\nbetter understand the tech in this stack. Thanks for making it easy to follow!\n2 likes\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Nov 7 '22\nYou're welcome!\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Valladares \u2022 Oct 7 '22\nAwesome job @nexxeln\n1 like\nLike\nCasey Siebel \u2022 Oct 27 '22 \u2022 Edited on Oct 27\nThanks for doing this tutorial and for your work on CTA! I'm really interested in\nthese technologies!! I know versions change often but it's rather frustrating\nthat the code show in this article is different from the code linked in your\ngithub repo. It make's it difficult / impossible to follow along. Especially if I\ndon't know what package versions you were using in this article write up.\nI'd love to see a tutorial that shows how to use next-auth with credential sign\nup and login, in the T3 stack, using cookies and without using JWTTheo talks\nabout it here but I'm having some trouble getting it all wired up:\nyoutube.com/watch?v=h6wBYWWdyYQ\nThanks again!\n1 like\nLike\nAuthor\nShoubhit Dash \u2022 Oct 27 '22\nThis post will be updated soon to trpc v10. As of next-auth credential auth,\nI wouldn't recommend using it.\n1 like\nLike\nChristian Angelo M Sulit \u2022 Feb 1 '23\nDocker build failing due to env validation.\nSKIP_ENV_VALIDATION=1 doesn't work.\nLike\nhex-paradus \u2022 Mar 28 '23\nI am unable to login to your deployed version with Discord. And I am getting\nthe same error in a personal project of mine. Do you know why that is\nhappening?\n1 like\nLike\nharshmakwana21 \u2022 Feb 14 '23 \u2022 Edited on Feb 14\nWhy am I getting type error on ctx.prisma.guestbook.create ?\n1 like\nLike\nPaul Hayes \u2022 Mar 21 '23\nNot sure but I have the exact same errors...\n1 like\nLike\nView full discussion (20 comments)\nCode of Conduct \u2022 Report abuse\nAuth0 PROMOTED\nReady, set, deploy!\nWith Auth0 and Vercel, your app goes from zero to hero in record time.\nLearn more\nRead next\nFinding Work as a Self-Taught Web Developer in 2024\nNurudeen Amedu - Jul 28\nHow to create a ribbon for a pricing card with Tailwind CSS\nMichael Andreuzza - Aug 2\nUnderstanding optimistic UI and React\u2019s useOptimistic Hook\nMegan Lee - Aug 20\nReal Time Booking App\nPrince Jain - Jul 28\nThank you to our Diamond Sponsor Neon for supporting our community.\nDEV Community \u2014 A constructive and inclusive social network for software developers. With you every step of your journey.\nHome DEV++ Podcasts Videos Tags DEV Help Forem Shop Advertise on DEV DEV Challenges DEV Showcase About Contact Guides Software comparisons\nCode of Conduct Privacy Policy Terms of use\nBuilt on Forem \u2014 the open source software that powers DEV and other inclusive communities.\nMade with love and Ruby on Rails. DEV Community \u00a9 2016 - 2024.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Build a full stack app with create-t3-app - DEV Community.pdf", "filename": "email_Build a full stack app with create-t3-app - DEV Community.pdf", "size_mb": 1.54, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.343653", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Ryan Hell", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...", "body": "Gmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nDEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE AND DEFENSE REQUESTED\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 6:56 PM\nTo: Ryan Hell , Jacika Akter \nIT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION,\nby way of recent revelations, discovery of persons. and provided documents (I.E. archives and history), that there are\nmultiple STATE AND CITY court officials who are definitively classifiable as \"bad actors\u201d.\nThese bad actors were criminally engaged in some type of nefarious , and ILLEGAL activity in order to :\n1. circumvent justice,\n2. inhibit free speech and,\n3. manipulate election outcomes. t\nNamely, they kidnapped and extorted me for no reason of my own.\nThey later fabricated an allegation portraying themselves as good samaritans attacked by myself alleged to have\nmade some sort of verbal threats.\nThe act of kidnapping was present based on theelement of duress by myself and my aging, disabled, diabetic\npassenger whom they separated me from and denied either party contact... for whom I called begging for ambulatory\nservices after a harrowing 2 day ordeal attempting to get our vehicle out of a canyon after having two suspiciously\ncaused flat tires.\nWe desperately depended on THE EMS 911 EMERGENCY MEDICAL ATTENTION AND THEY USED THAT premise\nas an opportunity to FORCE us into their PERSONAL vehicle and to their RESIDENCE. This residence was outside of\ncell service and away from the hospitals.. and we never did get ANY sort of medical attention for my passenger.\nUltimately they eventually sent her in my truck over to Seattle, after handing her the keys to my truck. The truck broke\ndown half way and had to be towed and required an expensive TRANSMISSION REPLACEMENT.\nIn fact the merits of this case will support evidence that these officials were attempting to commit something akin to\nwitness elimination.\nAdditionally, although more fit for the jury to interpret, perhaps; the tow driver UNLAWFULLY moved my vehicle by\ndriving it. I gave explicit directions to dispatch as well as the homeowners / off duty dispatchers that NOBODY is to\ntouch my vehicle without my presence.\nAs if the classic hisar robbery scheme is not clear enough; TOW TRUCK OPERATOR who had been\nDEMANDING my vehicle or \u201c1,000 dollars in US CASH BILLS ONLY\u201d; had surrendered my keys to the OFF DUTY\ndispatcher / homeowner after I carefully and calmly reminded him that he is required under statute to gain MY\nauthorization to touch that vehicle and has now stolen it, This seemed to stop his persuit, and after some abusive\nname calling to me, and trying tp FALSELY identify himself as a good samaritan , he violently yelled at the\nhomeowner and threw my keys claiming he was no longer interested in the truck or me. As I turned to\nJermiah and politely asked for my keys, he said \u201cYou aint getting your truck punk\u201d. I realizes at this point I\nwas now a victim of robber as well, as physical force began to be thrown at me as Jeremiah was increasingly\nfrustrated as he seemed to be losing control of his accomplices and the planned scheme seemed to spiral. I\ndecided to focus om a foot escape with my passenger, and then contact a agency such as State Patrol\nintervene with this lawless contempt pf public trust.\nBACK STORY / MOTIVE BEHIND SALLY BAGSHAW STALKING AND ATTEMPTING TO MURDER ME:\nI have long been a Ed Murray opponent and one of the harshest social media broadcasters, whilst the next party I will\nhighlight has been publicly passionate about protecting and hiding the crimes committed by Ed Murray causing his\nvoluntary resignation. IN 2017, MY WIFE, A TENURED FEDERAL OFFICER WAS ROBBED AT GUNPOINT, in a\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:23 PM\nGmail - DEFENDENDENT RYAN HELL, CHANGE OF VENUE A... https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ndaring and unusually brazen public crime committed in 2017 on Pacific Hiway. This happed shortly after Ihelped the\nSeattle Times identify posible locations of sealed records concerning sexual offenses\u2026EUGENE OREGON\u2026 which\nultimately yielded a swift discovery and rapid successive voluntary resignation by Murray soon after. Keep in mind one\nof his accuser mysteriously died just days prior to, of am alleged overdose.\nFurther, the incident most concerning, has involved a very carefully planned and executed plot to stage a fake murder\nsuicide, thus carry out a premeditated murder . I will present that evidence when called upon to do so.\nSOLVED: FLEEING ACCOMPLICE OF THE HOMEOWNERS\nThere was a female driving a red pickup who was frantically fleeing the scene there.. She yelled something to the\neffect of \u201cI don\u2019t want him to see me\u201d and the men yelled to her \u201cjust go! Hurry the cops are almost hear\u201d.\nNEAR FATAL FALSE ARREST WITHOUT JUSTIFIED USE OF FORCE\nThe arrest itself was extremely dramatic and it was clear to me they were called upon to MURDER ME, again, for\nwitness elimination. I can substantiate this at the very least, by way of highlighting the verbiage in the dialogue\nbetween dispatchers and homeowners. Arresting officers were personal acquaintances of Jeremiah according to\nJustin Titius, appointed counsel. This alone is extremely unsettling and I do thank the officers for their last minute\nhesitation after intiially contacting me violently and accusing me of possessing a firearm.\nAS ALWAYS I REMAINED CALM AND COOPERATIVE, COMPLYING WITH ALL DIRECTIVES.\nI was able to capture multiple photos and I have just nowdiscoverd that the woman was none other than Seattle CITY\nCouncil Woman, and former 8 year tenure under ( N Maleng) SENIOR prosecutor, and more\u2026..SALLY BAGSHAW.\nI have compiled a number of montages and presented them to federal analyst to assess and it has been universal\nconsensus that the woman fleeing the Wenatchee address of my ALLEGED crimes, was in fact, SALLY BAGSHAW.\nFURTHER:\nYour court stenographer, WAS ALSO PRESENT AND WAS INTRODUCED TO ME AS ONE OF THE\nDFEFENDENTS MOTHERS. I was shocked to come to court and see her uniquely unforgettable appearance and\nstartled to see her visibly become uneasy and attempt to hide her face as I simply sat in the court room. With not\ndoubt this woman. Is the defendants CLAIMED mother.\nI have tried multiple times to present this to two judges and JUSTIN TITUS, my counsel assigned, has urged me\nnot to due to the likelihood I would be arrested for contempt.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:23 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_decleration-RealizationofConspiracyFeb-5-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_decleration-RealizationofConspiracyFeb-5-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.959648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:44 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700751\nActive Call Nature ATL/ATC Type l Priority 3\nAddress X:-120.206876, Y:47.238104 City\nCalls Dupl Names w/Alrts Wants Prem Adr\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections\nComplainant\nNumber UTO\nLast UNABLE TO OBTAIN Fst Mid\nAddress DOB / /\nCity ST ZIP SSN - -\nPhone ( ) - Race Sex Prev Calls 99 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert\nContact\nContact RYAN HELL 070978 Telephone (267)777-2344\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received 9 911 Line Occurred between 13:13:28 07/04/24\nReceived By MCCURDY KALAH and 13:20:00 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 13:13:28 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06391 07/04/24 ATL/ATC *Initiating Call\nNM UTO / / UNABLE TO OBTAIN, *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n13:18:33 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP AND GIRLFRIEND WERE REROUTED ON GOOGLE MAPS THROUGH THE CLOCKUM BECAUSE OF A\nDETOUR. THEY ENDED UP GET A FLAT TIRE.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:44 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700751\nActive Call Nature ATL/ATC Type l Priority 3\nAddress X:-120.206876, Y:47.238104 City\nCalls Dupl Names w/Alrts Wants Prem Adr\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections\nComplainant\nNumber UTO\nLast UNABLE TO OBTAIN Fst Mid\nAddress DOB / /\nCity ST ZIP SSN - -\nPhone ( ) - Race Sex Prev Calls 99 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert\nContact\nContact RYAN HELL 070978 Telephone (267)777-2344\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received 9 911 Line Occurred between 13:13:28 07/04/24\nReceived By MCCURDY KALAH and 13:20:00 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 13:13:28 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06391 07/04/24 ATL/ATC *Initiating Call\nNM UTO / / UNABLE TO OBTAIN, *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n13:18:33 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP AND GIRLFRIEND WERE REROUTED ON GOOGLE MAPS THROUGH THE CLOCKUM BECAUSE OF A\nDETOUR. THEY ENDED UP GET A FLAT TIRE. THEY HAVE BEEN STRANDED SINCE 2300HRS\nLAST NIGHT. NO FOOD OR WATER. THEY'RE DEHYDRATED. RP FELT LIKE HE WAS GONNA HAVE\nA STROKE EARLIER BUT HE IS FEELING BETTER. GIRLFRIEND IS A DIABETIC AND DOESNT\nHAVE HER MEDS. RP HAD DRIVEN 20 MILES ON HIS RIM IN HIS BLK FORD F150 AND IS NOW\nSTUCK AND UNABLE TO GET OUT.\n13:19:08 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP WAS TX'D TO KITTITAS CO WHO WAS TOLD TO CALL RCOM\n13:19:22 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRP IS UPSET AND SAID HE KEEPS GETTING TRANSFERRED PLACES AND HE'S WORRIED\nTHEY'RE GOING TO DIE\n13:27:06 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nPHONE IS AT 33 PERCENT BUT HE HAS A CHARGER. SAID HES GONNA TRY TO GET ON HIS\nBICYCLE AND RIDE IT INTO TOWN TO GET WATER FOR HIM AND HIS GIRLFRIEND. THEY ARE\nSO DEHYDRATED THEY CAN'T STAY THERE ANYMORE. THE GIRLFRIEND IS GOING TO STAY AT\nLOC WHILE HE RIDES THE BIKE.\n13:27:30 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nPER K16 DOES HE JUST NEED A TOW TRK? MY PHONE IS UNAVAILABLE DOWNLOADING\nANOTHER CASE\n13:28:47 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nYES TOW TRUCK\n13:28:53 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nNO AID NEEDED\n13:29:15 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nFEMALE IS DELIRIOUS AND POSSIBLY GETTING A HEAT STROKE. RP IS SCARED SHE IS\nGOING TO GO INTO DIABETIC SHOCK. BUT DOESN'T NEED AID YET.\n13:41:38 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nMTN HWY TOWING ENRT TO GET THEM. THEY WILL PUT TOGETHER A PLAN AND CALL RCOM\nBACK BUT THEY WILL GO GET THEM. THEY WERE PROVIDED DIRECTIONS. RCOM UPDATED THE\nRP AND THEY REQUESTED WE CALL MTN HWY TOWING AND ASK THEM TO BRING THEM WATER.\nWILL CALL MTN HWY TOWING BACK TO ASK.\n13:41:53 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\n2007 2WD SINGLE CAB FORD F150\n13:43:14 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nMTN HWY TOWING WILL BRING THEM WATER AND CANDY BAR\n13:59:37 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 UPDATED WILL GET HIS AID BAG AND HEAD THERE. WILL UPDATE VIA RADIO ON CCSO\nFREQ OR CALL RCOM W/ AN UPDATE.\n14:13:21 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 IS GOING TO THEIR LOC W/ ONG JUICE, WATER, AID BAG, ETC AND WILL BRING THEM\nTO HIS HOUSE. MTN HWY IS GETTING WHEELS AND TIRES TO RETRIEVE THE PICK UP AND\nBRING IT DOWN TO RC58'S HOUSE.\n14:20:12 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 REQ TO CALL RP BACK TO ADV OF 20 MINUTE ETA IN A BLU GMC PICK UP. CALLED\nTHE RP WHO ADVISED HE ALSO HAS 2 DOGS AND WANTED TO KNOW IF THEY COULD GO TOO.\nTRIED TO CALL RC58 WHO DIDN'T ANSWER.\n14:43:06 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 IS W/ THEM AND WILL LOAD THEM UP AND TAKE THEM BACK TO HIS HOUSE.\n14:44:25 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRC58 HAVE SUBJECTS AND TAKING THEM TO 7599 CLOCKUM\n16:15:17 07/04/2024 - MCCURDY KALAH\nRC58 NO MEDICAL ISSUES AND MTN HWY IS WORKING ON GETTING THE TRUCK OUT. RCOM CAN\nCLR THE CALL.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/24C06391.pdf", "filename": "24C06391.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.907660", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "heriberto@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 3:43 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nTitus-\nI never got a call I figured you must be extremely busy.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 3:43 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nTitus-\nI never got a call I figured you must be extremely busy. Can we try to get a short call to go over this case this week\nplease? I am in seattle, same address. I guess you said you were not aware of that. I was told I could do video\nhearings until told otherwise. I will call the clerk and try to get it set up from my end, but please let me know asap if\nthere is anything I need to worry about, like being in the cross hairs of a pissed off judge for not driving over to\nwenatchee to attend this hearing. I was honestly told that provided I made one appearance, I would be allowed to do\nvideo court until otherwise stated. I have limited funds and transportation due to the state of damages the tow\ncompany caused on my vehicle while driving it (yes they actually did not TOW my vehicle, they drove it without\nauthorization after I explicitly instructed dispatch as well as Jeremiah that nobody was to touch my vehicle without\nauthorization or without me there.)\nAnyhow, I appreciate your help man. Sorry if I sound frantic but this is a serious thing for a guy like me. And I was\nabsolutely screwed and setup to lock heads by a crooked dispatch center and some unscrupulous folks in the canyon\nthere. I would like to know what my way out is and if I agree to not press charges or sue anyone if they will drop their\nbogus alligation. Not a snowball chance in hell I committed ANY crime, and the trail of really brazen and idiotic actions\non their part is going to be pretty obvious even if they all wear badges and call themselves saints and heros or\nwhatever. Im sorry but these folks went to great lengths to STEAL from me and then they imprisoned the very person\nwhom I was calling for medical aid for. This wasnt about a tow dispute. It was never about that. They tried to make a\nbuck on that and I stepped around that and asked for my friend; who was being held in their garage. The actual\nthreats were made to me, by the female as well as Jeremiah. The tow truck driver had tried to get me to pay \"1,000\ncash\" and I eventually said \"you were never authorized to do anything to my vehicle. You have no legal right to just\ntake someones vehicle and perform a mock repair service then demand money or threaten to keep it. We can sort this\nout with a judge but I need my friend so we can leave\". Tow driver spit and swore and called me names trying to start\na fight. He turned to Jeremiah the homeowner and threw my keys to him and said \"I dont want nothing to do with this\npiece of shit\". I waited and stared at Jeremiah, who had some back and forth with tow operator who held his ground\nand persisted that he wanted nothing to do with my truck. I smiled and said \"now give me my keys so we can leave,\nplease\". Jeremiah was outraged and said exactly \"you aint getting your truck back.\" I said \"maybe not today, but we\ncan deal with that later then. So youre not giving me my truck back?\" Jeremiah simply answered \"fuck you. We tried to\nhelp you\". I said \"no, you tried to scam me. Thank god Im not stupid and know some law. Me and my friend will leave\non foot. I'm confident Ill be compensated nicely for my vehicle should it be damaged or disappear between now and\nthe time we get to state patrol where we are going for help.\". Jeremiah said \"you arent going anywhere.\" I said \"yes I\nam. And my friend is too.\" Jeremiah said \"shes with us, she is not leaving\". I asked to speak to her and they said no.\nAt this point I am starting to think things are so far from the normal peramiter, and well into serious felony conduct\nby city workers.... this is a recipe for me to end up dead. I was unable to call for help. I made 3 additional 911 calls\nwhich were all fielded by the same female dispatcher. I asked to speak with state patrol and she said she could not\npatch me through. She said she isnt an operator. I stated that I am facing a situation where I believe me and\nespecially my sick friend who needed aid, were facing loss of life if a nuetral third party leo cannot be brought on the\nline. Dispatch hung up on me. Jeremiah stated at about that time, that he had contacted his friend who is a Chelan\ndeputy. They were on the way. I asked for what? He said you threatened to shoot the place up. I laughed i thought he\nwas joking. Not something I would say. Not to mention I am not even mad at all throughout all of this. They were\nfuming pissed, not me.\nYou see; I made a standard call for emergency medical attention for a 60 year old type 2 diabetic who was going\ninto insulin shock. They instead drove us outside of cell service, seperated us then tried to extort me with my vehicle\nafter they STOLE it from where I parked it.\nFurther, Jeremiah's wife, who is also a dispatcher at Riverside EMS center with Jeremiah; she was the nastiest of\nthis group. All exhibited some seriously shady conduct but it is my observation thatboth Jeremiah as well as the tow\noperators; were pushed into this incident reluctently, by the female spouse, homeowner. She chastised tow operator\nwhen he relinquished my vehicle. She also had to repeatedly prod Jeremiah to follow thru. At the beginning of it as we\nsat in his garage thinking they were helping us.... she turned mean without reason; and left the room to yell at\n1 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nJermeiah. He came back with a change of clothes, he had donned fire fighter gear.... and she scolded him yet again\nand he went once more inside the house, this time he came out with a Wenatchee city shirt and hat on. And then the\nneighbor drove over to jeremiahs right next door, driving a red hummer which I recognize as a parade truck....and he\nhad the light bar on the entire time. I got video of that.\nThen the tow truck showed up and they were in a newer International roll back style tow truck, bright red color\ntruck; with signage which said \"BCR Towing, Cashmere\" or some 3 letter name I think, I need to check the pics for\nthat though. It definately was not Mountain Towing thiugh, seems like that discrepency in the police report should\nmatter though...\nAnyhow.... on the TOW TRUCK was a SxS ATV... great big thing like polaris RZr or something. A man was driving\nmy truck behind the tow truck as he pulled in. Jeremiah instructed me to go back in the garage but I came back out\nquickly and seen the tow truck was offloading the atv and the red parade HUMMER was now positioned sideways sort\nof blocking me...I told jeremiah that I never authoried any of this and I will pay for the help, but just like I told dispathc\non the intial call; I DONT HAVE MUCH MONEY.\nTow driver orders me to his truck and he sat inside and wouldnt make eye contact with me, I knew what was next. I\nasked \"how did you get my truck? He said \"we found the keys to it inside nd we bought a new tire and wheel for it.\nThen he said \"You owe me 1,000 dollars.\" CASH ONLY. I inspected the wheel and tire they provided. It was off of\nanother ford suv likely. The wheel was much smaller and a lot different. The tire was dry rotted. To make matters\nworse they drove my vehicle with one of the other tires completely flat also, destroying nother wheel nd tire.\nEventually when I was in jail, they simply handed the keys over to my friend and said head out. She broke down with\ntwo flats on snoqualmie pass. Luckilu. Upon being delivered to seattle by tow truck, the wheels they slapped on (mine)\nwere not even hand tightened, Lugs were missing. The clutch was completely shot and worse yet, the transmission\nhad catastrophic problem now too requiring a new transmission, all documented by tow and certified transmission\nshop.\nThese people prayed on me.These people endangered my friend multiple times in many ways. These people likely\nplotted to kill mewhen they realized they were not going to have an easy time with me as a target or mark for their\npathetic and SHAMEFUL scam.\nAs much as I want to move on; here we sit with this absurd case of a bunch of idiot hicks who tried to pull a shameful\nscam on stranded motorist amidst a medical emergency\nNO AMBULANCE WAS EVER CALLED\nNO EMT EVER TRIAGED MY FRIEND\nI imagine they will slice and dice this ten ways from sunday and try to totally bury me.... Im not mad though...honestly\nBecause I know I am not a vile POS who prayed on two disabled people who were calling for medical help after being\ntricked into a detour which LIKELY was carefully layed out by the same scumbags.\nJeremiah tried to have me killed by the arresting officer. And they were likely about to do it when I spasmed and\ncollapsed due to the severe agony and dehydration caused by frantially digging and pushing my truck out of 20+ miles\nof destert hard pan and shale rock, on a bare steel wheel under 90+ degree heat with no water and my trucks heat is\non full blast always and has been for years.\nThis isnt something I want to persue but you have some very very sick people who fucked up bad. I am pretty sure the\ncourts and all else must be complicit since the raw merits and evidence of this entire case point straight to my defense\nand its pretty obvious what has gone on out there. The fact this is dragging out to a court trial against ME is another\ncriminal matter entirely in and of itself. Seems the judge might not have seen much of this case yet or he would\nquickly throw it out. Because there enough evidence to criminally charge about a half dozen Cheland court personnel\nwho were present.\nI just want to move on. Not looking to sue anyone. Not looking for payback. This is a painful reminder that the\nauthorities are not our friends as citizens. And also scumbags will often call themselves \"good samaritans\" while\nextorting people. Eben while they are in need of emergency medical attention.\n-Ryan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:35 AM Beto Martinez wrote:\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:15 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_titus_noshow-phoneMeeting-sep22-2024.pdf", "filename": "email_titus_noshow-phoneMeeting-sep22-2024.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.548655", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nChecksum 4948024b8b2aac96c5e06a7d077592b0\nFilename AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_2729470\n9-2.mp4\nFilesize 605 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 Base Media v1 [IS0 14496-12:2003]\nMinorversion 0.2.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 iso2\n2 avc1\n3 mp41\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nModifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTimescale 1000\nDuration 1:13:18\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 1/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nPreviewduration 0 s\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTrackmodifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 1:13:18\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 704\nImageheight 480\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 704\nSourceimageheight 480\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nVideoframerate 14.985\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nMediamodifydate 0000:00:00 00:00:00\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 2/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nMediatimescale 24000\nMediaduration 1:13:18\nMedialanguagecode und\nHandlerdescription SoundHandler\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 24000\nHandlertype Metadata\nHandlervendorid Apple\nEncoder Lavf56.40.100\nMediadatasize 601756659\nMediadataoffset 3104114\nImagesize 704x480\nMegapixels 0.338\nAvgbitrate 1.09 Mbps\nRotation 0\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 3/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 704\nHeight 480\nCoded Width 704\nCoded Height 480\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 50\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 15000/1001\nAvg Frame Rate 484434143/32327541\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 395857007\nDuration 4398.411189\nBit Rate 999808\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 65911\nExtradata Size 105\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 4/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nLanguage und\nHandler Name VideoHandler\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 5/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 24000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nTime Base 1/24000\nStart Pts 864\nStart Time 0.036\nDuration Ts 105563510\nDuration 4398.479583\nBit Rate 94688\nNb Frames 103090\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 6/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nLanguage und\nHandler Name SoundHandler\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 4398.515583\nSize 604860773\nBit Rate 1100118\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand isom\nMinor Version 512\nCompatible Brands isomiso2avc1mp41\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 7/8\nMetadata of AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27...\nEncoder Lavf56.40.100\nRaw Header 00 00 00 20 66 74 79 70 69 73 6F 6D 00 00 02\n00 69 73 6F 6D 69 73 6F 32 61 76 63 31 6D 70\n34 31 00 2F 5D 42 6D 6F 6F 76 00 00 00 6C 6D\n76 68 64 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n00 00 03 E8 00 43 1D 90 00 01 00 00 01 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00\n00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\nMetadata ofAdamMusgrove... www.metadata2go.com Page 8/8\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27294709-2.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "AdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27294709-2.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.26, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:23.093674", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "justin@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are. Since it\u2019s clear to me that\nI am being denied equal justice I want to highlight some concerns and reasons followed by my desired outcomes or\nsolutions. I appreciate you taking the no one to read this.\nI haven\u2019t had any significant time to get acquainted with the cases evidence witnesses or discuss even preliminary high\nlevel defense strategies. This case stems back to July 4th so I think it should be obvious that it\u2019s bothering you\nsomehow to do so, and either way it\u2019s too serious for me to give you any more chances.\nWe have agreed to talk dozens of times and I have yet to really get a quality conversation with you to shape up the case\nfor trial, and hear we are already facing readiness.. again.\nI\u2019ve left multiple emails and text and calls; dozens trying to get b the court date confirmed and you would not reply\nback. What\u2019s stranger is the court clerks told me I could not obtain my court date info with no case number and they\nconstantly refer me to you. It\u2019s almost like I\u2019m being manipulated and gas lighted and it all feels very immature and\nchildish to say the least.\nToday\u2019s ordeal of being scolded about missing TEO dates when the date I had last noted was the 18th\u2026 this isn\u2019t my\nstyle. I do my homework. I\u2019m on time. I graduated Cum Laud in an accredited engineering school. Worked my through\nduel majors in info science. Slouch I am not. And don\u2019t like being mistreated and lied to.\nThis case is a wonderful mess and it very likely has some officials in Wenatchee and probably Seattle also; sweating.\nNot my intention but also not at all my fault, either.\nYou see I simply called for medical help for my disabled friend and we were told our only option was to get on a personal\ncar with strangers\u2026 and being the good hearted person of trusting faith who I am; I no was taken for a ride.. no pun\nintended.\nI surmise we were lucky n to escape alive and I have some key details which are illustrated by the \u201cvictims\u201d own\nstatement, photographs and probably the 911 call recordings which is another issue entirely.\nI\u2019ve demonstrated that there were nefarious bad actors in this event. People who targeted us before we even called for\nthe ambulance. Then I s things escalated there was an unknown person who was ushered out the back door and\ncoached to flee fast before the police arrived. This woman as it turns out, was\nSALLY BAGSHAW. Former senior prosecutor and city council in Seattle. Embattled representative who aggressively\nprotected Ed Murray even after his incredibly I disgusting history of pedophilia accusations made by African American\nFoster Children.\nThere seems to be a pattern here with these people.\nViolate public trust\nGas light victims\nPlay victim while doing horribly things\nAccuse the accusers of being the culprits\nWithout a doubt Sally Bagshaw will have to get real creative to explain what she was doing at that crummy ranch house\nand why she attempted to flee before police arrived.\nOne of the main reasons this case cannot proceed until I formally have a chance to obtain new counsel;\nThe court staff I pointed out our first day\u2026 superior court stenographer. She was actually involved in the rouse.\nThe merits of the case I feel, represent a clear case of kidnapping and extortion. We were told the only way my friend\nwouldn\u2019t die, is if we got into these folks car. Initially dispatch also lied and said we were going to be picked up by city\ncouncilman. Instead it was rather more dispatchers for the questionable Riverside.\nIn addition they interfered with a medical duress call.\nAnd most disturbing of all\nIn the reports and statements; they made multiple attempts to get me to leave alone. Without my passenger who\nneeded insulin.\nNo sense in claiming they had intended to help her because they never did get her medical attention. So that\u2019s not why.\nI believe the plan was to kill her then chase me down and kill me, then create a false report that I fled the scene after\nkilling g her. Or even worse yet, kill her then arrest me and blame me for the murder.\nOne thing surely though; she wasn\u2019t being held onto for ransom. Or conversation. Or humor. Or money.\nI know in my heart that the plan in Wenatchee called for death to at least one of us, and then incarceration or death to\nthe other (myself). That makes me incredibly sick and I\u2019ve been perplexed by the revelations this past uear in the things\nI\u2019ve discovered afoot around me.\nIt\u2019s sick! And I am not sitting down quietly, I have tactfully presented my findings to a variety of agencies and entities\nand my goal is I to eradicate these criminally corrupt city I people so no more innocent people are harmed.\nI am asking respectfullyfor two things:\n1:) your resignation from this case; and I presume you are released to hear that. I get it. No hard feelings.\n2:) formal request for change of venue due to excessive concerns of witnesses and personell with conflict of interest;\nA) stenographer\nB) Riverside dispatcher #1\nC) Riverside Dispatcher #2\nD) Riverside dispatcher #3\nThese people occupy N salaried positions within the very same courthouse as the halls of justice I am no expected to\npress my case before; and I think it\u2019s foolish to pretend there will be a fair trial of held in Chelan or Douglas.\nI\u2019d hope for some place like Olympia since we now have emerging evidence of a major political scandal amidst this case.\nI\u2019d request to be in the presence of a jury and court personnel who can ensure integrity with a jury trial which involves\nsophisticated deep state orientated bad actors and brazen corruption, disdain for justice, and a sort of grand\nmalfeasance which most mid sized communities are scared to approach.\nThe only Good Samaritan that day was myself.\nI will continue to comply with court directives and I won\u2019t miss any hearings but I have to have access to proper\nchannels in order to learn what my obligations are. I feel like I probably sound patronizing when I say things like that, but\nI can\u2019t see any other way to express that without having access to a lawyer or being told n when new court dates are\nscheduled; I can\u2019t see how I am expected to show up.\nFurther; it\u2019s my understanding the original al court date was on the 5th. I missed that not knowing so they scheduled me\na new court date for today. How am I supposed to know that?\nThe gist I of it all feels like I\u2019m being toyed with by a judge that has some sort of childish vendetta for me. Which is\npretty sad since I have no prior experience with any of you. And if my free speach offended you this much, you folks\npicked the wrong profession. Because this country and our bygone laws as well as our spirit moving forward; are\nfounded firmly around this Nations unrivaled no holds barred FREEDOM OF SPEACH.\nI\u2019m not sure where you learned but I have no doubt t you must have studied more law then I have; but one of my\nmost formative experiences was a Jewish Holocaust survivor I had for a teacher in grade school; and she spent an entire\nweek covering the topic at that time in the 1980\u2019s, about Skinheads and the Aryann Nation, the KKK etc. As kids we\ncouldn\u2019t believe it was tolerated. \u201cSurely it\u2019s illegal!\u201d. No, it\u2019s not. She explained. She went on to quote and provide\nexamples illustrating how the country can only hold up free speech rights by protecting the most hated speech first.\nAnd she taught us that she doesn\u2019t care for it but she doesn\u2019t have to. And it\u2019s not her life she doesn\u2019t have to live that\nway. They do. It doesn\u2019t bother her.\nI\u2019m no right winger. Not racist. I do have concerns about pedophiles grooming school kids. I do have concerns with\nphony liberals and vocalize them. But that\u2019s because I was raised in an established democratic family and felt they failed\nto do the right thing g too many times. And to be honest it was just this sort of dishonest conduct.\nFor the level of contempt one of two things is occurring. You all are spending too much time n on my social media where\nI\u2019ve been bound to whole undergoing this trial. Or you have a particularly right wing mind set, regardless of party\nidentify. We are all fluid social animals. Don\u2019t get hu g up on my personal life of acting a fool online to pass time etc.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case.pdf", "filename": "email_Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.193651", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important", "summary": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_RE-__External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "email_RE-__External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.07, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.920648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nChecksum 5491a833bacfdeaed408f4861984e0f6\nFilename 20240704_173916.mp4\nFilesize 107 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 v2 [ISO 14496-14]\nMinorversion 0.0.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 mp42\nMediadatasize 107010106\nMediadataoffset 40\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nModifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTimescale 10000\nDuration 0:00:50\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nPreviewduration 0 s\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 1/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nPlaymode SEQ_PLAY\nAuthor Samsung SM-A426U\nAndroidversion 13\nAndroidcapturefps 30\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackmodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 0:00:50\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 1920\nImageheight 1080\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 1920\nSourceimageheight 1080\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nColorprofiles nclx\nColorprimaries BT.709\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 2/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTransfercharacteristics BT.709\nMatrixcoefficients BT.709\nVideoframerate 30.119\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediamodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediatimescale 48000\nMediaduration 0:00:50\nHandlertype Audio Track\nHandlerdescription SoundHandle\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 48000\nImagesize 1920x1080\nMegapixels 2.1\nAvgbitrate 17.3 Mbps\nRotation 90\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 3/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 1920\nHeight 1080\nCoded Width 1920\nCoded Height 1080\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 40\nColor Range tv\nColor Space bt709\nColor Transfer bt709\nColor Primaries bt709\nChroma Location left\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 30/1\nAvg Frame Rate 7465000/247849\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 4461282\nDuration 49.5698\nBit Rate 17014702\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 4/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 1493\nExtradata Size 35\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name VideoHandle\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 5/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nSide Data List\n0\nSide Data Type Display Matrix\nDisplaymatrix 00000000: 0\n65536 0\n00000001: -65536\n0 0\n00000002: 0\n0 1073741824\nRotation -90\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 48000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 6/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTime Base 1/48000\nStart Pts 3048\nStart Time 0.0635\nDuration Ts 2374619\nDuration 49.471229\nBit Rate 256015\nNb Frames 2319\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 7/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name SoundHandle\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 49.5698\nSize 107034115\nBit Rate 17274084\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand mp42\nMinor Version 0\nCompatible Brands isommp42\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.000000Z\nCom.android.version 13\nCom.android.capture.fps 30\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 8/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nRaw Header 00 00 00 18 66 74 79 70 6D 70 34 32 00 00\n00 00 69 73 6F 6D 6D 70 34 32 00 00 00 01\n6D 64 61 74 00 00 00 00 06 60 D8 4A 21 11\n45 00 14 50 01 46 FF F1 0A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 9/9\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.27, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.091662", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=\u2026=msg-f:1831672489715170539&simpl=msg-f:1831672489715170539&mb=1 Page 1 of 5", "summary": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.679669", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed\nto me but the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong\ndoing and expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls\ncontrary to the claim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position\nthat you did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this\ninformation. Tampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts\n(although this would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting\nare crimes. There are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and\nhave no ability to charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who\ncan charge a felony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on\nprosecutors and governments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy,\nevidence. Certainly, despite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set\npeople up. I just do not see that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several\npoeple, typically police, working outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not\ngenerally a multi-agency coverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple\npolice, a person or persons who can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data\nthere, and the tow truck company. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and\nfreedom (as these would all be clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I\nreally just do not see that happening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms\nof evidence, they did not bother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial\nregarding the alleged threats themselves will have to come from their testimony.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah\nworked for rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I\nspoke to had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged\nher and she persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID\nFOR. How many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor\nabsolute Brady related potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of\nthe emergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and\nsome symptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so\nbadly I had to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of\nitself which will be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on\nour experience together, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me\nparanoid and claiming I was trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright\nlie and you are absolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and\nI proactively dismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t\njudge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania\njersey Maryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life\nlessons with small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being\nbuddies with a sheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down\nmultimillion dollar jobs because I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the\ngrandma who was their clerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the\ndoubt that I\u2019m not your average udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it\ncompletely refusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some\nwacky conspiracy concern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell\nservice and were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and\ndrive us to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the\nhospital. I asked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then\nsaying an ambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This\nlie was a trick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too\nfar to go for help. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no\ntow. There was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road\nwith two flats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you\nguys keep mentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off\nthat same night with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to\nthe dispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The\ntire was flat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and\nthe wheel before getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes\na ton of these.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because\nthere\u2019s everyone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated\nimpound bill dispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that\nclarified also and on the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the\nai generated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all\nof which was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back\nmachine internet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam\nall sorts of red tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of\nproving my innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the\nred Tacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them\napproaching at a pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the\ndisagrees called in on me so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of\nraising my hands and calmly indicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was\nout of the view of their dash cams and they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to\nshoot and even falsely claiming I was holding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again;\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nall I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s life. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed\nand never asked for. I was beaten threatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold\nblood by co-conspirators. Because their force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in\nconjunction with the bad actors who originated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of\ndoze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of your portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect\nlocation of arrest can be used to alter the timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the\nleast, needed to get near any bridge. And the implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues\nwhich I am exhaustively trying to outline as exculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself.\nAnyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor altercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical\nlocation of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain\nof evidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026\nand the father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s\na horrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence,\nassigning ineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his\nluck BUT NOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only\nimagine what might have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we\nwere kidnapped and denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They\ntried to extort me for unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my\ntruck presumably for a abandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is\nfalse, especially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one\nbut you is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and\nthey kept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely\nskeptical and think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some\ntime to think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that\nyou didn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring\nlight to the to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nof the employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to\npress that we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s\nfor two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY\nCREATED HER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all\nalong. I showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded\nby either Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.660669", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to\njustice for her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been\nrushed to critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a\ncoalition of grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me,\nand that this is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my\nown civil rights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne 2.pdf", "filename": "email_BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne 2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.589643", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "heriberto@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:41 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nJustin\nI\u2019m frustrated about the potential loss of exculpatory evidence in my case.", "body": "Gmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: Police Report\n1 message\nRyan Hell Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:41 AM\nTo: heriberto@titushallssellers.com\nJustin\nI\u2019m frustrated about the potential loss of exculpatory evidence in my case. This incident happened back in July 4th and\nI still have not heard from anyone regarding the 911 call logs.\nI think the dispatch call logs are very fragile since the alleged victims in this case are actual dispatchers and the\ncase involves at least three dispatchers from the same dispatch call center (riverside).\nI have not had a chance to talk to you regarding this incident and I am bound by a court order to not contact said\nwitnesses so thereby I am prohibited from obtaining these records myself.\nI am contacting the regional FBI office as well as state patrol today to attempt to create an incident report and\nexpress my grave concern that justice is being denied to me and exculpatory evidence is intentionally being scuttled\nby the city of Chelan.\nThe 911 call very clearly was an emergency call to get ambulatory care for my passenger who is a 60 year old diabetic\nand was going into insulin shock due to extreme conditions and not having her insulin for two days in extreme heat\nwithout food or water. They were very clearly told numerous times that I was not asking for mechanical help of any\nsort and I would deal with my vehicle myself.\nThis is absolutely the most absurd and rediculous case I am aware of. It\u2019s ludicrous it\u2019s being charged and it\u2019s\nextremely disturbing that nobody is talking to me about my case and I have yet to obtain legal defense who will\nacquire the absolutely critical and exculpatory 911 recordings.\nAgain, given that these alleged victims are all dispatchers at the very center my call was made to: it\u2019s critical to obtain\nthese call logs and recordings asap.\nPlease let me know what the situation is. I can\u2019t help but think that this is collusion. The judge should have been able\nto see this case was a complete farce and they were absolutely criminal for kidnapping holding hostage then extorting\nme.\nYou guys need to realize that this isn\u2019t some joke to me and I need some answers. I won\u2019t sit on my hands while you\nfolks disappear my 911 call recordings. I will be as proactive as possible and contact everyone I can.\nIf you cannot find the time to do it then please schedule me a hearing so I can request permission to obtain them\nmyself.\nThank you Justin. If you are truly swamped I get that, and I am sorry and didn\u2019t mean to come across as angry. I\u2019m\njust facing a lot of time for a crime I never committed, three felonies.\nI haven\u2019t had so much as even a speeding ticket or late library book since 2002.I put myself thru accredited university,\nstarted three llc\u2019s one of which was in Wenatchee (Apple Valley Pc), I have pushed hard to stay on my own two feet\nafter divorce and homelessness in nyc where I was during Covid. I worked my way across the country to come home\nto be with my 98 year old grandmother who is in last years. This is robbing me of that.\nI did nothing wrong. These scumbags were not good Samaritans. They were bandits who laid a booby trap on public\nland then denied a sick woman emergency medical care and berated the man who called her help, and attempted to\nextort money. They destroyed my vehicle which I have had for almost a decade and driven all over this country to\nwork, move my wife and I, and also to volunteer which I can substantiate a lot of free voluntary trips to work with a\nvariety of agencies.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:19 PM\nGmail - Re: Police Report https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThis incident absolutely DISGUST ME. It has me ready to puke. I am outraged that bc the city of Wenatchee is\nengaging in a cover up of this magnitude, for some toothless creeps. Predators is what they are. I\u2019ll be waiting for a\nreply. Thank you for your time\nRyan Hell\nOn Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 9:35 AM Beto Martinez wrote:\nGood morning Ryan,\nAttached, please find the reports and statements for your Chelan County Superior Court case.\nIf you have any questions please let me know.\nThank you\nBeto\n--\nHeriberto Martinez\nLegal Assistant\nTitus, Halls & Sellers, Attorneys\n23 S. Wenatchee Ave. Suite 117\nPhone: 509-888-5271\nFax: 1-509-834-7180\n*This email message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential information. If you have received this\nemail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:19 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_WarnedOfExculp-911AudioTitusSep-25-24.pdf", "filename": "email_WarnedOfExculp-911AudioTitusSep-25-24.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.902647", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_24C06401.pdf", "filename": "email_24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.491642", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\n3 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\n4 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me\nfor unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or endorse\nthem. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false, especially\ncitations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their property.\nI am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat to get a\ngun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated the\nthreat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this seems\nlike a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since the\nalleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make that\nthey get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 12:03 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "filename": "SeanEstworthy_poss_duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.15, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.700669", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy Sean,", "summary": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion!", "body": "Discrepancy\nSean,\nYou are doing a fantastic job! I\u2019m so glad you reminded me to address Protocol 33 along with our evidence\npreservation motion! Brilliant idea, counsel\u2019!\nHere is some further clarification regarding the relevance of Protocol 33, as cited in my prior correspondence, and to\naddress your request for the source of this protocol. This information directly supports my motion to preserve\nevidence, as it establishes that RiverCom 911\u2019s handling of my 911 call violated mandatory emergency medical\ndispatch protocols, potentially constituting evidence tampering or negligence relevant to my case. Below, I outline the\nregulatory framework, RiverCom\u2019s adherence to these protocols, and their implications.\n1. Overview of Protocol 33 in Emergency Medical Dispatch Protocol 33 is a component of the Medical Priority\nDispatch System (MPDS), a standardized protocol used by 911 dispatch centers to triage and respond to medical\nemergency calls. Specifically, Protocol 33 addresses urgent medical emergencies, including inter-facility transfers and\nconditions such as suspected strokes or severe diabetic crises. It requires dispatchers to:\n\u2022 Classify the call based on reported symptoms.\n\u2022 Dispatch appropriate emergency medical services (EMS), such as paramedics.\n\u2022 Maintain the call\u2019s priority level unless a qualified medical professional (e.g., paramedic or physician) provides\ndocumented clearance.\nIn my case, the 911 call reported a potential stroke and a passenger with Type 1 diabetes who had not received\ninsulin, food, or water for two days\u2014both qualifying as medical emergencies under Protocol 33. The dispatcher\u2019s\nreduction of this call to a \u201croadside call\u201d without triage, medical assessment, or clearance violates these standards.\n2. RiverCom 911\u2019s Adherence to MPDS and Protocol 33 RiverCom 911, which serves Chelan and Douglas Counties,\nexplicitly utilizes the MPDS, including Protocol 33, as part of its dispatch operations. This is documented on\nRiverCom\u2019s official resources and training materials, accessible via their website (www.rivercom911.org). Specifically:\n\u2022 RiverCom\u2019s \u201cAbout Us\u201d and \u201cServices\u201d sections confirm that their dispatchers are trained and certified in MPDS\nprotocols to ensure compliance with national and state standards for emergency response.\n\u2022 RiverCom 911 Training Manual (referenced in their training materials) mandates the use of MPDS for all medical\nemergency calls, aligning with industry best practices for 911 operations.\nThis establishes that RiverCom is bound by Protocol 33\u2019s requirements when handling medical emergency calls, such\nas mine.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\n3. Washington State\u2019s Regulatory Authority Washington State further mandates compliance with MPDS protocols,\nincluding Protocol 33, through its regulatory framework for emergency medical services:\n\u2022 WAC 246-976-001 and WAC 246-976-182: These regulations, under the Washington Administrative Code, govern\nemergency medical services and require 911 dispatch centers to adhere to standardized protocols, protocols like\nMPDS to ensure proper EMS response to medical emergencies. WAC 246-976-182 specifically mandates that\ndispatchers dispatchers align EMS response with the reported severity of the call\u2019s severity.\n\u2022 RCW 70.168: This statute establishes the state\u2019s emergency medical Services and trauma care system, system\nrequiring coordinated dispatch responses to medical emergencies, emergencies consistent with protocols like MPDS.\nThese laws obligate RiverCom to follow Protocol 33, ensuring that medical emergencies are not improperly\ndowngraded without proper medical justification.\n4. Relevance to My Motion and Brady Implications The dispatcher\u2019s failure to follow Protocol 33 in my case\u2014\ndowngrading a medical emergency without triage or clearance\u2014raises concerns about evidence integrity, as the CAD\nfile reflects this improper action. This is directly relevant to my motion to preserve evidence, including CAD files,\ndispatch logs, radio communications, and metadata, to investigate potential tampering or negligence. Under Brady v.\nMaryland (373 U.S. 83 (1963)), the prosecution is obligated to disclose exculpatory evidence, including evidence of\nprocedural violations or tampering that could undermine the credibility of the state\u2019s case. The violation of Protocol 33\nconstitutes such evidence, as it suggests mishandling of my 911 call that could have impacted the incident\u2019s outcome.\n5. Request for Action Given the above, I respectfully request that you:\n\u2022 Incorporate this information into our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to my motion to preserve evidence.\n\u2022 Emphasize the Brady implications of RiverCom\u2019s protocol violation.\n\u2022 Pursue forensic analysis of the CAD file and related evidence to determine if tampering occurred, as the date\ndiscrepancy (May 27, 2025) remains unresolved despite your ambiguous / vague explanation citing \u201cin the range of\nwhen you requested it\u201d.\nPlease confirm receipt of this email and advise on next steps. If you require additional documentation or legal\ncitations, I am happy to assist in providing them.\nI\u2019m not a lawyer and I never attended law school or graduated a legal or social program. But I am capable of utilizing a\nnetwork of resources to provide help occasionally and I don\u2019t mind helping you with portions of the job which your\nAlma mater left out of corricul. Holefully someday this knowledge comes into play for one of your dui clients who you\ndefend.\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\nSincerely,\nRyan Hell\n267-777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:44 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n(1) Whether to pursue a plea deal or not is your call.\n(2) I'll file a short response today.\n(3) Where does this information about protocol 33 come from?\n(4) The 5/27/25 date corresponds to the time frame that I submitted the public records request to\nobtain the CAD log. This is consistent with other public records requests that I have made.\nThey have a portal here: https://rivercom911.org/public-records/\nPublic Records - RiverCom 911\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nHow RiverCom Responds to a Request for Public Records RiverCom will acknowledge a request for public\nrecords within five (5) business days of receiving the request, by one of the following: Provide the record\nAcknowledge the receipt of the request and provide a reasonable estimate of time to respond to and/or\ncomplete the request Request clarification of the record request\nrivercom911.org\n(5) I have also requested information on the license plate you have requested which you believe is\nSally Bagshaw.\n(6) I'll just give you the bottom line so you can decide if you want to ask for a new attorney on Monday\nor what.\nI think the odds this situation was orchestrated by some former disgraced Seattle employee and/or\nsome former city attorney is probably close to zero. I do not really engage or follow in conspiratorial\ncommunities or thinking and I am just looking at this for what it appears to be.\nIt seems more likely that you did get stuck in a remote area you believed would cut through back to the\nroads, but it did not, and you were stranded in hot weather with a passenger who was having a\nmedical emergency. You then called 911 for help.\nWhether you did or did not ask for it, they sent a tow truck and an off-duty dispatcher, Jeremiah\nJohnson, to find the truck. Jeremiah Johnson took you and the passenger back to his house. At some\npoint, the tow truck people started asking you to pay them for the tow.\nThere was a dispute over whether you should pay them at all and also that you had previously\ndisclosed to them that you were homeless and did not have any money. Thus, they should not have\nexpected payment.\nIt is around this time that they are alleging that during this dispute, you made a statement which\nconveyed something to the effect of \"you will take a bullet before you take my truck\" although the\nstatements from them seem to have varying versions of this alleged threat.\nIt was at this point, the guy's wife started filming on her phone and that he called the police.\nThe argument continued (without any further threat allegations from you), the wife makes some\nstatements and her own threat towards you. The husband approaches you around this same time\nframe and gets pretty close to the point where you pull out what appears to be a knife and then put it\naway. Both he and you called the cops.\nThen the cops arrived, essentially just taking the other people at their word, and arrested you.\nI still do not believe at this point that you have identified any particular defense to the allegation except\nto \"change the narrative.\"\nIf this case proceeds to trial, a judge will determine what comes into evidence and what does not. A\njury will hear the evidence that the judge lets in. That jury will be provided with a packet of papers\ncalled jury instructions which will outline some legal principles. Several of these documents will pertain\nto what the crime of harassment is legally defined as. The only thing the jury is called on to do is do\ndecide if the State, through the prosecutor, has proven that you committed these crimes beyond a\nreasonable doubt.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nThe base WPIC is here (and cites to several other ones): https://govt.westlaw.com/wcrji/Document/\nI093c5d8ba75611dd8931e514b9d4bd12?viewType=FullText&originationContext=\nView Document - Washington Criminal Jury Instructions - Westlaw\nTitle of crime. For ease of reference, the committee has referred to this crime as \u201cfelony harassment.\u201d\nThe word \u201cfelony\u201d should not be included unless the jury is also being instructed on the gross\nmisdemeanor form of the crime, WPIC 36.07.\ngovt.westlaw.com\nThere is no possibility during this trial that anyone besides you gets convicted of anything. Anyone\ncharged would get their own separate trial if they were ever charged. The only potential outcomes are\nthat the jury finds you guilty, not guilty, or cannot make a decision and there is a hung jury or mis-trial,\nwhich leaves open the possibility of another trial.\nIf you are convicted, you will have the right to appeal.\nWhile certain things will be relevant towards the potential bias of law enforcement or the parties\ninvolved (that at least Johnson was a dispatcher), it will be the jury that decides who is credible, or not,\nfactoring that bias in.\nMost of the potential jury pool is going to be just ordinary people who live in Chelan County. While\nsome may enjoy conspiracies, it is unlikely that all, or even most, of them will. And my assumption\nwould be that most, if not all, will not. It is also likely the judge will limit the evidence presented at trial\nto things they deem relevant to the issue of guilt, based upon the rules of evidence, and is probably\nnot even going to allow any tin-foil hat sort of stuff, although that will be their call.\nUltimately, you will likely need to testify in this case (although you have the right not to), if you want to\npresent your side of the case to the jury. Most likely, they are going to want to know if you made the\nalleged statement or not. If you did, they will want to know if it was a serious threat. If you did not, they\nwill want to know why these people are making this up. I do not think they will buy some story about a\nconspiracy to set you up in the middle of nowhere in Malaga, Washington and shake you down for a\nthousand dollars.\nIf you did make the statement, there are still some potential defenses as the threat, if made, was\napparently conditional, only in defense of your property, and in the context of a relatively long\nargument.\nJeremiah Johnson tells the cop in the video at about 37:45 that he wasn't worried about \"stepping it\nup\" until the knife portion, which was after well after the alleged threat.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Friday, June 20, 2025 6:03 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File\nDiscrepancy\nSubject: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy\nSean,\nI am writing to ensure our rebuttal to the prosecutor\u2019s opposition to the motion to preserve forensic metadata and\nlogs, scheduled for hearing next week, clearly addresses two critical issues:\n- a likely violation of International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD)\nprotocols by the RiverCom 911 dispatcher\n- a suspicious date discrepancy in the provided CAD file.\nThese issues are directly relevant to my defense against the felony harassment charges (RCW 9A.36.046) and\nconstitute exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, as they could demonstrate evidence tampering and\nmisrepresentation of my intent during the July 4, 2024, incident.\nThe CAD file for my initial 911 call confirms I reported a medical emergency for my type 1 diabetic passenger, who\nwas in possible insulin shock, underscoring my urgent request for help. However, the dispatcher marked the call as\n\u201cnot medical\u201d at the end, falsely claiming I retracted the emergency by stating my passenger was fine\u2014a claim I\nadamantly deny.\nUnder IAED EMD guidelines, specifically Protocol 33 for diabetic emergencies, dispatchers must assign a\nhigh-priority code (e.g., Delta) and dispatch an ambulance unless there is clear, documented evidence of\nretraction or on-scene medical verification that no emergency exists.\nNo such evidence exists, as I consistently pleaded for an ambulance.\nThe dispatcher\u2019s reclassification without justification violates EMD protocols and suggests an attempt to\ndownplay the medical emergency, aligning with the prosecution\u2019s narrative that I threatened individuals\nover a (non-existent) tow bill dispute, as emphasized in the harassment CAD file (call number 240700787).\nThe dispatcher\u2019s conduct during the call was highly unprofessional and irregular.\nShe answered rudely, saying, \u201cWhat? What do you want?\u201d and initially garbled her identity, only clarifying it was\nRiverCom 911 after I pressed her.\nWhen I requested an ambulance, she refused, stating, \u201cIt\u2019s the 4th of July, honey, there are no ambulances,\u201d and\ninsisted a mechanic inspect my truck\u2019s flat tire as a condition for any help.\nI refused repairs or towing to avoid potential extortion but agreed to a visual inspection only to secure ambulatory\nassistance, stipulating no repair bills.\nHer prior knowledge of my truck\u2019s condition within seconds of my initial call; which I hadn\u2019t mentioned, and her\nrefusal to dispatch an ambulance without mechanic involvement are absent from the CAD file, indicating possible\nomission or editing.\nThese actions breach IAED EMD protocols, which prioritize medical response over unrelated conditions, and\nsupport my claim that the dispatcher\u2019s handling was targeted and prejudiced, possibly tied to broader evidence\nmanipulation in this case.\nThe CAD Master Call Table for the harassment call (240700787), visibly dated 05/27/25, raises further concerns.\nThis date, nearly a year after the incident on July 4, 2024, suggests the file may have been edited, exported, or\naltered before being provided in discovery.\nGmail - Re: Rebuttal for Forensics Motion \u2013 IAED EMD Protocol Violation and CAD File Discrepancy 1/3/26, 12:10 PM\nCAD systems log modifications with timestamps and user IDs, and a future date could indicate tampering to align\nwith the prosecution\u2019s narrative.\nMetadata analysis, as requested in our forensics motion, could confirm when and by whom this file was accessed or\nedited, directly challenging the integrity of the evidence used against me.\nThe dispatchers felony harassment CAD file also references a prior call (likely 24C06391) where my passenger and\nI were assisted but omits critical medical details, further suggesting selective reporting to frame me as aggressive\nrather than a person acting under duress to save a life.\nTo strengthen our defense, please include the following in the rebuttal:\n(1) Argue that the dispatcher\u2019s reclassification of my medical call as \u201cnot medical\u201d violates IAED EMD Protocol 33,\nlacking documented evidence of retraction, and request access to RiverCom\u2019s audit logs to verify the change\u2019s\nlegitimacy.\n(2) Highlight the 05/27/25 date discrepancy on the CAD file as evidence of potential tampering, necessitating\nmetadata analysis to confirm its modification history.\nThese points are exculpatory, as they could prove the prosecution\u2019s evidence was manipulated to misrepresent my\nactions, undermining the harassment charges.\nPlease confirm by email that this rebuttal has been filed by June 23, 2025.\nSincerely, Ryan :)", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Rebuttal_for_Forensics_Motion___IAED_EMD_Protocol_Violation_and_CAD_File_Discrepancy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.16, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.720669", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate.", "body": "The data shown is all the metadata we could automatically extract from your file. It may be neither\ncomplete nor adequate. Metadata could have been changed or deleted in the past. Please be\naware that the metadata is provided without liability.\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nChecksum 5491a833bacfdeaed408f4861984e0f6\nFilename 20240704_173916.mp4\nFilesize 107 MB\nFiletype MP4\nFiletypeextension mp4\nMimetype video/mp4\nMajorbrand MP4 v2 [ISO 14496-14]\nMinorversion 0.0.0\nCompatiblebrands\n0 isom\n1 mp42\nMediadatasize 107010106\nMediadataoffset 40\nMovieheaderversion 0\nCreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nModifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTimescale 10000\nDuration 0:00:50\nPreferredrate 1\nPreferredvolume 100.00%\nPreviewtime 0 s\nPreviewduration 0 s\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 1/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nPostertime 0 s\nSelectiontime 0 s\nSelectionduration 0 s\nCurrenttime 0 s\nNexttrackid 3\nPlaymode SEQ_PLAY\nAuthor Samsung SM-A426U\nAndroidversion 13\nAndroidcapturefps 30\nTrackheaderversion 0\nTrackcreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackmodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nTrackid 1\nTrackduration 0:00:50\nTracklayer 0\nTrackvolume 0.00%\nImagewidth 1920\nImageheight 1080\nGraphicsmode srcCopy\nOpcolor 0 0 0\nCompressorid avc1\nSourceimagewidth 1920\nSourceimageheight 1080\nXresolution 72\nYresolution 72\nBitdepth 24\nColorprofiles nclx\nColorprimaries BT.709\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 2/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTransfercharacteristics BT.709\nMatrixcoefficients BT.709\nVideoframerate 30.119\nMatrixstructure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1\nMediaheaderversion 0\nMediacreatedate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediamodifydate 2024:07:05 00:40:06\nMediatimescale 48000\nMediaduration 0:00:50\nHandlertype Audio Track\nHandlerdescription SoundHandle\nBalance 0\nAudioformat mp4a\nAudiochannels 2\nAudiobitspersample 16\nAudiosamplerate 48000\nImagesize 1920x1080\nMegapixels 2.1\nAvgbitrate 17.3 Mbps\nRotation 90\nCategory video\nStreams\n0\nIndex 0\nCodec Name h264\nCodec Long Name H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC /\nMPEG-4 part 10\nProfile High\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 3/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nCodec Type video\nCodec Tag String avc1\nCodec Tag 0x31637661\nWidth 1920\nHeight 1080\nCoded Width 1920\nCoded Height 1080\nHas B Frames 0\nPix Fmt yuv420p\nLevel 40\nColor Range tv\nColor Space bt709\nColor Transfer bt709\nColor Primaries bt709\nChroma Location left\nField Order progressive\nRefs 1\nIs Avc true\nNal Length Size 4\nId 0x1\nR Frame Rate 30/1\nAvg Frame Rate 7465000/247849\nTime Base 1/90000\nStart Pts 0\nStart Time 0\nDuration Ts 4461282\nDuration 49.5698\nBit Rate 17014702\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 4/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nBits Per Raw Sample 8\nNb Frames 1493\nExtradata Size 35\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name VideoHandle\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 5/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nSide Data List\n0\nSide Data Type Display Matrix\nDisplaymatrix 00000000: 0\n65536 0\n00000001: -65536\n0 0\n00000002: 0\n0 1073741824\nRotation -90\n1\nIndex 1\nCodec Name aac\nCodec Long Name AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)\nProfile LC\nCodec Type audio\nCodec Tag String mp4a\nCodec Tag 0x6134706d\nSample Fmt fltp\nSample Rate 48000\nChannels 2\nChannel Layout stereo\nBits Per Sample 0\nInitial Padding 0\nId 0x2\nR Frame Rate 0/0\nAvg Frame Rate 0/0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 6/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTime Base 1/48000\nStart Pts 3048\nStart Time 0.0635\nDuration Ts 2374619\nDuration 49.471229\nBit Rate 256015\nNb Frames 2319\nExtradata Size 2\nDisposition\nDefault 1\nDub 0\nOriginal 0\nComment 0\nLyrics 0\nKaraoke 0\nForced 0\nHearing Impaired 0\nVisual Impaired 0\nClean Effects 0\nAttached Pic 0\nTimed Thumbnails 0\nNon Diegetic 0\nCaptions 0\nDescriptions 0\nMetadata 0\nDependent 0\nStill Image 0\nMultilayer 0\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 7/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nTags\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.00000\n0Z\nLanguage eng\nHandler Name SoundHandle\nVendor Id [0][0][0][0]\nFormat\nNb Streams 2\nNb Programs 0\nNb Stream Groups 0\nFormat Name mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2\nFormat Long Name QuickTime / MOV\nStart Time 0\nDuration 49.5698\nSize 107034115\nBit Rate 17274084\nProbe Score 100\nTags\nMajor Brand mp42\nMinor Version 0\nCompatible Brands isommp42\nCreation Time 2024-07-05T00:40:06.000000Z\nCom.android.version 13\nCom.android.capture.fps 30\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 8/9\nMetadata of 20240704_173916\nRaw Header 00 00 00 18 66 74 79 70 6D 70 34 32 00 00\n00 00 69 73 6F 6D 6D 70 34 32 00 00 00 01\n6D 64 61 74 00 00 00 00 06 60 D8 4A 21 11\n45 00 14 50 01 46 FF F1 0A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\n5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A\nMetadata of20240704_173916 www.metadata2go.com Page 9/9\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/MULTIPLEForensicsIndicationsofTampering20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "filename": "MULTIPLEForensicsIndicationsofTampering20240704_173916.json-metadata.pdf", "size_mb": 0.27, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:23.113674", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nSally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:39 AM\nTo: ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov\nFor times sakes I\u2019ll paste in what I already sent a judicial overbite committee.", "body": "Gmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nSally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:39 AM\nTo: ombudsmail@kingcounty.gov\nFor times sakes I\u2019ll paste in what I already sent a judicial overbite committee. For be out beers a synopsis\nSally Bagshaw traveled to Wenatchee Wa to attempt to trap and execute Ryan Hell and his passenger during a 911 call for emergency aid.\nShe was ordered to flee as deputies arrived I got her on film. Arch nemesis regarding Ed Murray exposure. Do what\u2019s right, is my advice and request.\nAs of now I\u2019m being told they are trying to killlme in custody.\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.\nThis court and primarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial.\nI am presenting evidence of a conflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit murder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll\ncontinue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask you to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect everyone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk\nand murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of July for them.\nSecomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d\nThere was a woman at the seen who was introduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the Stenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to.\nLet\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get her formal name.\nMOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING\nA KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL PROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of become a political target OF;\nSALLY BAGSHAW\nHas direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What is more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by the alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before\nthe cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t mean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and the incidents here are only\nindicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy.\nJuly 4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service aside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her\nhelp is if we went in their pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000. I reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then\nsaid he was robbing me of my truck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill. Ryan was resigned for 3x fel threats.\nInitial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned.\nI have called emailed and texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at least 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State\nbar. I recorded one response with some preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a proper working email.\nI have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail and clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades.\nI have been proactive in obtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing court clerks for Chelan county.\nI have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had concerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did not reply. I\nmentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time earlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on 911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside\nassistance for the flat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and run my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products\nthroughout the state, for 7 years while attending university.\nThe tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I respect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after tactfully defending\nhimself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do me and likely her grave harm.\nSince I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I will present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court. Again I am unable\nto access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs by judge jourdan thru.\nIn 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth works and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events namely\nmolesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations had been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount\nof this eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful inventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he\nwas in fact every bit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and he moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle.\nAccusations came out and Murray denied them. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us who had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we\ncheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong will the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad.\nIn 2017 Delvonn Heckard that plaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot of us felt like it was murder.\nWe discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only said Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the case is sitting\narchives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I simply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray lies\nwent silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned.\nHow does this apply to our case?\nIn the incident, as I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were gonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed\nonsite. I then heard a woman frantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go now just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a\npicture of, knowing she was yet another piece of evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a career politician and political figure of highest order, from\nSeattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a senior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she had aggressively controlled and swayed the\ndiecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers presented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to keep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look\nat this detail\nA former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach, probably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed Murray and fighting fellow councilman to\nkeep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court records now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more VULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented\nthen the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a disgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally.\nI\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy creating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express stimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical\nway to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even mafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express our intended message.\nI try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between some things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out.\nEd Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my name tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by professional contractors. That\nFASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat unfortunately so I dug.\nIn 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work walking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She was\nrobbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They never caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d.\nWe moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019. I\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a desert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and\nphotos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we enjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had my own as well. I was seeing multiple\nvehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting visitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all. Absolutely compliant.\nIt\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my license plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it. Then\nSally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to try to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:27 PM\nGmail - Sally Bagshaw photographed fleeing scene of attempted murder https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nresident and she is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since 2016.\nI didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a former SENIOR PROSECUTOR.\nI was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate for me, my passengers and my type of vehicle.\nI can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the way the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nwww.ryanhell.com\nSeattle Wa\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:27 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_BagshawFleeingScene-ReportedToOmbudsMan.pdf", "filename": "email_BagshawFleeingScene-ReportedToOmbudsMan.pdf", "size_mb": 2.86, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.498655", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell, Defendant\nChelan County Superior Court\nCase # 24-1-00253-04\nEXHIBIT A: METADATA PROOF (File: 20240704_173916.mp4)\nThis evidence directly supports the claims of Spoliation of Evidence and Advanced Digital\nTampering cited in the attached Motion.", "body": "Ryan Hell, Defendant\nChelan County Superior Court\nCase # 24-1-00253-04\nEXHIBIT A: METADATA PROOF (File: 20240704_173916.mp4)\nThis evidence directly supports the claims of Spoliation of Evidence and Advanced Digital\nTampering cited in the attached Motion.\n1. Concealment of Modification History (Identical Dates):\n\u25cf Createdate: 2024:07:05 00:40:06\n\u25cf Modifydate: 2024:07:05 00:40:06\n2. Evidence of Advanced Tampering/Rendering Tools:\n\u25cf Videoframerate: 30.119 (Non-standard rate indicating re-encoding)\n\u25cf Handler Name (Video Stream): VideoHandle (Component associated with 3D\nmanipulation software)\n\u25cf Handler Name (Audio Track): SoundHandle (Component associated with audio\nprocessing software)\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Exhinbit_A.pdf", "filename": "Exhinbit_A.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.139662", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\n5 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\n6 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are\nterrified of me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the\nloudest voice to share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my\nDUTY to not only make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.\n7 of 7 1/3/26, 11:52 AM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/duplicate.pdf", "filename": "duplicate.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.749670", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Good morning Brian. I am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.", "body": "Good morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for me to\nappear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to go\nover the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all councils\nassigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to cite\nformally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a year.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record, about\nthe urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD file\nthough and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the park.\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the time\nof alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she made\nto conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd rescue\nwith these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work the 911\ncenters They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know better than\nthat. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other common sense\nstuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering simple\ncritical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and \u201cwhy\ndidn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and federal\nrelief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail of sloppy\ncover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty attempt\nto cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and\nthere have been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel,\npresumably under some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom\n911. I\u2019ve been lied to on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse\nto consult for over 9 months. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his\noffice. When I arrived to watch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces\nof video that would put the prosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy\nscrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names\nthreatening to assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again\nand get them to intervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone and\nsay \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow\noperator said \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s\nfree to go by me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false\nbut entirely inflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty\nmaddening. Because I not only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed\nas they destroyed my transmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over\n2900 all said on that. And I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER\ninvestigations into Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then\nsettled lawsuit an ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king\ncounty medical examiners. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s\nevidence of needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to\nus.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were not\nallowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding irreversible\nirreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911 calls; and also I\nthink one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the spoilation of my voice\naudio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her to not let my passenger\ndie. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council member then Jeremiah shows\nup, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website. Look\naround the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made regarding\ndispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can\nmurder me but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can\nblock me away then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Re-_Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.939648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah,\nand also known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her\nstatus as an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed\nto me but the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong\ndoing and expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls\ncontrary to the claim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position\nthat you did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this\ninformation. Tampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts\n(although this would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting\nare crimes. There are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and\nhave no ability to charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who\ncan charge a felony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on\nprosecutors and governments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy,\nevidence. Certainly, despite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set\npeople up. I just do not see that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several\npoeple, typically police, working outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not\ngenerally a multi-agency coverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple\npolice, a person or persons who can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data\nthere, and the tow truck company. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and\nfreedom (as these would all be clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I\nreally just do not see that happening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms\nof evidence, they did not bother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial\nregarding the alleged threats themselves will have to come from their testimony.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah\nworked for rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I\nspoke to had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged\nher and she persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID\nFOR. How many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor\nabsolute Brady related potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick\nus up, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of\nthe emergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and\nsome symptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so\nbadly I had to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of\nitself which will be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on\nour experience together, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me\nparanoid and claiming I was trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright\nlie and you are absolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and\nI proactively dismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t\njudge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania\njersey Maryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life\nlessons with small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being\nbuddies with a sheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down\nmultimillion dollar jobs because I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the\ngrandma who was their clerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the\ndoubt that I\u2019m not your average udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it\ncompletely refusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some\nwacky conspiracy concern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell\nservice and were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and\ndrive us to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the\nhospital. I asked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then\nsaying an ambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This\nlie was a trick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too\nfar to go for help. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no\ntow. There was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road\nwith two flats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you\nguys keep mentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off\nthat same night with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to\nthe dispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The\ntire was flat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and\nthe wheel before getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes\na ton of these.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because\nthere\u2019s everyone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated\nimpound bill dispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that\nclarified also and on the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the\nai generated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all\nof which was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back\nmachine internet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam\nall sorts of red tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of\nproving my innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the\nred Tacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them\napproaching at a pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the\ndisagrees called in on me so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of\nraising my hands and calmly indicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was\nout of the view of their dash cams and they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to\nshoot and even falsely claiming I was holding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again;\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nall I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s life. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed\nand never asked for. I was beaten threatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold\nblood by co-conspirators. Because their force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in\nconjunction with the bad actors who originated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of\ndoze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of your portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect\nlocation of arrest can be used to alter the timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the\nleast, needed to get near any bridge. And the implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues\nwhich I am exhaustively trying to outline as exculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself.\nAnyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor altercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical\nlocation of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain\nof evidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026\nand the father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s\na horrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence,\nassigning ineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his\nluck BUT NOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only\nimagine what might have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we\nwere kidnapped and denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They\ntried to extort me for unsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my\ntruck presumably for a abandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is\nfalse, especially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one\nbut you is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and\nthey kept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely\nskeptical and think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some\ntime to think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that\nyou didn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring\nlight to the to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:56 AM\nof the employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to\npress that we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s\nfor two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY\nCREATED HER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all\nalong. I showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded\nby either Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.655644", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the en\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve\nstatus.\nIn accordance with RCW23.95.605-610, the above en\u0000ty is hereby administra\u0000vely dissolved as of: 03/03/2025.\nThis ac\u0000on was taken due to failure of the en\u0000ty to file a required report within the \u0000me set forth by law.\nUnder RCW 23.95.615, a domes\u0000c en\u0000ty that is administra\u0000vely dissolved may apply for reinstatement no later than five (5)\nyears a\u0000er the effec\u0000ve date of administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on noted above. RCW 23.95.615 iden\u0000fies the requirements for an\napplica\u0000on for reinstatement.\nYou can access the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) online to reac\u0000vate your\nen\u0000ty using the following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. This no\u0000ce is generated as part of\nan automated no\u0000fica\u0000on process.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/C3910175-449A-4D24-974B-CF59449049CA.pdf", "filename": "C3910175-449A-4D24-974B-CF59449049CA.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.499667", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Also what is our next appearance for this motion. I have an appointment tomorrow but will check here to ensure I don\u2019t\nmiss it\nOn Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:34 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nOk, thanks for the update.", "body": "Also what is our next appearance for this motion. I have an appointment tomorrow but will check here to ensure I don\u2019t\nmiss it\nOn Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:34 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nOk, thanks for the update. Is there anything in these videos pf me making these alleged threats? I will watch them\nmyself now if possible but I would like the short answer:\nAs of last we talked there were no threats made by me in any of the videos you have watched. Can you confirm this\nis the situation still?\nAt any rate I\u2019d like to file the aforementioned Brady motion in response to the prosecutors rebuttal of my\npreservation motion. There are clear reasons why that is pertinent.\nThank you again\nRyannHell\nOn Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 1:10 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nHey Ryan,\nI double checked the Dropbox today and it looks three videos were not uploaded. I have uploaded\nthose, to include the front facing dash camera video, and two others that look like they were not\nuploaded. I also put up a public records request response about the first call which I have uploaded.\nIt does not include the call itself, just the CAD log.\nCourt is at 1:30.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, June 16, 2025 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: State's response to motion\nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the\nJudges Chambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME\nACCESS AND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me\nfor personal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he\ndistinctly says there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:38 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified\nthat any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are\nnot the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy\nall copies of the original message.\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:38 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_SeanEstworthyConfirmingNoThreatsByRyaninVidsAndPlanstoCoachWitnesses-June-18-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_SeanEstworthyConfirmingNoThreatsByRyaninVidsAndPlanstoCoachWitnesses-June-18-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.440654", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: questions@wsba.org\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nEthics Complaints Help Sought\n1 message\nRyan Hell Fri, May 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM\nTo: questions@wsba.org\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a myriad of\ncourt ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to make\nit off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was not\ncarrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911 service).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to accompany\nthe male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator, and I\nneeded to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle has\nbeen done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as auto\ntheft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\n1 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\nGmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let us\ngo, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an unknown\nfemales voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The man yelled \u201cyou\nhave to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where he is?!\u201d And the\nman yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here trying\nto do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take capture that\nevidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming behaviors and\nconduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They performed a\nbizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front (dash cam I\npresume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm voice that I am non-\ncombative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and made repeated threats\nto shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a mere 20 feet away, broad\ndaylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one more\nword. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I am\ncomplying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said the\nnext time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as I\ncompiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard trying\nto dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and I\nslammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they claimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log) \u201che\n2 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\nGmail - Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ndoesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to let\nme know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to why\nthat delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in. I\npolitely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he wanted\nto part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to come\nview video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was floored by the\negregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on video. The video\nsupports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other than to put my hands\nip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing their\nclaim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n3 of 3 1/24/26, 2:29 PM\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_ethicsComplaintMail_WSBA-May-9-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_ethicsComplaintMail_WSBA-May-9-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.417654", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "justin@titushallssellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | Chelan Superior Case\nRyan Hell Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:28 PM\nTo: \nJustin,\nGood evening. I\u2019m not sure what the outcome of today\u2019s hearing is or what my next steps are. Since it\u2019s clear to me that\nI am being denied equal justice I want to highlight some concerns and reasons followed by my desired outcomes or\nsolutions. I appreciate you taking the no one to read this.\nI haven\u2019t had any significant time to get acquainted with the cases evidence witnesses or discuss even preliminary high\nlevel defense strategies. This case stems back to July 4th so I think it should be obvious that it\u2019s bothering you\nsomehow to do so, and either way it\u2019s too serious for me to give you any more chances.\nWe have agreed to talk dozens of times and I have yet to really get a quality conversation with you to shape up the case\nfor trial, and hear we are already facing readiness.. again.\nI\u2019ve left multiple emails and text and calls; dozens trying to get b the court date confirmed and you would not reply\nback. What\u2019s stranger is the court clerks told me I could not obtain my court date info with no case number and they\nconstantly refer me to you. It\u2019s almost like I\u2019m being manipulated and gas lighted and it all feels very immature and\nchildish to say the least.\nToday\u2019s ordeal of being scolded about missing TEO dates when the date I had last noted was the 18th\u2026 this isn\u2019t my\nstyle. I do my homework. I\u2019m on time. I graduated Cum Laud in an accredited engineering school. Worked my through\nduel majors in info science. Slouch I am not. And don\u2019t like being mistreated and lied to.\nThis case is a wonderful mess and it very likely has some officials in Wenatchee and probably Seattle also; sweating.\nNot my intention but also not at all my fault, either.\nYou see I simply called for medical help for my disabled friend and we were told our only option was to get on a personal\ncar with strangers\u2026 and being the good hearted person of trusting faith who I am; I no was taken for a ride.. no pun\nintended.\nI surmise we were lucky n to escape alive and I have some key details which are illustrated by the \u201cvictims\u201d own\nstatement, photographs and probably the 911 call recordings which is another issue entirely.\nI\u2019ve demonstrated that there were nefarious bad actors in this event. People who targeted us before we even called for\nthe ambulance. Then I s things escalated there was an unknown person who was ushered out the back door and\ncoached to flee fast before the police arrived. This woman as it turns out, was\nSALLY BAGSHAW. Former senior prosecutor and city council in Seattle. Embattled representative who aggressively\nprotected Ed Murray even after his incredibly I disgusting history of pedophilia accusations made by African American\nFoster Children.\nThere seems to be a pattern here with these people.\nViolate public trust\nGas light victims\nPlay victim while doing horribly things\nAccuse the accusers of being the culprits\nWithout a doubt Sally Bagshaw will have to get real creative to explain what she was doing at that crummy ranch house\nand why she attempted to flee before police arrived.\nOne of the main reasons this case cannot proceed until I formally have a chance to obtain new counsel;\nThe court staff I pointed out our first day\u2026 superior court stenographer. She was actually involved in the rouse.\nThe merits of the case I feel, represent a clear case of kidnapping and extortion. We were told the only way my friend\nwouldn\u2019t die, is if we got into these folks car. Initially dispatch also lied and said we were going to be picked up by city\ncouncilman. Instead it was rather more dispatchers for the questionable Riverside.\nIn addition they interfered with a medical duress call.\nAnd most disturbing of all\nIn the reports and statements; they made multiple attempts to get me to leave alone. Without my passenger who\nneeded insulin.\nNo sense in claiming they had intended to help her because they never did get her medical attention. So that\u2019s not why.\nI believe the plan was to kill her then chase me down and kill me, then create a false report that I fled the scene after\nkilling g her. Or even worse yet, kill her then arrest me and blame me for the murder.\nOne thing surely though; she wasn\u2019t being held onto for ransom. Or conversation. Or humor. Or money.\nI know in my heart that the plan in Wenatchee called for death to at least one of us, and then incarceration or death to\nthe other (myself). That makes me incredibly sick and I\u2019ve been perplexed by the revelations this past uear in the things\nI\u2019ve discovered afoot around me.\nIt\u2019s sick! And I am not sitting down quietly, I have tactfully presented my findings to a variety of agencies and entities\nand my goal is I to eradicate these criminally corrupt city I people so no more innocent people are harmed.\nI am asking respectfullyfor two things:\n1:) your resignation from this case; and I presume you are released to hear that. I get it. No hard feelings.\n2:) formal request for change of venue due to excessive concerns of witnesses and personell with conflict of interest;\nA) stenographer\nB) Riverside dispatcher #1\nC) Riverside Dispatcher #2\nD) Riverside dispatcher #3\nThese people occupy N salaried positions within the very same courthouse as the halls of justice I am no expected to\npress my case before; and I think it\u2019s foolish to pretend there will be a fair trial of held in Chelan or Douglas.\nI\u2019d hope for some place like Olympia since we now have emerging evidence of a major political scandal amidst this case.\nI\u2019d request to be in the presence of a jury and court personnel who can ensure integrity with a jury trial which involves\nsophisticated deep state orientated bad actors and brazen corruption, disdain for justice, and a sort of grand\nmalfeasance which most mid sized communities are scared to approach.\nThe only Good Samaritan that day was myself.\nI will continue to comply with court directives and I won\u2019t miss any hearings but I have to have access to proper\nchannels in order to learn what my obligations are. I feel like I probably sound patronizing when I say things like that, but\nI can\u2019t see any other way to express that without having access to a lawyer or being told n when new court dates are\nscheduled; I can\u2019t see how I am expected to show up.\nFurther; it\u2019s my understanding the original al court date was on the 5th. I missed that not knowing so they scheduled me\na new court date for today. How am I supposed to know that?\nThe gist I of it all feels like I\u2019m being toyed with by a judge that has some sort of childish vendetta for me. Which is\npretty sad since I have no prior experience with any of you. And if my free speach offended you this much, you folks\npicked the wrong profession. Because this country and our bygone laws as well as our spirit moving forward; are\nfounded firmly around this Nations unrivaled no holds barred FREEDOM OF SPEACH.\nI\u2019m not sure where you learned but I have no doubt t you must have studied more law then I have; but one of my\nmost formative experiences was a Jewish Holocaust survivor I had for a teacher in grade school; and she spent an entire\nweek covering the topic at that time in the 1980\u2019s, about Skinheads and the Aryann Nation, the KKK etc. As kids we\ncouldn\u2019t believe it was tolerated. \u201cSurely it\u2019s illegal!\u201d. No, it\u2019s not. She explained. She went on to quote and provide\nexamples illustrating how the country can only hold up free speech rights by protecting the most hated speech first.\nAnd she taught us that she doesn\u2019t care for it but she doesn\u2019t have to. And it\u2019s not her life she doesn\u2019t have to live that\nway. They do. It doesn\u2019t bother her.\nI\u2019m no right winger. Not racist. I do have concerns about pedophiles grooming school kids. I do have concerns with\nphony liberals and vocalize them. But that\u2019s because I was raised in an established democratic family and felt they failed\nto do the right thing g too many times. And to be honest it was just this sort of dishonest conduct.\nFor the level of contempt one of two things is occurring. You all are spending too much time n on my social media where\nI\u2019ve been bound to whole undergoing this trial. Or you have a particularly right wing mind set, regardless of party\nidentify. We are all fluid social animals. Don\u2019t get hu g up on my personal life of acting a fool online to pass time etc.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case_2.pdf", "filename": "email_Ryan_Hell___Chelan_Superior_Case_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.631656", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT AND\nINTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior Court on\nthe MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of local\njurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE,\nCHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING\nNUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY, JUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case\npresents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence named in this motion merely highlights the few details\nfor just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which in fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather;\na dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke desperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT AND\nINTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior Court on\nthe MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of local\njurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE,\nCHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING\nNUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY, JUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case\npresents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence named in this motion merely highlights the few details\nfor just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which in fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather;\na dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke desperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to justice\nfor her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been rushed\nto critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a coalition\nof grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me, and that\nthis is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my own civil\nrights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nimage.jpeg", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Re-_Motion_To_Dismiss_With_Prejudice_Due_to_OUTRAGEOUS_Government_Misconduct__an.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Motion_To_Dismiss_With_Prejudice_Due_to_OUTRAGEOUS_Government_Misconduct__an.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.693645", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important", "summary": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...", "body": "You don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n1 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\n2 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\n3 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy,\nP.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called me to\ncome view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I was\nfloored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people on\nvideo. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone other\nthan to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\n4 of 4 1/24/26, 2:30 PM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_genericWeCantHelpYouResponseWSBA_May-9-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_genericWeCantHelpYouResponseWSBA_May-9-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.392641", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "1\n2\n3\n4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\nIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHELAN\n5\n6\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON,\n7 CASE NO.: 24-1-00253-04\nPlaintiff,\n8\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM\nvs. 9 DEFENDANT TO PRESERVE\nRYAN HELL, EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL,\n10\nPHONE, TEXT, RADIO\nDefendant.", "body": "1\n2\n3\n4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\nIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHELAN\n5\n6\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON,\n7 CASE NO.: 24-1-00253-04\nPlaintiff,\n8\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM\nvs.\n9 DEFENDANT TO PRESERVE\nRYAN HELL, EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL,\n10\nPHONE, TEXT, RADIO\nDefendant.\n11\n12\n13 I. MOTION\n14\nA. Motion to Preserve Evidence and Address Potential Spoliation\n15\nThe Defense moves to preserve the following evidence, given concerns about potential\n16\ntampering due to the case\u2019s implications of civil rights violations under color of law and ADA\n17\n18 violations:\n19\n1. All 911 call audio from July 4, 2024, specifically the defendant\u2019s initial call to Rivercom\n20\n911 requesting emergency medical services for their passenger, a type 1 diabetic with chronic\n21\n22 illnesses, including failing kidneys and a brain tumor, legally disabled under federal law and a\n23\nSocial Security recipient.\n24\nThis call establishes the defendant\u2019s sole intent was to secure urgent medical help, explicitly\n25\n26 declining roadside assistance despite dispatch\u2019s insistence. The defense is concerned this audio\n27\nmay no longer exist, as it has not been provided or acknowledged.\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -1\n2. Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) files from Rivercom 911 for the July 4, 2024, incident,\n1\n2 including call classification, timestamps, and dispatcher notes, to verify the call\u2019s existence and\n3\nhandling, especially if the audio has been lost. Washington State law requires CAD files to be\n4\nretained for three years, and with one year elapsed, preservation is urgent.\n5\n6 3. Chelan County Sheriff\u2019s communication records from July 4, 2024, including radio logs,\n7\nphone call logs, text messages, emails, and any other communication records that may document\n8\ninteractions with Rivercom 911 regarding the defendant\u2019s medical emergency call. These records\n9\nare critical to confirm Rivercom\u2019s acknowledgment of the defendant\u2019s request for an ambulance\n10\n11 and any coordination with the Sheriff\u2019s office, which may have declined involvement, as a\n12\nsecondary precaution against the prosecution\u2019s claim that no such call occurred.\n13\n4. Video evidence metadata and access logs, as described above, to ensure integrity and\n14\n15 detect tampering.\n16\n5. Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911\n17\ndispatchers, not private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\n18\n19 The defense has eyewitness testimony that these individuals work for Rivercom and\n20\ntransported the defendant and their passenger to a private residence outside cell service under\n21\nquestionable pretenses.\n22\n23 Failure to preserve this evidence risks spoliation, especially given the high propensity\n24\nfor tampering in a case involving allegations of misconduct by Rivercom personnel who failed to\n25\nsecure an ambulance for a disabled passenger.\n26\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -2\nMotion to Address Denial of Effective Counsel and Civil Rights Violations\n1\n2 The defense moves to address the denial of effective legal counsel, constituting a\n3\nviolation of the defendant\u2019s Sixth Amendment rights.\n4\nThe defendant\u2019s first attorney resigned within three days, citing corruption and\n5\n6 refusing involvement. The second attorney failed to provide evidence, communicate, or act on the\n7\ncase for nearly eight months, effectively denying representation.\n8\nThe current attorney, while filing this motion due to the defendant\u2019s inability to\n9\nafford private counsel and the distance between Seattle and Chelan County, has not denied\n10\n11 allegations of being influenced by opposing parties, raising concerns about compromised\n12\nrepresentation.\n13\nThis pattern of ineffective counsel has obstructed access to exculpatory evidence\n14\n15 critical to the defense.\n16\nAdditionally, the defense raises serious civil rights violations under color of law\n17\nand ADA violations.\n18\n19 The defendant\u2019s passenger, a disabled woman, was denied emergency medical services\n20\ndespite multiple 911 calls, exacerbating her life-threatening condition.\n21\nThe defense alleges the incident involved misconduct by Rivercom dispatchers, who\n22\n23 assaulted the defendant and demanded $1,000, as partially captured in the video.\n24\nThe defense requests an investigation into these violations, including the conduct of\n25\nRivercom dispatchers and the handling of the medical emergency call, to ensure justice and protect\n26\nthe defendant\u2019s constitutional rights.\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -3\nSummary and Urgent Relief Requested\n1\n2 The defense respectfully requests the following immediate actions:\n3\n1. Compel the prosecution to disclose all video evidence from the July 4, 2024, Malaga\n4\nincident, including metadata, forensic data, and access logs.\n5\n6 2. Preserve all 911 call audio, CAD files, Chelan County Sheriff\u2019s communication records\n7\n(radio logs, phone logs, texts, emails), video evidence, and records confirming the alleged victims\u2019\n8\nemployment as Rivercom 911 dispatchers, with associated metadata and access logs, to prevent\n9\ntampering.\n10\n11 3. Investigate the denial of effective counsel, civil rights violations under color of law,\n12\nand ADA violations stemming from the failure to provide emergency medical services to the\n13\ndefendant\u2019s disabled passenger.\n14\n15 4. Issue an order to expedite these motions due to the imminent trial date and the\n16\ndefendant\u2019s residence in Seattle, which limits their ability to file independently without counsel.\n17\nGiven the severity of the allegations, including evidence tampering and misconduct,\n18\n19 the defense urges the Court to act swiftly to ensure a fair trial and uphold justice.\n20\nTo ensure justice and transparency, I respectfully move this Court to issue an order\n21\npreserving the following evidence related to the incident:\n22\n23 1. All 911 call audio recordings from July 4, 2024, related to the incident at 7599 Colockum\n24\nRd, Malaga, WA, to verify the nature of the communications.\n25\n2. All Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) files associated with the incident, including call\n26\nclassifications, timestamps, and dispatcher notes.\n27\n28 3. All RiverCom 911 correspondence, including radio chatter, telephone calls, text\n29\nmessages, emails, and any other communications, particularly those between dispatcher Jeremiah\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -4\nand deputies, including any conducted via personal cell phones, which is irregular for official\n1\n2 business.\n3\n4. All law enforcement body camera and dash camera footage from the incident, including\n4\nunedited versions, along with all forensic metadata, access logs, and chain of custody records to\n5\n6 verify potential tampering and ensure evidence integrity.\n7\n5. All records related to the hit-and-run by the red Toyota Tacoma (license plate C204747),\n8\nincluding any communications referencing the VIP or her departure from the scene.\n9\n6. All records documenting RiverCom 911 call center logs and procedures to identify any\n10\n11 tampering or alterations.\n12\nPreservation of these materials is critical to substantiate my claims of excessive force, false\n13\naccusations, evidence tampering, and potential misconduct, given the unusually long dispatch\n14\n15 response time, which local discussion attributes to deputies waiting roadside for approximately ten\n16\nminutes before approaching the property, likely to allow the VIP to leave.\n17\n18\n19 II. STATEMENT\n20\nOn July 4, 2024, at approximately, at 7599 Colockum Rd, Malaga, WA, I, Ryan Hell, was\n21\nsubjected to an unconstitutional stop and arrest by Chelan County sheriff\u2019s deputies, involving\n22\n23 excessive force, conflicting orders, and false claims that I was holding a firearm.\n24\nDespite no weapon being present in broad daylight with no obstructions, one deputy\n25\nclaimed to see a specific make, model, and caliber of a pistol in my hand, asserting the safety was\n26\noff, while another deputy questioned if a gun was visible, escalating the situation.\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -5\nDeputies threatened to shoot me, stating, \u201cYou\u2019ve got five seconds,\u201d \u201cMy hammer\u2019s\n1\n2 back,\u201d and \u201cOne more word and you\u2019re dead,\u201d while issuing conflicting orders: one instructed me\n3\nto get on my knees and cross my ankles, while another shouted not to move or he would kill me.\n4\nI attempted to de-escalate, identifying myself as cooperative and unarmed, but collapsed\n5\n6 due to severe heat exhaustion and a muscle cramp, which likely prevented an unjustified shooting,\n7\nas I was prone and non-combative.\n8\nI possess photographs of dispatcher Jeremiah using his personal cell phone, allegedly\n9\ncommunicating with deputies, which is irregular for official business and suggests potential\n10\n11 misconduct.\n12\nI overheard deputies discussing a VIP, code-named \u201cMustang\u201d or similar, believed to be\n13\nSally Bagshaw, former Seattle councilwoman, who struck me in a hit-and-run with a red Toyota\n14\n15 Tacoma (Washington license plate C204747, 2022 or 2024 TRD Pro, dark maroon with black\n16\naccent alloy wheels).\n17\nMy photographs show the driver, attempting to cover her face, getting closer to me as I\n18\n19 held up my phone to capture the incident, before she floored the vehicle and fled.\n20\nDash camera footage, viewed at my attorney\u2019s office, appears altered, with suspicious\n21\nlighting, shading, jittering loops, and segments where individuals seem to engage in animated\n22\n23 conversations with no one present, suggesting edited-out characters.\n24\nAs a former visual analyst at Google in Kirkland, Washington, in 2010, with expertise in\n25\ngraphics development, software engineering, user interface design, and video editing since the\n26\n1990s, I can confirm these anomalies indicate tampering.\n27\n28 My attorney intended to hire a forensics expert to examine the footage, but the expert is\n29\nunavailable due to unpaid fees from a prior Chelan County case unrelated to mine.\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -6\nEvidence suggests RiverCom 911 may also be altering call center logs and procedures to\n1\n2 conceal critical communications.\n3\n4\nRespectfully submitted this ____ day of June, 2025.\n5\n6\n7\nRYAN HELL, DEFENDANT\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\n26\n27\n28\n29\n30\nSTATEMENT AND MOTION FROM DEFENDANT TO\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE, DISPATCH, CELL, PHONE,\nTEXT, RADIO -7\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/MyMotionToPreserveEvidenceWhichWasDenied.pdf", "filename": "MyMotionToPreserveEvidenceWhichWasDenied.pdf", "size_mb": 0.26, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.868659", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file this into the record Sean,", "summary": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford.", "body": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford. Help with\nher shopping, her chores, shopping, laundry and her dogs which i am helping her train. I have told Juystin during the\nfirst week, in a hearing at the courthouse, I requested access to ask the court for provisions for mrs Hrpcha and Titus\ninformed me that he didnt see her listed as a \"witness\", therefor there was no problem at that time with mrs Hrpcha\nbeing in contact with me.\nMy concern now would be restrictions on communication with mrs Hrpcha, if I add her as a witness. Obviously\nthis is a matter with importance since I generally see Mrs Hrpcha every day and she is in fact going to be driving me to\ncourt on monday.\nWhat are your thoughts?\nThank you\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:49 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nAlright, I can file it into the court file and provide it as discovery to the prosecutor.\nHowever, if the case proceeds to trial, the court the court will want live testimony from fact witnesses.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:19 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file this into the record\nSean,\nUntil otherwise informed, I am still reliant on you and need you to file this onto the record into evidence please.\nThank you.\nGmail - Re: Please file this into the record 1/3/26, 12:15 PM\nStatement, voluntary, from passenger Gina\nDisability certification, for passenger Gina", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.768670", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "; crowe@seattletimes.com; cwinfrey@seattletimes.com;", "recipient_email": "questions@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Urgent Legal Case - Evidence of Government Misconduct [EXTERNAL]", "summary": "[EXTERNAL]\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon.", "body": "[EXTERNAL]\nI am facing false felony charges in Chelan County Superior Court (Case #2410025304) after reporting serious crimes by\ncounty officials who interfered with a 911 medical emergency call. Complete case details, evidence, and documentation:\nhttps://ryanhellfiles.com\nTrial is approaching soon. I desperately need legal representation or media attention.\nRyan Hell(267) 777-2344", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct_2.pdf", "filename": "email_RE-_Urgent_Legal_Case_-_Evidence_of_Government_Misconduct_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.674644", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Submission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nUnited States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Report successfully submitted\nYour record number is: 705740-PNG\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights violations, spot\ntrends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.", "body": "Submission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nUnited States Department of Justice\nCivil Rights Division\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division.\nReport successfully submitted\nYour record number is: 705740-PNG\nSave report\nWhat to expect\n1 We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil rights violations, spot\ntrends, and determine if we have authority to help with your report.\n2 Our specialists determine the next step\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the Justice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report. If so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your report and will\nrecommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid organization.\n3 When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not always be able to\nprovide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 1 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you provided in this report.\nDepending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you need to reach us about your report,\nplease refer to your report number when contacting us. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat you can do next\n1 Contact local legal aid organizations or a lawyer if you haven\u2019t already\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help you with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices), to help you find a legal aid lawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2 Get help immediately if you are in danger\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still experiencing physical\nharm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911 and contact the police.\nYour submission\nContact\nContact information\nYour name\nRyan Hell\nEmail address\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nPhone number\n+12677772344\nAddress\n11015 10th ave sw\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 2 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\n-\nSeattle, Washington 98144\nAre you now or have ever been an active duty service member?\nNo\nPrimary concern\nWhat is your primary reason for contacting the Civil Rights Division?\nSomething else happened\nLocation\nWhere did this happen?\nOrganization name\n350 Orondo Ave. Suite 501\nAddress\n-\n-\nWenatchee, Washington\nPersonal characteristics\nDo you believe any of these personal characteristics influenced why you were treated this way?\nDisability (including temporary or recovered and including HIV and drug addiction)\nFamily, marital, or parental status\nReligion\nOther reason\nDate\nWhen did this happen?\n1/26/2026\nPersonal description\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 3 of 4\nSubmission complete 1/26/26, 2:26 PM\nIn your own words, describe what happened\nrel to prior doj rept for kidnapping under color of law during 911 medical duress call in state park 4th july\n2024. Falsely charged to disappear me I fear... and the case is still going, today at trial readiness PD and\njudge said ready: I asserted ONGOING unanwered problems w/ court reporter present most of first year of\nproceedings, was same woman introduced as alleged vics mother at crime scene. Judge is redacting and\naltering docket ahs also removed evidence all w/o telling me. Changed judges names in docket history\nalso. Appointed FIVE attorneys in total now all have refused to engage, all quit, docket chabged on that\nalso. dashcam footage tampered I found using forensics tools. 3d manip, Ai tool micro alter easily see,\ncalled sheriff to report, that night atrny copied ovver, delet. I have screen shots. Judge has rebuked my\nmotiuon to preserve evidence and forensics for 16 MNTHS. A retrd VIP, chief pros, FLED crime scene as\nsheriffs waited. TODAY I ASSERTED THESE FACTS AGAIN and the judge said he is sending me to eastern\nstate. PLEASE HELP; this is a coordinated conspiracy to silence me for whistleblowing! I HAVE MOUN-\nTAINS of evidence at my ryanhellfacts . com This operation utilized a 911 system and its op manager, to\ndivert my duress call. Then the op man came disguised as a volunteer, then raced us out into another\ncanyon to an isolated home where my passengers and my phone did not work. We were held from 1PM\nwhen call 911 until my arrest for alleged thrts. I was punched int he head while thre op man held a gun over\nme. I NEVER faught I have a SOLID LAWSUIT so i just smiled waiited for deputies... the op man panicked\nafter the plan to incite a fight so he could shoot me dead failed i think. THE 911 companu is Rivercom 911\nand is part privately owned by sheriff and VIP's. Its an illegal intel operation and was used to facilitate an\nattmot MURDER. They let the op man go after 18 YEARS.. and the 911 company is finally moving OFF of\ncounty land too now. They JUST retired the coroner and he was not retuirement age, so I fear the worse,\nTODAY THE JUDGE ORDERED ME TO EASTERN STATE MENTAL EVAL just for saying the coiurt is railroad-\ning me and identifying the excessive evidence, in summary, which would clearly prove that. PLEAASE\nHELP. I AM NOIT GUYILTY OF ANYTHING EXCEPT LIFE SAVING PATIENCE AND DETERMINATION and\nadesperate cabal of corrupt and illegal lawmen and politicos are desperately attempting to bury me....\nEastern State mental hospital is a cess pool of death its in the news routinely over lawsuits now. I am ab-\nsolutley rational and sane and not on drugs. PLEASE HELP\nhttps://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Page 4 of 4\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/DoJ-705740-PNG_January_25_2026.pdf", "filename": "DoJ-705740-PNG_January_25_2026.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:23.133674", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nwww.sos.wa.gov/corporations\n03/03/2025\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the en\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve\nstatus.\nIn accordance with RCW23.95.605-610, the above en\u0000ty is hereby administra\u0000vely dissolved as of: 03/03/2025.\nThis ac\u0000on was taken due to failure of the en\u0000ty to file a required report within the \u0000me set forth by law.\nUnder RCW 23.95.615, a domes\u0000c en\u0000ty that is administra\u0000vely dissolved may apply for reinstatement no later than five (5)\nyears a\u0000er the effec\u0000ve date of administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on noted above. RCW 23.95.615 iden\u0000fies the requirements for an\napplica\u0000on for reinstatement.\nYou can access the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) online to reac\u0000vate your\nen\u0000ty using the following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corpora\u0000ons\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. This no\u0000ce is generated as part of\nan automated no\u0000fica\u0000on process.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/noticeofdisolutionSexretaryofStateWa.pdf", "filename": "noticeofdisolutionSexretaryofStateWa.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.518667", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a\ncouple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nRe: Ryan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after a\ncouple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a conflict\nof interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit murder.\nI\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask you to\ncarefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect everyone\nlikes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of July for\nthem. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was introduced to\nme and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the Stenographer. I\nattempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get her formal name.\nMOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL PROSECUTOR aND established\nSEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of become a political target OF; SALLY\nBAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What is more damnign; for the state; is I even\nhave photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by the alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the\ncops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t mean anything for me today or next month in\nmy jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and the incidents here are only indicators of a much\nbroader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July 4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic\nfriend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service aside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty\ndispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in their pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no\naid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000. I reminded driver it was unauthorized. He\nsurrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my truck. Without going on more the case argues\nthat Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill. Ryan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial\nappointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed and texted Justin Titus and never been able to\ncommunicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at least 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I\nhad to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with some preliminary discovery materials, which was the\npolice report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a proper working email. I have faith in my innocence and\nI was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail and clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good\nconscience for several decades. I have been proactive in obtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and\ndefense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing court clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout,\neach week to connect with council, Titus told him I had concerns about the duration of records being kept which would\nbe exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did not reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a\npersonal appearance in Chelan Superior some time earlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and\navailable and not destroyed. My concern, as I told Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by\ndispatchers based in the initial conversation on 911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or\nrequest any sort of roadside assistance for the flat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have\nfamiliarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and run my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for\ntech products throughout the state, for 7 years while attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of\none which is not going to take any gruff and I respect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something\nfrom a guy who is being charged after tactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what\nappeared to be a very elaborate effort to do me and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to\ncouncil where this matter would be best suited: I will present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and\ndetermine if this is a problem for this court. Again I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen\ninto some sort of destruction cross hairs by judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was\nbeing ousted for his earlier career in youth works and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a\ndisgusting string of predatory events namely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African\nAmerican descent. These allegations had been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and\nworkers. A substantial enough amount of this eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court\nhearing and a sworn judge took careful inventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of\nmolesting those kids and he was in fact every bit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed\nMurray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and he moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle.\nAccusations came out and Murray denied them. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a\nlot of cheering amongst many of us who had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for\njustice. And perseverance, the strong will the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the\nbad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that plaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was\nsomething we had a hard time with a lot of us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter\nsaid they had an anonymous tip who only said Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that\nhe was actually a molestor\u2026 and the case is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4\ndays. They asked me for advice. I simply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol\nrecords. Two days later the Murray lies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this\napply to our case? In the incident, as I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the\nhomeowners saying the police were gonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed\nonsite. I then heard a woman frantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some\nmen said back \u201cyou gotta go now just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing\nshe was yet another piece of evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named\n\u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a career politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career\ninvolves being a senior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed\nMurray and she had aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of\naccusers presented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally\nattempted to keep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad\ncoach, probably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending\nEd Murray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a disgusting\nvulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy creating\npolitical cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express stimulating\nthought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even mafia types.\nSo dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express our intended\nmessage. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between some things\nand it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my name tagged and\nharassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by professional contractors.\nThat FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat unfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my\nwife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work walking to her bus stop at Dash Point\nRoad near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She was robbed by a man who produced a\nhand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They never caught that man and a detective later\nsmirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and looked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are\nmoving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019. I\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep\nstate types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a desert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and\nphotos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we enjoyed the view, that there were people watching\nus. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had my own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both\nsides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting visitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a\nfire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all. Absolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the\nnight of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my license plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done\nsomeone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it. Then Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip\nover to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to try to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to\nexecute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and she is THE well established primary alpha protector of my\nprimarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since 2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of\nher before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a former SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen\nengaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate for me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change\nwho my biological parents were. But I can change the way the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\nHi Ryan,\nWe actually have court today. I am glad your phone is working. Are you able to come to court today?\nThe judge would like you here in person if possible. If not, I can try to get it moved until Wednesday or next Monday\nbut let me know what would work for you.\nThanks,\nOn Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:26 PM Ryan Hell wrote:\nI have a working phone again. I will try to call you tomorrow around 9am.\nRyan\n(267)777-2344\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg, 527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-\nD3D164A07FFC.jpeg, IMG_6448.jpeg, IMG_6452.jpeg\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Re-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.729657", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion_2.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.06, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.159650", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:53 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:53 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email. This is an unmonitored account.\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Please save your record\nnumber for tracking. Your record number is: 633568-CVL.\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still\nexperiencing physical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911\nand contact the police.\nWhat to Expect\n1. We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil\nrights violations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your\nreport.\n2. Our specialists determine the next steps\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the\nJustice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report.\nIf so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your\nreport and will recommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid\norganization.\n3. When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not\nalways be able to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you\nprovided in this report. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you\nneed to reach us about your report, please refer to your report number when contacting\nus. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat You Can Do Next\n1. Contact local legal aid organizations or a\nlawyer if you haven\u2019t already.\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help\nyou with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices),to help you find a legal aid\nlawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2. Learn More\nVisit civilrights.justice.gov to learn more about your rights and see examples of\nviolations we handle.\nPlease Note: Each week, we receive hundreds of reports of potential violations. We\ncollect and analyze this information to help us select cases, and we may use this\ninformation as evidence in an existing case. We will review your letter to decide\nwhether it is necessary to contact you for additional information. We do not have the\nresources to follow-up on every letter.\nContact\ncivilrights.justice.gov U.S. Department of (202) 514-3847\nJustice 1-855-856-1247 (toll-free)\nCivil Rights Division Telephone Device for the\n950 Pennsylvania Deaf\nAvenue, NW (TTY) (202) 514-0716\nWashington, D.C.\n20530-0001\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division_2.pdf", "filename": "email_Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.253652", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Chelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nComplaint-25- CAD Incident\nLanguage English Complaint # 2410025304\n00031 #\nDate of Time of\n12/15/25 1152\nComplaint Complaint\nIndividual Filing the Complaint (Ryan Hell)\nEnter your personal information so we may contact you directly if our investigators have any additional\nquestions and to notify you upon completion of our investigation. You may remain anonymous by checking the appropriate checkbox if you wish, however, we will have\nno means to notify you of the outcome of the investigation.", "body": "Chelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nComplaint-25- CAD Incident\nLanguage English Complaint # 2410025304\n00031 #\nDate of Time of\n12/15/25 1152\nComplaint Complaint\nIndividual Filing the Complaint (Ryan Hell)\nEnter your personal information so we may contact you directly if our investigators have any additional\nquestions and to notify you upon completion of our investigation.\nYou may remain anonymous by checking the appropriate checkbox if you wish, however, we will have\nno means to notify you of the outcome of the investigation. If you complete this form on behalf of\nanother, please provide your information in addition to the individual's information on whose behalf you\nsubmitting this complaint.\nComplainant is a\nNo\nminor/needs help.\nI want to remain\nanonymous.\nFirst Name Ryan Middle Name Michael Last Name Hell\n11015 10th ave\nAddress City Seattle State WA\nsw\n267-777-2344 267-777-2344\nZip 98144 Home phone Cell phone\nx_____ x_____\nryanbrooklyn202\nAdditional phone Email Additional Email\n0@gmail.com\nDate of Birth 01/09/78 Age 47 Race White\nDriver\u2019s License\nGender Male WDL686B5123B Disability No\n#\nPrimary Are you able to\nBest time to\nanytime Language English communicate in Yes\ncontact?\nSpoken English?\nArrested? Yes Citation Number 2410025304\nInjury Information\nWas complainant\ninjured during the Yes\nincident?\nDid you seek\nType of Injury Unknown Severity of Injury Unknown medical Yes\nattention?\nDoctor Information\nDoctor\u2019s Name Doctor\u2019s Phone\nAttorney Information\nAttorney's Name Attorney's Phone\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 1 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nEmployee ( )\nPlease enter any information of the employee(s) who you are complaining on. if you do not know the\ninvolved employee's name or ID number, please describe them as best as possible as this will assist\nthe Department in identifying the employee.\nEmployee Information\nEmployee #\nFirst name Middle name Last name\nAge Race Gender\nIn Uniform\nDescription of\nEmployee\nVehicle Information\nVehicle Make Vehicle Model Vehicle Color\nVehicle\nVehicle Number\nCharacteristics\nIncident\nDate of Incident\nDate of Incident Day of Incident Time of Incident\nIncident Location\nAddress City State\nZip\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 2 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\nEVIDENCE OF INTENTIONAL ALTERED AND TAMPERED SHERIFFS DASH CAM FOOTAGE\nOn July 4th 2024 myself and a DISABLED passenger were legally camping in a DESIGNATED\nDiscovery Campground on 3rd of July, with her companion dogs. We found ourselves\nsrtranded due to flat tires and my passenger informed me then that she had not brought\nher insulin. I spent nearly 6 hours desperartely racing to get us out of the deseert\nenvironment back to road saftey and cell service and ultimately became stuck. I called\n911 and was told no help woul;d come and my only choice was to allow volunteers to\ntake us to a house to meet an ambulance. Some 45 minutes later a truck with man and\nwoman arrive and oidentified themselves as volunteers and they raced past the turn off\nfor wenatchee and toojk us further into another isolated area to a remote house where\nthey held us eventuially seperated us, had someone steal my truck then show uop\nDRIVING it dem,anding CASH, later they demanded cash also.\nIncident Description\nI WAS ASSAULTED. NO AMBULANCE EVER CAME. ARRESTED ON FALSE CHARGES. TRUCK\nRELEASED TO PASSENGER.\nDeputies lied abnout tow truck name I can prove that also.\nThe tow present and in photos and video was B&T towing of cashmere wa, and that\ncompany was out of business. Further, in the sheriff video Jeremaiah Johnson of Rivercom\nwho effectively is the kidnapper, in legal terms, who dressed in disguise then misled us\nand took us to this property where he and the out of busienss tow truck attempted to\nextort me for cash for a tow / repair, and later for a \"rescue\", Jermeiah admitted to the\nsheriff dfeputy ON VIDEO that he called B&T Towing. TH edeputy was aware yet he falsely\nreported Mountain View Towing was there.\nMy biggest immediate problem I demand answers to are the AI tampered videos.\nSupporting\nPhoto\nDocumentation\nAttachment(s) supporting complaint:\nFile Name Size Date\nAdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27\n3028 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n2947092forensicanalysis\nZachBrunner_202407041759_1310_6764\n3033 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n26832forensicanalysis\nAdamMusgrove_202407041734_1274_27\n3039 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n294709___unkmnownVERforensicanalysis\nZachBrunner_202407041759_1310_6764\n3033 12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\n26832forensicanalysis\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 3 Of 4\nChelan County Sheriff's Office\nComplaint #\nComplaint-25-00031\n12/15/2025, 12:11 PM\nLEFTA Systems - 27 Page 4 Of 4\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Chelan-County-Online-Complaint-25-00031.pdf", "filename": "email_Chelan-County-Online-Complaint-25-00031.pdf", "size_mb": 0.48, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.675657", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Search Search \u2192\nBills, meetings, and session \uf078 State laws and rules \uf078 Learn and participate \uf078 Legislators \uf078 About the Legislature \uf078\nHome / State laws and rules / WACs / Title 204 / Chapter 204-91A / Section 204-91A-180 Print\n204-91A-170 << 204-91A-180 >> End of Chapter\nWAC 204-91A-180\nPDF Agency filings affecting this section\nAdditional Towing and Tow Operator Qualifications,\nRestrictions, and Requirements. In addition to the requirements contained in WAC 204-91A-170, registered tow truck operators appointed pursuant to this chapter must conform to all laws\nand administrative rules pertaining to the tow industry and must observe the following practices and procedures:\n(1) When called by the patrol during normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck, from within the assigned zone within five minutes after\nreceiving the call.", "body": "Search Search \u2192\nBills, meetings, and session \uf078 State laws and rules \uf078 Learn and participate \uf078 Legislators \uf078 About the Legislature \uf078\nHome / State laws and rules / WACs / Title 204 / Chapter 204-91A / Section 204-91A-180 Print\n204-91A-170 << 204-91A-180 >> End of Chapter\nWAC 204-91A-180\nPDF Agency filings affecting this section\nAdditional Towing and Tow Operator Qualifications,\nRestrictions, and Requirements.\nIn addition to the requirements contained in WAC 204-91A-170, registered tow truck operators appointed pursuant to this chapter must conform to all laws\nand administrative rules pertaining to the tow industry and must observe the following practices and procedures:\n(1) When called by the patrol during normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck, from within the assigned zone within five minutes after\nreceiving the call. Tow trucks must be registered to and belong to the particular tow business that is called and assigned only to that tow zone. If an officer at the scene\ndeems it necessary, the officer may authorize additional assistance from a registered tow operator outside of the tow zone.\n(2) When called by the patrol after normal business hours, the tow operator must dispatch a tow truck from within the assigned zone within fifteen minutes after\nreceiving the call.\n(3) The tow truck that is dispatched must arrive at the stated location within a reasonable time considering distance, traffic, and weather conditions.\n(4) If for any reason a tow operator is unable to dispatch a tow truck within the stated time or if the dispatched truck will be delayed for any reason, the tow\noperator must advise the patrol stating the reason and estimated time of arrival. In the event the tow truck fails to arrive at the scene within a reasonable time, the\npatrol will contact another tow operator to respond to the scene and will cancel the original tow.\n(5) A tow operator on rotation who is unable to dispatch or arrive within the times stated in subsections (1), (2), (3), and (4) of this section will forfeit the tow\noperator's turn and be placed at the bottom of the rotation list as if the tow operator had responded.\n(6) Repeated refusal or failure of the appointee to respond to calls from the patrol for towing services or to provide the requested services may result in the\nsuspension or revocation of the tow operator's letter of appointment.\n(7) If the tow operator will be unavailable for twenty-four hours or more to respond to rotational calls with a class \"A,\" \"B,\" or \"C\" tow truck, the tow operator\nmust advise the appropriate patrol office. Unavailability may occur due to conditions including, but not limited to, other tow truck commitments, tow truck disabled\nand/or under repair, unforeseen driver shortage due to illness. The tow operator must give the reason for unavailability and the approximate date and time when the\ncompany will be available to respond to calls.\nThe tow company will be removed from the rotational list and will not be called until the tow operator advises the patrol that the company is once again able to\nrespond to calls with an \"A,\" \"B,\" or \"C\" class truck. In all such cases, the tow company will resume its normal position on the rotational list without regard to any missed\ncalls or its position prior to being unavailable.\n(8) The tow operator must advise the patrol whenever a private call is received for a tow with circumstances that indicate that the tow is for a vehicle that has\nbeen involved in a collision, incident, or equipment breakdown on the public roadway. The tow operator also must advise the patrol of all private calls to motor vehicle\ncollisions on private property resulting in bodily injury or death.\n(9) The tow operator must notify the patrol before moving any vehicle involved in a collision on a public highway under the jurisdiction of the patrol as defined in\nthe motor vehicle code, Title 46 RCW, or where it appears that the driver of the vehicle to be moved is under the influence of intoxicants or drugs, or is otherwise\nincapacitated.\n(10) Other than a service patrol established and funded by the department of transportation, a tow operator must not solicit tow or roadside services by\npatrolling the public roadways searching for disabled vehicles or vehicles involved in a traffic collision.\n(11) When the patrol is in charge of a collision scene or other such incident, a tow operator must not respond to such scene unless his services have been\nspecifically requested by the patrol, the vehicle's owner or operator, or the owner's authorized representative.\n(12) The tow operator must be available, or will ensure that specific employees are available, twenty-four hours a day for the purpose of receiving calls or\narranging for the release of vehicles. Business hours will be posted conspicuously at the tow operator's place of business so they can be seen during business hours and\nnonbusiness hours. A copy must also be sent to the inspector of the district in which the tow operator does business. Changes of business hours must be sent to the\ndepartment and the inspector ten days before their effective date.\n(13) The tow operator must post a current copy of tow and storage rates, on a form approved by the department and the patrol, in the following locations:\n(a) At the entrance to the place of business, in a conspicuous location, plainly visible and capable of being read by the public, whether the business is open or\nclosed. If, in order to meet this requirement, the rate sheets must be placed in a location, exposed to the elements, they must be protected so as to remain legible.\n(b) Inside the business location, where business is commonly transacted. The rate sheets must be posted in such manner as to be clearly and plainly visible and\nread at all times by customers of the business.\n(c) A copy of the current rates will be sent to the department, the section, and the patrol district commander of the district in which the tow operator has applied\nfor a letter of appointment. Notice of any change(s) in service rates will be forwarded to the department, the section, and the district commander of the area ten days\nbefore the effective date of the changes. Charges made for towing services arising from calls initiated by the patrol must be consistent with current posted towing\nrates and must be based only upon services listed on the prescribed form.\n(d) In the event that a tow operator has only a class \"B\" truck and utilizes it for class \"A\" and \"B\" type tows, the tow operator must file a rate sheet that specifies\nthe rates charged for the different types of tows.\n(e) Whenever any tow operator utilizes a larger truck than the towed vehicle warrants, the tow operator must charge fees based on the size of the towed vehicle\nnot the size of the truck used.\n(14) Charges made for towing services arising from calls initiated by the patrol must not exceed the maximum rates established by the chief.\n(15) Unless other arrangements are made with commissioned patrol personnel at the scene, all impounded vehicles must be taken to the tow operators nearest\napproved storage location within the tow operator's assigned tow zone.\n(16) The tow operator will maintain, for three years, records on towed and released vehicles which were towed at the request of the patrol. Such records will be\navailable for inspection by the patrol during normal business hours at the tow operator's place of business. Records will include, but not be limited to:\n(a) An itemized receipt of all charges for the services provided.\n(b) A tow impound record inventory or copy thereof made out by the trooper at the scene of the tow and signed by the tow operator.\n(c) All other records required by the department.\n(17) The first and last name of the tow truck driver will be placed on the tow impound inventory record made out by the patrol officer at the scene and the officer\nmay verify their driver's license; except that the signature may be provided on existing forms with form number 3000-110-076 (R 7/11) until current stock is depleted.\n(18) Tow operators must obtain and maintain a current registration certificate as required by RCW 46.55.020.\n(19) Tow operators must perform towing tasks competently. The standard of competence will be that quality of work which is accepted as efficient and effective\nwithin the towing industry. The tow operator must ensure tow truck drivers responding to calls initiated by the patrol have completed a minimum of one four-hour tow\ntruck driver training course every five years. The tow operator must keep a file documenting training.\n(20) No tow operator, employee, or agent will misappropriate, wrongfully convert to his/her own use, or abuse property belonging to another and entrusted to\nhis/her care or storage.\n(21) Tow operators must use emergency lights to warn other motorists only when at the scene of collisions, disabled vehicles, and/or recoveries. Such lighting\nmust not be used when traveling to or from the scene.\n(22) Tow operators are required to clean collision/incident scenes of all vehicle glass, debris, and vehicle liquid spills of one gallon or less.\n(23) Specific operating restrictions and/or requirements, by truck class, are as follows:\n(a) The standard air brake release tools (caging stud assemblies) required to be carried in the class \"B,\" \"B-2,\" and \"C\" trucks must be used, whenever necessary,\nto preserve potential evidence involving brake equipment or adjustment settings. When a tow operator is attempting to move a vehicle equipped with locked spring\nparking brakes that cannot be released by external air supply, the caging assemblies must be used to release the brake tension. Under no circumstances will the towed\nvehicle's brake assemblies or adjustments be moved or disturbed in any way that will prevent later determination of the precollision or incident settings.\n(b) Class \"B\" or \"B-2\" trucks in excess of twenty-three thousand pounds gross vehicle weight rating need not carry dollies when towing or recovering heavy\nvehicles.\n(24) Whenever a \"special event or overflow\" storage lot is approved by the department, the patrol and appropriate city/county jurisdictions, the following must\napply:\n(a) The tow operator must maintain personnel at the lot twenty-four hours per day for security and vehicle and/or personal property release. If necessary,\nreimbursement for such labor must be part of the contract for the \"special event\" if appropriate or by amended storage rates with a waiver of the ten-day rate change\nnotice requirement approved by the department and the patrol.\n(b) At the conclusion of a \"special event or overflow\" situation, all vehicles not reclaimed by the vehicle's owner or the owner's authorized representative must\nbe towed to the tow operator's regular storage facility and processed in the normal fashion. No additional fee must be charged for towing the vehicle from the\noverflow lot to the regular storage facility.\n(25) All work performed by the tow operator and/or employee must be in the most professional and expeditious manner. Tow operators and employees must\nrefrain from any unprofessional actions while towing for or conducting towing business at the request of the patrol. The actions include, but are not limited to, any of\nthe following:\n(a) Lack of service, selective service, or refusal to provide service which the tow operator should be capable of performing;\n(b) Exhibiting any signs of either alcohol, drug use, or both;\n(c) Displaying any objects, logos, slogans, or graphic material within the view of the public that contains any form of pornography, profanity, or prejudice toward\nany person or group of persons; and\n(d) Directing toward a vehicle's owner, operator or the owner's authorized representative any profanity or slurs based on the person's culture, race, gender or\nsexual preference.\n(26) Tow operators must, when required by the patrol or the department, cause to be displayed on each approved truck, decals indicating truck class, patrol\ndistrict, and/or assigned tow zone.\n(27) When responding to a patrol call, tow truck driver must wear clothing identifying the company and the driver's first name. The driver's first name is the first\nname used on the person's driver's license or a nickname that the person commonly uses and by which the person is commonly known.\n(28) Tow truck drivers performing recovery, impounding, or towing must wear work vests of highly visible materials, or equivalent distinguishing apparel when\noutside of the towing vehicle as outlined in WAC 296-155-200(5) and Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23 Part 634.3.\n(29) Tow operators must not display any sign, shield, marking, accessory, or insignia on uniforms or vehicles indicating the equipment or vehicle marking are\nsimilar to or belong to any public law enforcement agency. Tow operators must not engage in any advertisement indicating an official connection with the patrol or\nother law enforcement agency.\n[Statutory Authority: RCW 46.55.115. WSR 17-10-029, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 4/26/17, effective 5/27/17. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005, 46.55.050, and\n46.55.115. WSR 13-18-065, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 9/3/13, effective 10/4/13. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.55.050, 46.55.115, and 46.55.075. WSR 13-11-112, \u00a7 204-\n91A-180, filed 5/21/13, effective 6/21/13. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005, 46.55.050, and 46.55.115. WSR 09-09-118, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 4/21/09, effective\n5/22/09. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005 and 46.55.115. WSR 07-02-025A, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 12/22/06, effective 1/22/07. Statutory Authority: RCW\n46.37.005, 46.55.050, and 46.55.115. WSR 02-07-056, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 3/15/02, effective 4/15/02. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.37.005 and 46.55.050. WSR\n94-18-083, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 9/2/94, effective 10/3/94. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.61.567. WSR 89-21-044, \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 10/13/89, effective\n11/13/89. Statutory Authority: RCW 46.35.005 [46.37.005]. WSR 89-14-015 (Order 89-04-ESR), \u00a7 204-91A-180, filed 6/23/89.]\nStudies, audits, and reports Accessibility\nPerformance audits Jobs\nLegislative questions or comments\nActuarial reporting Public records requests\nCall the Legislative Hotline\n1-800-562-6000 Transportation studies and Site help\nreports\nTTY for deaf/hard of hearing: 1-800-833-6388\nContact us\nReports from outside\nLearn more about the Legislative Hotline\norganizations Email updates (GovDelivery)\nInvestigation reports\nDisclaimer Privacy Notice \u00a9 Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/WAC 204-91A-180.pdf", "filename": "WAC 204-91A-180.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.551667", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs! UBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024.", "body": "Corporations and Charities Division\nPhysical/Overnight address:\n801 Capitol Way S\nOlympia, WA 98501-1226\nMailing address:\nPO Box 40234\nOlympia, WA 98504-0234\nTel: 360.725.0377\nsos.wa.gov/corps\n11/01/2024\nB&T TOWING LLC\nBRANDON HUNTINGTON\n9933 SCHOOL ST\nPESHASTIN WA 98847-9739\nDELINQUENT ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE\nGree\u0000ngs!\nUBI #: 604 973 377\nEn\u0000ty Name: B&T TOWING LLC\nThe above listed en\u0000ty has not filed its annual report that was due on 10/31/2024. As a result, the above listed\nen\u0000ty is no longer in ac\u0000ve status.\nFailure to file the necessary report by 02/28/2025 will result in administra\u0000ve dissolu\u0000on or termina\u0000on of your\nregistra\u0000on.\nPlease verify the registered agent informa\u0000on is correct, including email address and update as needed.\nYou can file online using the Washington Secretary of State, Corpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Filing System (CCFS) using\nthe following website h\u0000ps://www.sos.wa.gov/corps\nSincerely,\nWashington Secretary of State\nCorpora\u0000ons and Chari\u0000es Division\ncorps@sos.wa.gov\nNote: If your documents were recently submi\u0000ed, please disregard this no\u0000ce. If you have any ques\u0000ons concerning\nthis ma\u0000er please contact our office at the address or phone number shown above.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/FD7D01CF-0A36-47F6-8FA3-E505BCAE556A.pdf", "filename": "FD7D01CF-0A36-47F6-8FA3-E505BCAE556A.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.570668", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah, and\nalso known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her status\nas an employee of rivercom in order to provide context.", "body": "I want to file a Brady motion on the matter of the female dispatcher or otherwise known as the spouse of Jeremiah, and\nalso known in the court documents and police report as the female alleged victim. I must have confirmation of her status\nas an employee of rivercom in order to provide context. Simple as that. The arresting deputy already confirmed to me\nbut the record oddly doesn\u2019t exist in the court documents everywhere and it harms my chance to prove wrong doing\nand expose the inaccuracies of the prosecution. This woman is believed to be the person fielding all calls contrary to the\nclaim of several different dispatchers having flelded this call.\nI appreciate your response and wholeheartedly apologize for all the added work but this is cornerstone piece of my\ndefense.\nOn Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:07 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\n1) The state has been ordered to provide evidence about Jeremiah Johnson's employment already.\nI've asked the investigator to do a public records request on the wife. At this point, I do not know\nthat she works or worked for Rivercom. I agree that this is relevant and worth pursuing. At this\npoint, I have really no reason to suspect that she works for Rivercom beyond your assertion. If\nthe records reveal something different, I will follow up.\n2) I understand you are asserting the CAD calls have been altered. However, I do not see any\nsigns of alteration. Nonetheless, the state has been ordered to provide the metadata for the 911\ncall.\n3) If you want a new attorney, that is fine, but my guess it you are going to run into the same issues\nwith anyone else. I'll go through some options here, because you seem to believe that I am\nrequired to file and sign whatever motions you want and to pursue whatever strategy you want,\nwhich is incorrect. If you want to pursue your own legal strategy and file your own motions, you\nmay want to represent yourself. You can also ask for \"stand-by counsel\" where the attorney just\nhelps you with your own case, but for most intents and purposes, you represent yourself. You\nwill be held to the same standards and rules as an attorney in many respects. If you proceed to\ntrial as your own counsel, you will be expected to understand the court rules and rules of\nevidence as well. While I am sure most people would advise against anyone representing\nthemselves, this is probably going to be the only way you can pursue your case in the way that\nyou want and file whatever motions you want. I assume if you changed your mind at some point\nprior to trial/readiness, the court could appoint counsel.\n4) No one else in the court had trouble hearing me. You are free to come to court in person if you\nwish. We have been asking for Zoom to save you the time and cost of traveling back and forth to\nChelan County, which I know is a major burden. In terms of who is gaslighting who, you can look\nat your own e-mail from June 1, 2025 at 2:24 am which says under \"Motion to Preserve\nEvidence and Address Potential Spoliation\" paragraph 5 that one of the records are to preserve\n\"Records confirming the employment status of the alleged victims as Rivercom 911 dispatchers,\nnot private citizens or firefighters, to expose potential bias or misconduct.\" The bias piece is\nrelevant to your case and again, the judge ordered the state to provide this information with\nrespect to Jeremiah Johnson. If records or interviews lead to information that the other people,\nthat could be presented to the court to obtain a further order with respect to discovery. Even if\nyou had not brought it up, that is something that I would pursue on my own due to the fact that I\nbelieve it is relevant.\n5) I think there can be a lot of favoritism in a small town for sure. I do not disagree with you there. I\nthink there are signs/evidence of that in the video themselves. One of the police is very cordial\nwith the 911 dispatcher.\n6) Where we have a disagreement is that you seem to think the videos and 911 calls are edited\nwhereas I do not. I am taking them at face value. You might even be correct about that the call\nwas mishandled. I have already acknowledged that it is unusual that the response was to send\nan off-duty dispatcher to take you to his property and there is perhaps a civil claim to be filed\nthere as well. Where we again diverge is that you think this was some sort of malicious trick to\nget a tow truck involved to try and get $1000 dollars from you that would presumably get paid to\nthe tow company. And after failing, they offered to just basically to just leave after getting this tire\nback. I am not disputing that a tow truck company was called. We can even take the position that\nyou did not want or ask for the tow and certainly did not agree to a $1,000 bill.\n7) You will need to clarify what you are saying I said about the tow company. Their business\nregistration is a public record. I have the business filings for B&T and Mountain Highway Towing.\nThe \"governor\" of B&T is listed as Brandon Huntington. The governor of Mountain Towing is\nlisted as \"Amy Hendrickson.\"\n8) I am fine with working on a timeline.\nUltimately, this is where we are at. Again, I do not believe that the videos or 911 calls are altered. We\nwill see what metadata they provide. The reality is that the government warehouses all this information.\nTampering with evidence is a crime, public records act violations have led to large payouts (although\nthis would be a civil claim), perjury is a crime, making a false statement and false reporting are crimes.\nThere are also other civil torts that are available. To be clear, I am not a prosecutor and have no ability\nto charge crimes. The judge also has no ability to charge crimes. The only people who can charge a\nfelony are prosecutors. So, the entire system is that regard, is based in trust on prosecutors and\ngovernments to do the right thing and not lie and not tamper with, or destroy, evidence. Certainly,\ndespite that there are situations where they have destroyed evidence or set people up. I just do not\nsee that in this case. In those cases, it is usually a rogue individual or several poeple, typically police,\nworking outsides the confines in the law and trying to cover it up. It is not generally a multi-agency\ncoverup, which in this case would need to involve, at a minimum, multiple police, a person or persons\nwho can edit the videos, Rivercom, also someone who can edit the data there, and the tow truck\ncompany. They would need to all be willing to lie and put their careers and freedom (as these would all\nbe clearly criminal acts) at risk in order to extort you for a $1,000 tow bill. I really just do not see that\nhappening. Also, despite the willingness to openly tamper with multiple forms of evidence, they did not\nbother to actually clearly frame you for any crime. The evidence at trial regarding the alleged threats\nthemselves will have to come from their testimony.\nIf, in fact, they are editing and deleting data, it seems unlikely they will preserve and send evidence\nthat they are doing that. They clearly would not care about some court order if they do not care about\nlaws already.\nI am not sure what you are saying is complicated about the Rivercom 911 public records request\nprocess. It does require making an account if you do it online: https://rivercom911.govqa.us/\nWEBAPP/_rs/(S(3331cc1zbinheja0elnymhqj))/supporthome.aspx\nYou can also submit a paper request: https://rivercom911.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/\nrequest_for_public_records.pdf\nI assume you could also just e-mail them and use the same information as in the paper request\n(although I have only tried the other two ways): publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org\nDespite your belief, the videos on the dropbox are, in fact, the exact same that we watched together.\nThey are both continuous videos. The cop talks to the tow people at roughly 41 minutes into the video\nwith Adam Musgrove in the title (front facing version). The discussion between you and them where\nthey say they do not care about the bill any further is in the cell phone videos as well.\nLike you, my time is limited, and I do not have time to chase down every theory that someone has. If\nyou want to focus on a timeline, based on actual evidence that we have, that is fine and we can do\nthat.\nAgain, as I see it, the possible defenses are (1) no threat was made at all, (2) you said something that\nwas misconstrued as a gun or shooting someone, (3) you did say it and it was in defense of your car,\n(4) you did say it and it was just blowing off steam (trying to argue not a true threat), and (5) you did\nsay it but it was not not perceived by them as an actual threat (a different version of not a true threat).\nIf the case goes to trial, this will need to get figured out unless you go a different direction.\nThose options again are (1) you can represent yourself with stand-by counsel, (2) you can represent\nyourself without stand-by counsel, (3) you can ask for a new attorney.\nIf I remain on the case, I am going to treat it like any other case and pursue the defense that I think\nhave an actual chance of succeeding based off the evidence that we have and the law as it is written\nand defined by case law. As I am appointed on the case, I cannot simply withdraw from the case and\nthe option of how to proceed given those three options is up to you. I can request a court hearing for\nnext week if you want to request new counsel or to represent yourself.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 4:55 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nI\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for rivercom\n911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked for\nrivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it doesn\u2019t\ncontain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke to had\nflatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and she\npersisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are\nabsolutely aware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively\ndismissed then detail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this lady\nas a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally laughed\nand said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a trick\nto get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for help.\nThis constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT STANS\nMOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys are LYING\nabout the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s everyone\u2019s\noops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill dispute and\nsubsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and on the\nrecord please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter\nthe timeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And\nthe implication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they\nuse, if they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS\nshould have been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company\nfabricated the threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it\nstands, this seems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\"\nas well since the alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument\ncould be make that they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still\nseems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state\nhas proven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is\nsome actual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also\nneed to keep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but\nyou is claiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they\nkept in the wife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical\nand think it is just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy\nit.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Please_file_for_reconsideration_on_my_preservation_motion.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.610656", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Pam Faircloth", "sender_email": "Pam.Faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "publicdisclosure", "recipient_email": "publicdisclosure@rivercom911.org", "date_sent": "Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM", "subject": "Ryan Hell/24-1-00253-04 Hello,", "summary": "Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM\nAttachments: image002.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 1.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 2.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 3.png\nExternal Email Warning! This email originated from outside of Chelan County.", "body": "Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:35:40 AM\nAttachments: image002.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 1.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 2.png\n24C06401 Audio METADATA 3.png\nExternal Email Warning! This email originated from outside of Chelan County.\nGood Morning Pam,\nHere is the information I can best give you for the attached court order:\nJeremiah Johnson is the Operations Manager of RiverCom 911. Jeremiah began employment in March\n2008 as an Emergency Systems Dispatcher, was promoted to Supervisor in July 2011, then an internal\ntransfer to Radio Systems Technician in June 2017, with his current promotion of Operation Manager in\nJune 2022. Due to Jeremiah\u2019s long standing employment with RiverCom 911, he has a professional\nrelationship with many law enforcement officers but no personal relationships to our knowledge.\nCAD Call logs contain no metadata, RiverCom has confirmed this with the Spillman.\nAttached is the metadata for the 911 audio.\nPlease let me know if you need anything else.\nThank you,\nFrom: Pam Faircloth \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:35 PM\nTo: publicdisclosure \nSubject: Ryan Hell/24-1-00253-04\nHello,\nAttached is the order that we talked about on the phone with regard to what the court ordered our office to\nobtain from your office. As you can see, this order is requesting any additional information on Jeremiah Johnson\u2019s\nemployment with Rivercom and any relationship with law enforcement. The order also states that my office is to\nprovide any metadata with respect to the 911 calls and the CAD log.\nThank you very much for your help.\nPamela L. Faircloth\nParalegal - Felony Division\nChelan County Prosecutors Office\n(509) 667-6659 \u2013 phone\n(509) 667-6490 - fax\npam.faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us\nChelan County blocks all foreign email traffic. If you use Gmail as your email service and I don\u2019t respond to your email in a timely\nmanner, it is highly likely I did not receive your email. Please call me for an alternate way of corresponding.\nConfidentiality Notice: This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. Unless you\nare the intended addressee (or authorized to receive for the intended addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to\nanyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please\nadvise the sender by reply at pam.faircloth@co.chelan.wa.us and delete the message. In addition, all email sent to this\naddress will be received by the Chelan County email system and may be subject to public disclosure and to archiving\nand review.\u201d", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_JohsonsEmploymentStatus-HR-Rivercom.pdf", "filename": "email_JohsonsEmploymentStatus-HR-Rivercom.pdf", "size_mb": 0.41, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.571655", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Re: State's response to motion Sean,", "summary": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call.", "body": "Sean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\n1 of 2 1/24/26, 2:34 PM\nGmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally\nprivileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that\nany unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies\nof the original message.\n2 of 2 1/24/26, 2:34 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_RyansResponseToSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_RyansResponseToSeanEstworthy-June-17-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.079649", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "CHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nRYAN MICHAEL HELL \u00a7 Location: Chelan\n\u00a7 Filed on: 07/05/2024\n\u00a7 JIS/SCOMIS Case Number: 24-1-00253-8\n\u00a7 Process or Transaction wa0400000100646167\n\u00a7 Control Number:\n\u00a7\nCASE INFORMATION\nOffense Statute Deg Date Case Type: ADL Criminal Adult\n1.", "body": "CHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nRYAN MICHAEL HELL \u00a7 Location: Chelan\n\u00a7 Filed on: 07/05/2024\n\u00a7 JIS/SCOMIS Case Number: 24-1-00253-8\n\u00a7 Process or Transaction wa0400000100646167\n\u00a7 Control Number:\n\u00a7\nCASE INFORMATION\nOffense Statute Deg Date Case Type: ADL Criminal Adult\n1. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii) Case Flags: Speedy Trial Expiration Date\nBodily Injury\nCount #: 1\n2. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii)\nBodily Injury\n3. Harassment Threaten to Kill/Bodily Injury 9A.46.020(2)(b) FC 07/04/2024\nAddtl Statutes: (DE) Harassment Threaten (ii)\nBodily Injury\nWarrants\nBench Warrant - HELL, RYAN MICHAEL (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E )\n02/24/2025 4:57 PM Sheriff's Return of Bench Warrant\n02/10/2025 11:50 AM Issued Bench Warrant\n02/10/2025 10:44 AM Ordered Bench Warrant\nFine: $0\nBond Set: No Bail\nDATE CASE ASSIGNMENT\nCurrent Case Assignment\nCase Number 24-1-00253-04\nCourt Chelan\nDate Assigned 07/05/2024\nPARTY INFORMATION\nAttorneys\nPlaintiff STATE OF WASHINGTON Munneke, Michael Henry\n(Criminal) 509-667-6202(W)\nDefendant (WIP) HELL, RYAN MICHAEL\nDATE EVENTS & ORDERSOFTHE COURT INDEX\nEVENTS\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance Findings and Order\nIndex # 1\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Probable Cause\nIndex # 2\n07/05/2024 Order Establishing Conditions of Release\nIndex # 3\n07/05/2024 Order for Protection From Civil Harassment\nIndex # 4\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance\nIndex # 5\nPAGE 1 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n07/05/2024 Receipts\nIndex # 6\nCHELAN COUNTY SHERIFF\n07/05/2024 Affidavit of Indigency\nIndex # 7.99\n07/05/2024 Report\nIndex # 8.99\nCOURT'S RISK ASSESSMENT\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 9.99\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 10.99\n07/05/2024 Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 11.99\n07/09/2024 Notice of Appearance and Request for Discovery\nIndex # 12\n07/09/2024 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 13\n07/09/2024 Information\nIndex # 14\n07/17/2024 Acknowledgement of Advice of Rights\nIndex # 15\n07/17/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 16\n07/17/2024 Initial Arraignment\nIndex # 17\n07/22/2024 Order\nIndex # 18\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL\n07/22/2024 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 19\n07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 20\n07/29/2024 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 21\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Application of Prosecuting Attorney\nIndex # 22\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Application by Defendant\nIndex # 23\n09/04/2024 Omnibus Hearing\nIndex # 24\n09/23/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 25\n09/23/2024 StatusConference / Hearing\nIndex # 26\n09/30/2024 Hearing Cancelled Plaintiff Prosecution Requested\nIndex # 27\nPAGE 2 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n11/18/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 28\n11/18/2024 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 29\n02/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 30\n02/10/2025 Order Directing Issuance of Bench Warrant\nIndex # 31\n02/10/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 32\n02/10/2025 Bench Warrant Issued Copy Filed\nIndex # 33\n02/24/2025 Sheriffs Return on a Bench Warrant\nIndex # 34\n02/25/2025 Order Setting Bail\nIndex # 35\nPR\nAmount: 0.00\n02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing\nIndex # 36\n02/25/2025 Report\nIndex # 37.99\nCOURT'S RISK ASSESSMENT\n02/27/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 38\n03/05/2025 Attachment\nIndex # 39\nPICTURES PROVIDED BY DEF\n03/05/2025 Order\nIndex # 40\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL AND TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL\n03/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 41\n03/17/2025 Notice of Appearance\nIndex # 42\n03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 43\n03/17/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 44\n04/23/2025 Motion and Affidavit Declaration\nIndex # 45\nTO APPOINT PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR AT PUBLIC EXPENSE\n04/23/2025 Order for Expert Services\nIndex # 46\n05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\nIndex # 47\n05/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 48\n05/28/2025\nPAGE 3 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\nMotion\nIndex # 49\nTO PROVIDE DISCOVERY TO CLIENT\n06/02/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 50\n06/02/2025 Motion\nIndex # 51\nTO PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/02/2025 Order\nIndex # 52\nTO DISSEMINATE DISCOVERY\n06/02/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 53\n06/12/2025 Response\nIndex # 54\nSTATE'S TO DEF'S MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/16/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 55\n06/20/2025 Response\nIndex # 56\nDEF'S RE DISCOVERY AND EVIDENCE PRESERVATION\n06/23/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 57\n06/25/2025 Order\nIndex # 58\nON DISCOVERY PRESERVATION AND SPOILATION\n06/27/2025 Notice of Hearing\nIndex # 59\n07/07/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 60\n07/08/2025 Declaration Affidavit\nIndex # 61\nGINA HRPCHA\n07/09/2025 States List of Witnesses\nIndex # 62\n07/14/2025 Order\nIndex # 63\nDISQUALIFING COUNSEL\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 64\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 65\n07/14/2025 No Contact Order\nIndex # 66\n07/14/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 67\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 68.99\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form Index # 69.99\nPAGE 4 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n07/14/2025 Law Enforcement and Confidential Information Form\nIndex # 70.99\n07/15/2025 Receipts\nIndex # 71\nCHELAN COUNTY SHERIFF\n07/17/2025 Motion and Affidavit Declaration\nIndex # 72\nFOR DISBURSEMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS\n07/17/2025 Order Expending Public Funds\nIndex # 73\n07/23/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 74\n08/20/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 75\n08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nIndex # 76\n08/27/2025 Motion Hearing\nIndex # 77\n11/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 78\n11/05/2025 Motion\nIndex # 79\nPRO SE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE & DISMISS\n11/10/2025 Order\nIndex # 80\nDISQUALIFYING COUNSEL\n11/10/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\nIndex # 81\nHEARINGS\n07/05/2024 Preliminary Appearance (4:00 PM)\n07/17/2024 Arraignment and Trial Setting (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/05/2024 Order Establishing Conditions of Release\n07/22/2024 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nDISQUALIFICATION OF COUNSEL\n07/29/2024 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRE: COUNSEL\nEvents: 07/22/2024 Motion Hearing\n08/26/2024 CANCELED Omnibus (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nContinuance\n09/04/2024 Omnibus (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\n09/23/2024 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/29/2024 Order Setting Trial Date\n09/30/2024 CANCELED Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nStricken\nPAGE 5 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n10/08/2024 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nStricken\n11/18/2024 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM)\nEvents: 09/23/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n12/02/2024 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nContinuance\n02/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 11/18/2024 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n02/10/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 02/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n02/18/2025 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nStricken\n02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing (4:00 PM)\n03/05/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nEvents: 02/25/2025 Warrant Identification Hearing\n03/17/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nEvents: 03/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n05/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n05/20/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 03/17/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n06/02/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRELEASE OF DISVOERY/PRESERVE EVIDENCE\n06/16/2025 CANCELED No Contact Order (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nRE-ENTRY\nDuplicate Hearing\n06/16/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Ferrera, Kristin M)\nTO PRESERVE EVIDENCE/RE-ENTRY OF NCO\nEvents: 06/02/2025 Motion Hearing\n06/23/2025 Motion Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nPRESERVE EVIDENCE\nEvents: 06/16/2025 Motion Hearing\n07/07/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n07/14/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nEvents: 07/07/2025 Motion Hearing\n07/22/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 05/05/2025 Order for Continuance of Trial Date\n07/23/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Brandt, Travis C)\nEvents: 07/14/2025 Motion Hearing\nPAGE 6 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\nCHELAN\nC S\nASE UMMARY\nCASE NO. 24-1-00253-04\n08/20/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 07/23/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n08/27/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 08/20/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n11/05/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\n11/10/2025 Readiness Hearing (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nEvents: 11/05/2025 Status Conference / Hearing\n11/17/2025 Status Conference (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer: Jourdan, Robert E)\nRE: COUNSEL\n11/18/2025 Jury Trial (8:00 AM)\nEvents: 08/27/2025 Order Setting Trial Date\nDATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION\nAttorney ESWORTHY, SEAN\nTotal Charges 25.00\nTotal Payments and Credits 25.00\nBalance Due as of 11/14/2025 0.00\nDefendant (WIP) HELL, RYAN MICHAEL\nTotal Charges 5.00\nTotal Payments and Credits 5.00\nBalance Due as of 11/14/2025 0.00\nPAGE 7 OF 7 Printed on 11/14/2025 at 1:03 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_CaseSummaryChelanClerk24-1-00253-04.pdf", "filename": "email_CaseSummaryChelanClerk24-1-00253-04.pdf", "size_mb": 0.35, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.796646", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated\nthe threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this\nseems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since\nthe alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make\nthat they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_shawnEstworthy.pdf", "filename": "email_shawnEstworthy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.526655", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "07/19/24 RiverCom 911 6620\n09:20 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN 537-13-2769\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 79 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Johnsons911-CAD-24C06401.pdf", "filename": "email_Johnsons911-CAD-24C06401.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.857647", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": null, "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file this into the record Sean,", "summary": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford.", "body": "I asked Justin Tittus about the condition of not contacting witnesses, earlier in this case. I expressed concern as I\nprovide a substantial amount of much needed help for mrs Hrpcha which she otherwise is not able to afford. Help with\nher shopping, her chores, shopping, laundry and her dogs which i am helping her train. I have told Juystin during the\nfirst week, in a hearing at the courthouse, I requested access to ask the court for provisions for mrs Hrpcha and Titus\ninformed me that he didnt see her listed as a \"witness\", therefor there was no problem at that time with mrs Hrpcha\nbeing in contact with me.\nMy concern now would be restrictions on communication with mrs Hrpcha, if I add her as a witness. Obviously\nthis is a matter with importance since I generally see Mrs Hrpcha every day and she is in fact going to be driving me to\ncourt on monday.\nWhat are your thoughts?\nThank you\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:49 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nAlright, I can file it into the court file and provide it as discovery to the prosecutor.\nHowever, if the case proceeds to trial, the court the court will want live testimony from fact witnesses.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Monday, July 7, 2025 2:19 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file this into the record\nSean,\nUntil otherwise informed, I am still reliant on you and need you to file this onto the record into evidence please.\nThank you.\nGmail - Re: Please file this into the record 1/3/26, 12:15 PM\nStatement, voluntary, from passenger Gina\nDisability certification, for passenger Gina", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_Re__Please_file_this_into_the_record.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.112650", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Regarding your prior experience and my declaration; when we talked you said you didn\u2019t notice any crime as Jana as she\nis named, made threats to slap the shit out of me on the video which has now been removed from what I have. I asked if you heard that and reminded it.", "body": "Regarding your prior experience and my declaration; when we talked you said you didn\u2019t notice any crime as Jana as she\nis named, made threats to slap the shit out of me on the video which has now been removed from what I have.\nI asked if you heard that and reminded it. You said yes and didn\u2019t seem interested. I asked what your background was if\nyou ever dealt with a felony harassment case or were familiar with the legal constructs of the law which outline\nrequirements and you. Said vaguely and I said the requirement is that the victim is genuinely and legitimately afraid and\nthat conduct of hurling insults and threats of bodily harm to me as Jana clearly did in the video we watched at your\noffice; that\u2019s not conducive to someone who is afraid of someone: to behave in such a way as JANA was showed she\nwas not in any fear. That\u2019s when I explored your experience and knowledge of the relevant law with a couple preliminary\nquestions and you told me you mostly do dui and have never dealt with a felony harassment. That\u2019s all I was conveying\nand it isn\u2019t to insult anyone.\nSean I haven\u2019t done anything unreasonable here and you know this. This alleged crime has been tailored to stick to me\neven though I never committed it. It failed to provide the video proof. And they continue to shape things.\nWhat do they want me to rot in jail for? Ed Murray! I didn\u2019t do anything wrong I simply talked about something which is\nillegal and horrible and they are retaliating to silence me. Other than that why are they railroading me for this.\nAnd why is my passenger not listed in any court papers! I sense grave harm is coming her way and they hid her from the\nrecord to avoid a lawsuit.\nNeither of us want to file a lawsuit. But they kidnapped me then assaulted me and they are trying to put me in prison for\nthis. I am innocent absolutely innocent.\nYou have any suggestions? Or am I supposed to quietly go to a mock trial full of doctored evidence and lying officials\nwho were engaged in a kidnapping scheme for Sally Bagshaw?\nI would be willing to sign a gag order and not release records and move out of state if they will let me. I didn\u2019t know they\nwere this violently trying to harm me!? How psychotic of them what wackos.\nAnd Jeremiah\u2019s wife not working for Rivercom is not true. Perhaps now. I personally have witnessed her entering\nRivercom. So was she fired from there and if so was it over this incident?\nJeremiah surely doesn\u2019t expect to be allowed to commit this crime unchecked does he? Because the fCC and homeland\nsecurity are very interested in the incident since it obstructed life saving 911 service and involved them.\nI just want to be done with this and move. What can I do\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 5:03 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nThey sent me the recording and I have uploaded it the Dropbox.\nThe State provided some other items as well, one which does confirm that Jeremiah Johnson is the\noperations manager.\nThere is a second public records request response which indicates that Jana Johnson does not work\nfor RiverCom.\nYour statement was something more along the lines that I was only a DUI attorney, and either explicitly\nor implicitly said that I did not do felony cases, which is not accurate. You talked throughout much of\nthe video playback, and I certainly may have mentioned doing DUI cases at some point, but I really do\nnot see how that is neither here nor there. I have been on the felony conflict panel for years.\nIn order to be able to move forward on this case, unless there is actual, solid evidence of some larger\nconspiracy, am going to take the case as it is presented. I have already outlined this in a previous e-\nmail and until there is something that would be able to convince a jury otherwise, pursuing what I\ncurrently view as an outlandish defense is a lost cause.\nA possible defense in a similar vein is that you believed this all to be the case, whether or not the facts\nare there to back it up. We would probably need an expert witness to pursue that, however.\nBob can certainly reach out to Gina if she has a phone number.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 2:29 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Re: Clarification on council request history\nOk perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the\nrecord that they are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too\nand would surprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun\npoint onnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this\nwoman who is disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury\nme after they did all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in\nthe face for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager\nand their license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned.\nEver. So far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured\nthey have the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge\npossibly moved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and\nI reluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not\nlying at all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court,\nand it creates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely\ninaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why\nI missed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges\nand the judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes\nto that question. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_2.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_2.pdf", "size_mb": 0.11, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.997648", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Justin Titus", "recipient_email": "justin@titushousersellers.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRyan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself.", "body": "Gmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRyan Hell | More Images\nRyan Hell Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:17 AM\nTo: Justin Titus \nJustin please review\nEthics concern\nIn this lengthy article I am struggling to use my phone on my way to turn myself in, in Chelan for a warrant issued after\na couple court dates were issued and I wasn\u2019t notified and had no means to obtain those dates myself. This court and\nprimarily jurisdiction have become grave concern regarding me getting a fair trial. I am presenting evidence of a\nconflict of interest, ethics violations, as well as prosecutorial misconduct and probably a larger conspiracy to commit\nmurder. I\u2019ve already reported the matter to the Burroughs of Justice and I\u2019ll continue to red flag until I feel safe. I ask\nyou to carefully consider these facts with a non emotional point of view leaving opinions at the door. I don\u2019t expect\neveryone likes my views, I just don\u2019t expect my government to stalk and murder me and a passenger on the Fourth of\nJuly for them. Secomdary Conflict of Interest / Ethics Concern \u201cBarber\u201d There was a woman at the seen who was\nintroduced to me and her name I am not quite sure but I IMMEDIATELY recognized her in my first court date as the\nStenographer. I attempted to tell my lawyer he urged me not to. Let\u2019s call her Barbara for clarity, since I couldn\u2019t get\nher formal name. MOST CONCERNING AND WHY I AM WRITING A KING COUNTY SENIOR LEVEL\nPROSECUTOR aND established SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL WOMAN , whom I have made the misfortune of of\nbecome a political target OF; SALLY BAGSHAW Has direct involvement in this case and was even at the scene. What\nis more damnign; for the state; is I even have photos of her attempting to flee the scene of the incident being told by\nthe alleged \u201cvictims\u201d to hurry before the cops get there. If that isn\u2019t a brazen criminality. And if equal justice doesn\u2019t\nmean anything for me today or next month in my jury: someday it will. I can only hope. These are massive crimes and\nthe incidents here are only indicators of a much broader scheme of brazen criminality, contempt and hypocrisy. July\n4th I called 911 to re medical aid for a diabetic friend. I was dealing with flat tire and was in a canyon out of cell service\naside from e911. Dispatchers sent off duty dispatchers who said the only way they could get her help is if we went in\ntheir pers. Veh. To their home. At the home no aid arrived, instead unwarranted tow truck did demanding cash. $1000.\nI reminded driver it was unauthorized. He surrendered keys to homeowner who then said he was robbing me of my\ntruck. Without going on more the case argues that Ryan Hell, myself, threatened the tow operator over some tow bill.\nRyan was resigned for 3x fel threats. Initial appointed counsel resigns. Titus, Justin assigned. I have called emailed\nand texted Justin Titus and never been able to communicate with him. I\u2019ve left several messages to voice mail, with at\nleast 20 emails also sent to Justin\u2019s email which I had to locate myself at Wa State bar. I recorded one response with\nsome preliminary discovery materials, which was the police report including witness statement. That confirmed I had a\nproper working email. I have faith in my innocence and I was optimistic in the fact that justice would eventually prevail\nand clear the name I have worked hard to clear of good conscience for several decades. I have been proactive in\nobtaining and maintaining contact info for the courts, and defense and I have called and gotten court dates by dialing\ncourt clerks for Chelan county. I have attempted throughout, each week to connect with council, Titus told him I had\nconcerns about the duration of records being kept which would be exculpatory evidence critical to my case. Justin did\nnot reply. I mentioned the concern to Mr Titus while in court at a personal appearance in Chelan Superior some time\nearlier. Justin assured me the recorded 911 calls would be saved and available and not destroyed. My concern, as I\ntold Justin, was that this was a sleight of hand manipulation played by dispatchers based in the initial conversation on\n911. I called for emergency medical and at no time did I volunteer or request any sort of roadside assistance for the\nflat tire I had as I had worked in tire stores many years and have familiarity with Wenatchee offerings having lived and\nrun my own LLC as a field provider there doing break fix repairs for tech products throughout the state, for 7 years\nwhile attending university. The tone of court while irrelevant is that of one which is not going to take any gruff and I\nrespect that. And I don\u2019t even expect a two way street. That\u2019s something from a guy who is being charged after\ntactfully defending himself and more importantly his passenger, from what appeared to be a very elaborate effort to do\nme and likely her grave harm. Since I am effectively denied access to council where this matter would be best suited: I\nwill present this hear and my hopes is you can assess these claims and determine if this is a problem for this court.\nAgain I am unable to access counsel cannot afford any and have since fallen into some sort of destruction cross hairs\nby judge jourdan thru. In 2016, 17; in Seattle wa the Mayor Ed Murray was being ousted for his earlier career in youth\nworks and foster programs which problematically was overshadowed by a disgusting string of predatory events\nnamely molesting orphans and foster children, and they had all been of African American descent. These allegations\n1 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nhad been reported by the children ages 4-12 and also other volunteers and workers. A substantial enough amount of\nthis eventually occurred to warrant a state children\u2019s protective services court hearing and a sworn judge took careful\ninventory of the merits then decided to rule that Ed Murray was guilty of molesting those kids and he was in fact every\nbit pattern of child sex predator. That hearing occurred in 1984 and Ed Murray\u2019s career continued, a crime itself, and\nhe moved to Seattle eventually becoming the mayor of the city of Seattle. Accusations came out and Murray denied\nthem. One accuser miraculously succeeded in filing a lawsuit and there was a lot of cheering amongst many of us\nwho had been victims in foster care and other state institutions; we cheered for justice. And perseverance, the strong\nwill the determination and the hope for all thati is good to come to light past the bad. In 2017 Delvonn Heckard that\nplaintiff died of a reported overdose days after the suit was filed and that was something we had a hard time with a lot\nof us felt like it was murder. We discussed this in depth and a times reporter said they had an anonymous tip who only\nsaid Ed Murray has a court case for molestatiom and it is the only proof that he was actually a molestor\u2026 and the\ncase is sitting archives sealed or whatever and will permanently be destroyed inn4 days. They asked me for advice. I\nsimply suggested they file a FOIA with Eugene Oregon and Oregon State Patrol records. Two days later the Murray\nlies went silent in Seattle mayors office and Murray quietly resigned. How does this apply to our case? In the incident,\nas I was waiting for the police to arrive; there were threats to my life made by the homeowners saying the police were\ngonna make me sorry for not paying them and they were gong to have me executed onsite. I then heard a woman\nfrantically yelling \u201cwhere is he I don\u2019t want Ryan to see me he can\u2019t see me\u201d, and some men said back \u201cyou gotta go\nnow just go hurry up they are almost hear\u201d. The woman I ran to catch a picture of, knowing she was yet another piece\nof evidence and someone who should not have been where they were, was a woman named \u201cSally Bagshaw\u201d, a\ncareer politician and political figure of highest order, from Seattle Washington. Sally\u2019s colorful career involves being a\nsenior da, as well as a city council woman. As I learned later, Sally was a dominant supporter of Ed Murray and she\nhad aggressively controlled and swayed the diecision of the council and fought surrender as dozens of accusers\npresented claims day by day leading up to his resignations. Even after the case from 1984 surfaced Sally attempted to\nkeep Ed Murray in office. Let\u2019s look at this detail A former prosecutor. 7 years or so. Targeted women\u2019s ad coach,\nprobably a lot of sex crimes and trafficking stuff, that sort of thing. So Sally Bagshaw was aggressively defending Ed\nMurray and fighting fellow councilman to keep this man who clearly had enough accusers with merit, and court\nrecords now and then let\u2019s face it; there can literally be very little portion of the entire community who is more\nVULNERABLE and UNDERrepresented then the African American orphans in Eugene Oregon in 1984! What a\ndisgusting vulture both of them then and now, Ed and Sally. I\u2019m also a bit of a satirist, I dabble with creativity and enjoy\ncreating political cartoons to vent my frustration and debut a sense of humor. I think it is a classic way to express\nstimulating thought. And it\u2019s also a very historical way to get targeted by corrupt officials. Goons. Criminals. And even\nmafia types. So dabble lightly. And I never try to lie or manipulate although admittedly that is sort of how we express\nour intended message. I try to stay out of party politics. But I\u2019m hard pressed to not see a chilling connection between\nsome things and it\u2019s inevitable it spills out. Ed Murray however; near immediately my engagement had gotten my\nname tagged and harassed on social media. It was immediately clear he was being aggressively protected by\nprofessional contractors. That FASCINATED me. Why would they do that?! Who?! And what?! I\u2019m a curious cat\nunfortunately so I dug. In 2017 my wife at the time was a Federal TSA Officer. While I was asleep she got up for work\nwalking to her bus stop at Dash Point Road near Redondo Beach Wa. Decent area. Very good viability and traffic. She\nwas robbed by a man who produced a hand gun cocking it then putting it to her head, yelling give me money. They\nnever caught that man and a detective later smirked when talking to me saying \u201cwe won\u2019t find him, sneered and\nlooked at me then said \u201cI hear you guys are moving?\u201d. We moved to Philadelphia then nyc and then I returned in 23\u2019.\nI\u2019ve been targeted by what appear to be deep state types. And then 3rd of July this incident in Chelan county, n a\ndesert. Canyon near Malaga. I have video and photos and Facebook post where I noted the night before while we\nenjoyed the view, that there were people watching us. Using optics. I could see the flickers in the distance and I had\nmy own as well. I was seeing multiple vehicles. Both sides. Not campers. I told my passenger they were spotting\nvisitors in the area due to wildfire risk that way if there is a fire they know who was there. We lit no fires at all.\nAbsolutely compliant. It\u2019s yet to be told, but I surmise during the night of july 3rd of one of these spotters captured my\nlicense plate info then ran it into DAPS. Once that was done someone over in Seattle or with the right interest seen it.\nThen Sally Bagshaw who isn\u2019t a resident there, made the trip over to Wenatchee to meet up with these dispatchers to\ntry to entrap me or god forbid, create some situation in order to execute me. What I do know is she isn\u2019t a resident and\nshe is THE well established primary alpha protector of my primarily focus of vitriol which has been Ed Murray, since\n2016. I didn\u2019t ask for her to come there. I never met or heard of her before. This was a total attempt to attack me, by a\nformer SENIOR PROSECUTOR. I was a law abiding citizen engaging in travel in a place designated as appropriate\nfor me, my passengers and my type of vehicle. I can\u2019t change who my biological parents were. But I can change the\nway the world looks at me as disadvantaged.\n2 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nOn Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:56 AM Justin Titus wrote:\n[Quoted text hidden]\n4 attachments\n3 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\nGmail - Ryan Hell | More Images https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nD3F4F8EB-2686-4A4D-8534-C3C0528D03B8.jpeg\n53K\n527A6DA4-F8A3-4110-859A-D3D164A07FFC.jpeg\n54K\nIMG_6448.jpeg\n1435K\nIMG_6452.jpeg\n3778K\n4 of 4 1/3/26, 12:26 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/Gmail_-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "filename": "Gmail_-_Ryan_Hell___More_Images.pdf", "size_mb": 5.72, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.844671", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/heidi.pdf", "filename": "heidi.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.863671", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.", "body": "I\u2019ve asked you to preserve evidence regarding the following:\n1.) The names and employers of both Jeremiah and his spouse or whatever; who we all know both worked for\nrivercom 911. This is a relevant detail amd all we confirmed in casual oral dialogue was the fact that Jeremiah worked\nfor rivercom.\n2.) the cad files been altered. While it distinguishes the original purpose for my call being to get EMERGENCY\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE for my passenger and myself; and it declares her as exhibiting signs of insulin shock: it\ndoesn\u2019t contain any of the original convo which I recall distinctly and painfully; since the female dispatcher who I spoke\nto had flatly told me she refused to provide us with aid car ambulance medical help or fire response. I begged her and\nshe persisted to refuse.\nShe instead began asking me about my truck, the engine and whether it was 4 wheel drive and if it was PAID FOR.\nHow many miles does it have. The nature of these details is intrinsically EXCULPATORY. and therefor absolute Brady\nrelated potential .\nThe dispatcher lied to me saying \u201cthe only option we have to save my passengers life is to allow a deputy to pick us\nup, to which I consented without hesitation. She then told me she could only locate a \u201ccity manager and orchard\nmaintenance director\u201d to come to our emergency aid. She said she could have them drive us out of the canyon and\nAnand car would either meet us there or at their personal home. I asked if that\u2019s our only option she said yes.\nThat information is also extremely relevant because it provides the jury context and illustrates the true nature of the\nemergency and my panic as my passenger was dying and I was now suffering with severe heat exhaustion and some\nsymptoms of a stroke which I have had in recent years.\nRegarding the push back from counsel.\nIf you are refusing to represent me in a fashion described above; you need to explain that on the record to our judge\nthen ask him to replace me.\nI have been very patient and proactive throughout this case. I am being lied to then gas lighted and ridiculed like for\none small example; when you agree prior to rework my motion and submit it then show up to court, mumble so badly I\nhad to ask the judge to stop you and ask you to speak clearly. That is a piece of judicial unsure in and of itself which\nwill be inspected later. But the matter at hand here and now is you spoke slower than normal based on our experience\ntogether, you rambled about me and provided character assassination in the way of calling me paranoid and claiming I\nwas trying to establish proof of Jeremiah being friends with the deputy. That was an outright lie and you are absolutely\naware of that. As a lawyer you didn\u2019t mix that up and we have talked about that detail and I proactively dismissed then\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndetail as a non legal problem for their prosecution, and I even said I know a jury won\u2019t judge that.\nSome background\nI worked as a commercial construction superintendent on the east coast in a greater metro complex of over 14\nmillion people. The primary territory I worked was skirted by nearly 2000 municpal jurisdictions in Pennsylvania jersey\nMaryland Delaware. Those townships are about the size of Malaga. I\u2019ve fought bitter battles and learned life lessons\nwith small towns and I\u2019m very familiar and seen a lot worse nepotism and so forth than Jeremiah being buddies with a\nsheriff. I\u2019ve had inspectors who were married to hiway departments where they shut down multimillion dollar jobs\nbecause I wouldn\u2019t pay bribes or break the law. The minute I went to the township I met the grandma who was their\nclerk, the dad who was the mayor and so on and on. So please give me the benefit of the doubt that I\u2019m not your\naverage udiot. Slow. But not inexperienced and unfamiliar.\nYou knew that I had a narrow scope of needs and provided a reason for those as well. You skipped over it completely\nrefusing to read note from it then either insulted me or slandered me by falsely claiming I had some wacky conspiracy\nconcern about relations amongst the different county workers.\nAs far as a conspiracy; let\u2019s define what a conspiracy is in case you forgot amidst your use of the word to belittle or\ndestroy a man who isn\u2019t just innocent; but was attempting to save a DISABLED woman\u2019s life; only to be kidnapped\nextorted assaulted and lied about.\nCONSPIRACY:\n\u201ca secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful\u201d.\nTo say that this 911 emergency medical call was not a conspiracy is ridiculous. At this point we have the following\nevidence which is indisputable.\n1.) I was a law abiding citizen in a licensed vehicle enjoying a public park on a holiday and not violating any laws or\nrules.\n2) after my vehicle was disabled I attempted to make it back then became fully stuck and we were without cell service\nand were only able to call 911\n3) my passengers disability and evolving medical conditions were suffice to warrant PANIC from me which would be\nevident in the original 911 call where I begged screamed and cried to not let her die. Keep in mind I only know this\nlady as a casual aquintemce and help her with her dogs etc. I was hysterical as the dispatcher laughed literally\nlaughed and said sorry no ambulance will come.\n4) the act of telling us there were no ambulances and that our only option was to allow people to pick us up and drive\nus to their home: was a trick. On maps it\u2019s apparent they drove to a house the opposite direction of the hospital. I\nasked why we were going the wrong way and said why can\u2019t you take us to the hospital they lied then saying an\nambulance was waiting at the house then lied saying they made a mistake. But it was coming back. This lie was a\ntrick to get us inside their property. Which was remotely isolated and outside of cellular services and too far to go for\nhelp. This constitutes as kidnapping. Laugh as you do all you want, but what\u2019s my crime up until now?\n5) the act of separating is then ambushing me with a tow truck is a act of deceit as well. I never contacted any tow\ntruck. I never requested any tow truck. I never asked for repairs and I never accepted any repairs. There was no tow.\nThere was no impound. The vehicle was released. I asked my passenger how did they get it down the road with two\nflats? She said \u201cthey put your spare back on and they put air in it.\u201d. So all these repairs and roadside you guys keep\nmentioning I requested and needed: it\u2019s an outright lie. And it\u2019s probable because you sent the vehicle off that same\nnight with no work or parts other than simply adding air to the tire. Which I knew and which I explained to the\ndispatcher and Jeremiah MULTIPLE times as they kept trying to weasel me into consent. I\u2019m not an idiot. The tire was\nflat and I pulled it and put my flat spare on. That\u2019s the wheel I drove 20 miles on and destroyed the tire and the wheel\nbefore getting stuck. I did that because the alloy is an expensive wheel and harder to find as ford makes a ton of\nthese.\nYour tow driver in the red roll back from Cashmere wa, was FROM BT TOWING CASHMERE, BY THE WAY, NOT\nSTANS MOUNTAIN VIEW as indicated in the court documents!! CHECK the VIDEOS AND MY PHOTOS! You guys\nare LYING about the tow company involved even. I use the intentional and inflammatory term LYING because there\u2019s\neveryone\u2019s oops accidentally just mixed up the name of the very tow company involved in this fabricated impound bill\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\ndispute and subsequent fabrication of charges claiming some type of assorted threats! Let\u2019s get that clarified also and\non the record please and as soon as possible.\nIncorrect tow company names in reports:\nWhat you are doing is contributing to the obstruction of justice. Because you knew I never said that. I provided the ai\ngenerated brief as a starting poker and I liked the items from a high level. I need to preserve this evidence and I\nmentioned multiple times I cannot otherwise obtain the evidence as in say, a records request from the dispatcher\nagency rivercom or other. For multiple reasons you are aware of and I\u2019ll list a couple for this record:\n1:) I have a felony superior court no contact order prohibiting contact with TWO employees at that agency. I can\u2019t be\nsure either will not field any request I make.\n2:) I have exceeded the new time limits thanks to an expansive new addition to their records request policy link: all of\nwhich was created just days after this alleged crime. That can be easily verified by checking the way back machine\ninternet snapshot for rivercom\u2019s webpage in records request. It\u2019s like it didn\u2019t even exist almost then bam all sorts of\nred tape.\n3:) I can\u2019t afford to and I am exhausted of resources including time due to the lengthy drawn out procedure of proving\nmy innocence for the matter in which we are tasked to defend myself\nImproper place of arrest indicated by deputy:\nThe deputy claimed something about he picked me up near the bridge. I can\u2019t see a bridge anywhere close to the\nresidence this occures at. I had refused to leave and only went to the edge of the property after the woman in the red\nTacoma 4x4 fled the scene upon their orders. I walked less than 60 feet from the gate and I seen them approaching at\na pace of about 10 miles an hour and they almost were appearing as if unsure. I knew that the disagrees called in on\nme so I assumed the officers may be jumpy and I initiated the non threatening action of raising my hands and calmly\nindicating my name. They calmly asked me to move to place on the road which was out of the view of their dash cams\nand they then started the escalation of force without provocation, threatening to shoot and even falsely claiming I was\nholding a pistol and then discussing the shot and who would fire first . Again; all I did was call 911 to save a woman\u2019s\nlife. Then refused to pay cash to a tow operator for repairs I never needed and never asked for. I was beaten\nthreatened and then falsely accused and arrested after nearly being shot in cold blood by co-conspirators. Because\ntheir force was so excessive and unjustified that they could only be acting in conjunction with the bad actors who\noriginated the call to risk such a significant and egregious violation of use of doze policy. But that\u2019s not the center of\nyour portion of the crime that will be for a civil lawyer. However; the incorrect location of arrest can be used to alter the\ntimeline as from my understanding there is about a 30 minute jog at the least, needed to get near any bridge. And the\nimplication of such a trip would be altering the context and issues which I am exhaustively trying to outline as\nexculpatory evidence for your judge and prosecutor and yourself. Anyhow timeline is critical and this is not a minor\naltercation of timeline please address and clarify the physical location of custody at what spot did deputies meet me.\nAnd most of all the entire narrative for what it\u2019s worth; is also a MASSIVE LIE. You already let the video disappear of\nthe deputy being instructed there. Was no tow bill and no impound and I owed him NOTHING. So now let\u2019s just say\nthere is no supporting document or evidence of any form of outstanding financial obligation to the tow driver or any\nothers. In fact the very vehicle in question was surrendered and handed over to my passenger upon verbal\nauthorization by the deputy at the back seat of his patrol car where I sat. I consented after he asked me if she can\ntake my truck home. \u201cAbsolutely yes, I said. And thank you\u201d. They drove her to the parking ride I am told them she\ndrove over the pass. After simply putting air in the tire. So you don\u2019t just have a lot of holes in your story and chain of\nevidence; you have a ton of ethics and civil violations and ongoing harm to me and my pass\nGet after nearly killing us in a completely IDIOTIC attempt to make a meager 1000 dollars. I personally suspect that\nwasn\u2019t the motive to mess with us. But I am not sharing more on that. Although it did strike an eri semblance to a\ngroup of three young girls who were found dead with plastic bags over their heads and ZIP TIES on their wrist\u2026 and\nthe father who is blamed is still supposedly at large with no track. I am going to say sincerely that I prey your\njurisdiction isn\u2019t involved in any wrong doing there but the malfeasance demonstrated in Malaga on July 4th and still\nnow sure is pure and I mean absolutely unadulterated EVIL, sick and evil to the bone what was done to us. And it\u2019s a\nhorrible level of collusion being openly demonstrated to cover this all up. Changing policy, hiding evidence, assigning\nineffective legal counsel. They sure seem to me like innocent passengers, of a guy who was down on his luck BUT\nNOT breaking any laws and simply chose to enjoy a summer trip in a CHELAN county park. I can only imagine what\nmight have occurred and I try not to. I know nothing and it\u2019s pure speculation and I\u2019m sorry but we were kidnapped\nand denied emergency medical after dialing 911 for a ambulance for dying disabled woman. They tried to extort me for\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nunsolicited unneeded repairs and then tried to order me to leave the property and leave my truck presumably for a\nabandoned vehicle claim which only takes 15 days.\nThey altered 911 call data. They fabricated a narrative without any substance then assigned me multiple attorneys\nwho refused to provide evidence in a timely manner then refused to preserve evidence.\nIt\u2019s frustrating but hey. I guess that\u2019s why people get paid millions of dollars for corruption cases like this.\n-Ryan Hell\nOn Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nIf you want to put information in front of the court, we would need a declaration from you or someone\nelse. Although, as I have previously indicated, it is usually advisable at this point to remain silent and\nnot make any statements regarding the incident itself. However, as you seem to want to anyhow, it is\nultimately your choice to remain silent or present your beliefs to the court.\nIf you want to file LLM generated motions, that is fine, but I am not going to sign off on them or\nendorse them. I would note as a word of caution that using LLM generated information which is false,\nespecially citations, can be sanctionable.\nI've asked the investigator to submit some a request to Rivercom for whatever triage system they use,\nif they have one at all. Also, for employment of Jana Johnson by Rivercom.\nThe CAD log on the initial call from you indicates that Kalah McCurdy was the calltaker.\nThe second CAD log indicates that there are several calltakers involved: Heidi Harvill, Cayla Rogers,\nCarleigh Smith, and Dee Gutierrez.\nHowever, it could in fact be the case that the response to the initial call was improper and EMS should\nhave been sent. I agree that it is also unusual for an off-duty dispatcher to take people to their\nproperty. I am not sure how exactly that will fit in the criminal allegation of whether there was a threat\nto get a gun if they took the truck unless the idea is to try and say they and the tow company fabricated\nthe threat because they were trying to coverup the 911 call or something like that. As it stands, this\nseems like a relatively weak connection and requires that the tow company be \"in on it\" as well since\nthe alleged threat is actually in relation to the tow and not the 911 call. An argument could be make\nthat they get a lot of business from Rivercom or something to that effect, but it still seems shaky.\nThe state is going to have a much more straight-forward and buyable narrative. They may even\nacknowledge that they should have sent EMS and that it is unorthodox to take a person to a 911\ndispatcher's property. I have a feeling, which we may uncover at the interview, that he will, in fact,\nconcede that.\nThe bottom line, again, is if the case ends up going to trial, the jury will need to decide if the state has\nproven behind a reasonable doubt that you made a threat to kill as defined in the law. If there is some\nactual evidence of evidence tampering prior to that, that would be a big deal. But you will also need to\nkeep in mind that there are hours of video for every case these days, and virtually no one but you is\nclaiming they are faked. They are not even faked in a way to frame you for a crime and they kept in the\nwife's own threats. Everyone, including the judge or jury, is likely to be extremely skeptical and think it\nis just searching for a conspiracy that does not exist.\nIf that is the only defense there is at trial, I will run with it, but I still do not think a jury is going to buy it.\nAt that point, I would still probably fall back to the legal defenses (not a true threat) based off their\nGmail - Re: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion 1/3/26, 11:57 AM\nseeming non-fear, statements during, statements after, etc.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 10:00 AM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion\nSean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time\nto think about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to\nthe to the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of\nthe employment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press\nthat we get it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two\nreasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along.\nI showed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by\neither Jeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s\ntrying to achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a\nmedical declared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/shawnEstworthy.pdf", "filename": "shawnEstworthy.pdf", "size_mb": 0.13, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.789670", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING", "summary": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.", "body": "EVIDENCE TAMPERING\nAttached is my Superior Court Motion drafted on November 5th 2025 which summarizes the GROSS MISCONDUCT\nAND INTENTIONAL ATTACKS ON MY CIVIL RIGHTS committed by the State of Washington in the Chelan Superior\nCourt on the MATTER of CASE # 24-1-00253-04\nThis incident was a wanton and willful CONSPIRACY TO DENY CIVIL RIGHTS and has incorporated any number of\nlocal jurisdictional agencies such as WENATCHEE VALLEY FIRE, RIVERCOM 911, CHELAN\nCOUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, CHELAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS, CHELAN COUNTY COURTS, and CHELAN\nCOUNTY PUBLIC DEFENSE INCLUDING NUMEROUS ASSIGNED COUNSEL INCLUDING SEAN ESTWORTHTY,\nJUSTIN TITUS, AND BRIAN CHASE. THis case presents a text-boo case of systemic corruption and my evidence\nnamed in this motion merely highlights the few details for just a few core pieces of the states case against me, which\nin fact was not a crime against anyomne else but rather; a dying woman and a man suffering a possible stroke\ndesperately trying to get his passenger to a ER.\nA DEFUNCT tow company was introduced while the rivercom 911 DIRECTOR himself continued to refuse medical\nassessment and or transport to facility for care.\nA former state VIP was ushered off of the property and struck me with her vehicle as she continued to flee, just prior to\nthe swatting event. I have photos and videos of the assault and the woman, SALLY BAGSHAW will be brought to\njustice for her role in this kidnap and murder plot.\nIRREVERSIBLE life threatening health implications have plagued the female passenger since, and she has been\nrushed to critical care at least once since.\nThe disgusting treatment of our emergency and especially the current legal attempts to inflict further harm and hide\nthat criminal wrongdoing committed by these officials is incredibly disturbing and very telling and will be the end of\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM\nmany careers.\nThere are DOZENS of components which indicate across a spectrum of media and entities which myself and a\ncoalition of grass roots helpers have accumulated to ensure I have air tight evidence of this conspiracy to silence me,\nand that this is in fact a systemic corruption case involving a CONSPIRACY to violate both my passengers as well my\nown civil rights.\nI present this motion as a last chance to quit while you are ahead.\nRyan Hell\nryanhellfiles.com\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nSEATTLE, WA\nGmail - Re: Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice Due to OUTRAGEOUS Government Misconduct, and EVIDENCE TAMPERING 1/25/26, 11:58 PM", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne.pdf", "filename": "email_BrianChaseAppointedCounsel_SayingMyMotionIsFollisjButRefusingToHelpWithOne.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.356641", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer.", "body": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in\npart for that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing\nvideos where you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the\nrecord that they are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too\nand would surprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun\npoint onnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this\nwoman who is disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury\nme after they did all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in\nthe face for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager\nand their license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned.\nEver. So far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured\nthey have the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge\npossibly moved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and\nI reluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not\nlying at all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court,\nand it creates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely\ninaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why\nI missed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges\nand the judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes\nto that question. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.458654", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Gmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a... Ryan Hell \nRe: State's response to motion\n1 message\nRyan Hell Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1.", "body": "Gmail - Re: State's response to motion https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=a...\nRyan Hell \nRe: State's response to motion\n1 message\nRyan Hell Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:26 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSean,\nI would like you to file a brady motion for the following reasons:\nDELIBERATE LOSS / DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE\nLOSS OF MY ORIGINAL 911 CALL FOR MEDICAL AID\n1. for several months I hounded the courts, Justin Titus, even Rivercom and Chelan County Sheriffs and the Judges\nChambers and Prosecutors office regarding the 911 AUDIO from my intial call. ALL HAD REFUSED ME ACCESS\nAND ASSURED ME THE AUDIO WOULD REMAIN PRESERVED AND AVAILABLE.\n2. ALTERATION OF VIDEOS AND OR (TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE 9A.72.150)\nThe videos you and I reviewed inside your office were in fact quite different than those yiou have shared with me for\npersonal possession after a court motion request the access to my evidence was granted\na. chelan county sheriff deputy could be heard asking the tow driver for the impound bill and two times he distinctly\nsays there is not any money owed and there is no impound.\n2. multiple discrepancies are visible in the newest dash cam which appears to be a camera aiming at the floor.\nAlso what time is court?\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:29 AM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nRyan,\nIt looks like the State filed this response (attached) yesterday for the hearing for Monday.\nSean R. Esworthy\nKottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC\nWSBA # 42901\n435 Orondo Ave.\nWenatchee, WA 98801\nOffice: (509) 667-8667\nFax: (509) 667-8837\nEmail: sean@wenatcheelaw.com\nThis e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged\nand confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any\nunauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the\nintended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (509) 667-8667, and destroy all copies of\nthe original message.\n1 of 1 1/24/26, 2:31 PM\n", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_BradyMotionRequest-SeanEstworthy-June-16-2025.pdf", "filename": "email_BradyMotionRequest-SeanEstworthy-June-16-2025.pdf", "size_mb": 0.1, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.045649", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Please file for reconsideration on my preservation motion Sean, good afternoon", "summary": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time. I would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it.", "body": "Sean, good afternoon\nThis email is for you only; do not file or disclose to anyone else\nI need you to file for a reconsideration for the preservation motion using addendum you didn\u2019t read last time.\nI would like you to please file for a reconsideration on my motion for preservation that we had filed after some time to\nthink about it and talk to some people and read some stuff about it. It looks like I have an ability to file for a\nreconsideration on a matter.\nI think we would be trying to reconsider, and I\u2019m hoping that the motion addendum that I had sent to you that you\ndidn\u2019t read in a courtroom I would like to get that information in front of the judge and on the record to bring light to the\nto the to the Motion so that there\u2019s some background and he can understand what\u2019s going on\nI also need to know what my next court date is and if that\u2019s a Zoom appearance or not\nI realized in court at that motion, hearing for preservation that we just had also that there was a confirmation of the\nemployment status of one of the victims Jeremiah working for the 91 dispatch company. I would like to press that we\nget it on the record who the spouse works for as well I think she is of the most important and that\u2019s for two reasons.\nthat she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual is that she was also a dispatcher. This is an actual rivercom\noperation to pick me up and take me to that house THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE HOSPITAL which was\nunusual and unorthodox.\nThe other reason is is that she was the one fielding the calls I made. THE VICTIM INTENTIONALLY CREATED\nHER SITUATION. She knew I needed an ambulance\nWhen I had watched the videos in your office I seen strong indication that she had been taking the calls all along. I\nshowed other video analyst they also said as well that they believe that my phone calls were being fielded by either\nJeremiah or his wife throughout this ordeal.\nThat is a startling revelation to me myself, and it really creates a real sketchy situation when somebody\u2019s trying\nto achieve an emergency medical assistance for a dying person (she was in fact dying) and myself also in a medical\ndeclared emergency for a possible stroke as I declared in 911.", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_heidi.pdf", "filename": "email_heidi.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.650656", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Sean Esworthy", "recipient_email": "sean@wenatcheelaw.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Clarification on council request history Sean", "summary": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in part\nfor that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing videos\nwhere you told me you were a DUI lawyer.", "body": "Ok perfect. I assume the judge is going to want that at the next hearing: I anticipate being called a trouble maker in part\nfor that detail in which I need prof asserting my version of events, as well as the episode in your office reviewing videos\nwhere you told me you were a DUI lawyer. I never intent that as an imsult I simply want to establish for the record that\nthey are inadequately equipping me for a trial. I doubt you will admit it but if you do that is fantastic too and would\nsurprise me.\nI don\u2019t want to put anyone in the hot seat. Or harms ways I told you already these bastards robbed my wife at gun point\nonnpac way and dash point road near redondo beach, in uniform as tsa which is a federal officer. Now this woman who\nis disabled and protected they deny her an ambulance. Serious shit. They lie and try to take me and.bury me after they\ndid all this. Come on. Sally Bagshaw.\nAnyway I crashed out in the court room and I called\nIt what DoJ called it which is kidnapping and extortion. I\u2019m not violent and I was tolerant even as they punched me in the\nface for no reason, hurled insults, vandalized my truck. Now they are scared of losing their operations manager and\ntheir license which is how it generally goes when you commit brazen crimes like those.\nIf they want to negotiate a cease fire then let\u2019s talk. I\u2019m looking for this to be over so I can move on. But they seemed\ndetermined to bury me for many years over these ficticious claims\nOn Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM Sean Esworthy wrote:\nWe will put in a request for the recording/transcript for whatever they have from the 3/5/25 where Mr.\nTitus was removed.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 12:03 PM\nTo: Sean Esworthy \nSubject: Clarification on council request history\nSean\nThis question is about the judges uproar last hearing regarding the prior dismissal of my council. I firmly am aware\n110% that I have not ever in my LIFE fired any attorney nor seemed to have any attorney removed or reassigned. Ever.\nSo far.\nThe judges interpretation of prior hearings or perhaps his interpretation of notes, is that I had fired the last attorney,\nJustin Titus. While Mr Titus did in fact intentionally cause grave harm to my defense while he and a prior judge both\nreassured me on the record that the 911 calls I made for Gina\u2019s medical emergency were being saved, even after I\ninformed them the duration of 911 audio is only 90 days so time is limited; they both confirmed I can be assured they\nhave the audio and it won\u2019t be deleted. I can pull that up in transcripts maybe later if needed myself.\nHowever the question as to whether or not I fired Mr Titus is a simple one for me to remember due to the distinctly\nunusual sequence and response by this judge we seen last.\nThis dialogue was very close to something like this, and the hearing was for a failed appearance warrant quashing. I\nvery calmly and politely informed the judge I am having communication problems with Mr Titus. I let him know after\nsome 8 months (forget exactly how long but basically the duration of Mr Titus\u2019s representation of me) I had yet to\nspeak to him regarding this matter. I\u2019ve seen no evidence and I am concerned about the 911 call audio for the call I\nmade. That judge had acknowledged my concern; the first of the kind ever in my life to be made; and he had politely\nasked if I wanted to fire Mr Titus.\nI very vividly recall telling him no. The judge almost instantly turned to Mr Titus and asked him \u201cok, Mr Titus what do\nyou think? Can you handle Mr hells case / request or do you think he should seek new counsel?\u201d Mr Titus said \u201coh I\nthink he should seek new counsel\u201d. The judge then said ok I\u2019ll put in the order to reassign counsel. The judge possibly\nmoved on to explain that speedy trial was now askew due to counsel etc and requested I sign a waiver and I\nreluctantly would agree if that was even formally ascertained.\nI know you can get that transcript much faster than I can. Or say I might hope.\nIf not let me know and I will file a records request.\nThis is key material for next Monday\u2019s hearing as the judge called me a liar on multiple issues for which I am not lying\nat all and I don\u2019t like it and it portrays me as a hostile witness, and it opens up approach for contempt of court, and it\ncreates an impeachable aura about me which is not just extremely harmful in this trial, but it is extremely inaccurate.\nI have never lied in any court room. This judge must surely know he is fabricating those allegations about me lying in\ncourt and I want to be prepared with the transcripts of the warrant quashing hearing where I let the judge know why I\nmissed court and how it is not possible to get my court dates from Justin Titus and the other issues of divulges and\nthe judge jumped to asking if I wanted to fire Mr Titus. I know for a fact without any doubt that I did not say yes to that\nquestion. I need verification because the judge is trying to hold me in contempt on Monday, for a truth I told.\nI", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_3.pdf", "filename": "email_Re-_Clarification_on_council_request_history_3.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.363653", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": "hotline@fcc.gov", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nChelan County Wa State: Egregious 911 Abuse and Cover Up\nRyan Hell Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM\nTo: \nMy name is Ryan Hell. My DoB is 01-09-1978.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nChelan County Wa State: Egregious 911 Abuse and Cover Up\nRyan Hell Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:06 PM\nTo: \nMy name is Ryan Hell. My DoB is 01-09-1978.\nI live in Seattle Washington.\nI am writing to inform you and desperately seek some injunction to stop the false prosecution of me, in light of a\nmountain of evidence of operational misconductuct and mal;feasence which namely, as it were;\nA CRIMINAL SCHEME TO KIDNAP AND MURDER ME DURING AN EMERGENCY CALL FOR URGENT LIFE SAVING\nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE.\nI WAS KIDNAPPED BY CORUPT DISPATCHERS ON JULY 4th 2024 in Chelan County Wa State. They denied ambulance\noffered personal ride then OPERATION MANAGER took us to his personal home and had me assauklted and demanded\n1000 dollars cash for a non existant and unauthorized tow or repair of my truck; then later as seen in their video\nevidedence they demanded 1000 themselves saying\" this is for us. For savcing your life\"\nMassive cover up. They are attemotuhg to railroad me thru court with corrupt pubvlic defese and judges to disappear\nand silence me..,\nIMMEDIATE EM ERGENCY FEDERAL ASSISTANCE NEED}ED\nThis occured on July 4th 2024. The location was Malaga Wa, in Chelan County, the center part of Washingt State.\nOverview of Incident:\na friend and I had planned for some time to go camping with her dogs. As Juy 4th settled closer, we opted for a trip ion\nthat day, and packed our gear and took off in my 2007 F150 pickup. Fully licensed and current tabs and tags, as well as\na fishing license and state park pass. We drove to Wenatchee then up into the overlooking bluffs as I wanted to get\nphotos of a solar event and I did so. The following day it was decided to see if this remote park complex, largely known\nlocally as the Colockum Wildlife Park. There was a Wa State Discovery welcome board at the entrance which stated\nsome basic rules which we carefully examined and agreed we were in full compliance with. Dogs were allowed. So was\novernight up to three nights. Rules said obviosu thinhgs lkike Dont litter no fires/fireworks. Got it and totally ok with it.\nWe even left our cook gear ay storage to avoid any misunderstanding if they should stop or there was a fire in an area\nwe went to.\nJuly 4th\nWe used Google maps to route home now. Maps provided a passage route thropuh and beyond which would being us\nclose to or onto Blewitt Pass, with which we could get back to seattle.\nSometime during the early day my passenger, a disabled elderly woman named Gina Hrpcha; who has serious diabetic\nissues i now know/... informs me she forgot her insulin. We are inside this park network with no cell service.\nMaps was wrong. In fact it is a well known issue among locals according to many locals yet the issue remained and it\ncaught us totally off guard.\nWith the flat tire spare, I nursed my truck at a slow pace, desperately attempting to get this poor woman to services in\norder to get her to help, as her condition degraded quickly as the heat was severe and we had exhausted all water and\nfood now. She was falling asleep\nWe continued as though it went thru noty yet aware it dead ended. Upon being forced to stop I realize I had a flat tire.\nMy spare is also flat, I discover. I put the spare on though, since tire seemed fine and likey broke bead on a deep rut on\nthis rough gravel off road.\nMy passenger is well into diabetic shock or insulin coma now, and only intermittently wakes up. I am frantically\nscreaming to wake her up. I get about 20 miles; I estimate to within about 4 miles of paved roads... and I am completely\nstuck. The physical exertion involved in the ordeal thus far was framatic and I suspect I had a mild stroke, as I have in\nthe past., I realize as it is July 4th I am dealing with a urgent matter and must get help before its too late for us.\nI called 911 and was greeted on phone with rude WHAT DO YOU WANT RYAN?. I was dumbfounded. I explain the\nemergency and express urgency and the dispatcher callously says \"oh well, youre on your owm\". She argues with me for\napproximately 1/2 hour until I BEG her not to let this woman die; I said I know they are after me for political reasons\nbiut the woman is no part of it/ She has kids and grandkids, people will be devastated. I begged them,to rescue her if\nanything/\nEventuallu the dispatcher says she will make some calls. She ask me first \"wat year is uour truck and is it paid for?\" I\nimmediately recognized the mechanisms of a highway robbery type coercion towards road servuce amd I notified her\nVERY CLEAR; I DO NOT NEED A MECHANIC I DO NOT NEED A TOW! I NEED AN AMBULANC!!!! MAM PLEASE\nThe dispatcher then said \"well I dont have an ambulance but I can get your truck towed and you guys wiill be closer to a\nhospital;\". I said this is ludicrous. She saiud take it or leave it. Essentiallu.\nI flatly insisted NOBODY is working on my truck. It just needs air in the tire She went back and forth a half dozen times\nwasting more precious time, exhaustiung me then finally agreed that she heard me amd repeated that she understoof\ntjay I did not consent to any work or tow of my truck. She then said she had a citiy councilman and a orchards employee\nwho could come pick us up.\nThe promise was to drive us to a personal residence where a ambulance would wait for us.\nANOTHER hour goes by and a GMC pickup pulls up man and woman inside. We are grateful to be picked up and offered\nwater/ Keep in mind this is a one way VERY REMOTE and VERY isolated gravel road. We didnt see anyone other than\nthje park workers/\nThese two people drive us up the gravel; tp main road. During the trip I asked politely WHO they are. They ignored me\ncausing me some concern\nThe female takes a call and I hear her mentioning us to someone on the phone. I quietly asked the male who she was\ntalking to, hoping it was the ambulance. He said ite was her work...that she was a DISPATCHER. He claimed he was a\nfireman. Later he admitted he wqs a DISPATCHER also. And later yet I discovered on my OWN; Jeremiah Johnson IS in\nfact, the OPERATIONS CENTER MANAGER at RIVERCOM 911 A PSAP located in Chelan County Washington state and\nservbicng as he exclusive 911 center for Chelan and Douglas counmties in our state; a large territory.\n(Rivercom as I learned; is a private PSAP municipality. Supposeldy or boarded / chaired by politicos and or justices\netc. They keep that hidden though)\nAt the house they take us to I see rrigjt away there is no service on my phone nor my passengers. THIS CONCERNS\nME gravely. I see multiple peop;e tjhere freely using their cell phones and suspect foul play with radio interference.\nGiven what I since learned about Jeremiah Johnson's career I can see a strong likelihgood he jammed our phones.\nWhile there a woman was introduced, oddly three seperate times; as Jeremiah JHohnsons MOTHER. I knew it was\nunlikely but kept it secret, as my distrust for this rescue has bal;loned to sheer panic.\nAt NO TIME did anyone take my passengers vitals or assess her in any way, not even the slightest. This was another\nmassive red flag.\nI asked again and again periodically; where is the ambulance and they never had the same answer just kept lyying said\nit was on the way, they arent sure, it got lost etc etc.\nApproximately one hour into this Jeremiah ask me to go outside so I follow him. There in the long gravel driveway of\nthis very isolated, essentially desert canyon home; is my pickup with an unknown man driving it. Behind my truck still\ncoming down the road a way backl was a RED tow truck which carried an ATV.\nimage.png\nThe Red Tow truck stopped and I immediately filmed to ensure they did not lie and claim they TOWED my truck. I\ncaptured photos of the atv on back and they quickly tried to unload it while others pulled the red hummer fire truck to\nobscure my field of view I suspect. At any rate I was faster. And they are not claiming to have towed my vehicle best I\nknow. (FYI the red hummer was utilized fraudulently also I suspect. It is a first gen military type, and has normal civilian\nplates. I was informed its merely a parade truck. Yet they deployed it for effect by driving it up in front of me with the\nRED ONLY overhead light light bar flashing. Then multiple people adjopined wearing what I immeidately recognized as a\nknockoff city employee uniforms. In the case of Webnatchee its long been known that scammers will utilize\n\"Wenatchee\" shirts with a apple silhouette and it is incredibly similar to official CITY OF WENATCHEE attire the officials\nwear except it does not say \"CITY of..\" it just says Wenatchee\". In the video evidence I am heard addrssinf this.\nWhat occured in fact; without my knowledge or permission and totally against my explicit and repeated DIRECTIVES:\nTHEY STOLE MY VEHICLE.\nJeremiah had apparently communicated with Jerewmiah Johnson to determine year and make then secretly drove to my\ntruck after we were picked up and off waiting for the ambulance.\nThis man demanded 1000 dollars an even number. I know the state law requiores tow operators to register their fees\nwith our state capitol each year. And the idea he randmkly hiut 1000 dollars is ABSURD. I first said THANK YOU.\nSincerely. My hope is to get my injured passenger into my rig, abnd quietly get the hell down the road from this corrupt\ncircus before they freak out and murder us, because i am WELL aware of every. single con they are playing. I worked as\na commercial construction super in the northjeats NY, JErsey, Delaware, MAryland and Florida. I dealt with 100's of\ncorrupt inspectors who put their greedy hands out and did all sorts o\\f shameful crap to try to make an extra buck. I\nseen this all well away and played it cool, acted like i was a fool hoping to pay and leave then contest with visa later.\nThe tow man said no cards allowed. CASH ONLY which illegal in our state. I then thought of a clever way to send a signal\nfor sos to loved ones; I requested access to a phone to call nearby family who would bring cash. Then for no reason they\nvery flatly refused that as well. At that point i was in grave grave danger. They took my truck and wouldnt take payment.\nI then requested documentation or some sort of invoice. They smiled and said there isn't one nor will there be. This\nisn't an impound we are TAKING your truck. I was genuinely confused. I am face to face at this time and being serious\nand polite and gracious; these men are denying me means to make payment and my passenger at this time has now\nbeen away out of site over an hour while they shake. e down. I am desperately concerned for her and aware she is also\nin danger should they attack me to murder me.\nI decide to tell them I have family waiting for us down the road. This lie is one major reason I lived to escape these\nevents that day. During this phase I informed them that I am aware of this being an illegal operation. They yelled at me\nand called me names. I stated that they have clearly interfered with a duress call via 911. That they stole my truck. They\nlikely will face kidnap and extortion charges. They laughed and said I wont live to tell about it. I screamed for Gina my\npassenger she couldnt hear me I guess but I thought she was dead. I am standing there and Jeremiahhs wife Jena runs\nover and punches me in the face with a closed fist. Out of nowjhere., Almsit knocks me out. I stumble and knew\nIMMEDIATELY it was a setup to shoot me and kill me them claim self defense. The tow driver throws my keys down then\nsays he is done/\nJeremuah quickly snatched my keys and says i aint giving your truck backbag now get off my property before I shoot\nyour ass. I see his hand in his back; I beg for my passenger, plead for these people to calm down. Female is laughing at\nme spits on me. Jeeremiah keeps the threats saying leave now. They telll me the passenger is with them now. I asked\nthem to PLEAE get her so I can verify she is ok and wants me to leave. They REFUSE to!\nI immediately see a sketchy situatio where I could be pinned with her murder if i. leave her there and go alone. I STATE\nthat ....and I stay./ They call 911 report that I made threats to leave get a gun come bacl, some type of feloy threats.\nDuring the 45 minutes or so it tool deputi4s to arrive; I hear a woman yell \"WHERE IS RYAN?! I CANT :LET RYAN SEE\nME\". Nobnody know me there or anywhere. I dont have any enemies I know of...well corrupt poloticiasn I exposed in\n2017...YES. But I ran to see WHO she was. With 1% battery on my phone i ready it...and I snap about a dozen photos of\nthe woman fleeing.,. they told her again. \"HURRY, yiou have to go the sherifs deputies wont come on the property while\nyou are on it\".\nThis woman was 20 YEAR veteran CHIEF prosecutor in Seattle / King County, her name is Sally Bagshaw. She was most\nrecently City Councilwoman in 2017 when I heloed the seattle times investigators uncover former Seattle Mayor Ed\nMurrays cps scandal where a custody CPS judge found gold in 1984 for murray molesting his own foster son. This\napparently angered powerful peoople because my innocent wife at the time, Jacika Akter, who was a TSO wiuth TSA at\nSeatac; was robbed at gun point and chased into the hiway and nearly hit by bus. The police ated amused about that\nand the incident prompted our move to philadelphia and nyc. Where nothing like these thiungs happened untiul I moved\nhome a few years ago.... and the gand stalking all started over. Ive been assailted multiuple times nearly murdered many\ntimes. I plan on leaving after this.\nThe arrest was excessive and violent and WILD. They staged a shooting making me move a lot while yelling threats at\nme and saying \"put tsown the gun!\" and \"he has a gun\"... that sort of dialogue wwnr on for 20 minutes or so. I had\nnothing in my hands, beggerf for my life. They listened when i claimed they were being setup to kill a political target and\nthey would be sold out and arrested for lt.\nThe county took almost a YEAR to let me see video evidence. Its all been HEAVILY doctored. You can see the video\nanomalies that indicate they alrtewered it. Its likelu easy to see. Thjey also bulldozed a MOTION I presented A PROPER\nMOTION, to PRESERVE FORENSICS evidence. The prosecutor had nearly fallen out of his chair when he seen it, he\naske me directkly to with draw it. I siad sorry. They continued for two weeks then dismissed the motion after\nbasicalluy RAILROADING my merits which were sound.\nI have an evidence site up at www.ryanhellfiles.com\nBe aware the PSAP Rivercom is privately owned and they are terrified of accountability.\nALSOL: please be aware these people have LIKELY been engaged in similar activity and have cold cases mounting which\nmy case will expose.\nMY LIFE IS IN IMMEDIATE DANGER\nEvolving / WiP EVIDENCE STACK\nwww.ryanhellfiles.com\nRyan Hell - Seattle Wa 98144\n(267)777-2344\nryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nI had no legal grounds to refuse that help. So I consented to accepting a ride.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Chelan_County_Wa_State-_Egregious_911_Abuse_and_Cover_Up.pdf", "filename": "email_Chelan_County_Wa_State-_Egregious_911_Abuse_and_Cover_Up.pdf", "size_mb": 0.08, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.633644", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET. 17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH.", "body": "05/27/25 RiverCom 911 6620\n07:40 CAD Master Call Table: Page: 1\nCall\nLong-Term Call ID 240700787\nActive Call Nature HARASS/THREAT Type l Priority 2\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD City MAL MALAGA\nCalls 11 Dupl 0 Names 4 w/Alrts 2 Wants 1 Prem 0 Adr 0\nZones \u271a \u271a \u271a Determinant Alarm\nDirections BALLARD REQUEST\nComplainant\nNumber X0120458\nLast JOHNSON Fst JEREMIAH Mid LESTE\nAddress\u2713 7599 COLOCKUM RD DOB 05/11/77\nCity MALAGA ST WA ZIP 98828 SSN Personal\nPhone (509)470-4196 Race W Sex M Prev Calls 80 Wants 0 Adr 0\nAlert CWP\nContact\nContact JER Telephone\nAddress\nInformation\nInfo (See below)\nLicense Plate State Color Make Model\nHow Received T Telephone Occurred between 17:11:45 07/04/24\nReceived By HARVILL HEIDI and 17:20:55 07/04/24\nHold Until : : / / When Reported 17:11:45 07/04/24\n= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\nINVOLVEMENTS:\nType Record # Date Description Relationship\nLW 24C06401 07/04/24 HARASS/THREAT *Initiating Call\nNM X0120458 / / JOHNSON, JEREMIAH LESTER *Complainant\nCall Taker Comments:\n____________________\n17:14:31 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\n24C06391\n17:15:20 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nRP AND MOUNTAIN HWY ASSIST M AND F THAT WERE STUCK UP IN THE HILLS, ON PREV\nCALL, SUBJECT IS NOW YELLING THAT HE IS GOING TO GO GET GUNS AND COME BACK AND\nSHOOT, SINCE HE CANNOT AFFORD THE BILL\n17:17:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nSUBJECT IS A RYAN HELL 070978 CELL WAS 267-777-2344 PER PREV CALL\n17:34:51 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP BACK ON THE LINE, MALE IS CAUSING PROBLEMS PULLED A KNIFE\n17:34:58 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nCAN HEAR MALE IN THE BACKGROUND YELLING AT RP\n17:35:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING LE TO STEP IT UP\n17:35:26 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE SAYING HE IS GOING TO CALL 911 NOW\n17:35:29 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHASNT HURT ANYONE\n17:36:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP NOT ENGAGING W/ THE MALE, THE MALE KEEPS TRYING TO TALK TO THE RP\n17:37:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP IS NOT GOING INTO HIS HOUSE, SAYS THAT THE MALE IS PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY AND\nWONT LEAVE\n17:37:27 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP DOESNT WANT TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE MALE MIGHT TRY TO GO INTO HIS HOUSE\n17:39:03 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYING HE IS GOING TO WALK DOWN THE RD TO GET SERVICE TO CALL 911, THE\nFEM WHO WAS W/ THE MALE IS STILL ON SCENE\n17:39:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nPASSING MALAGA MARKET\n17:39:12 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING AWAY NOW\n17:39:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nCAN WE GET A CLOTHING DESC OF MALE\n17:39:37 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWM IN 50S LSW YEL SHIRT W/ TAN VEST BLK JEANS TEENIS SHOES, HAS A BUZZ CUT\n17:40:23 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING DOWN COLOCKUM\n17:40:34 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM W/ HIM ISNT BEING AGGRESSIVE, LOOKS LIKE SHE DOESNT WANT TO BE AROUND THE\nMALE\n17:40:47 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nBELIEVE OTHER HALF IS ON THE LINE NOW, FROM A DISCONNECTED CELL PHN 911-144-2654\nCANT MAKE OUT EVERYTHING HE IS SAYING DUE TO BAD RECEPTION\n17:40:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nFEM IS GOING TO SIT IN THE TOW TRUCK IN THE AC\n17:41:45 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE IS HOMELESS AND DOESNT HAVE $1000 TO PAY THE TOW BILL SAYS HE IS BEING\nTARGETED AND VICTIMIZED\n17:42:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS THEY ARE PREYING ON HIM AND THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH HIM\n17:42:44 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING THEY ARE HIGHWAY ROBBING HIM\n17:43:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYS HE HAD A GOOD TIRE AND THEY DIDNT NEED TO BRING A TIRE\n17:43:50 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nJUST LETTING HIM TALK SO HE ISNT ESCALATING-CANT MAKE OUT MUCH OF WHAT HE IS\nSAYING DUE TO POOR RECEPTION\n17:45:10 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS WALKING BACK UP THE DRIVEWAY, HE IS STILL ON THE PHONE\n17:46:14 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nPASSING RANGE\n17:46:26 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nCOULD NO LONGER HEAR THE MALE DISCONNECTED\n17:46:49 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS BACK BY HIS VEH, IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE VEH AWAY FROM THE RP\n17:47:16 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nWALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AGAIN TO GET BETTER SERVICE\n17:47:32 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nIS BACK ON THE LINE CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING BUT SOUNDS LIKE HE IS\nYELLING\n17:48:46 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WANTING CITY OF WENATCHEE POLICE, ADV HIM CCSO HAS\nJURISDICTION THERE, UNK WHAT HE SAID AFTER AS THE RECEPTION WAS BAD MALE SAID\nTHANK YOU AND HUNG UP AGAIN\n17:48:54 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS TRYING TO TALK TO THE FEM TO GET HER TO COME OUT OF THE TOW TRUCK\n17:49:19 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE KNIFE IS A 4-5 INCH FOLDING BUCK KNIFE, IS ON HIS RIGHT HIP\n17:49:56 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nHE HASNT GOTTEN PHYSICAL W/ ANYONE, HAS JUST BEEN VERBAL AND PULLED THE KNIFE\nOUT EARLIER\n17:51:35 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nWL 133 E PASSING MALAGA MARKET.\n17:52:42 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE IS SAYIING HE IS GOING TO CALL THE FBI AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATED BECAUSE\nTHEY FALSELY IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES\n17:54:15 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE TRYING TO ENGAGE W/ RP AGAIN\n17:54:24 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE RAMBLING IN BACKGROUND\n17:55:33 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWAITING FOR WILDLIFE MP 15\n17:56:57 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE STILL RAMBLING, RP IS NOT ENGAGING\n17:58:17 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\n*EDITED* MALE WALKING BACK DOWN THE DRIVEWAY\n17:59:45 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nMALE KEPT SAYING THAT HE NEEDS HIS KEYS AND THAT THEY ARE IN RPS SHOP, RP\nCHECKED HIS SHOP AND THERE ARE NO KEYS IN THERE, THE KEYS ARE POSS IN THE MALES\nTRUCK\n17:59:57 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nWILDCOM CALLED BACK ADVING THAT WL123 IS ENRT LESS THAN 5 MIN OUT\n18:00:29 07/04/2024 - SMITH CARLEIGH\nSUSP BACK ON THE LINE, NOT HEARING ANYTHING JUST AN OPEN LINE\n18:00:31 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nRP ASKING FEM IS SHE KNOWS WHERE THE KEYS ARE\n18:00:34 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nMALE CALLED BACK, WANTED TO SPEAK TO A WPD DETECTIVE, AS A MATTER OF LIFE OR\nDEATH. WAS ADVISED NO DETECTIVES ON DUTY, THEN ASKED FOR PATROL OFFICER, THEN\nLINE DISCONNECTED\n18:02:01 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nWE HAVE WILDLIFE WITH US WHEN WE SIGN AWAY CLOSE AIR\n18:02:14 07/04/2024 - ROGERS CAYLA\nTHE MALE IS WALKING UP THE CLOCKUM RD\n18:02:44 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nAWAY JUST PAST THE BRIDGE,\n18:02:51 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nEMERG TRAFFIC ONLY\n18:05:11 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nHE IS DETAINED, REOPEN AIR, AIR OPEN\n18:12:08 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nOUT WITH RP\n18:32:07 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: BRUNNER ZACH J\nENRT JAIL\n18:33:05 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nW133 CLEAR\n18:35:12 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI\nCALL/RETURNSPRINTED TO BOOKING P RINTER\n18:46:55 07/04/2024 - HARVILL HEIDI - From: MUSGROVE ADAM\nCONFIRM WITH K34 IF HE GOT MY IM/ YES HE DID\n19:48:01 07/04/2024 - GUTIERREZ DEE\nPER RC58, SUBJECTS VEHICLE WAS MOVED TO PARK AND RIDE LOT AT LINCOLN PARK.\n(MISSION RIDGE PARK AND RIDE)\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nTotal Number of Redactions in Document: 1\nRedaction Reasons by Page\nPage Reason Description Occurrences\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security\nnumbers credit card numbers or bank or\nother financial account numbers except\nwhen disclosure is expressly required by\nor governed by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\nPersonal chapter. \u201cOther financial account\n1 1\nInformation numbers\u201d applies to information such as\nsocial security numbers (as defined in\nRCW 9.35.005). Specific investigative\nrecords compiled by law enforcement\nagencies the nondisclosure is essential for\nthe protection of any person\u2019s right to\nprivacy. Disclosure of social security\nnumbers would be highly offensive to a\nreasonable person and is not of legitimate\nconcern to the public.\nRedaction Date: 5/27/2025 7:54:52 AM\nRedaction Log\nRedaction Reasons by Exemption\nPages\nReason Description\n(Count)\nPersonal Information. Social Security\nNumber-RCW 42.56.230(5)-RCW\n42.56.240(1)-RCW 42.56.050-42 USC \u00a7\n405(c)(2)(C)(viii) (I) Social security numbers\ncredit card numbers or bank or other\nfinancial account numbers except when\ndisclosure is expressly required by or\ngoverned by other law is exempt from\npublic inspection and copying under this\n1(1)\nPersonal Information chapter. \u201cOther financial account numbers\u201d\napplies to information such as social\nsecurity numbers (as defined in RCW\n9.35.005). Specific investigative records\ncompiled by law enforcement agencies the\nnondisclosure is essential for the protection\nof any person\u2019s right to privacy. Disclosure\nof social security numbers would be highly\noffensive to a reasonable person and is not\nof legitimate concern to the public.\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/24C06401_R.pdf", "filename": "24C06401_R.pdf", "size_mb": 0.21, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.424666", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "US Department of Justice", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:33 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email.", "body": "Ryan Hell \nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division\nDOJ Civil Rights - Do Not Reply Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:33 AM\nReply-To: civilrightsdonotreply@mail.civilrights.usdoj.gov\nTo: ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com\nU.S. Department of Justice\ncivilrights.justice.gov\nCivil Rights Division\nPlease do not reply to this email. This is an unmonitored account.\nThank you for submitting a report to the Civil Rights Division. Please save your record\nnumber for tracking. Your record number is: 634919-FZK.\nIf you reported an incident where you or someone else has experienced or is still\nexperiencing physical harm or violence, or are in immediate danger, please call 911\nand contact the police.\nWhat to Expect\n1. We review your report\nOur specialists in the Civil Rights Division carefully read every report to identify civil\nrights violations, spot trends, and determine if we have authority to help with your\nreport.\n2. Our specialists determine the next steps\nWe may decide to:\nOpen an investigation or take some other action within the legal authority of the\nJustice Department.\nCollect more information before we can look into your report.\nRecommend another government agency that can properly look into your report.\nIf so, we\u2019ll let you know.\nIn some cases, we may determine that we don\u2019t have legal authority to handle your\nreport and will recommend that you seek help from a private lawyer or local legal aid\norganization.\n3. When possible, we will follow up with you\nWe do our best to let you know about the outcome of our review. However, we may not\nalways be able to provide you with updates because:\nWe\u2019re actively working on an investigation or case related to your report.\nWe\u2019re receiving and actively reviewing many requests at the same time.\nIf we are able to respond, we will contact you using the contact information you\nprovided in this report. Depending on the type of report, response times can vary. If you\nneed to reach us about your report, please refer to your report number when contacting\nus. This is how we keep track of your submission.\nWhat You Can Do Next\n1. Contact local legal aid organizations or a\nlawyer if you haven\u2019t already.\nLegal aid offices or members of lawyer associations in your state may be able to help\nyou with your issue.\nLegal Services Corporation (or Legal Aid Offices),to help you find a legal aid\nlawyer in your area visit www.lsc.gov/find-legal-aid\n2. Learn More\nVisit civilrights.justice.gov to learn more about your rights and see examples of\nviolations we handle.\nPlease Note: Each week, we receive hundreds of reports of potential violations. We\ncollect and analyze this information to help us select cases, and we may use this\ninformation as evidence in an existing case. We will review your letter to decide\nwhether it is necessary to contact you for additional information. We do not have the\nresources to follow-up on every letter.\nContact\ncivilrights.justice.gov U.S. Department of (202) 514-3847\nJustice 1-855-856-1247 (toll-free)\nCivil Rights Division Telephone Device for the\n950 Pennsylvania Deaf\nAvenue, NW (TTY) (202) 514-0716\nWashington, D.C.\n20530-0001\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division.pdf", "filename": "email_Thank_you_for_submitting_a_report_to_the_Civil_Rights_Division.pdf", "size_mb": 0.09, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.792658", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": null, "sender_email": null, "sender_agency": "Chelan County Superior Court", "recipient_name": null, "recipient_email": null, "date_sent": null, "subject": null, "summary": "SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF CHELAN\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON, ) CASE NO: 24-1-00253-04\n` Plaintiff, )\n) DEFENDANT'S PRO SE\n) EMERGENCY MOTION TO\nv. ) EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND DISMISS FOR\n) OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT\nRyan Hell, )\nDefendant.", "body": "SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF CHELAN\nSTATE OF WASHINGTON, ) CASE NO: 24-1-00253-04\n` Plaintiff, )\n) DEFENDANT'S PRO SE\n) EMERGENCY MOTION TO\nv. ) EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND DISMISS FOR\n) OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT CONDUCT\nRyan Hell, )\nDefendant. )\n__________________________________ )\nI. INTRODUCTION\nCOMES NOW the Defendant, Ryan Hell, acting Pro Se, and moves this Honorable\nCourt for an order:\n1) Excluding the State\u2019s video evidence, and\n2) Dismissing the charges with prejudice based on documented **Outrageous\nGovernment Conduct (OGC)** and the systematic **Spoliation of Evidence**, in\nviolation of the Defendant\u2019s due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth\nAmendments to the U.S. Constitution.\nII. STATEMENT OF FACTS SUPPORTING MOTION\nThe State's prosecution is fundamentally compromised by a demonstrable pattern of\nofficial fraud and misconduct, including the fabrication of official records and the\nprovision of forensically tampered video evidence. The State\u2019s continued reliance on\nthis compromised evidence constitutes a violation of the constitutional standard for\nOutrageous Government Conduct.\nIII. GROUND I: FABRICATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (OUTRAGEOUS\nGOVERNMENT CONDUCT) The State has relied upon a false narrative and fabricated\ndocumentation, evidenced by:\nA. Falsification of Towing Records (Official Narrative vs. Documented Fact) Official\nreports and summaries falsely allege that the tow company used or called to the scene\nwas **Mountain View Towing**. The Defendant has established that the actual company\npresent was **B&T Tow Company, e.g., B&T Towing]**, and that the claim regarding\nMountain View Towing is a **deliberate fabrication of fact** within the official records,\nmanufacturing a false basis for prosecution.\nB. Alteration of the CAD Report The police Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) file was\nallegedly altered, changing the nature of the initial emergency call from a medical event\n(**\u201cstroke\u201d**) to a minor property event (**\u201cflat tire\u201d**). This alteration constitutes a willful\nact to manufacture a justification for subsequent police intervention and criminal\ncharges.\nIV. GROUND II: SYSTEMATIC SPOLIATION AND TAMPERING OF VIDEO EVIDENCE\nThe State\u2019s video evidence is forensically unsound and demonstrates a willful,\nsystematic attempt to conceal its manipulation across multiple files.\nA. Concealment of Modification History (Primary Video) The file\u2019s metadata (File:\n**20240704_173916.mp4**) shows the **CreateDate** and **ModifyDate** are\n**identical** (**2024:07:05 00:40:06**), despite the file being disclosed almost 12\nmonths later. This is conclusive evidence that the file\u2019s modification history was\n**deliberately stripped or reset** to conceal processing, which constitutes **Spoliation of\nEvidence.**\nB. Evidence of Concealed Timestamp and Processing (Dash Cam Video) The police\ndash cam video evidence has its time stamp **zeroed out** and indicates it was\nrendered using **FFmpeg** format. Stripping the time stamp conceals the crucial time\nof recording, and FFmpeg is a third-party multimedia framework used for complex\nediting and transcoding, not a native camera output.\nC. Evidence of Advanced Digital Manipulation Tags The primary video file contains the\n**`VideoHandle`** tag, a component associated with 3D rendering and scene\nmanipulation libraries (e.g., videohandles.github.io), and a **non-standard 30.119\nFPS**, all of which demonstrate that the video was subjected to **advanced,\ncontent-altering manipulation.**\nConclusion: The systematic concealment of modification history and the documented\nuse of manipulation tools across multiple files constitutes **Spoliation of Evidence** and\nrenders all video evidence unreliable and inadmissible.\nV. RELIEF REQUESTED\nWHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court to order:\n1. **Exclusion** of all video evidence provided by the State.\n2. **Dismissal** of all charges with prejudice based on the documented, systematic\npattern of **Outrageous Government Conduct** (CAD file alteration, tow company lie,\nevidence tampering) which violates the Defendant's constitutional right to due process.\n3. **Scheduling** an evidentiary hearing to receive testimony regarding the documented\nspoliation of evidence.\nDated this 5th day of November, 2025.\n___________________________________\nRyan Hell,, Defendant Pro Se\n", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/motionToDismiss_RyanHellChelanCounty.pdf", "filename": "motionToDismiss_RyanHellChelanCounty.pdf", "size_mb": 0.05, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:22.397665", "is_email_pdf": false } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "RiverCom 911", "recipient_name": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell", "recipient_email": "JMS_HELL@yahoo.com", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 Good morning Brian.", "summary": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm.", "body": "Yes, I am available today at 3pm. Thank you.\nRyan Hell\n(267)777-2344\nOn Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 11:49 AM wrote:\nDEAR RYAN:\nSorry for the delay. It\u2019s been a rather hectic week.\nYour next court hearing is August 20 at 9:30 a.m. The judge authorized you to appear via Zoom for this hearing.\nAre you available today at around 3:00 p.m. to have a teleconference to discuss your case?\nSincerely,\nBrian Chase\nLaw Offices of Brian Chase, PLLC\n7 E Street S.E.\nQuincy, WA 98848\n(509) 787-9000\n(F) (509) 787-9040\nNOTICE:\nThis electronic communication and any attachments may contain privileged or other confidential information and\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nremain for the sole use of the named addressee, who is the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use,\ndisclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply email\nand immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments without copying, transmitting, or\ndisclosing the contents. Thank you.\nFrom: Ryan Hell \nSent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:23 PM\nTo: Bchaselaw@nwi.net; james hell \nSubject: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304\nGood morning Brian.\nI am concerned with making next appearance as I misplaced papers do not know date.\nAlso related to my concern for attendence and readiness is I believe there is a noted permission by the judge for\nme to appear by zoom if you could verify also.\nI have been preparing a lot of evidence into a distribution teams hands so I can try to get help or at least sound the\nalarm in the event I am wrongfully convicted and or murdered.\nI assume there is some strategy and details we should discuss and I look forward to hearing your input and I have\ngotten pretty well organized with a quite a bit of the evidence however I think I am missing a lot of it so we need to\ngo over the complete list of evidence as well as the problems I have repeatedly addressed in court and to all\ncouncils assigned and namely that is video evidence which is heavily tampered and a Brady problem I have tried to\ncite formally in motion and via counsel since they refused to grant me access to the video evidence for nearly a\nyear.\nA second more evident brady violation occured when I addressed concerns inside the court room on the record,\nabout the urgency of obtaining MY initial 911 call audio which was me calling 911 to get emergency help for a dying\npassenger. The conversation was outrageous and cruel and would have been icredbly damning. I still have a CAD\nfile though and it is telling. It proves I declared not one; but two life threatening medical emergencies. But with no\nexplination it also shows the call was downgraded to ROAD SIDE ASSISTANCE. So does Rivercom follow MDPS\nprotocol, for dispatch priority and downgrades? YES they used to. But that changed just days later. They claim they\njust wing it now. No formal downgrade policy. But we both know there is not a single damn dispatch agency, law\nenforcement agency or jail or anything, or even schools, where a life threatening medical emergency can be\ndowngraded at the stroke of a keyboard like that without a medical assessment by EMT etc. Rivercom silently\ndowngraded our call without telling us. They did it before anyone had been to see us. We were stranded in the\npark.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nThis case should never have been held int Chelan. Becuase of the sensitive nature of the case; Rivercom 911's\ncentral role in the incident; quite literally the most central player involved. It was thru Riovercom that we were\nkidnapped later extorted and falsely charged imprisoned.\nThere isnt a doubt in my mind that they are trying to kill me or disappear me imto prison for a set of crimes I never\ncommitted. Perhaps as I have suggested; it could be because of my whistleblowing acy\nThey ultimately refused an ambulance and instead sent an operations manager.... on 4th of july mind you, to a\nstranded motorist with a flat tire and dying passenger. As if that wasn't sketchy enough, said Operations Manager\ndrives us 20 miles the opposite way of the city of wenatchee and the hospital. While i understand that kidnapping is\nnot going to be filed against Jeremiah johnson anytime soon: It could be. Who knows.\nNeither here nor there. My goal is to address the sequence of events from time of 911 call seeking help, until the\ntime of alleged crime; actually after since I personally witnessed the female with jeremiah, entering inside rivercom\noperations center a secured area, alongside Jeremiah Johnson who I discovered thru investigations that is the\noperations center manager for Rivercom.\nMy understanding is the court now claims the woman who was with Jeremiah and picked us up; is not in fact, an\nemployee of Rivercom. Which opens a lot of questions:\n1) are they lying about her employment status to cover it up or to avoid lawsuit\n2) is she someone who never was an employee, and if so what\u2019s her relationship to Jeremiah?\n3) is she in fact who they claim she is? How can ai be sure that\u2019s her real name even?\nI do also know that during the trip to their home; the female had fielded a couple phone calls and the efforts she\nmade to conceal the nature of those calls was actually one of the primary red flags I had upon engaging in this odd\nrescue with these people. I asked if that was the ambulance she was talking to, and Jeremiah said no it\u2019s her work\nthe 911 centers They initially said they were volunteering to help rescue us. Then they said she was on call. I know\nbetter than that. You can\u2019t \u201cvolunteer\u201d while you are \u201con call\u201d. It\u2019s federal outlawed under IRS and a bunch of other\ncommon sense stuff. Again, more red flags.\nThese two people were dodgy right away because they smiled and were talkative but they avoided answering\nsimple critical and legitimate immediate concerns like \u201cwho are you\u201d upon picking us up, \u201cWhere are we going\u201d and\n\u201cwhy didn\u2019t you take us to er in Wenatchee\u201d.\nJeremiah hesitated at all these questions then at times for things such as this he had to look at the woman for\nguidance whether it be a nod or she answers. The woman in turn was furiously sending text to someone while we\nwere all still en route inside Jeremiah\u2019s truck.\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nAbsolutely not legit what they are doing in regards to her;\nEither she was working for someone else who then utilized Rivercom to conduct some sort of off the record\nengagement with myself pr Gina, this interrupting a 911 duress call and also facilitating the kidnapping; essentially\nthat\u2019s what it is when. You trick someone to going to your home by saying an ambulance will meet them there. Of\ncourse I do not have any faith in Jeremiah or other bad actors being criminally charged at the state level and\nfederal relief is very time consuming and will likely be heard without me or Gina present. Fortunately the paper trail\nof sloppy cover up attempts provides antiquit evidence to illustrate some serious malfeasance as well as a nasty\nattempt to cover up while harming the same victims even more.\nI have been wronged and grave danger is before me in this matter. This case is absolutely fabricated lies and there\nhave been irreversible damage to my defense INTENTIONALLY inflicted by the assigned counsel, presumably\nunder some direction of the judges prosecutors and the chairs and invested owners of Rivercom 911. I\u2019ve been lied\nto on the record multiple times. I\u2019ve been called a liar on the record. I\u2019ve had a lawyer refuse to consult for over 9\nmonths. Another finally got the video evidence but lied claiming I could only view it in his office. When I arrived to\nwatch the video I wanted to scream! Within ten minutes there were fifteen key pieces of video that would put the\nprosecutor in jail, the deputy out of a job, and the rivercom 911 agency under heavy scrutiny and likely legal action.\nFirst of all the real video showed that the dispatchers were berating me abusing me calling me names threatening\nto assault me and assaulted me. They were screaming at me. I walked away to try to call 911 again and get them to\nintervene.\nTHE VIDEO SHOWED MY BACK TO THEM WHILE I AM TRYING TO HEAR ON 911; and then I lower my phone\nand say \u201cthey hung up on me!? ARE UOU SERIOUS!?\u201d Because without delay the dispatcher that answered said\n\u201cWHAT do you want now?\u201d I said I wanted a state patrol and she said sorry\u201d and the line went dead. As I am\nlooking at my phone lowered in my hand, back to them; the female dispatcher is laughing quietly to Jeremiah\nsaying she \u201cjust hung up on the dumb fuck\u201d.\nThen it also shows the DEPUTY being TOLD by the tow operator that he never impounded my vehicle. He never\ntowed it he drove it. And he wasn\u2019t owed any money. The deputy then asked what about repairs? The tow operator\nsaid \u201che doesn\u2019t owe me for changing a flat as a Good Samaritan then driving his truck back to him he\u2019s free to go\nby me\u201d. The deputy looking flustered acknowledged that. Yet in his report he states the not just false but entirely\ninflammatory \u201ccouldn\u2019t pay for work he had done because he is homeless\u201d. Which is pretty maddening. Because I\nnot only could pay the 1000 dollars I had to pay three times that in the days that followed as they destroyed my\ntransmission and Gina broke down my truck requiring it to be in a shop the next day. Over 2900 all said on that.\nAnd I was never mad at her for it.\nThese people are engaged in swell and sick things out there. Whether they targeted me because I am a notable\ngrass roots whistleblower who exposed Seattle mayor Ed Murray and raised the alarm for FURTHER investigations\ninto Seattle elites and the death of Delvin Heckard, a man who Murray molested as a orphan, then settled lawsuit\nan ultimately was found dead in a hotel just days later of an unusual overdose according to king county medical\nexaminers. I raised hell about it all.\nIn 2017 shortly after I assisted Seattle times with uncovering a difficult archive which was set for permanent\ndestruction in just days; my wife was at a bus stop in redondo beach area / dash point federal way waiting go to\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nSeaTac airport when she was robbed by a Hispanic male with a chrome handgun which he violently cocked back\nthen ran up pointing to her head while demanding money, in such a way my wife was forced into thw way and\nmiraculously somehow though, escaped being struck by a bus in the fog.\nI also need to add that we moved to the east coast and never once did I notice or feel like possibly anything was\nstalking or weird. Then I returned home and it\u2019s been happening all over again. And it\u2019s the usual stasi tactics to\nmake you so freaked out you report them and they can call you crazy.\nThis camping trip was planned for months. We made several stops including our storage units and that\u2019s evidence\nof needed, where we loaded camping gear.\nWe were in a designated and posted state park. We were abiding by all laws. And yet these people did this to us.\nI want to see evidence.\nWhat I mean is yes I\u2019ve been shown some things.\nBut I know damned well the prosecutor will try to fabricate more stuff say of trial.\nI am demanding everything.\nAnd ai am also filing a Brady motion again, not because of you but because the last three times the lawyers were\nnot allowing it then when I did I was bulldozed over by a screaming judge. So I\u2019ll need to file. Brady regarding\nirreversible irreparable damage to defense caused by Justin Titus lying about having in his possession the 911\ncalls; and also I think one of the judges actually said so also. This occured on the record. I raised alarm for the\nspoilation of my voice audio recordings for my initial 911 calls. In those calls the dispatcher laughed as I begged her\nto not let my passenger die. She said no ambulances were available. She said they were sending a city council\nmember then Jeremiah shows up, admits he\u2019s a dispatcher and fire man.\nI am well aware that the plan is to take me into custody then disappear me. I want you to know that you are an\naccomplice at this point if you can\u2019t help me then tell them to reassign you because I am providing the details that\nundeniably prove these people kidnapped us extorted me then falsely charged me to cover it up. I have photos and\nthe rest is easily seen in their own damn evidence. Check way back machine for their rivercom911.com website.\nLook around the dates of July 4 2024. Come On man. Them go look at the changes to race recently made\nregarding dispatchers. Same thing. Changed all of it\nI\u2019m not stupid and I\u2019m not alone. I\u2019m not superhuman or maybe I am but I\u2019m not invincible and yes they can murder\nGmail - RE: Ryan Hell Chelan Superior #2410025304 1/3/26, 12:06 PM\nme but it\u2019s going to be haunting them all and that means everyone who is involved, forever. They can block me\naway then scrub it all up. But it\u2019s too late. There\u2019s other witnesses already.\nPlease let me know what I should do regarding this case\n2 attachments\n07-05-24 24C06401 Hell Ryan Report.pdf\n1623K\nID#8385903208920250714161223.pdf\n991K", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_RE__Ryan_Hell_Chelan_Superior__2410025304.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.550643", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "Questions", "recipient_email": "Question@wsba.org", "date_sent": null, "subject": "[External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=90da43da49&view=pt&search=\u2026=msg-f:1831672489715170539&simpl=msg-f:1831672489715170539&mb=1 Page 1 of 5", "summary": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.", "body": "Gmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nYou don't often get email from ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com. Learn why this is important\nChelan Superior Court\nCause # 24-1-00253-04\n(Felony Harassment X 3)\nDoI: July 4th, 2024\nChelan County Superior\nVS.\nRyan Hell\nI am looking for a place to make a serious ethics complaint regarding an obvious and brazen violation of a\nmyriad of court ethics which have occurred and continue to occur in Chelan County, Washington state.\nOn July 3-4, 2024, I was traveling with a passenger in a very remote desert canyon outside of Wenatchee\nWashington.\nMy vehicle became disabled on this primitive park road and after exhaustive efforts to self rescue and get back to\ncell phone service so I could call for help from friends; I was faced with the dilemma that we were not going to\nmake it off the mountain without help. My passengers medical situation was quickly deteriorating since she was\nnot carrying her insulin this day, and had been without food and water in the neat 100 degree direct sunlight.\nIn summary, 911 was called and they refused to provide rescue and claimed the best they could do is have a city\nmanager pick us up in their personal vehicle and take us to their personal home where they would have an\nambulance waiting to treat my passenger.\nWe were picked up then driven to an even more remote location outside of cell service also (aside from 911\nservice).\nThis location seemed odd and it was not in reasonable direction of the hospital nor was it towards town.\nUpon getting us to their home, the two people who picked us up identified themselves as off duty dispatchers and\nsaid they work or the same call center (Rivercom 911 in Wenatchee), which I had called via 911 for help.\nThere was a woman present who I later recognized as the stenographer in the Chelan County Court. I believe her\nname is Barbera but I have been unable to identify her and my lawyers have refused to make note of this issue as\nwell. She was introduced to me at the scene as the dispatchers mother.\nMy passenger was never treated and no personnel or person took any vitals nor did they ask her for a list of\nconditions, complications, or concerns. They handed her a bottle of water then promptly ordered me to\naccompany the male dispatcher outside.\nUpon exiting the garage where they had taken us to, there was a man driving my truck with the extra key I kept\nhidden in case of emergency. The dispatcher introduced this man as his friend then said he was a tow operator,\nand I needed to settle up on his bill.\nA dispute of mild calibre started and I calmly reminded the tow truck operator that any work or tow of my vehicle\nhas been done without my authorization and him driving my vehicle without my consent, could be construed as\nauto theft. I asked what he wanted to do and he angrily threw my key tp the male dispatcher and said her was not\ninterested in it anymore.\nDispatchers now circled me with 3 others and they continued to berate me and demand money for saving my\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\npassengers Iife.\nIn the recently surrendered evidence video the female dispatcher is heard demanding 1000 cash payment for their\nlife saving services, as my passenger would have been dead if it weren\u2019t for them.\nDuring the altercation, the female dispatcher began to hurl insults at me, as did the others.\nShe struck me in the head after I plead for them to have mercy and get my passenger help. She ran to me then\nstruck me in the face, and I never raised a hand to block it or to hit her back, as I was convinced they were\nattempting to create a \u201cself defense\u201d or \u201cjustifiable homicide\u201d scenario. They stood there while she the hit me then\nlaughed.\nThis entire time my passenger was inside the shop / garage approximately 50 meters away. I begged them to let\nus go, pleaded not to hurt her. Thye laughed and demanded I leave without my passenger.\nI refused to leave because I had a strong suspicion that they would do her harm then blame me; in some twisted\nform of witness elimination.\nTowards the end of the ordeal; a man yelled \u201cget out of here! The police will be here soon!\u201d. I then heard an\nunknown females voice from the other side of the driveway, yell \u201cwhere is Ryan? I cant let Ryan see me!\u201d. The\nman yelled \u201cyou have to go now, they are almost here!\u201d. The woman then replied \u201cwhere is he, I don\u2019t know where\nhe is?!\u201d And the man yelled again \u201cjust go!\u201d.\nAs I ran toward that commotion I was instantly aware that something was going on, there were bad actors here\ntrying to do me harm, and someone here knows me personally. So I ran with my phone in hand ready to take\ncapture that evidence and ask the personb to stop who was obviously engaged in a number of very alarming\nbehaviors and conduct all serious crimes.\nI encountered a new red / burgundy Toyota 4x4 truck, and a woman driving who was startled to see my face. She\ntried to go around me by driving off of the drive way then floored it and I very narrowly escaped being run down.\nArresting officers from. Chelan County Sheriff and Wildlife department arrived mere moments later. They\nperformed a bizarre and extremely dangerous stop by pulling up then ordering see to move away. From the front\n(dash cam I presume), to an area off field of vision. My hands were high and I immediately delcared in a calm\nvoice that I am non-combative, and will comply. I let them know I am peaceful. They told me shut the fuck up and\nmade repeated threats to shoot me. One officer declared that he seen a firearm in my right hand and they were a\nmere 20 feet away, broad daylight and no shadows or obstructions.\nI plead with them that I did not have a weapon and the sergeant again threatened to shoot me if I said one\nmore word. The sergeant and the other sherif deputy began to verbally discuss taking their shot. I am not talking. I\nam complying, hands empty and in the air doing as instructed.\nI was ordered to back up slow by one officer. As soon as I complied the sergeant began screaming and said\nthe next time I move he will \u201cblow your fucking head off\u201d. The deputy then yelled to me to cross my ankles and as\nI compiled the other seargent screamed that he was now shooting me.\nAnd they commenced to giving each other a count down to taking the shot at me.\nIn response to the hysterics, panic, and likely the dehydration and het stroke from having worked brutally hard\ntrying to dig my truck out for 20 MILES in direct sunlight\u2026. My body had an uncontrollable and violent spasm and\nI slammed without warning into the dirt with force and faster than I could brace myself.\nI was arrested and arraigned on 3 counts of felony harassment for some type of threats to use firearms they\nclaimed.\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM\nIn my police report the dispatcher is on the phone with his dispatcher agency and they say \u201ca sherif is coming to\narrest Ryan and take him away\u201d. The male dispatcher who picked us up then replied, according to evidence (log)\n\u201che doesn\u2019t need to just get arrested. He needs to disappear for good\u201d.\nIn court I was released and appointed a PD. That first public defender resigned off my case citing a conflict of\ninterest; but quietly told me this case is very serious and involves powerful people who are in a lot of trouble.\nThe next court appointed lawyer was Justin Titus from Titus Law. I spoke in court briefly at side; and urged him to\nlet me know if this case was too sticky for him. I expressed serious concerns for the integrity of evidence and the\ntimeliness we obtain it due to its exculpatory nature and the unusual and murky circumstances of the case.\nPD Justin Titus then went on to refuse to answer my emails or calls, additionally he completely boycotted any\ninvolvement as counsel in the case. I was denied timely access evidence and zI was even denied any status to\nwhy that delay exists or what evidence there may be.\nI was issued a warrant after failure to obtain my court date and I promptly traveled to Wenatchee to turn myself in.\nI politely raised my concerns regarding counsel and was granted a new PD after Justin Titus told the judge he\nwanted to part ways with me as a client.\nThe new lawyer appointed, again by Chelan Superior court, is Sean Esworthy from Kottkamp, Yedinak &\nEsworthy, P.L.L.C, and he is a young DUI attorney but seems to be communicating sufficiently with me. He called\nme to come view video evidence and I again traveled to Wenatchee to visit his office. Upon viewing evidence I\nwas floored by the egregious conduct and brazen disregard for law, duty and human life exhibited by these people\non video. The video supports the narrative summary above and it fails however; to show me threaten anyone\nother than to put my hands ip and plead with them to not strike me again in the face anymore.\nThe most perplexing part of this entire case for me personally; was the involvement and clear intent of sherifs\narresting me. And more disturbing yet, their dash cam footage was heavily ALTERED and I can point out\ndiscrepancies which support this claim.\nAdditionally the dispatchers dispute and abuse portion has also been altered and there are significant and easy to\nidentify discrepancies and artifacts which are telltale signs of tampering.\nMy PD, Sean Esworthy has secured approval for a forensics professional who specializes in video.. and I assume I\nmust wait and have faith that both Sean Esworthy and the forensics video expert are acting ethically and with my\nbest interest, which would be; to pursue exoneration for myself by uncovering their wrong doings and exposing\ntheir claim as a false pretense for arrest.\nWhat Else Can I Do?\nWho Can I Report These Crimes To?\nRyan Hell\nSeattle WA\n(267)777-2344\nGmail - RE: [External]Ethics Complaints Help Sought 1/3/26, 11:54 AM", "has_attachments": false, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_RE___External_Ethics_Complaints_Help_Sought.pdf", "size_mb": 0.12, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.712645", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we\ngot to their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of\ncompany and home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled\nB&T of cashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving\nbehind my pickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man\neventually surrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and\nhe admitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on\nand aired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As\nit was, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down\nthe rabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal\nresidence\u201d. I can\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the\nmountain of discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is\nthe fact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non\nrivercom non CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and\ncommit murder. None of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t\nseeing what\u2019s clearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any\nmoral reason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s\nreally dumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner\ncampaign contributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he\nADOPTED then molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected,\nthere\u2019s been much convo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the\noffice of Seattle mayor? Come on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being\nsilenced like this then let\u2019s note that.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly\ncriminal actions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure\nthat accountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better\nthings to do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and\nconstitutional rights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence\nwas tampered. And most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was\nconspired by Jeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom\noperations and technology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and\nWenatchee fire. Wa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich\nprogrammatically should have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nGmail - RE: Status on conflict of interest with court personnel 1/3/26, 12:07 PM\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t\nget it. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified\nof me roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice\nto share it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not\nonly make a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "email_Gmail_-_RE__Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.18, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:20.569643", "is_email_pdf": true } }, { "sender_name": "Ryan Hell", "sender_email": "ryanbrooklyn2020@gmail.com", "sender_agency": "Chelan County", "recipient_name": "", "recipient_email": "Bchaselaw@nwi.net", "date_sent": null, "subject": "Status on conflict of interest with court personnel Brian-", "summary": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there. I have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.", "body": "Brian-\nI\u2019m still trying to get ahold of you to get Alan update on what has been done to address the issue of Jeremiah\u2019s mother\nwho is the stenographer or I should say was the stenographer for most of the past year although the last appearance\nshe was not there.\nI have a serious problem with the fact that Jena and Jeremiah introduced the woman as Jeremiah\u2019s mother when we got\nto their residence.\nI have numerous emails to prior counsel and so far nobody has formally acknowledged this concern and it is deeply\nconcerning as the woman has responsibility concerning Bering court records. Could you please update me on the\nsituation and if need be I can create my own motion to deliver at our next appearance for this issue.\nAs far as tow trucks;\nI\u2019ve put together a number of citations state and federal which explicitly mandate tow trucks bear the name of company\nand home city they belong to. The red tow trucks bare depicted throughout the evidence is clearly labeled B&T of\ncashmere Washington state. There was no other tow truck. I have photos and videos of the tow truck driving behind my\npickup which was driven by the man in the photo which he indicated was his tow truck, and the same man eventually\nsurrendered interest in my truck full stop.\nFurther, I have seen the original unedited evidence videos which very clearly establish the deputy asking for tow or\nservice invoices and being very clearly told, three times that there was no bill. There was never a tow he admitted to\ndriving my truck. And there was no service rendered other than the wheel & tire he delivered which I did not want and he\nadmitted to deputy he removed it. The deputy was even told very clearly, that they put my original wheel back on and\naired it up to make the truck roadworthy.\nThe same man then drove my passenger to the park and ride where he left her after ensuring she could operate my\nvehicle. She drove it to cle slum before the tire went flat again, and we had to get AAA to tow it here.\nFor a dispute of magnitudes erupting into alleged threats as they claim, it\u2019s bizarre they would just let the truck go as\nthey did.\nI now have confirmation of Jeremiah as operation manager from rivercom, but still no word on his fire employment. As it\nwas, he impersonated a city firefighter at the scene and the narrative that a understaffed call center had the ability to\nspare Jeremiah for some sort of volunteer fire duty, on Fourth of July, is absurd.\nAdditionally the claim that he left his volunteer fire duties to volunteer for whatever our emergency was even if it were\ndeath, is even more unbelievable. It might even be illegal or violates department policy. But that\u2019s a lot of hops down the\nrabbit hole spinning a yarn claiming he is basically derelict of two jobs to come take us to his \u201cpersonal residence\u201d. I\ncan\u2019t see why he\u2019d do that when he\u2019s on call, Fourth of July.\nI have real problems with rivercoms denial of Jenna being their employee, also. There are a dozen key indicators that\nshe is either a Rivercom employee and they are lying; or she was accessing Rivercom tech as a non employee, and\nabusing it to harm me and my passenger.\nMost notably, in one video Jenna is heard quietly bragging to Jeremiah and another about how she \u201cjust hung up\u201d on\nme, and my back is to the camera as I struggle to call state patrol in a desperate attempt to get help after Jenna struck\nme in the face nearly knocking me out. Jeremiah stood next to her watching while I scrambled backwards to escape a\nphysical attack; the original video also shows Jeremiah sprint after me reaching for his gun. This is attempted murder.\nClear and plain and I\u2019ve already reported this to federal DoJ and other state officials.\nThe behavioral analysis clearly indicates I\u2019m not threatening and I\u2019m very carefully attempting to create space and\ndiffuse multiple unwarranted attacks.\nThis case was a political kidnapping and conspiracy to commit murder and there is no way you cannot see the mountain\nof discrepencies in their case.\nThe neon light, 10,000 lb gorilla in the room though which should signal you to criminal malfeasance by Jeremiah; is the\nfact that on 4th of July he took us to his home. And the tow truck lie we know 911 doesn\u2019t do roadside.\nI have about a dozen incredibly damnding pieces of evidence which clearly prove Jeremiah was scting on a non rivercom\nnon CHELAN county employees directives and willfully carried out egregious conspiracy to kidnap and commit murder.\nNone of it is circumstantial and I have to notify you of this because on the off chance that you aren\u2019t seeing what\u2019s\nclearly occured, I don\u2019t want you feeling trapped.\nAgain; in addition to me being innocent of these charges; I was a law abiding park visitor who got caught in a bad jam\nbecause some I had with me did not bring her insulin and I got a flat tire. I beat the ever living dog piss out of my old\npickup to get her back to services. Then Jeremiah and Jena decided for whatever reason they were gonna steal my\ntruck through some scheme with their buddy from b&t towing flat over in cashmere. If you need I\u2019ll send you the\nstatutes regarding tow truck markings. You can\u2019t just drive a truck and say \u201cbut I work for cuz towing\u201d. It has to be\npainted on and large to specified dimensions. This was a newer truck with nice new painted logos names etc. I have\nphotos of them coming down the road. Unloading their atv. And my passenger is witness to this all as well.\nWhatever Jeremiah did isn\u2019t my fault. Probably only half his fault. I told the prosecuted once already; I\u2019m done playing\ngames and I will not stop unraveling this mess they created in our lives, for no legal reason. There isn\u2019t even any moral\nreason.\nAre they mad at me for exposing jay insees pump and dump campaign mockery when he ran against Trump then\ndropped out? Look up what inslees odds were. Like 1 in 600 million. So if inslee is legitimately mad about that he\u2019s really\ndumb I guess. Maybe he\u2019s mad how I informed people that Inslees entire campaign was a fraud; to garner campaign\ncontributions then drop out and keep them, per campaign finance law.\nAnd maybe it\u2019s payback for helping the Seattle times locate former mayor Ed Murray\u2019s cps scandal where he ADOPTED\nthen molested a black kid in the 80\u2019s. They knew of his skeletons in his closet the day he got elected, there\u2019s been much\nconvo about the foia release of mayors phone logs etc. So they put a serial child rapist into the office of Seattle mayor?\nCome on man. You and I both know what that\u2019s about and if you are ok with me being silenced like this then let\u2019s note\nthat.\nBut so far I don\u2019t know what is going on with this highly irregular case to put it nicely. I keep refraining from lawsuits\nhoping the prosecutor will wise up. But he thinks a false incarcerationnfollowed by execution or another longer\nincarceration is his strategy.\nYou are in the losing side with this one. I\u2019m sure it. Sounds like wishful thinking but these are extremely deadly criminal\nactions which Jeremiah Jena and the rest engaged in. I have the cooperation of enough people to ensure that\naccountability is ultimately delivered from a higher court in the ever I am wrongfully convicted but I have. Better things\nto do with my life. For over two years now I have been harassed by malicious prosecutions.\nThis case has no merit and it is a pitiful attempt to cover up gross violations of multiple people\u2019s civil, and constitutional\nrights. The unimpeachable evidence I have is absolutely enough to prove that without a doubt evidence was tampered.\nAnd most importantly it clearly proves that a serious sophisticated plot to murder me in cold blood was conspired by\nJeremiah and numerous other county agencies by using Jeremiah\u2019s unlimited access to rivercom operations and\ntechnology and the ability so he thought, to recruit or draft in b&t tow operator, CHELAN deputies, and Wenatchee fire.\nWa state emergency management has failed to cooperate enough already to obvious red flags ehich programmatically\nshould have triggered a heavy investigation; and. This tell me they are also complacent.\nWhat in gods name could o possibly be rumored to have ever been a part of which justifies this all? Personally I do t get\nit. Because I\u2019m not a criminal and have for no wrong. These are sick criminals, corrupt opportunist who are terrified of\nme roaming the state and exposing their crimes. And I am not even the one finding it. I just have the loudest voice to\nshare it. And in the words of a local politico out there recently who I talked to about this matter; it\u2019s my DUTY to not only\nmake a report of this ordeal. But to make sure every hears sbout it.\nI\u2019ve been patient and I am waiting for verdict to broadcast these findings. Because nobody should be allowing any of\nthese people keep their jobs after this. This is absolutely sickening.", "has_attachments": true, "file_info": { "path": "/var/www/media/documents/email_RE-_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "filename": "email_RE-_Status_on_conflict_of_interest_with_court_personnel.pdf", "size_mb": 0.14, "modified": "2026-01-27T22:26:21.384653", "is_email_pdf": true } } ] }